Top Banner
Restricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved. Voting for Enhanced Security – How Far is Far Enough Roy Moxley, Siemens
18

Enhanced Power System Protection

Feb 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Vankurd

Enhanced Power System Protection
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Enhanced Power System Protection

Restricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved.

Voting for Enhanced Security – How Far is Far Enough

Roy Moxley, Siemens

Page 2: Enhanced Power System Protection

• About 1500 False trips

in 16 months (NERC)

• 16 Times more False

Trips than Failure to

Trip

• 41% of False trips are

during an external fault

Unpleasant Facts

Page 3: Enhanced Power System Protection

From NERC Report, Jan 2011 – April 2012

Page 4: Enhanced Power System Protection

From NERC Report, Jan 2011 – April 2012

Page 5: Enhanced Power System Protection

Restricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved.

Cost of Relays has come down an inflation adjusted 90% since 1980

Pleasant Fact

Page 6: Enhanced Power System Protection

Why Do We Apply Redundant Protection ?

It Costs More

Extra Engineering

Extra Maintenance

Extra Wiring

Page 7: Enhanced Power System Protection

Hole Filling

Page 8: Enhanced Power System Protection

So what Constitutes a Hole ?

Arc Resistance Coverage

Communication Failure Coverage

Power Swing Response

Fuse Failure (loss of potential) Response

It’s only a holeIf you hit it.

Page 9: Enhanced Power System Protection

Maintenance Backup

Page 10: Enhanced Power System Protection

Relay Failure Backup

Page 11: Enhanced Power System Protection

OR

A+B A+C B+C

Two of Three Logic Improves Dependability and Security

Let’s Define (A,C,B):1% chance of False Trip95% chance of Correct Trip

A+B = 1%2 = .01% Chance of False Trip(A+B)*(A+C)*(B+C)= 0.03% Chance of False Trip

A+B = 95%2 = 90.25% Chance of Correct Trip(A+B)*(A+C)*(B+C)= 99.9% Chance of Correct Trip

OR

AND AND AND

Page 12: Enhanced Power System Protection

Page 12

Implementing 2 of 3 is Not difficult

A

C

B C

B A

Details: On Loss of Relay, Revert to 1/2 or 2/2? Use Contacts or Logical Derivation? Use Same or Different Relays?

Page 13: Enhanced Power System Protection

What Does It Mean to be Different ?

Voting Must be Different to Count

Page 14: Enhanced Power System Protection

Human Error and Training Considerations

• Settings and Calculations

• Different Schemes

• Operations

• Maintenance

• Relay Out-of-Service

Page 15: Enhanced Power System Protection

Testing Changes

• Test of Relay Modifies

Scheme Logic

• Voting Logic is Part of

System Test

Page 16: Enhanced Power System Protection

Questions to Ask

How Many False Trips per Year are Acceptable?

What is the System Cost of a False Trip Coupled with a Correct Trip? Is This Condition Modeled

Page 17: Enhanced Power System Protection

Conclusions

• Two of Three Voting can Reduce False Trips Significantly

• Costs of Voting Schemes are 15% of Dual Schemes 35 Years Ago

Page 18: Enhanced Power System Protection

“Sometimes the questions are complicated and the

answers are simple”

Dr. Suess