Sample footer, to edit se e user guide M arket R eform Program m e O ffice Electronic Claims • It’s coming • There will be pain to get the gain • Who is your business sponsor? • If you handle claims, the way you do your job will change ECF Key Messages
37
Embed
Electronic Claims Its coming There will be pain to get the gain Who is your business sponsor? If you handle claims, the way you do your job will change.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Sample footer, to edit see user guide
Market ReformProgramme OfficeElectronic Claims
• It’s coming
• There will be pain to get the gain
• Who is your business sponsor?
• If you handle claims, the way you do your job will change
ECF Key Messages
Sample footer, to edit see user guide
Market ReformProgramme OfficeElectronic Claims
Electronic Claim File Briefing
Development and Implementation update
21st March 2006
Follow up to last update and demonstration on 1st November 2005
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 3
Electronic ClaimsAgenda
• Introduction and welcome Carl Phillips
• Status review Ian Mallery
• Broker’s view Chris Reay
• Project funding and governance Martin Dyer
• ECF & market reform Andy Brookes
• Questions and close Carl Phillips
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 4
Electronic Claims
Introduction and Welcome
Carl Phillips
Amlin
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 5
Electronic Claims
Status Review
Ian Mallery
Marlborough & ECPG
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 6
Electronic ClaimsLMA ECF Objective
• To replicate today’s file electronically
–Not a Blue Sky Claims System development
• Based on existing products
–Changes to CLASS out of scope (except look and feel)
–Work with underlying software capabilities
• Provide a base product on day 1
–To be evolved once experience gained
• Post implementation of base product
–Strategic review of on-going development– e.g. Third Party Access
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 7
Electronic ClaimsStatus todayKey Enhancements in 5 Phases
Phase 1 - See all documents in one view
Phase 2 - Leader control of file/improved searching
Phase 3 - ACORD DRI (receipt of documents)
Completed 2005
Phases 4/5 – Merged into a single phase
CLASS @ Lloyd’s data through GUI, full DRI and
Seamless link with documents in repository
MAT starts 15 May 2006 (38 days to go!)Live – mid-September
• Generating over 600 transactions electronically to date
• IUA Companies now actively participating in pilots – adding to the ground swell
• LMBC working closely with MRPO to ensure success of project
• Initial feedback from Lloyd’s Brokers has been positive – further follow ups / presentations planned for April / May
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 21
Electronic ClaimsIssues to consider
• Will there be sufficient number of market claims practitioners trained and ready to go live?
• Process issues arising from early implementations will restrict certain business classes / placing processes
• This is a significant cultural shift in how the London market will operate – are we really ready for it?
• The market continues to work together to resolve them
• This is the 1st major step along a new path
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 22
Electronic ClaimsLooking to the future
• The infrastructure has been proven – we’ve got a good base
• Essential enhancements scoped and included in the continual development plan
• Electronic claims servicing is a realistic tool for the London market
• So let’s do away with the luggage and stop walking paper around these streets!
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 23
Electronic Claims
Project Funding & Governance
Martin Dyer
St. Paul Travelers & SDG
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 24
Electronic ClaimsThe Role of the SDG
• SDG reports to LMA Market Processes Committee (MPC)
• Responsible for delivery of CLASS at Lloyd’s / ECF on behalf of Project fund providers (LMA Members)
• Tracks XIS performance against plans / budgets
• Manages changes to scope through Change Request Process
• Ensures Managing Agents are appropriately involved / informed
• Participates in Market Claims Infrastructure Project Board
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 25
Electronic ClaimsTime and Budget Summary
• On track for software delivery to process electronic claims across the Lloyd’s market
• No change to agreed USM & SCM surcharges
• Early implementation partnerships growing
• Substantial market testing and implementation tasks this year
• Will change working practices from paper to electronic for many claims practitioners
• Will not deliver everything on day one - need on-going maintenance and review of Change Request log
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 26
Electronic ClaimsImpact on Budget
• No changes to original funding arrangements
• 2006 surcharges:
– 34p USM & SCM for Repository running costs – reduction from 2005
– 19p SCM for CLASS at Lloyd’s running costs
– 25p SCM from January 2006 for repository development
– CLASS at Lloyd’s development (£597k) in three instalments
• Budget Position to the end of 2005
– Implementation, Infrastructure and Running costs £1,546,663
– Change Requests £ 365,000
– Total charges incurred £1,911,663
– Revenue from surcharges and other licence charges £2,786,259
– Surplus carried forward to 2006 £ 874,596
– CLASS running costs waived for 2005
• The project remains on budget
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 27
Electronic ClaimsFuture
• Operational electronic claims by end 2006 for brokers, Lloyd’s & IUA
• Roll out for processing new claims will continue into 2007
– Increasing pressure on any non participants
• This is just the “Base Camp” - foundation to:
– Migrate to ACORD business messages for claims
– Eliminate CLASS differences across the multiple systems
– Enable third party access e.g. loss adjusters
– Move existing claims from paper to electronic
– Offer client tracking of claims
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 28
Electronic Claims
ECF & Market Reform
Andy Brookes
Market Reform Programme Office
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 29
ECF: Key part of the London process reform programme
• Overall aim:
– A framework of standards for business processes that enables firms to deliver services efficiently to customers at a cost and level of risk comparable with other platforms
• Note:
– Any costs inherent in a subscription market must be offset to deliver this comparability.
– Any changes in business process must be managed in such a way as to avoid undermining the unique qualities/competitive advantages of the London Market.
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 30
ECF is not happening in isolation
• Claims beyond ECF
– Change requests – no system stays put
– Claims infrastructure to include IUA
– Protocols (LMP2001); Lloyd’s Claims Scheme
– Support Claims Strategy & Minimum Standards
• Integration with other reform workstreams
– Accounting & Settlement
– Contract Certainty
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 31
Integration with other workstreams
• Accounting and Settlement
– Measurement checks; A&S repository; A&S strategy for P2P
– Repository use
– London market use of ACORD DRI Standards
– P2P A&S: strategy questions for claims
• Contract Certainty
– More certain contracts = fewer coverage disputes
– Roles & responsibilities clearly defined
– Repositories….again (e.g. model wordings)
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 32
Implementation approach
• Lead implementers
• Prepare to follow:
– Commercial
– Lloyd’s performance standards
– Regulatory better MI pressure
• Sponsors; project managers
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 33
Electronic Claims
Questions & Close
Carl Phillips
Amlin
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 34
Electronic ClaimsAccess
• Can you access the internet from your desktop?
• Are you familiar with looking at messages, data and information?
–On your Personal drives or My Documents?
–On Shared or Network Drives?
–On websites?
• The Insurers’ Market Repository is just another folder of documents
–but market wide
–24/7 access from anywhere– Home, overseas, or even in the office
–controlled by CLASS security access
Mark
et
Refo
rm
Page 35
Electronic ClaimsWhat should YOU do now?
• Assess and plan for the impact on you
– How many adjusters have you got?
– How many will need access to this system?
– Can you connect to these new services?
– Who will be responsible for implementing in your agency?
– How will you ensure they are trained in CLASS and the repository?
– Are you as a leader prepared for the change of responsibility for controlling the file?