Top Banner
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual Meeting Richmond, VA August 24, 2011
19

EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

chesna

EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency. Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual Meeting Richmond, VA August 24, 2011. Impact of Earthquake and Tsunami. Damage to the Reactors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

Mike Boyd, Senior Health PhysicistEPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor AirPresented at 2011 OAS Annual MeetingRichmond, VAAugust 24, 2011

Page 2: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

2

Impact of Earthquake and TsunamiDamage to the Reactors• Level 7 - "Major Accident" on International Nuclear Event Scale

– "A major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures"

– Loss of Cooling– Damage to Secondary Containment Vessels– Fuel Meltdown

Releases of Radiation to the Environment

• “More than several tens of thousands of terabequerels of I-131” – Air releases – Intentional Venting & Hydrogen Explosions– Ocean Releases – Intentional release of Cooling water & Leakage

http://www.dae.gov.in/daiichi/japan130411.pdf

Page 3: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

3

EPA Response• Emergency Operations Center

• Radiological Emergency Response Team

• Regional Response

• RadNet

– Fixed Network– Deployable Monitors– Precipitation Sampling– Milk Sampling– Drinking Water Sampling– Laboratory Analysis

• EPA Japan Incident Website: http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/

Page 4: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

4

National Radiation Monitoring System• EPA's RadNet monitors across the

US showed typical fluctuations in background radiation levels.

• Additional Deployable Monitors were sent to the Aleutian islands, Hawaii, Guam and Saipan to improve monitoring coverage for this event.

• The levels detected to date are far below levels of concern

Page 5: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

5

Air Monitoring Stations

Page 6: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

6

RadNet Deployable Monitors:

Fukushima Response

Nome

Juneau Nome

Saipan Guam

Page 7: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

7

Deployable Monitors

Page 8: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

8

Monitoring Results

• Why focus on Iodine-131?– Primary Component of Fukushima release

– Gaseous Phase• Transported Great Distance in Atmosphere

– Sensitivity• Easily detected and measured

– Clearly Illustrates impacts and trends

– Primary Source of Potential Exposure• Concern for uptake in child thyroid

Page 9: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

9

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Iodine – 131 in Precipitation – Post March 11, 2011All Locations

Date Collected

pCi/

L

Page 10: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

10

18-Mar-

11

19-Mar-

11

20-Mar-

11

21-Mar-

11

22-Mar-

11

23-Mar-

11

24-Mar-

11

25-Mar-

11

26-Mar-

11

27-Mar-

11

28-Mar-

11

29-Mar-

11

30-Mar-

11

31-Mar-

11

1-Apr-11

2-Apr-11

3-Apr-11

4-Apr-11

5-Apr-11

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3Charcoal Filters: Iodine-131 – Post March 11, 2011

(All Locations)

Date Sampled

Iodi

ne -1

31:

pCi/

L

Page 11: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

11

January

-05

April-05

July-05

October-0

5

January

-06

May-06

August-

06

November-0

6

February

-07

June-07

September-0

7

December-0

7

March-08

June-08

October-0

8

January

-09

April-09

July-09

November-0

9

February

-10

May-10

August-

10-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

Iodine in Drinking Water: Pre-March 11, 2011(All Locations: 2005-2011 in pCi/L)

Page 12: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

12

21-Mar-

11

23-Mar-

11

25-Mar-

11

27-Mar-

11

29-Mar-

11

31-Mar-

11

2-Apr-11

4-Apr-11

6-Apr-11

8-Apr-11

10-Apr-11

12-Apr-11

14-Apr-11

16-Apr-11

18-Apr-11

20-Apr-11

0

5

10

15

20

I-131 in Milk Post-March 11, 2011(All Locations)

Date Collected

pCi/

L

FDA DIL: 4,700 pCi/L

Page 13: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

13

Page 14: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

14

Page 15: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

15

Page 16: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

16

Page 17: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

17

Page 18: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

18

Comparing Chernobyl Data to Current Event Data

Highest I-131 in milk

Highest I-131 in air Highest I-131 in rain

Chernobyl 1986

136 pCi/L Spokane

1.6 pCi/m3 Boise & Phoenix

6,620 pCi/L Spokane

Japan 2011

18 pCi/L Hilo, HI

0.84 pCi/m3 Boise

390 pCi/L Boise

Page 19: EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency

19

What is Additional Risk from Fukushima?

• Trace levels of radioactive isotopes measured are consistent with the Japanese nuclear incident and far below levels of public health concern.

• Additional exposure from well below 1 mrem for individuals in US and Territories

• Measured levels hundreds to thousands of times lower than FDA Derived Intervention Levels (DILS)

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/understand/perspective.html