Empirical Analysis of Traffic Sensor Data Surrounding a Bottleneck on a German Autobahn. Robert L. Bertini Steven Hansen Portland State University Klaus Bogenberger BMW Group TRB Annual Meeting January 10, 2005
Jan 29, 2016
Empirical Analysis of Traffic Sensor Data Surrounding a Bottleneck on a German Autobahn.
Robert L. BertiniSteven HansenPortland State University
Klaus BogenbergerBMW Group
TRB Annual MeetingJanuary 10, 2005
2
Introduction.Objectives.
Empirical analysis of features of traffic dynamics and driver behavior on a German autobahn.
Understand details of bottleneck formation and dissipation.
Improved travel time estimation and forecasting: Traffic management Traveler information Driver assistance systems.
Contribute to improved traffic flow models and freeway operational strategies.
3
Background.
Previous empirical research (U.S., Canada, Germany) Active bottleneck definition:
Queue upstream Unrestricted traffic downstream
Temporally and spatially variable, static and dynamic, merges and diverges.
Activation/deactivation times. Bottleneck outflow features and possible triggers. Opportunity to compare with previous findings using data
from German freeways.
Queued Unqueued
Bottleneck
D e te c to rs
4
Study Area.Data.
14-km section of northbound A9, Munich 17 dual loop detector stations (labeled 280–
630) One-minute counts & average speeds
Cars Trucks
Six days in June–July 2002 Focus on June 27, 2002
Clear weather Variable speed limits and traffic information
(VMS)
630
5
Methodology.Analysis Tools.
Cumulative curves (Newell, Cassidy & Windover): Vehicle count Average speed
Transformations to heighten visual resolution: Oblique axis Horizontal shift with vehicle conservation
Retain lowest level of resolution (one-minute) Identify bottleneck activations and deactivations.
6
Speeds Northbound A9June 27, 2002
630
7
Speeds Northbound A9June 27, 2002
1
8
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Station 380
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
Station 380 + Off Ramp
-50
50
150
250
350
450
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time
420
390
380off
630
9
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 380–390–420
-50
50
150
250
350
450
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time @ station 420
N(x
,t)
- q
0t
420
390
380off
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
Station 420 + On Ramp
Station 390
Station 380 + Off Ramp
Time630
10
-50
50
150
250
350
450
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time @ station 420
N(x
,t)
- q
0t
420
390
380off
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
15:21@ Station 390
15:21@ Station 380
Flow
Reduction
@380
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 380–390–420
Time630
11
380
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30
Time
15:21
89 km/h
70 km/h
V(3
80,t
)-b
0t′,
b0=
3300
km
/hr2
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Station 380 Speed
630
12
-50
50
150
250
350
450
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time @ station 420
N(x
,t)
- q
0t
420
390
380off
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
15:24@ Station 420
15:21@ Station 390
15:21@ Station 380
Flow
Reduction
@380
380
55200
55400
55600
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30
Time
15:2189
70
V(3
80,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
3300
km
/hr2
V(3
90,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
4335
km
/hr2
390
98120
98170
98220
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30Time
15:21
80 41
420
95010
95060
95110
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30Time
V(4
20,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
4850
km
/hr2
15:2492
65
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 380–390–420
Time630
13
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
630
540
29400
29600
29800
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45
Time
V(5
40,
t)-b
0t′,
b0=
4550
km
/hr2
15:349739
560
36420
36520
36620
15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00
Time
V(5
60,
t)-b
0t′,
b0=
3550
km
/hr2
15:4183 43
580
34180
34280
34380
34480
15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00
Time
V(5
80,
t)-b
0t′,
b0=
3650
km
/hr2
15:4287 43
600
32400
32500
32600
32700
15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00
Time
630
41450
41650
41850
15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00 16:05 16:10 16:15
Time
V(6
00,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
3450
km
/hr2
15:47
72 38
V(6
30,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
3100
km
/hr2
15:5893 20
14
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
15:21
15:24
15:34
15:4115:42
15:47
15:58 630
1
540
29400
29600
29800
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45
Time
V(5
40,
t)-b
0t′,
b0=
4550
km
/hr2
15:349739
560
36420
36520
36620
15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00
Time
V(5
60,
t)-b
0t′,
b0=
3550
km
/hr2
15:4183 43
580
34180
34280
34380
34480
15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00
Time
V(5
80,
t)-b
0t′,
b0=
3650
km
/hr2
15:4287 43
600
32400
32500
32600
32700
15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00
Time
630
41450
41650
41850
15:45 15:50 15:55 16:00 16:05 16:10 16:15
Time
V(6
00,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
3450
km
/hr2
15:47
72 38
V(6
30,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
3100
km
/hr2
15:5893 20
15
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time
N(x
,t)
- q
0t
380
350
340
320
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
Station 350
Station 320 + Off-Ramp
Station 340
Station 380 + On-Ramp
Time @ station 380
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 320–340–350–380
Time630
16
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time
N(x
,t)
- q
0t
380
350
340
320
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
15:21@ Station 380
Flow Reduction@380
Time @ station 380
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 320–340–350–380
Time630
17
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
14:45 14:50 14:55 15:00 15:05 15:10 15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45 15:50
Time
N(x
,t)
- q
0t
380
350
340
320
N(x,t)-q 0t′,
q0=
51
70
ve
h/h
r
15:23@ Station 350
15:27@ Station 320
15:26@ Station 340
15:21@ Station 380
Flow Reduction@380
Time @ station 380
350
40500
40600
40700
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30Time
15:23
84
84
V(3
50,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
4200
km
/hr2
340
22320
22370
22420
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45
Time
15:26
99
97
V(3
40,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
5600
km
/hr2
320
19690
19740
19790
15:15 15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45
Time
15:27
105
104
V(3
20,
t)-b
0t′
, b0=
6000
km
/hr2
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 320–340–350–380
Time630
18
Active bottleneck located between detectors 380 and 390.
Activated at 15:21. Queue propagated as far as detector
630. Unrestricted traffic downstream.
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
630
19
Bottleneck ActivationJune 27, 2002
Direction of Travel
15:21 19:40
17:40
18:44
17:28
17:35
17:38
15:24
15:34
15:4115:42
15:47
15:58
19:18
1
630
20
Bottleneck ActivationJune 27, 2002
Direction of Travel
15:21 19:40
17:40
18:44
17:28
17:35
17:38
15:24
15:34
15:4115:42
15:47
15:58
19:18
1
2
630
21
Direction of Travel
15:21 19:40
17:40
18:44
17:28
17:35
17:38
15:24
15:34
15:4115:42
15:47
15:58
19:18
Bottleneck ActivationJune 27, 2002
1
2
3
630
22
Direction of Travel
15:21 19:40
17:40
18:44
17:28
17:35
17:38
15:24
15:34
15:4115:42
15:47
15:58
19:18
Bottleneck ActivationJune 27, 2002
1
2
34
630
23
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002Stations 380–390–420
N(420,t)
N(390,t)
N(380,t)0
100
15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00
Time
N(x,t)-q0t
, q0=
51
78
ve
h/h
r
630
24
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
N(420,t)
N(390,t)
N(380,t)0
100
15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00
Time
N(x,t)-q0t
, q0=
51
78
ve
h/h
r
15:2
1 17:3
5
17:4
0
18:4
5
19:1
8
1
630
25
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
N(380,t)0
100
15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00
Time
N(x,t)-q0t
, q0=
51
78
ve
h/h
r
15:2
1 17:3
5
17:4
0
18:4
5
19:1
8
1
630
26
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
N(380,t)0
100
15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00
Time
N(x,t)-q0t
, q0=
51
78
ve
h/h
r
15:2
1 17:3
5
17:4
0
18:4
5
19:1
8
5510
vph
5370 vph
1
630
27
Bottleneck Activation June 27, 2002
N(380,t)0
100
15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00
Time
N(x,t)-q0t
, q0=
51
78
ve
h/h
r
15:2
1 17:3
5
17:4
0
18:4
5
19:1
8
5510
vph
5370 vph
5410 vph
1 4
630
28
Bottleneck Activation Northbound A9Outflow Summary at 380
Day
Date
Pre-
Queue Flow
Pre-Queue
Standard Deviation
Bottleneck
Outflow Duration
Bottleneck Outflow
Bottleneck Outflow
Standard Deviation
Flow Drop
Wed 6/27/2002 5510 10.53 2:13 5370 5.8 -3% 6/27/2002 0:33 5410 6.5
Thu 6/28/2002 5800 11.22 1:41 5545 6.3 -4% 6/28/2002 0:55 5266 6.3 6/28/2002 0:30 5359 4.6 6/28/2002 1:46 5393 6.8
Mon 7/2/2002 5972 5.58 1:34 5177 6.2 -13% Tue 7/3/2002 5835 8.31 0:11 5485 4.9 -6%
7/3/2002 1:40 5017 5.2 Wed 7/4/2002 3:30 5551 6.8 Thu 7/5/2002 5527 9.43 1:22 5429 7.0 -2%
Mean: 5620 5370 -5% Standard Deviation: 320 160
630
29
Bottleneck Activation Northbound A9On-Ramp DynamicsJune 27, 2002 Station 420
2280 veh/hour
2630
1830 2370
2660 (+12%)
18502330
2630
15:16
15:20
15:2
1@
390
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00
Time
N(4
20 o
n r
amp
,t)
- q
0t'
630
30
Bottleneck Activation Northbound A9Station 420 Truck Flow Dynamics June 27, 2002Station 420 Trucks
0
50
100
150
14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00
Shoulder Trucks (q0=220)
Median Trucks (q0=22)
Right Ramp (q0=385)
Left Ramp (qo=15)
RampRightq0=385 veh/hour
400 veh/hour
750 (+190%)
15:2
1@
390
MainlineRightq0=220veh/hour
RampLeftq0=15veh/hour
MainlineLeftq0=22 veh/hour
550 320
580
320
530
260
490 330
510
230
390
240 170330
160350 (+120%)
230
50
100
50
270 (9 trucks in 2 minutes)
24
20
3040
Trucks Only
N(x,t)-q 0t
630
31
Bottleneck 1 Activation Northbound A9Station 390 Truck Flow Dynamics June 27, 2002
0
50
100
150
14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00
Shoulder Trucks
Center Trucks
Median Truck
N(x,t)-q 0t
Shoulderq0=560 veh/hour
Centerq0=65 veh/hour
Medianq0=15 veh/hour
630 veh/hour 400
740
470670
770
420820 (+95%)
570
740
220
20200
80210
100 210 (+120%)
15:2
1@
390
14080
180
2070
20180 (6 trucks in 2 minutes, +680%)
7030
Trucks Only
630
32
Conclusion.
Method for diagnosing active bottlenecks. 11 bottleneck activations on 6 days at one location. Measured bottleneck outflows appear stable:
Day to day (contrary to other research) Preceded by queueing or not
Pre-queue flows measurably higher than bottleneck outflow.
Precursors to queue formation some distance downstream of merge: Rise in on-ramp flow (total) Surges in truck counts
Research continuing at this and other sites in Germany.
33
Thank you for your attention.
AcknowledgementsBMW GroupOregon Engineering Technology Industry CouncilPortland State UniversitySteven Boice