Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report No. 1 March 2020 PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Volume II September 2019 – March 2020 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
180
Embed
Environmental Monitoring Report · SMR – Self-Monitoring Report SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement STPP – Sucat Thermal Power Plant SWMP – Solid Waste Management Plan TIA –
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Environmental Monitoring Report
Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report No. 1 March 2020
PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Volume II
September 2019 – March 2020
Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr)
for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 March 2020)
Currency unit – Philippine Peso (PHP)
PHP1.00 = $0.02 $1.00 = PHP50.96
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB – Asian Development Bank BMB – Biodiversity Management Bureau Brgy – Barangay CCA – Climate Change Adaptation CCC – Climate Change Commission CDC – Clark Development Corporation CEMP – Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan CENRO – City/Community Environment and Natural Resources Office CIA – Clark International Airport CIAC – Clark International Airport Corporation CLLEx – Central Luzon Link Expressway CLUP – Comprehensive Land Use Plan CMR – Compliance Monitoring Report CMVR – Compliance Monitoring and Validation Report CNO – Certificate of No Objection CPDO – City Planning and Development Office DAO – DENR Administrative Order DD / DED – Detailed Design Stage / Detailed Engineering Design Stage DENR – Department of Environment and Natural Resources DepEd – Department of Education DIA – Direct Impact Area DILG – Department of Interior and Local Government DOH – Department of Health DOST – Department of Science and Technology DOTr – Department of Transportation DPWH – Department of Public Works and Highways DSWD – Department of Social Welfare and Development DTI – Department of Trade and Industry EA – Executing Agency ECA – Environmentally Critical Area ECC – Environmental Compliance Certificate ECP – Environmentally Critical Project EGF – Environmental Guarantee Fund EHS – Environmental Health and Safety EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EIS – Environmental Impact Statement EISR – Environmental Impact Statement Report EMB – Environmental Management Bureau EMF – Environmental Monitoring Fund EMoP – Environmental Monitoring Plan EMP – Environmental Management Plan
ENRO – Environment and Natural Resources Officer EQPL – Environmental Quality Performance Level ERA – Environmental Risk Assessment ERP – Emergency Response Plan ESRD – Environment, Social and ROW Division EU – Environmental Unit FAM – Facility Administration Manual FMB – Forest Management Bureau GAF – Grievance Action Form GCR – Greater Capital Region GPS – Global Positioning System GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism IEC – Information Education and Communication IEE – Initial Environmental Examination IFC – International Finance Corporation IIA – Indirect Impact Area IRR – Implementing Rules and Regulations ISF – Informal Settler Families JDT – JICA Design Team JICA – Japan International Cooperation Agency LGU – Local Government Unit LIAC – Local Inter-Agency Committee LRT – Light Rail Transit LRTA – Light Rail Transit Authority MCLUPZO – Manila City Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning
Ordinance MCRP – Malolos Clark Railway Project MCRRS – Manila-Clark Rapid Railways System MENRO – Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Office MGB – Mines and Geosciences Bureau MMDA – Metro Manila Development Authority MMSP – Metro Manila Subway Project MMT – Multipartite Monitoring Team MNTC – Manila North Tollways Corporation MOA – Memorandum of Agreement MPDO – Municipal Planning and Development Office MRT – Metro Rail Transit NAMRIA – National Mapping and Resource Information Authority NCCA – National Commission for Culture and the Arts NCR – National Capital Region NECP – Non-Environmentally Critical Project NGO – Non-Government Organization NHA – National Housing Authority NHCP – National Historical Commission of the Philippines NLEX – North Luzon Expressway NLRC – North Luzon Railways Corporation NM – National Museum NSCR – North South Commuter Railway Project NSCR EX – North South Commuter Railway Extension Project
NSRP – North South Railway Project NTP – Notice to Proceed ODA – Overseas Development Assistance OSH – Occupational Safety and Health PAF – Project Affected Families PAP – Project Affected Persons PD – Presidential Decree PEISS – Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System PEMAPS – Project Environmental Monitoring and Audit Prioritization
Scheme PENRO – Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office PEPRMP – Programmatic Environmental Performance Report and
Management Plan PH – Public Hearing PMO – Project Management Office PNP – Philippine National Police PNR – Philippine National Railways PNSC – Philippine National Structural Code PO – People Organizations PPE – Personal Protective Equipment PRI – Philippine Railway Institute RA – Republic Act RAP – Resettlement Action Plan RHU – Rural Health Unit RIC – RAP Implementation Committee ROW – Right-of-Way SB – Sangguniang Bayan SCPW – Society for the Conservation of Philippine Wetlands Inc. SCTEX – Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressway SDP – Social Development Plan SMR – Self-Monitoring Report SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement STPP – Sucat Thermal Power Plant SWMP – Solid Waste Management Plan TIA – Traffic Impact Assessment TMS – Train Management System TOR – Terms of Reference UNDP – United Nations Development Program UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization
NOTE{S}
(i) In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Appendix C: External Monitoring Agent Terms of Reference
PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
TERMS OF REFERENCE CONSULTANCY SERVICE TO UNDERTAKE THE EXTERNAL MONITORING OF THE
RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING UNDER THE NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(“NSCR-EX”) PROJECT A. Background 1. The Government of the Philippines (“GoP”) has requested Japan International Cooperation Agency (“JICA”) and the Asian Development Bank (“ADB”) for assistance in the development and implementation of the 109-kilometer North-South Commuter Railway Extension (“NSCR-EX,” hereinafter the “Project”), which extends north and south of the first phase of the North-South Commuter Railway System (hereinafter the “NSCR Phase 1” which will run from Tutuban, Manila to Malolos, Bulacan). Aside from the provision of an improved and efficient access to international airports, the completion of the Project is expected to contribute to the sustainable development of the National Capital Region and of the fast-growing urban areas in Region 3 and 4-A. 2. The north extension of the Project, the NSCR - Clark Extension (also known as the Malolos-Clark Railway Project, hereinafter the “MCRP”), spans 51 kilometers, beginning from Malolos, Bulacan to Clark International Airport, Pampanga (49 kilometers to run on a viaduct, 2 kilometers underground). The MCRP has a total of six (6) stations and one (1) 33-hectare depot. 3. The south extension of the Project, the NSCR - Calamba Extension (also known as the South Commuter Railway Project, hereinafter the “SCRP”), on the other hand, stretches to a total length of 64.2 kilometers. The said length comprises of the 58.6-kilometer long aboveground tracks from Solis Station of the NSCR Phase 1, Manila to Calamba, Laguna and the 5.6-kilometer segment connecting the Senate Station of the Metro Manila Subway Project (“MMSP”) to the FTI and Bicutan Stations of the SCRP (4.8-kilometers underground between Senate Station of the MMSP and FTI Station of the SCRP, 0.8-kilometers aboveground between FTI and Bicutan Stations of the SCRP). The SCRP has a total of nineteen (19) stations and one (1) 22-hectare depot. 4. The Project will be assisted by a grant from JICA and will be co-financed by the ADB. ADB will finance the main civil works, while JICA will finance electromechanical and rolling stock systems1. 5. The Department of Transportation (“DOTr”) is the implementing agency. During the implementation of the Project, the DOTr, through the NSCR-EX Project Management Office (“PMO”) and its General Consultant (“GC”), must put in place a monitoring system that will:
a) Monitor Resettlement Action Plan (“RAP”) implementation, verify internal monitoring information and provide a review and assessment of: (i) achievement of the resettlement objectives; (ii) changes in living standards and livelihoods; (iii) restoration and/or improvement of the economic and social base of the affected
people; (iv) effectiveness and sustainability of entitlements; and (v) the need for further mitigation measures;
1 Integrated Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the South Commuter Rail Project (SCRP).
b) Monitor compliance with the environment safeguard requirements of the Project, as defined in the environmental impact statement report (“EISR”), the environmental management plans (“EMP”) and environmental monitoring plans (“EMoP”) approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (“DENR”) Environmental Management Bureau – Central Office (“EMB-CO”) and cleared by ADB2 and JICA.
6. DOTr shall conduct internal monitoring to track the progress of the delivery of physical and financial targets, resettlement assistance and other entitlements, and environmental management, whereas the External Monitoring Agency (“EMA”) shall carry out independent External Monitoring (“EM”) (i) to assess the effects and impacts of the RAP implementation and the extent to which RAP objectives are being achieved and (ii) to assess the implementation of the EMP and the EMoP, the environmental contractual obligations, and the impacts of the EMP and the EMoP implementation and the extents to which environmental management objectives are being achieved. 7. Monitoring and evaluation measures are designed (i) to ensure the resettlement plan complies with the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (“SPS”) concerning involuntary resettlement and (ii) to ensure the implementation of the EMP and the EMoP complies with the ADB SPS concerning environment and health and safety. DOTr requires a qualified and experienced EMA to:
a) Under RAP Implementation (i) Provide external monitoring of the RAP implementation, (ii) Assess or evaluate how effectively project and resettlement objectives are
being met (iii) Recommend necessary corrective measures when shortcomings are observed
b) Under Environmental Management and Monitoring Implementation including Health
and Safety
(i) Provide external monitoring of the EMP and EMoP implementation, (ii) Assess or evaluate the effectiveness in meeting project environment and health
and safety objectives (iii) Recommend necessary corrective measures when non-compliances or
shortcomings are observed B. Objectives of the External Monitoring 1. The main objectives of the EM are:
a) To provide independent periodic reviews on RAP and EMP and EMoP implementation through the External Monitoring Reports (“EMR”)
b) To assess the RAP implementation, including provision of compensation and
assistance and implementation of the resettlement plan and the Livelihood Restoration and Improvement Program (“LRIP”). Specifically, the objectives include:
2 References to this requirement: (i) Paragraph 1849, Section 10.1.9 Third Party Monitor – External Environmental Monitor, Updated Environmental Impact Statement for North-South Commuter Railway (NSCR) Clark Extension Project), December 2019; (ii) Paragraph 68, Facility Administration Manual (Project No. 52093-001) MCRP, April 2019; and (iii) Paragraph 14(c), Schedule 4 of Loan Agreement (Ordinary Operations) between the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank, Loan Number 3796-PHI dated 11 July 2019.
(i) Assess the extent to which the standards of living of Project-Affected Persons (“PAPs”) are restored or improved
(ii) Monitor and evaluate whether the overall project and resettlement objectives are being met in accordance with the RAP, and if not, suggest corrective measures
(iii) Assess if rehabilitation measures and compensation are sufficient and comply with the policies and entitlements set out in the RAP
(iv) Identify problems or potential problems (v) Identify methods of responding timely to mitigate and resolve problems
c) To assess if various EMP and EMoP provisions in the works contractors’ contracts as
well as the work contractors’ site-specific construction EMPs (“CEMPs”) are being implemented as required, and in compliance with the Environmental Compliance Certificate (“ECC”) conditions;
d) To verify all information provided by DOTr in the ADB Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report (“SEMR”) and Semi-annual RAP Monitoring Report (“SRMR”), JICA Quarterly Monitoring Report (“QMR”), and in the Compliance Monitoring Report (“CMR”) of the EMB-CO.
2. In order to achieve these objectives, the EMA will:
a) Carry out an impact assessment of the RAP implementation as a means to determine the extent to which it has achieved its goals in addition to evaluating the livelihood and living standards of the physically displaced households both pre- and post-relocation
b) Document the perspectives of affected persons' view on resettlement, compensation, and grievance redress procedures
c) In case of economic displacement, appraise the post-resettlement economic status of
the displaced households, especially the vulnerable groups
d) Carry out an independent assessment of the EMP and EMoP and CEMP implementation as a means to determine the extent to which it has achieved its goals
3. The EMA will identify best practices that will facilitate the successful implementation of the RAP and EMP and EMoP through the preparation of the EMR. 4. The EMR will also highlight challenges encountered that will be valuable in the formulation of corrective measures to enable effective implementation of the RAP and the EMP and EMoP. Lessons learned will guide the development of effective strategies useful in future formulation of RAP and of the EMP and EMoP. C. Scope of Works 1. The key activities to be conducted during the EM shall consist of the following activities:
a) RAP Implementation (i) Verify results of internal monitoring undertaken by the DOTr and assess
adequacy of the process including replacement cost study and suggest any improvement measures as required;
(ii) Assess the extent to which consultation and disclosure activities are inclusive, accessible, and effective in conveying key information from the RAP as well as
provide conditions for PAPs to contribute to decision-making which affects them such as resettlement and livelihood restoration;
(iii) Verify that compensation and assistance has been provided in accordance with the requirements of the RAP through sample checking and consultation with stakeholders including PAPs;
(iv) Verify whether the implementing agency has explained restrictions pertaining to easement agreements including the right of refusal and that the PAPs are able to exercise allowable usage of the land subject to the easement agreement;
(v) Assess whether resettlement objectives are achieved, specifically, whether livelihood and living standards have been restored or enhanced;
(vi) Assess adequacy of resettlement implementation, especially resettlement housing;
(vii) Assess appropriateness and effectiveness of the LRIP, accessibility of eligible PAPs to the LRIP activities, and the program's effectiveness in restoring incomes and livelihoods at the household level;
(viii) Ascertain whether the social safeguards document or plan entitlements were appropriate to meet the objectives, and whether the objectives were suited to PAP conditions;
(ix) Suggest modification in the implementation procedures of the social safeguards’ document or plan, if necessary, to achieve the principles and objectives of the RAPs and resettlement frameworks;
(x) Review the method of calculation of compensation rates and assess whether it adequately meets the replacement cost and follows the policies and entitlements set out in the RAP;
(xi) Review the effectiveness of the Grievance Redress Mechanism (“GRM”), its accessibility and its responsiveness to resolving complaints;
(xii) Review of the implementation arrangements of the RAP and LRIP; (xiii) Recommend actions that will enable achievement of the RAP objectives and
resolve problems through the Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”); (xiv) Prepare and submit to DOTr, JICA, and ADB the periodic EMR for review and
disclosure in the DOTr, JICA, and ADB project websites; (xv) Temporary impacts due to construction will be monitored and reported as part
of monitoring of the EMP and reflected in the required EMA monitoring reports.
b) EMP and EMoP Implementation
(i) Verify results of the internal monitoring and supervision undertaken by the DOTr and assess adequacy of the process and suggest any improvement measures as required;
(ii) Verify compliance of DOTr with the conditions stipulated in the ECCs granted to the Project;
(iii) Conduct site visits and assess works contractors’ compliance with the EMP and EMoP and their CEMP. Such assessment shall include environmental management as well as health and safety performance and compliance with the EMP and the EMoP and the Philippines legal and regulatory framework;
(iv) Assess the adequacy of the EMP and the EMoP implementation and identify necessary corrective actions, as needed;
(v) Review and assess adequacy of the institutional arrangements and capacities of DOTr, the GC, and the works contractors in the implementation of the EMP and the EMoP;
(vi) Assess the extent to which consultation and information disclosure activities are inclusive, accessible, and effective in conveying key information from the EIS, EMP, and the EMoP as well as provide conditions for stakeholders to
contribute to decision making which affects them such as pre-construction, construction, and operational impacts;
(vii) Assess the works contractor’s construction safety performance, including safety provisions for workers and communities, construction safety procedures, protocols, and record, and emergency preparedness and response procedures;
(viii) Assess the effectiveness of the GRM and its accessibility and responsiveness to resolving complaints;
(ix) Conduct key stakeholder interviews, as required, to substantiate observations and identify meaningful corrective actions;
(x) Review contractor’s system and performance with regard to core labor standards, the Philippines Labor Code, and other relevant laws and regulations;
(xi) Recommend actions to resolve on-site environmental problems through the CAP;
(xii) Prepare the periodic EMR following the prescribed format and/or guidelines of JICA, ADB, and EMB-CO;
(xiii) Submit the periodic EMR to DOTr, JICA, ADB, and EMB-CO for review and disclosure in respective project websites.
D. Methodology 1. The methods for external RAP monitoring activities include, but not limited to, the following:
a) Review of the RAP prepared during the Detailed Design (“DD”) phase;
b) Review of the detailed measurement survey (“DMS”) documents to establish a baseline for monitoring and evaluating project benefits. The EMA will check on a random basis the DMS process with PAPs from identification to agreement on DMS results. All survey data shall be disaggregated by gender;
c) Review of the socio-economic survey (“SES”) baseline prepared during RAP
preparation and updating (following DD).3 Sampling will include 20% of severely affected PAPs for the Project and 10% of all other PAPs. As much as possible, the same PAPs interviewed during RAP updating will be interviewed for each subsequent monitoring exercise.
d) Conduct of Participatory Rapid Appraisals (“PRA”). The PRA will involve obtaining
information, identifying existing or potential problems, and finding specific time-bound solutions through participatory means including (i) consultations with PAPs and various stakeholders such as a resettlement committee, the PMO, and community leaders, (ii) key informant interviews, (iii) focus group discussions, and (iv) community public meetings;
e) Conduct of direct field observations to document the status of resettlement
implementation from the perspectives of the PAPs and other key stakeholders involved in the RAP implementation;
f) Conduct case studies of displaced persons or communities of various socio-economic
groups to assess impact of resettlement and effectiveness and RAP mitigation measures;
3 SES was carried out by JICA Design Team (“JDT”) in parallel with DMS during RAP updating.
g) Document lessons learned in using international best practices for replacement cost valuation as stipulated in the project principles and implementation experiences of DOTr;
h) Verify the Replacement Cost Study (“RCS”). The EMA will review the adequacy of
methodologies and standards for determining compensation rates prior to RAP implementation as well as subsequently review the ability of PAPs to replace affected assets with the compensation received. The EMA will review Independent Property Appraiser’s (“IPA”) reports, Government Financing Institution (“GFI”) reports, and internal monitoring reports to confirm if replacement cost values have been applied. The review of PAPs’ ability to replace affected assets will include (i) the ability of PAPs to purchase comparable land or assets by the compensation received, (b) the location of replacement land and distance from affected land, and (c) any assistance and inputs which PAPs need to find suitable replacement land;
i) Review of the effectiveness of the GRM and the status of grievance resolution. This
will include interviews with PMO and organizations responsible for GRM implementation, review GRM documentation, and gathering information from interviews with PAPs on accessibility and effectiveness of the GRM4;
j) Review of the effectiveness of the consultation processes conducted during project
preparation and implementation. The EMA will review the meaningful consultations conducted with the PAPs and review the completeness and timeliness of information provided and whether the process was inclusive or not. The EMA will also review the consultation process for determining housing and livelihood options including whether PAPs had adequate opportunity to present their ideas and suggestions;
k) Conduct of resettlement audit during monitoring. The EMA will carry out random
checks of payment disbursed to PAPs during monitoring. The EMA will submit the Resettlement Audit Report (“RAR”) upon completion of compensation payment to PAPs.
2. The methodology for external environmental monitoring shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following:
a) Review of the EIS, EMP, and EMoP prepared during the DD phase of the Project;
b) Familiarize with the project requirements and the scope of work of the Project’s GC and contractors;
c) Conduct site visits and interviews with the Project stakeholders including but not
necessarily limited to local officials, relevant NGOs, residents along identified sensitive receptors, and other stakeholders identified in the EIS;
d) Verify the information included in the SEMR and CMR submitted by the DOTr to ADB
and JICA and to EMB-CO;
e) Determine if the EMP and the EMoP provisions in the contractors’ contracts are being implemented properly and prepare an action plan to address identified issues;
f) Recommend corrective actions to address the gaps in the EMP implementation;
4 The EMA is not expected to purposely target interview cases undergoing the GRM process from information obtained through review of GRM documentation unless specifically requested by DOTr.
g) Prepare and submit the EMR to the DOTr, ADB, JICA, and EMB-CO on a semi-annual basis (i.e. upon availability of each internal semi-annual monitoring report) throughout the construction phase and during the first year of project operation.
E. Deliverable, Time Schedule and Reporting5 Requirements 1. The EMA will be mobilized for the Project on a semi-annual basis throughout the construction phase until the first year of Project operation. The EMA shall submit the following reports simultaneously to DOTr, ADB, and JICA:
a) Inception report. The report shall provide details of its work plan, schedule and staffing, site visits, monitoring methodology, presentation of monitoring indicators, and proposed reporting template for quarterly reports following validation of the indicators presented in Annexes IV-A and IV-B of this terms of reference. This report will be reviewed by DOTr, ADB, and JICA prior to finalization and the commencement of the first semi-annual external monitoring.
b) Semi-annual External RAP Monitoring Report. The monitoring report will present the
monitoring results, recommendations, and records of consultations. The presented information shall relate to the agreed monitoring indicators and be disaggregated as appropriate.
The report shall detail (i) the assessment on the extent to which the RAP implementation is compliant with the requirements set out in the RAP, (ii) the progress in achieving RAP objectives, and (ii) the recommended CAP as appropriate.
The EMA is required to describe any outstanding actions which are required to bring resettlement activities in line with the RAP and further mitigation measures to meet the needs of any PAPs recognized and/or self-perceived to be worse off in the aftermath of Project implementation. When the living standards of the PAPs are not improved or become worse, or their present means of livelihood become unviable, the DOTr, in coordination with other appropriate institutions, will provide the necessary assistance.
The report will verify information provided in the NSCR-EX PMO’s internal monitoring reports and RAP completion reports (including upon completion of disbursement and compensation and assistance of any given section to be handed over for civil works, following completion of resettlement sites and following completion of relocation). The evaluations in the report will assess progress on the extent to which living standards and livelihoods of PAPs are viable and meet at least national minimum standards in accordance with the agreed monitoring indicators and reporting formats. The assessments will indicate the appropriateness of the assistance provided and whether DOTr needs to modify the assistance to enable achievement of these objectives. The report will also feature case studies, and the results will be presented in meetings or workshops.
c) Resettlement Audit or Evaluation Report/Project Completion Report. The post-
completion report will be produced in 6 to 12 months following Project completion or loan closing. The report will present an evaluation on the extent of the RAP implementation’s compliance with the RAP requirements and ADB and JICA policy
5 Separate external monitoring reports for RAP and Environment; and separate external monitoring reports for MCRP and SCRP.
requirements and the extent to which the objectives of the RAP have been achieved. It will feature the evaluation of the RAP and LRIP implementation for the Project. The report shall also describe any lessons learned that might be useful for future activities.
d) Semi-annual External Environmental Monitoring Report. The monitoring report will
present the monitoring results, evaluations or assessments, recommendations, and records of consultations. The presented information shall relate to the agreed monitoring indicators and be disaggregated as appropriate.
(i) Status of project implementation; (ii) Methodologies used to undertake external environmental monitoring (e.g., site
observations, review of monitoring reports and other related documents, consultations and interviews with affected people, executing agency, contractors, supervision consultant, and other stakeholders);
(iii) Review and verification of the accuracy, breadth, depth, and relevance of information provided by DOTr to ADB, JICA, and EMB-CO with regard to the EMP and EMoP implementation as contained in the internal semi-annual environmental monitoring reports;
(iv) Review and verification of the implementation of the overall environmental safeguards objectives, if the said objectives (covering environment and health and safety) have been met in accordance with the EMP and EMoP;
(v) Assessment of DOTr’s and relevant agencies’ compliance with the EMP and EMoP provisions (mitigation, monitoring, reporting, etc.); if these are being conducted in a thorough and timely manner and in accordance with the budget identified within the EMP;
(vi) Assessment of the performance of the following with regard to implementation of various provisions of the EMP (such as those which pertain to mitigation, monitoring, reporting, etc.):
a. DOTr, as the implementing agency b. NSCR-EX PMO c. Construction supervision consultant d. Works contractors
(vii) In connection with the assessment results in Item (6) above, recommend
corrective actions required (i.e. capacity-building, staffing, etc.); (viii) Identification of current and potential environmental and health and safety
issues or problems; (ix) Time-bound action plan to address identified issues and to ensure compliance
with the EMP and the EMoP; (x) Other relevant information to support the findings (minutes of meetings, photo-
documentation, etc.)
e) Environment Audit/Evaluation Report/Project Completion Report. The post-completion report will be produced in 6 to 12 months following project completion or loan closing. The report will present an evaluation on the extent of the implementation’s compliance with the Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System (“PEISS”), ADB, and JICA safeguard policy requirements and the extent to which the objectives of the Project EMP and EMoP have been achieved. It will feature the evaluation of the EMP and the EMoP implementation performance of the Project. The report shall also describe any lessons learned that might be useful for future activities.
2. The deliverables and corresponding time schedule for external monitoring are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Deliverable, Time Schedule, and Reporting Requirement
6-12 months after project completion or loan closing
EMA ⇒ DOTr, ADB and JICA
F. Team Composition and Qualification Requirement 1. The EMA shall be an independent firm or qualified NGO with proven capacity and experience in monitoring and evaluating:
a) RAP and LRIP implementation, as well as conducting qualitative and quantitative research
b) EMP and EMoP implementation of infrastructure projects 2. The EMA is required to have working experience in the Philippines and should be familiar with the requirements of the PEISS. 3. Experts to be engaged by the firm or qualified NGOs should not have been and shall not be involved in the Project’s RAP, EMP, and EMoP implementation and supervision, regular environmental monitoring activities, preparation of semi-annual internal monitoring reports, and other activities of the DOTr and the GC. Furthermore, the EMA to be procured is not in any way affiliated with the DOTr and the GC. 4. The minimum key positions required shall be one (1) Team Leader, four (4) Monitoring and Evaluation (“M&E”) Specialists, two (2) Social Development Specialists, one (1) licensed Real Estate Appraiser, one (1) Sub-team Leader or Key Environment Specialist, and three (3) Environment Specialists as shown in Table 2. The EMA, nevertheless, may propose a change
in the composition of the team in order to successfully implement undertakings of external monitoring.
Table 2. Team Composition
Position Number Team Leader or Senior Land Acquisition and Resettlement Specialist 1
Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist 4
Social Development Specialist 2
Licensed Real Estate Appraiser 1
Deputy Team Leader or Key Environment Specialist 1
Environmental, Health and Safety Specialists (N2 – SC) 3
Total 12
5. The minimum qualifications and experience for the Team Leader are the following:
a) At least a Master`s Degree in Anthropology, Sociology, or any other relevant degrees in social science or commensurate professional experience;
b) At least 10 years of working experience in land acquisition and resettlement activities,
community development, or social safeguard compliance;
c) Strong knowledge about safeguard policies of ADB and JICA;
d) Must have the ability to hold discussions both with the decision-makers and at the grassroots; and
e) Good communication and reporting skills including fluency in English, Filipino, and a
local language (if required) to the DOTr, ADB and JICA. 6. For the other specialists, the following are required qualifications and experience:
a) At least a university degree in Anthropology, Sociology, or any other relevant degrees in social science or commensurate professional experience;
b) For the real estate appraiser, the individual has to be licensed and have a relevant
university degree such as in engineering, accounting, or other related fields. The individual should have at least five (5) years of relevant work experience in the Philippines;
c) At least five (5) years of working experience in M&E, participatory community
development, and gender and development projects;
d) Strong knowledge about qualitative and quantitative action-oriented research methods including consultation procedures, focus group discussion, data collection and structured interview techniques; and
e) Good communication and reporting skills including fluency in English, Filipino, and a
local language (if required) to the DOTr, ADB, and JICA. 7. The minimum qualifications and experience of the Deputy Team Leader/Key Environment Specialist shall be as follows:
a) At least a Master’s degree in the field of environmental management, environmental science, environmental engineering, or other related courses;
b) At least ten (10) years of working experience in environmental management and
monitoring and/or supervision of the EMP and the EMoP implementation for major infrastructure projects;
c) Strong knowledge on safeguard policies of the ADB, JICA, and PEISS, as well as the
Philippines Rule 1030 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards (“OSHS”) and the DOLE Department Order No. 13, s. 1998: Guidelines Governing Safety and Health in the Construction Industry; and
d) Good communication and reporting skills including fluency in English, Filipino, and a
local language (if required) to the DOTr, ADB, and JICA. 8. For the other environmental EM team member specialists, the following qualifications and experience are required:
a) At least a university degree in the field of environmental management, environmental science, environmental engineering, or other related courses;
b) At least five (5) years of working experience in environmental management and
monitoring and/or supervision of the EMP and the EMoP implementation on major infrastructure projects;
c) Strong knowledge on safeguard policies of the ADB, JICA, and the PEISS, as well as
the Philippines Rule 1030 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards (“OSHS”) and the DOLE Department Order No. 13, s. 1998: Guidelines Governing Safety and Health in the Construction Industry; and
d) Good communication and reporting skills including fluency in English, Filipino, and a
local language (if required) to the DOTr, ADB, and JICA. G. Duration of the Services 1. The services of the EMA will be procured by the DOTr through its GC. Based on the project implementation schedule, the monitoring schedule for the EMA is expected to commence from 1st June 2020 up to 31st December 2028 on a semi-annual basis. The detailed EMA work schedule can be found in Annex I. H. Criteria for EMA Selection The potential Consultant shall be evaluated for selection based on the following criteria:
Table 3 Criteria for EMA Selection
Criteria Point I. Technical Aspect 70 - Experience in conducting M&E and external
environmental monitoring - Example of M&E modules and environmental
monitoring reporting system
20
20
- Experience with ADB- or JICA- or World Bank-funded project resettlement, environmental management and monitoring plans implementation or monitoring particularly in the railway and transport infrastructure sector
20
- Experience with coaching and capacity building of implementing agencies in the M&E and environmental monitoring
10
II. Financial Aspect 30
Total 100
[Annex I] North South Commuter Railway Map
Figure 1. PROJECT MAP – N2 (Malolos to Clark) and SC (Solis to Calamba)
[Annex II] Work Schedule for External Monitoring Agency (Project Work Schedule)
Monitoring Item Potential Indicator Delivery of Entitlements
Entitlements provided in light of the scale and category of losses set out in the entitlement matrix
Status of disbursement in light of the planned schedule Identification of PAPs losing land temporarily, for example,
through soil disposal and the setup of borrow pits and contractors` camps
Timely disbursement of the agreed transport costs, relocation costs, and any resettlement allowances as well as timely provision of income substitution support in light of the planned schedule
Provision of replacement land plots Quality of new plots and issuance of entitlements such as land
titles, resettlement contracts, and other agreements Restoration of social infrastructure and services Progress on income and livelihood restoration activities
implemented as set out in the income restoration plan, for example, the status of replacement land utilization, commencement of production, the number of trained PAPs who land jobs, disbursed microcredit loan amounts, and the number of assisted income-generating activities
Consultation and Grievances Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings,
groups, and community activities Knowledge of PAPs on entitlements Utilization of the GRM by PAPs Information on the status of grievance resolution Information on the implementation during the social preparation
phase Implementation of special measures for indigenous peoples if any
Communications and Participation
Number of general meetings organized for both men and women Percentage of women out of total participants Number of meetings exclusively with women Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups Number of meetings at relocation sites Number of meetings between host community residents and
relocating PAPs Participation rate of women, men, and vulnerable groups for
meetings
Monitoring Item Potential Indicator Level of communicated information – adequate or inadequate Disclosed information Translation of disclosed information in local languages
Budget and Time Frame
Number of appointed and mobilized staff in charge of land acquisition and resettlement on schedule for field and office works
Number of capacity building and training activities completed on schedule
Achievement rate for resettlement activities in light of the agreed implementation plan
Resettlement fund allocated to resettlement agencies on time Receipt of scheduled funds by resettlement offices Disbursed funds according to the RAP Social preparation phase as per schedule Status of land acquisition and occupation during implementation
Resettlement and Relocation
Number of informal settler families (ISFs) provided with adequate project or resettlement information, consulted on relocation preferences and guided on procedures to avail of social housings
Participation rate of ISFs in selection and design of social housing locations and options
Number and percentage of ISFs provided with social housings Timeliness of the provision of social housings to relocating ISFs Quality of social housings provided to ISFs, for example,
suitability of locations, utilities, and access to social services Provided transitional assistance such as transportation
allowances Rental assistance provided until social housings are available for
eligible ISFs Percentage of relocating ISFs who are able to service financial
obligations and/or housing amortizations and payment Percentage of relocation ISFs who are satisfied with social
housings and stay in the same social housings Adequacy of the management of the selected key shelter
agencies such as the National Housing Authority (NHA) and the Social Housing Finance Corporation (SHFC)
Livelihood and Income Restoration
Number of PAPs under rehabilitation programs (data disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group)
Number of PAPs who receive skills training (data disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group)
Type of training and number of participants for each training Number and percentage of PAPs covered under livelihood
programs (data disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Number of PAPs who restore their income and livelihood patterns
(data disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Number of new jobs generated Extent of participation in rehabilitation programs
Monitoring Item Potential Indicator Extent of participation in vocational training programs Degree of satisfaction with support for livelihood programs Percentage of successful enterprises breaking even (data
disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Percentage of PAPs who improve their income (data
disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Percentage of PAPs who improve their standard of living (data
disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Number of PAPs with agricultural replacement land (data
disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Quantity of land owned or contracted by PAPs (data
disaggregated by gender and vulnerable group) Number of households with agricultural equipment Number of households with livestock
Benefit Monitoring Noticeable changes in patterns of occupations, production, and resource uses of PAPs in comparison with the pre-project situation
Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns of PAPs in comparison with the pre-project situation
Changes in the cost of living in comparison with the pre-project situation
Changes in key social and cultural parameters in terms of living standards
Changes occurred for vulnerable groups Benefits for PAPs from the Project
[Annex V-B] Environmental Monitoring Indicators
Monitoring Item Indicators General Project ECC conditions
Air Standard methods of the DENR as prescribed in its DAO No. 2000- 81, the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Philippine Clean Act of 1999 and the Presidential Decree No. 984 (National Pollution Control Decree of 1976), as amended by NPCC MC No. 1980-002 24 Hours Average:
Total Suspended Particulates (TSP), Particulate Matter less than 10 microns (PM10), (PM2.5), Lead (Pb), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),
1 Hour Average: Ozone (O3) and Carbon Monoxide (CO).
Noise Morning (5:00 AM to 9:00 AM), daytime (9:00 AM to 6:00 PM), evening (6:00 to 10:00 PM) and nighttime (10:00 PM to 5:00AM): Decibel (dBa) Provisions of the IFC Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines (2007)
Vibration Provisions of the British Standard 7385 (1993) since Philippines has no standards or procedures of investigation for the vibration study
24 Hours Water Surface Water DAO 2016-08 Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent
Standards of 2016
Primary Parameters
Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), color,
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended
solids (TSS), chloride as Cl, nitrate as nitrogen (NO3-N),
A. Out of the 21 parameters measured, 16 are covered by PNSDW and DAO 2016-08. These are color, temperature, pH, Fecal Coliform, Total Coliforms, TDS, Na, Cl, SO4, NO3-N, As, Cd, Cr +6, Pb, Hg, and CN.
Terrestrial Ecosystem
No. of Affected trees
Tree cutting permit(s)
Agreement reached with DENR PENRO/CENRO on National Greening Program (NGP) compliance
No. of replacement trees delivered to DENR PENRO/CENRO
No. of indigenous and threatened tree species balled and survived
No. and location of tree planting sites made available by DENR PENRO/CENRO
Archaeological, Cultural and Heritage
Number of affected sites affected by construction and action undertaken
Number, location and action taken on chance finds
Chance Find Procedure
Consultation and Grievances
Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, and community activities
Stakeholder awareness Utilization of the GRM by stakeholders Information on the status of grievance resolution Information on the implementation during the social preparation
phase Number and type of grievances Grievance Registry and Reporting
Communication and Participation
Number of general meetings organized for both men and women Percentage of women out of total participants Number of meetings exclusively with women Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups Number of meetings between host community residents Participation rate of women, men, and vulnerable groups for
meetings Level of communicated information – adequate or inadequate Disclosed information Translation of disclosed information in local languages
Note: General guidance only. External Monitoring Agent (EMA) shall validate the above monitoring indicators from the EIS during the proposal and inception report preparation.
Appendix D: Directory of Project Staff for the Implementation of the Environmental Compliance Requirements
PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
Appendix D Directory of Project EMP Implementation Staffing
S.N. Office
Affiliation Names Position Email Address Contact Details
1
Department of Transportation Railway Office
OUR Timothy John R. Batan Undersecretary for Railways [email protected]
OUR Fidel Igmedio T. Cruz, Jr. Assistant Secretary for Railways [email protected]
Appendix E: General Consideration for the SDP (N2)
PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY – CLARK EXTENSION PROJECT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR MALOLOS, BULACAN
Appendix F: Compliance Monitoring Reports (Submitted to EMB Central Office)
PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOTR)DOTr Head Office, Pinatubo Corber Osmena Street, Clark Freeport Zone, Angeles City,
Pampanga
MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: January - June 2019 (1st Semester 2019)
I. Basic Project Information
ECC Reference No. ECC-CO-1807-0017
Project Title North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Project Type Infrastructure Projects, Major Roads and Bridges, On-grade railway system (new project)
Location x, Malolos, Bulacan, R03
Project Stage/Phase Pre Construction
Contact Person Leonel Cray P. De Velez - Project Officer III
B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the Proponent as its commitment or if opted to be mutuallyagreed upon by Proponent with the EMB and other members of the MMT)
Evaluation of the Environmental Quality Status (EQS) is ongoing. Modifications in the EQS will be transmitted to EMB-CO for review and
approval.
C. Environmental Management Plan Status
The Proponent is updating the EMP appropriate to the changes made in the EIS.
D. Environmental Risk Categorization
The Project’s Environmental Monitoring and Audit Prioritization Scheme are attached in the next section.
E. Work Plan for Next Monitoring Period
The following will be conducted in the next monitoring period:
1. Coordination with EMB-CO and other agencies to relay any updates and modifications of the coverage and components of the Project.
1.1. Submission of the revised or modified EIS, EMP, and EMoP once finalized.
2. Provision of copies of the Project’s ECC, EMP, and EMoP to the General Consultant (GC) and to the civil works contractors after on boarding.
The General Consultant (GC) and the civil works contractors will be oriented to strictly comply with the relevant conditions of the ECC.
3. Submission of report detailing the updates on the set-up of GRM help desks, grievances received from project-affected persons and the
appropriate actions taken by the Proponent.
4. Formation of MMT.
4.1. Requesting of permanent and alternate MMT representatives from LGUs, NGOs and vulnerable groups to finalize members of MMT.
4.2. Drafting of the MOA and MOO, and establishment of the EMF.
5. Establishment of EGF as part of civil works contractor's scope
6. Integration of Detailed Engineering Design surveys to the EIS Report.
7. On-boarding of at least one (1) Pollution Control Officer as part of the Environmental Unit (EU).
8. Work on the finalization of the following documents as required by the ECC:
8.1. Waste Management Program
8.2. Certifications from DPWH Region III and Clark Development Corporation and Clark International Airport Corporation for the planned river
improvements.
8.3. Detailed plan for earth balling and replanting of mature native/endemic trees.
8.4. Greening Program
8.5. RAP
8.6. TIA
8.7. SDPs
9. Continue and improve current IEC Program.
10. Work on detailed environmental budget allocations.
V. Attachments
1. Sworn Accountability Statement (for the submitted CMR)
2. PEMAPS
3. PEMAPS Accountability Statement
4. Approved Environmental Monitoring Plan in the EIS
5. Approved Impact Mitigation Plan in the EIS
This document was generated on 8/1/2019 3:15:44 PM
B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the Proponent as its commitment or if opted to be mutuallyagreed upon by Proponent with the EMB and other members of the MMT)
Evaluation of the Environmental Quality Status (EQS) is ongoing. Modifications in the EQS will be transmitted to EMB-CO for review and
approval.
C. Environmental Management Plan Status
The Proponent is updating the EMP appropriate to the changes made in the EIS.
D. Environmental Risk Categorization
The Project’s Environmental Monitoring and Audit Prioritization Scheme are attached in the next section.
E. Work Plan for Next Monitoring Period
The following will be conducted in the next monitoring period:
1. Coordination with EMB-CO and other agencies to relay any updates and modifications of the coverage and components of the Project.
1.1. Submission of the revised or modified EIS, EMP, and EMoP once finalized.
2. Provision of copies of the Project’s ECC, EMP, and EMoP to the General Consultant (GC) and to the civil works contractors after on boarding.
The General Consultant (GC) and the civil works contractors will be oriented to strictly comply with the relevant conditions of the ECC.
3. Submission of report detailing the updates on the set-up of GRM help desks, grievances received from project-affected persons and the
appropriate actions taken by the Proponent.
4. Formation of MMT.
4.1. Requesting of permanent and alternate MMT representatives from LGUs, NGOs and vulnerable groups to finalize members of MMT.
4.2. Drafting of the MOA and MOO, and establishment of the EMF.
5. Establishment of EGF as part of civil works contractor's scope
6. Integration of Detailed Engineering Design surveys to the EIS Report.
7. On-boarding of at least one (1) Pollution Control Officer as part of the Environmental Unit (EU).
8. Work on the finalization of the following documents as required by the ECC:
8.1. Waste Management Program
8.2. Certifications from DPWH Region IV-A regarding river bridge pier design approval
8.3. Detailed plan for earth balling and replanting of mature native/endemic trees.
8.4. Greening Program
8.5. RAP
8.6. TIA
8.7. SDPs
9. Continue and improve current IEC Program.
10. Work on detailed environmental budget allocations.
V. Attachments
1. Sworn Accountability Statement (for the submitted CMR)
2. PEMAPS
3. PEMAPS Accountability Statement
4. Approved Impact Mitigation Plan in the EIS
5. Approved Environmental Monitoring Plan in the EIS
This document was generated on 8/1/2019 3:14:43 PM
Emergency Response Program The proponent will adopt an active
program of pursuing a healthy, safe, and
environment-friendly operation.
DOTr/Operator guidelines on health and
safety will be made clear to contractors
and all employees during construction
and operations. An orientation briefing for
contractors and training for employees
will be implemented.
Not Complied There are no revisions in the ERP which
was included in Section 5.6 of the EIS.
The ERP excerpt from the EIS can be
accessed here:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CxBh
D4vYTg1Y08t24X8N1SOrWKA2Xj7q
B. Impact Monitoring
I. Summary of Previous Monitoring
Findings/Issues Recommendations Action Plan
Previous submission was first CMR
Submission. Construction of Project has
not yet begun as of the submission of this
report.
N/A N/A
II. Current Monitoring and Findings
Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation
A. Ambient Water Quality Monitoring
B. Effluent Water Quality Monitoring
Overall Remarks on Water Quality Monitoring
N/A Construction of Project has not begun since contracts for civil works packages have not been awarded yet.
C. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
D. Effluent Air Quality Monitoring
Overall Remarks on Air Quality Monitoring
N/A Construction of Project has not begun since contracts for civil works packages have not been awarded yet.
E. Noise Level Monitoring
Overall Remarks on Noise Level Monitoring
N/A Construction of Project has not begun since contracts for civil works packages have not been awarded yet.
Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses
Expense Item
Budget Actual Expenses
Direct fromCo.
Budget forMMT
Direct Co.Expense
MMTExpense
A. Implementation of Management Plans &Programs
1. Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Social Development Plan - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. IEC Plan - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Enhancement Program (if any) - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B. Implementation of Monitoring Plans
1. Self-Monitoring - to be updated, part of General Consultant expenses 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Environmental Monitoring Fund (with MMT) - to be updated once
finalized/secured2000000.00 2000000.00 0.00 0.00
3. Environmental Guarantee Fund (Trust Fund) - to be updated, part of
Contractors' expenses5000000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Environmental Guarantee Fund (Cash Fund) - to be updated, part of
Contractors' expenses3000000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10000005.00 2000000.00 0.00 0.00
IV. Conclusions and Recommendations
A. Compliance Status
Construction has not begun for the project. The Proponent is currently working on complying with ECC conditions relevant to pre-construction.
Documents relevant to this submission can be accessed here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xxdTISCHoF8ZrlNjm0AZSs6RhrEZOuhL
B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the Proponent as its commitment or if opted to be mutuallyagreed upon by Proponent with the EMB and other members of the MMT)
EQPLs have been set in the EMoP in the EIS. Current version can be accessed here:
VII. Status of Compliance to Contingency/Emergency Response Plan or Equivalent Risk ManagementPlan.
Condition/Requirement DescriptionStatus of
ComplianceRemarks
Emergency Response Program The proponent will adopt an active
program of pursuing a healthy, safe, and
environment-friendly operation.
DOTr/Operator guidelines on health and
safety will be made clear to contractors
and all employees during construction
and operations. An orientation briefing for
contractors
and training for employees will be
implemented.
Not Complied The ERP excerpt from the EIS can be
accessed here:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VtWS
mncLSpKingdsMNxHc6-wO1Pzji3i
B. Impact Monitoring
I. Summary of Previous Monitoring
Findings/Issues Recommendations Action Plan
Previous submission was first CMR
Submission. Construction of Project has
not yet begun as of the submission of this
report.
N/A N/A
II. Current Monitoring and Findings
Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation
A. Ambient Water Quality Monitoring
B. Effluent Water Quality Monitoring
Overall Remarks on Water Quality Monitoring
N/A Construction of Project has not begun since contracts for civil works packages have not been awarded yet.
C. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
D. Effluent Air Quality Monitoring
Overall Remarks on Air Quality Monitoring
N/A Construction of Project has not begun since contracts for civil works packages have not been awarded yet.
E. Noise Level Monitoring
Overall Remarks on Noise Level Monitoring
N/A Construction of Project has not begun since contracts for civil works packages have not been awarded yet.
Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses
Expense Item
Budget Actual Expenses
Direct fromCo.
Budget forMMT
Direct Co.Expense
MMTExpense
A. Implementation of Management Plans &Programs
1. Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Social Development Plan - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. IEC Plan - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Enhancement Program (if any) - to be updated once finalized 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B. Implementation of Monitoring Plans
1. Self-Monitoring - to be updated, part of General Consultant expenses 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Environmental Monitoring Fund (with MMT) - to be updated once
finalized/secured2000000.00 2000000.00 0.00 0.00
3. Environmental Guarantee Fund (Trust Fund) - to be updated, part of
Contractors' expenses5000000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Environmental Guarantee Fund (Cash Fund) - to be updated, part of
Contractors' expenses3000000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10000005.00 2000000.00 0.00 0.00
IV. Conclusions and Recommendations
A. Compliance Status
Once the EISR has been finalized, the Proponent will provide the updated report to EMB-CO for review and evaluation. Updates include the
supplementary surveys recently conducted during the detailed design stage to establish more reliable monitoring stations for soil, flora and
fauna, water quality, ambient air quality, and noise and vibration.
Construction has not begun for the project. The Proponent is currently working on complying with ECC conditions relevant to pre-construction.
Documents relevant to this submission can be accessed here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gFMWp9-JX7PKN2V1VJxXtzyuf84Z-QLY
B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the Proponent as its commitment or if opted to be mutuallyagreed upon by Proponent with the EMB and other members of the MMT)
EQPLs have been set in the EMoP in the EIS. Current version can be accessed here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O413AwE1VQwZg9-
SD3y_W0uo9mMLanTc
C. Environmental Management Plan Status
The Proponent is updating the EMP appropriate to the changes made in the EIS. Current version can be accessed here:
PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank.
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
for the North-South Commuter Railway Clark
Extension Project
August 2019
Department of Transportation (DOTr)
Prepared by:
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. THE PROJECT 1
2. Objectives AND SCOPE 2
2.1. Objectives of the PROJECT Waste Management Plan 2
2.2. Scope 3
Exclusions 4
2.3. Approach and Methodology 4
Approach to waste minimization 4
Methodology 5
3. Regulatory Compliance 6
3.1. Relationship to Environmental Impact Assessment 6
3.2. National Laws and Regulations 6
Laws and Regulations Pertaining to Waste Management 6
DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016-08: Water Quality Guidelines and General
Effluent Standard and related standards 6
RA 9003: Ecological Solid Waste Management 8
LGU Solid Waste Management Plans 10
DAO 2019-17: Chemical Control Order for Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds 13
DAO 2014-02: Revised guidelines for Pollution Control Officer Accreditation 14
DAO 2013-24: Chemical Control Order for Lead and Lead Compounds 14
DAO 2013-22 Management of Toxic and Hazardous Waste and related standards 15
DAO 2000-02: Chemical Control Order (CCO) on Asbestos 16
DAO 2004-01: Chemical Control Order for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 16
3.3. Implications for Waste management plans 16
4. WASTE STREAMS 17
4.1. Introduction 17
4.2. PRE-CONSTRUCTION 17
Tree Clearance and disposal 17
Clearance of other Houses and building on the ROW or expanded ROW 18
Clearance of ISF Housing 18
Residual waste on the ROW 18
Hazardous Waste on the ROW 18
Summary of Pre-Construction Waste Streams and Process 19
4.3. Construction 20
Contracts 20
Grubbing Operation 20
Excavations Waste (Spoil) 21
Solid Waste 22
Liquid Waste 23
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page ii
Hazardous Waste 24
Electrical and Mechanical Installation (E&M) 24
Summary of Construction Phase Solid Waste Streams 24
4.4. Operation PHASE 25
Introduction 25
Solid Waste 26
Liquid Waste 26
Hazardous Waste 27
Summary 27
5. WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 28
5.1. Purpose 28
5.2. Institutional Arrangements 28
Pre-Construction 28
Construction 28
Operation 30
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Responsible LGU Parties per Construction Package 2
Table 2.2.1 Waste Management Responsibility by Project Phase 3
Table 3.2.1 Waterbody Classification and Usage of Freshwater 7
Table 3.2.2 Water Quality Guidelines for Primary Parameters 7
Source: JICA Design Team, 2019 *tentative package number
2. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
2.1. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
3. As part of the compliance to ECC conditions for the NSCR Clark Extension Project, DOTr is
required to “submit detailed waste management program (WMP) for proper handling, collection and
disposal of solid, hazardous and liquid wastes to EMB Central Office (CO) and EMB Region III within
six (6) months prior to project construction. Proof of implementation shall be submitted together with
the CMR.”1.
4. The Proponent has prepared this Project Waste Management Plan as a basis for the detailed
WMP to be developed by the Contractors as part of the Contractors Environmental Management and
Monitoring Plan (CEMMP).. Similar plans would be required for the site clearance activities (Pre-
Construction) and the railway operation (Operations).
5. The purpose of this Project Waste Management Plan (WMP) is thus to ensure that waste
generated in the pre-construction, construction and operational phases of the project is managed and
disposed of legally and in a way that protects both public health and the environment. The objective of
this Project WMP is to:
• Determine the types of waste that will be generated by the project;
• Estimate the volume of waste generated;
• Determine the capacity of LGUs and local waste streams for disposal;
• Identify alternative options for disposal if estimated volumes exceed local waste stream capability;
1 ECC Condition No.3, Annex A of the ECC issued to DOTr for the Malolos-Clark Railway Project (MCRP),
2018. CMR stands for “Compliance Monitoring Report”.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 3
• Outline the management controls that will be implemented to ensure waste is disposed of
according to this WMP and evidence to be submitted with the CMR;
• Outline required legal compliances; and
• Provide guidance on how to minimize, handle, control, re-use, recycle and dispose of all waste
generated all throughout project implementation.
2.2. SCOPE
6. This Project WMP is intended to form the foundation and strategy for the more detailed Waste
Management Plans to be developed by the responsible parties for the three separate phases of the project:
(1) Pre-construction; (2) Construction; and (3) Operation.
7. The pre-construction site clearance operation will be commissioned and managed by DOTr,
the proponent or their appointed agents the General Consultants. A site clearance contractor and tree
cutting contractor will be appointed. Both of them will be required to complete a WMP to specify the
ultimate disposal of the materials they remove from site.
8. Construction of the North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project will be divided
in six contracts. Each contractor will be required to produce a separate Site WMP that integrates the
requirements of this Project WMP with details of their own specific plans. All Contractors’ Site WMP
will be submitted to the Proponent’s Engineer (General Consultants) for approval as part of the
CEMMP.
9. The contractors have been given a number of choices in the contract documents that will affect
the details of their WMP such as whether or not to build a concrete batching plant or to sub-contract to
existing concrete suppliers. They are also given the choice of utilizing Contractor’s Yard Sites identified
by the design team or to identify their own. Furthermore, sites for spreading spoil have been suggested
in the bidding documents but the contractor is free to find his own disposal solutions. Notwithstanding
these uncertainties, the requirements of the Contractor WMP will remain the same.
10. The Operation of the railway will be put out to tender at a later date. The operation of the
railway includes operating trains, stations and the maintenance and stabling depot.
11. The main waste generating activities at each stage and the parties responsible for the WMP
are summarized in Table 2.2.1.
Table 2.2.1 Waste Management Responsibility by Project Phase
Project
Stage Responsibility Waste Generating Activities
Pre-construction
Proponent/General Consultant (GC)/Contractor
Clearance of trees
Clearance of surface constructions such as informal settler housing, waste material and dumped items.
Clearance of other buildings, houses and their associated structures (e.g. fences, water supply system components, drainage and sewage treatment facility components, etc.)
Construction Contractor per Contract Package
Site Preparation
Clearance of top surface (150mm) of site (Grubbing)
Fencing of site
Support Sites
Construction and operation of concrete batching plant1
Construction and operation of casting yard(s)
Construction and operation of worker dormitory, offices, canteens
Operation of medical center.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 4
Project
Stage Responsibility Waste Generating Activities
Supporting Infrastructure
Installation of drainage (entire length)
Installation of concrete road (entire length)
Railway Construction
Deep piling excavation, excavation of pile cap,
Construction of reinforced concrete piles, pile cap and piers.
Construction of Stations and associated works
Constructing of Bridges and associated works
Embankment Works at transitions
Cut and Cover tunnel Works
Depot Construction
Excavation of unsuitable material at depot
Land raising and installation of retaining walls at depot
Piling of building foundation piles
Construction of Depot Buildings
E&M Works
Installation of railway infrastructure (Track and Electrical)
Operation Proponent / Operator Station and station retail and food service operations
Train passenger operations (on board waste)
Track maintenance
Rolling stock maintenance at depot
Employee/ Commercial Waste from offices/ canteen etc. 1The contractor may not build a batching plant and opt to subcontract concrete production Source: JICA Design Team, 2019
Exclusions
12. Waste generators not included in the scope of the Project WMP are electricity infrastructure
changes (new connections by power supply companies) which will be covered under existing
obligations of the electricity suppliers.
2.3. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
Approach to waste minimization
Waste management on the project will be guided by the widely accepted waste hierarchy illustrated
below in Figure 2.3.1.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 5
Source: National Solid Waste Management Commission
13. The inverted triangle represents the relative volumes of waste at each stage with the aim being
to avoid most waste by design and only have to dispose of a small amount. A brief summary of the
meaning of each stage of the hierarchy is as follows:
• Avoidance: Where possible the contractor will choose processes and maintain work procedures
that avoid the generation of waste.
• Reduction: The contractor will reduce the generation of unnecessary waste by considering in its
planning and purchasing decisions the final disposal of waste generated.
• Reuse: The contractor will always consider reusing materials before disposal.
• Recycling: The contractor will ensure the separation of waste materials in order to maximize
recycling.
• Treatment: The contractor will reduce the need for treatment by avoiding toxic products or will
segregate and ensure specialist treatment to recover material if possible. The contractor will treat
wastes such as liquid wastes before discharge to the environment.
• Disposal: The final and least desirable option is disposal into a sanitary landfill site for burial.
Methodology
14. Relevant national laws were reviewed and summarized. The responsibilities under the laws of
the Philippines have been outlined.
15. Analysis of the stages and activities of the project has been made and a list of predicted wastes
has been determined. For major waste streams a prediction of the volume of waste generation has been
made in consultation with the JICA Design Team.
16. The 10-year Solid Waste Management Plans (SWMP) in each of the 10 municipalities/cities
through which the rail alignment passes, were reviewed and the LGU’s consulted as to the waste processing services available locally. Specialized waste processors for toxic and hazardous waste that
serve the provinces of Bulacan, Pampanga and Tarlac were identified from DENR-EMB accredited lists.
Avoidance
Reduction (minimization)
Reuse
Recycling
Treatment
Disposal
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 6
3. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
3.1. RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
17. The project received approval of the submitted Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on
13th August 2018 and the project was issued with an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC). As
stated in Section 2.1 above, this Project WMP is to fulfill Condition 3 of the ECC.
3.2. NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Laws and Regulations Pertaining to Waste Management
18. The applicable laws, rules and regulations affecting waste management in the Project as a
whole, and particularly disposal, consist of the following:
• Republic Act (RA) 9275 or the Clean Water Act, and its Implementing Rules and Regulations,
DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016-08;
• Republic Act (RA) 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 and its
Implementing Rules and Regulations, DAO 2001-34;
• Republic Act 6969 or the Toxic Substances, Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act of 1990
and its Implementing Rules and Regulations, DAO 2013-22, DAO 2000-02, EMB Memorandum
Circular (MC) 2017-0003 and EMB MC 2017-004
• DAO 2019-17: Chemical Control Order for Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds
• DAO 2014-02: Revised guidelines for Pollution Control Officer Accreditation
• DAO 2013-24: Chemical Control Order for Lead and Lead Compounds
• DAO 2004-01: Chemical Control Order (CCO) for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
• DAO 2000-02: Chemical Control Order (CCO) on Asbestos
• DAO 1997-39: Chemical Control Order for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds
• DAO 1997-38: Chemical Control Order for Mercury and Mercury Compounds
• MC 2008-008 - Effluent Quality Monitoring Manual
DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016-08: Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent Standard and related standards
19. One of the objectives of DAO 2016-08 is to control the quality of waste water that is
discharged to a watercourse. The allowable levels of pollutants depend on the classification of the
receiving waterway. DENR has classified waterways into five classes, with AA being the highest quality
and D the lowest. Table 3.2.1 reproduces Table 1 of the DAO 2016-08 and explains the five quality
levels. As noted in this table EMB should be consulted for water body classification and will determine
the beneficial use for previously unclassified rivers2.
20. Discharges form any point source shall at all times meet the general effluent standards in Table
3 ‘Water Quality Guidelines for Primary Parameters’ in DAO 2016-08 reproduced in Table 3.2.2
below. In addition, Table 8 ‘Significant Effluent Quality Parameters per sector’ in DAO 2016-08 lists
the industry specific parameters [organized by Philippine Standard Industrial Code (PSIC)] that must
be monitored. Extracts from Table 8 of the DAO are reproduced below in Table 3.2.3. In cases where
the discharging activity does not fall into one of the identified sectors the EMB should be consulted for
a decision.
2 Current classifications are found at http://water.emb.gov.ph/?page_id=757
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 7
21. A discharge to a watercourse requires a permit. The Permitting process is outlined in DAO-
2004-25. In practice the discharger is required to monitor the significant pollutants produced in the
discharge and these form the basis of the monitoring plan. The contractor should seek approval of EMB
for any exemptions.
22. An Effluent Quality Monitoring Plan must be produced in accordance with the EMB
Memorandum Circular 2008-008 (Effluent Quality Monitoring Manual). Self-Monitoring Plan
requirements are outlined in DAO 2003-27. After agreeing the monitoring plan with EMB and being
awarded the permit, the Contractor must record his inspection sampling and submit a self-monitoring
report to EMB every quarter.
Table 3.2.1 Waterbody Classification and Usage of Freshwater
Class Intended Beneficial Use
AA Public Water Supply Class I – Intended primarily for waters having watersheds, which are uninhabited and/or otherwise declared as protected areas, and which require only approved disinfection to meet the latest PNSDW
A Public Water Supply Class II – Intended as sources of water supply requiring conventional treatment (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection) to meet the latest PNSDW
B Recreational Water Class I – Intended for primary contact recreation (bathing, swimming, etc.)
C
1. Fishery Water for the propagation and growth of fish and other aquatic resources
2. Recreational Water Class II – For boating, fishing or similar activities
3. For agriculture, irrigation and livestock watering
D Navigable waters
Source: Table 1 of DAO 2016-08
Table 3.2.2 Water Quality Guidelines for Primary Parameters
Source: Table 3 of DAO 2016-08 (contains important additional notes)
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 8
Table 3.2.3 Significant Effluent Quality Parameters Edited to relevant rows
PSIC
Code
Industry
Category Project Application
Significant
Parameters Parameter Limits
23940 Manufacture of Cement
Cement Concrete Batching Plant
Temperature,
pH,
Total Suspended Solids
Tables 3-6 in DAO 2017-08
55
Other accommodation services
Housing, Temporary Facilities
Contractor’s Yard
BOD,
fecal Coliform,
Ammonia,
Nitrates,
Phosphates,
Oil and Grease,
Surfactants
Tables 3-6 in DAO 2017-08
OC3
Effluent from Oil and Water Separator of auxiliary facilities
Depot
pH,
Total Suspended Solids,
Oil and Grease
Tables 3-6 in DAO 2017-08
37000
Sewage (operation of sewer systems or sewage treatment facilities that collect treat or dispose of sewage)
Station Operation
BOD,
fecal Coliform,
Ammonia,
Nitrates,
Phosphates,
Oil and Grease,
Surfactant
Tables 3-6 in DAO 2017-08
Source: Table 8 of DAO 2016-08
RA 9003: Ecological Solid Waste Management
23. RA 9003 created the institutional mechanisms and incentives for the implementation of an
ecological solid waste management program at the LGU level. The implementing rules are contained in
DAO No. 2001-34.
24. Under the Act, DENR is responsible for setting up and heading the National Solid Waste
Management Commission (SWMC) and serves as the coordinating body to develop and implement the
National Solid Waste Management Framework.
25. The local government unit (LGU) is responsible for setting up a Solid Waste Management
Board (SWMB) and is required by the Act to formulate a 10-year local Ecological Solid Waste
Management Plans instituting an effective and sustainable solid waste management plan with primary
emphasis on implementation of all feasible re-use, recycling and composting programs. Residual and
special waste is required to go to a sanitary landfill site.
26. In practice, many LGU’s have struggled to fully implement the Act and Engineered landfills have only been built in a few areas. Most LGU have a Material Recycling Facility (MRF) at the
Barangay level where mixed waste is sorted into waste streams.
27. Based on RA 9003, solid wastes are classified into four (4) waste streams:
• Compostable;
• Recyclable;
• Residual/non-recyclable; and
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 9
• Special wastes.
Special wastes include bulky wastes (items too large to be disposed in normal channels), hazardous
wastes, including waste electrical, electronic equipment (WEEE). Examples are shown in Figure 3.2.1.
Source: IRR of RA 9003
Figure 3.2.1 Classification of Solid Wastes based on RA 9003
28. The IRR for RA 9003 and RA 6969 will be the basis for classifying and separating wastes that
will be generated from the project.
29. Sanitary landfill sites are categorized into four types dependent on the capacity amongst other
technical specifications as shown in Table 3.2.4..
Table 3.2.4 Category of Landfill Types
Category Capacity
Tons per day
Features and
Features Over Lower Category
Category 1 ≤ 15 Leachate Collection
Category 2 >15 ≤ 75 Leachate Collection
+ Leachate Treatment
Category 3 >75 ≤ 200 Leachate Collection
+ Leachate Treatment
+ Compact clay system or HDPE liner
Category 4 >200
Leachate Collection
+ Leachate Treatment
+ Composite liner
Source: Technical Guidebook on Solid Wastes Disposal Design, Operation and Management (NSWMC/JICA 2010) The National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) is the major agency tasked to implement Republic Act 9003.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 10
LGU Solid Waste Management Plans
30. Each of the cities and municipalities along the railway alignment has submitted a 10-Year
SWMP to the National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC). The purpose of the plan is
to detail how the LGU will collect and dispose of waste.
31. LGU SWMP vary somewhat from one locality to another, however most barangays or
groupings of barangays have implemented a MRF that sorts domestic and commercial waste into the
compostable, recyclable and residual wastes. Recyclable items such as cardboard and plastics and
reusable items are sometime sent through the junk shop system. The junk shop system shred or batch
materials and prepare for resale into the raw material market or repair or reuse items for resale. Few if
any barangays have an effective composting system so compostable waste may end up in landfill.
32. Domestic and Commercial (office and business) waste collection is carried out by private
waste operators or by the LGU in-house operation. These waste transporters arrange waste separation
and recycling and transport residual waste to the nearest sanitary landfill, which may be in neighboring
provinces.
33. As a result of the implementation of RA 9003 MRFs are established for each Barangay or
cluster of Barangays. The intended purpose of the MRF is to receive mixed waste for final sorting,
segregation, composting, and recycling.
34. Residual wastes in Region 3 are usually disposed at the Metro Clark Waste Management Corp.
Sanitary Landfill, located in Capas, Tarlac. The Clark Landfill also has a Treatment, Storage and
Disposal (TSD) Facilities for Toxic and Hazardous Waste (THW) but various other companies treat or
recycle hazardous and toxic wastes.
35. The older municipal open dump sites may still exist, but these are either closed or being closed
and rehabilitated. Under the RA 9003, disposing waste in these types of landfills is prohibited.
36.
37. Table 3.2.5 below outlines the waste stream facilities available or used by LGU to meet the
requirements of the Solid Waste Management Plan and Figure 3.2.2 shows the location of major MRF,
Sanitary Landfill sites and closed Open Dump Sites (ODS).
38. The Contractor will need to engage private or LGU waste contractor for collection and disposal
of the onsite domestic and commercial waste streams and an up-to-date list of accredited private waste
operators are available from the city or municipality Environment and Natural Resources Offices
(ENRO).
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 11
Table 3.2.5 LGU 10-Year Waste Management Plans
LGU
Approved
Waste Mgt
Plan1
Composting
Facility
Food waste
use
Material
Recovery
Facility
(Recycling)
Other
Recycling
e. g. Junk
Shops
Residual
Waste
Landfill
Special
Wastes
Typical
Tipping Fee
Malolos, Bulacan
No No data
Yes, plastics , metals and glass separated at an MRF;
1 municipal-wide,
3 barangay-wide
Multiple junk shops offer reuse options
Taken to Cat. 4 Landfill in Capas, Tarlac
(Metro Clark Waste Management Corp.);
or used as alternative fuel in Holcim waste-to-energy facility
Taken to Metro Clark Waste Management Corp. Sanitary Landfill
Taken to EMB Accredited TSD Facility
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 12
LGU
Approved
Waste Mgt
Plan1
Composting
Facility
Food waste
use
Material
Recovery
Facility
(Recycling)
Other
Recycling
e. g. Junk
Shops
Residual
Waste
Landfill
Special
Wastes
Typical
Tipping Fee
Angeles, Pampanga
Yes No data Operational, city-level
Multiple junk shops offer reuse options
Taken to Metro Clark Waste Management Corp. Sanitary Landfill
Taken to EMB Accredited TSD Facility
Mabalacat, Pampanga
Yes No data Yes
(Completed and operational)
Multiple junk shops offer reuse options
Taken to Metro Clark Waste Management Corp. Sanitary Landfill
Taken to EMB Accredited TSD Facility
Bamban, Tarlac
No No data Operational, barangay-level (Dapdap)
Multiple junk shops offer reuse options
Taken to Metro Clark Waste Management Corp. Sanitary Landfill
Taken to EMB Accredited TSD Facility
Capas, Tarlac
No No data Non-operational, municipal-level
Multiple junk shops offer reuse options
Taken to Metro Clark Waste Management Corp. Sanitary Landfill
Taken to EMB Accredited TSD Facility
1Data is taken from list of approved 10-Year Solid Waste Management Plan as of May 15, 2019 http://nswmc.emb.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/17152.pdf
Source: EMB Region 3 http://r3.emb.gov.ph/solidwaste-management
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 13
Figure 3.2.2 Map of Major MRF, Sanitary Landfills and Closed Open Dumpsites in
Region 3 Source: EMB Region 3 http://r3.emb.gov.ph/solidwaste-management
DAO 2019-17: Chemical Control Order for Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds
39. RA 6969 is an act to control toxic substances and hazardous and nuclear wastes, providing
penalties for violations thereof, and for other purposes.
40. DAO 2019-017 provides consolidated rules and regulations for Arsenic and Arsenic
compounds, and its wastes.
41. This Order aims to do the following:
a. Reduce the risk of exposure to human health and the environment of arsenic and arsenic
compounds used in the industrial processes;
b. Increase awareness about the toxicity of arsenic and its compounds, as well as the
availability of technically superior and safer alternatives;
c. Develop the framework for proper implementation of appropriate prevention-based
programs to mitigate, reduce and eliminate risks from the use of arsenic and arsenic
compounds; and
d. Provide guidelines to identify potential arsenic release/exposure in industrial facilities to
reduce workers’ arsenic exposure.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 14
DAO 2014-02: Revised guidelines for Pollution Control Officer Accreditation
42. DAO 2014-02 requires the contractor to nominate a Pollution Control Officer (PCO) who has
received the EMB 40-hour PCO training to manage and monitor hazardous waste on site. The duties
and responsibilities of the PCO are as follows:
1. Ensure compliance with the requirements of PD 1586, RA 6969, RA 8749, RA 9003, RA 9275,
their respective implementing rules and regulations (IRRs), and other pertinent rules and
regulations;
2. Identify significant environmental aspects and impacts of the company’s operational activities and recommend possible mitigating measures for the formulation and preparation and/or review of the
Environmental Management Plan and Contingency Plan;
3. Attend to all permitting and registration requirements of the establishment and in the construction,
installation and operations of pollution sources and control facilities;
4. Ensure the proper performance, operation, and maintenance of environmental management facilities
or systems of the establishment such as the following:
a. Wastewater treatment facilities;
b. Air pollution control devices referred to in DAO 2000-03;
c. Hazardous waste management storage areas (permanent or temporary);
d. Solid waste segregation management facilities; and
e. Environmental monitoring devices and other environmental monitoring devices.
5. Ensures that the hazardous wastes disposed offsite are covered by a Permit to Transport; each
Transport is covered by a hazardous waste manifest duly signed by the transporter and TSD facility;
and with corresponding Certificate of Treatment. Copies of the signed hazardous waste manifest
and COT shall be submitted to EMB Region 3 in accordance with DAO 2004-36;
6. Monitor compliance to the requirements specified in the Environmental Compliance Certificate and
the commitments stipulated in the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans or
Environmental Performance Report and Management Plans and report the same in the CMR;
7. Monitor activities pertaining to the installation or construction of pollution source and control
facilities to ensure compliance with the National Emission Standards for Source Specific Air
Pollutants and National Ambient Air Quality Standards and report monitoring results to DENR as
part of the Self-Monitoring Report (SMR);
8. Monitor activities pertaining to the operation and maintenance of pollution control facilities to
ensure compliance with the Standards and report monitoring results to DENR as part of the SMR;
9. Monitor the use of chemicals, especially those listed under the Priority Chemical List (PCL) and
those with Chemical Control Orders (CCO) and the generation of solid and hazardous wastes;
10. Monitor the importation or distribution of chemicals;
11. Promptly submit CMRs and SMRs.
DAO 2013-24: Chemical Control Order for Lead and Lead Compounds
43. RA 6969 is an act to control toxic substances and hazardous and nuclear wastes, providing
penalties for violations thereof, and for other purposes.
44. DAO 2013-24 pertinent
45. This Order aims to do the following:
a. Increase awareness about toxicity of lead and lead compunds an;
b. Increase awareness about the toxicity of arsenic and its compounds, as well as the
availability of technically superior and safer alternatives;
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 15
c. Develop the framework for proper implementation of appropriate prevention-based
programs to mitigate, reduce and eliminate risks from the use of arsenic and arsenic
compounds; and
d. Provide guidelines to identify potential arsenic release/exposure in industrial facilities to
reduce workers’ arsenic exposure. 46.
DAO 2013-22 Management of Toxic and Hazardous Waste and related standards
47. RA 6969 is an act to control toxic substances and hazardous and nuclear wastes, providing
penalties for violations thereof, and for other purposes.
48. DAO 2013-22 Revised Procedures and Standards for the management of Hazardous Wastes,
contains the revised procedures and standards for the implementation of RA 6969. It contains the
updated classification of THW, and outlines the requirements for Waste Generators and Waste
Transporters.
49. The following are some key points taken from the advice:
• The waste generator is determined to be large, medium or small depending on the amount of THW
produced. The waste generator must meet the requirements set out in Table 3.2 of DAO 2013-22.
• All hazardous wastes are classified by codes and must be identified before entering the waste stream
as set out in Table 2.1 of DAO 2013-22.
• THW transporters are registered and licensed to carry certain waste only.
• THW must be disposed of at a registered THW landfill sites or treater and a hazardous waste
manifest system must be used to identify waste transported.
• A trained Pollution Control Officer (PCO) should have responsibility for THW.
• THW should not be mixed and should be segregated and managed according to compatibility.
• Building demolition waste is not classified as THW unless it contains asbestos.
• The following are also not classified as THW: Septic tank effluents, spoils from quarrying and
excavation, wastewaters disposed on site through the sewage system as set out in Table 2.2 of DAO
2013-22.
• All hazardous waste containers or drums should be labelled (for storage purposes) as per DAO 2013-
22 requirements, using the template shown in Figure 3.2.3. Figure 3.2.3 Hazardous Waste Label
Figure 3.2.3 Hazardous Waste Label
Source: DAO 2013-22
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 16
50. The latest list of DENR-EMB accredited HW transporters and TSD facilities, as of December
31, 2018, is found in APPENDIX A, while the list of accredited residual waste transporters and sanitary
landfills in Region 3 is found in APPENDIX B.
DAO 2000-02: Chemical Control Order (CCO) on Asbestos
51. DAO 2000-02 is meant to control and regulate the use and disposal of asbestos into the
environment to avoid the adverse health consequences of exposure to asbestos.
52. Asbestos is most likely to be found in building materials where it has been used in mostly in
building materials (roofing shingles, ceiling and floor tiles, paper products, and asbestos cement
products).
53. DAO 2000-02 Section 9 (6) sets out the requirements for the removal of asbestos during
demolition. If asbestos is present it will be necessary to have removal carried out by companies licensed
by DENR and following the requirement in the Control Order.
DAO 2004-01: Chemical Control Order for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
54. The DAO 2004-01 gives implementation provisions of Republic Act No. 6969
55. The need to follow PCBs disposal requirements may result from discovery of illegal or
improper dumping of waste that contained PCBs, such as transformer fluids or leaks (fugitive emissions)
from electrical transformers and capacitors containing PCBs that are removed as part of the project.
3.2.9 MC 2008-008 - Effluent Quality Monitoring Manual
56. The MC 2008-008 provides water quality monitoring manual in order to establish the uniform
quality control assurance on a nation-wide ambient water and effluent quality monitoring
3.3. IMPLICATIONS FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS
57. During the three phases of the project (Site Clearance, Construction and Operation) the
proponent and contractors/ operator must in particular:
• Make a check for asbestos or any other material subject to Chemical Control orders and make
separate plans for extraction and disposal using licensed companies;
• Empty any septic tanks in areas for demolitions and dispose of liquids to licensed waste water
treatment works;
• Ensure that the Solid Waste disposal operators are accredited by DENR and the LGU in which
they operate and separate ‘special wastes’ from the other types and if necessary separate the other
types into compostable, recyclable and residual (landfill) waste before collection;
• Ensure that Hazardous and Toxic Waste generated by construction and operations is separated and
stored appropriately and according to the regulations;
• Ensure that before transport of Hazardous and Toxic Waste to licensed waste facilities the waste is
labeled according to the manifest system and is only transported by licensed hazardous waste
transporters;
• Before any discharge to the local water drainage system, waste water is treated to meet appropriate
standards for the effluent and class of watercourse; and
• Monitor waste water discharges and submit monitoring reports to EMB quarterly.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 17
4. WASTE STREAMS 4.1. INTRODUCTION
58. In this section the various types of waste the project will produce are identified and waste
volumes are predicted. If waste disposal volumes may overwhelm local disposal this is noted.
4.2. PRE-CONSTRUCTION
Tree Clearance and disposal
59. All trees within the project ROW will be removed. Trees will be cleared after obtaining the
Tree Cutting Permit from the DENR. The proponent will employ a contractor to cut down the trees and
dispose of them.
60. The tree survey has been completed in preparation for the application for tree cutting permit.
Tree inventory and re-survey3 results are shown in Table 4.2.1. Under the requirements of the Philippine
Regulations (DAO-16-2018) trees on Public lands over 15cm Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) should
be delivered to DENR for use in timber projects. In practice, the marketable trees will need to be
auctioned off to the timber trade and may end up in furniture, wood crafts, charcoal or as fuel. DENR
should be consulted as to procedures to dispose of the trees. The number of trees has the potential to
overwhelm DENR’s disposal process.
61. Trees less than 15cm DBH will require disposal either through the cutting contractor or by a
specification by the proponent. Allowing the contractor to dispose for profit should reduce the bid price
for the work. It is likely that a proportion of the wood will find a market for fuel or charcoal. Wood and
brash that the contractor cannot use may be chipped or transported for composting or industrial fuel. As
the chippings or brash cannot be left on site the contractor will have to transport elsewhere.
3 Re-survey was due to the adjustment and modification of the alignment and the disparity between the
Computer-Aided-Design (CAD) and the kmz/kml files that has been observed and to determine the number of
additional affected trees within the project ROW.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 18
62. The proponent will coordinate with the DENR Region 3 Office on turning over of timber and
update the Waste Management Plan at the pre-construction stage.
63. After discussion with contractors about feasibility the tree clearance specifications will ensure
the waste wood and brash is chipped and disposed to composting or other reuse rather than land fill.
Clearance of other Houses and building on the ROW or expanded ROW
64. Houses built on the PNR ROW and houses and building outside the PNR that are purchased
under eminent domain in order to expand the ROW will be demolished. The exact number of houses
and buildings and their size has not been confirmed yet.
65. Some of the buildings are expected to contain septic tanks. These will be emptied before tanks
are removed and the pits filled in.
Clearance of ISF Housing
66. ISFs will be given the opportunity to retrieve construction materials from their own property,
but it is envisaged that the site will need to be cleared of a lot of outstanding materials. A clearance
contractor will be employed to demolish and remove any structures remaining on site and various other
dumped materials. To ensure the clearance contractor disposes of the rubble in the correct way the
proposed final disposal site will be submitted to the proponent for approval and the waste receipts
audited.
67. An estimate was made based on the structures recorded by the Resettlement Action Plan
(RAP) team. In total of approximately 2,400 structures were found on the project section. A typical
structure is a 4 m x 4 m x 2m high built with 2/3 with 8mm plywood timber and 1/3 with 100mm
concrete blocks on a concrete base 4 m x 4 m x 100mm. This amounts to 0.96m3 concrete blocks and
1.6m3 concrete base and 0.172m3 timber per structure. On top of this we assumed 16m2 of canvas
sheeting per structures. It is assumed the timber and sheeting will be recovered by owners leaving 2,304
m3 of concrete blocks and 3,840 m3 of concrete bases to be removed.
Residual waste on the ROW
68. It is expected that some general refuse will be left on site by ISFs in properties but also
informal waste dumps. This will also be cleared by the clearance contractor and disposed of at the nearest
landfill site.
69. If each dwelling left one 40L bag of domestic waste there will be 239m3 (2400 dwellings x
0.04m3) of domestic waste to dispose of. There may also be general refuse and surface dumping areas.
To ensure the clearance contractor disposes of the refuse in the correct way the final disposal site will
be submitted to the Engineer for approval and the waste receipts audited.
Hazardous Waste on the ROW
70. Initial inspection by RAP team suggests that there is little asbestos on site. Asbestos is most
likely to be in the form of previously salvaged asbestos concrete sheeting if present. However, in order
to deal with the risk of asbestos being present in some ISF dwellings. DOTr should arrange to carry out
an initial inspection by a qualified person. If asbestos is found a contractor registered for asbestos
clearance will be employed to remove the material safely and dispose at a licensed THW landfill
according to the requirements of DAO 2000-02.
71. There may be some other residual hazardous waste such as batteries, bulbs, oil, chemicals on
site. This will not be known until the site is assessed. To ensure this is properly disposed of the clearance
contractor will be asked make a hazardous material inspection in advance of general demolition to
separate hazardous material and dispose separately.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 19
72. The contract with the clearance contractor will have suitable contingency for asbestos
discovery and disposal in advance of any other demolition work. To ensure the clearance contractor
disposes of the hazardous waste in the correct way the final disposal site will be submitted to the
Engineer for approval and the waste receipts audited.
Summary of Pre-Construction Waste Streams and Process
73. The size of the project and the number of ISFs who are living on the Project ROW means that
there is substantial amount of waste to remove from the project ROW before construction can
commence.
74. At least two specialist contractors will be required. The tree cutting contractor and the
demolition and clearance contractor. It may also be necessary to use a specialist asbestos removal
contractor if asbestos is found.
75. A waste management plan will be prepared by the proponent or contractor for the pre-
construction phase and submitted to EMB for approval. This can only be completed once the contractor
is appointed and final details of the disposal methods are clear.
76. The proper disposal of the waste will be ensured by implementing the following specification
into the clearance contractor’s work requirements.
• Tree Cutting:
Agreeing a procedure and delivery schedule for the delivery of marketable timber to DENR
Region 3 Yard or other disposal option.
Determining a plan for the disposal of small wood / brash material with the contractor and
identifying the disposal route.
• ISF Dwelling and other Building Demolition:
Incorporate a specification for inspection and removal of asbestos if found before general
demolition and auditing the disposal manifest system.
Survey for and incorporate a specification for the emptying of septic tanks both formal
(purchased properties) and informal settler’s latrines. Determine the contractor’s proposed waste stream (landfill, re-use, crush etc) and waste manifest
system that can be implemented.
Attempt to recycle concrete, concrete blocks and other suitable building materials by crushing
to recycled aggregate.
77. Table 4.2.2 summarizes the pre-construction waste streams.
Table 4.2.2 Summary of Pre-Construction Waste Streams
Waste Stream/s Classification
or form Disposal Option/s Estimated Amount Monitoring Options
Trees <15cm dbh and brash
Chipped or cut Disposal sites as approved by the DENR.
~6,660 trees DENR/PENRO/CENRO acknowledges the total
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 20
Waste Stream/s Classification
or form Disposal Option/s Estimated Amount Monitoring Options
Trees >15cm dbh Cut to timber units
Sold to the timber market, timber yards may be identified by Proponent and approved by DENR, or be identified by DENR;
All logs and other derivable materials recovered from the cut trees shall be turned-over to the depository area of the DENR PENRO/CENRO having jurisdiction of the area for custody and proper disposition (e.g., award to Department of Education for school chairs and tables, etc.).
~5,898 trees
volume of cut trees received and ensures its proper disposal. Proponents’ monitoring will be limited when cut trees have been turned over.
Demolition rubble
Generally non-toxic: concrete bases and blocks
Landfill, land raising 2,304m3 Contractor reports via tipping receipts or other evidence.
Domestic Refuse left on site
Various forms, mostly plastic or paper
Landfill site approx. 239m3 Tipping receipts
Liquid Septic Tank waste
Sewage Sewage Treatment Works
Not known Transfer receipts
Hazardous Materials General
Chemicals, paints, oils etc.
DENR licensed hazardous landfill site.
General Landfill if part of construction rubble
Not known Fully audited by THW manifest
Hazardous Materials CCO
Asbestos (if found)
DENR licensed hazardous landfill site
Not Known Fully audited by THW manifest system
Source: JICA Design Team (estimates)
4.3. CONSTRUCTION
Contracts
78. Seven contractors are expected to build the railway, wherein four will work on construction,
one on the depot, one on Electric and Mechanical (E&M) and one on the Rolling Stock. Rolling Stock
is not expected to generate any particular waste issues.
Grubbing Operation
79. The contractor is required to carry out the grubbing of the remaining roots and the removal of
the top 150mm of soil in preparation for construction. This soil is likely to be mixed with various bits
of rubble, tree roots and plants. This type of soil may not all be suitable for land raising for building
projects but may have use on land fill sites for cell creation, covering or filling quarried areas.
80. Across the whole route Malolos to CIA (51.9km x 30m x 0.15m plus additional amounts for
60m width stations) amounts to 241,500m3 of spoil. Table 4.3.1Table 4.3.1 shows the predicted
grubbing spoil volume itemized per contract package.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 21
81. The volumes calculated represent about 67 10-cu.m trucks per day if the work is carried out
in 3 months as planned.
Table 4.3.1 Spoil Volume Grubbing Operation
Contract
Package
Clearing and
Grubbing
Area (Ha)
Volume Spoil at
150mm depth (m3)
CP N-01 40 60,000
CP N-02 36 54,000
CP N-03 31 46,500
CP N-04 18 27,000
CP N-05 36 54,000
TOTAL 241,500
Source: JICA Design Team
82. The spoil will enter the market for spoil spreading in the local areas. This market for spoil
spreading will only become clear close to the time of the operation. Several areas have already been
identified as suitable for spoil spreading by the JICA Design Team. Since this has been confirmed with
land owners the capacity required is assured, however but the chosen contractors will make their own
choice based on the cost and benefits of what is available in the market at the time.
Excavations Waste (Spoil)
83. Construction of each pier involves the excavation of multiple piles and pile caps at each pier
location at a usual spacing of 40m along the ROW. Further excavations are required for drainage, roads
and the additional piles required at stations and for all the buildings at the depot.
84. From geological investigations it is known that this spoil is either silts or sands. This type of
soil will be suitable for land raising for building projects and may have value as aggregates.
85. The total amount of spoil that will be removed for the project has been calculated by the design
team as 1,705,545m3. Table 4.3.2Table 4.3.2 shows the predicted amounts of spoil produced.
Table 4.3.2 Spoil Excavation Construction Build
Contract
Package
Viaduct Pile and
Pile Cap
Buildings &
Stations
Drainage &
Roads
Volume of Spoil
removed (m3)
CP N-01 221,615 24,542 116,873 363,030
CP N-02 178.463 16,887 98,681 294,031
CP N-03 154,767 23,939 96.943 275,649
CP N-04 69,736 260,683 56,572 386,991
CP N-05 (depot) 362,155 23,689 385,844
Total 1,705,545
Source: JICA Design Team
86. As above, the spoil will enter the market for spoil spreading in the local areas. This market for
spoil spreading will only become clear close to the time of the operation. Several areas have already
been identified as suitable for spoil spreading by the JICA Design Team. Since this has been confirmed
with land owners the capacity required is assured, however but the chosen contractors will make their
own choice based on the cost and benefits of what is available in the market at the time. Spoil may also
have a use in backfilling borrow pits used to raise levels at the depot or other quarry sites.
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 22
Solid Waste
87. Solid wastes generated by the contractor during the course of work will be;
• Domestic/ Commercial Waste: Waste from Accommodation blocks, offices
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 23
and re-use possibilities and boosting the local economy. A list of ‘Junk’ Shops (Recycling Service Providers) is given can be obtained from the Federation of Junk Shop Owners in the Philippines
93. The contractor will detail the arrangements made in the WMP in order for the plan to be
audited.
94. During concrete pours and in the pre-fabrication yard there may be waste concrete. A number
of options are possible for this surplus concrete:
• Return waste to batching plant, for reuse in lower quality concrete or other use or crushed for
aggregate;
• Use on site for hard standing areas, additional roads;
• Pour and recycle as aggregate when set, then crushed on or off site; or
• Pour and send to land fill when set.
95. The Contractor will outline in its WMP the options it will use for disposing of waste concrete.
96. Most casting formwork is expected to special purpose metal forms as this is the most economic
method. Timber formwork may be needed on occasion and timber may be used in many temporary
constructions, scaffolding work etc. Timber in formwork has a limited life and is disposed of after 2-3
uses. Timber can be usefully reused and recycled or used as fuel and may find a use via the local junk
shop system. The contractor is expected to separate timber from other waste and attempt to find non-
landfill uses.
Liquid Waste
97. The main liquid wastes generated during construction and operation will be:
• Sewage: From portable toilets and septic tanks;
• Grey water: From washing cleaning water used in offices and accommodation;
• Pile slurry liquid: Drilling Slurry is made up of polymers or special clays depending on
technology used by contractor; and
• Concrete washout liquids: From cleaning of concrete batch plant and transporter trucks and other
equipment.
98. Sewage removal in portable chemical toilets will be sub-contracted to portable toilet suppliers
and disposed through their existing sewage companies. If the contractor elects to use toilets running
water flush systems these will either be connected to septic tanks and emptied by a similar waste disposal
company that pumps out the tank and takes to a sewage treatment plant or treated on site in a portable
Waste Water Treatment Plant (WTP). To ensure the waste is disposed of correctly the companies
concerned will be required to provide evidence of correct disposal. If using an WTP a discharge permit
will be required from EMB and a monitoring plan developed.
99. All septic tanks shall be designed with three (3) chamber type to ensure that there is no risk to
groundwater from overflow between emptying schedules
100. Grey water from office and accommodation washing facilities will also be directed to tanks or
to WTP. In the case of the tanks, the water will be extracted and taken to a municipal treatment works.
If the case of an ABT the final discharge will be suitable for discharge to the local waterways/ drainage.
If using an WTP a discharge permit will be required from EMB and a monitoring plan developed.
101. Piling is carried out with a liquid slurry system. The slurry is either mixed with bentonite clay
or special polymers to stabilize the sides of the borehole. Before the slurry is disposed of the material
must be de-watered. The water from this process may require further treatment before disposal to the
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 24
sewer or local watercourses due to pH or contaminants. The contractor may test and neutralize the water
before discharge.
102. A method of disposal of pile slurry liquid will be proposed by the contractor in their WMP.
This will normally involve a settling area to separate the liquid from the spoil, treatment of liquid before
discharge to local drainage systems. All leaching area, evaporation ponds etc. will be designed to contain
the waste material fully for later extraction and disposal.
103. Concrete delivery trucks, pumping pipes and casting machines require regular wash outs to
prevent waste concrete hardening in place. Washout water is usually high in pH (Alkaline). DAO-2016-
08 requires discharge water to be less than 8.5-9.0 pH (depending on watercourse class) The treatment
and disposal of wastewater from washing out of concrete lorries and batching plants will be proposed
by the contractor in their WMP and will likely involve a settling area with evaporation ponds before
disposal of the remaining cement cake to a landfill site or acid neutralization of the liquid waste.
104. Any water discharged to the local drainage system has to meet the requirements of DAO 2016-
08, a discharge permit with an agreed monitoring plan is required from EMB and monitoring results
must be submitted quarterly. Additional sampling and auditing will be carried out by the Engineer as
required.
Hazardous Waste
105. Some hazardous waste is expected to be produced during the construction phase mainly
hazardous chemical containers, lightbulbs, batteries etc. The contractor must segregate the materials and
arrange disposal at a Hazardous Waste Disposal Site.
106. To ensure the Hazardous Waste is disposed of according to the laws and regulation outlined
in Section 3.2.5 above the contractor shall implement a waste separation process on site and a hazardous
waste manifest system as explain below in Section 5.
Electrical and Mechanical Installation (E&M)
107. The installation of tracks, signaling and overhead catenary is not expected to generate
significant amounts of waste. Metal wastes and some electrical wastes are expected.
Summary of Construction Phase Solid Waste Streams
108. Table 4.3.4Table 4.3.4 summarizes the waste streams for construction and proposes the
monitoring requirements. The various contractors will be required to produce waste management plans
for approval by the Engineer as specificed in project specifications.
Table 4.3.4 Summary of Construction Waste Streams
Operation Type of Waste Description Disposal Monitoring
Grubbing Soil and Mixed
Generally non-toxic: consist mainly of soil, occasional concrete and rocks, weeds and shrubs
• Sanitary Land Fill
• Backfill for quarry sites Waste Receipts
Piling and Pile Cap
Spoil Silts and Sands
• Land raising
• Backfill for quarry sites
• Aggregates
Reporting and Audit
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 25
Operation Type of Waste Description Disposal Monitoring
Office and Accommodation
Domestic and commercial type solid waste
Consist mainly of recyclables, compostables and residual wastes
• Through local Waste operator
• Separated at MRF
• Residuals to Residual Landfill
Audit of contract
Waste Concrete Solid Solid Concrete
• Reuse on site
• Crush for aggregates
• Land Fill
Contractor to specify
Timber Solid Occasional Formwork • Fuel
Contractor to specify
Review of WMP
Process Audit
Office and Accommodation
Liquid Sewage and Grey Water
• Tank storage and disposal by contractor at treatment works
Review of WMP
Process Audit
Medical Hazardous Infectious Wastes
Pharmaceuticals and Drugs
• Temporary storage and disposal by contractor
Review of WMP
Process Audit
Waste Manifest receipts
Pile Slurry Liquid
Potential contaminated liquid depending on technique used
• Neutralization and disposal to surface water
Contractor to specify
Review of WMP
Process Audit
Washout Liquid High pH • Neutralization and
disposal to surface water
Contractor to specify
Review of WMP
Process Audit
General Operations
Hazardous/ Special Waste
Batteries, fluorescent lamps, chemical containers
• Segregation and disposal at hazardous waste site
Review of WMP
Process Audit
Waste Manifest receipts
E&M Installation Solid waste Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment
• Segregation and disposal
Review of WMP
Process Audit
E&M Installation Special Waste Chemicals • Segregation and
disposal at hazardous waste site
Review of WMP
Process Audit
4.4. OPERATION PHASE
Introduction
109. There are seven stations on the line from Malolos to CIA. Some stations have been designed
with space for shops and food service outlets on the ground and first floors. Solid waste streams within
the station have been designed for passenger operation only at the design stage and further waste plans
will need to be made once the operation plan for the stations is further developed. Stations contain public
and staff toilets and staff kitchens.
110. The rolling stock maintenance details are not known at this stage as the contract will be design
and build. However, estimates have been made based on Japanese Operators Guidelines6.
111. Operations maintenance takes place at the depot where there is a maintenance Workshop
Waste Management Plan North-South Commuter Railway Clark Extension Project
Page 26
Operational Control Center (OCC). There is also a Training Institute with capacity for approximately
208 people. Overall up to 603 people may be on site in a day. All the Depot buildings will contain toilets,
washrooms and there will be a canteen and kitchen.
112. Track maintenance is another operation that will lead to waste being produced as fixings,
sleepers and ballast are maintained. Track maintenance splits into two types slab and ballast although
the greatest part of the track is slab.
113. The Contract and Specifications for operations has not been completed. As part of the
Operators Contract the Proponent will require a Waste Management Plan as part of the Environmental
Management Plan (EMP).
Solid Waste
114. Solid waste generation at the station and has been estimated based on the number of
passengers. Provision has been made for three bin recycling waste bins in the Station design and these
will allow all the waste to be picked up by the local commercial waste management company
115. Train preparation works involves light maintenance and trash collection and will take place at
the depot. This has been estimated based on half full trash boxes of 7kg each and 370 cars per day
(1,295kg). Light maintenance involves general housekeeping tasks like air conditioning, lights,
emptying waste bins and cleaning etc. and this has been estimated as 20kg per day using Japanese
Operation experience.
116. Scheduled maintenance takes place at the Workshop where train parts are disassembled and
serviced. Waste from these operations includes many oils and other materials that are contaminated with
oils, greases or hazardous waste and worn out parts. The wheel grinding operation produces steel waste
that has a ready market for recycling.
117. The offices, control center and training institute will generate commercial/ domestic type
waste. It is assumed this is one third of the figure stated in Senate Document AG-17-01 “Philippine Solid Waste at a glance”7 of 0.9kg per person per day in 2025 or 0.3kg.
118. It is expected that the Operator will enter into a contract for Solid Waste Removal with local
Solid Waste transport operators.
Liquid Waste
119. Liquid waste water and sewage at the stations will be treated by a Water Treatment System
installed at each station. This will be discharged to the local drainage system as no reliable local sewage
system is available. The water discharged to the local drainage system will meet the requirements of
DAO 2016-08 and monitoring will be agreed with EMB.
120. There are no toilets on the trains.
121. The Mabalacat depot is located near an existing sewage treatment works and thus all waste
water can be connected to the municipal sewage system for treatment. Estimates were made for sanitary
waste water based on The Philippines Institute of Development Studies paper “Determination of Basic Household Water Requirements”8. This paper identified 60.5 liters per capita per day.