Effects of nanoparticles on clay stabilisation and coal permeability Research team: Archana Patel, Lei Ge, Fabio Terzini Soares, Tom Rufford, Brian Towler, Victor Rudolph School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia. Project Aims This projects aims to identify potential nanoparticles (NPs) to prevent clay swelling of the smectite clays and investigate their deployment in the coal seam gas reservoirs. The main activities include 1) screening NPs for clay stabilization, 2) optimizing NPs concentration and evaluating effectiveness and 3) investigate the effects on coal permeability. Performance of nanoparticles (NP) in distilled water and 4% KCl Effect of NP injection on coal permeability Acknowledgements CCSG 1204 project. AMCOL for providing Bentonite samples. Figure 3 shows the longevity of MgO treatment on clay swelling. Among these treatment conditions, the MgO in the presence of 2% KCl can be the most effective treatment, displaying lowest swelling index and stable swelling inhabitancy even after 40 washes. Figure 1 shows the images of a visual swelling test. The swelling index = ℎ −ℎ ℎ ,h i and h f are the initial and final height, respectively. Figure 2 suggests that except for zinc oxide all of the nanoparticles show potential to prevent clay swelling in distilled water. In the presence of 4% KCl, clay swelling was inhibited with all selected NPs. Figure 2. Swelling index of bentonite treated in distilled water and 4% KCl with 1 wt% nanoparticles. The reference lines show swelling index of clay in distilled water and 4% KCl Figure 4. Experimental method of nanoparticle injection and permeability evaluation Initial experiments were also carried out to study the effect of nanoparticle injection on coal permeability at a high nanoparticle injection volume. As indicated by 3D CT segmentation, the cleat/fracture fraction reduced from 0.88% to 0.02%. Figure 5. Effect of nanoparticle injection on coal permeability Figure 6. Recovery of permeability after de-stress and flush Figure 1. Illustration of visual swelling test method Effectiveness of NP after washing Figure 3. Effectiveness of MgO nanoparticle treatments to prevent bentonite swelling after washing KCl from the sample Conclusions • SiO 2 and MgO nanoparticles show potential to prevent clay swelling in formation water in the absence and presence of KCl. • The effects of nanoparticle on coal permeability have been examined by in-situ CT core flooding, observing permeability and cleat/fracture change with nanoparticle injection. • Future work will focus on optimising nanoparticle injection conditions to minimise the permeability drop in the coal. The NPs transportation mode will also be investigated under different stress conditions. 3D CT images in Figure 6 represent blockage of cleats and reduce cleat/fracture volume. However, the permeability can be recovered back to initial permeability after de-stress and flush as shown in Figure 6. In future work, to mitigate the impact on coal permeability, the NPs size, injection amount and dispersion will be optimised. The NPs deployment methods will also be considered. To examine long-term performance of the MgO nanoparticle treatment as a clay stabiliser compared to traditional KCl brine treatments, the solution was decanted and refreshed every 24 hrs for up to 40 times.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Effects of nanoparticles on clay stabilisation and coal permeability Research team: Archana Patel, Lei Ge, Fabio Terzini Soares, Tom Rufford, Brian Towler, Victor Rudolph
School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia.
Project Aims
This projects aims to identify potential nanoparticles (NPs)to prevent clay swelling of the smectite clays and investigatetheir deployment in the coal seam gas reservoirs.The main activities include 1) screening NPs for claystabilization, 2) optimizing NPs concentration and evaluatingeffectiveness and 3) investigate the effects on coalpermeability.
Performance of nanoparticles (NP) in distilled water and 4% KCl
Effect of NP injection on coal permeability
Acknowledgements
CCSG 1204 project. AMCOL for providing Bentonite samples.
Figure 3 shows the longevity of MgO treatment on clay swelling.Among these treatment conditions, the MgO in the presence of 2%KCl can be the most effective treatment, displaying lowest swellingindex and stable swelling inhabitancy even after 40 washes.
Figure 1 shows the images of a visual swelling test.
The swelling index =ℎ𝑓−ℎ𝑖
ℎ𝑓, hi and hf are the initial and final
height, respectively.
Figure 2 suggests that except for zinc oxide all of thenanoparticles show potential to prevent clay swelling indistilled water. In the presence of 4% KCl, clay swelling wasinhibited with all selected NPs.
Figure 2. Swelling index of bentonite treated in distilled water and 4% KCl with 1 wt% nanoparticles.
The reference lines show swelling index of clay in distilled water and 4% KCl
Figure 4. Experimental method of nanoparticle injection and permeability evaluation
Initial experiments were also carried out to study the effect ofnanoparticle injection on coal permeability at a highnanoparticle injection volume. As indicated by 3D CTsegmentation, the cleat/fracture fraction reduced from 0.88%to 0.02%.
Figure 5. Effect of nanoparticle injection on coal permeability
Figure 6. Recovery of permeability after de-stress and flush
Figure 1. Illustration of visual swelling test method
Effectiveness of NP after washing
Figure 3. Effectiveness of MgO nanoparticle treatments to prevent bentonite swelling after washing KCl from the sample
Conclusions
• SiO2 and MgO nanoparticles show potential to prevent clayswelling in formation water in the absence and presence of KCl.
• The effects of nanoparticle on coal permeability have beenexamined by in-situ CT core flooding, observing permeabilityand cleat/fracture change with nanoparticle injection.
• Future work will focus on optimising nanoparticle injectionconditions to minimise the permeability drop in the coal. TheNPs transportation mode will also be investigated underdifferent stress conditions.
3D CT images in Figure 6 represent blockage of cleats andreduce cleat/fracture volume. However, the permeability canbe recovered back to initial permeability after de-stress andflush as shown in Figure 6. In future work, to mitigate theimpact on coal permeability, the NPs size, injection amountand dispersion will be optimised. The NPs deploymentmethods will also be considered.
To examine long-term performance of the MgOnanoparticle treatment as a clay stabiliser compared totraditional KCl brine treatments, the solution was decantedand refreshed every 24 hrs for up to 40 times.
Related Documents
