1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROFILE OF THE COMPANY: The Rane brake linings ltd., plant-III launched Pondicherry. This plant was made on 02.02.1988. In beginning time 130 employees were working that there plant. The plant-3 was occupied on 29237 yards. The factory building was situated on 90000 squire bits. In the beginning stages of manufactures, only four types of products are induced. It is producing a Auto Mobile products such a particular position of all over the country. Types of products a disc pad, clutch facing and railway products. The RBL want to produce the products everything would be satisfied by the customer’s requirement. Products are constantly update in turn with evolving customer demands. Green material policy evolved to ensure products meet stringent Eco-norms. All the products designed and manufacture the Computer Aided Design (CAD) and sophisticated technical equipments like full-scale inertia dynamometer, thermo gravimetric analyses and pyrolysis gas.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROFILE OF THE COMPANY:
The Rane brake linings ltd., plant-III launched Pondicherry. This plant
was made on 02.02.1988. In beginning time 130 employees were working that there
plant. The plant-3 was occupied on 29237 yards. The factory building was situated on
90000 squire bits. In the beginning stages of manufactures, only four types of products
are induced.
It is producing a Auto Mobile products such a particular position of all over the
country. Types of products a disc pad, clutch facing and railway products. The RBL
want to produce the products everything would be satisfied by the customer’s
requirement. Products are constantly update in turn with evolving customer demands.
Green material policy evolved to ensure products meet stringent Eco-norms.
All the products designed and manufacture the Computer Aided Design (CAD)
and sophisticated technical equipments like full-scale inertia dynamometer, thermo
gravimetric analyses and pyrolysis gas.
The General Manager of RBL’s plant - III Pondicherry, R.J.R.FERNADO.
(operation)
Disc pads:
Asbestos
Asbestos free
Railway brake blocks:
K block
Asbestos Asbestos free
2
L block
Asbestos free
Clutch facings:
Asbestos moulded
Asbestos free moulded
Asbestos free cord wound
RANE GROUP:
The Rane group of companies founded and incorporated on 1929 in Washington
USA, is a privately held the company. Establishment of INDIA in the year year of
1929 the company technical association was made with the collaborator M/S
NISSHINBO industries in JAPAN of the manufacture of its products.
The company name was selected from an anagram created from of the common
letters of the first and last name of the original founders. This particular anagram was
selected because it was short, easy-to-say and remembers, and they liked the double-
9 First aid, ambulance & Treatment charges 28 26.9
10 First aid, ambulance, Treatment charges &other specify
2 1.9
Total 104 100
Inference:
From the above table it is found that 28 respondents are expecting first aid, ambulance & treatment charges and 20 respondents are expecting treatment charges from the management.
Chart 5.10
35
Table 5.11
Respondents opinion on Treatment
Inference:
S.NO Treatment No of respondents % of respondents
1
Good 35 33.7
2 Normal 48 46.2
3 Poor 9 8.7
4 No opinion 12 11.5
Total 104 100
36
The above table shows that the respondents (46.2%) says that, the treatment is
normal, 33.7% of respondents says that it is good. 11.5% of respondents says that they
had no opinion and 8.7% of respondents say that it is poor.
Chart 5.11
37
Table 5.12
Environment Condition
S. No Environment condition No of respondents % of respondents
1 Pleasant condition 14 13.5
2 Proper Ventilation 8 7.7
3 Fresh air 34 32.7
4 All 48 46.2
Total 104 100
Inference:
Most of the respondents are satisfied with working environment condition.
Chart 5.12
Table 5.13
38
Wearing Uniform system
Inference: The above table explain that, the respondents (13.5%) says that they feel no
difference is identified on wearing the uniform, 31.7% says that they maintain equality
among all. 43.3% of respondents says that they provide social security and 11.5% says
that they have no opinion.
Chart 5.13
S.No Wearing Uniform System No. of respondents % of respondents
1 No difference is identified 14 13.5
2
Maintain equality among all
33 31.7
3 Provide social security 45 43.3
4 No opinion 12 11.5
Total 104 100
39
40
Table 5.14
Transport Facility
Inference:
From the above table it shows that, respondents(10.6%) says that, they are
highly satisfied with transport facility, 31.7% of respondents says that they are
satisfied, 24.0% of respondents says that they are dissatisfied, 14.4% of respondents
says that, they are highly dissatisfied, 19.2% of respondents says that they are no
opinion.
Chart 5.14
S.No Transport facility No of respondents % of respondents
1
Highly satisfied 11 10.6
2
Satisfied 33 31.7
3 Dissatisfied 25 24.0
4 Highly dis satisfied 15 14.4
5
No opinion 20 19.2
Total 104 100
41
Table 5.15
Education Facilities
Inference:
From the above table it is found that 26.9% of respondents are satisfied with
library, computer train & daily news review and 25.0 % of respondents are satisfied
with free computer training.
S.No Education facilitiesNo of
Respondents% of
Respondents
1 Library 19 18.3
2 Free computer training 26 25.0
3 Reading room & daily news review 15 14.4
4 Library & free computer train 16 15.4
5Library, Computer train& daily news review
28 26.9
Total 104 100
42
Chart 5.15
43
Table 5.16
Supportive Activities Programs
Inference:
From the above table it shows that, most of the respondents (26.9%) says
that the personality development programs, 22.1% of respondents say that is safety and
environment classes, 20.1% of respondents say that product and process classes.
Chart 5.16
S. No Supportive Activities ProgramsNo of
respondents% of
respondents
1 Personality development programs 28 26.9
2 Social competency programs 16 15.4
3 Safety and environment classes 23 22.1
4 Product and process classes 21 20.2
5 Quality classes 16 15.4
Total 104 100.0
44
Table 5.17
Respondents bonus
Inference:
The above table shows that, most of the respondents (32.7%) have bonus 26.0%
0f the respondents have bonus and 24.0% of respondents have last year bonus.
Chart 5.17
S.NO Bonus No of respondents % of respondents
1 below 5000 18 17.3
2 5001 to 10000 25 24.0
3 10001 to 15000 27 26.0
4 15000 and above 34 32.7
Total 104 100
45
46
Table 5.18
Monetary BenefitsS.NO Monetary benefits No of respondents % of respondents
1Monetary reward for the continuous improvement
37 35.6
2 Monetary reward for problem solving 38 36.5
3 Others 29 27.9
Total 104 100.0
Inference:
The above table show that, most of the respondents says that monetary reward
for problem solving, 35.6% of the respondents says that it is monetary reward for the
continuous improvement and 27.9% of the respondents says that other monetary
benefit.
Chart 5.18
47
Table 5.19
Extra Curricular Activities
S.NO Extra curricular activitiesNo of
respondents% of
respondents
1 Sports 26 25.0
2 Company seminar 18 17.3
3
Sports & athletic 26 25.0
4
Sports & Company seminar 16 15.4
5
Sports, athletic, company seminar 18 17.3
Total 104 100
Inference:
From the above table it shows that, respondents is common in 25% says that
sports, sports & athletic, 17.3% of respondents says that they have company seminar,
sports & Athletic.
Chart 5.19
48
Table 5.20
Expected Rest Hour
Inference:
From the above table it is found that 80.8% of respondents are expecting 2hour once
and 19.2% respondents are expecting 4 hours once rest hour.
Chart 5.20
S.NO Rest hour No of respondents% of
respondents
12 hour once 84 80.8
2
4 hour once 20 19.2
Total 104 100
49
50
Table 5.21
Allotment of Various Shift System
Inference:
The above table explains that, most of the respondents (76%) says that they
comfortable in allotment of various shift system and 24% of respondents says that they
are comfortable in allotment of various shift system.
Chart 5.21
S.NOVarious shift
systemNo of respondents % of respondents
1 yes 79 76.0
2 No 25 24.0
Total 104 100
51
Table 5.22
Level of satisfaction working in night shift
52
Inference:
The above table shows that, most of the respondents 37.5 says that they are
dissatisfied while working in night shift and only 28.8% respondents are satisfied.
Chart 5.22
S.NOWorking in night
shiftNo. of respondents
% of respondents
1 Satisfied 30 28.8
2 Dissatisfied 39 37.5
3 Highly dissatisfied 14 13.5
4 No opinion 21 20.2
Total 104 100
53
54
Table 5.23
Level of satisfaction with the Drinking Water
Inference:
From the table it infers that 40.4% of respondents are satisfied with the drinking water facility while 27.9% of the respondents have no opinion about the facility.
Chart 5.23
S.NO Drinking water No respondents% of
respondents
1 Highly satisfied 7 6.7
2 Satisfied 42 40.4
3 Dissatisfied 23 22.1
4 Highly dis Satisfied 3 2.9
5 No opinion 29 27.9
Total 104 100
55
Table 5.24
Quality of Food
S.NO Quality of food No of respondents% of
respondents
1 Good 12 11.5
2 Normal 33 31.7
3 Poor 42 40.4
4 None 17 16.3
Total 104 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 31.7% of the respondents are normal with the quality
of food while 40.4% of the respondents have poor about the quality of food.
Chart 5.24
56
Table 5.25
Cleanliness of canteen
S.NO Cleanliness of canteenNo of
respondents% of respondents
1 Highly satisfied 3 2.9
2 Satisfied 20 19.2
3
Dissatisfied 42 40.4
4 Highly Dissatisfied 16 15.4
5 No opinion 23 22.1
Total 104 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 19.2%of the respondents is satisfied with the
cleanliness of canteen facility while 58.5% of respondents have dissatisfied with the
canteen facility.
Table 5.25
57
Table 5.26
Price of canteen
S.NO No of respondents % of respondents
1 Highly satisfied 24 23.1
2 Satisfied 46 44.2
3 Dissatisfied 20 19.2
4 Highly Dissatisfied 2 1.9
5 No opinion 12 11.5
Total 104 100
Inference:
44.2% of the respondents is satisfied with the price of canteen.
Chart 5.26
58
Table 5.27
Availability of Adequate Space
Inference:
Most of the respondents dissatisfied with the availability of adequate space in
canteen.
Chart 5.27
S.NO Availability of adequate spaceNo of
respondents% of respondents
1 Highly satisfied 3 2.9
2 Satisfied 28 26.9
3 Dissatisfied 21 20.2
4 Highly Dissatisfied 18 17.3
5No opinion 34 32.7
Total 104 100
59
Table 5.28
Labour Officer
Inference:
S.NO Labour OfficerNo of
respondents% of
respondents
1 Yes 67 64.4
2 No 37 35.6
Total 104 100
60
64.4% of the respondents is satisfied and 35.6% of the respondents is not
satisfied with the labour officer.
Chart 5.28
Table 5.29.1
TITLE: WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR RANK THE WELFARE FACILITIES PROVIDED IN THE ORGANIZATION
NO FACILITYNo. of
respondents1 Safety measures 152 Medical facility 13
3 Uniform facility 214 Transport facility 85 Education facility 126 Rest room 147 Drinking water 11
8 Canteen facility 10
61
Formula: X = WX/W
W = number of respondents
X = rating given by the respondent
Table 5.29.2
Inference:
From the above table most of the respondents are satisfied with welfare facilities
given by organization
Table 5.30.1
Title: WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR RANK THE WELFARE FACILITIES PROVIDED IN THE ORGANIZATION IN CANTEEN FACILITY
H.S S D.S H.Dno. of
respondentsTotal
Cleanliness 3 20 42 16 23 104
Serving 7 39 26 9 23 104
RANK WEIGHT X1 WX1 RANK
1 8 15 120 2
2 7 13 91 4
3 6 21 126 1
4 5 8 40 8
5 4 12 48 5
6 3 14 42 3
7 2 11 22 6
8 1 10 10 7
TOTAL 104 499 4.79807
62
Hygienic 9 38 17 16 24 104
Price 24 46 20 2 12 104
Light 20 43 18 6 17 104
Availability of adequate
space3 28 21 18 34 104
Interpretation:
Weighted average for rank the canteen facilities provided in the organization.
17) What are the supportive activities / enhancement programs conducted by management in this liberalized economic period to the employee
[a] Personality development programs [b] Social competency programs [c] Safety and environment classes [d] Product and process classes [e] Quality classes
18) What is your bonus amount on last year?
73
[a] below 5000 [b] 5001 to 10000 [c] 10001 to 15000 [d] 15000 and above 19) Is there any other monetary benefits from the organization
[a] Monetary reward for the continuous improvement [b] Monetary reward for problem solving [c] Others
20) Extra curricular activities by the organization
[a] Sports [b] Athletic [c] Company seminar [d] No opinion
WORKING HOURS & SHIFT SYSTEM :
21) Your expected rest hour in the organization
[a] 2 hour once [b] 4 hour once [c] 6 hour once
22) Are you comfortable with shift system ?
[a] Yes [b] No
23) What level of satisfaction do you have working in night shift
DRINKING WATER:
24) Are you satisfied with the drinking water facilities provided by the organization
Highly satisfied
Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly dis satisfied
No opinion
CANTEEN FACILITY :
Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly dis satisfied
No opinion
74
25) What is your opinion on quality of food?
[a] Good [b] normal [c] poor [d] none
26) Are you satisfied with the canteen facility
Highly satisfied
Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly dis satisfied
No opinion
Cleanliness
Serving
Hygienic
Price
Light
Availability of adequate space
LABOUR OFFICER
27) Do you need a labour officer?
[a]Yes [b] No
EMPLOYEE WELFARE FACILITY PROVIDED BY
“RANE BRAKE LININGS LIMITED”
28) Rank the welfare facilities provided in the organization
NO FACILITY RANK
1 Safety measures
2 Medical facility
75
3 Uniform facility
4 Transport facility
5 Education facility
6 Rest room
7 Drinking water
8 Canteen facility
29) Do you suggest any new welfare facilities required to the employee’s ,
Please mention ___________________
2. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
1. C.R. Kothari - Research Methodology – New age international (p) Ltd.,
2nd edition, 1985.
76
2. S.P Gupta - statistical method – Sultan chant & Sons Publishers, New
Delhi, thirty fourth editions, 2005
3. Aswathapa - Human resource and personnel management. Tata mc
graw -hill publishing-New Delhi second reprint 2002
4. R.C.Saxena - Labor problems and social welfare K.Nath&co.meeract-2