Top Banner
KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular- Based M2M Communications Amin Azari and Guowang Miao KTH Royal Institute of Technology GlobalSIP Conference, 2014, Atlanta, USA
29
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

KTH ROYAL INSTITUTEOF TECHNOLOGY

Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-BasedM2M Communications

Amin Azari and Guowang Miao

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

GlobalSIP Conference, 2014, Atlanta, USA

Page 2: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 2

Contents:

• Introduction• System model and problem formulation• Proposed MAC design• Simulation Results• Conclusion

Page 3: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 3

Motivation

Future wireless access (5G) • Key challenges

• Continued traffic growth in terms of volume• Continued traffic growth in terms of number of devices• Spectral & Enrgy efficient system design

Page 4: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 4

M2M communication

• M2M communications: Communication of smart devices without human intervention.

• Some characteristics:• Large number of short-lived sessions• (usually) low-payload• Vastly diverse characteristics (e.g. battery capacity)• Vastly diverse QoS requirements (e.g. delay)

Page 5: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 5

M2M Communication Enablers

ReliabilityA

vaila

bilit

y

Cellular-based M2M

Proprietary Cellular

Low-power WLAN

Zigbee-like

Low-power Bluetooth

• Reliability = resilience to interference, throughput and outage guarantees

Reference: GREEN NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES FOR MTC IN 5G, Jesus Alonso-Zarate, EIT/ICT Summer school presentation

• Availability = coverage, roaming, mobility

CoverageMobility & RoamingInterference ControlEnergy Efficiency ?

Page 6: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 6

Contents:

• Introduction• System model and problem formulation• Proposed MAC design• Simulation Results• Conclusion

Page 7: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 7

System model

• Single Cell• N machine nodes

• Battery-driven nodes• Long battery-life is desired

• Specific resource allocation for M2M (no cellular user)• Event-driven traffic (Poisson packet arrival)

Page 8: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 8

Problem formulation

• Clustering design• Complete, partial or no-clustering? • Number of clusters• Cluster-head selection & reselection

• Communication Protocol• Intra-cluster communication protocol• Inter-cluster communication protocol

Page 9: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 9

Problem formulation

• Clustering design• Presented in

Energy-Efficient Clustering Design for M2M Communications,

G. Miao and P. Zhang, GlobalSIP 2014

• Communication protocol design• In this work

Page 10: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 10

Contents:

• Introduction• System model and problem formulation• Proposed MAC design

• Clustering for cellular-based M2M• Intra-cluster communication• Inter-cluster communication

• Simulation Results• Conclusion

Page 11: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 11

Proposed MAC design: Clustering

• Clustering• Given desired receive SNR• Calculate transmission power at ith node,

• If – node i is to be clustered

• In each cluster the node with the lowest will be CH.

Page 12: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 12

Proposed MAC design: Intra-cluster Communication

• Intra-cluster communication• Low traffic load

• CSMA/CA has good performance in low-load regime• Scalable, low signaling overhead, and acceptable EE

• The EE, delay, and user capacity analysis:

Details

Page 13: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 13

Proposed MAC design: Multi-Phase CSMA

• Even more energy efficiency• Multi-phase CSMA for intra-cluster communication • Enables close-to-zero power wastage• Needs local synchronization (tradeoff)

Analytical performance evaluation is presented to verify performance improvment.

Page 14: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 14

Proposed MAC design: Inter-cluster

• Inter-cluster communication• Heterogeneous system

• Length of data packet (CH and CM)• State: delay critical, queue status and residual energy

• Interference to the cellular users must be avoided.

THEN• Reservation-based protocols (e.g. dynamic TDMA)• Moderate scalability and energy-saving

• Analytical results are omitted from the paper due to the page limit.

Page 15: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 15

Proposed MAC: Communication frame

Inter-clusterIntra-cluster

Multi-phase CSMA

Reservation

Notification

Transmission

Notification

Page 16: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 16

Contents:

• Introduction• System model and problem formulation• Proposed MAC design• Simulation Results• Conclusion

Page 17: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 17

Simulation Results: System Model

• Single cell with LTE base station• Uplink transmission of battery-driven machine nodes• 4-phase CSMA for intra-cluster communication• Dynamic TDMA for inter-cluster communication• Poisson packet arrival at nodes• Clustering threshold: varied

Page 18: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 18

Simulation Results_1

Partial clustering

Delay and energy performance evaluation

No clustering

Complete clustering

Page 19: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 19

Simulation Results Analysis

• Clustering is not always (for all nodes) EE • However, it always eases the massive access problem

• Partial clustering outperforms non- and all-clustering• Delay performance is sacrificed for getting EE• Tradeoff delay/energy efficiency

Page 20: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 20

Simulation Results_2

Battery lives of cluster heads (CH) and members (CM) for proposed MACand dynamic TDMA

Cluster member in proposed MAC

Cluster head in proposed MAC

Page 21: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 21

Simulation Results Analysis

• Proposed MAC has extended the battery life of nodes.

• The extension is 500% on average and 800% at some points.

• The battery life of cluster heads is sacrificed by 50%.

• Cluster-head reselection scheme

Page 22: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 22

Conclusion

• Key requirement for enabling M2M communication over cellular networks• Providing efficiency

• Energy efficient massive access can prolong the lifetime• Clustering for all nodes is not EE• Using CH reselection algorithms, one can prolong the

overall network lifetime

Page 23: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 23

Future works

• Revisiting design principles of cellular networks to address massive access problem in an efficient way• Considering heterogeneous characteristics of machine

nodes• Considering heterogeneous QoS of machine nodes

Page 24: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 24

Thanks for your participation.

Page 25: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 25

Supporting Materials

Page 26: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 26

Cellular-based M2M

M2M communications supported by cellular networks• Direct or through gateway

Advantages:• Ubiquitous Coverage• Mobility & Roaming• Interference Control

Disadvantages:• Designed and optimized for small number of long-lived sessions

• Massive access problem• Energy inefficiency

• Attaching to the network is contention-based, etc.• Physical layer inefficiency

• Not optimized for small data payload

Page 27: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 27

Problem formulation• Access schemes

• Contention-free schemes– Not scalable (High signaling)– High average packet delay– High energy efficiency

• Contention-based schemes– Scalable and distributed– Low-delay in low-load/ High-delay in high-load– Energy wasting in medium- to high-load regime

• Reservation-based schemes– Contention-based in reservation, -free in transmission

Page 28: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 28

Details of the derived performance analyses

: aggregated traffic arrival rate

ps: probability of successful transmission

+ : packet length Round trip time from transmission to acknowledgement.

Back

Page 29: Energy Efficient MAC for Cellular-Based M2M Communications

04/15/2023 29

Energy Efficient System Design

• Energy Saving ≠ Energy Efficiency• Complete Saving of Energy = Shut down network

completely to save the most energy• Not desired!

• Purpose of energy-efficient wireless network design• Not to save energy• Make the best/efficient use of energy!

• Energy saving w/o losing service quality• Bit-per-Joule design metric