Potential Desiccation Cracks on Mars: A Review of Global
Observations using HiRISE M. R. El-Maarry1, W. Watters2, N. K.
McKeown3, J. Carter4, E. Noe Dobrea5,6, J. L. Bishop6,7, A.
Pommerol1, N. Thomas1. 1Physikalisches Institut, Bern Univeristät,
Sidler Str., 5, 3012, Berne, Switzerland
([email protected]). 2Whitin Observatory, Department
of Astronomy, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA. 3Department of
Physical Sciences, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
4Institut d'Astro-physique Spatiale, Paris-Sud University, Orsay,
France. 5Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA. 6NASA Ames
Research Center, Mountain View, CA, USA. 7SETI Institute, Mountain
View, CA 94043, USA.
Introduction: Our view of the surface of Mars
and ongoing seasonal processes has been radically improved since
the operation of the Mars Reconnais-sance Orbiter High Resolution
Imaging Science Exper-iment (HiRISE). The high sub-meter spatial
resolution offered by HiRISE has been a key in the identification
of small features and surface textures on the surface of Mars such
as the seasonal recurring slope lineae [1], and lava coils [2]. In
addition to these, HiRISE has aided in the identification of
polygonal crack patterns in association with phyllosilicate-bearing
terrains in low to mid-latitudes, which have been suggested to be
potential desiccation cracks [3–8]. In this study, we summarize and
review the global observations of such polygonal patterns and
assess their morphology, geo-logic setting and global distribution.
HiRISE observa-tions suggest that desiccation cracks and polygons
may be more common on the surface of Mars than previ-ously thought
and may have profound implications for our understanding of the
history of water on Mars, its early climate, and consequently, our
choice of candi-date landing sites for future exploration (e.g.,
ExoMars 2018 and 2020 mission).
The process of desiccation: Desiccation is usual-ly achieved
through evaporation from the surface, or diffusion processes either
through the migration of liquid water caused by differences in
water potential, or via vapor transport due to changes in water
vapor pressure. The depth and spacing of any resulting frac-tures
(i.e., size of polygonal network) depends on many factors, but
mainly on the thickness of the stressed zone. As a result, polygons
formed by desic-cation occur on the order of centimeters if the
stressed region is a thin surficial layer undergoing evaporation as
for example in the case of common mud cracks, or it can be on the
order of hundreds of meters if the stressed region is thick enough
because of intense evaporation and/or lowering of the water table
[9,10]. Generally, the more clay-rich the material is, the more it
will shrink with desiccation. In addition, certain clay minerals,
smectites, are known for their chemical af-finity to swell and
accommodate considerable amounts of water through formation of
water interlayers on a molecular level.
On Earth, many dried lakes and playas, in particu-lar in the US
states of California and Nevada, display
large
Fig. 1. Potential desiccation polygons (PDPs) on Mars as
observed by HiRISE in Mawrth Vallis (a), Libya Montes (b),
Margaritifer (c), and chloride-bearing terrains in Sirenum (d).
Fig. 2. Large features on the floor of Mawrth Vallis and the
large desiccation features in Lucerne Dry Lake in California, US
(34°29'49"N, 116°57'10"W). There is an exceptional similarity
between the patterns in terms of morphology, size and crack
propagation. Arrows point to the longest and largest sinuous
features in both locations. up to 300 m-wide desiccation polygons
that maybe analogous to similar features on Mars (Fig. 2). The
sediments in these locations can often be more than 50 meters thick
and are composed of predominantly silt-
1230.pdfEighth International Conference on Mars (2014)
and clay-rich soils containing clay minerals such as
montmorillonite, illite, and vermiculite in addition to carbonates
and analcites [11].
Potential desiccation polygons (PDPs) on Mars: PDPs are a common
feature in phyllosilicate- and chloride-bearing terrains [8, 12]
and have been ob-served with size scales that range from cm- to 10s
of meters-wide using images from HiRISE [e.g., 3–8] and currently
active rovers [13,14]. The global distribution of PDPs shows that
they share certain traits in terms of morphology and geologic
setting that can aid in their identification and distinguish them
from fracturing patterns caused by other processes (Fig. 3). Most
PDPs currently observed attain a size range of 2–30 meter-wide.
PDPs are almost exclusively observed in light-toned units with
respect to the surrounding terrain. They commonly underlie
dark-toned materials, which are often spectrally featureless and
display signs of recent exhumation. PDPs are generally flat and
usually subdivide extensively to form secondary to multiple
generations of cracks in a fractal-like pattern that is embedded
within the larger primary polygons and re-quires images with
sub-meter spatial resolution to identify. PDPs are mostly
associated with sedimentary deposits that display spectral evidence
for the presence of Fe/Mg smectites in addition to Al-rich
smectites and less commonly kaolinites, sulfates and carbonates. In
contrast, PDPs are uncommon in materials that have been heavily
modified by erosion, tectonism, or exten-sive reworking (e.g.,
central-peak materials uplifted by impact cratering). Similarly,
they are uncommon in materials of possible geothermal or
hydrothermal origin, which is inferred from the presence of
high-temperature/pressure mineral phases such as chlorites,
prehnite and serpentine.
Implications: PDPs can be excellent markers for paleolacustrine
environments and their presence im-plies that the fractured units
are rich in smectite miner-als. Together, the following criteria :
1) detection of Fe/Mg smectites along with salts, carbonates,
kaolin-ite, and possibly illite, 2) absence of high
tempera-ture/pressure phases, and 3) association with polygonal
patterns resembling PDPs make a certain location a high candidate
for a paleolacustrine site on Mars, which is a top-priority setting
for in-situ exploration and search for paleo-organic materials. The
presence of PDPs in association with many phyllosilicate expo-sures
that are located in natural basins and/or are of sedimentary origin
would argue for a more hydrologi-cally active period and warmer
conditions than what is observed today. However, the presence of
desiccation features is similarly consistent with climatic
conditions that display only short intermittent hydrological
activi-
ty characterized by ground-water activity in generally arid
conditions.
References: [1] McEwen A.S. et al., (2011), Sci-ence 333,
740–743. [2] Ryan, A.J. and Christensen, P.R., (2012), Science 336,
449–452. [3] Ehlmann, B. L., et al. (2009), JGR 114, E00D08. [4]
Wray, J. J., et al., (2011), JGR 116, E01001. [5] Erkeling, G., et
al., (2012), Icarus 219, 393–413. [6] Bishop, J. L., et al.,
(2013), JGR 118, 487–513. [7] McKeown, N. K. et al.,(2013), JGR
118, 1245–1256. [8] El Maarry et al., (2013), JGR 118, 2263–2278.
[9] El Maarry, et al., (2010), JGR 115, E10006. [10] El Maarry, M.
R., et al., (2012), E&PSL 323, 19–26. [11] Neal, J. T., et al.,
(1968), Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 79, 69–90. [12] Osterloo M.M. et al.,
(2010), JGR 115, E10012. [13] Watters, W. A., et al., (2011),
Icarus 211, 472–497. [14] Hallet, B., et al, (2013), LPSC XXIV,
abstract #3108.
Fig. 3. MOLA-based shaded relief map for the surface of Mars
containing locations of PDPs. The dataset includes cracking
patterns in smectite-bearing deposits that are found either in
horizontal beds (yellow), crustal outcrops (red), or
deltas/alluvial fans (light blue). Also included are the crack-ing
patterns in chloride-bearing terrains [8,12] (green). PDPs are
clustered in certain localities in the southern highlands, which
include Mawrth Vallis, Sirenum and Margaritifer Terra, eastern
Valles Marineris, circum-Isidis (Nili Fossae and Libya Montes), and
northern circum-Hellas.
1230.pdfEighth International Conference on Mars (2014)
/ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict >
/JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false
/CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300
/GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true
/GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300
/GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2
/GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true
/GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true
/GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict >
/GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict >
/JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false
/CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200
/MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true
/MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200
/MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
/EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode
/MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None
] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false
/PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true
/PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ]
/PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier ()
/PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped
/False
/CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe)
(Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false
/GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks
false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false
/IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings
/Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ]
/PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing
true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling
/UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>>
setdistillerparams> setpagedevice