Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on Nesting Tree Swallows
Jan 04, 2016
Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on
Nesting Tree Swallows
Acid Mine Drainage (AMD)
Streams contaminated with AMD cause ecological and biological stresses by
• Low pH
• High metal concentrations
• Deposition of metal oxides
Ecological Effects of AMD
• Effects at all levels of food chain from periphyton and fungal communities upwards
• Effects on invertebrates include– Reduced abundance and biomass– Reduced species diversity– Shift in species composition from metal-
intolerant taxa to metal-tolerant taxa (mayflies shown to be more susceptible)
Effects of AMD (cont’d)
Tree Swallows• Readily use nestboxes
• Feed near their nestboxes (< 400m)
• Primarily eat emergent aquatic insects
Study Objectives
• Evaluate the relationships among metal concentrations detected in the water, benthic invertebrates and nesting tree swallows
• Evaluate the effect of streams contaminated with heavy metals on the nesting success of tree swallows
Study Area
• Central Colorado near Keystone Ski Resort
• 9 sites selected along Snake River and two tributaries (St John’s Creek and Deer Creek)
• 10-30 nestboxes erected at sites May 2003
Upper Snake River• Low pH• High metal concentrations
Deer Creek• Near neutral pH• Low metal concentrations
St John’s Creek• Near neutral pH• Low metal concentrations
Methods
Samples collected at each site included:
• Water samples
• Benthic invertebrates
• Aerial invertebrates
• Tree swallow livers and diets
Methods - Water Samples
• Collected in triplicates in 250ml Nalgene bottles on weekly basis during summer 2004
• Sampling dates are 6/17, 6/21, 6/28, 7/8, 7/15, 7/22, and 7/29
• Chemical analysis by USGS, Denver
- metal concentrations
- pH and conductivity
Methods – Benthic Invertebrates
• Surber and Ekman grabs used
• Samples collected on 6/24, 7/1, 7/8, 7/15, 7/22 and 8/1 during 2004
• Number of samples varied from site to site
• Metal concentration analysis by USGS, Denver
Methods – Aerial Invertebrates
• Assess food availability at each site
• Used aerial tow-nets that rotate in the wind
Methods – Tree Swallow Monitoring/Sampling
• Part of a larger study conducted by Christine Custer (USGS, La Crosse, WI) to analyze effects of trace metals on tree swallows
• Nestboxes monitored on weekly basis from 1st week of June to last week in July (2003 and 2004)
• Progress of nest construction, number of eggs/young recorded
• Nestling liver and diet samples collected• Metal analysis done by USGS, Denver
Tree Swallow Nests
Statistical Analysis
• Regressions between metal concentrations detected in the water, benthic invertebrates, nestling diets and livers
• Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was also used to analyze metal concentrations in the water, benthic invertebrates, nestling diets and livers
Water Quality Results
• pH lowest at MS
• Conductivity highest at MS
• MS had the highest Al, Zn, Pb and Cd concentrations for most days
• US water chemistry more similar to those along Deer Creek than MS
Water Results - pH
Water Results – Conductivity
Al Concentrations
Zn Concentrations
Benthic Invertebrates Results
• Highest number of taxa caught along Deer Creek sites
Number of taxa of invertebrates caught at each site by sampling day. No insects were caught at MS on 7/1/04.
24-Jun 1-Jul 8-Jul 15-Jul 22-Jul 1-Aug
# of taxa
# of sam.
# of taxa
# of sam.
# of taxa
# of sam.
# of taxa
# of sam.
# of taxa
# of sam.
# of taxa
# of sam.
Upper Deer 4 2 3 3 4 2 8 2 4 2 6 2
Middle Deer 6 1 7 2 11 1 7 1 5 1 8 2
Lower Deer 3 1 7 2 9 1 9 1 5 1 5 2
St John 4 1 6 4 6 2 6 3 7 3 8 5
Upper Snake 2 6 2 5 5 5 1 4 3 5 2 5
Middle Snake 3 5 NA NA 2 5 3 5 2 5 2 6
Montezuma 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 5 3 5 4 12
Denver Water 1 2 3 7 2 7 4 6 3 8 5 11
Keystone 2 5 6 7 2 8 2 7 3 7 4 8
Number of individual invertebrates caught at each site by sampling day.
24-Jun 1-Jul 8-Jul 15-Jul 22-Jul 1-Aug
# of ind.
# of sam.
# of ind.
# of sam.
# of ind.
# of sam.
# of ind.
# of sam.
# of ind.
# of sam.
# of ind.
# of sam.
Upper Deer 5 2 13 3 23 2 27 2 56 2 23 2
Middle Deer 8 1 17 2 41 1 44 1 37 1 49 2
Lower Deer 13 1 41 2 39 1 46 1 56 1 26 2
St John 9 1 15 4 23 2 26 3 38 3 53 5Upper Snake 23 6 2 5 35 5 77 4 87 5 94 5Middle Snake 3 5 NA NA 49 5 79 5 80 5 67 6
Montezuma 20 2 11 3 25 3 25 5 20 5 14 12Denver Water 1 2 3 7 20 7 31 6 18 8 25 11
Keystone 2 5 16 7 3 8 11 7 30 7 27 8
Metal Concentrations in BenthicInvertebrates
• For benthic invertebrates, most of the highest metal concentrations were detected at MD and MS
• Highest average Al, Co, Mn, Ni, and Pb, concentrations at MD
• Highest average Cd, Cr, Zn concentrations at MS
• Highest average Fe concentration at US• Huge contrast to water samples.
Fe Concentrations in Invertebrates
Al, Mn, Zn concentrations
Cu and Pb Concentrations
Cd, Co, Cr and Ni concentrations
Aerial Invertebrate Results
• Based on number of individuals caught, no significant difference among the sites
• Over 60% of invertebrates belonged to the Order Diptera
• Most invertebrates between 3-8mm; few Lepidoptera and Trichoptera
• Invertebrates with larger biomass such as Odonota, Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera were not caught at any sites
• Does not seem to be any difference in food availability for the tree swallows
Nest Occupancy Rates
# of nests
available
2003 2004
Total Occupied
TS
MC
VG
MB
Percent Occupied
Total Occupied
TS
MC
VG
MB
Percent Occupied
Upper Deer 10 1 1 0 0 0 10 3 1 0 1 1 30
Middle Deer 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lower Deer 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 33
St John 13 1 1 0 0 0 8 4 1 3 0 0 31
Upper Snake 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 8
Middle Snake 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 10
Montezuma 18 4 3 1 0 0 22 8 3 4 1 0 44
Denver Water 14 2 2 0 0 0 14 1 1 0 0 0 7
Keystone 20 7 7 0 0 0 35 10 7 3 0 0 50
Overall 126 15 10 30 21
Interaction between Water Quality, Benthic Invertebrates, and Tree
Swallows
• PCA of metal concentrations in water quality, invertebrates, and tree swallow livers
• Correlation between metal concentrations in water quality, invertebrates, tree swallow diets and nestlings
Correlation Between Metals in Water and Bird Samples
Water and Liver Water and Diet
r2 values P-values r2 values P-values
Cd 0.46 0.07 0.05 0.60
Co 0.06 0.55 0.01 0.87
Cu 0.19 0.28 0.04 0.63
Fe 0.81 0.0022 0.00 0.92
Mn 0.47 0.06 0.13 0.14
Pb 0.19 0.29 0.07 0.52
Zn 0.28 0.17 0.20 0.26
Correlation in Metals Between Water and Benthic Invertebrate
Samples
r2 values P-values
Al 0.04 0.61
Cd 0.10 0.40
Co 0.00 0.87
Fe 0.30 0.13
Mn 0.09 0.43
Pb 0.09 0.45
Zn 0.17 0.26
Correlation Between Metals in Nestling Diets, Livers and Invertebrates
Diet and Liver (n=17)
Diet and Invertebrates (n=8)
r2 p-values r2 P-values
Al NA NA 0.00 0.98
Cd 0.00 1.00 0.08 0.49
Co 0.62 0.02 0.07 0.53
Cr 0.38 0.11 0.12 0.40
Cu 0.64 0.02 0.05 0.61
Fe 0.10 0.45 0.04 0.64
Mn 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.98
Pb 0.35 0.12 0.02 0.71
Zn 0.20 0.26 0.25 0.20
Correlation in Metals Between Benthic Invertebrate and Liver
Samples
r2 P-values
Cd 0.77 0.004
Co 0.04 0.64
Cr 0.70 0.010
Cu 0.09 0.48
Fe 0.12 0.41
Pb 0.46 0.07
Zn 0.76 0.005
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
• Principal Component Analysis was used to analyze metal concentrations in the water, macroinvertebrate samples, nestling diets and livers.
• PCA reduces the dimensionality of a large set of data by transforming a number of correlated variables into a smaller number of uncorrelated variables (principal components)
• Takes metal concentrations (correlated variables) in samples and transforms them into principal components
PCA – Metal Concentrations in Water Samples
PC1 PC2
Al 0.3565 -0.15
Cd 0.3503 -0.0836
Co 0.3712 -0.1742
Cu 0.3729 -0.1645
Fe 0.3247 -0.0774
Mn 0.3601 0.0931
Ni 0.3717 -0.1849
Pb 0.162 0.7578
Zn 0.2718 0.5386
PCA – Metal Concentrations in Benthic Invertebrates
PC1 PC2
Al -0.3355 0.3471
Cr -0.3055 -0.3009
Mn -0.3343 0.0574
Fe -0.1281 -0.4951
Co -0.3487 0.2092
Ni -0.3881 -0.0195
Cu -0.0695 0.6491
Zn -0.3463 -0.1579
Cd -0.3605 -0.2014
Pb -0.3727 0.0979
PCA – Metal Concentrations in Nestling Diets
PC1 PC2
Al -0.1539 -0.6128
Cr -0.3271 0.1865
Mn -0.3685 -0.2803
Fe -0.3504 -0.2803
Co -0.3462 -0.1807
Ni -0.2741 -0.2577
Cu -0.2697 0.5051
Zn -0.3838 0.1091
Cd -0.3345 0.3353
Pb -0.2896 -0.1691
PCA – Invertebrate Composition
Subscripts 1,2,3,4,5, and 6 denotes sampling days 6/24, 7/1, 7/8, 7/15, 7/22 and 8/1 respectively
Discussion – Water Samples
• Water samples are important for understanding overall water quality
• Poor indicator of nest occupancy rates• Poor correlation between metals in water
and in benthic invertebrates• Significant correlation between Fe
concentrations in water and nestling diet• Poor correlation between all metal
concentrations in water and nestling livers
Discussion – Metal Concentrations in Benthic Invertebrates
• Metal concentrations in benthic invertebrates are good predictors of nest occupancy rates for a site
• Significant correlation between Cd, Cr and Zn concentrations between benthic invertebrates and nestling livers
Discussion
• Correlation may be affected by averaging metal concentrations in nestling livers, diets and invertebrates
• Unclear why metal concentrations in benthic invertebrates at MD is so high; sediment and *aufwuchs samples should be included in future studies
*aufwuchs - biotic and abiotic material accumulating on submerged surfaces
ConclusionAMD does have an effect on nesting
tree swallows:• tree swallows seem to be avoiding sites
where metal concentrations in benthic invertebrates are high
• high correlation between Cd, Cr and Zn concentrations between benthic invertebrates and nestling livers