Page 1
Effects of Urbanization on theDynamics of Organic Sediments in
Temperate Lakes
Tessa B. Francis,1,* Daniel E. Schindler,2 Justin M. Fox,3 andElizabeth Seminet-Reneau4
1Department of Biology, and School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, P.O. Box 355020 Seattle, Washington
98195-5020, USA; 2School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, P.O. Box 355020 Seattle, Washington 98195-
5020, USA; 3Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53703, USA; 4Fishery Resources, University of Idaho,
Moscow, Idaho 83844-1136, USA
ABSTRACT
Residential development of lakeshores affects the
structure and function of riparian and littoral
habitats. Organic detritus in sediments is a critical
component of littoral food webs, but the effects of
urbanization on sediment characteristics are
unexplored. We characterized the quantity of or-
ganic sediments in Pacific Northwest lakes along a
development gradient and found a 10-fold decline
in the proportion of detritus in littoral sediments
associated with density of lakeshore dwellings. In a
comparison between two fully developed lakes and
two undeveloped reference lakes, we examined
several possible controls on sedimentary organic
content, including terrestrial inputs, decomposition
rates and associated macroinvertebrate communi-
ties, and physical retention by coarse wood. The
littoral sediments of undeveloped lakes ranged
from 34 to 77% organic by mass, whereas the
range on urban lakes was an order of magnitude
less, ranging from 1 to 3% organic. We found no
significant differences in terrestrial litter inputs
between the two sets of lakes. Leaf litter decom-
position rates did not vary significantly between
the two sets of lakes, and we found higher densities
of shredder macroinvertebrate taxa in the littoral
zones of undeveloped lakes. Sedimentary organic
matter on undeveloped lakes accumulated in
shallow waters and declined with distance from
shore, whereas the opposite pattern existed on
urban lakes. Our results suggest that coarse wood
physically retains organic matter in littoral zones
where it can enter the detrital energy pathway, and
the loss of this feature on urban lakes alters littoral
sediment characteristics, with potentially far-
reaching consequences for lake food webs.
Key words: littoral; urban ecology; coarse woody
debris; sediments; organic matter; leaf litter; aqua-
tic-terrestrial coupling; benthic invertebrates.
INTRODUCTION
As urban development sprawls, the effects of hu-
man activities on lake ecosystems are becoming
more apparent and complex. For several decades,
the greatest human threat to lake ecosystems was
eutrophication of surface waters (Schindler 1978;
Carpenter and others 1998). Though eutrophica-
tion owing to nonpoint source pollution from
agricultural, urban, and industrial sources remains
a problem for lakes in North America (Carpenter
and others 1998; Moore and others 2003), it is
apparent that human activities have myriad effects
Received 15 January 2007; accepted 26 June 2007; published online 31
July 2007.
*Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]
Ecosystems (2007) 10: 1057–1068DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9077-0
1057
Page 2
on lake ecosystems. For example, fish growth rates
are negatively correlated with lakeshore develop-
ment intensity (Schindler and others 2000), and
the spatial distribution of fishes is altered by
urbanization (Lewin and others 2004; Scheuerell
and Schindler 2004). Lakeshore and watershed
urbanization are correlated with reduced amphib-
ian abundance (Woodford and Meyer 2003) and
shifts in benthic invertebrate (Quinlan and others
2002) and zooplankton (Dodson and others 2005)
community composition.
Human activities and their impacts on limnetic
ecosystems are concentrated along lakeshores,
where coupling between terrestrial and aquatic
systems is particularly strong. Residential develop-
ment of shorelines is associated with reductions in
riparian forest density as homes, lawns, and related
residential structures replace native vegetation
(Christensen and others 1996; Francis and Schin-
dler 2006; Marburg and others 2006) and alter
plant community diversity, reducing the abun-
dance of native plant species (Elias and Meyer
2003). Humans alter littoral habitats through resi-
dential development, for example by removing
macrophytes (Jennings and others 2003), which in
turn changes the spatial distribution of fishes
(Bryan and Scarnecchia 1992).
One unexplored consequence of lakeshore
urbanization is its impact on the distribution, com-
position, and abundance of sedimentary organic
matter. The role of detritus and organic matter as a
critical energy link in lakes has long been recog-
nized (Lindeman 1942). Recently, it is argued that
detritus forms the foundation for energy flow in
many aquatic ecosystems (Polis and Strong 1996;
Moore and others 2004). Organic matter provides a
substrate for colonization by bacteria and other
microbes, which are a food source for macroinver-
tebrates and fishes. Because benthic energy path-
ways are critical to upper trophic levels in lakes
(Schindler and Scheuerell 2002; Vander Zanden
and Vadeboncoeur 2002), the loss of this detrital
energy source could have major consequences for
food web structure and lake ecosystem function.
Here, we hypothesize that the loss of coarse
wood from urban littoral habitats increases the flow
of organic sediments to deeper waters, resulting in
lower organic content in littoral sediments. One
alternative hypothesis is that decreased inputs of
terrestrial leaf litter from thinned urban riparian
forests reduce littoral detritus, as development
intensity is also associated with riparian deforesta-
tion on this same set of lakes (Francis and Schindler
2006). Leaf litter inputs to lake surface waters have
seldom been quantified, and yet they can be sub-
stantial (Gasith and Hasler 1976; France and Peters
1995). Because allochthonous sources can domi-
nate the organic pools in littoral sediments (Piec-
zynska 1990a), it is possible that the losses of
particulate terrestrial inputs associated with ripar-
ian deforestation may be implicated in reduced
littoral detritus pools. Another potential explana-
tion for the lower organic content of urban lake
sediments is that developed lakes have higher rates
of decomposition, and therefore particulate organic
matter is more rapidly processed and transferred
into either the invertebrate pool or the dissolved
organic matter pool. Microbial degradation can
increase under higher nutrient conditions (Oertli
1993; Bayo and others 2005), and certain detritiv-
orous macroinvertebrates thrive under eutrophic
conditions associated with urbanization (Kashian
and Burton 2000). Higher rates of invertebrate- or
bacteria-driven decomposition in urban lakes may
therefore explain losses of littoral sediment organic
matter along a gradient of urbanization.
Loss of coarse wood (dead and downed tree
stems and branches, here defined as >1 m in length
and >10 cm in diameter) from littoral habitats is
strongly associated with shoreline urbanization
(Christensen and others 1996; Francis and Schin-
dler 2006; Marburg and others 2006). Although it
is assumed that wood is important in the structure
and function of littoral habitats (Schindler and
Scheuerell 2002; Jennings and others 2003), as yet
very little is known about the specific roles played
by coarse wood in lakes. It has been shown
extensively in streams that coarse wood increases
organic matter retention (Bilby 1981; Bilby and
Ward 1991), and less coarse wood in urban lakes
may result in a loss of sediment organic matter. The
majority of detritus in lakes is deposited in shallow
water zones (Piezynska 1990b) where it then be-
comes part of the sediments. In the absence of
coarse wood as a physical structure to retain par-
ticulate detritus in shallow waters, organic matter
deposited in littoral zones may be transported to
deeper waters, resulting in reduced organic content
of urban littoral sediments. This reduction in lit-
toral sediment quality may in turn have conse-
quences for upper trophic levels and lake-wide food
web interactions, as littoral habitats house a variety
of benthic invertebrates that serve as prey items for
fishes and are therefore key sites for benthic–pela-
gic coupling (Schindler and Scheuerell 2002; Van-
der Zanden and Vadeboncoeur 2002).
In this paper, we investigate the effects of shore-
line urbanization on littoral habitat characteristics,
specifically the organic content of littoral sediments.
We then explore several possible mechanisms to
1058 T. B. Francis and others
Page 3
explain the relationship between lakeshore devel-
opment and sediment organic matter. Previous re-
sults showed a relationship between urbanization
and loss of littoral coarse wood (Francis and Schin-
dler 2006), therefore we mapped the distribution of
sediments with distance from shore, hypothesizing
that littoral coarse wood retains organic matter in
littoral sediments. Because the riparian zones of
urban lakes in this region are deforested (Francis
and Schindler 2006), we explored whether reduc-
tion in leaf litter inputs results in lower organic
matter in urban sediments compared to undevel-
oped lakes with intact riparian forests. Finally, be-
cause decomposition processes can control sediment
characteristics, we measured decomposition rates
on urban lakes and compared them to those ob-
served on undeveloped lakes to determine whether
biodegradation explains sediment organic content.
METHODS
We sampled 15 lakes in western Washington State
and southern British Columbia, Canada (see
Francis and Schindler 2006 for physical descrip-
tions). The lakes are all located in the western
hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) zone of the Cascade
Range and Puget Trough regions. Study lakes span
a gradient of urban development and are mostly
located in the urban fringe of the Seattle Metro-
politan area. Nearly all lakes were closed to boats
with outboard motors. Three undeveloped lakes
were selected as reference systems, located in the
University of British Columbia‘s Malcolm Knapp
Research Forest. The latitudinal gradient between
our study sites is not sufficient to affect forest or
invertebrate community composition.
We surveyed the lakes between July and October
of 2002 and in October 2006 for development
intensity, coarse wood density and basal area, and
sediment composition. A full description of the
survey and coarse wood sampling strategy is given
in Francis and Schindler (2006). On each lake, we
selected 4–8 transects measuring 30 m along the
lakeshore, ensuring to select an even number of
both leeward and windward sites. Along each
transect, we enumerated and measured the diam-
eter of all pieces of coarse wood (‡10 cm in diam-
eter, ‡1 m in length) within or intersecting the
0.5 m depth contour. We calculated coarse wood
basal area for each plot as the sum of all individual
log basal areas, defined as
basal area¼ p�r2 ð1Þ
where r = radius at breast height (trees), or where
the log intersected the 0.5 m depth contour. We
characterized sediment composition by collecting
the top 5 cm of sediments in 0.5 m of water using a
10 cm diameter hand-held sediment corer. Sedi-
ments were refrigerated to limit further biotic
processing until they were dried at 60�C to a con-
stant mass and then combusted at 550�C to deter-
mine ash free dry mass (AFDM). Sediment organic
matter was calculated as the proportion of dry mass
lost during combustion.
To investigate the mechanisms driving the rela-
tionship between lakeshore urbanization and sed-
iment organic matter observed in the survey, we
conducted a focused comparative study between
two urban, fully developed lakes (that is, >95% of
shoreline developed; Star and Shady Lakes) located
in suburban areas of Seattle and two wholly
undeveloped lakes (Loon and Gwendoline Lakes)
in British Columbia (Figure 1). These two sets of
lakes represent the high and low ends of the gra-
dients for sediment organic matter and residential
development observed in the survey (Francis and
Schindler 2006; Table 1).
We measured leaf litter input on the set of four
lakes by establishing three transects running per-
pendicular to shore at randomly selected sites along
the shoreline. Along each transect, we measured
the lateral distribution of terrestrial leaf litter inputs
to surface waters from July 2003 to April 2004 by
deploying litter traps, 20 cm · 30 cm (0.06 m2)
floating plastic bins, at 1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 m from
shore. The litter traps passively sampled aerial lit-
terfall constantly for 10 months. Contents were
removed every 22–61 (median: 46) days and dried
at 60�C to a constant mass. In September 2003, a
heavy rainstorm raised the water level of Loon
Lake such that all traps were swamped. In February
2004, Gwendoline Lake was frozen and traps were
inaccessible; however, bins continued to collect
litter inputs, and therefore the sample collected in
March was assumed to include inputs from the
previous period.
To measure decomposition rates in the four
lakes, we incubated red alder (Alnus rubra) leaves
in mesh bags anchored to the lake bottom at two
depths during late summer/autumn and winter.
We collected senescent alder leaves from the wa-
tershed surrounding each lake, dried them at room
temperature, and created leaf packets which were
placed in either fine (<0.5 mm) or coarse (1 cm)
mesh bags. The fine mesh bags successfully pre-
vented the colonization of leaf packets by macro-
invertebrates. Bags were weighed before
incubation and anchored to cinder blocks on the
lake bottom at two depths, above and below the
thermocline, to incorporate potential variation in
Urbanization and Lake Sediments 1059
Page 4
invertebrate and microbial decomposition rates
associated with temperature. Several reference bags
were put through the weighing, bagging, and
placement process to establish mass lost during
transport, and this correction factor ()1.6% for fine
bags, )6.9% for coarse mesh) was applied to all
bags before statistical analyses. After the incubation
period, bags were retrieved by SCUBA, dried at
60�C to a constant weight, and reweighed.
Decomposition rate k (Petersen and Cummins
1974) was calculated according to an exponential
function as follows:
Wt ¼ W0eð�ktÞ ð2Þ
where Wt is equal to the mass of leaf material
remaining after incubating for t days and W0 is the
initial corrected mass.
We collected surface sediments at various dis-
tances from shore on all four lakes to assess the
spatial distribution and particle size composition of
sediment organic matter. We stratified distances
into ‘‘near‘‘ (1–10 m) and ‘‘far‘‘ (20–40 m) from
shore, based on previous work showing that the
majority of allochthonous inputs are deposited
within 10 m from shore (France and Peters 1995).
We did not measure sediment organic matter in the
deep basins of these lakes, but rather concentrated
on the littoral zones, where organic matter accu-
mulation was observed in the survey. We collected
sediments using an Ekman dredge below each
floating litter trap in summer and winter. Each
sample was sorted using soil sieves into smaller
than 0.06, 0.06, 0.12, 0.18, 0.42, 1.0, 2.5, and
6.35 mm size categories and dried at 60�C to a
constant mass. A subsample of each was combusted
and the proportion of organic content was calcu-
lated for each size category as described above.
We sampled the benthic macroinvertebrate
communities in each of the four lakes along the
established transects using an Ekman dredge dur-
ing the late summer of 2003. We collected inver-
tebrates in surface sediments below each floating
litter trap at depths of 0.3–11 m of water. Inverte-
brates were preserved in 95% ethanol and identi-
fied to family.
Statistical Analyses
We used SYSTAT 11.0 (Systat Software Inc., 2004)
for all statistical analyses. Data transforma-
tions—arcsine square root transformations for the
proportion organic matter in sediments and natural
log transformation for density of lakeshore resi-
dences—were performed prior to statistical analy-
ses to normalize data. We used least-squares
regression using data from the 15-lake survey
(excluding one outlier; Studentized resid-
ual = )3.1) to assess the relationships between
lakeshore residential density and sediment organic
matter, and coarse wood density and sediment or-
ganic matter content. Previous work has demon-
strated a relationship between lake morphometry
and sediment organic matter (Rowan and others
Figure 1. Shorelines of Pacific
Northwest lakes of different residential
development intensity. A Gwendoline
Lake, British Columbia, undeveloped;
B Shady Lake, Washington State, 100%
of shoreline developed.
Table 1. Lake Biophysical Characteristics
Lake Location Maximum
depth (m)
Mean
depth
(m)
Surface
area
(ha)
Residential
density
(houses m)1
shoreline)
Coarse wood
density
(pieces m)1
shoreline)
Sediment
organic matter
(proportion
by mass)
Epilimnetic
Chlorophyll-a
(ll)1)
Gwendoline 19�49¢N 34�122¢W 27 13.4 13.0 0 425.0 0.77 0.69
Loon 19�49¢N 34�122¢W 55 26 48.6 0 516.7 0.34 0.66
Shady 25�47¢N 6�122¢W 12 6 8.5 40 10.0 0.01 4.83
Star 21�47¢N 17�122¢W 15 8 14.2 40.6 0 0.03 1.32
1060 T. B. Francis and others
Page 5
1992), therefore we also tested for a relationship
between lake size (surface area and perimeter) and
sediment organic matter in the 15 lakes using least-
squares regression. A final regression investigated
the relationship between lake size (surface area)
and residential density. In the focused comparison
between urban and undeveloped lakes, we tested
whether decomposition rates varied according to
lake development level using ANOVA with daily
mass loss rate as the response variable and devel-
opment level (developed and undeveloped), season
(summer and winter), depth (above and below the
thermocline), and mesh size (coarse and fine) as
main factors, using post-hoc tests where we found
significance. To test the effect of coarse wood on
organic sediment particle distribution, we used
ANOVA with coarse wood density (high, low) and
distance from shore as main effects on organic
content of each particle size category, and we ran
Student‘s t-tests to test for development differences
within seasons at specific distances. We used a
MANOVA to test for significant differences in
invertebrate communities between the undevel-
oped and urban lakes.
RESULTS
Sediment organic matter decreased significantly as
shoreline residential development density in-
creased in the survey of 15 lakes (adjusted
r2 = 0.60, n = 15, P = 0.001; Figure 2A). The sedi-
ment organic content varied from roughly 74% on
undeveloped lakes to less than 2% on fully devel-
oped lakes. The organic matter content of littoral
sediments was significantly and positively associ-
ated with the density of coarse wood (adjusted
r2 = 0.63, n = 14, P = 0.001; Figure 2B) and coarse
wood basal area (adjusted r2 = 0.68, n = 14,
P < 0.001; not shown). We found no significant
relationship between sediment organic matter and
either metric of lake size, surface area (adjusted
r2 = 0.07, n = 14, P = 0.18; Figure 2C), or shore-
line length (adjusted r2 < 0.001, n = 14, P = 0.99),
and we found no significant relationship between
residential density and lake surface area (adjusted
r2 < 0.001, n = 14, P = 0.78; Figure 2D) or lake
perimeter (adjusted r2 = 0.07, n = 14, P = 0.15; not
shown).
On each of the four lakes sampled for the fo-
cused comparison, annual terrestrial leaf litter
inputs decreased with distance from shore (Fig-
ure 3A). We found no significant effect of
development (F1,17 = 2.5, P = 0.13) on annual
leaf litter inputs to surface waters across all dis-
tances combined, though the trend was for
higher inputs to urban lakes than to undeveloped
lakes (Figure 3A; Table 2). Litter inputs varied
with distance on all lakes (F1,17 = 5.1, P = 0.04),
decreasing with distance from shore according to
a negative exponential model (developed
lakes: Inputs = 158.98e)0.31 · Distance, r2 = 0.98;
undeveloped lakes: Inputs = 66.9e)0.67 · Distance,
r2 = 0.99). The majority (that is, >70%) of leaf
litter was deposited within 5 m of shore, and
Figure 2. Organic proportion of littoral
sediments as a function of A residential
development and B coarse wood
density; and sediment organic
proportion C, and density of shoreline
residences D as a function of lake
surface area. All data shown are from a
survey of 15 Pacific Northwest lakes,
excluding one outlier (n = 14).
Proportion data were arcsine-square
root transformed prior to statistical
analysis. Each point represents a whole
lake mean.
Urbanization and Lake Sediments 1061
Page 6
significantly less was observed beyond 10 m
(P = 0.04). On a seasonal basis, leaf litter inputs
varied significantly by development only during
fall (P = 0.04; Figure 3B and Table 2), with
higher inputs to developed lakes during that
season. Peak seasonal leaf litter inputs occurred
during fall on developed lakes and during sum-
mer on undeveloped lakes.
We found significant effects of season and
mesh size, but no significant effect of lake
development or depth relative to the thermocline,
on decomposition rates across all litterbag treat-
ments (Table 3; Figure 4). Decomposition rates
were greater in summer than in winter (Tukey‘s
HSD adjusted r2 = 0.22, df = 1, P = 0.006), and
were greater in coarse mesh bags than in fine
(Tukey‘s HSD adjusted r2 = 0.53, df = 1,
P < 0.001), across both development types and
incubation positions.
In undeveloped lakes, sediment organic matter
accumulated inshore, whereas in developed lakes,
sediment detritus increased with distance away
from shore (Figure 5). We found significant
interactions between development and distance
from shore (F4,19 = 22.4, P < 0.0001) and distance
and season (F4,19 = 4.1, P = 0.02), and we found
a significant three-way interaction effect between
development, season, and distance from shore
(F4,19 = 5.3, P = 0.005) on the organic proportion
of sediments between 1 and 40 m from the shore,
such that organic matter decreased with distance
from shore on undeveloped lakes but increased
with distance on developed lakes. These patterns
generally held in both summer and winter, ex-
cept that overall organic content was higher in
urban lakes in winter and more variable closest to
shore in undeveloped lakes in summer. We also
found significant effects of development
(F1,19 = 86.0, P < 0.0001) and season (F1,19 = 8.7,
P = 0.008) on the proportion organic in sedi-
ments. The mean (SE) proportion by mass of
organic littoral sediments on undeveloped lakes
was 0.71 (0.11), as compared to 0.11 (0.05) on
developed lakes. In both seasons, the amount of
sediment detritus on the two lake types con-
verged at 40 m from shore.
Urbanization affected the size distribution of
sediment particles. In particular, the smallest par-
ticles (<0.06 mm) accumulated nearshore on
undeveloped lakes in greater proportions than on
developed lakes (Figure 6). In fact, there were al-
most no fine particles in the nearshore sediments of
developed lakes. In tests on the distribution of the
smallest (<0.06 mm) organic sediment particles,
there were significant interaction effects between
development and season (F4,20 = 7.3, P = 0.01) and
distance and season (F4,20 = 4.2, P = 0.01), as well
as a significant distance effect (F4,20 = 23.8,
P < 0.0001). In summer, a significantly greater
proportion of fine organic particles accumulated
within 5 m of shore on undeveloped lakes versus
developed lakes (P = 0.02). In contrast, there was
no significant difference in the proportion of fine
organic particles in littoral sediments between
developed and undeveloped lakes in winter
(P = 0.85).
The benthic macroinvertebrate community var-
ied substantially between urban and undeveloped
lakes (Figure 7). The macroinvertebrate commu-
nity composition in developed and undeveloped
lakes were significantly different (MANOVA, Wilks‘
Lambda, F7,45 = 2.18, P = 0.05); specifically, we
found higher densities of shredding caddisflies
(Trichoptera) on the undeveloped lakes (P = 0.02)
and higher densities of detritivorous isopods (Iso-
poda) on urban lakes (P = 0.03; Figure 7). The
densities of grazing mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and
predatory odonates (Odonata) were 12.9 and
10.7 m)2, respectively, in the littoral zones of
Figure 3. Terrestrial leaf litter inputs to nearshore sur-
face waters on two undeveloped (solid bars) and two
developed (open bars) lakes. A Annual inputs (±1 SE) at
varying distances from shore. B Seasonal inputs (±1 SE)
across all distances.
1062 T. B. Francis and others
Page 7
undeveloped lakes, whereas these taxa were en-
tirely absent from similar habitats on urban lakes.
DISCUSSION
Shoreline urbanization has a variety of impacts on
lake ecosystems, including eutrophication and al-
tered littoral habitat structure, vegetation commu-
nity composition, and fish growth and behavior
(Schindler and others 2000; Scheuerell and
Schindler 2004; Marburg and others 2006). Our
results demonstrate two additional consequences of
shoreline urbanization: changes in the composition
and distribution of organic sediments and shifts in
the benthic macroinvertebrate community. We
suggest that the best explanation for depleted or-
ganic matter in urban littoral habitats is the absence
of coarse wood, which provides a physical structure
that retains detritus in littoral zones of undevel-
oped lakes. Without coarse wood to retain organic
matter in shallow waters, organic matter is trans-
ported by gravity and hydrodynamics to deeper
waters on urban lakes.
Riparian Litterfall Influence on SedimentOrganic Matter
Our finding that leaf inputs on all lakes decrease
with distance from shore according to a negative
exponential model concurs with previous studies
(Szczepanski 1965; Rau 1976); however, we did not
find reduced annual litter inputs to developed lakes.
Based on other findings that terrestrial inputs can be
tightly linked to littoral organic matter (Efford 1969)
and the extensive literature on the role of litterfall in
lotic ecosystems, we expected that litterfall into
lakes would be reduced in urban environments,
where dramatic riparian deforestation has occurred
(Francis and Schindler 2006). Indeed, the rare
quantification of litterfall to the surface waters of
lakes has been expressed in terms of litter inputs per
Table 2. Leaf Litter Inputs to Surface Waters of Two Developed (Star, Shady) and Two Undeveloped(Gwendoline, Loon) Lakes
Annual inputs
(g dry weight)
Seasonal inputs (g dry weight)
Mean SE Summer Late summer/early fall Fall Winter/early spring
Developed 165.1 63.7 8.9 21.4 99.7a 10.8
Undeveloped 37.4 21.2 19.6 4.3 13.1b 0.0
Different letters in each column indicate significant differences among lake types (Student‘s t-test; P < 0.05).
Table 3. Summary of ANOVA Results showingEffects of Development (developed, undeveloped),Depth (above, below the thermocline), Season(summer, winter) and Bag Mesh (coarse, fine) onLeaf Litter Decomposition Rates
Factor Least squares mean F-ratio df P-value
Development 0.2 1 0.70
Undeveloped 0.004
Developed 0.004
Depth 3.3 1 0.09
Above 0.0044
Below 0.0035
Season 23.5 1 0.0002
Summer 0.005
Winter 0.003
Mesh 55.9 1 <0.0001
Fine 0.002
Coarse 0.006
Figure 4. Daily decomposition rates of leaves incubated
in two undeveloped (filled boxes) and two developed (open
boxes) lakes in coarse and fine mesh bags during summer
and winter. Boxes represent whole lake means.
Urbanization and Lake Sediments 1063
Page 8
meter of forested shoreline (Szczepanski 1965;
Jordan and Likens 1975; Gasith and Hasler 1976).
One explanation for the absence of significantly
different litterfall rates between developed and
undeveloped lakes is the riparian forest composition
shift that occurs with urbanization on lakes in this
region. In lowland areas of the Pacific Northwest, the
native riparian forest is dominated by conifers, pri-
marily Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), western
hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), and western red cedar
(Thuja plicata; Franklin and Dyrness 1973). On the
urban lakes in this study, in contrast, native forests
are most often replaced with non-native, deciduous
species (T. Francis, personal observation), which
have considerably higher litterfall rates than conifers
(Binkley and others 1992). In regions where native
forests are dominated by deciduous tree species,
deforestation associated with urbanization may re-
duce organic inputs to littoral zones of urban lakes,
resulting in even greater declines in littoral detritus.
Decomposition of Sediment OrganicMatter
We observed no consistent differences in decom-
position rates between urban and undeveloped
lakes that might explain either higher total OM or
greater proportion of fine particulate OM (FPOM)
in undeveloped lakes. Biological reduction of the
coarse particulate OM (CPOM) pool occurs through
processing and ingestion by macroinvertebrates
and via microbial degradation. Both processes re-
duce CPOM while increasing the FPOM pool
(Saunders and others 1980). Despite higher densi-
ties in the undeveloped lakes of shredding caddis-
flies, which are more effective decomposers relative
to other shredder taxa (Bjelke and Herrmann
2005), decomposition in the presences of macro-
invertebrates was not significantly higher on
undeveloped lakes compared to urban lakes in any
of the treatment regimes. In addition, the trend
towards higher densities on undeveloped lakes of
detritivorous amphipods, which ingest FPOM,
could only potentially decrease the fine organic
pool in these systems.
We found no difference in decomposition be-
tween urban and undeveloped lakes despite vari-
ation in some abiotic characteristics of the two sets
of lakes. Beyond biotic activities, decomposition
rates vary according to temperature, oxygen con-
centration, nutrient levels, substrate, particle size,
turbulence, and pH. Our study lakes are similar in
terms of annual temperature regimes, though the
undeveloped lakes have a slightly higher tendency
to freeze for short periods of time in winter. The
urban lakes are mesotrophic (total epilimnetic
P = 9–10 lg l)1), whereas the undeveloped lakes
are oligotrophic (epilimnetic P = 3–4 lg l)1; Moore
and others 2003). Despite elevated nutrient levels,
however, we observed no greater overall decom-
position rates in the urban lakes.
Decomposition of particulate organic matter
varies across substrate type. We did not directly
measure the source contributions of littoral detritus
in each lake, and the trophic status of the urban
lakes suggests there might be a greater proportion
of autochthonous POM, which is more labile and
could be processed more rapidly (Hicks and others
1994), reducing the total OM pool. Given the
equivalent leaf litter inputs in both lake types,
however, different detritus composition does not
explain the pattern of organic matter we observed.
Decomposition rates of terrestrial leaf litter also
vary by litter type. For example, deciduous alder
leaves decompose more quickly than more re-
calcitrant conifer needles (Webster and Benfield
Figure 5. Proportion organic matter in surface sediments
with distance from shore on two undeveloped (filled
symbols) and two developed (open symbols) lakes in sum-
mer (A) and winter (B). Error bars are 1 SE. Asterisks
indicate statistically significant differences (Student‘s t-
test, P < 0.05).
1064 T. B. Francis and others
Page 9
1986). The riparian forest community on the
undeveloped lakes is dominated by conifers, versus
deciduous trees on urban lakes. Thus, it may be
that urban litter is decomposed more quickly,
leaving less total organic matter in shallow water
sediments. Increased litter processing, however,
would result in an accumulation of FPOM in
nearshore sediments on urban lakes, which we did
not observe.
We observed striking differences in the macro-
invertebrate community composition between ur-
ban and undeveloped lakes that may be associated
with reductions in coarse wood and organic sedi-
ments. In addition to the differences stated above in
the shredder taxa, we found a complete loss of
predatory odonates (Odonata) and grazing mayflies
(Ephemeroptera) from the urban lakes. The ab-
sence of these taxa may be associated with a suite
of alterations to urban littoral habitats, including
the loss of coarse wood, which serves as habitat,
food resource, and predation refuge. These larger
invertebrate taxa are key prey for native trout, and
their absence may portend a decline in the ability
of urban lakes to support productive native fish
populations (Schindler and others 2000).
Organic Matter Distribution andRetention
Overall, the amount of organic material in littoral
sediments in undeveloped lakes was significantly
greater than in urban lakes. Sediment organic
matter accumulated in shallow waters on undev-
eloped lakes and decreased with distance from the
shore, but on urban lakes, organic matter increased
with distance from the shore. In the 15-lake sur-
vey, we found a significant positive correlation
between the proportion of organic matter in littoral
sediments and coarse wood density, and in the fo-
cused comparison, coarse wood density was sig-
nificantly greater on the two undeveloped lakes
compared to the urban lakes. Based on these data
and the organic particle distribution, we suggest
that littoral OM accumulation results from physical
retention by coarse wood that impedes sediment
focusing and retains POM in shallow waters. This
build-up of organic matter around wood has been
extensively observed in lotic ecosystems, where
Figure 6. Size composition of organic
sediment particles with distance away
from shore on four Pacific Northwest
lakes in summer. Particles are separated
into size categories: smaller than 0.06,
0.06, 0.12, 0.18, 0.42, 1.0, 2.5 and
6.35 mm. Distributions shown are
organic proportions by mass of surface
sediments.
Figure 7. Macroinvertebrate densities on two undevel-
oped (solid bars) and two developed (open bars) lakes.
Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (Stu-
dent‘s t-test, P < 0.05), error bars are standard errors.
Urbanization and Lake Sediments 1065
Page 10
large wood adds hydraulic complexity to rivers and
streams (Bilby and Ward 1991; Bisson and Bilby
1998) and retains both coarse and fine organic
matter (Bilby 1981; Harmon and others 1986)
where it is subjected to biodegradation processes.
The generality of the relationship we have found
here between woody debris and sediment organic
matter relies on, among other things, inputs of
woody debris and production of organic matter.
Accumulation of sediment organic matter in littoral
zones is regularly observed in shoreline areas with
submerged vegetation (James and Barko 1990;
Wetzel 1990). Littoral-wetland zones are areas of
high organic matter loading and degradation
(Pieczynska 1990a; Wetzel 1990; Gude and others
2004); hence, accumulations at lake margins in
these systems are common despite the absence of
coarse wood. Lakes with significant portions of
riparian habitat in wetlands, desert, agriculture,
tundra, or otherwise lacking forest would not re-
ceive the inputs of woody debris found in these
lakes and would not fit the pattern we have ob-
served. Likewise, lakes with unforested watersheds,
such as alpine systems, may receive lower inputs of
particulate OM and not accumulate littoral detritus
to the same degree as the lakes sampled here. Al-
though the evidence is limited, existing research
shows that sediment OM is not a function of lake
trophic status (Rowan and others 1992). Instead,
sediment OM in lakes has been correlated with
maximum lake depth, lake surface area and catch-
ment area: lake area (Rowan and others 1992), al-
though we did not find such relationships here.
Human Behavior and Littoral Sediments
We did not directly monitor human behavior, so
we cannot exclude the potential that the alteration
of shorelines and littoral zones by urban lake resi-
dents contributes to the sediment patterns we ob-
served. Certainly human behavior affects the
density of coarse wood on urban lakes, as people
clear littoral zones for swimming and other recre-
ational activities. Furthermore, residents often de-
posit gravel or other non-organic substrates along
their shoreline, creating a homogenous, non-or-
ganic littoral zone (T. Francis, personal observa-
tion). Our sampling, however, captured a variety of
residential littoral zone types, including those with
gravel and those without. Another human influ-
ence on sediment composition is erosion from
lakeshore development which likely mobilizes soils
into lakes. When these lakes were initially defor-
ested at the turn of the twentieth century, as well
as during subsequent development for residential
use, there may have been intrusions of terrestrial
carbon into the lakes. These patterns could be
elucidated through paleolimnological investigation.
In addition, sediment distribution is associated with
wave action and boating can induce wave-like
water movements, even on small lakes. The urban
lakes in this study, however, restricted the use of
motors, allowing only those that propel boats at
speeds that do not generate waves. Nevertheless,
although we have observed a strong correlation
between sediment organic matter and coarse wood
density, we cannot definitively rule out human-
induced changes to littoral sediments in contrib-
uting to these patterns.
IMPLICATIONS
Most lakes in the world are net heterotrophic (Cole
and others 1994, 2000; Hanson and others 2003).
The respiration of carbon in lakes is concentrated in
littoral habitats, which are conducive to decompo-
sition and other biodegradation processes because
they are warm and oxygenated (Pieczynska 1990b).
If the presence of littoral woody debris enhances
degradation processes by retaining organic carbon
in the littoral zone, coarse wood may contribute,
albeit to an unknown extent, to lake heterotrophy
and shift the balance of carbon storage in lake sed-
iments relative to evasion to the atmosphere.
Loss of organic matter from littoral sediments has
important implications for food web structure and
ecosystem function in urban lakes. Allochthonous
particulate carbon inputs are generally considered
to support only a minor fraction of lake produc-
tivity (for example, Saunders and others 1980; and
references), yet there is some evidence that it can
be vital to secondary production in some lakes
(Pace and others 2004; Cole and others 2006).
Terrestrially derived detritus accumulates in the
shallow waters of lakes in greater amounts than
living material, and in this way acts as an energy
reservoir (Saunders and others 1980), fuelling
microbial processes and secondary production of
aquatic invertebrates that in turn support upper
trophic levels. Because most lentic biota are asso-
ciated to some degree with littoral habitats, it is
likely that the loss of coarse wood and the resulting
reduction in organic matter destabilizes lake food
webs via reduced littoral secondary productivity
and subsequent trophic decoupling. In particular,
our results suggest a decline in the density of
benthic macroinvertebrates in urban lakes, which
is likely to impair the ability of urban lakes to
support fish that rely heavily on benthic resources.
1066 T. B. Francis and others
Page 11
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation (IGERT-0114351) and the University
of Washington‘s College of Forest Resources. We
thank the staff of the UBC Malcolm Knapp Re-
search Forest for their logistical assistance and ac-
cess to Loon and Gwendoline Lakes. We are also
grateful to the residents of Star and Shady Lakes for
their assistance and patience. Matt Baker, P. Dee
Boersma, Gordon Holtgrieve, John Marzluff, and
Mark Scheuerell provided helpful comments on
earlier drafts of the article.
REFERENCES
Bayo MM, Casas JJ, Cruz-Pizarro L. 2005. Decomposition of
submerged Phragmites australis leaf litter in two highly
eutrophic Mediterranean coastal lagoons: relative contribu-
tion of microbial respiration and macroinvertebrate feeding.
Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 163:349–67.
Bilby RE. 1981. Role of organic debris dams in regulating the
export of dissolved and particulate matter from a forested
watershed. Ecology 62:1234–43.
Bilby RE, Ward J. 1991. Characteristics and function of large
woody debris in streams draining old-growth, clear-cut, and
2nd-growth forests in southwestern Washington. Can J Fish
Aquat Sci 48:2499–508.
Binkley D, Sollins P, Bell R, Sachs D, Myrold D. 1992. Biogeo-
chemistry of adjacent conifer and alder-conifer stands. Ecol-
ogy 73:2022–33.
Bisson PA, Bilby RE. 1998. Organic matter and trophic
dynamics. In: Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Eds. River ecology and
management: lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. New
York: Springer. pp 373–98.
Bjelke U, Herrmann J. 2005. Processing of two detritus types by
lake-dwelling shredders: species-specific impacts and effects of
species richness. J Anim Ecol 74:92–8.
Bryan MD, Scarnecchia DL. 1992. Species richness, composition,
and abundance of fish larvae and juveniles inhabiting natural
and developed shorelines of a glacial Iowa lake. Environ Biol
Fish 35:329–41.
Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley
AN, Smith VH. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters
with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–68.
Christensen DL, Herwig BR, Schindler DE, Carpenter SR. 1996.
Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse
woody debris in North Temperate lakes. Ecol Appl 6:1143–9.
Cole JJ, Caraco NF, Kling GW, Kratz TK. 1994. Carbon dioxide
supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science
265:1568–70.
Cole JJ, Pace ML, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF. 2000. Persistence of
net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food
web manipulations. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1718–30.
Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Pace ML, Van de Bogart MC, Hodgson JR.
2006. Differential support of lake food webs by three types of
terrestrial organic carbon. Ecol Lett 9:558–68.
Dodson SI, Lillie RA, Will-Wolf S. 2005. Land use, water
chemistry, aquatic vegetation, and zooplankton community
structure of shallow lakes. Ecol Appl 15:1191–8.
Efford IE. 1969. Energy transfer in Marion Lake, British
Columbia; with particular reference to fish feeding. Verh Int
Ver Theor Angew Limnol 17:104–8.
Elias JE, Meyer MW. 2003. Comparisons of undeveloped and
developed shorelands, Northern Wisconsin, and recommen-
dations for restoration. Wetlands 23:800–16.
France RL, Peters RH. 1995. Predictive model of the effects on
lake metabolism of decreased airborne litterfall through
riparian deforestation. Conserv Biol 9:1578–86.
Francis TB, Schindler DE. 2006. Degradation of littoral habitats
by residential development: woody debris in lakes of the Pa-
cific Northwest and Midwest, United States. Ambio 35:274–80.
Franklin JF, Dyrness CT. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and
Washington. USDA Forest Service. Gen Tech Rep. p 417.
Portland, Oregon.
Gasith A, Hasler AD. 1976. Airborne litterfall as a source of or-
ganic matter in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 21:253–8.
Gude H, Teiber P, Rolinski S, Sala M. 2004. Comparison of
production and degradation of organic matter at a littoral site
of the prealpine Lake Constance. Limnologica 34:117–23.
Hanson PC, Bade DL, Carpenter SR. 2003. Lake metabolism:
relationships with dissolved organic carbon and phosphorus.
Limnol Oceanogr 48:1112–9.
Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV,
Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR,
Lienkaember GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW. 1986. Ecology
of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res
15:133–302.
Hicks RE, Owen CJ, Aas P. 1994. Deposition, resuspension and
decomposition of particulate organic matter in the sediments
of Lake Itasca, Minnesota, USA. Hydrobiologia 284:79–91.
James WF, Barko JW. 1990. Macrophyte influences on the
zonation of sediment accretion and composition in a North-
Temperate reservoir. Arch Hydrobiol 120:129–42.
Jennings MJ, Emmons EE, Hatzenbeler GR, Edwards C, Bozek
MA. 2003. Is littoral habitat affected by residential develop-
ment and land use in watersheds of Wisconsin lakes?. Lake
Reserv Manage 19:272–9.
Jordan M, Likens GE. 1975. An organic carbon budget for an
oligotrophic lake in New Hampshire, USA. Verh Int Ver Theor
Angew Limnol 19:994–1003.
Kashian DR, Burton TM. 2000. A comparison of macroinverte-
brates of two Great Lakes coastal wetlands: testing potential
metrics for an index of ecological integrity. J Great Lakes Res
26:460–81.
Lewin W-C, Okun N, Mehner T. 2004. Determinants of the
distribution of juvenile fish in the littoral area of a shallow
lake. Freshw Biol 49:410–24.
Lindeman RL. 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology.
Ecology 23:399–417.
Marburg AE, Turner MG, Kratz TK. 2006. Natural and anthro-
pogenic variation in coarse wood among and within lakes. J
Ecol 94:558–68.
Moore JC, Berlow EL, Coleman DC, De Ruiter PC, Dong Q,
Hastings A, Johnson NC, McCann K, Melville K, Morin PJ,
Nadelhoffer K, Rosemond AD, Post DM, Sabo JL, Scow KM,
Vanni MJ, Wall DH. 2004. Detritus, trophic dynamics and
biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:584–600.
Moore JW, Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Smith D, Frodge J.
2003. Lake eutrophication at the urban fringe, Seattle region,
USA. Ambio 32:13–8.
Urbanization and Lake Sediments 1067
Page 12
Oertli B. 1993. Leaf litter processing and energy flow through
macroinvertebrates in a woodland pond (Switzerland). Oec-
ologia 96:466–77.
Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR, Van de
Bogart MC, Bade DL, Kritzberg ES, Bastviken D. 2004. Whole-
lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial support of aquatic
food webs. Nature 427:240–3.
Petersen RC, Cummins KW. 1974. Leaf processing in a wood-
land stream. Freshw Biol 4:343–68.
Pieczynska E. 1990. Lentic aquatic-terrestrial ecotones: their
structure, functions, and importance. In: Naiman RJ, Decamps
H, Eds. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial
ecotones. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization. pp 103–40.
Pieczynska E. 1990b. Littoral habitats and communities. In:
Jorgensen SE, Loffler H, Eds. Guidelines of lake management,
vol 3, Lake Shore Management. Shiga, Japan: International
Lake Environment Committee. pp 39–71.
Polis GA, Strong DR. 1996. Food web complexity and commu-
nity dynamics. Am Nat 147:813–46.
Quinlan R, Leavitt PR, Dixit AS, Hall RI, Smol JP. 2002. Land-
scape effects of climate, agriculture, and urbanization on
benthic invertebrate communities of Canadian prairie lakes.
Limnol Oceanogr 47:378–91.
Rau GH. 1976. Dispersal of terrestrial plant litter into a subalpine
lake. Oikos 27:153–60.
Rowan JB, Kalff J, Rasmussen JB. 1992. Profundal sediment
organic content and physical character do not reflect lake
trophic status, but rather reflect inorganic sedimentation and
exposure. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1431–8.
Saunders GW, Cummins KW, Gak DZ, Pieczynska E, Strask-
rabova V, Wetzel RG. 1980. Organic matter and decomposers.
In: Le Cren ED, Lowe-McConnell RH, Eds. The functioning of
freshwater ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. pp 341–92.
Scheuerell MD, Schindler DE. 2004. Changes in the spatial dis-
tribution of fishes in lakes along a residential development
gradient. Ecosystems 7:98–106.
Schindler DE, Geib SI, Williams MR. 2000. Patterns of fish
growth along a residential development gradient in north
temperate lakes. Ecosystems 3:229–37.
Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD. 2002. Habitat coupling in lake
ecosystems. Oikos 98:177–89.
Schindler DW. 1978. Factors regulating phytoplankton produc-
tion and standing crop in the world‘s freshwaters. Limnol
Oceanogr 23:478–86.
Szczepanski A. 1965. Deciduous leaves as a source of organic
matter in lakes. Bull Acad Pol Sci 13:215–7.
Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y. 2002. Fishes as integrators
of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83:2152–
61.
Webster JR, Benfield EF. 1986. Vascular plant breakdown in
freshwater ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol System 17:567–94.
Wetzel RG. 1990. Land-water interfaces: metabolic and limno-
logical regulators. Edgardo Baldi Memorial Lecture. Verh Int
Ver Theor Angew Limnol 24:6–24.
Woodford JE, Meyer MW. 2003. Impact of lakeshore develop-
ment on green frog abundance. Biol Conserv 110:277–84.
1068 T. B. Francis and others