Top Banner
Elementary Crowding and Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee Capacity Committee (ECCC) (ECCC) Meeting #5 Meeting #5 October 22, 2007 October 22, 2007
13

Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Elementary Crowding and Elementary Crowding and Capacity CommitteeCapacity Committee

(ECCC)(ECCC)

Meeting #5Meeting #5

October 22, 2007October 22, 2007

Page 2: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Meeting AgendaMeeting Agenda

7:00 Comments from Dr. Smith

7:15 Housekeeping Details

7:30 Draft Option from Long Branch

8:15 Small Group Conversations

8:45 Adjourn

Next Meeting: October 29

Page 3: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Hybrid Option for Alleviating Crowding at Tuckahoe and McKinley

• Grandfather all currently enrolled kids

• Discount all dual enrollees

• Move Tuckahoe’s pre-K class

• Move Nottingham’s Interlude program to a more central location

• Move Planning Unit 1609 (29 kids) to Glebe

• Move Life Skills classes from Glebe

• Freeze incoming transfers at Tuckahoe, McKinley, Glebe, and Nottingham

• Designate 15 seats (5 each at ASF, ATS, Key) for “overcrowded schools” Allot those seats for 2008 to overcrowded schools (schools in excess of

100% capacity) currently Tuckahoe and McKinley

• Designate Long Branch as the alternative to Key for all of Woodbury Park

• Designate Long Branch – instead of Ashlawn – as a NCLB receiving school

Page 4: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Background Material from Background Material from Previous MeetingsPrevious Meetings

Page 5: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

• LangstonLangston– Shared facility with the CountyShared facility with the County– APS has 10 “large” classrooms, 6 are 700 sf, on 2APS has 10 “large” classrooms, 6 are 700 sf, on 2ndnd

and 3and 3rdrd floors floors– High School Continuation enrollment as of 9/30: High School Continuation enrollment as of 9/30:

9494– County program includes 4 PreK Head Start County program includes 4 PreK Head Start

Rooms, Multi Purpose Room, Senior Program, Rooms, Multi Purpose Room, Senior Program, Teen Center, Community CenterTeen Center, Community Center

Langston BuildingLangston Building

Page 6: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Reed BuildingReed Building

• Construction schedule: January 2008 – Summer 2009Construction schedule: January 2008 – Summer 2009• The Children’s School/Integration StationThe Children’s School/Integration Station

– 13 classrooms for 0-5 year olds13 classrooms for 0-5 year olds– No cafeteria, art, music, specialsNo cafeteria, art, music, specials– Relocating program would require 13 classrooms Relocating program would require 13 classrooms

(290 student capacity in another APS facility)(290 student capacity in another APS facility)• Teen ParentingTeen Parenting

– 10 classrooms, 6 are 720 sf or smaller10 classrooms, 6 are 720 sf or smaller– Majority of classrooms on 2Majority of classrooms on 2ndnd floor floor– 2 infant care rooms2 infant care rooms– 60 students, 18 infants60 students, 18 infants

Page 7: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Interlude ProgramInterlude Program

• Countywide programCountywide program• 2 classrooms and quiet space, capacity of 20 2 classrooms and quiet space, capacity of 20

studentsstudents• Integrated into elementary program at NottinghamIntegrated into elementary program at Nottingham• Must be located in an elementary schoolMust be located in an elementary school

Page 8: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Planning UnitsPlanning UnitsTUCKAHOE PLANNING UNITS - SCHOOLS ATTENDING

PLANNING_UNIT TOTAL # ASF ATS ASHL BARRETT CLARE DREW GLEBE JAMES KEY LONG B MCKIN NOTTING TAYLOR TUCKA OTHER

1601 27 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 01602 128 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 117 11603 44 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 37 01604 33 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 11605 58 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 51 01606 98 0 3 2 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 1 82 11607 79 0 10 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 61 21608 61 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 50 31609 37 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 29 11610 23 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 01611 23 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 11612 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 21613 40 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 21614 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

TUCKAHOE PLANNING UNITS - DEMOGRAPHICSPLANNING_UNIT TOTAL # PREK K 1 2 3 4 5 WHITE BLACK HISP ASIAN ENGLISH SPANISH OTHER

1601 27 2 3 4 6 4 4 4 24 0 2 0 25 1 01602 128 5 22 30 14 21 17 19 111 1 2 12 120 0 01603 44 4 7 6 7 8 6 6 38 2 0 3 44 0 01604 33 1 2 9 5 3 8 5 30 0 0 3 32 0 01605 58 2 12 8 9 11 8 8 48 1 2 5 58 0 01606 98 4 10 22 10 20 10 22 81 1 5 10 97 0 01607 79 8 16 12 11 8 13 11 55 3 8 11 70 8 01608 61 2 11 10 10 8 9 11 55 0 2 3 56 1 01609 37 0 3 5 8 6 4 11 28 3 2 4 33 2 01610 23 1 4 8 3 1 2 4 16 0 1 5 19 0 01611 23 2 2 6 1 2 7 3 20 0 1 2 22 1 01612 11 2 2 0 3 1 3 0 9 0 0 1 10 0 01613 40 3 4 11 4 11 3 4 34 0 0 5 37 0 01614 5 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 5 0 0

Page 9: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

MOCK Analysis – Move three Plan MOCK Analysis – Move three Plan Units from Tuckahoe to GlebeUnits from Tuckahoe to Glebe

Page 10: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Feasibility Analysis of MOCK Feasibility Analysis of MOCK ScenarioScenario

Page 11: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Feasibility Analysis of MOCK Feasibility Analysis of MOCK ScenarioScenario

Page 12: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

Capacity UtilizationCapacity UtilizationNo dual enrollmentNo dual enrollment

• 60.1% - Abingdon60.1% - Abingdon• 99.6% - ASF99.6% - ASF• 96.4% - ATS96.4% - ATS• 91.3% - Ashlawn91.3% - Ashlawn• 74.2% - Barcroft74.2% - Barcroft• 86.4% - Barrett86.4% - Barrett• 74.8% - Campbell74.8% - Campbell• 84.7% - Carlin Springs84.7% - Carlin Springs• 89.1% - Claremont89.1% - Claremont• 94.6% - Drew94.6% - Drew• 99.7% - Glebe99.7% - Glebe

• 83.6% - Henry83.6% - Henry• 56.8% - Hoffman-Boston56.8% - Hoffman-Boston• 95.3% - Jamestown95.3% - Jamestown• 93.3% - Key93.3% - Key• 84.6% - Long Branch84.6% - Long Branch• 102% - McKinley102% - McKinley• 99.5% - Nottingham99.5% - Nottingham• 80.0% - Oakridge80.0% - Oakridge• 80.7% - Randolph80.7% - Randolph• 94.0% - Taylor94.0% - Taylor• 116.2% - Tuckahoe116.2% - Tuckahoe

Page 13: Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.

ECCC RecommendationECCC Recommendation• Remove fourth bullet:Remove fourth bullet:

Not change choices available or admissions Not change choices available or admissions policies.policies.

Superintendent’s RecommendationSuperintendent’s Recommendation• Substitute the following language for the fourth Substitute the following language for the fourth

bullet:bullet:Not change the location, program, or Not change the location, program, or admissions procedures related to Arlington admissions procedures related to Arlington Traditional School or Drew Model School.Traditional School or Drew Model School.