R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06 Effects of architectural and environmental issues on a km3 detector R. Coniglione for the NEMO collaboration Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Effects of environmental parameters on a km3 detector • Optical background • Absorption length Architectural effects on the detector effective areas R. Coniglione for the Nemo coll. NIM A 567 (2006) 489-491
16
Embed
Effects of architectural and environmental issues on a km3 detector
Effects of architectural and environmental issues on a km3 detector. R. Coniglione for the NEMO collaboration. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud. Effects of environmental parameters on a km3 detector Optical background Absorption length - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Effects of architectural and environmental issues on a km3 detector
R. Coniglione for the NEMO collaboration
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud
Effects of environmental parameters on a km3 detector
•Optical background
•Absorption length
Architectural effects on the detector effective areas
R. Coniglione for the Nemo coll. NIM A 567 (2006) 489-491
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
The environmental effects
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Simulation INPUT
ANTARES codes modified for km3 detectors + LNS improvements
- surface generation- muons with E-1 spectrum - isotropic distribution - can radius dmax/2 + 200 m
- Capo Passero absorption length (70 m @ 450 nm)- Background 35, 60, 120 kHz with offset 1000 ns- “Aart” reconstruction with different “triggers” (LNS routine for triple local coincidences reco v4r5km3)
In order to get a fair comparison, quality cuts on the reconstruction are applied to get similar angular resolution ( 1° at 1 TeV)
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
The NEMO geometry
Characteristics of the simulated km3
detector
Square array - 140 m tower spaced- number of towers 81 - number of PMTs 5832- Dimension: 1.14 · 1.14 · 0.68 = 0.88 Km3
Tower characteristics:- total height 830 m- instrumented 680 m- number of bars 18- number of PMTs per bar 4- bar length 20 m- bar vertical distance 40 m- PMT 10’’
40m
20m
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Trigger
2/2
2/4
The reconstruction procedure is based on a maximum likelihood method • all the hits with amplitude < 0.5 p.e. are rejected• A causality filter with respect to the highest amplitude hit is applied • A linear prefit is applied on a sub-set of hits that passed the following conditions (trigger condition)(they are part of a local coincidence) OR (hit amplitude >2.5 p.e.)Local coincidences = hit with 20ns+r/vlight difference in time in different PMT
Local coincidences
3/4
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Trigger and background rates
35 kHz 60 kHz 2/4 3/4 2/2
1.5p.e. 2/2 3/4
2/4 3/4 2/2
Median vs EMedian vs E Median vs E
Aeff vs E Aeff vs E Aeff vs E
• Trigger effects are strongly dependent on the background rates• Local coincidences (3/4) are relatively more efficient at higher background
rate in particular at muon energy lower than 10 TeV
120 kHz
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Effective muon area vs background rates
Even with local coincidence trigger (3/4) a stronger and stronger effective area reduction is observed with increasing background rates
The best “trigger” for each rate value is applied
35 kHz - 2/4 local coinc. 60 kHz – 3/4 local coinc. 120 kHz – 3/4 local coinc
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Effects of abs
abs 70m @450 nm abs 50m @ 450 nm
At muon energy lower than 3TeV effective areas higher than 20%
Aeff (70m)/Aeff (50m) vs E
Aeff (
ab
s 7
0m
)/A
eff (
ab
s 5
0 m
)
Aeff vs E
The ratio
20 kHz sc 50m @~450 nm -
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
The architectural comparison
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
The architectural comparison
Compromise between performance and technical feasibility
Performance-> Good angular resolution and effective areas for
•Up-going muons (E 102108 GeV) in the whole angular rangeSeveral architectures were studied with the following constraints:
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
The effective muon areas vs E
string-dh_140_20 string-d_125_16 NEMO_140
35 kHz background – abs 70m@450nm
Up-going muons
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Angular resolution vs
Up-going muons
E 102 103 GeV E 103 104 GeV
VerticalHorizontalThe “string” detectors show a worst angular resolution for near vertical muons
Q. Cut applied
string-dh_140_20 string-d_125_16 NEMO_140
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Muon effective areas vs neutrino energy
NEMOdh-140 RETd-125 RETdh-140
Median of rec vs cos
35 kHz background – abs 70m@450nm
Up-going E-2 muon neutrino spectrum
NEMOdh-140RETdh-140
Ratio =
1 TeV < Ev < 10 TeV
VerticalHorizontal
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Down-going muons
35 kHz background – abs 70m@440nm
Down-going muons (moon shadow)
The “string-d_125_16” detector shows a worst angular resolution and Aeff for down-going muons
string-dh_140_20 string-d_125_16 NEMO_140
R. Coniglione, KM3NeT, Marseille 11-12 October ‘06
Summary
A study on the possible trigger conditions on a tower based detector has been undertaken -> triple local coincidences are more efficient with increasing background rates.
Stronger and stronger reduction on effective areas with increasing background rates up to E =104 GeV.
Comparison of effective muon areas as a function of abs shows an
improvement higher than 20% for muon energy <3TeV
Architectural study on tower vs string based detector performances indicates that detectors based on strings have a bad angular resolution for E < 104 GeV up-going muons with
<35° -> A reconstruction strategy adapted to each particular geometry can improve the detector performance.