Top Banner
Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D. communications, reputation & brand management Reputation & Brand Management: The Role of Corporate Communications in Building and Retaining Value Public Relations Leadership Forum Atlanta, Georgia January 26, 2006 Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D. [email protected] The information and slides in this presentation are copyrighted materials and should not be copied, duplicated or used without the expressed written consent of the author or without appropriate reference. Elliot
22
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Reputation & Brand Management: The Role of Corporate

Communications in Building and Retaining Value

Public Relations Leadership ForumAtlanta, GeorgiaJanuary 26, 2006

Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

[email protected]

The information and slides in this presentation are copyrighted materials and should not be copied, duplicated or used without the expressed written consent of the author or without appropriate reference.

Elliot Schreiber 2004©

Page 2: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Situation

• There has been a steady erosion in corporate credibility and trust;

• All companies have been impacted by corporate scandals, whether or not they have done anything wrong;

• Trust is the underlying “currency” in the market economy;

• Without trust, investors stay on the sideline, customers do not buy, employees don’t join, etc.;

• Companies will not regain trust through compliance and governance alone.

Elliot S. Schreiber©

Page 3: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Key Points

• Companies with good reputations have greater financial success, they attract and keep the best talent, the attract and keep better customers, and their cost of capital is less;

• Good reputation gives companies greater “resiliency” to weather “storms” of negative publicity;

• Companies cannot succeed long-term by focusing only on their financial success—they must balance the needs and interests of a variety of stakeholders;

• Reputation management should be a strategic process that guides the corporation—an “umbrella” strategy unifying activities of the corporation and its business units;

• Reputation management goes to the heart of the debate about the theory of the firm—whether it is a purely economic organization, or if it is a social, economic and political organization.

Page 4: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tApproaches to Reputation &

Brand Management

• Marketing/Communications Approach: focuses on identity and image and how company represents itself to external stakeholders. Focuses on identity, “image” and messages;

• Holistic Approach: focuses on a wide list of internal and external stakeholders and emphases the importance of coordinated strategy to manage reputation.

Elliot Schreiber 2004©

Page 5: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Brand & Reputation Defined

• For organizations, both Brand and Reputation can be defined similarly:

the perception by a given stakeholder that a product, service or organization

possesses certain attributes;

• A good reputation occurs when the organization’s attributes (its value proposition) coincide with the needs and interests of key stakeholders better than the value propositions available from competitive offerings.

Elliot S. Schreiber 2004©

Page 6: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Conceptual Model of Reputation©

Company Attributes

Stakeholder Values

X Experience

Elliot S. Schreiber 2004©

Reputation =

Time

Where: Company Attributes = Organization’s value proposition (attributes) to

stakeholders Stakeholder Values = The importance of the company’s attributes to

stakeholders Experience = How stakeholders perceive they have been treated by the organization and whether its Promise is valid

Page 7: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Determinants of Reputation

Source: Fombrun & Van Riel, 2004

Reputation

SocialResponsibility Familiarity/

Favorability

Products & Services

Vision &Leadership

FinancialPerformance

WorkplaceEnvironment

Page 8: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Reputation is a Differentiator of Value

• Employees – Attracts and keeps talent– Builds pride – Makes jobs more

attractive and motivates employees

• Customers– Attracts new customers– Encourages repeat

purchases– Builds market share– Opens new market

opportunities• Investors

– Lowers cost of capital– Attracts new investments

• Media– Generates more positive

coverage• Government

– Enhances support– Minimizes chance of

enhanced scrutiny• Communities

– Builds support– Minimizes concerns

Elliot Schreiber 2004©

Page 9: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Factors that Affect Reputation

• Visibility• Honesty• Keeping Promises• Transparency• Clarity• Good communications• Consistency• Experience• Expectations

• Continuity of words and actions (“Walking the talk”)

• Good or bad activities of competitors

• Political or business climate

• Public or social issues

• “Crusades” by stakeholder groups

Elliot Schreiber 2004©

Page 10: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Reputation Builds Financial Success

Reputation Rating Low 60.1 High 80.2

1 Year Measures

Cost of Goods Sold 60.8 49.0Growth in Employment 2.8% 6.9%Market to Book Value 0.81 1.1Net Margin 4.3 8.0Return on Assets 4.3% 8.4%Beta 1.07 1.11

5 Year Averages

Cash Flow to Sales 12.8 18.1Price-Earnings Ratio 21.7 32.5Return on Equity 16.8 38.4Equity as % of Total Assets 35.3 44.9Long-term Debt to Capital 29.9 24.8Quick Ratio 0.82 1.01EPS Growth 7.3 16.5Sales Per Employee $2.46M $4.55M

Source: Fombrun & Van Riel, 2004, p 78

Page 11: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tEmployee and Customer Satisfaction Drive

Financial Results

Employee Satisfaction Customer Satisfaction r =.80

r =.55

Stock Price

r = .45

Organizations included: Nortel, Ford, IBM, Xerox, 3M, Carlson, H-P, etc.

Employee & Customer Satisfaction are strongly correlated and together drive stock price,

BUT, stock price does not necessarilydrive employee & customer satisfaction

Employee & Customer Satisfaction are strongly correlated and together drive stock price,

BUT, stock price does not necessarilydrive employee & customer satisfaction

Elliot S. Schreiber©Source: Competitive Advantage through Customer Satisfaction & Excellence (CATCSE)

Page 12: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Importance of Values

• A 2005 study by the Aspen Institute and Booz Allen Hamilton of 365 international companies founds values linked to success in reputation & relationships:

Source: Strategy + Business, June 2005

Ethical behavior Concern for Employees Honesty/Openness Adaptability

98%

88% 88%

68%85%

47%42%

9%

VALUES

Financial leadersOthers

Page 13: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tWhy Reputation Needs to be a Corporate

Process

ReputationConsistent, Trustworthy Behaviors

Consistent Communications

Employee Commitment

Policies & Practices

Business Objectives

Values©Elliot Schreiber 2006

Intern

al C

on

trols

& G

ove

rna

nc

eS

take

ho

lde

r P

erce

pti

on

s

Resource Allocation

Page 14: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tThree Key Reputation Goals for All

Companies

1. Be disproportionately valued (financially, as a provider of goods and services, etc.) as a company in general and specifically against your company’s competitive set;

2. Win the talent war by establishing your company as the company with an engaged, committed and proud group of employees at all levels whose value to society is recognized by others;

3. Be recognized as a “winner” and leader within the community.

Page 15: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Primary Reputation Drivers

For Most Companies:• Quality Products & Services (including customer

service)• Quality of Organization as a place to work• Perception of the CEO and Leadership• Financial Performance

Page 16: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tIntangible Assets Increasingly Drive

Reputation

• From a strategy perspective, an asset can be defined as anything an organization possesses, or is perceived to possess, and which can be leveraged to enhance its value and success;

• Ernst & Young (2003) found that 82% of market value of S&P 500 was comprised of perception of value of intangible assets, with 15% from tangible assets;

• In 1982, intangibles comprised only 35% of the market value;

• Intangible assets are “a claim to future benefits that do not have a physical or financial component” (Lev 2001).

Elliot Schreiber 2004©

Page 17: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tSources of Organizational Value—

Types of Assets

Value

PhysicalCapital

FinancialCapital

IntellectualCapital

ReputationCapital

UniqueKnowledge

UniqueSkills

BrandEquity

StakeholderRelationships

Plants &Equipment

Net Liquid Assets

Elliot S. Schreiber ©

Ac

co

un

tin

g “

imp

ort

an

ce

Ma

rke

t “imp

orta

nce

Page 18: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Normalized Earnings

Subtract: Return on Physical Assets

Subtract: Return on Financial Assets

Capitalize: Intangible Assets

Equal: Intangibles-Driven Earnings

Past Earnings + Future Earnings

Source: Feng Gu and Baruch Lev, “Intangible Assets: Measurement, Drivers, Usefulness”, April 2001

Calculating Intangible Assets

Page 19: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Fea

r, U

nce

rtai

nty

& D

ou

bt

Complexity of Information in DecisionLow High

High

Marketing & Advertising is NotAlways the Way to Build Reputation

6

Driver: Personal need & desireBrand Emphasis: ProductDemand: Short-term, basic needDemand Created by: AdvertisingValue of Corporate Reputation: LOWExamples: Coke, Pepsi,

M&Ms, Alka-Seltzer

Driver: Social AcceptanceBrand Emphasis: ProductDemand: Short to long-term Demand Created by: Advertising & product-in-use by endorsers Value of Corporate Reputation: LOW to MODERATE Examples: Air Jordan, Chanel No. 5 Martha Stewart products

Driver: Superior PerformanceBrand Emphasis: Ingredient BrandingDemand: Moderate to Long-termDemand Created by: Integrated Communications focused on technical differentiationImportance of Corporate Reputation:HIGHExamples: Intel’s Pentium Chip, Scotch Tape by 3M, pharmaceutical ingredients

Driver: Personal or Family SecurityBrand Emphasis: MasterbrandDemand: Long-termDemand Created by: sales and Integrated communications to create referralsValue of Corporate Reputation:

VERY HIGHExamples: GE, IBM, Bank of America

Elliot S. Schreiber ©

Page 20: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

t

Creating an “Umbrella” Strategy

Corporate Reputation Goal

Strategy & Vision

Objective 2Business Units

various business & functional activitiesaimed at reputation

Values

Stakeholders

Primary

Secondary &Intermediary

Value

©Elliot Schreiber 2006

Page 21: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tOthers Need to Change to Make

Reputation Management a Success

• Strategic Planning needs to focus on leading and integrating plans of all units and not just providing strategy “roll ups”

• Human Resources needs to move from benefits & compensation to employee motivation and “work brand” leaders

• Finance needs to fully recognize value of intangible assets

• Marketing needs to more fully understand how reputation is built and not rely on advertising

Page 22: Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

E

llio

t S

. S

ch

reib

er,

Ph

.D.

co

mm

un

icat

ion

s,

rep

uta

tio

n &

bra

nd

man

ag

emen

tWhat Corporate Communications Must Do to

Make Reputation Management a Success

• Focus on outcomes, not outputs—stop focusing on the things that you do and focus instead on how to move the “needle” in the right direction;

• Lead the analysis of the attributes of reputation, both inside-out and outside-in;

• Focus on strategy, not on implementation (message development, media relations, etc.);

• Recognize importance of stakeholder relationships to build reputation;

• Continually monitor and interpret the internal and external environment and help keep the organization’s attributes current;

• Understand and advocate for the value proposition desired by key stakeholders;

• Be the catalyst for an “umbrella” strategy that integrates all of the activities aimed at key stakeholders;

• Be the organizational catalyst and change agent, when needed.

Elliot S. Schreiber©