Employment Research Employment Research Institute Institute 1 Employability and Disadvantaged Parents: the Case of Working for Families Ronald McQuaid, Vanesa Fuertes, Sue Bond Employment Research Institute, Napier University, Edinburgh UK Paper presented at the ERSA
22
Embed
Employment Research Institute 1 Employability and Disadvantaged Parents: the Case of Working for Families Ronald McQuaid, Vanesa Fuertes, Sue Bond Employment.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
1
Employability and
Disadvantaged Parents: the Case of Working for Families
Ronald McQuaid, Vanesa Fuertes, Sue Bond
Employment Research Institute,
Napier University, Edinburgh UK
Paper presented at the ERSA Conference, Liverpool
August - September 2008
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
2
Structure of the presentation
• Background of Working for Families Fund (WFF)
• Aims of WFF
• Delivery Model
• Methodology for the evaluation
• Results
• Conclusions
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
5
Approach of WFF• Key worker model – a single worker contact to
engage and support parents through providing and signposting mentoring, advice, counselling, etc.
• Help both inactive and those in work (breaking the low pay-no pay cycle)
• In rural areas, support also provided to combat the barriers created by poor transport, limited services and the lack of a critical mass of clients
• Referral by various means: Public Employment Service and other agencies, informal reputation-building and ‘word of mouth’
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
6
Numbers of New Clients Registered by Month to 31 December 2008Total: 25,508 clients
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Total Phase 1 LAs Phase 2 LAs
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
7
Type of Qualification of Clients Registered to 31 March 2008 (%) compared to Scotland (Census 2001)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
No Qualifications/ below SVQ1
SVQ1-2 or equiv
SVQ3 or equiv
SVQ4-5 or equiv
Other
WFF
Scotland
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
8
Barriers to Progression for sustained contact WFF Clients to 31 March 07
68.80%
75.10%
35.50%
44.70%
1%
6.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Opportunitiesand Skills
CaringResponsibilities
Transport Other Issues None Missing
Barriers to Progression
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
9
TYPES OF OUTCOMES
Outcomes
‘Hard’ Outcomes(Key Transition)
‘Soft’ Outcomes
IntermediateActivities
Employability Measures
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
10
Take up a Job offer
1% (71)
SelfEmploy2% (115)
Full-Time18% (1147)
Voluntary work 16+hrs week
0% (19)Training/Educ
22% (1368)
Move Employment
1% (91)
Improve Employment
3% (212)
Sustainted Activity
27% (1703)
PT Less16 hrs/wk
6% (342)
PT 16to29 hrs/wk
20% (1262)
Type of Latest KEY Transitions to 31 December 07
Total Number of Transitions = 13,095 by March 2008
47%
31%
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
11
Intermediate Activity Outcomes (w/o Key Transition) to 31 March 07
Total IA outcomes without Key Transition = 850
Voluntary work btw 3 to 16 hrs
a week5% (45)
Work placement 30 hrs or more
3% (27)
Accumulated activity 20 hrs
or more92% (778)
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
12
Distance travelled: Change on Employability Measures – Change in Average Score between Registration and at Six-Month Review
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
How confident are you when meeting new people?
How would you rate your job skills (in relation to thetype of work you are looking for or would like to do)?
If you are not currently in work, how confident do youfeel about starting work?
How confident are you that you know what benefitsyou are entitled to (include work-related benefits, tax
How aware are you of the childcare servicesavailable in your area?
How easy do you find it to organize childcareservices for your children?
How confident are you that your children would bewell looked after by the childcare services available
How able are you to call on friends and family in yourarea to help with looking after your children?
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
13
All Client Outcomes to 31 March 2007 to 31 March 2008
Valid Six Month
monitoring
4% (906)
No significant
Outcome
28% (7,202)
Registered in
previous 6 month
(no outcome
expected)
7% (1,666)
Intermediate Activity
Outcome
10% (2,576)
Key transition
51% (13,095)
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
14
Progress for unemployed• Unemployed at registration who had a
transition → 33% (1103) FT employment and 36% (1223) PT (>16 hrs) employment
• Sick/disabled at registration who had a transition → 27% (94) FT employment and 28% (97) PT (>16 hrs) employment
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
15
Logistic regression model: transition
• Probability of achieving transition given range of independent variables/factors (individual, personal circumstances, external)
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
16
Logistic regression model:
• More likely to move into work, major training or education if:
• the person has qualifications (SVQ level 2 or above).
• being in either part time or full time education
• having English as their first language, • being a lone parent
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
17
Logistic regression model:
Less likely to move into work, etc. if:• pregnant, • having more than two children; • being over 45 years old;• being unemployed over 2 months; • having other forms of stress (such as drug
dependency); • living in accommodation that is not owner
occupied (especially if in hostel or supported care).
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
18
Conclusions• Major initiative that reached targets
• ‘Holistic’ model works well
• Reached the relatively disadvantaged
• But within this ‘group’ the less disadvantaged had greatest progression
• Range of employability factors that are important is large, and need to consider motivations etc.
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
20
END
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute
21
Hard Outcomes• entered full-time employment;• entered part-time employment;• entered self-employment;• being able to take up a job offer;• moved into different employment (changed jobs, moved to a
better paid job, etc.);• improved current employment (gain promotion, change
hours or pay, etc.);• sustained activity (employment, education or training);• entered or completed education or training course of at
least Six-Months duration;• entered voluntary work of 16 hours or more a week.
Employment Research Employment Research InstituteInstitute