Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Engagement Team - Group Audits Independence Sylvie Soulier, Task Force Chair Agenda Item 7 IESBA Board Meeting Virtual June 8- 15 2020 1 Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Engagement Team - Group Audits Independence
Sylvie Soulier, Task Force Chair
Agenda Item7
IESBA Board Meeting
Virtual
June 8- 15 2020
1
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 2 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Objectives of the Session
To discuss the Task Force’s observations based on its information gathering to date
To provide feedback on the Task Force’s preliminary views, proposed approach to addressing the relevant issues, and other identified matters
2
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 3 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Agenda of the Session
BACKGROUND DEFINITION OF ENGAGEMENT
TEAM
INDEPENDENCE FOR COMPONENT AUDITORS IN THE
CONTEXT OF GROUP AUDIT
FURTHER MATTERS TO
BE ADDRESSED
TASK FORCE NEXT STEPS
3
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 4 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
• To align the definition of the term “engagement team” in the Code with the revised definition of the same term in proposed ISA 220 (Revised) – To consider independence provisions that should apply to
those individuals
• Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit (ISA 600 (Revised))– Focus is on audits of f/s and auditor independence (i.e., Part 4A)
• Implications for Part 4B to be considered and addressed
Background
Project Objective, Focus and Scope
4
2nd bullet: It is referring to both network and non‐network Component Auditors in Group Audit
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 5 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Definition of Engagement Team (Extant Code versus Proposed ISA 220 (Revised))
Page 5
Extant Code Proposed ISA 220 (Revised)All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any individuals engaged by the firm or a network firm who perform assurance procedures on the engagement. This excludes external experts engaged by the firm or by a network firm.
The term “engagement team” also excludes individuals within the client’s internal audit function who provide direct assistance on an audit engagement when the external auditor complies with the requirements of ISA 610 (Revised 2013), Using the Work of Internal Auditors.
All partners and staff performing the audit engagement, and any other individuals who perform audit procedures on the engagement, excluding an auditor’s external expert engaged by the firm or a network firm, and internal auditors who provide direct assistance on an engagement. (Ref: Para. A16–A25)
A18 Engagement teams include individuals from the firm who perform audit procedures and may include individuals who perform audit procedures from:
a) A network firm
b) A firm that is not a network firm
c) A service provider.
For example, an individual from a network firm or from a firm that is not a network firm, may perform audit procedures on the financial information of a component in a group audit engagement, attend a physical inventory count or inspect physical fixed assets at a remote location.
The definition of ET is from the extant Code is based on extant ISA 220:
All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any individuals engaged by the firm or a network firm who perform audit procedures on the engagement. This excludes an auditor’s external expert engaged by the firm or a network firm.
In the extant Code, we introduced the terms “assurance procedures” rather than referring to audit procedures. In the revised definition, it specifically refers to audit engagements performing the audit procedures.
5
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 6 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Observations on the Extant Code
Definition of Engagement Team
The IIS are written to address standalone engagements only:
o The extant Code’s definition of ET is based on extant ISA 220, but applies to both audit and assurance engagements
– ISA 220 applies only to audit engagements
– Refers to single engagement (audit or assurance), defines the “Audit Client” which includes Related Entities (R400.20)
o The extant Code definition is silent on independence of individuals that are not engaged by the firm or network firm (e.g. non-network component auditors)
o Changing the definition of ET affects other definitions - “audit team” and “assurance team”
o The extant Code also refers to “Engagement Team” for non-assurance engagements (e.g. Conflicts of Interest)
6
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 7 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Task Force’s Preliminary Thinking – Alignment of Defined Terms
Page 7
Engagement Teams
Audit Engagement
Team
Assurance Engagement
Team
Proposed Definition:As defined in Proposed ISA 220
Applicability:Specific to audit engagementsReferred to in the Code in Part 3 and Part 4A
Proposed Definition:As per existing term defined in Extant Code for “Engagement Team”
Applicability:Specific to assurance engagements
Proposed Definition and Applicability:New term applicable to all types of engagements
Definition of Engagement Team
Definition of ET in extant Code:
All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any individuals engaged by the firm or a network firm who perform assurance procedures on the engagement. This excludes external experts engaged by the firm or by a network firm.
The term “engagement team” also excludes individuals within the client’s internal audit function who provide direct assistance on an audit engagement when the external auditor complies with the requirements of ISA 610 (Revised 2013), Using the Work of Internal Auditors.
7
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 8 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Matters for IESBA Consideration: Alignment of Defined Terms
Views on, or reactions to, the Task Force’s preliminary thinking
Whether members has any other comments
8
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 9 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Independence provisions for ET in extant Code
Definition of Engagement Team
Applies to Related Entities (applicable to Listed/Non-listed)
Applies to Related Entities (applicable to Listed/Non-listed)
Financial InterestsFinancial Interests
Para R510.6 extends beyond Related Entities for Non-Listed
Para R510.6 extends beyond Related Entities for Non-Listed
Loans and GuaranteesLoans and Guarantees
Business Relationships
Business Relationships
Family and Personal
Relationships
Family and Personal
Relationships
Recent Services with an Audit
Client
Recent Services with an Audit
Client
Employment with an Audit
Client
Employment with an Audit
Client
The above are looking at threats and safeguards that is in the extant Code
Question for consideration: Do we intend to apply the same requirements to ET member both inside and outside the network?
9
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 10 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Independence provisions for new members of ET (Revised Definition)
Definition of Engagement Team
ET members from network and non-network CA and
service provider
If non network ET member only works at the component level, from which related entities should that individual be independent?
Under the Conceptual Framework, does it make sense to apply same provisions for
network and non-network firm ET members?
Question for consideration: Do we intend to apply the same requirements to ET member both inside and outside the network?
10
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 11 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Related Entity Definition
Definition of Engagement Team
An entity that has any of the following relationships with the client:
a) An entity that has direct or indirect control over the client if the client is material to such entity;
b) An entity with a direct financial interest in the client if that entity has significant influence over the client and the interest in the client is material to such entity;
c) An entity over which the client has direct or indirect control;
d) An entity in which the client, or an entity related to the client under (c) above, has a direct financial interest that gives it significant influence over such entity and the interest is material to the client and its related entity in (c); and
e) An entity which is under common control with the client (a “sister entity”) if the sister entity and the client are both material to the entity that controls both the client and sister entity.
Financial Interests in an Entity Controlling an Audit Client
R510.6 When an entity has a controlling interest in an audit client and the client is material to the entity, neither the firm, nor a network firm, nor an audit team member, nor any of that individual’s immediate family shall hold a direct or material indirect financial interest in that entity.
11
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 12 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Key:
Independence Requirements
R510.6
Reason to * believe – apply
CF
Applicable Independence Provisions for Non-listed(Extant Code)
Definition of Engagement Team
E*(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Subsidiary)
B is material to A
C(Subsidiary)
C is not material to A
D*(Investee)
D is material to A
AAudit Client
G*(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to E
F*(Investor)
A is material F
Significant Influence
This slide explains the team which has to be independent in the the audit of A which is a non‐listed entity:
A Is the audit client so the independence requirements applies
B Controlled subsidiary to A so the independence requirements applies
C Not material to A though the independence requirements applies
D A has significant influence on D
E Ultimate parent of which A is material to E hence requirements from R510.6 applies
F F has financial interest in A as investor and A is material to F
G G is material to E
For D,E,F,G, if the above scenario holds true, then apply the CF
12
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 13 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Key:
Independence Requirements
Applicable Independence Provisions for Listed(Extant Code)
Definition of Engagement Team
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Subsidiary)
B is material to A
C(Subsidiary)
C is not material to A
D(Investee)
D is material to A
AAudit Client
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to E
F(Investor)
A is material F
Significant Influence
This slide explains the team which has to be independent in the audit of A which is a listed entity – so independence requirements applies to all
13
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 14 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Task Force Preliminary Views – Component Auditors (Network and Non-Network)
CAs from the same Network
(Individuals)
• Same independence requirements
applicable to the Group Team applies to
individuals of CA from same network
CAs from Non-Network
(Individuals)
• Must be independent of the component and the entities downstream
• If Component is material to Group Parent, then the independence requirements will extend up those entities
Concept of Component is not based on its legal provisions or structure
Definition of Engagement Team
14
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 15 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Non-Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component - Network)
B is material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Non-Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant InfluenceKey:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Do we apply CF?
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is MATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)
‐ As B is audited by component auditor within the network, the CF applies to the individuals auditing A
Proposal:
As C is controlled entity for A, should we apply the CF to individuals auditing C?
15
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 16 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Non-Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component - Network)
B is not material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Non-Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant Influence
Key:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Do we apply CF?
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is IMMATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)
‐ B is audited by component auditor within the network
Proposal:
‐ As B is an immaterial entity (to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)) audited by component auditor within the network, should the CF apply to the individuals auditing A?
‐ As C is controlled entity for A, should we apply the CF to individuals auditing C?
16
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 17 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Non-Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component – Non Network)
B is material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Non-Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant InfluenceKey:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is MATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)
‐ B is audited by component auditor outside of the network, so the CF applies to the individuals auditing A
17
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 18 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Non-Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component – Non Network)
B is not material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Non-Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant InfluenceKey:
Independence Requirements
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is IMMATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)
‐ B is audited by component auditor outside of the network
‐ B is not material to A and audited by component auditor outside of the network so no other provisions apply
18
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 19 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component - Network)
B is material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant Influence
Key:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Do we apply CF?
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is MATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Listed)
‐ As B is material and audited by component auditor within the network, CF is applied upstream (A and E)
Proposal:
‐ As it is a material entity (to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)) audited by component auditor within the network, should the CF apply to the individuals auditing the related entities within the Group (C, D, F and G)?
19
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 20 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component - Network)
B is not material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant Influence
Key:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Do we apply CF?
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is IMMATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Listed)
‐ B is audited by component auditor within the network
Proposal:
‐ As it is an immaterial entity (to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)) audited by component auditor within the network, should the CF apply to the individuals auditing the related entities within the Group (A, C, D, E, F and G)?
20
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 21 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component - Non Network)
B is material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
E is material to A
A(Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant InfluenceKey:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Do we apply CF?
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is MATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Listed)
‐ B is audited by component auditor outside the network
Proposal:
‐ As it is a material entity (to A, the Group Audit Client (Non‐Listed)) audited by component auditor outside of the network, should the CF apply to the individuals auditing the related entities upstream (A and E)?
21
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 22 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Listed Group: Component Team Independence (Task Force Preliminary Views)
E(Ultimate Parent)
A is material to E
B(Component - Non Network)
B is not material to A
C(Controlled)
D(Significant Influence)
D is material to A
A(Listed)
Group Audit Client
F(Investor)
A is material F
G(G is sister entity to A)
G is material to A
Controlled
Significant InfluenceKey:
Independence Requirements
Apply CF
Do we apply CF?
Definition of Engagement Team
B is the entity in focus:
‐ so the independence requirements applies to individuals auditing B
‐ B is IMMATERIAL to A, the Group Audit Client (Listed)
‐ B is audited by component auditor outside the network
‐ B is immaterial to A and audited by component auditor outside of the network so no other provisions apply
22
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 23 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Matters for IESBA Consideration:Key Principles: Independence for Component ET
Views on, or reactions to, the Task Force’s preliminary thinking
Whether members has any other comments
23
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 24 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
ISA 600 (Revised) Group Audit and Component Auditor
Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit
Definition of CA
An auditor who, at the request of the group engagement team, performs audit procedures related to a component for purposes of the group audit. A component auditor is a part of the engagement team. (Ref: Para. A13–A14)
A13. References in this ISA to the engagement team include members of the group engagement team and component auditors. The engagement team includes individuals from the group engagement team’s firm and may include individuals from a network firm, a firm that is not a network firm, or an external service provider.
A14. In some circumstances, the group engagement team may perform centralized testing on classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, or may perform audit procedures related to a component. In these circumstances, the group engagement team is not considered a component auditor for purposes of this ISA.
A4. …For this purpose, the group engagement team uses professional judgment in determining the components for which audit procedures will be performed (by the group engagement team or component auditors on its behalf). The manner in which components are viewed for purposes of planning and performing a group audit may be influenced by the group structure, but may or may not be aligned with the way in which the group is organized, which could be, for example, by legal entities, geographic locations, or lines of business.
A5. For example, for a group comprised of 15 legal entities that are required to be consolidated under the provisions of the applicable financial reporting framework (i.e., group financial statements), the auditor may plan and perform the group audit by combining these 15 entities into three components based on the commonality of information systems and systems of internal control.
Due to the proposed revisions in ISA 600 ED (and expanded definition of ET as per ISA 220 (Revised), how a group engagement team is structured have changed:
‐ The ET in ISA 600 now comprises the Group ET AND Component Auditors, which includes individuals from the network and non‐network and service providers.
‐ CAs may or may not be structured/organized via the legal form, rather based on facts and circumstances that Group Auditor deem appropriate for the purposes of Group FS.
24
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 25 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Non-Network Component Auditor – Group Audit
Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit
What are the RER including the independence requirements mean for the non network component auditor in a Group audit?
Establish the linkage between Related Entity and component
Minimum independence requirement in all situations?
Application of the Code where the Group is PIE and component is non-PIE?
25
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 26 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
1: Establish the linkage between Related Entity and component
Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit
A(Ultimate Parent)
Group Audit Client
Controlled Sub 1
Not material to A
Controlled Sub 2
Material to A
BranchBranch of Controlled Sub 2
Controlled Sub 3
Material to A
Equity Accounted Investee
Key:
Component 1
Component 2
Component 3
Entities below the parent company may not be organized based on its legal structure for the purposes of the Group Audit
ISA 600 (Revised) Application Material:
A4. …For this purpose, the group engagement team uses professional judgment in determining the components for which audit procedures will be performed (by the group engagement team or component auditors on its behalf). The manner in which components are viewed for purposes of planning and performing a group audit may be influenced by the group structure, but may or may not be aligned with the way in which the group is organized, which could be, for example, by legal entities, geographic locations, or lines of business.
A5. For example, for a group comprised of 15 legal entities that are required to be consolidated under the provisions of the applicable financial reporting framework (i.e., group financial statements), the auditor may plan and perform the group audit by combining these 15 entities into three components based on the commonality of information systems and systems of internal control.
26
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 27 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
2: Minimum independence requirement in all situationsTask Force Preliminary Views
Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit
Must be independent of the component and the entities downstream
- Task Force deliberating: upstream entities (e.g. controlled, materiality, significant influence)?
Independence requirements applicable to non-network ET also applies to the component firm and its network firms
Individuals in part (b) definition of audit team for the Group audit do not include individuals from component audit firm
Definition of audit team:
(a) All members of the engagement team for the audit engagement;
(b) All others within a firm who can directly influence the outcome of the auditengagement, including:
(i) Those who recommend the compensation of, or who provide directsupervisory, management or other oversight of the engagement partner inconnection with the performance of the audit engagement, including those atall successively senior levels above the engagement partner through to theindividual who is the firm’s Senior or Managing Partner (Chief Executive orequivalent);
(ii) Those who provide consultation regarding technical or industry‐specific issues,transactions or events for the engagement; and
(iii) Those who provide quality control for the engagement, including those whoperform the engagement quality control review for the engagement;
and
(c) All those within a network firm who can directly influence the outcome of the auditengagement.
27
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 28 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
3: Application of the Code where the Group is PIE and component is non-PIE
Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit
PIE/Non-PIEo The Group entity is a public interest entity (PIE) but a component is not, and that component is
audited by a non-network firm
o Whether the component auditor should follow the independence requirements that apply to PIEs or non-PIEs
o When there is a breach of independence at a component auditor and how it was remediated if the group auditor still intends to rely on the component auditor’s work
28
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 29 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
3: Task Force Preliminary Views
Independence for component auditors in the context of Group Audit
Group Non-PIENon-PIE IESBA
requirements for purposes of Group audit.
If component is a PIE, relevant independence
requirements (e.g. PIE) still apply for the statutory audit
of the component
Group PIE
- PIE IESBA requirements apply to entities included in
component and their controlled entities
- CF for all other related entities of the entities
included in the component
Component PIE
ComponentNon-PIE
ComponentNon-PIE
Component PIE
29
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 30 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Matters for IESBA Consideration:Key Principles: Non-Network Component Auditor – Group Audit
Views on, or reactions to, the matters presented
Whether members has any other comments
30
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 31 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Further matters to be addressed
• Breaches
o Review breaches provisions when there is a breach of independence at a non-network component auditor (ET or firm/network firm)
• Provisions in Part 4B
o Conforming amendments as a result of amendments to defined terms
o Confirmation if there are circumstances which impact assurance engagements
31
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 32 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
Matters for IESBA Consideration:Further matters to be addressed
Views on, or reactions to, the matters presented
Whether members has any other comments
32
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 33 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
• Continue developing the key principles identified during this presentation
• Continuing coordination with ISA 220 and ISA 600 Task Forces
• Seek engagement with various stakeholders:
Regulators and audit oversight bodies (e.g. IFIAR)
IESBA CAG (September 2020)
National Standard Setters
Forum of Firms
Small and Medium Practices (July 2020)
Professional Accounting Organizations in major jurisdictions
Task Force Next Steps
Q3 and Q4 Activities
33
Wednesday June 10, 2020
Page 34 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information
• Webinar covering the recently released ED of Proposed ISA 600 (Revised), Special Considerations—Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors).
• The webinar is scheduled for Thursday, June 11, 2020 from 8:00 am EDT.
• Len Jui, IAASB Member and Chair of the ISA 600 Task Force, will explain the background of the project and the key proposed revisions to ISA 600 (Revised).
• A follow-up webinar will be held in August 2020.
• This webinar will be recorded and placed on the IAASB Website at a later date.
Register here:
https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_eOqCWTCoSFeydDHlkTCWjQ
Appendix
IAASB WEBINAR ON THE PROPOSED ISA 600 ED
34
Wednesday June 10, 2020
The Ethics Board
www.ethicsboard.org
35
Wednesday June 10, 2020