Top Banner
Emanuel Gruengar d Paradigms of Distant Lear ning 1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design
20

Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

1

Paradigms of

Distributed Education

Prof. Emanuel Gruengard

Shenkar College of Engineering & Design

Page 2: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

What is DE?

Tutor and Student are Separated by Space and possibly also by Time

Page 3: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

3

DE FeaturesDE Features

•A learner centered approach to education

•Creates high quality and cost effective instruction

•Integration of a number of technologies: - Asynchronous and Synchronous

Page 4: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

4

Why DE Why DE ?? The Student View The Student View

•Geographical Boundaries are Falling Away

•Demand for Flexible Learning Opportunities

•Opportunity for High Quality and Cost Effective Instruction

Page 5: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

5

•Maintain and Grow Enrolments

•Collaboration and Sharing

•A Catalyst for Creating New Teaching

and Learning Environments

•Potential to Generate Revenue•Emergence of Virtual Universities

and Competition

Why DE Why DE ?? The College View The College View

Page 6: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

6

•Local class (not a DE!)

•Asynchronous Learning (e.g. Correspondence Universities)

•Synchronous Learning (e.g. Videoconferencing)

•Synchronous and Asynchronous (e.g. Network Learning)

Major ParadigmsMajor Paradigms

Page 7: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

7

LocalLocal ClassClass prospros andand conscons

• All facilities are available• In presence tutoring• High level of interaction ?

• Costly, Scheduled Time, Travel• Quality of instruction ?• Problematic students

Page 8: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

8

Asynchronous Asynchronous LearningLearning

Time Delayed delivery of material:

•Distribution Based

Books, Broadcasts, TV, Movies

•Delivery through the Internet

Discussion groups, eMail, WWW

sites

Page 9: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Correspondence Correspondence SchoolsSchools

Used by Open Universities

Page 10: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

10

Correspondence School Correspondence School prospros andand conscons

• No Travel Time and Costs• Learn at your Pace• Learn while Working

• Social Isolation• Hard to get Tutoring• Needs a lot of Motivation

Page 11: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

11

Real Time presence of tutor and students:

•Frontal Lectures, Seminars, Groups

•Videoconferencing

•On-line Internet broadcast

Synchronous Synchronous LearningLearning

Page 12: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

12

•Courses are delivered on and off campus•Use technologies such as Audiographics, Videoconference, Satellite Broadcasting•Easiest transition from local•Relies on remote learning centers due to

need for specialized equipment

Classroom at a distanceClassroom at a distance

Page 13: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

13

Remote Classroom - 1Remote Classroom - 1

Video Conferencing - Full Interaction

Page 14: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

14

Remote Classroom - 2Remote Classroom - 2

Satellites - Partial Interaction. Many Locations

Page 15: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

15

Remote class Remote class prospros and and conscons

Hardly interactive (satellites)

Highly Interactive (VC)

Needs Scheduled Time

Low Travel Costs and Time

Efficient use of Lecturer Time

Page 16: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

16

Network Learning -1Network Learning -1

Prerecorded - Asynchronous

Live Broadcast - Synchronous

Uses regular Internet Communication

Page 17: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

17

•Courses offered on campus and off campus

•Requires access to Computers (home, labs)with Internet access

•Requires Software Installation

Networked Learning - 2Networked Learning - 2

Page 18: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

18

• Both scheduled and unscheduled • No Travel • Pick the best instructor (?)• Multiple media offerings• Isolation & motivation• Still(?) suffers from Bandwidth

Network Network prospros and and conscons

Page 19: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

19

Implementation ProblemsImplementation Problems

•Instructors are not recognized & rewarded•A Pedagogical shift is required•Effective DE is complex•Additional load on personal•Problems with Ownership and Copyrights•Might require Substantial start up Funding

Page 20: Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.

Emanuel Gruengard

Paradigms of Distant Learning

20

Thank you!