Electricity storage in GB and the value of electricity storage Anthony Price Swanbarton The Electricity Storage Network
May 26, 2015
Electricity storage in GB and the value of electricity storage
Anthony Price
Swanbarton
The Electricity Storage Network
Energy policy
Classification of electricity storage by technology
Type
Mechanical / kinetic
Pumped hydro
Flywheels
Thermodynamic Compressed air
Cryogenic storage
Heat engines
Electrical Capacitors SMES
Batteries
Lead acid NiCd Lithium High temperature
Flow Batteries
Hydrogen / electrolyser
Electrolyser / fuel cell
Electrolyser / ICE
H2 / organic cycle
Thermal
Pumped heat, heat engines
Molten salt Ice Ceramics
Development status of storage technologies
kW 100 kW MW 10 MW 100 MW
Superconducting
Batteries ( lead acid, NiCd )
Pumped hydro
Sto
rage
tec
hn
olo
gies
Dev
elo
ped
Compressed air
Micro CAES
Hydrogen storage
NaS
Power rating
Note: the width of the bar indicates storage capacity
Li - ion
Cryogenics
2013 © Swanbarton Limited E&EO
UK projects
LCNF projects Location Installation Power Capacity Type Application
Hemsby April 2011 200 kW 200 kWh Li Wind
Chalvey June 2012 3 *25 kW 3*25 kWh Li Community
Orkney June 2013 2 MW 500 kWh Li Storage Park
Bristol Sept 2013 6 kW 14.4 kWh Lead acid
Darlington (NPG) Nov 2013 2.5 MW 5 MWh Li Voltage control and peak shifting
Darlington Nov 2013 100 kW 200 kWh Li Distribution support
Wooler Nov 2013 100 kW 200 kWh Li Distribution support
Wooler Nov 2013 50 kW 100 kWh Li LV control
Maltby Nov 2013 50 kW 100 kWh Li LV control
Darlington Nov 2013 50 kW 100 kWh Li Smart Grid Demo
Bristol Under constr 90 kW 321 kWh NaNiCl
Shetland Under constr 1 MW 3 MWh Lead acid Power station modulation
Milton Keynes Under constr 150 kW 450 kWh Peak demand reduction
Leighton Buzzard
Under constr 6 MW 10 MWh Li Local constraint management
Willenhall Planned 2 MW 375 kWh
Other projects Location Installation Power Capacity Type Application
Slough Constr 350 kW 2.4 MWh Cryogenic Demonstration
North Wales Planned 50 MW Pumped hydro Energy management
Antrim Planned 268 MW Compressed air Energy management
West Midlands Committed 1.5 MW 6 MWh Pumped heat Wind constraint management
Gaia, Scotland Committed 1.26 MWh Vanadium Flow
Moixa Committed 525 kWh Lithium, aqueous ion
Domestic distributed
Power networks
Today’s network
• Large scale generation, through transmission, distribution to users
• Limited embedded generation (at distribution level)
• Wholesale market supplies retail customers
• Limited number of self suppliers • System planned to meet peak
demand plus reserves – spare (or under utilised assets)
• Low level of interconnections to other systems
• Regulated wires businesses • Facing substantial change
The future • Significant shift from dispatchable
generation to time variable generation • More negative prices for electricity and
increased market volatility • Peaky demands from digital society,
switch to heat pumps, uncertain effect of electric vehicles
• Distributed community and domestic level generation and trading
• Average and peak domestic demand likely to increase (double??)
• Balancing the system requires more flexibility
• Even more government interference?
Reserve and Operating Margin Reserve requirement under ‘Gone Green’
Short Term Operating Reserve Requirement for average wind and low
wind conditions
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
20
10
/11
20
11
/12
20
12
/13
20
13
/14
20
14
/15
20
15
/16
20
16
/17
20
17
/18
20
18
/19
20
19
/20
20
20
/21
20
21
/22
20
22
/23
20
23
/24
20
24
/25
20
25
/26
20
26
/27
20
27
/28
20
28
/29
20
29
/30
20
30
/31
Year
ST
OR
R (
MW
)
Short Term Operating Reserve Requirement (4 hr) with average wind
Short Term Operating Reserve Requirement (4hr) with zero windlow wind
Source: National Grid
The four tools for system balancing
Flexible
generation
Storage
(absorbs and
rejects power)
Interconnectors (and new T & D )
Demand side
response
Does storage offer a solution?
Storage
• Rapid response
• Absorbs and rejects power
• Many options for location
• Rapid construction time
• Possible to match power and energy to requirement
• Multi purpose – unlikely to become a stranded asset
Issues
• No clear business model
• Power industry separation disincentives investment
• Uncertain income projections increases project financing risk
• No clear regulatory or licensing policy
• No current government policy for widespread deployment / adoption of storage
Combination of value
Time-shift
Ancillary services
Network management
£ /
kW
/ye
ar
20 - 50
50 -100
20 - 175
Power quality
Values are indicative and not necessarily additative
Policy requirements
• Clarify position of storage: New classification needed
• Set target for storage requirement: 2 GW by 2020 • Support storage: parity with support for other
new / green technologies + provide certainty of income
• Support mechanism specifically for storage: capacity market class based on capability
• Extend capital grants for deployment of storage: Develop projects to encourage the sector
Summary of key points
• GB system: current pumped storage = 3GW
• Insufficient peak capacity
• Reserve capacity needed
• Storage = suitable technology
• Current business model needs to be improved
• Policy changes needed – New classification for storage
– Government policy to adopt storage
• Consultancy specialising in the commercialisation of electrical energy storage systems
• Clients from North America, Europe and Asia
• Organiser of the International Flow Battery Forum
• Cenelec workshop agreement on flow batteries
• Founder of the Electricity Storage Network
• Member of the ESA
Contact details:
Anthony Price [email protected]
+44 1666 840948
www.electricitystorage.co.uk