Environmental Flows Assessment • Objective Based Flow-Setting – In certain cases, people intend to have specific pre-defined ecological, economical and social objectives for the river. • Scenario Based Flow-Setting – if water managers are able to understand and make decision on water allocations and scenarios for trade offs in managing and balancing the water demands/requirements.
Environmental Flows Assessment. Objective Based Flow-Setting In certain cases, people intend to have specific pre-defined ecological, economical and social objectives for the river. Scenario Based Flow-Setting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Environmental Flows Assessment
• Objective Based Flow-Setting– In certain cases, people intend to have specific pre-defined ecological,
economical and social objectives for the river.
• Scenario Based Flow-Setting– if water managers are able to understand and make decision on water
allocations and scenarios for trade offs in managing and balancing the water demands/requirements.
Building Block Methodology
• Building Block Methodology – one of the most comprehensive methodology
– Bottom up approach
– Much detailed and can be tailored to suit local conditions
– Most frequently used holistic methodology
– Rigorous and well documented
Building Block Methodology
• Flexible to accommodate other local aspects, like religious and spiritual requirements (hence applicable for Indian rivers)
• Functions well in data-rich and data-poor situations
• Links to external stakeholders and public participation processes
• Applicable to regulated and non-regulated river regimes
• Moderate to highly resource intensive
Building Block Methodology
Stage A: Scoping Stage B: Preparation for theAssessment
Task 1: Initiate EFA assessment (level of detail, define methodology)
Task 8: Define reference conditions
Task 7: Ecological and Social Importance and Sensitivity
Task 3: Zone the study areaTask 4: Habitat integrityTask 5: Site SelectionTask 6: Surveys and measurementsBiological SurveysHydraulic survey Hydrological analysis
sustainable use of water resources in the Ganga to:
- Ensure ecological integrity-Provide livelihoods
- Maintain sacred values
Flow IndicatorsFish, Dolphins,
Invertebrates, Algae, Religious rites, Livelihoods,
Channel processes
• Zone I: Upper Reach (Gangotri to Rishikesh)
• Zone II: Reference zone(U/S of Garhmukteshwar to Narora)
• Zone III: Middle Reach(Narora to Farrukhabad)
• Zone IV: Lower Reach (Kannuaj to Kanpur)
Rishikesh
Kannauj
Narora
9
Zone 1 Gangotri to Rishikesh
Zone 3 Narora to
Farrukhabad
Zone 2 U/S of Garhmukteshwar
to Narora(Reference Zone)
Zone 4 Kannauj to
Kanpur
1. Hydrology - Identify and review previous hydrological modeling
studies and assessment of their usability
- To set up model and calibrate under existing conditions of land and water use
- Examine the feasibility of different ways of modeling the past ‘natural’ and present-day flows, using observed flow data
Components
2. Fluvial Geomorphology and hydraulic modeling for maintaining sustainable flows
- Analysis of sediments in the river, and the assessment of the effects that will result from different flow regimes
- Analyse the channel and floodplain morphology in terms of the geomorphic features, and their stability
- Generate the cross section and longitudinal profile for hydraulic modelling
3. Habitat preferences of selected Aquatic species
– Assess present condition in terms of the difference between the reference condition and survey results
– Describe measured depths, average velocities and substratum types most commonly associated with sensitive species and families, and/or with maximum biodiversity
Components
4. Economic and Livelihood objectives for Maintaining Sustainable Flows
- Evaluate livelihood activities and its implications on environmental flows of the river
5. Assessment of Cultural & Spiritual in stream flow required for Maintaining Sustainable Flows
– Representation of the river in mythology, folklore, folk art and popular literature and art
– Historical evidence of civilizations along the river, and its influence on society
– Cultural, Religious, spiritual importance of the Ganga, with focus on rituals and festivals
6. Water Quality and Pollution
– Generation of data on water quality parameters that is not available from any sources, but considered essential by the water quality group (samples from 30 locations)
– Assessment of various types of pollution loads in different stretches/sub-stretches
Components
Arriving at E-FlowsSTEP 1: Hydrology and Hydraulics Cross Sections for
each zone
STEP 2: Flow motivationsFlow recommendations based on requirements of biodiversity, Livelihoods, Culture/Spiritual needs, Geomorphology
Maintenance FlowsThe Maintenance Flows are for "normal" years, not very wet or not very dry, here one would expect all the ecological functions and processes:
fish breeding floodplain wetlands full sediment transport etc.
Maintenance Flows would be equaled or exceeded during 70 years out of 100; however flows would be lower for 30 years out of 100 or in other words, 70% probability on the flow duration curve.
For a long-term E-Flow, the water volume required would be at maintenance recommendations or higher for 70% of the time, and between drought and maintenance for 30% of the time.
STEP 3: Calculating critical flows
Critical flows• Kaudiyala:
– January maintenance flow: fluvial geomorphology
– August maintenance flow: biodiversity• Kachla Ghat & Bithoor:
– August flows (both during maintenance and drought years): cultural and spiritual
• Almost half of the critical flow recommendations were influenced by biodiversity requirements
STEP 4: Calculating annual E-Flows requirements
– Driest and wettest months under maintenance and drought conditions (January – driest month and August – wettest month)
– E-Flows values were calculated, based on inputs from working groups, by hydrologist for other months of the year by means of interpolation
– Monthly flow volumes for each month of the year for low-flow and high-flow components calculated
Arriving at E-flows
Results: Zone 1, Maintenance Flows
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Months
Flow
Vol
ume,
MCM
maintenance low maintenance high natural total
Site -Kaudiyala
72% MARE-Flows: 72% of Mean Annual Runoff
Present day flows could not be calculated, as flow release data from the Tehri Dam was not available
maintenance low maintenance high natural total Present
Site –Kachla Ghat 45% MAR
E-Flows requirement: 45% of MAR
Present day flows does not meet E-Flows requirement during the lean season
Results - Zone 4: Kanauj- Kanpur Maintenance Flows
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Months
Flow
Volum
e, M
CM
maintenance low maintenance high natural total Present
Site EF4 – Bithur
47% MARE-Flows: 47% of MAR
Present day flows not meeting E-Flows requirements for lean months
• Access to observed long term hydrological data, is critical for assessing flows and this would have considerably increased the confidence in the environmental flow assessment.
• Further calibration and verification of the existing rated cross-sections, and the establishment of additional cross-sections, would also increase confidence in the flow recommendations
• Relationships between indicator fish, invertebrates and flow would allow more precise flow recommendations
• More precise relationships between water quality parameters and flow would have allowed the prediction of the effects of recommended flows on water quality to be assessed
Key Issues
E-flows• Not a one time flow; Regime of flows • Assess E-flows using a holistic approach:
hydrology, hydraulics, fluvial geomorphology, water quality, socio-cultural-spiritual, biodiversity and livelihood
• Need to be an integral part of the EIA & CIA – Bottoms up-project, sub-basin to basin level; – Existing projects – Trade-off analysis
• Need to place it in the context of river basin management plan
E-flows• Implementation & monitoring
– Joint monitoring– Whether required releases are being made– Impacts
• Adaptive process needed in E-flows assessment and implementation
• The EF process should be embedded in a framework of inclusive stakeholder understanding and participation, and preferably within a broader context of IWRM
Partners
Facilitation: Prof Jay O’Keeffe, (formerly UNESCO-IHE, Netherlands) & Dr Vladimir Smakhtin, IWMI Biodiversity: Prof Prakash Nautiyal, Garhwal UniversityCultural/Spiritual: Prof Ravi Chopra, People’s Science InstituteLivelihoods: Prof Murali Prasad, IIT KanpurGeomorphology: Prof Rajiv Sinha, IIT KanpurWater Quality: Prof Vinod Tare, IIT KanpurHydraulics: Prof A K Gosain, IIT DelhiHydrology: Dr Vladimir Smakhtin, Dr Luna Bharati, IWMI
THANK YOU
Building Block Methodology
Assessment Method
Basis Cost/time Conf-idence
Example
Look-up tables Hydrology Small Low Tennant
Time Series models Hydrology Small/Medium Low IHA
Rated X-Section models
Hydraulics Medium Medium Intermediate (SA)
Habitat Models Hydraulics/Ecology High Medium IFIM
Regional Hydrology/Ecology High (initial) Medium ELOHA/Desktop