Encapsulating Knowledge for Intelligent Automatic Interaction Objects Selection Jean Vanderdonckt, François Bodart University of Namur, Belgium [email protected]in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Aspects in Computing Systems InterCHI'93 (Amsterdam, 24-29 April 1993), S. Ashlund, K. Mullet, A. Henderson, E. Hollnagel, T. White (Eds.), Addison Wesley, Reading (Massachusetts), pp. 424-429.
22
Embed
Encapsulating knowledge for intelligent interactoin object selection
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Encapsulating Knowledge for Intelligent Automatic
Interaction Objects SelectionJean Vanderdonckt, François Bodart
in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Aspects in Computing Systems InterCHI'93 (Amsterdam, 24-29 April 1993), S. Ashlund, K. Mullet, A. Henderson, E. Hollnagel, T. White (Eds.), Addison Wesley, Reading (Massachusetts), pp. 424-429.
Interaction Objects SelectionIntroduction
1. Is environment independent
2. Is included in an automatic generator
3. Involves application semantic
4. Requires a dialog model
Interaction Objects Selection (2)5. Requires a user model
6. Considers screen space
7. Uses explicit rules
8. Groups related objects
Selection Requirements1. Is environment independent
2. Is included in an automatic generator
3. Involves application semantic
4. Requires a dialog model
Abstract Interaction Objects Different presentations Same behaviours Abstract (AIO) versus Concrete (CIO)
– Abstract Interaction Objects are platform-independent
– Concrete Interaction Objects are platform-specific
Taxonomy of AIOs 6 sets : action, scrolling, static, control,