Page 1
Western Washington UniversityWestern CEDAR
Huxley College Graduate and UndergraduatePublications Huxley College of the Environment
Fall 2016
Environmental impact assessment Fever Creekbridge replacementAnalissa MerrillWestern Washington University
Gus LandefeldWestern Washington University
Kyle EastonWestern Washington University
Shiloh BrittWestern Washington University
Novella RandallWestern Washington University
Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/huxley_stupubs
Part of the Environmental Studies Commons
This Environmental Impact Assessment is brought to you for free and open access by the Huxley College of the Environment at Western CEDAR. Ithas been accepted for inclusion in Huxley College Graduate and Undergraduate Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. Formore information, please contact [email protected] .
Recommended CitationMerrill, Analissa; Landefeld, Gus; Easton, Kyle; Britt, Shiloh; and Randall, Novella, "Environmental impact assessment Fever Creekbridge replacement" (2016). Huxley College Graduate and Undergraduate Publications. 65.https://cedar.wwu.edu/huxley_stupubs/65
Page 2
EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentFeverCreekBridgeReplacement
ENVS 493, Fall 2016
WesternWashingtonUniversity
Authors:
AnalissaMerrillGusLandefeldKyleEastonShilohBritt
NovellaRandall
Page 4
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
2
FeverCreekPedestrianBridgeReplacementEIAProjectTeamEnvironmentalImpactAssessment-ENVS493HuxleyCollegeoftheEnvironmentWesternWashingtonUniversityBellingham,WA,98225October2016DearConcernedCitizen, TheCityofBellinghamisattainingpermitstocompletetheFeverCreekbridgereplacement.Previously,thispedestrianbridgeconnectedSuperiorandMichiganstreets,whereEIllinoisStreet“T’s”intoMichigan,byprovidingasafeandeasypathwaytocrossFeverCreekforresidentsofAlabamaHillandRooseveltneighborhoods.ThiswasanimportantrouteforschoolchildrengettingtoRooseveltElementary.Duetopoorconditionstheoldbridgewasdeconstructedandthetrailclosed.Thecommunitywillbenefitfromreplacingthebridge.However,theprojectmayinvolvenegativeimpactsontheFeverCreekecosystemandsurroundingwetlands.
ThefollowingdocumentincludesanEnvironmentalImpactAssessment(EIA)developedinaccordancewiththeStateEnvironmentalPolicyAct(SEPA,WAC-197-11)toassesstheimpactsassociatedwithreplacingthepedestrianbridgeoverFeverCreek.
TheEIAanalysiswilldeterminethesignificanceoftheprojectontheenvironment.Areviewofrelevantliteratureandresearchwillbeconductedtolookatcurrentconditionsandproposedimpactsontheenvironment’searth,air,water,floraandflauna,aswellastransportationconditionsandimpacts.Theproposedaction,possiblealternativeoptions,andmitigationstepswillbereviewedtoevaluateandmitigateimpacts.Thisinformationwillbecompiledintoadecisionmatrixtomakeaneducateddecisiononif,when,andhowthisprojectshouldbecompleted.
Sincerely,AnalissaMerrill,GusLandefeld,KyleEaston,ShilohBritt,andNovellaRandall
Page 5
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
3
WesternWashingtonUniversity
HuxleyCollegeUndergraduateHuxleyCollegeoftheEnvironmentPublications
ProposedFeverCreekBridgeReplacementEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentEnvironmentalImpactAssessment,ENVS493,Spring2016Analissa Merrill WesternWashingtonUniversityGus Landefeld WesternWashingtonUniversityKyleEastonWesternWashingtonUniversityShilohBrittWesternWashingtonUniversityNovellaRandallWesternWashingtonUniversity
Disclaimer:ThisreportrepresentsaclassprojectthatwascarriedoutbystudentsofWesternWashingtonUniversity,HuxleyCollegeoftheEnvironment.Ithasnotbeenundertakenattherequestofanypersonsrepresentinglocalgovernmentsorprivateindividuals,nordoesitnecessarilyrepresenttheopinionorpositionofindividualsfromgovernmentortheprivatesector.
Page 6
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
4
FactSheetProjectTitle:EnvironmentalImpactAssessment:FeverCreekBridgeReplacementProposedAction:TheCityofBellingham(COB)proposedactionattheFeverCreektrailcrossingsitebetweenSuperiorStreetandMichiganStreetistoreplacetheexistingwoodenbridgewithanew,updatedbridgeinaccordancewithCOBstandardsforallrecreationalfootpathbridges.Thisactionisproposedduetohighdeteriorationoftheexistingwoodenbridge.LegalDescription:TheFeverCreekbridgeandtrailarelocatedbetweenMichiganandSuperiorStreets,whereEIllinois“T’s”intoMichiganStreet,inBellingham,Washington.LeadAgency:CityofBellingham210LottieStreetBellingham,WA98225Proponents:GinaAustin,P.E.,M.ASCEBellinghamPark&Recreation3424MeridianStreetBellingham,WA98225(360)[email protected] :CityPermits–Clearing;Grading;CriticalAreas;PublicWorksStormwater;SEPADeterminationStatePermits–HydraulicProjectApprovalFederalPermits–Nationwidepermit;WaterQualityApprovalPreparedbyandAuthorContributions:ShilohBritt–Scribe,Tables&Figures,Acronyms,EarthSoils,GlossaryKyleEaston–Factsheet,Background,AirQuality,WaterQualityresearchGusLandefeld–ExecutiveSummary,FloraandFauna,GeographicInformationSystemsAnalissaMerrill–Background,WaterQuality,AirQualityresearch,ConclusionNovellaRandall–CitizensLetter,Transportation,Formatting,andPrimaryEditorDistributionList:Dr.TamaraLaninga,AssistantProfessorDepartmentofEnvironmentalStudiesHuxleyCollegeoftheEnvironment
Page 7
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
5
WesternWashingtonUniversityBellingham,WA98225HuxleyMapLibraryArntzenHall,Room101WesternWashingtonUniversityBellingham,WA98225WilsonLibraryWesternWashingtonUniversityBellingham,WA98225Acknowledgement:Specialthankstothefollowingpeoplefortheiradditionalassistance:Dr.TamaraLaninga,WWU,WashingtonGinaAustin,COB/BellinghamParks&RecreationIssueDate:TuesdayDecember6,2016PublicPresentation:Date–ThursdayDecember8,2016beginningat2:30pmLocation–CityHallCouncilChambers,210LottieStreet,Bellingham,WA98225
Page 8
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
6
TableofContents
CitizensLetter……………………………………………………………………..…………………..………………………….2FactSheet……………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….4TableofContents………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………..…6ListofTablesFiguresandAcronyms……………………………………………………………………………….….91.0 ExecutiveSummary………………………………………………………………………………………….…….11
1.1 Purpose……………………………………………………………………………….……………….……..111.2 SiteDescription…………………………………………………………………………………………..111.3 ProposedActionandAlternatives………………………………………………….……………111.4 NeedforAction…………………………………………………………………………………….…….121.5 ProposedAction………………………………………………………………………………….………121.6 AlternativeAction……………………………………………………………………………….………121.7 NoAction………………………………………………………………………………………….………..121.8ImpactMatrix…………………………………………………………………………………………….…….131.9Recommendation……………………………………………………………………………………………..13
2.0 Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………....142.1 FeverCreek………………………………………………………………………………………………...142.2 LegalContext……………………………………………………………………………………………..142.3 ProposedActionPermits…………………………………………………………………………..…15
3.0 EnvironmentalElements………………………………………………………………………………..……….173.1 Earth……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………….17
3.1.1 ExistingEnvironment…………………………………………………………………….…173.1.2 ProposedAction……………………………………………………………………….…....19
Impacts…………………………………………………………………………..…………….…19Mitigations……………………………………………………………………..………………20
3.1.3 AlternativeAction……………………………………………….…………………………..20Impacts…………………………………………………………………………………….………21Mitigation……………………………………………………………..……………..…………..21
3.1.4 NoAction……………………………………………..………………………..………………..21Impacts……………………………………………………………..………..……………………21
3.2 Water………………………………………………………………………………………………….………213.2.1 ExistingConditions…………………………………………………………………….…….213.2.2 ProposedAction………………………………………………………………….…………..22
Impacts…………………………………………………………………………………….………22Mitigation…………………………………………………………………………………………22
3.2.3 AlternativeAction………………………………………………………………….………..23Impacts…………………………………………………………………………………….………23
Page 9
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
7
Mitigation…………………………………………………………………………………………233.2.4 Noaction………………………………………………………………….……………………..23
Impacts……………………………………………….……………………………………………233.3 Air……………………………………………………………………………………….………………………23
3.3.1 ExistingConditions…………………………………………………….…………………….233.3.2 ProposedAction……………………………………………….……………………………..26
Impacts…………………………………………………………………….………………………26Mitigation……………………………………………………….……………………………….27
3.3.3 AlternativeAction……………………………………….…………………………………..28Impacts…………………………………………………………………….………………………28Mitigation……………………………………………………………….……………………….28
3.3.4 NoAction………………………………………………….……………………………………..28Impacts……………………………………………………………….……………………………28
3.4 Flora&Fauna……………………………………………………………………………..……………….293.4.1 ExistingEnvironment…………………………………………………….…………………293.4.2 ProposedAction…………………………………………………….………………………..29
Impacts……………………………………………………………………….……………………29Mitigations………………………………………………………………….……………………29
3.4.3 AlternativeAction………………………………………….………………………………..30Impacts……………………………………………………………………….……………………30Mitigation…………………………………………………………………….………………….30
3.4.4 NoAction……………………………………………………….………………………………..30Impact……………………………………………………………………………………………..30
4.0 BuiltEnvironmentElement4.1 Transportation…………………………………………………………………..…………………………30
4.1.1 ProposedAction…………………………………………………..……………………………31Impacts……………………………………………………………..……………………………..31Mitigations………………………………………………….…………………………………..31
4.1.2 AlternativeAction………………………………………….…………………………………31Impacts………………………………………………………..…………………………………..31Mitigations……………………………………………….……………………………………..32
4.1.3 NoAction…………………………………………….…………………………………………..32Impacts……………………………………………..……………………………………………..32
5.0 ImpactMatrix………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6.0ConclusionandRecommendation……………………………………….……………………………………….327.0Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..338.0References……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….34
Page 10
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
8
ListofTables,FiguresandAcronyms
TablesTable1.DecisionMatrixTable2.DecisionMatrixKeyTable3.EngineemissionlevelsforvariouscompoundsTable4.EngineemissionlevelsforvariouscompoundsTable5.DecisionMatrixTable6.DecisionMatrixKey
FiguresFigure1.GISNetworkAnalysisMapFigure2:FeverCreekShortPlatFigure3:SatelliteimageofFeverCreekShortPlatFigure4:TestPitLocationMapoftheFeverCreekBridgeFigure5:MapoflocationofWetlandAandBlocatedonandneartheworksiteFigure6:FeverCreekPedestrianCountsAcronymsAQI:AirQualityIndexCO:CarbonMonoxideCOB:CityofBellinghamCSBC:CrushedSurfacingBaseCourseFAC:FacultativeWetlandIndicatorRatingFACU:FacultativeUplandWetlandIndicatorRatingFACW:FacultativeWetlandIndicatorRatingft,ft2:Feet,SquarefeetIPCC:IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChangeL.E.G:LicensedEngineeringGeologistNAAQS:NationalAmbientAirQualityStandardsNOx:variousNitrogenOxidecompoundsNRCS:NaturalResourcesConservationServiceNWCAA:NorthwestCleanAirAgencyO3:OzonePAH:PolyaromatichydrocarbonsPb:LeadP.E:licensedcivilengineerwithgeotechnicalexperienceppm:partspermillionPM:ParticulateMatterPsf:PoundpersquarefootROW:RightofWaySEPA:StateEnvironmentalPolicyAct
Page 11
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
9
SO2:SulfurOxideWAC:WashingtonAdministrativeCodeWSDOT:WashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationWWU:WesternWashingtonUniversity
Page 12
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
10
1.0ExecutiveSummary1.1PurposeThepurposeofreplacingtheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeistoprovideasafe,reliable,andenvironmentallyresponsiblebridgerunningeasttowestbetweenSuperiorStreetandMichiganStreet.CurrentlythereisnopedestrianbridgeconnectingthetrailthatcomesfromtheEIllinoisStreetRightofWay(ROW)andcrossesFeverCreek.Theformerbridgewasremovedprimarilyduetopublicsafetyconcerns,asitsawheavyusebyelementaryschoolchildrenwhowouldwalkfromtheirhomesintheRooseveltandAlabamaHillneighborhoods.Thisdocumentwillexaminetheimpactsofreconstructingthebridgeandconsidertwodifferentalternatives.
Figure1:AnetworkanalysisforpedestriandetoursduringtheclosureoftheFeverCreekpedestrianbridge.ThenetworkanalysiswasperformedinArcGISandintendedtoprovideabasisforpedestriandetours.Tobenotedisthattherearenosidewalkspresentonthedetourroutes.(CreatedbyGusLandefeld2016).
1.2SiteDescriptionTheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgerunseasttowestalongtheEIllinoisStreetROWbetweenSuperiorStreetandMichiganStreet.FeverCreekitselfisanarrowcreekrunningnorthtosouthandfeedingintoWhatcomCreekasatributary.Currentlythereisnopedestrianbridgein
Page 13
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
11
place,forcingformeruserstowalkonstreetswithoutthesafetyofsidewalksortoillegallycrossthecreek,whichdamagesthefragileecosystem.
1.3ProposedActionandAlternativesThefollowinglistofactionsincludesaproposedaction,analternativeaction,andanoactionalternative.ThesearetheoptionspresentedtotheCityofBellinghaminregardstowhatshouldbedonewiththeFeverCreekpedestrianbridge.
1.3.1NeedforActionReconstructionoftheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeisnecessarybecauseitprovidesasafeandreliablewayforitsprimaryusergroupofRooseveltElementarySchoolstudentstowalktoandfromschool.Ifthebridgeisnotreplaced,thenelementaryschoolstudentsdonothavetheoptionofwalkingtoschoolonapaththatisfreefrommotorizedvehiclesandthereforelesssafethanthepedestrianbridge.
1.3.2ProposedActionTheproposedactionforthereplacementoftheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeistoinstallatemporarybridgethatabidesbythestandardsoftheCityofBellinghamassoonaspossiblepriortowinter.Thentoreplacethetemporarybridgewithapermanentbridgeatthebeginningofthesummer.BecausestudentsattendingRooseveltElementarySchoolareoneofthelargestusergroupsofthebridge,constructionofapermanentbridgewouldoccurafterJune15,2017whenstudentsareoutofschoolanduseofthebridgedrops.TheCOBwouldneedtoensurethatthewetlandintheareasurroundingthebridgeisproperlyrestoredandthebridgeisconstructedwithenvironmentalmitigationinmind.
1.3.3AlternativeActionAnalternativeactionistoforegoinstallingatemporarybridgeforthewintermonthsandinstallapermanentbridgeimmediatelytoreopenthetrail.Theoverallobjectiveofthealternativeactionwouldbethesameastheproposedactionwiththeonlydifferencebeinginthetimeofyearofconstructionandanincreaseinenvironmentalmitigationefforts.
1.3.4NoActionThenoactionalternativeistoleavetheFeverCreekbridgesiteunaltered.
1.4SummaryofSignificantImpactsFeverCreekflowssouthandfeedsintoWhatcomCreekandeventuallyintoBellinghamBay.BothFeverCreekandWhatcomCreekaredesignatedassalmonbearingstreamsand
Page 14
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
12
constructionofanewpedestrianbridgenearRooseveltElementarySchoolhasthepotentialtodetrimentallyimpactthecreek.Thiscouldcomeintheformofpollutionfromconstructionvehicles,debrisbeingcaughtinthecreek,anddestructionofpotentialsalmonhabitats.
Theprimarypotentialenvironmentalimpactswouldbepositivebecauseofnecessarywetlandrestorationefforts.Littledamageofthesitewouldoccurduetotherelativelysmallsizeoftheproject.Mostoftheconstructionperformedwouldrequirelittletonovehicleassistedwork,thereforereducingtheamountofcarbondioxideandothernoxiousfumesemitted.Theproposedactionwouldonlyrequireafewenvironmentalmitigationeffortstokeepenvironmentalimpactsatminimumlevels.
1.5ImpactMatrixTable1showsthedecisionmatrix,whichoutlinesthesignificantimpactstoenvironmentalelementsanalyzedfortheproposed,alternative,andnoactionalternatives.
Table1:DecisionMatrix
SEPAElements ProposedAction AlternativeAction NoAction
Earth -2 -1 -1
Water +1 -2 -1
Air -1 -1 0
Flora&Fauna +2 +1 -2
Transportation -1 +1 -2
Total -1 -2 -6
Table2:DecisionMatrixKey
1.6RecommendationsWerecommendthattheproposedactionispursuedasitwouldreduceenvironmentalimpactswhencomparedtothealternativeandnoactionplans.ReplacingtheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgewouldhelpprovideasafepathforelementaryschoolstudentstocommuteonfoottoandfromschooleachdaybyminimizingtimespentawayfrommotorizedtraffic.
Score Impact
+1to+2 PositiveImpact(2beingsignificant)
-1to-2NegativeImpact
(2beingsignificant)
0 ZeroImpact
Page 15
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
13
2.0 Background2.1FeverCreekThepurposeofreplacingtheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeistoprovideasafe,reliable,andenvironmentallyresponsiblebridgerunningeasttowestbetweenSuperiorStreetandMichiganStreet.ThebridgeconnectstheRooseveltneighborhoodwithRooseveltElementarySchool.Thepreviousbridgewasdeemedunsafeduetoageandstructuraldamage.Theonlystructureremainingarethesupportstructuresonthecreekbank.CurrentlythereisnopedestrianbridgeconnectingthetrailthatcomesfromtheEIllinoisStreetRightofWayandcrossesFeverCreek.FeverCreek’sheadwatersbegininFeverCreekNatureAreaandflowthroughRooseveltNatureAreaandprivateresidencesbeforereachingtheworksite.Duetotheproposedworksite’scloselocationtoprivateproperties,atributarytoWhatcomCreek,andtwolargewetlandsinthearea,environmentalimpactsneedaddressing.Theimpactsthisdocumentconsidersincludeearth,water,air,floraandfauna,andtransportation.Seasonaldifferencesbetweentheproposedandalternativeactionsinregardstoconstructionofthebridgeisunderconsideration.Theproposedactionputsconstructionofthebridgeinsummerwhenflowratesinthecreekwillbelow.Thealternativeactionputsconstructionofthebridgeinwinterwhenflowratesarehigher.Pedestrians,particularlyschoolchildren,continuetotakethisroutetoschool,causingerosionproblemsandcreatingafurtherneedforatimelysolution.
2.2LegalContextThebridgelocationatFeverCreekandtheaccompanyingtraildonothaveastandardlegaldescription.Thereisnomeetsandboundsdescriptionofthepropertyandalthoughthearea
Figure2:FeverCreekShortPlat,lyingtotheNorthoftheEIllinoisROW(CourtesyofChicagoTitleCompany)
Page 16
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
14
mayunofficiallybedesignatedasaneasementbelongingtotheCOB,thereisnorecordofthisinrelationtotheneighboringshortplats.In1889,EastIllinoisStreetwasdedicatedtothepublic.ThetrailisdescribedasthatunopenedportionofEastIllinoisStreetlyingbetweenMichiganStreetandSuperiorStreet.
Figure3:SatelliteimageofFeverCreekShortPlatshowingproposedactionlocation(CourtesyofChicagoTitleCompany)
2.3ProposedActionPermitsThisprojectwillrequire5permitsfromtheCOB,thisincludes:agradingpermit,aclearingpermit,acriticalareaspermit,oneforpublicworksstormwater,andaSEPAdetermination.Thegradingandclearingpermitsarenecessaryforanyworkthatisdoneregardingthemovementofsoil(specificallyexcavationandsoilfill)andvegetationclearingrespectivelyforworkinandaroundtheproposedactionsite.Thecriticalareaspermitisdesignedtoprotectsensitiveenvironmentalareasandrestorethemasneededasbestaspossibletotheiroriginalstateafteranyprojectasbeencompleted.Almostanyprojectthatinvolvesthemovementofsoilwillalsorequireastormwaterpermit,alongwithanyadditionalworkthatdealswithimpervioussurfaces.Finally,thisprojectwillrequireaSEPAdeterminationforreasonsthatwillbedescribedwithinthisreport.
Inadditiontocitypermits,thisprojectwillalsorequireoneWashingtonstatepermit.Thehydraulicprojectapprovalpermit,issuedbytheDepartmentofFishandWildlife,isrequiredfor
Page 17
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
15
anyprojectthatoperationsnearanystatewaters.Thisrequirementisspecificallydesignedforprotectionofaquaticwildlife.
Finally,thisprojectwillrequiretwofederallevelpermits:thenationwidepermit,andawaterqualityapprovalpermit.ThenationwidepermitisenforcedbytheUnitedStatesArmyCorpsofEngineers,andbothpermitsdealwithsitewaterqualityunderthe1992CleanWaterAct.
3.0 EnvironmentalConditions
3.1Earth
3.1.1ExistingConditionsOnSeptember15,2015,aWhatcomCountySoilSurveywasconductedattheproposedFeverCreekbridgereplacementsite.ThesurveyrevealedthatonesoiltypeexistednearorwithintheproposedsiteparcelandwasclassifiedatWhatcomSiltyLoamconsistingof3to8percentslopes(ElementSolutionsetal.,2016).
Furthermore,theElementalSolutionssoilsurveyindicatedthathydricsoilsarefoundthroughouttheparametersofthestudysiteandarethoughttobeassociatedwiththedepressionalfeaturesofthesite.ThetexturesofthesoilwerenotdiscoveredtobeconsistentwiththatoftheonlineNaturalResourceConservationService(NRCS)date,andthesoilsinstead,whichweregenerallydisturbed,couldbepotentiallyclassifiedasacombinationsoiltype:WhatcomSiltyLoamandWhatcomSandyLoam.
ElementalSolutionsobservessoilstohavehydricindicators.Multipletimesofsoilswerefoundatthesiteincludingsandyloam,siltyloam,andotherloamysoils.Furthermore,WashingtonStateDepartmentofNaturalResourcesdesignatedthesoilsasglaciomarinedrift.(ElementSolutionsetal.,2016).InformationonexistingsurfacegeologicconditionswascompiledbytheWashingtonState
Figure4TestPitLocationMapoftheFeverCreekBridgeRH2EngineeringIncAugust23,2016.COBFigure4:TestpitlocationmapoftheFeverCreekBridge(RH2Engineering,Inc.2016;COB)
Page 18
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
16
DepartmentofNaturalResources(WADNR). Thecurrentexistingpathleadingtotheformerbridgeconsistsof4to6inchesindepthofcrushedlimestonebase.Nativesandyclay,whichhasbeenidentifiedasglaciomarinedriftandincludesvariableorganicsthatreduceincontinuationasdepthincreases,werealsofound.(Burwell,D.,2016)
Thetestpits,detailedintheGeotechnicalreport,indicatedthatthesiteisunderlainbyglaciomarinedriftofvaryingdensities(softtoverystiff),withatendencytobemedium-stifftoverystiffintheareasuplandfromsurfaceto10feetto1footbelowgroundsurface.Theglaciomarinedrift,itself,consistsofvaryingamountsofsand,gravel,silt,andtheoccasionalboulderclusterorstandaloneboulder.Observedvariationoftheglaciomarinestiffnesscanbeattributedtothedryingprocessofthesurface.GroundwaterelevationsandsoilsaturationlevelswillvarywiththeseasonandprecipitationeventsinadditiontotheproximitytotheFeverCreekstreamandadjacentwetlands(Burwell,D.,2016).
Intheentiretyoftheproposedproject,excavationtothesubgradewillbemandatoryandrequiretheremovalofexistingnativeearthandfillcomposites.Thiswilllikelyentailtheuseofheavyearth-movingmachinery.(Burwell,D.,2016)Whenexcavatingearthfortheretainingwallandbridgefoundation,theexcavationmustoccurdeepenoughtoensurethattheexistingnativesubgradeisconsistentincompositionofin-situsoilsthataresuitable.Thein-situsoilsmusthaveacompositionthatwillnotallowforbearingonthesoftlayersorlocationsthatlackshearstrength.(Burwell,D.,2016)
Topsoilzonesincludebioturbated,whichisazoneofweatheredand/ororganictopsoil.Thiszonehasdepthsvaryingfrom1.5to3.0feet,whichisdependentuponadjacenttreelocationsandpreviousconstructionactivity.Thistopsoilmaybelaterusedforlandscapingpurposes.
Earthmaterialorfillexposedatthebaseofexcavationthatisdeemedunsuitablebythegeotechnicalstandards(seegeotechnicalreport)istobeover-excavatedandreplacedwithcrushedsurfacingbasecourse(CSBC)pertheWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation(WSDOT)2016Specifications(Burwell,D.,2016).
Asinrelationtosoils,footingsforretainingwallsandstructuresaretobeplaceddirectlyona6-inchsurfaceofunyieldingandfirmCSBC.Additionally,thechosenareamustbefreeofallloosematerial.SubgradebelowtheCSBC,ifnative,shouldbecomprisedofstiffglaciomarinedriftandfreeoforganicmaterials.Thefootingsforthestructures,toprovideprotectionfromwinterfrostpenetration,aretobeatleast18inchesbelowgroundsurface.(Burwell,D.,2016).
Theprojectedprojectdoesnothavereasontoexcavatemorethan3.5feettoreachthefoundationofthebridgeabutment;however,thiswillnonethelessresultindisruptionofnativesubgrade.ThiswillleavetheNativesubgradewillbesusceptibleto
Page 19
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
17
degradationwhichwillincludethelossofshearstrengthifexposedtoconstructionequipmentand/orweather.
Intheeventofaprecipitationeventpriortosubgradeimprovementsandthein-situearthbecomesaturated,thesaidnativesubgradewilllikelybecomeunsuitableforsupportingastructuralfoundation.Ifnativesoilishighlymoisturesensitiveitwillnoteffectivelycompact,andbecomesevenmoresooncedisturbed.Shouldnativesoilsbeingsoft,theremustbeanadditional12-inchlayerofquarryspallsaddedandcompactedwiththedriftintothesoftareas.Thisallowsforanincreaseinshearstrength.Thiscompositemustbeallowedtoset,protectedfromrain,foraperiodof24-48hours,thiswillallowthecompositeto“heal”andallowthepourwaterpressuretodissipate.
Thereexistsahighlevelofvariabilityforthedriftandweatherconditionsdependingonthetimeofyearinwhichtheconstructiontakesplace.Itisforthisreasonthatitisoftheutmostimportancethatproperinspectionofthenativesubgradeoccurs(tobecompletedbyacertifiedP.EorL.E.G)beforeanyconstructionbegin.
Inregardstobearingcapacityandthestrengthoftheearth,theglaciomarinedriftwithpreparationcansupportevenlyspreadloadsupto3,000poundspersquarefoot(PSF)-Thisallowsforthenetallowableweightbearingcapacity.Thiscapacitymaybeincreasedbyone-thirdforshorttermwindorseismicevents,thusallowingthenewbearingcapacitytobe4,000PSFforashortamountoftime.Again,footingsshouldbeaminimumof18incheswidetoallowforanevenspreadloadtothedrift.(Burwell,D.,2016)
3.1.2 ProposedActionImpactsThetemporaryfootbridgeistoberootedassoonaspossible,duringthewintermonths.Thiswilltakeplaceduringthewetseasonduringatimeofpeak,ornearpeakflowsofFeverCreek;duringthistimeframesoils,willbethemostsaturated.Becausethesoilislesssaturatedduringthesummermonths,thegroundwillbebetterequippedtobearaload,especiallyduringtheconstructionphase.Itisimportanttonotethatwithoutsoilbanksupportsimplemented,theseasonablyhigherflowsofFeverCreekwillcontinuetowashawaysoilsoftheembankmentwhichwillleadtoalossofbankstability.
Duringthesummerof2017,asecondconstructioneventwilloccurwhereinthetemporarybridgewillberemoved,andapermanentbridgewillbeconstructedinitsplace.ThisactionistobecompletedinthesummerwhenFeverCreek’sflowsareattheirlowestandwhentherehashistoricallybeentheleastamountofsoilsaturationoftheyear.Becausesoilswouldbeimpactedwhentheyweremorearid,andthereforemoredry,therewouldbetheleastamountofcalculatedimpactsforaconstructionprojectto
Page 20
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
18
occur.Becauseofthepreviousconstructionmonthsbefore,thesoilwillbecompromisedandlikelynotstructurallysoundwithoutaddedmaterials.
MitigationsOncenativesoilisdisturbed,itwillnotbefittouseasstructuralfillasthenativesoilwillnotcompacteffectivelyduetoitshighmoisturesensitivity.Nativesoilistobememovedoffsitesoasnottomixwiththestructurally-soundfill.Additionally,specialmeasuresmayneedtobetakentoensurethestabilityofthebankfromfurtherdegradation.Temporaryfootbridgemitigations:Toaccommodateforthewetseason,duringtheproject’sconstructionallworkingsurfacesthatundergorepeatedorregularfoottrafficshouldbecoveredwithageotechnical fabric.Thisistoensuretheseparationofthedriftandtoaideintheassistanceofspreadingthenewloadoutonthealreadypresentnativesoils.Afterthegeotechnicalfabric,hasbeenplaced,itisoftheutmostimportancethataCSBClayerbeplaced,thiswillallowfortheprotectionofthenativein-situsoilsfrombecomingdisturbedorloosefromthecommencingconstruction.(Burwell,D.,2016)
CommonlyobservedwetseasonpracticesinconjunctionwiththeBestManagementPracticesshouldbeimplemented,theseincludeconstructionandtruckwash-downareastoreducetheamountoferosionandotheroff-siteimpacts.(Burwell,D.,2016)
PermanentreplacementbridgeMitigations:DuringthedrysummerseasonFeverCreekflowrates,willbeseasonallylowandthereforethegroundwillbetheleastsaturatedandmoststable.Despitethis,wetseasonprotocolshouldbefollowedduringthedryseasonaswell,howeverwilllikelynotbeasdrastic.Itisadvisedthataconstructioneventoccurduringatimeofnorainsothatsoilswillbetheleastsaturatedandmoststabletosupportconstructionequipment.
Priortoeachconstructionevent,alicensedP.EorL.E.Gmustevaluatetheconditionofthesoilsimpactedanddecideifthesoilsandsurroundingeartharestableenoughtosupportaconstructionevent.Onceapprovalisobtained,constructionmaybeginwithadditionalmitigationsasassignedbytheevaluatingP.E.orL.E.G.
3.1.3 AlternativeActionImpactscompletedinwinterImpactswillbethesameasaboveforthewetseasonandthealternativeaction.MitigationMitigationmeasureswillbethesameasaboveforthewetseason.
Page 21
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
19
3.1.4 NoActionImpactsAnoactiondecisionwouldresultinnoadditionalnetimpactstotheearthandearthsoils.Theseelementswillcontinuetohaveanaturalseasonalvariabilityhastheyhavedoneforcenturies.
3.2Water3.2.1ExistingConditionsTheproposedsiteofthenewpedestrianbridgehasmanyconcernssurroundingmanipulationofexistingwaterconditions,mainlysurroundingFeverCreek,andwetlands.TheApril2016wetlanddelineationsurveyhighlightedtwodistinctwetlands,WetlandAandBasshowninFigure5fromElementSolution,intheareaproposedforthenewbridge.ThewetlandsareclassifiedascategoryIIandIII,andbothgettheirwaterfrompuddlingrainwaterandaredryinsummer.Thetotalareathatthewetlandcoversisover4,550ft2,whichismostthesite.ThedirectionofthewaterflowisfromthewetlandsonsiteintoFeverCreek.Wetlandsarenotexpectedtobeinfluenceddirectlybytheriverinesystem.(ElementSolutionsetal.,2016)FeverCreekisafirstorderstreamandoneofthetributariestoWhatcomCreek.TheheadwatersstartinFeverCreekNatureAreaandflowthroughRooseveltNatureAreaandprivateresidencesbeforeitreachestheproposedsite.Waterqualityduetoincreasedurbanizationisimpaired,includinghighlevelsofturbidity,fecalcoliform,etc.(Shannahan,J.,LaCroix,R.,Cusimano,B.,&Hood,S.,2004).Streamflowinthewinterishigherthaninthesummer,duetotheseasonalnatureofthewetlandsfromwhichthewaterflows(ElementSolutionset.al,2016).
BellinghamHabitatRestorationreviewtherestorationofthewetlandsalongFeverCreekwereconsideredahighpriority,whileFeverCreekitselfhasalowpriorityforrestorationduetoitsverylowexistinghabitatfunctions(LaCroix,R.,2015).AnotherwatersourceisthestormwaterdraincomingfromRooseveltElementarySchool.Thelocationthattheelementaryschoolwaspreviouslyawetland.Thewater
Figure5:MapoflocationofWetlandAandBlocatedonandneartheworksite(ElementalSolutions2016).
Page 22
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
20
drainingfromthatoldwetlandflowsthroughthestormwaterpipesundertheproposedsiteandintothecreek.(ElementSolutionsetal.,2016)
3.2.2ProposedAction Impacts
Thetemporaryfootbridgewillbeinstalledinthewinterwhenthepeakflowseasonbegins.Thiswillmostlikelyaffectthesedimentreleaseintothestream,aswellaspossiblefishhabitatdisruption(M.JRobertson,D.A.Scruton,R.S.Gregory,andKeithD.Clarke,2006).
Duringthesummermonths,bothwetlandsonthesitewouldbeseasonallydry,andsurfacewaterinthewetlandareaisdry.Subsurface/Groundwaterflowintothestreamwouldbeatitsminimum,andthuswouldcauseFeverCreektobeatitslowestflowoftheyear(ElementSolutionsetal.,2016).Therefore,duringconstruction,thewaterinFeverCreekwouldbeminimallyimpactedfromincreasedturbidityfromtheincreaseoferosionoftheriverbanks.ThereisalsominimalriskofPolyaromatichydrocarbons(PAH)fromtheheavymachineryusedenteringthewatertablenowduetonosurfaceflow.
Mitigation
Tofurtherminimizeerosionandincreasedturbidityduringthereplacementbridgeconstruction,theCOBParksDepartmenthasaprocedurethatisusedinallsmallbridgereplacements.Thisprocedureincludesusingdamsandpumpstodivertthewateraroundtheconstructionsite,thenplacingmeshcatchscreentoreduceerosionwithintheworkarea.Ifanyfishweretobeneartheworkarea,theywouldbetransferredupordownstreamoftheworkareabytrainedbiologists(GinaAustin).
Impactstothewetlandmustbemitigatedatarateofthreetoonefortotalimpactedarea.Theymustimprovetheotherexistingwetlandsalongthesite,andsurroundingarea(WSDOT,2008).
3.2.3AlternativeAction Impacts
Duringthewintermonths,bothwetlandsatthesitewillbewet,andsurfacewaterisexpected.Subsurfaceandgroundwaterflowintothestreamisexpectedtobeatmaximumflowrates,andthusFeverCreekwouldbehighalongitsbanks(ElementSolutionsetal.,2016).Theriskofsedimentsenteringthewaterwouldbehigh.ThereisahighpotentialforchemicalssuchasPAH’sfromheavymachinerythatwouldbewashedintothestreamorpoolinthewetlandduetohighsurfaceflow.
Page 23
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
21
MitigationSmallbridgereplacementmitigationproceduresoutlinedbytheCityofBellinghamParksDepartmentwillbethesameasabove,howevermoredifficulttoimplementduringthewinterduetotheincreasedstreamflowthroughthearea.Mitigationfortheareaofthewetlandsimpactedbythebridgelocationmovingarethesameasabove.
3.2.4NoAction
ImpactNotreplacingorplacingatemporarybridgewillcausemorefoottrafficthroughFeverCreekandWetlandA,erodingthebanksfurtherandharmingthewetland.Fishhabitatsuchaspebblecountandsedimentationmaybeimpacted.Fecalcoliformlevelscouldalsoincreaseifthetemporaryfootbridgeisnotinstalled(ElementSolutionetal.,2016).
MitigationRecommendedwetlandrestoration(LaCroixR.,2015),andclosureofthewalkwayissuggested.
3.3 Air
3.3.1ExistingConditionsAirpollutantsofconcernasexpressedbyfederalagenciessuchastheEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA,2015)aredescribedbelow.ThesecoincidewiththoseprioritizedbylocaldepartmentssuchastheNorthwestCleanAirAgency(NWCAA)(NWCAA,2016)andorganizationsliketheAmericanLungAssociation(AmericanLungAssociationetal.,2016);andsoarethefocusofairqualityconcernsofavarietyofprojecttypes.Monitoredpollutantsare:Lead(Pb),CarbonMonoxide(CO),variousNitrogenOxides(generalizedtotheformulaNOx),SulfurDioxide(SO2),Ozone(O3),andParticulateMatter10(PM10)andParticulateMatter2.5(PM2.5)whichrefertoaparticlesizeof10microns(micrometers)and2.5micronsrespectively.TheNWCAAoverseesahandfulofairqualitymonitoringstationsthroughoutWhatcomCounty,includingonelocatedinBellinghamthatmonitorssomeofthesedifferentpollutants(DepartmentofEcology,2016).LeadLeadisanaturallyoccurringmetalandhasbeendeemedtoxicbythescientificcommunity.Sincetheeliminationofleadfromgasoline,paints,andmanyotherproducts,leadisgenerallynotmonitoredfromambientairunlessindustrialprocessesthatutilizethismaterialmakeitnecessarytodoso(NWCAA,2016).LeadasapollutantisnotregularlymonitoredwithinthecityofBellinghamorWhatcomCountyandthusnodataisavailableforexistingairleadlevels(PortofBellingham,2010July;EPA,2015).
Page 24
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
22
CarbonMonoxideThebiggestsourceofCOisusuallyvehiclesandothercombustionprocesses(e.g.,heatingandindustrialprocesses).TheonlycontributingfactorsofCOemissionswithintheproposedprojectareaarethoseduetolocaltrafficfromthestreetsofSuperior,Michigan,EastIllinois,andNewHavenPlace.Duetothelowtrafficlevelsinthisresidentialareaandthelackofthroughstreets,COemissionsarelowandarethereforenotmonitoredatthislocationorwithinthecityofBellingham(PortofBellingham,2010July;EPA,2015).NitrogenOxidesNitrogenOxidesareveryreactiveandtendtohaveaveryhighglobalwarmingpotential,alongwithpotentialadversehealtheffects,forinstanceforminghazardouscompoundssuchasperoxyacylnitrates(O'Neil,G.,2016October).NitrousOxide(N2O)isaproductofreactionswithNOxcompoundsthat,pertheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC),hasaroughly300xglobalwarmingpotentialtothatofcarbondioxide(IPCC,2007).DuetoalackofindustrialsourcesintheBellinghamarea,therearenoNOxmonitoringstationsandthusalackofdataforcreatingabaselineofNOxpollutants(EPA,2015).However,peranEIScompletedbythePortofBellinghaminregardstotheoldGeorgiaPacificsiteandwaterfrontdistrict,BellinghamcurrentlymeetslocalandfederalstandardsonNOxemissions(PortofBellingham,2010July).SulfurDioxideSimilartoNOx’s,SO2comesfromvariousformsofSulfurOxides(SOx),mostofwhichcomefromelectricgeneratingfacilitiesthatburnfuelswithhighersulfurcontents(typicallycoal).SO2isamajorcontributortoacidrainduetoitsabilitytodissolveinwater.ThereisoneSO2monitoringfacilityinWhatcomCounty,butnostationlocatedwithinthecityofBellingham(NWCAA,2016).Asof2015theEPAreportednoavailabledataformeasuringSO2levelsinBellingham(EPA,2015).OzoneOftheselectedairpollutants,ozoneisamoreregionallybasedandwidespreadtypeasopposedtoapointsourceemission.Bellinghamcontainsamonitoringstationcapableofmeasuringthispollutant,andper2015EPAdatathehighestreachedlevelofozonewas0.048ppmforan8-hourconcentrationreading(EPA,2015).ThisfallsbelowthecurrentU.S.NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)of0.070ppm(EPA,2016September16).PM2.5andPM10Alongwithozone,BellinghamalsohasanairmonitoringstationoperatedbytheNWCAAforparticulatematter.ThisstationislocatedonYewStreetneartheintersectionofYewStreetandAlabamaStreet,veryclosetotheproposedactionsite(DepartmentofEcology,2016).Asof2015theEPAlistedBellinghamashavinginsufficientdatatodecideonambientairparticulatematterlevels(EPA,2015);however,inthe2008PortofBellinghamEIStheyreportbothPM2.5andPM10levelsfor
Page 25
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
23
the2005year.Bothweremeasuredin24-hourranges,withPM2.5levelsreachingamaximumof21microgramspercubicmeterwhiletheconcentrationofPM10reachedamaximumof26microgramspercubicmeter(PortofBellingham,2010July).BothofthesefallwithinacceptablelevelsaccordingtotheU.S.NAAQS(EPA,2016September16).AccordingtothedatacollectedbytheEPAusingairmonitoringstationswithinBellinghamandlocatedthroughWhatcomCounty,theairqualityisdeterminedonascaleknownastheAirQualityIndex(AQI).ForbothozoneandshorttermPM2.5Bellinghamranksasoneofonly8citiesthatmaintainedastandingof"good"ontheAQIfortheyear2015.Thisisthehighestairqualityratingavailableandindicatesthattheregionneverexperiencedanydaysofunhealthyairquality(AmericanLungAssociationetal.,2016).Thisstandingmeetsandexceedsbothfederalandlocalregulationsforambientairquality.TheacceptablelevelsaccordingtotheNAAQSforeachpreviouslydiscussedpollutantroughlycorrespondtoanumericalvalueof100ontheAQI(AirQualityIndex,n.d.).
Table3.TheEPA'sAirQualityIndex.Numericalvaluesareastandardizationbasedonactualconcentrationsandareappliedtoeachairhazardindividually(AirNow,n.d.).
3.3.2ProposedActionImpacts
Dependingontheconstructionmethodsusedtoinstallthepermanentbridgereplacement,airqualityimpactsmayvary.Adrysummerseasonwillmeanstagnantairandlessrain.Dustfromtrailmaintenanceandremovalofexistingfootingswillbeofgreatestconcern.Thismayleadtoreducedairqualityintheimmediateareabecauseofincreasedparticulatematter.Additionally,windpatternsduringtheprojecttimeframe
Page 26
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
24
mayhaveanimpactonthelocationofdustandparticulatematteraccumulation.Exactestimatesareproblematictodeterminequantitativelyhoweverbecauseofdifficultieswithlongtermweatherpredictability.Longdistancesofparticulatedistributionareunlikelyastheproximityofnaturalandman-madebarriers(e.g.treesandhouses)preventthis.
Thefoundationsofthenewpermanentbridgewillbeofconcrete(Austin,G.,2016October)anditiswellestablishedthatthecementmanufactureindustryreleasesalotofairpollutants;however,theseareassociatedwithcementproductionwhichwillhappenoffsite.Thecuringofthecementattheproposedactionsitewillnotcontributetoanyairqualityissues(Wilson,A.,1993March/April).
Table4.Engineemissionlevelsforvariouscompounds.*HCindicationtotalhydrocarbons.Tablederivedfromoriginalsource(Helmer,K.,etal.,n.d.).
EngineModel
horsepower(hp)
EmissionsLevels(g/hp-hr)
HC CO CO2 NOx PMYanmar2TNE68
14 0.328-0.534 2.878-5.648 825-843 4.167-4.320 0.460-0.929
YanmarL100AE-DE
9 1.512-1.556 8.305-9.344 706-719 6.159-6.407 1.263-1.587
LombardiniLDW903
20 0.242-0.619 2.766-3.072 767-798 3.004-3.355 0.609-0.636
KubotaV2203B
49 0.075-0.090 1.053-1.234 668-671 4.253-4.272 0.600-0.615
Hatz1B30 7 0.628-0.633 4.025-4.220 758-783 5.126-5.347 0.510-0.523
Otherairpollutantswillbedependentonwhetherheavymachineryisusedfortheproposedaction.Withoutanymachinery(excavatorsordiggers), dustwillbetheprimaryairhazard.Nootheremissionsasreferredtoabovewillbeofconcern(Section3.3.1).Combustionemissionsaremeasuredbasedonenginetypeandsize.Ifanexcavatorisuseditwillbesmall,becausetheinstallationisnotcomplex,andit'soccurringinaconfinedright-of-way.ForthepurposesofthisEIAitisassumedanyenginewouldbelessthan50horsepower.Table4showsfivedifferentenginestestedforavarietyofemissions(Helmer,K.,etal.,n.d.).Theseareprovidedonagramofpollutantperhorsepowerperhourofusage(g/hp-hr).Dependingonthelengthoftimeofuseandsizeoftheengine,totalemissionsforconstructioncanbeestimatedgiventhisbaselinedata.ThiscanthenbeextrapolatedtooverallsiteairqualityusingtheparameterswithintheAQIandsizeoftheproposedsite.
Inadditiontotheabove-mentionedemissions,PAH'sarereleasedaspartofdieselenginecombustionandaredirectlyrelatedtoparticulatematter(specificallyPM2.5)
Page 27
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
25
levels.ItcanbedifficulttodetermineexactPAHemissionratesasPAHconcentrationsareduetodieselfueltypeandaromatichydrocarboncontent.IthasbeendeterminedthoughthatPAHcontentindieselemissionsisnogreaterthan1%ofthePMmassofdieselengineexhaust(NCEA,2002May).Morespecifically,onlyPAHcompoundscomposedof3-5aromatichydrocarbonringshavetheappropriatevaporpressuretovolatizeandremainintheambientair(NCEA,2002May).
Methodsofinstallationofatemporarypedestrianbridgemayaddadditionalimpactstoairqualityattheproposedactionsite.Ifnotemporarybridgeistobeaddedornomachineryistobeused,thennoadditionalairqualityimpactsexistfortheproposedaction.Ifmachineryisusedinitsinstallationand/orremoval,thenadditionalemissionswillbeaccruedperthedatainTable4.TheaspectofatemporarybridgeexistingoverFeverCreekwillnotinitselfcauseanyadditionalairqualityissues.
MitigationIfheavymachineryistobeusedfortheproposedaction,generallythereisnostandardmethodtominimizeexhaustemissionsandparticulatesotherthanthestandardcomponentsthatalreadyexistinstalled.Howeveritmaybepossibletochooseaspecificmachinewithasmallerengineorabetteremissionsprofile.Thiswillbedeterminedorhinderedbytheexacttypeand/orseverityofgroundworknecessary.
Withrespecttodustfromphysicalconstructionand/orwindthereareseveralmitigationtechniquesthatcanbeemployed.Layeringmaterialoverthesoiloftheworksitewillalleviatedustupliftintotheair.Gravel,mulch,straw,orphysicallysprayingwatercanbeused.MinimizingtheareaofvegetationclearingandutilizingtimeofoperationsaftervegetationclearingalsoacttodecreasePM(dust)release(DOE,2016July).
3.3.3AlternativeActionImpactsEmissionsfromconstructionequipmentforthealternativeactionwillmirrorthatoftheproposedaction(Section3.3.2.1).Thetimeofyearwillhavenoeffectontypeofemissionsthatarereleasedatthesitefromoperatingmachinery.Dependingonweatherandhowthisaffectsthescheduledlengthofconstruction,emissiontotalsmaychangeifoperatingtimesincrease.ThesewillstillbeestablishedfrombaselinefactorsfromTable4.
Dependingonweatherpatterns,airqualityfromdustmayvaryfromthatoftheproposedaction.Increasedwindduringthewinterseasonmayhelptoremovedustfromthesite,howeverthispresentstheimplicationofmovingthisPMintoadjacentresidentialareas,affectingthoseclosesttothesite.Similarly,anincreaseinrainwillhelptoreducedustaccumulationintheairaltogetherduringconstruction.
Page 28
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
26
MitigationSincetheimpactsforthealternativeactionarethesameasthatoftheproposedaction,themitigationsforthealternativeactionremainthesameaswell(Section3.3.2.2).However,typicalwinterweatherpatternsleadtoincreasedrainwithinthealternativeactiontimeframe,thuskeepingthegroundandsoilsinandaroundtheproposedactionsitewettedviaphysicalmeanswillnotbenecessary.
3.3.4NoActionImpactsHavingnofutureactionwiththesitewillresultinnochangestothecurrentairqualityatthecurrentproposedactionlocation.Foottrafficwillremainasis,butwillstillbelowerthanitwaswhenabridgewasinplace.AnydustupliftedbyfoottrafficcrossingFeverCreekwillbeofequalorlowervaluethanwhenabridgewasonthislocation.Ifnobridgereplacementshouldoccur,itislikelythatvehicletrafficwillincreaseduetosomechildrenbeingdriventoandfromschoolwhichwillincreaseairpollutants.Thesepollutantsarenothowevercontainedwithintheimmediatelocationoftheproposedactionsiteanditisdifficulttoconcludeadirectcorrelationbetweenairqualityofthesiteandincreasedvehiculartraffic.
3.4 Flora&Fauna3.4.1ExistingEnvironmentThefloraandfaunapresentatthesiteoftheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeiscomposedofamixtureofnativeandinvasivespecies.
CommonflorathatispresentincludesDouglas-fir,Westernhemlock,andvinemaple,allofwhicharenativetotheregion(WashingtonNativePlantSociety2006).Someofthesespeciesareconsideredobligatewetlandspecies,meaningtheyareonlyfoundinwetlands,andthushelpwetlanddelineationinthearea.Theprimaryconcernforfloraintheareaistheabundanceofinvasivespecies,anddetrimentaleffectstowetlandflora.ThereigninginvasivespeciesareHimalayanblackberryandEnglishivy.FeverCreekisnotlistedasaprojectrestorationsitefor2017bytheCOB(COB2017),butareplacementofthepedestrianbridgewouldpromptremovalofinvasivespeciesandareintroductionofnativespecies.
Theprimaryfaunathatvisittheareaarelocalblack-taileddeerandraccoonspassingthroughandeatingsomeoftheflora(Relyea2007).FeverCreekisatributaryofWhatcomCreek,whichisafishbearingandspawningstream,butFeverCreekisnotastreamthathostssalmonspawningorotherfishpopulations(NSEA2016).Despitethelackofpresenceoffishinthecreek,thereispotentialforsalmonandotherfishpopulationstoswimupstreamduringpeakflows,makingitanareaofconcern.Takingthisintoaccount,reconstructionofthepedestrianbridgewouldneedtoensurethatpotentialfishhabitatisnotdegraded.
Page 29
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
27
3.4.2ProposedActionImpactsImpactsonfloraandfaunabypursuingtheproposedactionofwouldbelargelybeneficialbecauseinstallingatemporarybridgeimmediatelywoulddecreasethenumberofpeoplewhocontinuetocrossthebridgeillegally.Florawouldseelessfoottraffic,thereforepromotinggrowthandfaunahabitatwouldnolongerseedegradationfromthefoottrafficitexperienceswithoutabridge.Limitedflowswouldinsurelesssedimententeringthestreamaffectingsalmonandfishpopulationfurtherdownstream.
MitigationsTheCOBParksandRecreationDepartmentwouldberesponsibleforremovingandmanaginginvasivespeciesinthearea,inaccordancewiththethreetoonemitigationrequiredbyBellingham'sCityComprehensivePlan.InvasivespeciessuchasHimalayanblackberryandEnglishivyarecurrentlyoverwhelmingnativespecieswouldneedtobetakenout.ThismanagementcouldcomeintheformofapartnershipwithRooseveltElementarySchoolineffortstoinvolvestudentsandspreadawarenessoflocalecosystems.
3.4.3AlternativeActionImpactsImpactsonfloraandfaunawouldbelikethosedescribedinsection3.4.2.1,butthereismoreofapotentialforhabitatdestructionasconstructionwouldcommenceassoonaspossible.Potentialhabitatdestructionwouldbeacceleratedbyerosionspurredbyhighamountsofwaterpresentintheformsofstreamflowandprecipitation.PeakflowswitherosionwouldcauseincreasedimpactdownstreamtofishpopulationsinWhatcomCreek.
MitigationMitigationeffortswouldbelikethosedescribedinsection2.4.2.2.RemovalofinvasivespeciesandareintroductionofnativeflorabytheCOBParksandRecreationDepartmentwouldenhancethehabitatforfauna.Withconstructionofthenewpedestrianbridgetakingplaceduringthewetseason,anyeffortstoremoveinvasivespecieswouldbepostponeduntillaterinthedryseasontominimizeerosioncausedbyhigherstreamflowrates.3.4.4NoActionImpacts TakingnoactionandleavingtheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgesiteasiswouldallowinvasivespeciestogrowunregulatedandwoulddetractfromnativespecies'abilitiestothrive.Illegalcrossingofthestreamthatoccurshaspotentialtodegradepotentialhabitatsforfloraandfaunaalike.
Page 30
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
28
4.0BuiltEnvironmentElement
4.1Transportation4.1.1ExistingConditionsTheFeverCreekpedestrianandbikebridgeisahigh-volumebridge.Numberofpeoplepassingoverthebridgeaveragearoundonehundredandfifty.Trendsshowhigherusageinspringandwinterandlowerusageinwinterandthelowestinsummer(CityofBellingham,2015).Evenafterthebridgeremovedthesitestilllooksused.Thesitehastrampledvegetationandhumangarbage.Soildisturbanceslookedlikepeoplehadbeencrossingthroughthestream.Therewasamakeshiftbridgebuilt.TheCityofBellingham’srecommendedalternativeofwaitingtillsummertostartconstructionleavesthecreekvulnerableforanextendedperiodoftimes.Safetyisaconcernasflowratesrisewithchildrentryingtopassthroughthecreek,andalternativerouteslackingsidewalks.
Figure6.FeverCreekPedestrianCounts-GraphdisplaysnumberofpedestrianpassingovertheFeverCreekBridgeduringtheseasonsoftheyear.Trendsshowthatspringhavethehighestcrossingcountswhilesummerhasthelowestcrossingcounts(CityofBellingham,2015;CreatedbyNovellaRandall).
Page 31
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
29
4.1.2 ProposedActionImpactsTheproposedactionwouldleavethecreekvulnerabletohumanintrusionformultiplemonths before summer 2017. Human traffic through the stream will cause erosion,vegetation disturbance, and possible stream contamination. Effects of this will beadverse.
MitigationsAtemporarybridgecouldalleviatesomeoftheissuesandkeeppeopleonthepath.Anotheroptioncouldbebetterbarricadestokeepthepublicfromcrossingthestream.Theseeffortswouldalleviatenegativeinteractionsbetweenthepublicandthecreek.
4.1.3AlternativeActionImpactsFeverCreekwouldbenefitfromhavingconstructionstartassoonaspossible.Withacrewonthesite,thetrailwouldbeclosedoffmoreofficiallyandthemovementofpedestriansandbikerswouldstop,thusreducingtheimpactonthesurroundingenvironment.
MitigationsNomitigationstepswouldbeneededbecauseofaneutraleffectofnothavingpeoplepassthroughthesite.
4.1.4NoActionImpactsImpactsofnoactionwouldbelikethosediscussedin6.1.1,butindefinitely.Schoolchildrenandthoseusingthebridgewouldintrudethroughthecreekcausingadverseeffects.
Page 32
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
30
5.0ImpactMatrixTable5showsthedecisionmatrix,whichoutlinesthesignificantimpactstoenvironmentalelementsanalyzedfortheproposed,alternative,andnoactionalternatives.
Table5:DecisionMatrix
SEPAElements ProposedAction AlternativeAction NoAction
Earth -2 -1 -1
Water +1 -2 -1
Air -1 -1 0
Flora&Fauna +2 +1 -2
Transportation -1 +1 -2
Total -1 -2 -6
Table6:DecisionMatrixKey
1.6RecommendationsWerecommendthattheproposedactionispursuedasitwouldreduceenvironmentalimpactswhencomparedtothealternativeandnoactionplans.ReplacingtheFeverCreekpedestrianbridgewouldhelpprovideasafepathforelementaryschoolstudentstocommuteonfoottoandfromschooleachdaybyminimizingtimespentawayfrommotorizedtraffic.
6.0ConclusionandRecommendationReplacementofFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeisimportantforthecommunitytoprovideasafe,reliable,andenvironmentallyresponsiblebridgerunningeasttowestbetweenSuperiorStreetandMichiganStreet.Theformerbridgewasremovedprimarilyduetopublicsafetyconcerns.Throughreplacingthebridge,wehopetopreserveformermethodsoftravelwithintheRooseveltneighborhood,especiallyforstudentsofRooseveltElementarySchool.Aprimary
Score Impact
+1to+2 PositiveImpact(2beingsignificant)
-1to-2NegativeImpact
(2beingsignificant)
0 ZeroImpact
Page 33
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
31
concernforreplacementischildrenforcedtowalktoRooseveltElementarySchoolandsharestreetswithmotorizedtrafficwithoutsidewalks.
Weoutlinedthreeactionsforthissite:proposedaction,alternativeaction,andnoaction.TheproposedactionisputtingatemporarybridgeaccordingtostandardsoftheCOBParksandRecreationDepartmentimmediatelyuponapproval,andtheconstructionofapermanentbridgebasedoffofCOBdesignstandardsfollowingtheendoftheacademicyearstartingJune16,2016.Thealternativeactionistoinstallapermanentbridgeimmediately,butmitigateforenvironmentalconditionspresentduringthewinter.Thelastoption,noaction,istoleavethesiteofFeverCreekpedestrianbridgeasitisinitscurrentstate.Afterlookingatenvironmentalelementsincludingearth,water,air,floraandfauna,andtransportation,wedeterminedtheproposedactiontobethebestoptionforthislocation.Weconcludethatatemporarybridgeshouldbeplacedimmediatelyinthesite,theninstallapermanentbridgeinJune.
Page 34
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
32
7.0GlossaryHydric-characterizedby,relatingto,orrequiringanabundanceofmoistureIn-situ-inthenaturalororiginalpositionorplaceNoxious-physicallyharmfulordestructivetolivingbeingsLoam-asoilconsistingofafriablemixtureofvaryingproportionsofclay,silt,andsandSiltLoam-soilcontainingnotlessthan70percentsiltandclayandnotlessthan20percentsandSubgrade-asurfaceofearthorrockleveledofftoreceiveafoundation(asofaroad)Wetland-landorareas(asmarshesorswamps)thatarecoveredoftenintermittentlywithshallowwaterorhavesoilsaturatedwithmoisture
Page 35
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
33
8.0ReferencesAirNow.(n.d.).AirQualityIndex.Retrievedfrom
https://airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=aqibasics.aqiAustin,G.(2016,October).FeverCreekbridgereplacementinfosession.[PowerPointandlive
lecture].Retrievedfromprivatenotes.AmericanLungAssociation.(2016).StateoftheAir2016.Chicago,IL.Burwell,D.(2016).BellinghamFeverCreekPedestrianBridge:GeotechnicalInformation.
Bellingham,WA:RH2Engineering,Inc.September.CityofBellingham.(2016).RestorationProjectSites2017[Map].Bellingham,WA:Cityof
Bellingham.CityofBellingham.(2015).PedestrianandBicycleTrailUserCounts.InCityofBellingham.
Retrievedfromhttps://www.cob.org/documents/parks/parks-trails/trail-user-count/fever-creek-bridge-09-01-15-to-09-20-15.pdf
Coronado,C.(2016).NSEASpawningGroundsSurveys2015.Retrievedfromhttps://static1.squarespace.com/static/552eaedce4b0dc86eeb1cddd/t/5798edc5725e25f85fd4b699/1469640156394/Report+2015+Final.pdf
ElementSolutions,G.Austin,&CityofBellinghamParksandRecreation.(2016).CityofBellinghamCriticalAreasReportWetlandDelineation.
Harris,M.(2016).CityclosespedestrianbridgeatFeverCreek.Retrievedfromhttps://www.cob.org/news/Pages/features/City-closes-pedestrian-bridge-at-Fever-Creek.aspx
Helmer,K.,etal.(n.d.)RegulatedandAirToxicExhaustEmissionsfromNonroadDieselEnginesandEquipment.Washington,DC:UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency.
IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.(2007).IPCCFourthAssessmentReport:ClimateChange2007.Retrievedfromhttps://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html
Klungland,M.W.andM.McArthur.(1989).SoilSurveyofSkagitCountyArea,Washington,SoilConservationService,U.S.D.A.,WashingtonStateDepartmentofNaturalResources,andWashingtonStateUniversity,AgricultureResearchCenter.
NationalCenterforEnvironmentalAssessment:DieselTeam.(2002).HealthAssessmentDocumentforDieselEngineExhaust.Washington,DC:UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency.
NorthwestCleanAirAgency.(2016).AirQualityCenter.Retrievedfromhttp://nwcleanairwa.gov/air-quality-center/
O'Neil,G.(2016).Biofuels:EmissionsandAirQuality.[Powerpointandlivelecture].Retrievedfromprivatenotes.
PortofBellingham.(2010).TheWaterfrontDistrictRedevelopmentProject(FormerlyKnownasNewWhatcomRedevelopmentProject)FinalEnvironmentalImpactStatement.(FinalDraft).Bellingham,WA.
Relyea,K.(2007).Black-taileddeereasytospotlocally.TheBellinghamHerald.Retrievedfromhttp://www.bellinghamherald.com/sports/outdoors/article22195617.html
Page 36
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment FeverCreekBridgeReplacement
34
Robertson,M.J.,Scruton,D.A.,Gregory,R.S.,&Clarke,K.D.(2006).Effectofsuspendedsedimentonfreshwaterfishandfishhabitat(Canada,FisheriesandOceansCanada,ScienceBranch).St.Johns,NL:ScienceBranch,FisheriesandOceans.
Shannahan,J.,LaCroix,R.,Cusimano,B.,&Hood,S.(2004).WhatcomCreekFecalColiformTotalMaximumDailyLoadStudy.RetrievedOctober23,2016,fromhttps://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/0403015.pdf
UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency.(2015).AirQuality–CitiesandCounties[Datafile].Retrievedfromhttps://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-cities-and-counties
UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency.(2016).NAAQSTable.Washington,D.C.Retreivedfromhttps://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table
WashingtonNativePlantSociety.(2006).NativePlantsofWesternWashington:TheNaturalWaytoGrow[Brochure].Seattle,WA:WashingtonNativePlantSociety.
WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology.(2016).AirMonitoringSites.Retrievedfromhttps://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/enviwa/.
WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology.(2016).MethodsforDustControl.Olympia,WA.Retrievedfromhttps://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/96433.html
WashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation(WSDOT).(2008).WSDOTGuidanceonCompensatoryMitigationAreaCalculation(USA,DOT,WSDOT).Washington.
Wilson,A.(1993March/April).CementandConcrete:EnvironmentalConsiderations.EnvironmentalBuildingNews,2(2),1-11.