End of an Era: Does Social Housing have a Future? Keynote Presentation to the Manitoba Non-Profit Housing Association Annual Conference Nov 22nd, 2013 Steve Pomeroy Focus Consulting Inc. & Carleton University Centre for Urban Research and Education Steve Pomeroy Focus Consulting Inc 1
End of an Era: Does Social Housing have a Future?. Keynote Presentation to the Manitoba Non-Profit Housing Association Annual Conference Nov 22nd, 2013 Steve Pomeroy Focus Consulting Inc. & Carleton University Centre for Urban Research and Education. Key Observations. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
End of an Era: Does Social Housing have a Future?
Keynote Presentation to the Manitoba Non-Profit Housing Association Annual Conference Nov 22nd, 2013Steve Pomeroy Focus Consulting Inc. & Carleton University Centre for Urban Research and Education
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
1
Key Observations• Past decade has been a period of fundamental change in the
housing market and this has important consequences for the way governments (re) shape housing policy
• What happens in housing markets has impacts and implications for the affordable-social housing part of the housing system
• The scheduled termination of substantial federal housing subsidy similarly has profound implications for social housing
• This creates both challenges and opportunities for social housing providers and advocates
• Can you envision and reinvent a more sustainable future?
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
2
Housing Bubble?
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
4No, because fundamentals support prices
Fundamentals drive prices
• Demographics: Natural growth and migration
• Labour market: number of workers in labour force
• Income of workers (households) • Cost to finance: interest rates• Underwriting: mortgage insurance policy
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
5
Growing Population- Migrants
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
6Net migrants predominantly families and international
More people working, earning
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
7
Since 2000, yr-yr % change in wages has exceeded yr-yr change in pop = growing economy
Corroborating impacts: income gains and low interest
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
8Average earned income of “economic families”
Policy Changes - Amortization• Federal policy change to increase maximum amortization on
insured loans
• 2006: reduced DP to 0%• 2008: LTV 75% to 80%; reintroduce min 5% DP• Maximum LTV on refinancing reduced from 85% to 80%
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
9
Ownership affordability
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
10
Amount that average family income can borrow at prevailing 5 yr. mortgage rate
Added effect of new borrowing rules, at 40 yrs increases leverage by about $40k
12Note approx 15% new condo starts are investors = rental
Different pattern in starts Winnipeg vs. National
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
14
• Since 2001, 19% starts are rental; but renters = 33% all HH
• Starts not significantly impacting total rental stock = mainly replacement
Homeowner market growth
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
15Census data: No net growth in number renter households
Migration impacted rental, but only partly
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
16
Rental vacancies below 2% since 1999, but not as tight as expected
Key factor in changing vacancy rate was migration, not starts
Migration impacted rental, but only partly
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
17
Tightening Rental Market
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
18
But again, less than might be expected
Vacancies down, rents up
Easy access to ownership key factor releasing pressure from rental market
• Released potential pressure on the rental market
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
19
Will this continue?
• Key policy question is whether this ownership “release value” will remain in effect
• Suggest it will not• Will place new pressure on rental sector with further
tightening of vacancies and more upward pressure on rents
• Main variable is how migration trends as we go forward
• If city economic development wants growth, and province wants to attract international migrants, need to manage impacts (invest in housing supply)
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
20
Rental and Affordable Housing• Overlooked sectors during ownership
boom• Will now emerge as critical policy issues• Minimal growth in rental (mainly
replacement & some 4,000 affordable) • Serious erosion of lower rent part of rent
stock • And federal subsidies now starting to
expire
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
21
Rent increases exceed inflation
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
22
Erosion of lower rent units
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
24
• Reducing availability of low rent units impacts most vulnerable
• What are policy options?
Nominal rent categories, not adjusted for inflation
And declining federal subsidies on existing social housing
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
25
• To date subsidy expired on 3,900 units, reducing federal spending by $14 million;
• Next 6 years additional 8,500 units with $21 mill in subsidy will end
Federal subsidy linked to mortgage amortization: 50 yrs on PH and early NP; or 35 years on NP & Co-op since 1978
Is the sky falling?
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
26
• Federal subsidy ending, but so are mortgages• Some projects will face a challenge – Province may help• Many will have new opportunities• (more details in separate workshop to follow)
End of an Era: opening of a new one?• As Federal subsidies end & market trends
continue to evolve, the social/affordable sector will be impacted
• Need to have a strong presence and role – but what is it?• 50 years of activity• Some ownership and management capacity• Some assets & some liabilities
• New provincial association – setting a new course, new strategic direction, a new era?
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
27
Is the existing social housing sector sustainable? • I think not:
• Amalgam of individual providers vs. strong sector• Fragmented ownership – many small providers• Highly dependent on public subsidy (and renewal thereof) • Limited capacity to revitalize and redevelop properties • Limited capacity to leverage existing assets (credibility to lenders,
strength of security, professionalism and expertise) • Perverse subsidy and rent system that:
• Undermines sustainability• Creates disincentives to work and fails to support better outcomes
for residents
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
28
A new vision: a sustainable sector• Characteristics of sustainable sector:• Capable – professional, human resources /expertise• Less reliant on government – a partner not a dependent• Investible – attractive partner for lenders, philanthropic
investors, government to achieve their goals• Resourceful and entrepreneurial – able to leverage existing
assets• Compassionate but business focused – with a social mission • Exist to preserve and expand opportunities for low-income
and vulnerable households to secure appropriate and affordable housing
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
29
Apologies to JFK
• Ask not what government can do for the social housing sector; ask what the sector can do for government
• How do we reinvent ourselves as a strong vibrant effective professional sector that government will WANT to invest in
• How can we position social/affordable housing as a platform to create better outcomes for low income families and children? • Health, education labour market outcomes
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
30
Learn from Mistakes of Past• Build cheap inexpensive housing for poor people or build
sound good quality, but modest housing?• MUPs to control cost (utility and maintenance impacts)• Can’t create affordable housing – create housing then add
assistance so it can be affordable (e.g. early sec 15/27 no subsidy, then added RS)
• Project based subsidy highly inefficient (admin oversight)• RGI model (especially with income assist minimum rents) robs the
asset of viability• Cannot build equity, cannot build reserves cannot be sustainable• Wrong type of government support (became dependent)
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
31
Create Opportunity: International examples • UK housing associations• Netherlands Housing Companies• South Africa Social Housing Institutions• US “vouchering out”/moving to opportunity• with gov’t, but lever their accumulated assets
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
32
Lessons in International examples • What makes them different and inspiring?
• All separate asset from rental support• Use their asset base and corporate balance sheet
to lever financing for expansion• Partner with gov’t, but lever their accumulated
assets (i.e. not wholly dependent on govt $)
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
33
Insights and options• Create capacity to build equity for reinvestment (long term
sustainability and increased self reliance)• With low rents, valuations are low or negative (but can rectify)• What’s necessary to optimize potential financial leverage?
• Reform subsidy model, separate personal rental assistance from project based
• Reform social assistance minimum rents• Post expiry, not social, so max shelter component
• Need scale to be professional and investible• Explore consolidation of single project providers • Explore group structures, land trusts to hold assets
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
34
Insights and options (cont’d)• Examine existing assets and opportunities to
intensity/redevelop• Benefit of rising house prices
• Your property values have increased (underlying land values) • Selection disposition of valuable assets to reinvest elsewhere?
• Value of NP ownership in in preserving long term affordability• Break-even costs rise slower than market rent (Ekos/Ottawa)• At low end market rent achieve leverage but can also offer
government some competitive advantage (e.g. cost of stacked rent supplements)
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
35
Role of Government(s)• Fundamentally housing affordability is an income issue
• Income redistribution remains important• Provide subsidies to household not projects (province?)
• Argument for some capital funding for retrofit (e.g. under CEAP) = federal role
• EOA maturing mortgages creates federal direct financing room• Use to for low cost financing for renewal and expansion
• Responding to declining federal subsidies• Some important issues (especially underfunded capital renewal) • But pursue as opportunity, create attractive proposition for
investment (political win win)
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
36
A Bold New Social Sector
• Don’t settle for just preserving what you have • Set the bar higher – dream and think big• Create new opportunities for low income and
vulnerable people to live and succeed• Become more self reliant and sustainable
• Challenge yourselves and government
• Together you CAN DO BETTER!
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
37
Thank you
Ste
ve P
om
ero
y F
ocu
s C
on
sulti
ng
In
c
Additional background reports available at www.focus-consult.com