Engineering of Biological Processes Lecture 5: Control of metabolism Mark Riley, Associate Professor Department of Ag and Biosystems Engineering The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 2007
Mar 29, 2015
Engineering of Biological Processes
Lecture 5: Control of metabolism
Mark Riley, Associate ProfessorDepartment of Ag and Biosystems
EngineeringThe University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
2007
Objectives: Lecture 5
• Understand how metabolism is controlled
• Model these reactions to shift carbon and resources down certain paths
Control of overall rate of metabolism
• Highly regulated process• Controlled by
– feedback mechanisms on enzymes– inhibited by products– stimulated by reactants– energy charge– oxygen concentration– environmental factors
• temperature, CO, some antibiotics
Metabolic processes are controlled by
• The flow of metabolism is determined primarily by the amount and activities of enzymes– substrate amounts have a smaller effect
• Covalent modification– regulatory enzymes are turned on or off by phosphorylation
(PO3)– small triggering signals have a large effect on overall rates
• Reversible reactions are potential control sites• Compartmentation
– glycolysis, fatty acid metabolism, and pentose phosphate pathway in cytosol
– fatty acid oxidation, citric acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation take place in mitochondria
Energy charge
[AMP][ADP][ATP]
[ADP]21
[ATP]chargeEnergy
High energy charge means the cell has a lot of energy
Low energy charge means the cell has little energy
Control pointsidentification of enzymes
• Enzymes – present at low enzymatic activity
• either low concentration or low intrinsic activity
– catalyze reactions that are not at equilibrium (under normal conditions)
– usually catalyze slow reactions (rate-determining)– often found at major branch points
• downstream end
– entryway into reaction that has the highest flux
Types of feedback control
1) Sequential feedback control
A → B → C
D → E → Y
F → G → Z
Inhibited by Y
Inhibited by Z
Types of feedback control
2) Enzyme multiplicity
A B → C
D → E → Y
F → G → Z
Inhibited by Y
Inhibited by Z
Inhibited by Z
Inhibited by Y
Types of feedback control
3) Concerted feedback control
A → B → C
D → E → Y
F → G → Z
Inhibited by Y
Inhibited by Z
Inhibited by Y+Z
Types of feedback control
4) Cumulative feedback control
A → B → C
D → E → Y
F → G → Z
Inhibited by Y
Inhibited by Z
Inhibited by Y or Z
Glucose Glucose 6-Phosphate
Fructose 6-Phosphate
Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphate
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate
Pyruvate
Acetate Acetyl CoA
Citrate
-Ketoglutarate
Succinate
Fumarate
Oxaloacetate
Phosphogluconate
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate
Acetaldehyde
2-Keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate
+Pyruvate
Lactate
Ethanol
Malate Isocitrate
CO2+NADHFADH2
CO2+NADH
NADH
NADH
GTP
GDP+Pi
Phosphoenolpyruvate
PFK = phosphofructokinase
Fructose 6-Phosphate + ATP Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphate + ADP + Pi
PFK = phosphofructokinase
Phosphofructokinase (PFK) allosteric enzyme activated by ADP and Pi, but inhibited by ATP.
When [ATP] is high, PFK is turned off, effectively shutting down glycolysis.
Allosteric = binding of one compound impacts the binding of other compounds
Michaelis-Menten kinetics do not readily apply
Pasteur effect
• Rate of glycolysis under anaerobic (low O2) conditions is higher then under aerobic (high O2).
• Carbohydrate consumption is 7x higher under anaerobic conditions.
• Caused by inhibition of PFK by citrate and ATP
Glucose Glucose 6-Phosphate
Fructose 6-Phosphate
Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphate
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate
Pyruvate
Acetate Acetyl CoA
Citrate
-Ketoglutarate
Succinate
Fumarate
Oxaloacetate
Phosphogluconate
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate
Acetaldehyde
2-Keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate
+Pyruvate
Lactate
Ethanol
MalateIsocitrate
CO2+NADHFADH2
CO2+NADH
NADH
NADH
GTP
GDP+Pi
Phosphoenolpyruvate
Pyruvate dehydrogenase
Pyruvate + NAD+ + CoA Acetyl CoA + CO2 + NADH
Pyruvate dehydrogenase
Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) assemblage of 3 enzymes that each catalyze one step in the overall reaction above.
PDH is inhibited by products (acetyl CoA, NADH), feedback regulation by nucleotides (ATP, GTP)reversible phosphorylation (a PO3- is added to a serine residue).
phosphorylation is enhanced by a high energy charge.
Activated by AMP, ADP, NAD+
Flux vs. activity
• Activity – how quickly one enzyme catalyzes one reaction
• Flux – overall rate of mass converted forward and reverse reaction
A B CE1
E2
E3
E4D
Amplification of control signals• Fluxes can be amplified, activities
cannot.
• Substrate cycles – separate enzymes catalyze forward vs. reverse reactions
A B CE1
E2
E3
E4 D
Flux
• Flux = rate of reaction
F = r = dC = vmax C
dt Km + C
Fluxtot = F2 – F3
A B CE1
E2
E3
E4
F2 = r2 = vmax2 B
Km2 + B
B to C
F3 = r3 = vmax3 C
Km3 + C
C to B
D
Amplification of control signals
PFK (phosphofructokinase) and
FBP (fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase)
Fructose 6-phosphate Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatePFK
FBP
ATPADP
Pi
Effect of AMP (adenosine monophosphate)
• Activity of PFK is increased by AMP• Activity of FBP is decreased by AMP
AMP concentration Fractional saturation (binding to PFK, FBP)
0 0
2.5 0.093
12.5 0.89
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
PFK
AMP
Enzyme activity as a function of bound AMP
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fraction of AMP bound
En
zym
e ac
tivi
ty m
M /
min PFK activity
FPB activity
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fraction of AMP bound
Net
flu
x m
M /
min
Net Flux
Effect of the substrate cycle
A 440-fold increase in flux (87.9 / 0.2)
results from
a 5-fold change in [AMP] (12.5 / 2.5).
This corresponds to 0.9 / 0.1 bound.
Design of an optimal catalyst
• Which pathways are active?
• Which is the slow step?
• Which steps are highly regulated?
• How do we funnel resources toward the desired product?
Steps in metabolic analyses• 1) Develop a model of metabolism
– Observe pathways– Measure flux through key reactions– Identify slow steps
• 2) Introduce perturbations– Alter enzyme activity
• Changing substrate• Vary concentrations of substrate• Other activators / inhibitors
– Determine fluxes after relaxation• New steady state
• 3) Analyze flux perturbation results– Are branches rigid? – Do changes in upstream flux impact split ratio or flux?
Basis of metabolic control
• Pacemaker Enzymes– Regulation is accomplished by altering the activity of at least one
pacemaker enzyme (or rate-determining step) of the pathway.
• Identification of a Pacemaker Enzyme– Normally it has a low activity overall, – Is subject to control by metabolites other than its substrates, – Often positioned as the first committed step of a pathway,
directly after major branch points, or at the last step of a “multi-input” pathway.
– Needs confirmation of the in vivo concentrations of the enzyme’s substrate(s) and product(s).
Identify slow steps
• For fast reactions, the concentration of substrates and products are essentially at equilibrium
• The role of “fast reactions” in control is low
Enzyme Relaxation time
Hexokinase 1100 sec
PFK 75 sec
DPGP 34,000 sec
Pyruvate kinase 28 sec
Lactate dehydrogenase
0.01 sec
Change enzymes
• Inhibit (destroy) a native enzyme– Knockout
• Enhance the concentration of a native enzyme
• Introduce a new enzyme– Different species– Used to permit utilization of new substrates
• C sources (5-ring sugars vs. 6-ring sugars)
Apparent Km values and their effect
P1 P2
I
S
Flux1 Flux2
Fluxtot
Fluxtot = F1 + F2
Flux1 = r1 = vmax1 S
Km1 + S
Flux2 = r2 = vmax2 S
Km2 + S
To funnel substrate through branch 1, do we want:
Km1 < Km2
or,
Km1 > Km2 ???
Some definitions
Ftot = vmax1 S
Km1 + S
+ vmax2 S
Km2 + S
Total flux
Selectivity
F1
F2 vmax2 S
Km2 + S
vmax1 S
Km1 + S=
Selectivity
SK
SK
vmax
vmax
r
r
m1
m2
2
1
2
1
So, to enhance r1, we want a small value of Km1
These two curves have the same vmax, but their Km values
differ by a factor of 2.
0
5
10
15
20
0 10 20 30 40 50
[S]
r
Low Km High Km
r1 = vmax1 S
Km1 + S
Low Km will be the path with the higher flux (all other factorsbeing equal).
Low Km also means a strong interaction between substrate and enzyme.
Michaelis Menten kinetics