Top Banner
KCTCS Board of Regents June 2015 Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee
23

Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

Cory Oliver
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

KCTCS Board of Regents

June 2015

Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee

Page 2: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

STRATEGIC PLAN 2010-16Kentucky Community and Technical College

Page 3: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

• Advance excellence and innovation in teaching, learning and service

• Increase student access, transfer and success• Cultivate diversity, multiculturalism and

inclusion• Enhance the economic and workforce

development of the Commonwealth• Promote the recognition and value of KCTCS

Goals

Page 4: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

ENGAGEMENT: CCSSE

2007 2009 2011 2013 2016 Target

Active Learning 50.3 49.2 47.5 48.7 50.0

Student Effort 51.5 51.4 51.5 51.1 50.0

Academic Challenge 51.9 50.9 50.3 50.4 50.0

Student / Faculty Interaction 53.9 52.9 53.2 53.7 50.0

Support for Learners 52.8 51.7 51.8 52.5 50.0

Community College Student Survey of Student EngagementBenchmark Scores

Definition: Average scores on CCSSE’s benchmarks of effective educational practice.

Source: Community College Survey of Student Engagement

Page 5: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2015-16 Target

70%

72%

74%

76%

78%

80%

82%

84%

86%

88%

87% 87% 88%85% 84% 85% 85%

77%

Licensure / Certification Pass Rate

Source: Individual Kentucky State Boards and/or KCTCS Colleges Definition: Percent of first-time takers passing licensure and certification exams required by the profession for entry-level positions as reported by state and national examining boards or college licensure exam administrators/program coordinators.

Page 6: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

Developmental Education Success Rate:

2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort 2012 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2014 Cohort 2016 Target0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

62.9% 64.3% 63.7% 58.2% 60.8% 60.8% 59.0%

TARG

ET

English

Source: KCTCS Student Records Database. Definition: Percent of first-time, credential-seeking students testing at a developmental English level who successfully complete a developmental course or re-test at a college English level within two year.

Page 7: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort 2012 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2014 Cohort 2016 Target0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

55.1% 56.4% 56.3% 53.0% 49.0% 52.3% 50.5%

TARG

ET

Developmental Education Success Rate: Math

Source: KCTCS Student Records Database. Definition: Percent of first-time, credential-seeking students testing at a developmental Math level who successfully complete a developmental course or re-test at a college Math level within two year.

Page 8: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort 2012 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2014 Cohort 2016 Target0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

60.5% 63.8% 65.7% 60.8% 63.7% 66.2%65.6%

TARG

ET

Developmental Education Success Rate: Reading

Source: KCTCS Student Records Database. Definition: Percent of first-time, credential-seeking students testing at a developmental Reading level who successfully complete a developmental course or re-test at a college Reading level within two year.

Page 9: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2015 Target2.9%

3.0%

3.1%

3.2%

3.3%

3.4%

3.5%

3.6%

3.7%

3.2% 3.5% 3.7% 3.7%3.3% 3.3%

Participation Rate

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE; US Census Bureau Population Estimates; KPR Projections. Definition: KCTCS fall credit enrollment from colleges’ enrollment clusters divided by the population aged 18-64; KCTCS participation rate includes all Kentucky resident students.

Page 10: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2015-16 Target0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

22,744 24,838 27,813 28,544 28,469 31,715 30,942

Credentials

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE. Definition: Annual count of total credentials (associate degrees, certificates, and diplomas) awarded.

Page 11: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2015-16 Target0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

6,861 7,270 7,899 8,953 8,875 9,58010,435

Associate Degrees Awarded

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE. Definition: Annual count of associate degrees awarded.

Page 12: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort 2012 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2016 Target30.0%

32.0%

34.0%

36.0%

38.0%

40.0%

42.0%

44.0%

46.0%

48.0%

50.0%

45.8% 49.1% 48.7% 48.5% 46.1% 42.9%43.9%

Persistence Rate

TARG

ET

Source: KCTCS Student Records Database and National Student Clearinghouse. Definition: Percent of fall/summer first-time credential-seeking students who have earned a credential, transferred to a four-year institution, or are still enrolled at the end of three year.

Page 13: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Target0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

9,450 10,410 12,330 10,644

12,330

Transfer

TARG

ET

Source: Kentucky Council for Postsecondary Education Definition: Annual number of students who enter public, independent or proprietary postsecondary institutions in Kentucky as a first-time transfer student or transfer KCTCS credit.

Page 14: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2015 Target98.0%

100.0%

102.0%

104.0%

106.0%

108.0%

110.0%

112.0%

104.0% 103.8% 104.9% 108.4% 110.0%

111.9%

Student Diversity

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE; National Center for Health Statistics; US Census Bureau Population Estimates. Definition: Percent of students with known ethnicity in all racial/ethnic categories excluding white and nonresident alien, based on fall unduplicated headcount, compared to percent minority population aged 18-64 in enrollment cluster.

Page 15: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 Target20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

61.6% 59.2% 56.4% 59.2% 58.5% 55.4%

100.0%

Employee Diversity

TARG

ET

Source: IPEDS, Official data as reported to CPE, and National Center for Health Statistics. Definition: Percent of employees in all racial/ethnic categories excluding white, nonresident alien, and unknown compared to percent minority population aged 18-64 in enrollment cluster.

Page 16: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

Persistence Rate: Diversity

2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort 2012 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2016 Target0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

34.0% 40.1% 42.2% 41.9% 37.1% 35.1% 36.0%

TARG

ET

Source: KCTCS Student Records Database and National Student Clearinghouse.Definition: Percent of minority first-time, credential-seeking students testing at a developmental Reading level who successfully complete a developmental course or re-test at a college Reading level within two year.

Page 17: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2015-16 Target0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,098 3,207 2,759 3,089 3,274 3,092

3,626 3,496

High Wage/High Demand Completions

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE; Kentucky Occupational Outlook; Occupational Wages. Definition: Number of unduplicated credentials in programs cross-walked to a high wage, high demand occupation.

Page 18: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015 Target20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

91.5% 87.5% 85.1% 83.3% 83.3% 79.8%

83.3%

Wage Index

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE; UI wage match; Office of Employment and Training’s Occupational Wages. Definition: Median quarterly wage of all graduates making at least $2,500 in the 2nd quarter post graduation divided by the Kentucky median occupational wage.

Page 19: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008-09 Cohort 2009-10 Cohort 2010-11 Cohort 2011-12 Cohort 2012-13 Cohort 2013-14 Cohort 2015-16 Target0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

4.2% 4.5% 4.6% 5.9% 4.9% 5.2%

6.8%

Workforce Matriculation

TARG

ET

Source: Official data as reported to CPE and KCTCS Student Records. Definition: Percent of students with workforce non-credential academic plan (excluding fire rescue students) who enroll as credential-seeking students or earn a credential within three academic years.

Page 20: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

$75,681,000

$92,601,000

$85,750,000

$83,550,000

$79,090,000

$77,320,000

Financial Contributions

Source: KCTCS Office of Advancement, Grants, and Contracts, and TreasuryDefinition: Annual dollar amount (rounded to the nearest $1,000) of financial contributions from grants, contracts, advancement, and other external sources and endowment income.

Page 21: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015-16 Target0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

4,17396%

Positive

6,24996%

Positive

12,357100% Positive

12,96999% Positive

14,721100% Positive

14,40599.7%

Positive

13,000

Media Focus

TARG

ET

Source: VOCUS, “Today’s News”, compiled by KCTCS Public Relations.Definition: Number of media citations and positive citations as a percent of total.

Page 22: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

• Volume metrics: credentials awarded, associate degrees awarded, transfer, media focus

• Access: minority representation

What Have We Done Well?

Page 23: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

• Success Rates: developmental education, persistence

• Achievement Gaps: minority persistence• Responsiveness to Economy: wage index, high

wage/high demand completions• Action Planning

What Needs to Improve?