ESCAP and Governance: the next steps Background and Context In the interval between the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (or Rio+20) and the conclusion of the Millennium Development Goals, the international community has been increasingly focused on – and giving greater prominence and emphasis to – governance and ensuring that all peoples benefit from inclusive and sustainable development in the post-2015 development agenda. One key message from Rio+20 is the importance of effective governance through democracy, good governance and the rule of law – at the local, national, regional and global levels – for achieving sustainable development. Institutions are needed at all levels that are effective, transparent, accountable and democratic in order to achieve sustainable development goals. The report of the UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda, Realizing the Future We Want for All also recognized the fundamental role of effective governance capacities at national, local and municipal levels, including political commitment and leadership in implementing the post-2015 global development agenda. Another common thread highlighted throughout both documents is the importance of addressing the disparities that exist both within and between countries, a phenomenon growing ever-more acute in Asia and the Pacific as the region continues to accumulate great wealth. Democratic governance can ensure that the voices and interests of all people are represented and they can participate effectively in national and local decision-making critical to the success of the post-Millennium Development Goals agenda. Only the legal and economic empowerment of people, especially those most excluded, and of their civil society organizations, would put countries on a clear path to inclusive and sustainable development. ESCAP The dialogue at ESCAP has featured similar emphasis on governance. At the Distinguished Person Lecture held on UN Day 2012, Prof. Jeffrey Sachs strongly reaffirmed this position in speaking about the four pillars of sustainable development, stressing the need for good governance alongside economic prosperity, social inclusion and environmental sustainability. In addition to serving as the Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on the MDGs, Professor Sachs has been asked by the Secretary-General to direct the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, an independent network of research centres, universities and technical institutions which will work with stakeholders including business, civil society, UN agencies and other international organizations to identify and share the best pathways to achieve sustainable development.
34
Embed
ESCAP and Governance: the next steps Background …workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/ESCAP and...ESCAP and Governance: the next steps Background and Context In the interval
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ESCAP and Governance: the next steps
Background and Context
In the interval between the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (or
Rio+20) and the conclusion of the Millennium Development Goals, the international
community has been increasingly focused on – and giving greater prominence and
emphasis to – governance and ensuring that all peoples benefit from inclusive and
sustainable development in the post-2015 development agenda.
One key message from Rio+20 is the importance of effective governance through
democracy, good governance and the rule of law – at the local, national, regional and
global levels – for achieving sustainable development. Institutions are needed at all levels
that are effective, transparent, accountable and democratic in order to achieve sustainable
development goals. The report of the UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN
Development Agenda, Realizing the Future We Want for All also recognized the
fundamental role of effective governance capacities at national, local and municipal
levels, including political commitment and leadership in implementing the post-2015
global development agenda.
Another common thread highlighted throughout both documents is the importance of
addressing the disparities that exist both within and between countries, a phenomenon
growing ever-more acute in Asia and the Pacific as the region continues to accumulate
great wealth.
Democratic governance can ensure that the voices and interests of all people are
represented and they can participate effectively in national and local decision-making
critical to the success of the post-Millennium Development Goals agenda. Only the legal
and economic empowerment of people, especially those most excluded, and of their civil
society organizations, would put countries on a clear path to inclusive and sustainable
development.
ESCAP
The dialogue at ESCAP has featured similar emphasis on governance. At the
Distinguished Person Lecture held on UN Day 2012, Prof. Jeffrey Sachs strongly
reaffirmed this position in speaking about the four pillars of sustainable development,
stressing the need for good governance alongside economic prosperity, social inclusion
and environmental sustainability.
In addition to serving as the Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on the MDGs, Professor Sachs has
been asked by the Secretary-General to direct the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, an
independent network of research centres, universities and technical institutions which will work with
stakeholders including business, civil society, UN agencies and other international organizations to identify
and share the best pathways to achieve sustainable development.
Professor Sachs defined good governance as setting goals and plans for sustainable
development; corporate good governance, public provision of quality health, education
and infrastructure; and contributing to global problem solving. His remarks only
amplified what previous speakers in the series have also pointed out, most notably Nobel
Laureate Prof. Amartya Sen who famously said that famines do not occur in functioning
democracies.
Until now ESCAP has taken a low-key approach towards governance-related activities.
The time now is ripe to take cues from the Rio+20 and the post-2015 documents, as well
as the five-year action plan of the Secretary-General, to begin to integrate the governance
dimension more explicitly in the pursuit of sustainable development.
A mapping exercise of the work of ESCAP’s divisions and subregional offices with a
“governance” dimension revealed the following examples:
The 2011-2012 edition of the regional MDG report by ESCAP, ADB and UNDP
focused on “Accelerating equitable achievement of the MDGS: closing gaps in
health and nutrition outcomes.” (MPDD, SROs)
Projects to strengthen urban transport planning for urban transport systems, and
for transport to withstand impacts of climate change. (EDD)
An update of a study to analyze the governance structures at the local level, and
projects to assess the municipal governance and urban infrastructure of Central
Asian countries and to strengthen local governments in solid waste management.
(EDD)
The State of Cities Report 2010-2011, which extensively discusses governance,
emphasizing the need to improve governance to integrate the three pillars plus
resilience in urban development. (EDD)
The Asia-Pacific Disaster Report 2012 published by ESCAP and UNISDR
highlights the crucial role of disaster risk governance in reducing vulnerability
and exposure to hazards. (IDD, SROs)
The regional programme on the improvement of civil registration and vital
statistics, which is the underpinning of almost all government services, the
improvement of population statistics and the regional programme on economic
statistics. (SD, SROs)
The Working Group on Women, Peace and Security under the Regional
Cooperation Mechanism Thematic Working Group on Gender Equality and
Women’s Empowerment, which focuses on enhancing women’s participation in
peace processes and decision-making, particularly in conflict and post-conflict
affected areas. (SDD)
Other related activities include a review of work in the SPECA framework in support of
the regional economic cooperation conference on Afghanistan, which was held as a side-
event to the SPECA meetings in Bangkok. The meeting was an opportunity to emphasize
the importance of integrating Afghanistan’s economy into the rest of the Asia-Pacific
region, with a special emphasis on governance issues to ensure even and widespread
growth. (MPDD, North and Central Asia SRO/SPECA)
ESCAP is also co-organizing with the Government of Timor-Leste in February 2013 a
high-level international conference for the g7+ fragile states. The meeting will focus on
ways to ensure the 1.5 billion people living in fragile or conflict-affected States are not
left behind in the post-2015 development agenda. (OES)
At the same time, the Regional Coordination Mechanism and the UNDG Asia-Pacific are
having ongoing discussions on ways to strengthen synergies and collaboration, including
in the following areas:
Development of a joint UN strategic framework for development cooperation at
the regional level.
Strengthening of regional/national linkages through better use of regional
analytical and policy products at the country level, such as the preparation of
UNDAFs.
Focusing on concrete outputs as a basis for strengthening collaboration – e.g.,
updating and completing the RCM Rio+20 publication prepared by the TWG for
Poverty and Hunger and the TWG for Environment and Disaster Risk
Management.
Ways for the RCM to complement national consultations and global thematic
consultations planned on the post-2015 development agenda, especially in the
areas of MDG Goal 8; lessons from MDGs processes; and implementation of
SDGs and the development of SDG indicators.
A joint conference on supporting countries in transition is another possible area for
collaboration between the RCM and UNDG.
More specifically, ESCAP and UNDP recently met to share information about the
governance-related dimensions of their current work and to identify possible areas of
collaboration within their respective mandates. The two organizations agreed to a broad
set of principles to guide their collaboration as follows:
The added value of the regional commission is in providing an intergovernmental
platform for identifying and developing norms for various economic, social and
environmental sectors in the region, particularly to address issues of inequality in
the region.
UNDP’s added value lies in being able to work with countries to implement those
norms. At the same time, UNDP’s country-level experiences and best practices
can also feed upward into the regional process of developing norms and sharing
best practices.
The regional coordination mechanism (RCM) and its thematic working groups
could/should play a leading role in strengthening inter-agency collaboration on
the governance dimensions of work within the UN system.
ESCAP-UNDP collaboration can potentially help improve the quality of
resolutions adopted by the Commission by bringing more issues to the table,
addressing different aspects of those issues and making them more “practical” for
implementation by member States, thereby addressing the often missing link
between norm setting and the country programming process.
The issue of inequalities of a social, economic or environmental nature could
potentially provide an important interface point for ESCAP/UNDP collaboration
on the governance dimensions of their work.
Conclusion
As the outcome of Rio+20 and the discussions for the post-2015 development agenda
show, both member States and the United Nations system are paying greater attention to
the need to ensure economic growth, social equity and environmental sustainability not
only for the broadest segments of today’s society but also for generations that follow. For
the Asia-Pacific region, an emphasis on good governance can help to sustain the
remarkable development seen over the past two-and-a-half decades and close the ever-
widening gap between those at the top of the pyramid and those at the bottom,
particularly women, persons with disabilities, older persons and youth, as well as
between the rights of the people and the rights of the planet.
ESCAP is well-placed to lead this move to integrating governance issues more
prominently with efforts to promote inclusive and sustainable development in Asia and
the Pacific. An internal examination of its current programme of work identified
numerous activities that already carry a governance dimension. At the same time,
discussions with other UN agencies – either through the RCM or bilaterally with UNDP –
show several areas for possible collaboration. Working together could improve synergies
between the development of policies and norms at the regional level through the
intergovernmental conference structure and resolutions adopted by the Commission, and
implementation at the country level through work carried out by the UN agencies.
As for country-specific activities in addition to those already mentioned for Afghanistan
and Timor-Leste and the g7+ countries, the following could also be linked to ESCAP’s
subregional programmes: Myanmar (ASEAN) – OES/South-East Asia, MPDD; the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (Greater Tumen Initiative) – OES/East and
North-East Asia SRO, MPDD; and Iran (ECO) – South and South-West Asia SRO.
MINUTES Special Senior Management Team Meeting
on ESCAP/UNDP dialogue on governance collaboration
Thursday 15 November 2012 (14:30 – 16:00 hours) MR-E, UNCC
UNDP Participants:
Mr. Rathin Roy, Regional Manager Ms. Pauline Tamesis, Democratic Governance Practice Leader Ms. Thusitha Pilapitiya, Decentralization and Local Governance Advisor Ms. Sujala Pant, Regional Programme Specialist Ms. Antje Kraft, Justice and Human Rights Specialist Mr. Samuel De Jaegere, Regional Programme Analyst Mr. Harald Thorud, Programme Analyst Mr. Marcus Brand, Consultant ESCAP Participants:
Mr. Adnan Aliani (OES) Mr. Donald Clarke (PPD) Ms. Francyne Harrigan (SCAS) Mr. Mitchell Hsieh (OES) Ms. Laura Lopez (OES) Mr. Shun-ichi Murata (CHAIR) Ms. Nanda Krairiksh (SDD) Mr. Nagesh Kumar (videoconference) (SRO-SSWA) Mr. Nikolay Pomoshchnikov (videoconference) (SRO-NCA) Mr. Kilaparti Ramakrishna (SRO-ENEA) Mr. Ravi Ratnayake (TID) Ms. Shamika Sirimanne (IDD) Ms. Rikke Hansen OiC a.i. of SD Mr. Aynul Hasan OiC a.i. of MPDD Mr. Hongpen Liu OiC a.i. of EDD Mr. Irfan Rahim OiC a.i. of TD Ms. Maria Misovicova Programme Officer Apologies:
Mr. Anisuzzaman Chowdhury (MPDD) Mr. Rae Kwon Chung (EDD)
Ms. Haishan Fu (SD) Mr. Dong-woo Ha (TD) Ms. Noeleen Heyzer (OES) Mr. Iosefa Maiva (EPO) Mr. Robert Spaull Mr. Peter Van Laere (DA) Ms. Michele Von Rautenkranz Meeting Highlights:
ESCAP_Collaboration on Governance
UNDP_Democratic Governance
In his introductory remarks, the Deputy Executive Secretary expressed the hope that the session would pave the way for collaboration between ESCAP and UNDP in order to achieve tangible results for the next generation of activities as part of the post-2015 development and sustainable development agendas.
Mr. Roy agreed, adding that he hoped the meeting would close with some
ideas on how to take forward the partnership between the two organizations. He also emphasized that for UNDP, governance was defined as democratic governance rather than “good” governance, embedded in a human rights approach.
The meeting then heard presentations by Mr. Clarke and Ms. Tamesis on
the governance-related work carried out by ESCAP and UNDP, respectively. It was noted that exploratory discussions between the two organizations on possible areas for collaboration on governance (within their respective mandates) was included in the 2012 annual ESCAP/UNDP joint workplan.
In the ensuing discussion, the meeting identified the following principles
to guide collaboration between ESCAP and UNDP: The added value of the regional commission lies in providing an
intergovernmental platform for identifying and developing norms for various economic, social and environmental sectors in the region, particularly to address issues of inequality.
UNDP’s added value is in being able to work with countries to
implement those norms. At the same time, UNDP’s country-level experiences and best practices can also feed upward into the regional process of developing norms and sharing best practices. (Some good
examples of this process include ESCAP’s work on HIV and disabilities, where regional plans and strategies adopted by governments are implemented at the country level and monitored at the regional level).
The regional coordination mechanism and its thematic working groups
could/should play a leading role in strengthening inter-agency collaboration on the governance dimensions of work within the UN system.
ESCAP-UNDP collaboration can potentially help improve the quality
of resolutions adopted by the Commission as well as promote their implementation by member States, thereby addressing the often missing link between norm setting and the country programming process.
The issue of inequalities could potentially provide an important
interface point for ESCAP/UNDP collaboration on the governance dimensions of their work.
The following areas were identified as potential areas for collaboration: Data and statistical analysis on governance indicators (ESCAP’s
Statistics Committee is developing a core set of social statistics for the region, with governance indicators among them).
Gender mainstreaming in local government.
Urban issues and climate change Decentralization of responsibilities/good examples of effective local
governance systems for disaster risk reduction. Management of water and energy resources.
Trade policies.
Promoting dialogue among central and local governments and
investors.
Corporate governance to change the behaviour of the business sector.
Sectoral approaches to anti-corruption.
Norm setting in sectors not normally facilitated through the UN system (e.g. Ministries of Justice, electoral management bodies, national human rights bodies).
Youth.
Decision/Action: (a) It was agreed that ESCAP and UNDP would develop a matrix which pulls
together the discussion in a succinct form as the basis for further discussion on practical ways to develop collaboration in a small number of priority areas.
(b) The focal points for the two organizations for ongoing liaison will be Mr. Clarke (ESCAP) and Ms. Tamesis (UNDP).
TD Transport with Enhancing Sustainable and Building capacity in
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
ADB and KOTI
and partners
Inclusive Transport
Development in Asia
Working with partners to
leverage maximum resources
and influence to impact in
these areas
Integrated planning and
development of
transport infrastructure
and systems, transport
innovation and
transport operations
Link to
governance:
Low
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance Effectiveness
and
efficiency,
responsivenes
s
National
government
s
EDD Environment and
Development/Envi
ronment and
Development
Policies
Capacity development and
regional cooperation on
sustainable development to
achieve internationally agreed
development goals and to
implement the outcomes of
MCEDs
Cambodia -
Establishment of a
National Green Growth
Secretariat, an Inter-
ministerial Working
Group on Green
Growth and
development and
approval of a National
Green Growth
Roadmap;
Kazakhstan –
Establishment of an
Cambodia – a
National Green
Growth Committee
under the Prime
Minister under
development.
Implementation of
National Green
Growth Roadmap
on the way with
support from GGGI
Kazakhstan – The
report received
Link to
governance:
Medium
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance Effectiveness
and efficiency
National
Government
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
Inter-ministerial
Working Group on
Green Growth,
development of a Study
on Application of
Green Growth Policies;
highest recognition
from the President
of RKz and was
embedded in the
Inter-regional
Astana Green
Bridge Initiative:
Europe-Asia-Pacific
Partnership for
Green Growth
endorsed at MCED-
6 (October 2010)
EDD Environment and
Development/Envi
ronment and
Development
Policies
Low Carbon Green Growth
Roadmap
The Roadmap collects
and analyzes several
case studies from Asia
and the Pacific on
green growth,
including in terms of
institutional
arrangements and
governance and puts
forward
recommendations in
this regard.
Green growth
should be driven by
the top level of
Government
(President, Prime
Minister), through
an inter-Ministerial
Mechanism, backed
by a framework law
(in addition to
sectoral
regulations), as well
as by a concrete
budgetary allocation
(e.g. 2% of GDP).
Link to
governance:
Low
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance Effectiveness
and efficiency
National
Government
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
EDD Environment and
Development/Sust
ainable Urban
Development
Study on local government
systems
The study will update
previous studies made
by ESCAP and analyse
the governance
structures at the local
level in selected
countries in Asia and
the Pacific
A comparative
analysis exists and
will be updated
together with
updating 14 country
reports. The main
lessons are local
governments need
to be strengthened.
Link to
governance:
High
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects
National and
local
government
s, other
stakeholders
to a lesser
extent
EDD Environment and
Development/Sust
ainable Urban
Development
Sustainable urban
infrastructure development
The project will assess
the municipal
governance and urban
infrastructure of
Central Asian
countries. It will
especially look at the
capacities of local
governments in terms
of budget, management
and basic services
provisions.
Lessons were in
obtaining reliable
information and
data on governance
from local
authorities. We
learned that local
knowledge and
networks with
intermediaries are
essential for
assessing the
situation on the
ground.
Institutionalization
of information
gathering and
Link to
governance:
High
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects,
with an
emphasis on
effective and
efficient
National and
local
government
s,
academic/re
search/traini
ng
institutions
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
analysis of
governance
dimensions are
critical and needs to
improve in the
future.
EDD Environment and
Development/Sust
ainable Urban
Development
Pro-poor Solid Waste
Management
Project aims at
strengthening
institutional, financial
and human resources
capacities of local
governments in solid
waste management
Link to
governance:
High
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance Effectiveness
and
efficiency,
participation,
equity and
inclusiveness,
National and
local
government,
private
sector, civil
society
EDD Environment and
Development/Sust
ainable Urban
Development
State of Asian Cities Report I
& II
The reports have a full
chapter on governance.
The first report was
published in 2011. The
second will be
published in 2014
Link to
governance:
Medium
Most
relevant
National and
local
government
s,
academic/re
search and
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects
training
institutes
EDD Environment and
Development/Sust
ainable Urban
Development
Asia-Pacific Urban Forum The Asia-Pacific Urban
Forums are held once
every four years. The
Fifth AP Urban Forum
was held in 2011. The
Sixth AP Forum will
be held in 2015. The
Forums bring together
national and local
government
representatives, NGOs,
private sector
organizations and
research and training
organizations to
discuss urban issues
including those related
to governance. For
example the Fifth
Forum discussed issues
related to urban finance
and governance and the
role of new social
It is important to
provide a regional
platform for policy
dialogues for urban
stakeholders to
discuss critical and
emerging issues.
Link to
governance:
High
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects
All
stakeholders
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
media in creating
movements for change.
EDD Environment and
Development/Sust
ainable Urban
Development
Regional Consultative
Meeting on Good Urban
Governance
A regular meeting of
UN and Non UN
agencies working on
urban governance
issues to discuss and
coordinate
programmes. The
Meetings are convened
by ESCAP.
Link to
governance:
Medium
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects
UN and
non-UN
agencies
providing
assistance
IDD 5: Information,
communications
technology and
disaster risk
reduction
Asia-Pacific Disaster Report
2012
It has a governance
chapter to stress the
importance of good
governance in disaster
risk reduction
Good governance is
a key in land use,
environmental
management,
resource
management, etc.
Link to
governance:
Medium
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects
All major
stakeholders
IDD 5: Information,
communications
technology and
disaster risk
Asia-Pacific Regional
Disaster Statistics (proposed
future activity)
Standard setting and
commitment is a key to
success through a good
governance mechanism
--- Link to
governance:
High
National
government
s
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
reduction at the regional and
country level Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance Accountabilit
y and
transparency
IDD 5: Information,
communications
technology and
disaster risk
reduction
Making Provincial
Communities Safer Through
Disaster Risk Reduction in
Development (DRR-PC)
(financed by ESCAP Trust
Fund for Tsunami, Disaster
and Climate preparedness)
Strengthening both
national and regional
institutions and policy
as regards to disaster
risk reduction,
including
decentralization. Focus
on how to engage the
local communities and
secure financial
commitments from
local administrations.
Stronger results at
national than
provincial level.
Further provide
level empowerment
needed.
Link to
governance:
High
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance Effectiveness
and efficiency
National and
local
government
s, civil
society
organization
s
IDD 5: Information,
communications
technology and
disaster risk
reduction
Reducing risks of tsunami,
storm surges, large waves and
other natural hazards in low
elevation coastal zones
(financed by ESCAP Trust
Fund for Tsunami, Disaster
and Climate preparedness)
Focus on establishing
multi-stakeholder
mechanisms, linking
early warning
institutions with other
stakeholder
(agricultural, health
Promising results in
Maldives,
Myanmar, Thailand
and India. Project
ongoing.
Link to
governance:
High
Most
relevant
characteristi
National
government
s, local
government
s(?) and
civil
society(?)
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
and planning
departments). Good
governance for climate
adaptation and DRR.
cs of
governance Effectiveness
and
efficiency,
participation
IDD Strengthening ICT capacities
for disaster risk reduction and
development: addressing
information, knowledge and
policy gaps in Asia
(Development Account
Tranche 8)
Strengthened ICT capacities can help strengthen governance dimensions, particularly with regard to the open and transparent flow of information (see Rio+20 Outcome. Furthermore, social networking has taken root as a new form of communication with profound effects on the nature of expression and content exchange, As social networking has turned people from passive consumers of information to active
Link to
governance:
Medium
Most
relevant
characteristi
cs of
governance All aspects of
governance
All major
stakeholders
Division Subprogramme
(including
Regional
Institutions)
Programme/Project/Activity “Governance”
Dimensions
Lessons/Way
Forward
Classification Stakeholde
rs
producers of content, the internet has become pivotal to the communicative power of individuals and their plural values. This is having extensive effects on group dynamics, the formation of group ideologies and societal and institutional structures. The project analyzes the transformative impacts that is having on governance structures across societies of the region, and capacity development seminars will be held as well. The project will be jointly implemented by IDD and APCICT