EPIC systems vs Allscripts

Consultant Proposalby Gina D.

• 100+ Physicians FTE, 10 practices with 15 specialties

• North Dakota. Patients are increasing and expanding health practice.

• First implementation 1998 with McKesson practice partner.

• Need replacement of current EHR. Issues with capabilities and Software is inadequate for the practice.

Health Medical Associates

• Strategy “Rip and Replace”. Interoperable between departments

• CPOE,EHR Management Clinical Decision support, e-prescribing, workflow, data integrity, electronic forms, Mobile device support, platform support.

• Certified EHR vendor and provide training

Situational Analysis

• Implement to its 15 practices and specialties.

• Implementation can take up to 6 months to be fully integrated.

• EHR should be fast and use secure.

• Compatible with systems.

• Compliant to modern technology.

PLAN• Increase patient quality care• Attestation through Meaningful Use. • Improve clinical decision support • Exchange data through an

Interoperable system• Decrease waiting time• Increase net gross and revenues

Health Medical Associates

LOREM IPSUM

Data 1

Data 2

Strategic Planning

Identify risk Managemen

t

Turn over strategy

Create a Project

Overview and

Migration Path

Strategic Goals

Patient Data Capture Functions

Functional Multiple Users Simultaneously and office locations

Patient Data Management

Supports Growth Charts

E- Prescibing/ Ordering Function

Notification of drug interactions / indication checking

Enables processing refills and renewals

Customized workflows by provider / physician

Print out diverse documents from different screens

Generates Smart Lists (Add items as you type)

Record and Visualize Scan Images

Coding Update- Current diagnosis and procedure codes

Signing Authentication

Provide access online to patients to actual EHR- Patient Portals

Provide access to client education

Clinical Decision Support

Dictation - Speech voice recognition

Orders Management

Charting

Electronic Communication

321

evaluation of vendors

High/ Above Average - 3 Average/ Medium - 2 Below Average -1

Interoperability

FunctionalityTelemedicineTechnical support/ServiceTrainingAttestation through Meaningful UseAttractive InterfaceEasy of useGeneral

TOTAL WEIGHT 77 65

High/ Above Average - 3 Average/ Medium - 2 Below Average -1

1016 206

Data 4Data

1

Data 2

1016 206

Data 4Data

1

Data 2

1016 206

Data 4Data

1

Data 2

1016 206

Data 4Dat

a 1Data 2

1016 206

Data 4Data

1

Data 2

1016 206

Data 4Data

1

Data 2

1016 206

Data 4Data 1

Data 2

Workflowthrough structure

data

E-prescript

ionbrings errors

ProductFinancialBurden

Smart Phrases

Uses SipnusLab & Rad

EasyimplementationI-Cloud

Integrated

system for

history

Links through

web portal

Task to TaskCan take time

Time consumi

ng

Excellent trainingexpensiv

e

Platform can

be dysfunctional

Overlaps with

medication

reconciliation

e-prescripti

on difficult

Too many clicks

for single task

Not User

friendly interfac

e

Updates ICD-10

Difficult to

resolveissues

Difficult to

customization

Cover every

specialty

Does not

Nickel and

Dime

Market Share 2014

Provisional

Recommendations

• EPIC provides excellent features. Lacks of Interoperability.

• Downfall is the money burdensome for the organization. Product is not negotiable. Employees can loose positions.

• Competes with Epic.

• Certified vendor

• Budget wise-> More affordable

• Easy to implement

• Deployment web based

• Customization for each user

• Interoperable

• Excellent customer service

• Provide trainings.

• User- friendly

• Cloud based

• No maintenance

Health Medical Associates