eHealth Advisory Committee Interoperability Plan Workgroups Update HHSC eHealth Advisory Committee September 29, 2017
eHealth Advisory Committee Interoperability Plan Workgroups Update
HHSC eHealth Advisory Committee
September 29, 2017
Interoperability Report Background
• Required by House Bill 2641, Regular Session, 84th
Legislature
• The report should address measurable progress in
ensuring that relevant information systems are
interoperable with one another and meet the
appropriate standards.
• The report must include an assessment of the progress
made in achieving commission goals related to the
exchange of health information, including facilitating
care coordination among the agencies, ensuring quality
improvement, and realizing cost savings.
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 2
Interoperability Report Status
• Initial report submitted 2016
• Established a planning framework
• eHealth advisory committee input• Recommended projects• Measures
• Workgroups established• Business and Technology Operations• Communications• Governance• Infrastructure• Policy and Practice
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 3
Potential Interoperability Technologies Descriptive Information
• How is governance addressed?• What functions is the system responsible for?• Stakeholders/Communications plan• System creation date?• System End-of-Life projection date?• What clinical data is included?• With whom is data exchanged?
• Other HHS agencies• Between HHS and health care providers• Research (academic)
• What exchange currently occurs?• Does system currently use accredited standards (some/all
transactions)?• Are accredited standards available? (some/all transactions)• Does system use Health Services Gateway?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 4
Workgroup Reports
• Business and Technology Operations
• Communications
• Governance
• Infrastructure
• Policy and Practice
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 5
Business and Technology Operations
• Dr. Ogechika Alozi (Chair)
• A.J. Patel
• Will Rodriguez
• Dr. Gijs Van Oort
Staff: Steve Eichner, Leo Achembong, Peggy Hines
6
Business and Technology Operations - Discussion
• Overview of business services supported through
HHS Interoperability
• Information standards/adoption process used by
HHS agencies
• Data use agreements
• Data sharing
• Use of Health Services Gateway
• Pharmacy systems- ability to track adherence
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 7
Potential Interoperability Measures-System Performance
System (Example
s)
Numberof
Clients Served
by System
Numberof Clients Served in
Time Period
Number of
Providers Served
by System
Numberof
Providers Served in
Time Period
DollarValue
(where applicable)
Number ofTransactions
per Time Period Data Volume
Medicaid Claims
(Number of clients in Medicaid?)
X X X X X ?
ImmTrac X X X X X ?
MEHIS(Breakdown?)
X X X X X ?
StateHospital EHR
X X ? ? X ?
Lab Orders
X X X X ? X ?
9/29/2017e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting
8
Measure Notes
• Not all measures are appropriate for each system.
• Comparing information across systems must be done carefully, if at all- units of measure may be similar, however eligible patients, number of providers, what constitutes a transaction, and volume of data may all be different.
• Volume measures need system-specific descriptions to best understand value.
• Start with simple measures; expand as necessary.
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 9
Sample Care Coordination Questions/Possible Measures
• Does system have capacity to identify/track shared clients?
• What approach is currently used?
• Are reports (individual/system) currently available?
• What format of data is appropriate for care coordination?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 10
Discussion
11
Communications
• Dr. Gerald Nissley (Lead)
• Sarah Mills (Recorder)
• Rebecca Moreau (Reporter)
• Dr. Salil Deshpande
• Staff: Hope Morgan
12
Communications Challenges Impacting Interoperability
• Limited information about the effectiveness of HHS’ communications
• No measures of behavioral impacts
• Health Plans
• Limited member contact information provided by HHS
• Limited electronic communications with members
• Provider
• Information overload
• Messages received are unclear regarding significance
• Communications to rural providers
• Cultural Factors
• Members
• Varying attitudes to government messaging across the state
• Public perception of government extends to managed care
• Communications to rural members
• Cultural Factors
Bo
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 13
Potential Interoperability Measures- Communications
• Conduct Market Research- look at using survey technology to get a snapshot and feedback from web users
• Changes in behaviors of clients
• Changes in behaviors of providers
• Changes in behaviors of health plans
• Recognize the different modalities of communication that are effective for different stakeholders and explore “nudge” communications
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 14
Potential Interoperability Measures -System Performance
System (Examples) Members Providers Health Plans
General Population
Medicaid Website Website,Email
Paper, Email WebsiteSocial Media
Public Health WebsiteSocial Media
Website
Access and Eligibility Services
WebsiteSocial MediaTextEmail
WebsiteSocial Media
Long Term Care Website
Public Health Reporting
WebsitePublic Service Announcements
WebsiteSocial MediaNewslettersEmail
WebsitePublic Service Announcements
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 15
Sample Communications Questions/Possible Measures
• How effective is targeted messaging based on cultural factors ?
• Providers
• Health Plans
• Members
• General Population
• How responsive are providers to new interoperability capabilities implemented at HHS?
• Measure number of Meaningful User providers connected to HIEs
• Measure the number of health plans connected to HIEs
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 16
Other Areas For Communications To Explore
• Public Health
• Clinical Information available to providers
• Long Term Care
• Assisted Living
• Community Based Care
• State Supported Living Centers
• State Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 17
Governance
• Adam Chesler, PharmD (Lead)
• Nora Belcher
• Thomas Wheat
• George Gooch
Staff: Adriana Rhames, Hope Morgan
18
Update on Data Standards Survey
Governance Workgroup
HHSC e-Health Advisory Committee
September 29, 2017
Background on Governance Workgroup
Strategies for governance:
• Revise system-wide information governance to reflect new
organizational structure and facilitate compliance with
applicable policies.
• Implement a process to coordinate standards utilization.
• Work to address the incorporation of Texas’s needs into
national standards.
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 20
Data Standards Survey Questions
• Question 1: Does your organization participate in any national standards development work?
• Question 2: Are you aware of any situations where national standards may not have met the needs of the state of Texas? If so, please provide specific examples.
• Question 3: Please review these national standards (www.healthit.gov/standards-advisory). Are there any additional standards which would be useful for Texas but are not included on this list? Any that need to be removed from the list?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 21
Survey Question Response Data
Question# of
Responses Response Details Outliers
Participate in standardsdevelopment?
10 5 yes; 4 no; 1 unclear.
Organization examples include State Board of Nursing, ONC Advisory Committees, IEH USA, NQF telehealth framework, NCPDP, CMS data standards.
1 response may have been to the incorrect question. Overall, responses seem to be clearly yes or no.
Any standards that do not work for Texas?
10 9 no; 1 provided other feedback.
1 pharmacy representative mentioned crossover between workers comp issues and NCPDP telecommunications standards
Additional standards that would be useful? Need to remove any standards?
10 9 no (for adding or deleting); 1 provided other feedback.
1 pharmacy representative cautioned against incorporating HL7 standards into pharmacy.
9/6/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 22
Questions?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 23
Infrastructure
• Steve Eichner (Lead)
• George Gooch
• Elizabeth Adamson
• Pamela McNutt
Staff: Leo Achembong
24
Steve Eichner
George Gooch
Elizabeth Adamson
Pamela McNutt
Steve Eichner
George Gooch
Elizabeth Adamson
Pamela McNutt
Infrastructure Workgroup Areas Discussed
• Opportunities for Interoperability• Extend connectivity for
clinical data exchange for SSLCs and State Hospitals
• Electronic Case Reporting• Ask on Order Entry• Extend interoperability for
information on Medicaid clients
• Blood lead reporting• Advancing informatics in
public health
• Health Services Gateway• Support for programs across HHS• Moved into State Data Center
• New Service Capacities• Exchange of clinical data for Local
Mental Health Authorities/State Hospitals
• Public Health reporting through HIEs (in progress)
• ImmTrac2-Bi-directional exchange• (in progress)• Transition to new EHR in State
Supported Living Centers (SSLCs)• Replace Vital Statistics system
(2019)• Updates to communicable disease
system- tuberculosis• Conversion to Unified Helpdesk
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 25
Potential Interoperability Measures-System Performance
System (Example
s)
Numberof
Clients Served
by System
Numberof Clients Served in
Time Period
Number of
Providers Served
by System
Numberof
Providers Served in
Time Period
DollarValue
(where applicable)
Number ofTransactions
per Time Period Data Volume
Medicaid Claims
(Number of clients in Medicaid?)
X X X X X ?
ImmTrac X X X X X ?
MEHIS(Breakdown?)
X X X X X ?
StateHospital EHR
X X ? ? X ?
Lab Orders
X X X X ? X ?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 26
Measure Notes
• Not all measures are appropriate for each system.
• Comparing information across systems must be done carefully, if at all- units of measure may be similar, however eligible patients, number of providers, what constitutes a transaction, and volume of data may all be different.
• Volume measures need system-specific descriptions to best understand value.
• Start with simple measures; expand as necessary.
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 27
Sample Care Coordination Questions/Possible Measures
• Does system have capacity to identify/track shared clients?
• What approach is currently used?
• Are reports (individual/system) currently available?
• What format of data is appropriate for care coordination?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 28
Discussion
29
Policy and Practice
• Leo Achembong (Lead)
• Kristi Henderson
• Dr. Stacey Cropley
• Erin McManus
• Scott M. Freshour
Staff: Steve Eichner
30
Policy and Practice Workgroup Areas Discussed
• Establishing and maintaining reporting
requirements and standards, including public
health reporting
• Privacy and security of HHS information
• Developments in interoperability within the HHS
• Internal audit activity
• Support for Federal Programs – MIPS and
Meaningful Use
• Use of Health Services Gateway for efficiency
• Benefits realization by both HHS and partners
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 31
Potential Interoperability Measures-System Performance
System (Example
s)
Numberof
Clients Served
by System
Numberof Clients Served in
Time Period
Number of
Providers Served
by System
Numberof
Providers Served in
Time Period
DollarValue
(where applicable)
Number ofTransactions
per Time Period Data Volume
Medicaid Claims
(Number of clients in Medicaid?)
X X X X X ?
ImmTrac X X X X X ?
MEHIS(Breakdown?)
X X X X X ?
StateHospital EHR
X X ? ? X ?
Lab Orders
X X X X ? X ?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 32
Measure Notes
• Not all measures are appropriate for each system.
• Comparing information across systems must be done carefully, if at all- units of measure may be similar, however eligible patients, number of providers, what constitutes a transaction, and volume of data may all be different.
• Volume measures need system-specific descriptions to best understand value.
• Start with simple measures; expand as necessary.
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 33
Sample Care Coordination Questions/Possible Measures
• Does system have capacity to identify/track shared clients?
• What approach is currently used?
• Are reports (individual/system) currently available?
• What format of data is appropriate for care coordination?
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 34
Discussion
35
Thank you
9/29/2017 e-Health Advisory Committee Meeting 36
Steve Eichner
HIT Policy Director, DSHS