Top Banner
COST ALLOCATION EMBA Presentation November 17,2012
24

EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve: Common Costs Joint Costs.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

COST ALLOCATION

EMBA PresentationNovember 17,2012

Page 2: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Cost Allocations Involve:

Common Costs Joint Costs

Page 3: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Purposes of Cost Allocation To provide information for economic

decision making To motivate managers To justify costs for reimbursement To measure income and use of assets

Page 4: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Criteria for Allocation of Costs

Cause and effect Benefits received Fairness or equity Ability to bear

Page 5: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Steps in Cost Allocation

Define the cost objects Accumulate common costs Choose a method for assigning costs

Page 6: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Allocation of Joint Costs

Sales value at split-off Physical measure Estimated net realizable value

Page 7: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Physical Units Method

Select White Knotty Total

Board feet 450,000 750,000 300,000 1,500,000

Weighting 30% 50% 20% 100%

Allocation of joint costs 90,000$ 150,000$ 60,000$ 300,000$

Separate costs 60,000 90,000 15,000 165,000

Total costs 150,000$ 240,000$ 75,000$ 465,000$

Cost per board foot 0.33$ 0.32$ 0.25$ 0.31$

Page 8: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Sales Value at Spin Off Method

Select White Knotty Total

(450,000 x..35)(750,000 x.40)(300,000 x .19) 157,500$ 300,000$ 75,000$ 532,500$

Weighting 30% 56% 14% 100%

Allocation of joint costs 88,732$ 169,014$ 42,254$ 300,000$

Separate costs 60,000 90,000 15,000 165,000

Total costs 148,732$ 259,014$ 57,254$ 465,000$

Cost per board foot 0.33$ 0.35$ 0.19$ 0.31$

Page 9: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Net Realizable Value Method

Select White Knotty Total

(405,000 x.40)(675,000 x.55)(270,000 x .25) 162,000$ 371,250$ 67,500$ 600,750$

Less separate costs 60,000 90,000 15,000 165,000

NRV at split off 102,000$ 281,250$ 52,500$ 435,750$

Weighting 23% 65% 12% 100%

Allocated joint costs 70,224$ 193,632$ 36,145$ 300,000$

Add separate costs 60,000 90,000 15,000 165,000

Total costs 130,224$ 283,632$ 51,145$ 465,000$

Cost per board foot 0.29$ 0.38$ 0.17$ 0.31$

Page 10: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Method Select White

Knotty Total

Physical units .33 .32 .25 .31

Split off .33 .35 .19 .31

NRV .29 .38 .17 .31

Comparison of the Three Methods

Page 11: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

So, which is the best

method?

Page 12: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

None . . .

they are all arbitrary

Page 13: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Pros and Cons

Physical units – is easy to calculate Split-off – may not be appropriate if

there is no market at the split-off point

NRV – assumes that the greater the end sales dollars, the better it can bear the joint cost

Page 14: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Allocation of Common Costs Direct Method Step-down Method Reciprocal Method

Page 15: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Direct Method Allocations

Head Percent Hours PercentAdmin/HR - - - - Information Services - - - - Government 40 0.53333 3,000 0.33333 Corporate 35 0.46667 6,000 0.66667

Total 75 1.00000 9,000 1.00000

Administrative Information Services

Page 16: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Direct Method

A/HR IS GOVT CORP

Costs $ 600,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 0 $ 0

All A/HR:(.53333, .46667 ) (600,000) 0 320,000 280,000

All IS:(.33333, .66667) 0(2,400,000) 800,000

1,600,000

Totals $ 0 $ 0 $1,120,000$1,880,000

Page 17: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Step Down Allocations

Head Percent Hours PercentAdmin/HR - - - - Information Services 25 0.25000 - - Government 40 0.40000 3,000 0.33333 Corporate 35 0.35000 6,000 0.66667

Total 100 1.00000 9,000 1.00000

Administrative Information Services

Page 18: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Step Down Method – A/HR First

A/HR IS GOVT CORP

Cost $ 600,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 0 $ 0

A/HR

(.25, .40, .35) (600,000) 150,000 240,000210,000

IS

(.33333. .66667) 0(2,550,000) 850,000 1,700,000

Totals $ 0 $ 0 $1,090,000$1,910,000

Page 19: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Reciprocal Allocations

Head Percent Hours PercentAdmin/HR - - 1,000 0.10000 Information Services 25 0.25000 - - Government 40 0.40000 3,000 0.30000 Corporate 35 0.35000 6,000 0.60000

Total 100 1.00000 10,000 1.00000

Administrative Information Services

Page 20: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Reciprocal Method A/HR IS GOVT CORP

Costs $ 600,000 $2,400,000

A/HR (.25, .40, .35) (861,538) 215,385 344,615

301,538

IS (.10, .30, .60) 261,538 (2,615,385) 784,615

1,569,231

Totals $ 0 $ 0 $1,129,230 $1,870,769

A = 600,000 + .10 ISIS = 2,400,000 + .25 AIS = 2,400,000 +1 50,000 + .025 IS.9750 IS = 2,550,000IS = 2,615,385A = 600,000+.10 (2,615,385)A = 861,538

Page 21: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Comparison of Results

Method Government Corporate

Direct $1,120,000 $1,880,000

Stepdown Adm first $1,098,000

$1,910,000

Stepdown IT first $1,128,000

$1,892,000

Reciprocal $1,129,230 $1,870,769

Page 22: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Pros and Cons of Methods

Direct method – easy but ignores how support departments use each other

Step down – widely accepted but requires designation of a “first” department

Reciprocal – most accurate but not well understood or widely used

Page 23: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Summary

Reason for cost allocations Allocating joint costs Allocating common costs

Page 24: EMBA Presentation November 17,2012. Cost Allocations Involve:  Common Costs  Joint Costs.

Copyright by Frank Ilett, 2012