349 ผลของการเสริมซินไบโอติกส์ ต่อสมรรถภาพการผลิตไก่เนื้อ และผลตอบแทนทางเศรษฐกิจ Effects of Synbiotics Supplementation on Broiler Productive Performance and Economic Return มนัสนันท์ นพรัตน์ไมตรี 1/* วรางคณา กิจพิพิธ 1/ ชวลิต ผึ ้ งปฐมภรณ์ 1/ ศราวุธ ม่วงเผือก 1/ เอกกมล กมลลาภวรกุล 1/ นาฏยา แบ่งลาภ 2/ และ เสาวภา เขียนงาม 1/ Manatsanun Nopparatmaitree 1/* , Warangkana Kitpipit 1/ , Chawalit Phuengpathomphorn 1/ , Sarawut Mongphuank 1/ , Ekkamon Kamonlapworaku 1/ , Nattaya Banglarp 2/ and Saowapar Khianngam 1/ (Received: 14 January 2015; Accepted: 12 June 2015) 1/ สาขาสัตวศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยีการเกษตร คณะสัตวศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยีการเกษตร มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร วิทยาเขตสารสนเทศ เพชรบุรี ตําบลสามพระยา อําเภอชะอํา จังหวัดเพชรบุรี 76120 1/ Faculty of Animal Science and Agricultural Technology, Silpakorn University, Phetchaburi IT Campus, Sampraya, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, 76120 2/ บริษัท เคเอ็มพีไบโอเทค จํากัด ตําบลคลองตําหรุ อําเภอเมืองชลบุรี จังหวัดชลบุรี 2/ K.M.P. Biotech Co., LTD. 188/9 Moo.2, Klongtumru, Muang-Chunburi, Chunburi, 20000, Thailand * Corresponding author: [email protected] or [email protected], Tel: +66-032594037-8 Abstract: The experiment was conducted to examine the utilization of synbiotics (Synbac ® ) supplementation in drinking water of broiler chickens on productive performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, small intestinal histomorphology, cecal microbiology, carcass characteristics, meat quality, fatty acid composition and economic benefit return. One hundred and eighty boilers (Ross 308 ® ; 90 male and 90 female) of one day-old were used in this study. Chicks were raised under ambient temperature and assigned to complete randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and three replications per treatment. Drinking water treatment were, synbiotics supplementation program with control, program 1, and program 2. During experiment, diets and drinking water were offered ad libitum to the birds. Results show that the inclusion of the synbiotics increase apparent digestibility of crude fiber and gross energy (P<0.05) also effected to apparent crude protein and ether extract digestibility (P<0.01). Supplementation of synbiotic had effect on villous height and surface area in duodenum (P<0.05). In addition, bird from different treatment shows increasing significant on lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus + Bifidobacterium spp. ) and Enterococci in cecum (P<0.05). However, Experiment diet did not affect other productive performance, carcass percentage, cutting percentage, physical meat quality and economic benefit return (P>0.05). In addition, supplementing synbiotics in drinking water of broiler resulted in
18
Embed
Effects of Synbiotics Supplementation on Broiler ...journal.agri.cmu.ac.th/pdf/J00129_C00970.pdf · Results show that the inclusion of the synbiotics increase apparent digestibility
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Abstract: The experiment was conducted to examine the utilization of synbiotics (Synbac®) supplementation in drinking water of broiler chickens on productive performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, small intestinal histomorphology, cecal microbiology, carcass characteristics, meat quality, fatty acid composition and economic benefit return. One hundred and eighty boilers (Ross 308®; 90 male and 90 female) of one day-old were used in this study. Chicks were raised under ambient temperature and assigned to complete randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and three replications per treatment. Drinking water treatment were, synbiotics supplementation program with control, program 1, and program 2. During experiment, diets and drinking water were offered ad libitum to the birds. Results show that the inclusion of the synbiotics increase apparent digestibility of crude fiber and gross energy (P<0.05) also effected to apparent crude protein and ether extract digestibility (P<0.01). Supplementation of synbiotic had effect on villous height and surface area in duodenum (P<0.05). In addition, bird from different treatment shows increasing significant on lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus + Bifidobacterium spp.) and Enterococci in cecum (P<0.05). However, Experiment diet did not affect other productive performance, carcass percentage, cutting percentage, physical meat quality and economic benefit return (P>0.05). In addition, supplementing synbiotics in drinking water of broiler resulted in
user
Text Box
Copyright @ Journal of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture Chiang Mai University. All rights reserved.
significantly decreasing of cholesterol content in meat. Furthermore, a result also shows that synbiotics has effect on increasing of MUFA, PUFA omega-6 and omega-9 enrich in meat. The highest essential fatty acids were obtained from program 2 supplementation of synbiotics in drinking water. This study shows that synbiotics (Synbac®) has the beneficial effects on nutrient digestibility, duodenum morphology development, improved cecal microbiology, decreased cholesterol content and increased omega-6 and omega-9 fatty acid enrich in meat of chickens fed program 2 of synbiotics in drinking water. Keywords: Synbiotics, drinking water, productive performance, and broilers
ตามวธของ AOAC (2012) และการวเคราะหองคประกอบของกรดไขมน (individual fatty acid content) ดวย GLC ตามวธของ Lepage and Roy (1986)
การวเคราะหขอมลทางสถต
นาขอมลทไดมาวเคราะหคาความแปรปรวน (Analysis of Variance: ANOVA) ตามแผนการทดลองแบบ completely randomized design (CRD) และเปรยบเทยบความแตกตางคาเฉลยระหวางกลมขอมลดวย Duncan’s new multiple range test (DMRT) ตามวธของ Steel and Torrie (1992) โดยใชโปรแกรม R (R Core Team. 2013) กาหนดคานยสาคญทใชในการทดสอบท P<0.05
Table 1 Effects of synbiotics (Synbac®) supplementation in drinking water of broiler chickens on apparent nutrient digestibility
Apparent nutrient digestibility (%)
Synbiotics (Synbac®) supplementation in drinking water of broiler chickens SEM
Control Program 1 Program 2 Dry matter 80.32 ±0.64 78.78 ±0.52 80.73 ±2.13 0.44 Crude fiber 30.67b ±7.85 31.78b ±3.46 38.89a ±0.89 1.66 Ether extract 94.57C ±0.54 95.96B ±0.20 98.20A ±0.08 0.11 Gross energy 87.62b ±0.41 89.09ab ±1.20 90.63a ±0.83 0.29 Crude protein 82.05B ±2.06 79.73B ±0.43 85.97A ±1.13 0.46
a,b Mean in the same column with difference letter are significantly difference at P≤0.05 by DMRT, A,B,C Mean in the same column with difference letter are significantly difference at P≤0.01 by DMRT.
a,b Mean in the same column with difference letter are significantly difference at P≤0.05 by DMRT, A,B,C Mean in the same column with difference letter are significantly difference at P≤0.01 by DMRT.
a,b,c Mean in the same column with difference letter are significantly difference at P≤0.05 by DMRT, A,B,C Mean in the same column with difference letter are significantly difference at P≤0.01 by DMRT.
Table 8 Effects of synbiotics (Synbac®) supplementation in drinking water on economic benefit return of broilers chicken production
Economic benefit return Synbiotics (Synbac®) supplementation in drinking water
of broiler chickens SEM Control Program 1 Program 2
Feed cost per gain1 (Baht/Bird) 62.37 ±2.88 60.60 ±2.20 60.14 ±2.76 0.65 Salable bird return2 (Baht/Bird) 84.78 ±3.52 85.80 ±2.98 86.40 ±3.12 0.45 Net profits return per bird3 (Baht/Bird) 22.41 ±1.27 25.20 ±1.32 25.26 ±1.09 0.36 Return of investment4 (%) 35.93 ±1.97 a 41.58 ±1.87b 42.00 ±1.77b 0.89
1Feed cost per gain (FCG) =(FCR x feed cost x BWG) 2Salable bird return (SBR) = (Price of live chicken (40 Baht) x BW) 3Net profits return per bird (NPR) = (SBR - FCG) 4Return of investment (ROI) = (NPR /FCG) x 100
Abdalqader, A., A. R. Al-Fataftah and G. Das. 2013. Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis and inulin supplementation on performance, eggshell quality, intestinal morphology and microflora composition of laying hens in the late phase of production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 179: 103-111.
Alander, M., J. Matt, W. Kneifel, M. Johansson, B. Kogler, R. Crittenden, T. Mattila-Sandholm and M. Saarela. 2001. Effect of galacto-oligosaccharide supplementation on human faecal microflora and on survival and persistence of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 in the gastrointestinal tract. International Dairy Journal 11: 817-825.
Amerah A. M., A. Quiles, P. Medel, J. Sanchez, M. J. Lehtinen and M. I. Gracia. 2013. Effect of pelleting temperature and probiotic spplementation on growth performance and immune function of broilers fed maize/soy-
วารสารเกษตร 31(3): 349 - 366 (2558)
363
based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 180: 55-63.
Ao, X. J., S. Yoo, T. X. Zhou, J. J. P. Wang, Q. W. Meng, L. Yan, J. H. Cho and I. H. Kim. 2011. Effects of fermented garlic powder supplementation on growth performance, blood profile and breast meat quality in broilers. Livestock Science 141: 85-89.
AOAC. 1995. Official Method of Analysis. 19th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC.
Awad, W. A., K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem and J. BÖhm. 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and symbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chicken. Poultry Science 88: 49-55.
Awad, W., K. Ghareeb and J. BÖhm. 2008. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supplemented with a symbiotic containing enterococcus feacium and oligosaccharide. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 9: 2205-2216.
Awad, W. A., J. BÖhm. E. Razzazi-fazeli, K. Ghareeb and J. Zentek. 2006. Effects of addition of a probiotic Microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological of intestinal villi of broiler chicken. Poultry Science 85: 974-979.
Daneshmand, A., G. H. Sadeghi, A. Karimi and A. Vaziry. 2011. Effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) with and without prebiotic on growth performance and some blood parameter of male broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 170: 91-96.
de Verse, M. and J. Screzenmeir. 2008. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Food Biotechnol. 111: 1-66.
Farnworth E. R., 2001. Probiotics and prebiotics, In: Wildman, R.E.C. (Ed.), REC Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Functional Food, CRC press, Boca raton, USA, 407-422.
Ghasemi P. A., M. Fatahi, L. Craker and H. Shirmardi. 2014. Chemical composition and bioactivity of essential oils of Hypericum helianthemoides, Hypericum perforatum and Hypericum scabrum. Pharmaceutical Biology 52: 175-181.
Gibson G. R. and M. B. Roberfroid. 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microflora: introducing the concept of prebiotic. Journal of Nutrition 125: 1401-1412.
Giannenas, I., D. Tontis, E. Tsalie, E. F. Chronis, D. Doukas and I. Kyriazakis. 2010. Influence of dietary mushroom Agaricus bisporus on intestinal morphology and microflora composition on broiler chickens. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 78-84.
Gomes, A. M. P. and F. X. Malcata.1999. Bifidobacteriun spp. and Lactobacillus acidofilus: Biologicl, biochemical, technological and therapeutical properties relevant for use as probiotic. Trends in Food Science and Technology 10:139-157.
Haddadin M. S., S. M. Abdulrahim, E. A. Hashlamoun and R. K. Robinson. 1996. The effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on production and purification of total lipided from animal tissue. Poultry Science 75: 491-494.
Hassanpour, H., A. Zamani Moghaddam, M. Khosravi and M. Mayahi. 2013. Effects of symbiotic on the intestinal morphology and
humoral immune response in broiler chickens. Livestock Science 153: 116-122.
Hossain, M. E., G. W. Kim, S. K. Lee and C. J. Yang. 2012. Growth performance, meat yield, oxidative stability, and fatty acid composition of meat from broiler fed diets supplemented with a medicinal plant and probiotics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25(8): 1159-1168.
Huang, C. T., C. J. Workman, D. Flies, X. Pan, A. L. Marson and G. Zhou. 2004. Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells. Immunity 21: 503-513.
Jung, S. J., R. Houde, B. Baurhoo, X. Zhao and B. H. Lee. 2008. Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a Bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth performance and fecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 87: 1694-1699.
Kalavathy, R., N. Abdullah, S. Jalaludin, M. Wong and Y. W. Ho. 2009. Effects of Lacctobacilus cultures on performance of laying hens, and total cholesterol, lipid and fatty acid composition of egg yolk. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 482-486.
Khaksefidi, A. and Sh. Rahimi. 2005. Effect of probiotic inclusion in the diet of broiler chicken on performance, feed efficiency and carcass quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18(8):1153-1156.
Lepage, G. and C. C. Roy. 1986. Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction. Journal of Lipid Research 27: 114-120.
Li, L. L., Z. P. Hou, T. J. Li, G. Y. Wu, R. L. Huang, Z. R. Tang, C. BB. Yang, J. Gong, H. Yu and X. F. Kong. 2008. Effects of dietary probiotic
supplementation on ileal digestibility of nutrients and growth performance in 1 to 42 day old broilers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88: 35-42.
Liu, X., H. Yan, L. Lv, Q. xu, C. Yin, K. Zhang, P. Wang and J. Hu. 2012. Growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus licheniformis in drinking water. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25(5): 682-689.
Lutfullah, G., T. Akhtar, I. Ahmad, M. M. A. K. Khattak, F. E. Durrani and M. S. Qureshi. 2011. Effects of probiotic on the intestinal morphology with special reference to the growth of broilers. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan 33: 129-133.
Mikulski, D., J. Jankowski, J. Naczmanski, M. Mikulska and V. Demey. 2012. Effects of dietary probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, egg traits, egg yolk cholesterol, and fatty acid profile in laying hens. Poultry Science 91: 2691-2700.
Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsirsikos, I. Palamidi, A. Arvanniti, M. Mohnl, G. Schatmayr and K. Fegeros. 2010. Effect of probiotic inclusion level in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulin, and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science 89: 588-593.
NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirement of Poultry. (9th Ed.). Washington, D. C.
Okasaki, M., S. Fujikawa and N. Matumoto. 1990. Effect of xylooligosaccharide on growth of bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria Microb. 9: 289-295
วารสารเกษตร 31(3): 349 - 366 (2558)
365
Pelicano, E. R. L., P. A. Souza, H. B. A. Souza, A. Oba, M. M. Boiago, N. M. B. L. Zeola, A. M. Scatolini, V. A. Bertanha and T. M. A. Lima. 2005. Carcass and cut yields and meat qualitative traits of broilers fed diets containing probiotics and prebiotics. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 7: 169-175.
R Core Team. 2013. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http:/www.R-project.org/
Sakamoto, K., H. Hirose, A. Onizuka, M. Hayashi, N. Futamura, Y. Kawamura and T. Ezaki. 2000. Quantitative study of change in intestinal morphology and mucous jel on total parenteral nutrition in rats. Journal of Surgical Research 94: 99-106.
Sako, T., K. Matsumoto and T. Ryuichiro. 1999. Recent progress on research and application of non-digestible galacto-oligosaccharides. International Dairy Journal 9: 69-80.
Sharifi, S. D., A. Dibamerhr, H. Lotfollahian and B. Baurhoo. 2012. Effects of flavomycin and probiotic supplementation to diets containing different sources of growth performance, intestinal morphology, apparent metabolizable energy, and fat digestibility in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 91: 918-927.
Silzewska, K., A. Nowak, Z. Libudzisz and J. Blasiak. 2010. Probiotic preparation reduced the fecal water genotoxicology in chickens fed with aflatoxin B1 contamination fodder. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 391-395
Smirnov, A., R. Perez, E. Amit-Romach, D. Sklan and Z. Uni. 2005. Mucin dynamic and microbial
population in chicken small intestine are change by dietary probiotic and antibiotic growth promoter supplementation. Journal of Nutrition 135-187.
St-Onge, M. P., E. R. Farnworth and PP. J. H. Jones. 2000. Consumption of fermented and nonfermented dairy products: effects on cholesterol concentrations and metabolism. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 71: 674-681.
Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1992. Principles and procedure statistic. 2nd Edn., McGrew-Hill Book Co., Inc., Singapore.
Teshfam, M., M. J. Gharagozlou, J. Saramodi and H. Hassanpour. 2006. Morphological alteration of the small intestine mucosa following oral administration of cadmium in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research 29: 65-68.
Tsirtsikos, P., K. fegeros, C. Balaskas, A. Kominakis, and K. M. Mountzouris. 2012. Dietary probiotic inclusion level modulates intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology on broilers. Poultry Science 91: 1860-1868.
Yalcin, S., S. Yalcin, K. Cakin, O. Eltan and L. Dagasan. 2010. Effects of dietary yeast autolysate (Saccharomyces cereviceae) on performance, egg trait, egg cholesterol content, egg yolk fatty acid composition and humeral immune response of laying hens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90: 1695-1701.
Zhang, Z. F., T. X. Zhou, X. Ao and I. H. Kim. 2012. Effect of ß-glucan and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, blood profile, relative organ weight and meat quality in broilers
fed maize-soybean meal based diets. Livestock Science 150: 419-424.
Zhou, X., Y. Wang, Q. Gu and W. Li. 2010. Effect of dietary probiotic, Bacillus coagulans, on growth performance, chemical composition, and meat quality of Guangxi Yellow chicken. Poultry Science 89: 588-593.
Zubillaga, M., R. Weill, E. Postaire, C. Goldman, R. Caro and J. Boccio. 2001. Effect of probiotic and functional foods and their use in different diseases. Nutrition Research 21: 569-579.