Page 1
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention
ISSN (Online): 2319 – 6718, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 670X
www.ijpsi.org Volume 4 Issue 8 ‖ August 2015 ‖ PP.44-58
www.ijpsi.org 44 | P a g e
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of Ritonavir: A Comparative
study using various Carriers and Techniques
1A. Sarada,
2D. Lohithasu,
3V. Chamundeswari,
1D.Midhun Kumar and
3 S. Ramya
1Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, A.U. College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University,
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2Division of Pharmaceutics, GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra
Pradesh, India. 3Maharajah’s College of Pharmacy, Phoolbaugh, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Abstract: Aim of study: The aim of present work is to study the release of Ritonavir from solid dispersions
with different grades of PEGs and cyclodextrins using various techniques like physical mixing, solvent
evaporation, melting technique and kneading.
Material and methods: Different drug-to-polymer ratios were prepared to investigate the appropriate
concentration of polymer required to enhance the solubility of the drug and improve its release kinetics. The
physicochemical properties of dispersions were evaluated by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR), the study of FTIR could not show significant interaction between Ritonavir and the polymers
incorporated i.e., PEGs and cyclodextrins. The Polymeric dispersions prepared were evaluated for the release
of ritonavir over a period of 1 hour in 0.1N HCl using USP type II dissolution apparatus. The in vitro drug
release study revealed that the dispersion techniques have increased the dissolution rate.
Conclusions: It concluded that the various grades of PEGs (PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 8000, PEG 20000),
beta cyclodextrins and hydroxyl propyl beta cycldextrins were used in preparation of polymer dispersions for
improving the dissolution and physical stability by various techniques. The in vitro release profile and the
mathematical models indicate that release of Ritonavir can be effectively increased from a formulation
containing polymeric dispersion of PEG grade 20,000 and inclusion complexes of Hydroxy propyl beta
cyclodextrins.
Keywords: Polymeric dispersion, Ritonavir, Polyethylene glycols (PEGs), Cyclodextrins.
I. INTRODUCTION Ritonavir shows more release than that of pure drug due to nano size dispersion and the solid
dispersion prepared by solvent evaporation method is a promising approach for the bioavailability enhancement
of Ritonavir [1].The approaches used to overcome the insufficient bioavailability are reduction of particle-size
which includes microsizing and nanosizing, salt formation, solubilization, use of surfactants, polymorphism,
liquisolid technique [2,8] and complexation with β cyclodextrins to increase the oral bioavailability of poorly
water-soluble drugs[3]. Solid dispersion can produce a solid dosage form having the active in an amorphous
state or in a molecular dispersion state. The solid dispersion is used to enhance the dissolution rate by drug
particle size reduction, solublization effect of the carrier, invention of amorphous state and molecular interaction
between the drug and carrier [4]. Ritonavir is practically insoluble in water. It is used for the treatment of
human immune deficiency disease. The selected drug belongs to BCS class II basing on their solubility and
permeability. Ritonavir is an anti HIV drug which acts by inhibiting the protease enzymatic action. Ritonavir
pure drug is known to have high purity and satisfactory stability. However, it has low solubility in water and
thus is not suitable for oral administration. Conversion of Ritonavir pure drug into an amorphous form leads to
high water solubility and improves the usefulness of Ritonavir in the therapy of disease. But amorphous
materials are thermodynamically unstable and therefore show some tendency to crystallize spontaneously to
variations in the pH, temperature and moisture[5-7]. Hence in the present work it was planned to prepare
Ritonavir polymer dispersions for improving the dissolution and physical stability. For this, we have selected
various grades of Polyethylene glycol .i.e. PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 8000, PEG 20000, Beta cyclodextrins
and Hydroxy propyl beta cyclodextrins. These polymer dispersions were prepared by various techniques and
evaluated for their effectiveness in improving the disolution rate and improving the physical stability of
Ritonavir.
Page 2
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 45 | P a g e
The primary objective of the present work was to improve the solubility of poorly soluble drug by
preparing polymeric dispersions and characterizes the properties of polymeric dispersions formulation using
analytical methods like DSC and FTIR studies. The study also includes observation of the effect of different
polymers and their concentration on the drug solubility parameters to improve the bioavailability of the drug.
The present work involves preparation and evaluation of Ritonavir polymer solid dispersions.
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ritonavir was received as a gift sample from Hetero drug limited (Hyderabad, India). Polyethylene
glycol 4000, 6000, 8000 and 20000 were procured from S.D. Fine Chemicals Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Beta
cyclodextrins and hydroxyl propyl beta cycldextrins purchased from Cavitron, USA. Other chemicals and
reagents used were purchased from Merck Limited (Mumbai, India) and were of analytical grade.
Methods:
In this present study, the polymeric dispersions were prepared by different methods. Polyethylene glycols (PEG
4000, PEG 6000, PEG 8000, PEG 20000), beta cyclodextrins and hydroxyl propyl beta cyclodextrins were used
for the preparation of polymeric dispersions. All the polymeric dispersions were prepared from drug to polymer
ratios about 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4. Physical mixing technique is used for preparation of polymeric
dispersions in various ratios of 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:1 and 1:2 in a mortar and pestle for 20 minutes as well as solvent
evaporation technique (dissolved in methanol, then removed by evaporation under reduced pressure) is used for
preparation of polymeric dispersions in various ratios of 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4. Melting technique
(carrier is melted and added the drug to carrier at same temperature, cooled) is used for preparation of polymeric
dispersions in various ratios of 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3. Hydroxy propyl beta cyclo dextrins and cyclo
dextrins were also used in various proportions.
Calibration curve of Ritonavir in 0.1 N HCl Analytical Methods: In this present study, UV spectroscopic method was employed to determine absorbance
maxima( max) and construct the standard calibration curve of Ritonavir in 0.1 N HCl.
Preparation of 0.1 N HCl : 8.5 ml of hydrochloric acid was added to 200 ml of distilled water and the final
volume was made up to the 1000 ml with water.
Estimation of Ritonavir in 0.1 N HCl
Determination of λmax
First the drug was dissolved in about 1 ml of methanol and the volume was made up to get various standard
solutions using 0.1N HCl media. Most of drugs absorbs light in UV region (200-400 nm), since they are
generally aromatic or contain double bonds. An absorption maximum was determined using 0.1 N HCl.
Solutions ranging from 10-50 µg/ml was scanned from 200-400 nm using double beam UV spectrophotometer
(SL 210, M/s Elico Pvt. Ltd., India) to determine absorption maximum of Ritonavir. The absorption maximum
was found to be 245 nm.
Preparation of Ritonavir standard stock solution
Stock solution of 1000 µg/ml solutions was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of Ritonavir in 100 ml of 0.1 N HCl,
in a 100 ml volumetric flask. From this solution 10 ml was taken and diluted to 100 ml of 0.1 N HCl to give a
concentration 100 µg/ml. From the above standard stock solution, Ritonavir was subsequently diluted with
above selected solvent media to obtain a series of dilution containing 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 µg of Ritonavir /ml.
The absorbance of the above dilutions were measured at 245 nm using double beam UV spectrophotometer (SL
210, M/s Elico Pvt. Ltd., India) at 245 nm using pure solvent as blank. The absorbance values were plotted
against concentration of Ritonavir as shown in the Fig.1. The method obeyed beer’s law in the concentration
ranges from 10-50 µg/ml. Reproducibility of the method was tested by analyzing six separately weighed
samples of Ritonavir. The relative standard deviation (RSD) in estimated values was found to be <1. The low
RSD values indicated that the method is reproducible. Thus the method was found to be suitable for the
estimation of Ritonavir contents in the dissolution fluids.
Drug-excipients compatibility studies Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR): The pure drug and drug-excipients compatibility studies
were carried out by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR). The pellets were prepared on KBr under
hydraulic pressure of 150 kg/ cm2, the spectra were scanned over the wave number range of 4000 to 400 cm
-1 at
the ambient temperature. The results were shown in Fig.2.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): DSC study was performed using DSC-60 Calorimeter. Samples
were sealed in aluminum crucibles (40 µL) and the DSC thermograms were reported at a heating rate of 20 °C/
min under dry air flow between 30 °C-300 °C. The results were shown in Fig.3.
Page 3
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 46 | P a g e
Phase solubility studies: Phase solubility studies showed a linear increase of drug solubility with an increase of
the concentration of each examined carrier and have been attributed to the probable formation of weak
complexes. On the other hand, the enhancement of the drug solubility in the aqueous carrier solution could be
equally well explained by the co-solvent effect of the carrier. It has been found that hydrophilic carriers mainly
interact with drug molecules by electrostatic bonds(ion-to-ion, ion-to-dipole, and dipole- to –dipole bonds) even
though other types of forces, such as vander waals forces and hydrogen bonds, can frequently play a role in the
drug carrier interaction. The drug solubility increased linearly with increasing polymer concentration.
Drug content: The formulations (equivalent to 25 mg of Ritonavir) were dissolved in small amount of
methanol, then final volume made up to 100 ml of 0.1 N HCl, then filtered and diluted with 0.1 N HCl, then find
out the drug content using UV spectrophotometer at 245 nm. The percentage of drug content for all the
formulations was found to be 86.14 ± 1.09- 99.09 ± 1.98% of Ritonavir, it complies with official specifications.
The results were shown in Table 1.
In vitro studies: All the prepared formulations of Ritonavir were subjected to in vitro release studies these
studies were carried out using USP type II dissolution apparatus, 900 ml of pH1.2 hydrochloric acid buffer at
37±0.5 οC, 50 rpm and 5 ml of sample were withdrawn and replaced with fresh media to maintain sink
conditions. The results were shown in Fig. 4 to Fig. 15. The results obtained in in vitro release studies were
plotted in different model of data treatment as follows:
1. Cumulative percent drug released vs. time (zero order rate kinetics)
2. Log cumulative percent drug retained vs. time (First Order rate Kinetics)
3. Log cumulative percent drug released vs. square root of time (Higuchi’s
Classical Diffusion Equation)
4. Log of cumulative % release Vs log time (Peppas Exponential Equation)
8. Cubic root of unreleased fraction of drug verses time (Hixon Crowel)
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fig.1: Standard graph of Ritonavir pure drug
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) studies: When FT-IR was performed, the drug spectrum
indicated characteristic peaks at 3,480 cm−1
(N–H stretching amide group), 2,964 cm−1
(hydrogen-bonded acid
within the molecule), 1,716 cm−1
(ester linkage), 1,645, 1,622, and 1,522 cm−1
(–C═C– stretching aromatic
carbons). The FT-IR spectra of solid dispersion of Ritonavir prepared by solvent evaporation and melt method
was taken and analyzed. Two main band formations were observed between drug and carrier on the basis of FT-
IR spectra. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding was observed due to the peak at 3,380 cm−1
. A number of
indistinguishable peaks appeared in the region of 3,400–4,000 cm−1
in the solid dispersion which was absent in
the crystalline drug. A broad and strong absorption peak at 1,108 cm−1
indicated formation of secondary
hydrogen bond which was absent in pure drug. The presence of strong absorption peak at 1,735 cm−1
and
2,720 cm−1
were indicative of characteristic C–H stretching band and C═O stretching band of aliphatic
aldehydic group. This band was absent in the spectra of the crystalline drug. The hydrogen bonding and
aldehydic group formation between drug and carrier indicated interaction between the two, which could be
attributed to the cause of enhanced dissolution rate of the solid dispersion as compared to pure drug. In case of
melt method, both the aldehydic group and hydrogen bond peaks were present but were very broad as compared
to that obtained in solvent evaporation. The interaction between drug and carrier was due to hydrogen bond and
aldehydic linkages resulting in the increase solubility of drug.
Page 4
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 47 | P a g e
A)
7501500225037501/cm
25
50
75
100
%T
4696
.67
4669
.66
4660
.02
4631
.09
4609
.87
4592
.51
4575
.15
4559
.72
4548
.15
4511
.50
4494
.14
4461
.35
4395
.77
4334
.05
4312
.83
4270
.40
4233
.75
4200
.96
4168
.17
4146
.95
4131
.52
4058
.23
4044
.73
4025
.44
4010
.01
3975
.29
3950
.22
3919
.35
3903
.92
3853
.77
3840
.27
3820
.98
3801
.70
3780
.48
3770
.84
3751
.55
3736
.12
3724
.54
3711
.04
3689
.83
3649
.32
3612
.67
3566
.38
3545
.16
3358
.07
3331
.07
3099
.61 30
84.1
830
59.1
030
24.3
8 3003
.17
2964
.59
2951
.09 2922
.16
2904
.80
2887
.44
2870
.08
2821
.86
2756
.28 26
57.9
126
36.6
925
73.0
425
55.6
825
15.1
825
03.6
024
65.0
324
38.0
224
07.1
623
80.1
623
47.3
722
95.2
922
54.7
922
10.4
221
62.2
020
96.6
220
58.0
520
38.7
619
77.0
419
55.8
219
30.7
419
09.5
318
88.3
118
11.1
617
72.5
817
16.6
516
81.9
316
45.2
816
22.1
315
25.6
915
06.4
114
94.8
314
56.2
614
15.7
513
82.9
613
67.5
313
38.6
013
17.3
813
01.9
512
78.8
112
40.2
312
01.6
5 1188
.15
1155
.36
1134
.14
1122
.57
1093
.64
1078
.21
1053
.13
1022
.27 96
4.41
921.
9791
2.33
883.
4087
3.75
854.
4784
6.75
819.
7579
0.81
738.
7470
4.02
673.
1664
4.22
607.
5856
7.07
553.
57 538.
1451
4.99
491.
8548
0.28 45
7.13
R 0 B)
7501500225037501/cm
25
50
75
100
%T
4395
.77
4351
.41
4330
.19
4312
.83
4270
.40
4233
.75
4226
.04
4199
.03
4166
.24
4058
.23
4046
.66
4025
.44
3975
.29
3952
.14
3905
.85
3840
.27
3356
.14
3331
.07
3099
.61 30
86.1
130
61.0
330
24.3
830
03.1
729
64.5
929
51.0
929
33.7
329
24.0
929
02.8
728
87.4
428
70.0
828
41.1
528
21.8
627
58.2
126
57.9
125
74.9
725
55.6
825
15.1
825
05.5
324
38.0
224
07.1
623
78.2
323
47.3
723
14.5
822
93.3
622
52.8
622
02.7
121
62.2
020
94.6
920
58.0
520
36.8
319
78.9
719
55.8
219
30.7
419
09.5
318
86.3
818
11.1
617
72.5
817
16.6
516
80.0
016
45.2
816
20.2
115
25.6
914
92.9
014
56.2
614
13.8
213
82.9
613
67.5
313
36.6
713
01.9
512
78.8
112
40.2
312
01.6
5 1188
.15
1155
.36
1134
.14
1093
.64
1078
.21
1053
.13
1031
.92
1024
.20
964.
4195
2.84
927.
7691
2.33
883.
4087
1.82
854.
4784
6.75 81
9.75
790.
8173
8.74
704.
0267
5.09
644.
2260
7.58
582.
5056
7.07 53
6.21
514.
9949
3.78
480.
2845
7.13 44
3.63
R 1 C)
7501500225037501/cm
25
50
75
100
%T
4696
.67
4667
.73
4648
.45
4634
.94
4606
.01
4575
.15
4544
.29
4511
.50
4395
.77
4378
.41
4351
.41
4330
.19
4312
.83
4268
.47
4056
.30
4044
.73
4004
.22
3975
.29
3903
.92
3853
.77
3840
.27
3820
.98
3801
.70
3770
.84
3358
.07
3329
.14
3099
.61
3061
.03
3043
.67
3024
.38
3003
.17
2964
.59
2949
.16
2933
.73
2906
.73
2889
.37
2872
.01 28
37.2
927
60.1
425
57.6
1 2380
.16
2347
.37
2150
.63
2131
.34
2115
.91
2090
.84
2065
.76
2017
.54
1978
.97
1955
.82
1932
.67
1890
.24
1830
.45
1811
.16
1772
.58
1751
.36
1716
.65 16
45.2
816
22.1
315
25.6
914
92.9
014
56.2
614
46.6
114
17.6
813
86.8
213
67.5
313
36.6
713
01.9
512
78.8
112
40.2
312
01.6
511
88.1
511
55.3
611
34.1
410
78.2
110
53.1
310
29.9
9 1002
.98
964.
4194
5.12
937.
4091
0.40
883.
4086
9.90
854.
4779
0.81
752.
2473
8.74
704.
02 642.
3060
7.58
580.
57 528.
5051
6.92
497.
6348
0.28
455.
2044
1.70
424.
34
401.
19
R 2
Page 5
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 48 | P a g e
D)
7501500225037501/cm
40
60
80
%T
4681
.24
4660
.02
4607
.94
4577
.08
4559
.72
4550
.08
4536
.58
4509
.57
4393
.84
4330
.19 42
97.4
042
70.4
042
35.6
842
10.6
141
70.1
040
17.7
240
08.0
839
75.2
939
63.7
239
48.2
939
19.3
539
03.9
238
53.7
738
38.3
438
20.9
838
01.7
037
84.3
437
66.9
837
49.6
237
36.1
237
24.5
437
11.0
436
12.6
735
66.3
835
45.1
635
23.9
535
02.7
334
81.5
134
19.7
933
58.0
733
31.0
7 3236
.55
3153
.61
3134
.33
3099
.61
3086
.11
3061
.03
3024
.38
2947
.23
2883
.58
2837
.29
2740
.85
2711
.92
2694
.56
2609
.69
2576
.90
2513
.25
2439
.95
2409
.09
2382
.09
2347
.37
2241
.28
2202
.71
2164
.13
2096
.62
2029
.11
1967
.39
1944
.25 19
23.0
319
09.5
318
90.2
418
69.0
217
51.3
617
16.6
516
83.8
616
45.2
816
22.1
315
21.8
414
56.2
614
17.6
813
59.8
213
42.4
613
13.5
212
80.7
312
40.2
312
01.6
511
88.1
511
47.6
511
12.9
3 1060
.85 10
31.9
296
4.41 94
7.05
883.
4087
1.82
842.
8979
0.81
738.
7470
4.02 64
0.37
607.
5856
9.00
528.
5051
6.92
507.
2848
0.28 47
0.63
443.
63
424.
34
R 3 E)
7501500225037501/cm
40
60
80
%T
4660
.02
4631
.09
4606
.01
4555
.86
4542
.36
4509
.57
4334
.05
4280
.04
4235
.68
4170
.10
4125
.74
4004
.22
3977
.22
3963
.72
3917
.43
3905
.85
3840
.27
3822
.91
3801
.70
3770
.84
3736
.12
3726
.47
3689
.83
3630
.03
3358
.07
3331
.07
3199
.91
3099
.61
3084
.18
3059
.10
3024
.38
2947
.23
2883
.58
2823
.79
2806
.43 27
40.8
527
11.9
226
94.5
626
28.9
826
07.7
625
90.4
025
11.3
224
26.4
523
80.1
623
47.3
722
99.1
522
37.4
3 2202
.71
2166
.06
2098
.55
1959
.68
1911
.46
1890
.24
1811
.16
1762
.94
1751
.36
1716
.65 16
47.2
116
18.2
816
10.5
615
21.8
414
58.1
8 1411
.89
1359
.82
1342
.46
1280
.73
1242
.16
1201
.65
1188
.15
1145
.72
1120
.64
1060
.85 1031
.92
1001
.06
962.
4894
7.05
883.
4084
2.89
790.
8173
8.74
704.
0267
5.09
644.
2260
7.58
582.
5056
9.00
555.
5052
8.50 50
9.21 49
5.71
478.
3545
7.13
443.
6343
0.13
420.
48
R 4 F)
7501500225037501/cm
40
60
80
%T
4696
.67
4660
.02
4633
.02
4606
.01
4557
.79
4536
.58
4511
.50
4332
.12
4272
.33
4175
.89
4129
.60
4008
.08
3977
.22
3963
.72 39
25.1
439
03.9
238
53.7
738
40.2
738
20.9
838
01.7
037
86.2
737
70.8
437
26.4
737
12.9
736
89.8
335
23.9
534
21.7
233
58.0
733
32.9
930
99.6
130
86.1
130
59.1
030
24.3
829
47.2
328
81.6
528
27.6
428
21.8
628
04.5
0 2740
.85
2694
.56
2627
.05
2607
.76
2582
.68
2511
.32
2426
.45
2380
.16
2345
.44
2301
.08
2237
.43 22
02.7
121
66.0
620
98.5
519
61.6
119
11.4
618
90.2
418
11.1
617
72.5
817
51.3
617
16.6
516
80.0
016
47.2
116
18.2
815
21.8
414
58.1
814
11.8
913
59.8
213
42.4
612
80.7
312
42.1
612
01.6
511
88.1
511
45.7
211
11.0
010
60.8
510
31.9
296
2.48
947.
0588
3.40
842.
8979
0.81
765.
7473
8.74
704.
0267
3.16
663.
5164
4.22
599.
8658
2.50
569.
0055
5.50
530.
42 514.
9948
0.28
455.
20
R 5 Fig.2 : FT-IR Spectra of A) pure drug Ritonavir; B) Kneading 1:0.5 HP Beta CD;C) Kneading 1:3 Beta
CD;D) 1:3 Melting PEG 20,000; E) 1:4 Solvent evaporation PEG 20,000; F)1:4 Solvent evaporation PEG
4000
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): DSC studies of various solid dispersion of Ritonavir were taken. It
was concluded on the basis of scans that DSC of the sample prepared by the solvent method, kneading, physical
mixing and melt method showed absence of any significant drug peak at 120°C but presence of prominent peak
of carrier with no change in melting point. This suggested the formation of a monotectic system where the
melting point of the carrier is unchanged in the presence of drug. The results suggested formation of the eutectic
solid dispersion where the drug is present as ultrafine crystals in polymer matrix.
Page 6
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 49 | P a g e
A)
50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00
Temp [C]
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
mW
DSC
118.08 x100COnset
126.47 x100CEndset
122.95 x100CPeak
-438.12 x100mJ
-219.06 x100J/g
Heat
File Name: R 0.tad
Detector: DSC-60
Acquisition Date 12/11/09
Acquisition Time 11:50:35(+0530)
Lot No: RIPS0164
Sample Name: R 0
Sample Weight: 2.000[mg]
Cell: Aluminum
Operator: CIR,RIPS,Berhampur
Thermal Analysis Result-RIPS
B)
50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00
Temp [C]
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
mW
DSC
117.81 x100COnset
124.69 x100CEndset
121.40 x100CPeak
-197.87 x100mJ
-98.93 x100J/g
Heat
File Name: R 1.tad
Detector: DSC-60
Acquisition Date 12/11/09
Acquisition Time 10:59:55(+0530)
Lot No: RIPS0163
Sample Name: R 1
Sample Weight: 2.000[mg]
Cell: Aluminum
Operator: CIR,RIPS,Berhampur
[Temp Program]
Temp Rate Hold Temp Hold Time
[C/min ] [ C ] [ min ]
10.00 300.0 0
Thermal Analysis Result-RIPS
C)
100.00 200.00
Temp [C]
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
mW
DSC
100.58 x100COnset
121.56 x100CEndset
114.97 x100CPeak
-1.32 x100J
-660.28 x100J/g
Heat
File Name: R 2.tad
Detector: DSC-60
Acquisition Date 12/11/09
Acquisition Time 10:08:14(+0530)
Lot No: RIPS0162
Sample Name: R 2
Sample Weight: 2.000[mg]
Cell: Aluminum
Operator: CIR,RIPS,Berhampur
[Temp Program]
Temp Rate Hold Temp Hold Time
[C/min ] [ C ] [ min ]
10.00 300.0 0
Thermal Analysis Result-RIPS
D)
50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00
Temp [C]
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
mW
DSC
45.16 x100COnset
58.58 x100CEndset
53.57 x100CPeak
-678.32 x100mJ
-339.16 x100J/g
Heat120.36 x100COnset
135.96 x100CEndset
124.91 x100CPeak
-258.68 x100mJ
-129.34 x100J/g
Heat
File Name: R 3.tad
Detector: DSC-60
Acquisition Date 12/11/07
Acquisition Time 12:23:45(+0530)
Lot No: RIPS0159
Sample Name: R 3
Sample Weight: 2.000[mg]
Cell: Aluminum
Operator: CIR,RIPS,Berhampur
[Temp Program]
Temp Rate Hold Temp Hold Time
[C/min ] [ C ] [ min ]
10.00 200.0 0
Thermal Analysis Result-RIPS
E)
50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00
Temp [C]
-10.00
0.00
mW
DSC
50.92 x100COnset
65.52 x100CEndset
61.35 x100CPeak
-675.28 x100mJ
-337.64 x100J/g
Heat
164.08 x100COnset
192.20 x100CEndset
163.13 x100CPeak
-75.98 x100mJ
-37.99 x100J/g
Heat
File Name: R 4.tad
Detector: DSC-60
Acquisition Date 12/11/08
Acquisition Time 14:31:57(+0530)
Lot No: RIPS0160
Sample Name: R 4
Sample Weight: 2.000[mg]
Cell: Aluminum
Operator: CIR,RIPS,Berhampur
[Temp Program]
Temp Rate Hold Temp Hold Time
[C/min ] [ C ] [ min ]
10.00 300.0 0
Thermal Analysis Result-RIPS
Page 7
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 50 | P a g e
F)
100.00 200.00 300.00
Temp [C]
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
mW
DSC
49.98 x100COnset
62.48 x100CEndset
57.91 x100CPeak
-1.01 x100J
-502.68 x100J/g
Heat
151.01 x100COnset
162.40 x100CEndset
153.26 x100CPeak
-32.04 x100mJ
-16.02 x100J/g
Heat
File Name: R 5.tad
Detector: DSC-60
Acquisition Date 12/11/08
Acquisition Time 15:24:26(+0530)
Lot No: RIPS0161
Sample Name: R 5
Sample Weight: 2.000[mg]
Cell: Aluminum
Operator: CIR,RIPS,Berhampur
[Temp Program]
Temp Rate Hold Temp Hold Time
[C/min ] [ C ] [ min ]
10.00 300.0 0
Thermal Analysis Result-RIPS
Fig.3 : DSC thermograms of A) pure drug Ritonavir; B) Kneading 1:0.5 HP Beta CD;C) Kneading 1:3 Beta
CD;D) 1:3 Melting PEG 20,000; E) 1:4 Solvent evaporation PEG 20,000; F)1:4 Solvent evaporation PEG
4000
Phase solubility studies: Phase solubility diagrams showed a linear increase in drug solubility with an increase
in the concentration of each examined carrier. At 2%, 6% & 8% w/v concentration of β-CD, HP β-CD, and
PEGs, the solubility of Ritonavir increased significantly. Analogous results were found for these same carriers,
probably due to the formation of weakly soluble complexes. Hydrophilic carriers mainly interact with drug
molecules by electrostatic bonds (ion-to-ion, ion-to-dipole, and dipole-to-dipole bonds), even though other types
of forces, such as Vander Waals forces and hydrogen bonds, can frequently play a role in the drug–carrier
interaction .The drug solubility increased linearly with increasing polymer concentration. The values of Gibbs
free energy (ΔG) associated with the aqueous solubility of Ritonavir in presence of carrier were all negative for
carriers at various concentrations, the spontaneous nature of drug solubilization. The values decreased with
increasing carrier concentration, demonstrating that the reaction became more favorable as the concentration of
carrier increased.
In vitro dissolution studies: All formulations of Ritonavir were subjected to in vitro dissolution studies using
0.1N HCl as the dissolution medium to assess various dissolution properties. All SD formulations with various
polymers exhibited higher rates of dissolution than Ritonavir pure drug and corresponding physical mixtures.
The pure drug showed up to 48 % dissolution over 60 min, but its solid dispersions prepared by solvent
evaporation 1:4 w/w) showed dissolution of greater than 80% .Solid dispersions of β-CD and HP β-CD prepared
by kneading and physical mixture showed nearly similar dissolution. The dissolution enhancing effect of various
carriers used in this study followed the order: 20,000PEG>4000 PEG>8000PEG>6000 PEG and HP β-CD > β-
CD. Among various ratios of drug with PEG, ratio at 1:4 w/w solid dispersions prepared by solvent evaporation
technique showed better enhancement of solubility. Among various ratios of drug with HP β-CD at ratio 1:0.5
w/w inclusion complexes in the form of solid dispersions by kneading technique at room temperature exhibited
improved aqueous solubility leading to superior in vitro dissolution profile. Among various ratios of drug with
β-CD at ratio 1:3 w/w solid dispersions prepared by kneading technique at room temperature exhibited
improved aqueous solubility leading to superior in vitro dissolution profile. The dissolution rate enhancing
effect of various grades of PEG carriers used in this study followed the order 20,000
PEG>4000PEG>8000PEG>6000PEG. The solubility enhancing effect in the case of complex forming polymers
HP β-CD showed relatively higher dissolution enhancement in comparison with β-CD. The dissolution
enhancing effect of various SD preparation methods followed the order solvent evaporation technique>kneading
technique>melting technique>physical mixing technique. Experience with solid dispersions indicates that this is
a very fruitful approach to improve the release rate and oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. This could
potentially lead to an increase in the bioavailability that is so great that that the dose administered can be
lowered.
Pure drug dissolution profile:
Page 8
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 51 | P a g e
Fig. 4: In vitro dissolution profile of Pure drug
In vitro dissolution profile of formulations prepared by Physical Mixing:
Fig. 5: In vitro dissolution profile of PM1 (1:0.25), PM 2 (1:0.5), PM 3 (1:1) and PM 4 (1:2) containing PEG
4000 by Physical Mixing.
Fig. 6: In vitro dissolution profile of PM5 (1:0.25), PM 6 (1:0.5), PM 7 (1:1) and PM 8 (1:2) containing PEG
6000 by Physical Mixing.
Page 9
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 52 | P a g e
Fig. 7: In vitro dissolution profile of PM9 (1:0.25), PM 10 (1:0.5), PM 11 (1:1) and PM 12 (1:2) containing
PEG 8000 by Physical Mixing.
Fig. 8: In vitro dissolution profile of PM 13(1:0.25), PM 14 (1:0.5), PM 15 (1:1) and PM 16 (1:2) containing
PEG 20000 by Physical Mixing.
In vitro dissolution profile of formulations prepared by Solvent Evaporation:
Fig. 9: In vitro dissolution profile of SE1 (1:0.5), SE2 (1:1), SE3 (1:2), SE4 (1:3) and SE5 (1:4) containing PEG
4000 by Solvent Evaporation.
Page 10
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 53 | P a g e
Fig. 10: In vitro dissolution profile of SE 6(1:0.5),SE7 (1: 1), SE8 (1:2),SE 9 (1:3) and SE 10 (1:4) containing
PEG 6000 by Solvent Evaporation.
Fig. 11: In vitro dissolution profile of SE 11(1:0.5),SE12 (1: 1), SE13 (1:2),SE 14 (1:3) and SE 15 (1:4)
containing PEG 8000 by Solvent Evaporation
Fig. 12: In vitro dissolution profile of SE 16(1:0.5), SE17 (1: 1), SE18 (1:2), SE 19 (1:3) and SE 20 (1:4)
containing PEG 20000 by Solvent Evaporation.
Page 11
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 54 | P a g e
In vitro dissolution profile of formulations prepared by Melt Fusion:
Fig. 13: In vitro dissolution profile of MF1(1:3), MF2(1:3), MF3(1:3) and MF4(1:3) containing by PEG
4000,6000,8000 and 20000 respectively (Melt fusion technique).
In vitro dissolution profile of formulations prepared by Kneading Method:
Fig. 14: In vitro dissolution profile of KF1 (1:0.5), KF2(1:1), KF3(1:2) KF4(1:3) (Kneading Method)and KF5
(1:0.5-Physical Mixing method) containing by Beta cyclodextrins
Fig. 15: In vitro dissolution profile of KF6 (1:0.5), KF7 (1:1), KF8(1:2) KF9(1:3) (Kneading Method) and KF10
(1:3-Physical Mixing method) containing by Hydroxy propyl Beta cyclodextrins.
Page 12
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 55 | P a g e
Table 1: Drug content estimation of Ritonavir polymeric dispersions by various carriers
Formulations code Method % Drug Content ± SD
PM 1 Physical Mixing Technique 91.01 ± 1.34
PM2 Physical Mixing Technique 92.01 ± 1.29
PM3 Physical Mixing Technique 92.91 ± 1.32
PM4 Physical Mixing Technique 93.28 ± 1.01
PM5 Physical Mixing Technique 86.14 ± 1.09
PM6 Physical Mixing Technique 86.61 ± 1.91
PM7 Physical Mixing Technique 86.56 ± 1.89
PM8 Physical Mixing Technique 86.97 ± 1.70
PM9 Physical Mixing Technique 87.87 ± 1.34
PM10 Physical Mixing Technique 87.88 ± 1.70
PM11 Physical Mixing Technique 87.89 ± 1.65
PM12 Physical Mixing Technique 87.89 ± 1.99
PM13 Physical Mixing Technique 94.32 ± 1.42
PM14 Physical Mixing Technique 95.68 ± 1.23
PM15 Physical Mixing Technique 96.07 ± 1.23
PM16 Physical Mixing Technique 99.09 ± 1.98
MF1 Melt Technique 93.24 ± 1.94
MF2 Melt Technique 86.28 ± 1.87
MF3 Melt Technique 89.81 ± 1.43
MF4 Melt Technique 99.01 ± 2.11
SE1 Solvent Evaporation Technique 92.12 ± 1.77
SE2 Solvent Evaporation Technique 92.23 ± 1.01
SE3 Solvent Evaporation Technique 92.24 ± 1.23
SE4 Solvent Evaporation Technique 93.56 ± 1.65
SE5 Solvent Evaporation Technique 93.52 ± 1.98
SE6 Solvent Evaporation Technique 86.35 ± 1.96
SE7 Solvent Evaporation Technique 86.84 ± 1.21
SE8 Solvent Evaporation Technique 86.85 ± 1.31
SE9 Solvent Evaporation Technique 86.87 ± 1.67
SE10 Solvent Evaporation Technique 86.89 ± 1.42
SE11 Solvent Evaporation Technique 88.12 ± 2.42
SE12 Solvent Evaporation Technique 88.14 ± 2.43
SE13 Solvent Evaporation Technique 88.23 ± 1.99
SE14 Solvent Evaporation Technique 88.34 ± 2.90
SE15 Solvent Evaporation Technique 89.31 ± 1.89
SE16 Solvent Evaporation Technique 94.12 ± 1.94
SE17 Solvent Evaporation Technique 95.01 ± 1.86
SE18 Solvent Evaporation Technique 96.02 ± 1.89
SE19 Solvent Evaporation Technique 97.03 ± 1.01
SE20 Solvent Evaporation Technique 98.04 ± 1.02
Page 13
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 56 | P a g e
KF1 Kneading Method 96.42 ± 1.01
KF2 Kneading Method 96.26 ± 1.23
KF3 Kneading Method 96.91 ± 1.21
KF4 Kneading Method 97.13 ± 1.23
KF5 Physical Mixing Technique 95.42 ± 2.34
KF6 Kneading Method 90.92 ± 2.54
KF7 Kneading Method 91.12 ± 1.43
KF8 Kneading Method 92.16 ± 1.24
KF9 Kneading Method 91.34 ± 1.07
KF10 Physical Mixing Technique 93.88 ± 1.06
Table 2: Kinetics data for various polymeric dispersions
Formulations
code
Higuchi
Krosmeyer-Peppas model
Hixon
Crowell
First
order
Zero
order
R R K n R R R
PM1 0.997 0.974 25.70 0.069 0.994 0.994 0.993
PM2 0.978 0.985 26.66 0.065 0.945 0.946 0.942
PM3 0.972 0.923 27.16 0.070 0.997 0.997 0.997
PM4 0.895 0.835 25.50 0.128 0.946 0.944 0.951
PM5 0.968 0.926 11.22 0.117 0.980 0.980 0.979
PM6 0.928 0.868 11.48 0.116 0.972 0.972 0.973
PM7 0.906 0.861 10.37 0.160 0.952 0.951 0.954
PM8 0.965 0.960 3.53 0.467 0.993 0.922 0.996
PM9 0.897 0.832 9.74 0.156 0.955 0.954 0.956
PM10 0.970 0.933 12.35 0.129 0.993 0.993 0.994
PM11 0.939 0.910 12.50 0.178 0.968 0.966 0.970
PM12 0.958 0.962 6.19 0.386 0.928 0.930 0.923
PM13 0.913 0.912 10.81 0.153 0.913 0.913 0.913
PM14 0.970 0.994 12.82 0.143 0.919 0.920 0.915
PM15 0.965 0.936 14.02 0.175 0.986 0.985 0.987
PM16 0.956 0.928 17.10 0.194 0.960 0.962 0.957
MF1 0.955 0.905 34.43 0.135 0.985 0.982 0.991
MF2 0.946 0.982 33.34 0.123 0.982 0.979 0.987
MF3 0.973 0.929 37.15 0.113 0.992 0.992 0.992
MF4 0.993 0.972 40.27 0.123 0.994 0.995 0.989
SE1 0.982 0.957 27.03 0.137 0.982 0.983 0.979
SE2 0.951 0.890 48.97 0.083 0.985 0.982 0.990
SE3 0.968 0.921 49.09 0.093 0.985 0.985 0.985
SE4 0.949 0.887 52.23 0.082 0.982 0.980 0.983
SE5 0.961 0.990 55.08 0.093 0.924 0.934 0.900
SE6 0.994 0.984 25.31 0.290 0.991 0.993 0.985
SE7 0.978 0.997 46.77 0.087 0.942 0.947 0.929
SE8 0.939 0.896 46.77 0.095 0.962 0.956 0.972
Page 14
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 57 | P a g e
SE9 0.988 0.977 48.97 0.086 0.978 0.980 0.971
SE10 0.910 0.853 48.97 0.086 0.943 0.936 0.958
SE11 0.982 0.960 26.85 0.160 0.993 0.992 0.993
SE12 0.958 0.925 45.91 0.082 0.965 0.965 0.964
SE13 0.988 0.953 52.48 0.076 0.998 0.998 0.998
SE14 0.998 0.983 53.70 0.079 0.990 0.993 0.983
SE15 0.991 0.963 56.23 0.075 0.993 0.994 0.989
SE16 0.984 0.957 23.98 0.222 0.995 0.995 0.993
SE17 0.917 0.921 47.86 0.103 0.887 0.892 0.877
SE18 0.976 0.938 48.97 0.094 0.985 0.986 0.983
SE19 0.990 0.963 51.28 0.089 0.993 0.994 0.989
SE20 0.981 0.950 60.25 0.070 0.990 0.989 0.988
KF1 0.944 0.970 74.64 0.123 0.923 0.935 0.892
KF2 0.931 0.949 25.88 0.224 0.914 0.927 0.881
KF3 0.946 0.957 38.01 0.314 0.935 0.951 0.893
KF4 0.955 0.963 36.30 0.113 0.935 0.940 0.925
KF5 0.990 0.979 21.37 0.298 0.994 0.994 0.989
KF6 0.782 0.798 48.30 0.382 0.826 0.817 0.843
KF7 0.871 0.922 29.58 0.265 0.820 0.839 0.779
KF8 0.686 0.778 20.13 0.166 0.604 0.619 0.576
KF9 0.757 0.824 36.39 0.186 0.712 0.736 0.664
KF10 0.960 0.964 21.57 0.322 0.954 0.959 0.934
IV. CONCLUSION Although numerous methods are available to improve the solubility of pure drugs, the most
promising method for promoting dissolution is the formation o solid dispersions. The negative values of Gibbs
free energy of transfer from water to an aqueous solution of hydrophilic carriers indicated the spontaneity of
drug solubilization. Increased solubility was also observed with all types of hydrophilic carriers used in the
preparation of solid dispersions. Highest solubilizing power of HP β-CD and 20,000 grade of poly ethylene
glycol towards Ritonavir were shown by Phase solubility and dissolution studies. The solubility and dissolution
rate of ritonavir can be enhanced by the formulations of SDs of Ritonavir with Poly ethylene glycol 8000, Poly
ethylene glycol 4000, Poly ethylene glycol 6000 and β-CD. The solubilization effect of PEGs may be
contributed due to reduction of particle aggregation of the drug, absence of crystallinity , increased wettability,
dispersibility and alteration of the surface properties of the drug from its solid dispersion. Among the various
ratios, drug: PEG 20,000 and drug: HP β-CD showed satisfactory solubility enhancement. From FTIR
spectroscopy studies, it was concluded that there was no well defined chemical interactions between Ritonavir -
PEG 20,000 and Ritonavir-HP β-CD.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors are highly thankful to GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, GITAM University Visakhapatnam, India for
providing library facility during literature survey and also thankful to RIPS for conducting thermal analysis.
Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
[1] Shilpi.S, Mushir.A, Sanjula. B, A. Ahuja, Anil Kumar and Javed, 2011.Solid Dispersion as an
Approach for Bioavailability Enhancement of Poorly Water-Soluble Drug Ritonavir. AAPS Pharm
SciTech, 11(2):518-527.
[2] Lohithasu. D, Ramana J. V, Girish. P, I.N.S. Harsha, Madhu. G, Lavanya. K and Swathi. D, 2014. A
latest review on liquisolid technique as a novel Approach. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research,
3(4), 479-493.
Page 15
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of…
www.ijpsi.org 58 | P a g e
[3] Dannenfelser. R, He H, Joshi.Y, Bateman. S, Serajuddin.A.T.M.,2004. Development of clinical
dosage forms for a poorly water soluble drug I: Application of polyethylene glycol-polysorbate 80
solid dispersion carrier system. J Pharm Sci., 93:1165–75.
[4] Sushilkumar S. P., Shirish U. N. and Dinesh. K. S., 2011. Designing of Ritonavir Solid Dispersion
through Spray Drying. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 3 (5): 213-223.
[5] Nagesh. C, Shankaraiah M.M, Attimarad, S.L, Patil, A.M, Vijay kumar, 2013. Improving the
solubility and dissolution of Ritonavir by solid dispersion. Journal of Pharmaceutics and Scientific
Innovation, 2(4): 30-35.
[6] Md. Gulshan, S. Subhashini, M. Prathyusha and N. Rama Rao,2014. Dissolution rate enhancement
of Ritonavir by solid dispersion technique. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research,4(4):
2019-2026.
[7] D. Ravishanker, K. Vijaya sri, Ch. Ajay kumar, 2013.Formulation development of Ritonavir tablets
containing solid dispersions employing montmorillonite: dissolution rate enhancement. Asian J Pharm
Clin Res, 6(2):206-208.
[8] Chowdary K.P.R, Madhavi B.L.R.,2005. Novel drug delivery technologies for insoluble drugs. Indian
Drugs, 42(9):557-562.