International Colloquium on ELF EMF A BHK CIGRE organisation, Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009 Effects of ELF EMF on Effects of ELF EMF on human beings human beings the contact current the contact current hypothesis hypothesis Jean-Louis Lilien, University of Liège Member of BBEMG (www.bbemg.ulg.ac.be)
10
Embed
Effects of ELF EMF on human beings the contact current hypothesis
Effects of ELF EMF on human beings the contact current hypothesis. Jean-Louis Lilien, University of Liège Member of BBEMG (www.bbemg.ulg.ac.be). Contact current. Not ESD but well a 50 Hz, unperceptible current of about 100 m A. Not a risk of electrocution. 30 mA. 0,1 mA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation, Sarajevo, June 3d,
2009
Effects of ELF EMF on Effects of ELF EMF on human beingshuman beings
the contact current the contact current hypothesishypothesis
Jean-Louis Lilien, University of LiègeMember of BBEMG (www.bbemg.ulg.ac.be)
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
2
Contact currentContact current
• Not ESD but well a 50 Hz, unperceptible current of about 100 A.
Not a risk of electrocution
But a typical everyday situation in some installations
0,1 mA0,1 mA
300 x moins que 300 x moins que électrocutionélectrocution
30 mA30 mA
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
3
One biological factor of interestOne biological factor of interestthe the INTERNAL electric fieldINTERNAL electric field
WHO considers 10 mV/m as a basic minimum level able to potentially disturb biological mechanismsWHO considers 10 mV/m as a basic minimum level able to potentially disturb biological mechanisms
(WHO, 2007, page 116)(WHO, 2007, page 116)
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
4
Measuring campaign in BelgiumMeasuring campaign in BelgiumB-Field B-Field
0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10
Champ magnétique (µT)
No
mb
re d
'hab
itati
on
s
>0.4 µT>0.4 µT
Targeted group near power lines as much as possible Targeted group near power lines as much as possible to get data for the correlation between B-field and to get data for the correlation between B-field and
contact currentcontact current
Median Median near near 0,01 0,01 TT
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
5
Belgium campaign compared to Belgium campaign compared to USAUSA
0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10
Champ magnétique (µT)
No
mb
re d
'hab
itat
ion
s
Belgium
0.01 µT < typical value < 0.1 µT
>0.4 >0.4 µTµT
USA (Kheifets, 1999)
0.02 µT < typical value< 0.2 µT
>0.4 µT>0.4 µT
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
6
0 50 100 1500
10
20
30
Co
ura
nt
ind
uit
(µA
)
Distance Ligne HT - maison (m)
Pas de lien équipotentiel Lien equipotentiel complet
Contact current simulationsContact current simulations(induced by B-field near power (induced by B-field near power lines)lines)
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
7
Measuring campaign in BelgiumMeasuring campaign in Belgium Contact current as measured in 100 Contact current as measured in 100 homes.homes.
•Mean value : 8 A
•In 20% contact current > 10 µA
•In 5% contact current > 100µA
5050
8µA8µA
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
8
0,01 0,1 10,01
0,1
1
10
100
1000
Champ magnétique µT
cour
ant d
e co
ntac
t µ
A (
mes
uré)
Correlation contact current / B-Correlation contact current / B-fieldfield
International Colloquium on ELF EMFA BHK CIGRE organisation,
Sarajevo, June 3d, 2009
10
ConclusionsConclusions
– If INTERNAL 50 Hz E-field is considered as the key factor for potential biological interactions (any external source), there is no way to consider any more power lines as direct or indirect source of troubble, but contact current may be a more interesting value to consider
– The belgian case (actually llimited to 100 home sample) : mean contact current : 8µA (no troubble)
– The belgian case : 5% homes have contact current larger than 100µA, an unperceptible current which needs installation evaluation.
– No significant difference between USA and Belgium, despite very different type of installations (voltage and neutral scheme)
– Correlation between B-field and contact current actually extremely poor (with some few exception). Validated by simulations.
– link between earthing of the electrical installation and metallic circuits like water and gas conducts is missing in many places , but need to be restored as obliged by regulation. Installations must be certified regularly.