Emplacement age and isotope geochemistry of Sung Valley alkaline–carbonatite complex, Shillong Plateau, northeastern India: Implications for primary carbonate melt and genesis of the associated silicate rocks Rajesh K. Srivastava a, * , Larry M. Heaman b , Anup K. Sinha a , Sun Shihua c a Igneous Petrology Laboratory, Department of Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India b Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 c RCMRE, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datum Road, Beijing 100101, PR China Received 16 February 2004; accepted 29 September 2004 Available online 23 November 2004 Abstract The early Cretaceous (Albian–Aptian) Sung Valley ultramafic–alkaline–carbonatite complex is one of several alkaline intrusions that occur in the Shillong Plateau, India. This complex comprises calcite carbonatite and closely associated ultramafic (serpentinized peridotite, pyroxenite and melilitolite) and alkaline rocks (ijolite and nepheline syenite). Field relationship and geochemical characteristics of these rocks do not support a genetic link between carbonatite and associated silicate rocks. There is geochemical evidence that pyroxenite, melilitolite and ijolite of the complex are genetically related. Stable (C and O) and radiogenic (Nd and Sr) isotope data clearly indicate a mantle origin for the carbonatite samples. The carbonatite ENd (+0.7 to +1.8) and ESr (+4.7 to +7.0) compositions overlap the field for Kerguelen ocean island basalts. One sample of ijolite has Nd and Sr isotopic compositions that also plot within the field for Kerguelen ocean island basalts, whereas the other silicate–carbonatite samples indicate involvement with an enriched component. These geochemical and isotopic data indicate that the rocks of the Sung Valley complex were derived from and interacted with an isotopically heterogeneous subcontinental mantle and is consistent with interaction of a mantle plume (e.g. Kerguelen plume) with lithosphere. A U–Pb perovskite age of 115.1F5.1 Ma obtained for a sample of Sung Valley ijolite also supports a temporal link to the Kerguelen plume. The observed geochemical characteristics of the carbonatite rocks indicate derivation by low-degree partial melting (~0.1%) of carbonated mantle peridotite. This melt, containing a substantial amount of alkali elements, interacted with peridotite to form metasomatic clinopyroxene and olivine. This process could progressively metasomatize lherzolite to form alkaline wehrlite. D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Carbonatite; Silicate rocks; Sung Valley; India; U–Pb perovskite Age; Sr and Nd isotopes; Primary carbonate melt; Kerguelen plume 0024-4937/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2004.09.017 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 542 2570925; fax: +91 542 2368174. E-mail address: [email protected] (R.K. Srivastava). Lithos 81 (2005) 33 – 54 www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos
22
Embed
Emplacement age and isotope geochemistry of Sung Valley alkaline–carbonatite complex, Shillong Plateau, northeastern India: implications for primary carbonate melt and genesis of
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos
Lithos 81 (200
Emplacement age and isotope geochemistry of Sung Valley
Implications for primary carbonate melt and genesis of the
associated silicate rocks
Rajesh K. Srivastavaa,*, Larry M. Heamanb, Anup K. Sinhaa, Sun Shihuac
aIgneous Petrology Laboratory, Department of Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IndiabDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
cRCMRE, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datum Road, Beijing 100101, PR China
Received 16 February 2004; accepted 29 September 2004
Available online 23 November 2004
Abstract
The early Cretaceous (Albian–Aptian) Sung Valley ultramafic–alkaline–carbonatite complex is one of several alkaline
intrusions that occur in the Shillong Plateau, India. This complex comprises calcite carbonatite and closely associated ultramafic
(serpentinized peridotite, pyroxenite and melilitolite) and alkaline rocks (ijolite and nepheline syenite). Field relationship and
geochemical characteristics of these rocks do not support a genetic link between carbonatite and associated silicate rocks. There
is geochemical evidence that pyroxenite, melilitolite and ijolite of the complex are genetically related. Stable (C and O) and
radiogenic (Nd and Sr) isotope data clearly indicate a mantle origin for the carbonatite samples. The carbonatite ENd (+0.7 to
+1.8) and ESr (+4.7 to +7.0) compositions overlap the field for Kerguelen ocean island basalts. One sample of ijolite has Nd and
Sr isotopic compositions that also plot within the field for Kerguelen ocean island basalts, whereas the other silicate–carbonatite
samples indicate involvement with an enriched component. These geochemical and isotopic data indicate that the rocks of the
Sung Valley complex were derived from and interacted with an isotopically heterogeneous subcontinental mantle and is
consistent with interaction of a mantle plume (e.g. Kerguelen plume) with lithosphere. A U–Pb perovskite age of 115.1F5.1 Ma
obtained for a sample of Sung Valley ijolite also supports a temporal link to the Kerguelen plume. The observed geochemical
characteristics of the carbonatite rocks indicate derivation by low-degree partial melting (~0.1%) of carbonated mantle
peridotite. This melt, containing a substantial amount of alkali elements, interacted with peridotite to form metasomatic
clinopyroxene and olivine. This process could progressively metasomatize lherzolite to form alkaline wehrlite.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Carbonatite; Silicate rocks; Sung Valley; India; U–Pb perovskite Age; Sr and Nd isotopes; Primary carbonate melt; Kerguelen plume
0024-4937/$ - s
doi:10.1016/j.lit
* Correspondi
E-mail addr
5) 33–54
ee front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
hos.2004.09.017
ng author. Tel.: +91 542 2570925; fax: +91 542 2368174.
35.30 to 46.46. This reflects the control minerals
present in the carbonatites, such as apatite, perovskite,
pyrochlore, etc. have on the total REE budget as they
have very highP
REE and show high LREE/HREE
values (Hornig-Kjarsgaard, 1998). Although the Sung
Valley rocks show different REE patterns, possibly
indicating different origins or magma evolution
processes, to a first approximation that the REE
ondrite values are after Evensen et al. (1978).
Fig. 6. (a) d18O and d13C plot. Taylor’s PIC box after Taylor et al.
(1967), modified PIC box after Deines (1989) and Keller and Hoefs
(1995), and normal mantle values after Kyser (1990) and Keller and
Hoefs (1995). (b) d18O and 87Sr/86Srinitial plot. This diagram also
shows primary mantle values and hypothetical mixing model (after
James, 1981).
R.K. Srivastava et al. / Lithos 81 (2005) 33–5444
patterns of pyroxenites, melilitolites and ijolites could
be explained by differentiation of a single magma.
5.2. C and O isotopes
Stable isotopic, particularly C and O, studies have
been successfully applied to deciphering the origin of
carbonatites. Taylor et al. (1967) were first to
recognize the range of d13C and d18O values in
unaltered and un-weathered primary magmatic carbo-
natites. According to them and some other later
researchers, primary magmatic carbonatites exhibit a
relatively narrow range of �4x to �8x for d13C and
+6x to +10x for d18O (Taylor et al., 1967; Deines
and Gold, 1973; Sheppard and Dawon, 1973). Deines
(1989) and Keller and Hoefs (1995) have reviewed
available carbon and oxygen isotopic data for
carbonatites and suggested that most magmatic
carbonatites, termed primary igneous carbonatites
(PIC), have d13C values between �1x to �9x and
d18O values between +5x and +12x. Carbon and
oxygen isotopic compositions of the Sung Valley
carbonatite samples have been plotted on Fig. 6a. This
diagram also includes the range for un-degassed and
un-contaminated bnormalQ mantle values (this
includes mantle xenoliths, MORBs, OIBs and other
continental basalts); d18O ranges between +5.5x and
+8x and d13C ranges between �5x and �7x (after
Kyser, 1990; Keller and Hoefs, 1995). The carbonatite
samples of the Sung Valley complex analysed by Ray
et al. (1999) are also included in this diagram (open
triangles). All samples fall well within the modified
primary magmatic carbonatite field. An important
conclusion that can be gleaned from this diagram is
that d18O compositions of these carbonatite samples
plot within the field of primary magmatic carbonatites
defined by Taylor et al. (1967) and the normal mantle
range (Kyser, 1990). This implies that the carbonatite
samples were not affected either by any crustal
assimilation or loss of fluids during emplacement.
The mantle nature of these carbonatite samples is also
confirmed on the 87Sr/86Srinitial versus d18O diagram
(Fig. 6b) as they fall well within the primary mantle
(PM) field. This diagram also includes a hypothetical
mixing field that illustrates the effect of mantle source
contamination and crustal contamination on the Sr and
O isotopic compositions of derived mantle melt
(James, 1981). The Sung Valley carbonatite samples
do not show any such contamination trends and fall
well within the mantle range.
5.3. Sr, Nd and Pb isotopes
87Sr/86Srinitial and 143Nd/144Ndinitial ratios in the
Sung Valley samples show a wide range and vary
between 0.704830–0.710371 and 0.511845–0.512541,
respectively. All samples have positive ESr values
(+4.7 to +85.1). Slightly positive ENd values (+0.7 to
+1.8) are observed for carbonatite samples but all
R.K. Srivastava et al. / Lithos 81 (2005) 33–54 45
silicate samples show negative ENd values (�1.1 to
12.8). The Sr and Nd isotopic composition of two
carbonatite samples in this study are similar to the
results reported by Veena et al. (1998) for five
carbonatite samples (listed in Table 4). The Nd initial
isotopic composition of the samples analysed in this
study are slightly lower (0.512538–0.512541) com-
pared to the Veena et al. (1998) samples (0.512571–
0.512594). A considerable difference is observed
between the isotopic composition of the carbonatite
and the silicate samples. The carbonatite and silicate
samples plot separately in the 87Sr/86Srinitial versus143Nd/144Ndinitial diagram (Fig. 7a); the carbonatite
Fig. 7. (a) 143Nd/144Nd and 87Sr/86Sr isotope correlation plot,
showing the main oceanic mantle reservoirs of Zindler and Hart
(1986). The mantle array is defined by many oceanic basalts and a
bulk Earth values of 87Sr/86Sr can be observed from this trend. (b)
qNd and qSr plot. Field of young carbonatites (b200 Ma) is taken
from Bell and Blenkinsop (1989) and field of Kerguelen OIB is
taken from Veena et al. (1998) and references therein.
samples and one sample of ijolite (SV/14) fall
within the primitive mantle field (denoted dmantle
arrayT in Fig. 7a), whereas the other two samples, an
ijolite and nepheline syenite, plot near the enriched
mantle II (EM-II) field. Carbonatite samples show
the lowest 87Sr/86Srinitial ratios and the highest143Nd/144Ndinitial ratios compared to all other sam-
ples and plot close to the Bulk Silicate Earth field in
Fig. 7a. Enriched mantle type-I (EM-I) has low87Sr/86Sr values, whereas EM-II has relatively high87Sr/86Sr values (Zindler and Hart, 1986). The high87Sr/86Sr values observed in some silicate rocks are
probably the result of metasomatism by fluids/melts
with a EM-II signature.
Different mantle reservoirs can be defined on the
basis of their isotopic taxonomy. On this basis, at
least four mantle components (DMM, HIMU, EM-I
and EM-II), are required to explain the isotopic
diversity observed for most oceanic basalts (Zindler
and Hart, 1986). In addition to these four reservoirs,
Hart et al. (1992) have proposed another mantle
component that they define as FOZO and consider
to represent focal zone basalts. Hart et al. (1992)
suggested two models to account for this FOZO
component and in both the FOZO signature is
derived by mixing of plumes containing EM and
HIMU components from the core-mantle boundary
or lower mantle. The difference between these two
is that in one model no component is derived from
the boundary layer at 670 km, whereas in the other
model it is derived from the boundary layer at 670
km. Bell and Tilton (2001) have suggested that
mantle with either HIMU or EM signature or a
mixture of both can also produce melts that can lead
to carbonatite. Although it is difficult to estimate the
exact proportion of the different mantle reservoirs
involved to generate the range in isotopic compo-
sitions preserved in the Sung Valley complex, it is
possible that mixing of HIMU and EM-II reservoirs,
similar to the FOZO model, could explain the range
in Sr and Nd isotopic composition, especially for the
silicate end members. Interaction with old continen-
tal crust could also account for the high ESr and low
eNd isotopic nature of some silicate samples;
however, the high concentration of Sr and Nd in
the Sung Valley rocks make it unlikely that
assimilation of average crust could account for these
extreme isotopic compositions.
R.K. Srivastava et al. / Lithos 81 (2005) 33–5446
The strontium isotopic composition for one
pyroxenite sample from the Sung Valley complex
was analysed by Ray et al. (2000). The 87Sr/86Srinitialratio obtained for this sample is 0.7051 and is
intermediate in composition between the carbonatite
samples (0.704710–0.704872) and one sample of
ijolite (0.705681; SV/14), also plotting within the
dprimitiveT mantle field. Another diagram, using ENd
and ESr values, is also prepared for the studied samples
(Fig. 7b). This diagram also shows the field for most of
the oceanic island basalts (OIB) from the Kerguelen
Island (Dosso and Murthy, 1980; Storey et al., 1992;
Weis et al., 1993; Mahoney et al., 1995) and the young
African carbonatites (b200 Ma; Nelson et al., 1988;
Bell and Blenkinsop, 1989; Bell and Tilton, 2001).
Carbonatite samples from the Sung Valley complex
analysed by Veena et al. (1998) are also included in
this plot but recalculated assuming an emplacement
age of 105 Ma. All the carbonatite samples analysed in
this study as well as those reported by Veena et al.
(1998) plot in the upper right quadrant of the diagram,
whereas silicate samples plot in the lower right
quadrant. Most of the young African carbonatites
(b200 Ma) plot in the upper left quadrant (Nelson et
al., 1988; Bell and Blenkinsop, 1989; Bell and Tilton,
2001 and references therein). All the Sung Valley
carbonatite samples and one ijolite sample fall in the
Kerguelen OIB field. It is noted from this diagram that
the carbonate and silicate components of the studied
samples define a trend away from the characteristic
depleted values of worldwide carbonatites into the
enriched quadrant. This indicates the involvement of
an enriched reservoir for the Sung Valley carbonatites
that is somewhat different from most other carbona-
tites. The cause of this enrichment may either be by the
subduction of crustal material into the mantle or by
mantle metasomatism. Whatever the cause, the iso-
topic data reported here for the Sung Valley samples
indicate that the silicate rocks clearly either contain a
greater proportion of this enriched component com-
pared to the carbonatites or have involved an isotopi-
cally distinct enriched mantle source region such as
EM-II.
The 206Pb/204Pb initial ratio (18.2) obtained for the
perovskite (extracted from ijolite) from the isochron
diagram (Fig. 2) is lower than what is reported for
most young carbonatites. Veena et al. (1998) also
reported a lower 206Pb/204Pb initial ratio (19.02–
19.30) for two carbonatite samples. These low values
indicate that either a low U/Pb source (significantly
less radiogenic than HIMU) is required for ijolite
magma formation or there is interaction with a quite
low U/Pb mantle reservoir during their generation. It
cannot be a crustal phenomenon since average crust
has quite high U/Pb.
6. Discussion
Before integrating the petrological and geochem-
ical data, it is important to review the salient field
relationships between the different rock units of the
Sung Valley complex. Some important field obser-
vations are:
1. Ijolite clearly shows a discordant relationship with
pyroxenite.
2. Melilitolite intrudes peridotite as well as pyroxenite
but not the other rock units of the complex.
3. Dykes/veins of nepheline syenite and carbonatite
intrude pyroxenite as well as ijolite and show sharp
contacts.
These field observations clearly indicate that
different magmas with distinct histories may be
involved in the generation of the Sung Valley
complex. It seems likely that silicate and carbonatite
members of the complex are derived from discrete
magma batches. In addition, the age determinations
for the Sung Valley complex are consistent with the
possibility as much as several million years has
elapsed between the intrusion of ijolite (115.1 Ma;
this study) and the carbonatite (107.2 Ma; Ray et al.,
2000). This age difference is consistent with the field
relationships that indicate that carbonatite is youngest
unit and intrudes all other rock types.
It is also difficult to establish any genetic relation-
ship between the carbonatite and silicate rocks based
on the chemical and isotopic composition of the
various Sung Valley lithologies. Nepheline syenite
and carbonatite have entirely different chemical
characteristics than the pyroxenites, melilitolites and
ijolites. The latter group of silicate rocks shows some
genetic relationship with each other, as they appear to
form a geochemical continuum for some elements.
However, even for these rocks, there are some
R.K. Srivastava et al. / Lithos 81 (2005) 33–54 47
geochemical variations that are difficult to explain if
they were all derived from the same magma chamber.
For example, no two multi-element spidergrams are
identical. From the rare-earth element patterns, it can
be concluded that pyroxenite, melilitolite, ijolite and
nepheline syenite rocks are derived from different
melts but these melts have a common source.
Carbonatite samples show the most distinct chemical
composition with quite different REE patterns. The
carbonatites are, therefore, likely derived from an
exclusively different magma. Another important
point, reflected in the multi-element and rare-earth
element patterns of the nepheline syenite samples, is
that a group of samples show different pattern than
other, particularly one group shows remarkable differ-
ence in La concentration. The samples collected from
the Valley portion of the complex have low La
compositions. Lower La concentration may be
observed in pyroxenes (Henderson, 1984). Samples
with low La and Ce are probably due to some
metasomatic process during which other elements
have also changed their concentration, such as
depletion Th and Y. Lower LREE concentrations,
particularly La and Ce, are also observed in several
upper mantle rocks (Frey, 1984). If any melt
interacted with such upper mantle, then such melts
may show the observed REE patterns.
The isotopic compositions, both stable and radio-
genic, also indicate that the silicate and carbonatite
magmas are derived from different source. The
isotopic compositions of carbonatite samples clearly
indicate their mantle origin with little or no enriched
mantle or crustal influence. The d18O composition
of the carbonatites (7.35–7.91x; Table 4) is
identical to PM values but the d13C compositions
(�3.1x to 3.3x) is slightly higher than typical PM
(�5x to �7x), although these values are similar to
most of the magmatic igneous carbonatites. The
modelling done by the Zheng (1990) suggests that
strongly depleted values of d13C would be necessary
to propose Rayleigh fractionation of a fluid with
XCO2of ~0.4. The dominant species in the fluid
would have to be H2CO3. Carbonatite samples less
depleted in d13C would necessitate lower XCO2-
values in the degassing fluids. He further stated that
carbonates with d13C near zero would have to be
deposited from fluids very poor in CO2. Deines
(1989) has established that a Rayleigh fractionation
model successfully explains the d13C enrichment in
carbonatites. But the fractionation processes should
also be observed in d18O values, which are not
observed in the studied carbonatite samples. Another
process that may affect the d13C composition is the
assimilation of pre-existing limestone, but the gen-
eral absence of limestone in the Assam–Meghalaya
plateau precludes this possibility. These observations
suggest that the observed d13C and d18O values are
primary and do not show any isotopic fractionation.
If correct, then the carbonatites probably crystallized
under plutonic conditions and their isotopic signa-
ture reflects a mantle (source) composition.
The Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of the Sung
Valley carbonatites also suggest a relatively primitive
mantle origin. On the other hand, the Sr and Nd
isotopic compositions of the silicate samples plot
between HIMU and EM fields. The substantial
isotopic and geochemical differences between carbo-
natite and the silicate rocks in the Sung Valley
complex suggest that both are derived from two
different sources; carbonatites are derived from the
mantle (broadly similar to Bulk Silicate Earth; i.e.
equivalent to Homogeneous Primitive Mantle),
whereas associated silicate rocks are derived from
an enriched source. The enrichment of mantle may be
possible either by the subduction of crustal material
into the mantle or by mantle metasomatism.
Bell et al. (1998) have nicely outlined the details of
this interaction. They pointed out that metasomatism
is restricted only to the lithosphere, which holds melt
incursions generated from the convecting astheno-
sphere. Recently, Bell (2001, 2002) explained the
association of carbonatitic, alkalic and kimberlitic
magmatism to the plume activity. A link between
mantle plume activity and the genesis of such alkaline
rocks are supported by the presence of a HIMU-like
(mantle with high U/Pb ratio) isotopic signature. Hart
(1988) was the first to recognize the involvement of a
HIMU mantle composition in the genesis of OIBs.
The HIMU signature is also noted in some mantle
xenoliths from East Africa (Rudnick et al., 1993). The
spatial and temporal association of carbonatites and
the associated silicate rocks with many CFBs also
supports a plume-related origin. It has been noted that
many mafic–alkaline–carbonatite complexes were
emplaced at the latest stages of CFB magmatism
(Bell, 2001; Heaman et al., 2002).
Fig. 8. 87Sr/86Srinitial and qNd plot for the studied samples and the
Kerguelen Plateau basalts. Kerguelen data are taken from Michard
et al. (1986), Dosso et al. (1988), Storey et al. (1988, 1992) and
Mahoney et al. (1983, 1995).
R.K. Srivastava et al. / Lithos 81 (2005) 33–5448
A recent noble gas study (using Xe and Ne
isotopes) in carbonatite also corroborates a carbona-
tite–plume connection (Sasada et al., 1997). These
ratios support an origin for carbonatites from a
primitive source. These studies also suggest that
carbonatites of different ages have similar 129Xe/130Xe
and 40Ar/36Ar ratios, but quite different Sr and Nd
isotopic signatures, reflecting both enriched and
depleted sources (Sasada et al., 1997). Recently, Bell
(2002) advocated a plume model for the genesis of
alkaline–carbonatites rocks on the basis of several
criteria such as; (i) similarity in isotopic compositions
between OIBs and many carbonatites, (ii) the prim-
itive nature of the noble gas data from some
carbonatites, and (iii) the temporal and spatial
relationships of carbonatites and associated silicate
rocks with CFBs.
Many carbonatites worldwide contain mantle Nd
and Sr isotopic compositions that are similar to those
obtained for the Sung Valley carbonatites in this study.
Bell (1998) has reviewed the isotopic compositions of
the associated silicate rocks and suggested that
probably more than one mantle source is responsible
for their genesis. Tilton and Bell (1994) have noticed
that b200 Ma carbonatite complexes contain isotopic
ratios that lie between HIMU and EM-I. On the basis
of Nd and Sr isotopic signatures, similar results are
also obtained for the Kola Peninsula (Kramm and
Kogarko, 1994), East Africa (Bell and Blenkinsop,
1989; Bell and Simonetti, 1996; Kalt et al., 1997) and
the Deccan Alkaline Province (Simonetti et al., 1995,
1998) alkaline–carbonatite complexes. These studies
also emphasize the isotopically heterogeneous nature
of subcontinental mantle and that some of the isotopic
diversity can be explained by plume–lithosphere
interaction. A two-stage model is proposed to explain
the isotopic variations in many carbonatite complexes,
particularly East African (Bell and Simonetti, 1996).
This model suggests that metasomatizing agents with
HIMU-like signatures may metasomatize the subcon-
tinental lithosphere to variable degrees creating a
heterogeneous metasomatized mantle. Simonetti et al.
(1998) proposed that the large variations in isotopic
compositions in the carbonatite complexes might
result from the interaction of a mantle plume with
continental lithosphere. Recently, Bell and Tilton
(2001) suggested that HIMU and EM-I mantle
components are also present beneath the African
continent and most East African Rift carbonatites
originate predominantly from mixtures between these
two mantle end-members.
The isotopic data of the present study clearly
suggest a mantle signature for the carbonatites
whereas most of the silicate rocks require the involve-
ment of multiple reservoirs, such as mixing of HIMU
and enriched mantle (e.g. EM-II) components; close
to FOZO model. For comparison, the Sr and Nd
isotopic data obtained in this study for the Sung
Valley samples are plotted together with Kerguelen
Island OIBs and Rajmahal tholeiites (Michard et al.,
1986; Dosso et al., 1988; Storey et al., 1988, 1992;
Mahoney et al., 1983, 1995; see Fig. 8). A good
match of the isotopic compositions between these
rocks is observed suggesting a similar source for the
Kerguelen OIBs and the Sung Valley carbonatites
(also see Fig. 7b). A Kerguelen plume origin has been
proposed for these basalts (Kent et al., 1997, 2002;
Mahoney et al., 1992; Kent, 1995; Coffin et al., 2002;
Duncan, 2002) and it is possible that the same plume
is responsible for the Rajmahal–Sylhet continental
flood basalts and alkaline magmatism in the Shillong
Plateau of India (cf. Veena et al., 1998; Ray et al.,
1999). The isotopic evidence presented above com-
bined with the spatial and temporal distribution of this
magmatism (see Table 6) suggests a genetic link
between the ca. 107–115 Ma alkaline–carbonatite
complexes in the NE India with the Kerguelen Plume.
R.K. Srivastava et al. / Lithos 81 (2005) 33–54 49
Based on the similarity in emplacement ages for
basalts from the Kerguelen Plateau, Broken Ridge,
Naturaliste Plateau, Bunbury and Rajmahal–Sylhet
Igneous Province and plate reconstructions Kent et
al. (2002) have concluded that eruption of Rajmahal
basalts and Elan’s Bank separation from eastern
India can be explained by interaction between the
Kerguelen hotspot and a spreading ridge located
close to the eastern India margin at ~120 Ma.
Spatial and temporal relationships between Rajmahal
basaltic eruptions and alkaline magmatism of the
Shillong Plateau (Table 6) suggest common link to
the Kerguelen Plume activity.
6.1. Genesis
There are three popular models for the genesis of
carbonatite magmas and their association with alka-
line silicate rocks (Le Bas, 1981; Gittins, 1989;
Bailey, 1993). Carbonatite magma is the product of
(i) fractional crystallization of primary silicate mag-
mas, normally carbonatite nephelinite (M-1), (ii) an
immiscible liquid that separates from a fractionated
silicate magma of nephelinitic/phonolitic composition
(M-2) and (iii) derived directly from low-degree
melting of a carbonated mantle peridotite (M-3).
There is a basic difference between M-1/M-2 and
M-3. Genetic relationship between carbonatites and
associated silicate rocks can be established in M-1
and M-2, whereas M-3 does not show any relation-
ship between these rocks.
Srivastava and Sinha (2004) have discussed these
models in the context of the Sung Valley carbonatites
and proposed that M-3 model is most consistent with
the origin of these rocks. The geochemical and
isotopic data presented in this study also supports
this hypothesis. On the basis of experimental work,
Hamilton et al. (1989) have provided partition
coefficient data for trace elements, particularly Ba
and La, between carbonatite and silicate melts during
the immiscibility process. They have shown that the
Ba/La ratio should be higher in an immiscible
carbonate liquid relative to associated silicate liquid
under almost any temperature and pressure, irrespec-
tive of whether the parental silicate was nephelinite or
phonolite. From the Mg# versus Ba/La plot (Fig. 3h),
it is observed that the majority of the silicate rocks
have higher Ba/La ratios than the carbonate samples.
Therefore, a liquid immiscibility origin for the
carbonatite magma is untenable.
On the other hand, experimental studies on
peridotite–CO2 clearly demonstrate that primary
carbonatite magmas can be generated at depths greater
than ~70 km (~25 kbar) (Wyllie and Huang, 1976;
Wallace and Green, 1988; Eggler, 1978, 1989; Wyllie,
1989; Ryabachikove et al., 1989; Thibault et al., 1992;
Dalton and Wood, 1993; Sweeney, 1994; Dalton and
Presnall, 1998; Lee and Wyllie, 1998; Wyllie and Lee,
1998). These experiments suggest that on rising,
primary carbonate magma, retaining equilibrium with
mantle lherzolite, will react, crystallize and release
CO2 vapour at depths of ~70 km, increasing
clinopyroxene/orthopyroxene in the rock. Given
sufficient magma, lherzolite can be converted into
wehrlite by this decarbonation reaction (Wyllie and
Lee, 1998). Wyllie and Lee (1998) further state that at
shallower depths, wehrlite can coexist with carbonate
magma relatively enriched in Ca/Mg. This melt might
dissolve an adequate amount of olivine and pyroxene
to provide Al, Fe and Si necessary for crystallization
of silicate minerals. These experiments (Wallace and
Green, 1988; Sweeney, 1994) explain that this melt
contains appreciable amount of alkalies (5–7%). Due
to low viscosity, this melt moves upward and interacts
with the peridotite to form metasomatic clinopyroxene
and olivine, which progressively metasomatizes the
lherzolite to alkaline wehrlite and release CO2 fluids.
Continued metasomatic process may form ultrabasic
alkaline silicate magma of melilitic to nephelinitic