Top Banner
March 21, 2022 Placeholder for Presentation Name
37
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

April 18, 2023 Placeholder for Presentation Name

Page 2: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

SHRM Presents

The Changing Face of

Employee EngagementRyan Gunhold

Associate Faculty &

Education Consultant

March 2010

Timothy Sprake

HR Director

Page 3: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Workshop Learning Objectives

•Understand the importance and strategic impact of conducting an internal analysis of employee engagement that establishes the foundation for change to a culture where employees are genuinely engaged in the success of the organizations they support.

•Explore the different measurements of employee engagement and why these measures are more effective at achieving organizational success.

• Understand that an engagement survey is only one of the tools available that help organizations identify the need for change and improvement. More importantly participants will understand that an organizations willingness and ability to actively pursue their current reality on multiple fronts and through multiple methods is the primary path to improvement and ultimately greatness.

Page 4: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

4

What is a Magnetic Culture™ in the Workplace?Redefining Employee Satisfaction

• Defining Employee Engagement.

• Outcomes Driven by Employee Engagement.

• The Numbers Behind the Story of Engagement & Diversity.

• Key Drivers.

• The Top Ten Tool Kit.

Page 5: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

5

Satisfaction versus Engagement

• “What do I get”

• Employees more focused on Pay Satisfaction, Benefits Satisfaction, Physical Working Conditions, and other factors that satisfy.

• “What you give back”

• Employees more emotional, feeling of ownership, involvement in their job, passion, safe culture, and having meaning and purpose as an employee.

Page 6: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

6

What is a Magnetic Culture™ in the Workplace?

• A Magnetic Culture™ is one that draws talented employees to the workplace, and sustains an environment in which they are less likely to leave.

• It is marked by engaged employees who share a strong desire to be part of the value that the organization creates.

Page 7: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

7

Defining Employee Engagement

• Engaged Employees are:

– Motivated.

– Committed.

– Very involved in their work.

– An inspiration for others.

– Supportive of co-workers.

– Oriented to providing good customer service.

– Loyal.

– Optimistic about their work goals.

Page 8: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

8

Outcomes Influenced By Employee Engagement

• The following business outcomes result from successful implementation of Employee Engagement programs:

– Top Employer Ranking.

– Stellar Productivity and Financial Success.

– Outstanding Performance from Employees.

– A Magnetic Culture™ is established at your organization.

Page 9: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

9

Reputation

Customer Satisfaction

Absenteeism

Retention

Outcomes Influenced By Employee Engagement

EmployeeEngagement

Page 10: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

10

Employee Engagement – The Numbers Behind the Story

• Three Types of Employees1:

1. ENGAGED– Highly engaged and committed to the mission,

vision and values of the organization.

2. AMBIVALENT– They are “checked out”, lack of spirit and vivacity,

they feel unappreciated and insignificant.

3. ACTIVELY DISENGAGED– Negative energy, they focus on problems.

1Source: HR Solutions National Study

Page 11: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

11

Employee Engagement – The Numbers Behind the Story

• Percentage of Engaged Employees in the workplace1:

11Source: Source: HR Solutions National StudyHR Solutions National Study

64%

17% 19%

Engaged

Ambivalent

Actively Disengaged

Page 12: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

12

• Estimated costs of turnover in the United States economy: $5 trillion per year1.

• The cost of disengagement: $300 billion2.

1 Frank, F.D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C.R. (2004) The Race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21 st century. 2 Getting Engaged by Steve Bates, HR Magazine Feb 2004

Employee Engagement – The Numbers Behind the Story

Page 13: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

13

Gender Quiz

My job gives me the opportunity to do the things I do best.

This organization provides me the opportunity to improve my professional knowledge.

Senior Management of this organization is concerned about the employees.

I have an opportunity to participate in decisions made by my supervisor that affect my work environment.

All in all, I am satisfied with my job.

Page 14: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

14

Changing Priorities

1

2

3

4

5

6

<25 26-34 35-39 40-54 55+

Opportunity forTraining

Careeradvancement

Supervision

Pay

Benefits

Policies andprocedures

Age Group

Impo

rtan

ce (

6=M

ost

Impo

rtan

t)

Page 15: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

15

Employee Engagement & Diversity Satisfaction

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

StronglyDisagree

Neither StronglyAgree

Job Sat

Diversity Sat

% F

avor

able

Page 16: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

16

Employee Engagement – The Numbers Behind the Story

• Mature Generation—A Different Perspective on Work.

– 47% increase in age 55+ workers by 20101.– 80% of Baby Boomers plan to work at least part-time during

retirement1.– 69% of age 45+ plan to work “well beyond age 65”2.

• Characteristics3

– Trust for authority; optimal in hierarchical structure.– Compliant to organizational practices/policies.– Team players.– Long tenure at single company.– Different appreciation characteristics: Value benefits programs, role within the organization,

and recognition.

• Less value assigned to pay levels (not pay fairness).

• The older generation “lives to work” whereas the younger population “works to live.”

1 Source AARP,2 Source J. Walter Thompson, 20043 Source – The Concours Group

Page 17: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Connecting the Generations

Veteran Baby Boomers Generation Xers Generation Y Millenials

Outlook Practical Optimistic Skeptical Hopeful

Work Ethic Dedicated Driven Balanced Ambitious

View of Authority

Respectful Love/hate Unimpressed Relaxed, polite

Leadership by Hierarchy Consensus Competence Collaboration

Relationships Personal Sacrifice Personal gratification Reluctant to commit Loyal

Perspective Civic Team Self Civic

Influencing Messages

• Make do or do without• Stay in line• Sacrifice• Be heroic• Consider the common

good

• Be anything you want • Change the world• Work well with others• Live up to expectation• Duck and cover

• Don’t count on it• Remember – heroes…

aren’t• Get real• Survive – stayin’ alive• Ask “why?”

• Be smart– you are special

• Leave no one behind• Connect 24/7• Achieve now!• Serve your community

Source: Willa Starks, Parkview Health: The Cross Generational Workplace

Page 18: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

18

The Face of CityU

Page 19: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Six Item Highlights from Data Analysis

• There is good communication between members of my work group. (80% Favorable, Education Norm: 67, National Norm: 68, BIC Norm: 80)

• My supervisor is friendly and helpful. (83% Favorable, Education Norm: 79, National Norm: 78, BIC Norm: 87)

• The person/persons doing my performance appraisal is/are aware of my work. (75% Favorable, National Norm: 69, BIC Norm: 79)

• My immediate manager’s actions are consistent with what she/she communicates. (74% Favorable, National Norm: 69, BIC Norm: 78)

• I can explain the organization’s strategy/mission to my family, friends and coworkers. (76% Favorable, National Norm: 69, BIC Norm: 84)

• I feel free to express new ideas and work methods which I feel will help this organization. (67% Favorable, National Norm: 55, BIC Norm: 81)

BIC – Best in Class

19

Page 20: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

20

CityU of Seattle’s Employee Engagement Levels

Ambivalent, 66% (59% Norm)

Actively Disengaged, 19%

(16% Norm)

Actively Engaged, 14% (25% Norm)

A Magnetic Culture™ is one that draws talented employees to the workplace, empowers them, and sustains an environment in which they are less likely to leave.

It is marked by engaged employees who share a strong desire to be part of the value that the organization creates.

Page 21: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

21

4653

6874

566267

81

65

75 76

85

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Training &Development

Strategy/Mission Overall JobSatisfaction

City U Of Seattle 2008Education NormNational NormBest-in-Class Norm

Per

cent

F

avor

able

Best-in-Class – 90th Percentile in our database.

Three Dimension Opportunities from Data Analysis

Page 22: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Ancillary Highlights

In addition, when closing each feedback session, the facilitator made a point to ask what employees liked most about their jobs and working at City University of Seattle. The most frequent responses included the following types of comments:

Coworkers Benefits Empowerment President Variety of work Flexibility Supervisors Friendly and challenging environment

Page 23: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

23

Demographic Dimension Profile Report

Dimension Number Responding

Percent Favorable 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent Favorable

Compared to rest

Percent Unfavorable

1. Overall Job Satisfaction

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 65% 12%

National Norm 76%

Male 52 60% -8% 14%

Female 133 67% 8% 12%

3. Benefits Satisfaction

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 56% 19%

National Norm 61%

Male 52 44% -16% * 21%

Female 133 61% 16% * 17%

5. Communication

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 56% 21%

National Norm 66%

Male 52 48% -10% ** 24%

Female 133 59% 10% ** 20%

8. Training & Development

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 46% 25%

National Norm 68%

Male 52 44% -3% 24%

Female 133 47% 3% 26%

Male vs. Female

Page 24: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

24

Demographic Dimension Profile Report

Dimension Number Responding

Percent Favorable 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent Favorable

Compared to rest

Percent Unfavorable

1. Overall Job Satisfaction

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 65% 12%

National Norm 76%

25 and Under 10 92% 29% ** 0%

26 - 34 31 74% 11% * 8%

35 - 39 15 69% 4% 9%

40 - 54 65 57% -12% ** 16%

55 and Over 64 64% -2% 13%

8. Training & Development

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 46% 25%

National Norm 68%

25 and Under 10 77% 32% ** 7%

26 - 34 31 56% 12% * 19%

35 - 39 15 29% -19% ** 48%

40 - 54 65 37% -14% ** 31%

55 and Over 64 49% 5% * 19%

AGE

Page 25: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

25

Demographic Dimension Profile Report

Dimension Number Responding

Percent Favorable 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent Favorable

Compared to rest

Percent Unfavorable

1. Overall Job Satisfaction

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 65% 12%

National Norm 76%

Less than one year 34 78% 16% ** 8%

1-3 years 80 60% -9% * 14%

4-6 years 34 65% -1% 14%

7-10 years 15 59% -7% * 19%

More than ten years 22 69% 5% * 6%

8. Training & Development

City University of Seattle 2008 EOS - Total 187 46% 25%

National Norm 68%

Less than one year 34 64% 23% ** 19%

1-3 years 80 46% -1% * 30%

4-6 years 34 33% -15% * 28%

7-10 years 15 38% -9% 18%

More than ten years 22 44% -3% 17%

Years of Service

Page 26: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Training and Development

Feedback sessions included the following types of comments:

“There is no training or development. Orientation to company is great. You learn about the benefits. The training is fine when you first come here. There are people here that help you out. Once you are trained that is it. It is pretty much it.” Nine agreed.

“I don’t feel organization is committed to Training & Development. I got some in my own department; but there is no institutional commitment to it.” [10 of 11 Managers agreed]

• Job-role specific department training• IT Training,

• Seminars,• MS Excel training, • Phone etiquette/ transferring phone calls.

• SharePoint• Leadership Development.

• How to hold people accountable.• How to deal with underperformers.

Page 27: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

27

Key Drivers

1. Promotions/Career Advancement

2. Strategy/Mission

3. Satisfaction with the Work

4. Customer Service

5. Supervisory Promotion Teamwork

6. Pay Satisfaction

7. Coworker Performance/Cooperation

8. Concern for Employees

9. Job Stress

10. Benefits Satisfaction

Top 10 Influencers on Employees’ Overall Job Satisfaction/Engagement

Determination of key drivers based on survey responses in ourNational Normative Database, representing over

2.2 million participants and 2,100 organizations.

Page 28: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

28

Key Drivers of Employee Engagement

Page 29: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Action Planning in ActionPro®

Page 30: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

ActionPro® / Action Planning Process

Page 31: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

31

Action Planning to Lowest Organizational Level

Page 32: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Meet with your

Supervisor to discuss

Department

Opportunities

Global Opportunities for

Senior Management

Develop Action Plan

with ActionPro®

Submit Action Plan to

Supervisor & wait for approval

Implement &

Communicate Action

Plan

APulse: Measure Results

Discuss/adjust Action Plan with

staff

Action Planning Process

Page 33: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

Action Planning in 7 Simple Steps

1. ROADMAP to EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT REVIEW

2. INITIAL POST-SURVEY COMMUNICATION TO ALL EMPLOYEES

3. POST-SURVEY COMMUNICATION AMONG ALL MANAGERS

4. DEVELOP AND SAVE INITIAL ACTION PLANS IN ACTIONPRO®

5. MEET WITH YOUR EMPLOYEES TO DISCUSS THE ACTION PLAN

6. SUBMIT, COMMUNICATE, AND IMPLEMENT ACTION PLANS

7. MEASURE THE RESULTS OF THE ACTION PLAN

Senio

r M

anagem

ent

All

Managem

ent

Page 34: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

©2007 HR Solutions, Inc. 34

The Top Ten Ways To Create a Magnetic Culture™: A Best Practices Tool Kit

1. Provide career development opportunities.2. Competitive salary.3. Flexible work schedules.4. Optimal day-to-day work life.5. Provide top-notch customer service.6. Ensure company mission is clear.7. Retain best supervisors and managers.8. Strong senior management.9. Maintain positive organizational culture.10. Generous benefits.

Page 35: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

35

Employee Engagement & Diversity Satisfaction

37

87

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% F

avora

ble

Q80: All in all, I am satisfiedwith my job.

Very Dissatisfiedon DiversityVery Satisfied onDiversity

Page 36: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

36

Creating a Magnetic Culture™ in the Workplace

The kind of commitment I find among the best performers across virtually every field is a single-minded passion for what they do, an unwavering desire for excellence in the way they think and the way they work. Genuine confidence is what launches you out of bed in the morning, and through your day with a spring in your step.

Jim Collins

Source: Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don't, Page: 87

Page 37: Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold

October 2, 2007 37

Questions / Comments

Thank You!