Top Banner
Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate P.E. Reynolds Canadian Forest Service Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
36

Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Dec 31, 2015

Download

Documents

jerry-mays

Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate. P.E. Reynolds Canadian Forest Service Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada. Cooperators. Ontario Forest Research Institute: R.A. Lautenschlager & F.W. Bell & University of Guelph: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Effects of Clearcut Harvesting&

Alternative Vegetation Managementon

Forest Microclimate

P.E. Reynolds

Canadian Forest Service

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Page 2: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Cooperators

Ontario Forest Research Institute:

R.A. Lautenschlager & F.W. Bell

&

University of Guelph:

A.M. Gordon, J.A. Simpson, & D.A. Gresch

Page 3: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Specials thanks to:

D.A. Buckley

Canadian Forest Service

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Retired

Page 4: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Objectives:

• To quantify treatment-related microclimatic differences resulting from harvesting & alternative vegetation management practices

• To assess the duration of these differences

Page 5: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Treatments:

• Unharvested forest (F) blocks -- 100 yrs; aspen, fir, white birch

• Clearcut control (C) -- harvested 1986 through 1988; planted with spruce

• 2 alternative herbicides, glyphosate (G) & triclopyr (T), applied August 1993

• 2 alternative cutting methods, brushsaws (B) & Silvana mower (S), September 1993

Page 6: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Methods:• Vegetation treatments applied to 4 clearcut

blocks (30-60 ha each).

• Weather stations established in F, C, B, and G treatments on 3 blocks 1994-1998

• Programmed to continuously monitor PAR, RH, & air temperatures at 0.25 & 2.0 m above forest floor & soil temps at 5 & 15 cm

• Repeated measures ANOVA on 5th yr data

Page 7: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Results:

• Are based upon daily measurements of PAR, air & soil temperatures, & RH for the period Jun 2 through October 14, 1998

• Data are means for 2 replicate blocks

• 5 years after B & G treatments

• 12 years after harvesting

• Significant treatment differences for 20 of 22 measured parameters

Page 8: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Lines fitted to data for viewing:

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AT 2 m

1998

PA

R (

uM

OL

. S

-1 .

M-2

)

-200

200

600

1000

1400

1800

2200

2600

3000

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 9: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Results:

• Lower PAR & higher RH were observed for the unharvested forest (F) compared with the clearcut control (C)

Page 10: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AT 2 m

1998

PA

R (

uMO

L . S

-1 .

M-2

)

-200

200

600

1000

1400

1800

2200

2600

3000

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 11: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AT 0.25 m

1998

PAR

(uM

OL

. S-1

. M

-2)

-200

400

1000

1600

2200

2800

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 12: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

PAR (uMol . S-1 . M-2)

Location FOR CON BRU GLY

2.0 m 619 d 789 c 1629 b 1852 a

0.25 m 395 c 437 c 699 b 1376 a

Page 13: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AT 2 m

1998

PA

R (

M-2

. D

-1)

-5

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 14: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AT 0.25 m

1998

PAR

(MO

L . M

-2 .

D-1

)

-5

5

15

25

35

45

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 15: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

PAR (Mol . M-2 . D-1)

Location FOR CON BRU GLY

2.0 m 2.2 c 3.0 c 27.2 b 34.0 a

0.25 m 0.8 c 1.5 bc 2.5 b 18.0 a

Page 16: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MINIMUM RELATIVE HUMIDITY AT 2 m

1998

HU

MID

ITY

(%

)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 17: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MINIMUM RELATIVE HUMIDITY AT 0.25 m

1998

HU

MID

ITY

(%)

10

30

50

70

90

110

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 18: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Minimum Relative Humidity (%)

Location FOR CON BRU GLY

2.0 m 58 a 53 b 52 b 43 c

0.25 m 55 a 49 b 46 b 40 c

Page 19: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Results:

• Seasonal air temperature extremes (o C), for daily highs and lows, were associated with the glyphosate (G) treatment, where non-woody vegetation was dominant (J. Sust. For. 10, No. 3/4, 2000, pp. 267-275)

Page 20: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MAXIMUM AIR TEMPERATURE AT 2 m

1998

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E (

o C

)

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 21: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MAXIMUM AIR TEMPERATURE AT 0.25 m

1998

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E (

o C

)

4

10

16

22

28

34

40

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 22: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MINIMUM AIR TEMPERATURE AT 2 m

1998

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E (

o C

)

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 23: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MINIMUM AIR TEMPERATURE AT 0.25 m

1998

AIR

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E (

o C

)

-8

-2

4

10

16

22

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 24: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Air Temperatures (o C)

Location Daily FOR CON BRU GLY

2.0 m Max 19.9 b 21.2 b 21.6 ab 22.9 a

0.25 m Max 21.0 c 21.8 bc 23.0 b 26.0 a

2.0 m Min 12.7 a 11.8 ab 10.8 b 10.8 b

0.25 m Min 11.5 a 10.3 a 8.5 b 7.8 b

Page 25: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Results:

• Mean seasonal soil temperatures at 15 cm depth (daily highs) remained highest for the glyphosate (G) treatment, and higher than for all other treatments

Page 26: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MAXIMUM SOIL TEMPERATURE AT 15 cm

1998

TEM

PE

RAT

UR

E (o

C)

7

9

11

13

15

17

19

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 27: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MAXIMUM DUFF TEMPERATURE (5 cm)

1998

TEM

PE

RAT

UR

E (o

C)

2

6

10

14

18

22

26

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 28: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Maximum Soil Temperature (o C)

Location FOR CON BRU GLY

15 cm 13.5 b 13.4 b 13.0 b 14.3 a

Duff 15.1 b 15.2 b 15.6 a 16.2 a

Page 29: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Conclusions:

• The effects of routine forestry practices in altering forest microclimate are longer-lasting than anticipated

• Changes in forest microclimate are likely contributing to global warming & to global environmental change

• The extent & significance of these contributions are yet to be determined

Page 30: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate
Page 31: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MAXIMUM RELATIVE HUMIDITY AT 2 m

1998

HU

MID

ITY

(%)

70

74

78

82

86

90

94

98

102

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 32: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MAXIMUM RELATIVE HUMIDITY AT 0.25 m

1998

HU

MID

ITY

(%)

80

84

88

92

96

100

104

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 33: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Maximum Relative Humidity (%)

Location FOR CON BRU GLY

2.0 m 92 a 91 ab 91 ab 90 b

0.25 m 98 b 98 b 99 ab 100 a

Page 34: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MINIMUM SOIL TEMPERATURE AT 15 cm

1998

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E (

o C

)

7

9

11

13

15

17

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 35: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

FOREST

CONTROL

BRUSHSAW

GLYPHOSATE

MINIMUM DUFF TEMPERATURE (5 cm)

1998

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E (

o C

)

-2

2

6

10

14

18

22

JUN 2 JUL 11 AUG 20 SEP 29

Page 36: Effects of Clearcut Harvesting & Alternative Vegetation Management on Forest Microclimate

Minimum Soil Temperature (o C)

Location FOR CON BRU GLY

15 cm 12.9 ab 12.4 b 13.2 a 13.3 a

Duff 12.8 a 12.0 ab 11.3 b 12.4 a