Top Banner
Election of Women • Why so much variation – across nations? – across American states?
23

Election of Women

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

liana

Election of Women. Why so much variation across nations? across American states?. Election of Women. Major changes In US Congress about 17% “big” increase post 1990 In State legislatures steady gains post 1970 little change in last 10 years frozen at about 23%. Election of Women. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Why so much variation

– across nations?

– across American states?

Page 2: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Major changes– In US Congress

• about 17%• “big” increase post 1990

– In State legislatures• steady gains post 1970• little change in last 10 years• frozen at about 23%

Page 3: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 4: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 5: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Candidate recruitment– In states, increase in # of candidates

tracked w/ increase in # of women elected

– Since 1992, pool of candidates has not increased

Page 6: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 7: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Major partisan differences– Since 1990, fewer GOP women elected

– More Dem women elected• 31% of D state legislators women• 15% of R state legislators women

– Same pattern in US Congress

Page 8: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 9: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Regional variation– Women have made major gains in some

states• New England, WA, West

– Highest = 40% in CO

– Little representation in many states• South

– lowest = 13% in SC

Page 10: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 11: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 12: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Nordic 42%– SWE 45%

• Americas 22%– CAN 22%, MEX 18%

• Europe 22%– SUI 29%, GER 33%

• Europe (n-n) 20%– RUS 14%

• Asia 19%– JAP 11%

• SubS Africa 18%

Page 13: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Questions– Why trends, why flattening?– Why partisan differences?– Why regional differences?– What effects of representation?

Page 14: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Are voters biased against women candidates?– continued sexism?

• Are there not enough viable women candidates?

Page 15: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Major factors– Party recruitment

• Is this reason for party difference?• in US, local parties

– lower office route to

• other nations– Party list placement

Page 16: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Major factors– Campaign finance

• Men and women have different networks

• Different opportunities for raising money– Women fewer opportunities to raise large sums of

money

Page 17: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Major factors– quotas

• in Constitution

• in Party rules– In Europe, left parties started quotas earlier

Page 18: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Single member vs. multi-member districts– WA, AZ....

– Voters more likely to vote for woman if also first have chance to vote for a man?

Page 19: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Cultural factors?– Scandinavia vs. rest of Europe

• Gender roles different SP, IT than SWE...

– New England vs. US South

Page 20: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Daniel Elazar’s US Political Culture thesis– Moralistic

• Government advance society, Scandinavians– Individualistic

• politics to advance personal economic goals– Traditionalistic

• hierarchy, authority

Page 21: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 22: Election of Women

Election of Women

Page 23: Election of Women

Election of Women

• Cultural v. Institutional factors– Traditional cultures =

• fewer women in ‘modern’ careers• fewer women candidates• less recruitment of women candidates