Page 1
Effect of gypsum on proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 mouse
osteoblastic cells
Á. Lazáry, B. Balla, J.P. Kósa, K. Bácsi, Z. Nagy, I. Takács, P.P. Vargaa, G. Speer, P.
Lakatos
1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2/a, Budapest, H-1083
Hungary,
a Center of Spinal Disorders, Buda Health Center, Királyhágó u. 1-3., Budapest, H-1126
Hungary
Keywords: calcium sulfate, bone graft, gene expression, osteoinduction, bone healing
Corresponding author: Áron Lazáry MD, 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis
University, Korányi S. u. 2/a, Budapest, H-1083 Hungary. Tel.: +36 1 2100278/1566; Fax:
+36 1 2104874; E-mail address: [email protected]
Running title: Effect of gypsum on osteoblasts
* Title Page
Page 2
Abstract
Recently, calcium sulfate dihydrate has been demonstrated as safe biodegradable
osteoconductive bone void filler. However, its exact mechanism of action on bone cells is yet
unknown. In this study, the influence of gypsum on gene expression and proliferation of
MC3T3-E1 mouse pre-osteoblastic cells was investigated. Cells were cultured on gypsum
disc, slice, polymethylmethacrylate, or plastic culture plate for 15 days. Cell viability, alkaline
phosphatase (ALP) activity and expression profile of 15 genes involved in bone metabolism
were measured in cultures. Cell proliferation on gypsum was increased by almost twofold,
while an inhibitory effect of polymethylmethacrylate on proliferation rate of osteoblasts was
noted. Cells cultured on gypsum disc surface exhibited an increased ALP activity and
markedly different gene expression profile. Quantitative real-time PCR data indicated the
expression of genes that might provide a basis for an osteoinductive potential. MC3T3-E1
cells expressed genes typical of bone fracture healing like type II collagen and fibronectin 1.
These effects might be related to the calcium content of gypsum and mediated likely via
SMAD3. Our results suggest that gypsum can support new bone formation by its calcium
content and modulatory effect on gene expression profile of bone cells.
* Abstract
Page 3
1
Introduction
The use of calcium sulfate as bone void filler has a long clinical history. In the middle
of the last century, Peltier at al. [1] collected extensive data supporting the efficiency and
safety of Plaster of Paris (calcium sulfate hemihydrate). A multicenter trial was published by
Kelly at al. [2] in 2001 where authors have used Osteoset® (surgical grade calcium sulfate,
Wright Medical Technology, Arlington TN) to fill bone defects caused by benign bone
tumors, trauma, cyst etc. altogether in 109 cases. They concluded that surgical grade calcium
sulfate is reliable, convenient, safe and readily available bone graft substitute that yields
consistent results. Calcium sulfate has been recently introduced in new fields of indications.
Borrelli at al. [3] have successfully treated 26 patients who had an operation of a nonunion
osseous defect caused by trauma with a mixture of autogenous iliac bone and Osteoset®. In
2005, Chen at al. [4] published the use of calcium sulfate in posterolateral spine fusion. Their
conclusion was that surgeons could use calcium sulfate combined with locally harvested
morselized bone as an artificial bone expander with a good fusion rate.
Gypsum – the dihydrate form of calcium sulfate (CaSO4 * 2 H2O) – can be found in
nature, where the mineral is one perfect crystal, in contrast to gypsum made from Plaster of
Paris – hemihydrate form of calcium sulfate (CaSO4 * ½ H2O) – where a lot of small crystals
develop next to each other. Gypsum dissolves weakly in water to Ca2+ and SO42-.
The extracellular calcium concentration in sites of bone remodeling has been measured
as high as 40 mM [5]. Moderate high extracellular Ca2+ is a chemotactic and proliferating
signal for osteoblasts and stimulate the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts [6-8],
suggesting that extracellular calcium plays an important role in the regulation of bone cells.
A number of positive clinical experiences are available with calcium sulfate in bone
substitution procedures, however, the exact mechanism of action of calcium sulfate is poorly
understood. The objective of the present study was to examine the Ca2+ concentration above
* Manuscript
Page 4
2
gypsum surfaces, as well as to demonstrate the importance of crystal structure of gypsum in
bone substitution and to study the molecular effects of gypsum on osteoblasts compared with
other (polymethylmethacrylate - PMMA) bone substitute materials generally used in clinical
practice.
Materials and Methods
Cell cultures
MC3T3-E1 mouse pre-osteoblast cells were used for cell cultures. Cells were fed
twice a week with α-MEM (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 10% fetal
calf serum and antibiotics (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). There was a standard
Ca2+ level of 1.8 mM and a concentration of ascorbic acid of 25 g/ml in the culture medium.
Cultures were grown in 5% CO2 at 37°C and 85% humidity.
Culture surfaces
Cells were plated on gypsum disc, mineral gypsum slice, PMMA and plastic culture
plate (CP). Gypsum disc was prepared by suspending heat-sterilized CaSO4* ½ H2O (Sigma-
Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) in distilled water in 50% weight concentration. Mineral
gypsum slices were cut from a gypsum crystal mined in Hungary. These slices were sterilized
in a formaldehyde sterilizer. PMMA surface was made by extra low viscosity bone cement
(Cemex® XL – Tecres S.p.A., Verona, Italy).
Detection of Ca2+ concentration
Ca2+ level was measured from culture media to determine the base Ca2+ concentration
above different forms of gypsum, such as gypsum discs and mineralized gypsum slices on 3,
Page 5
3
6, 10, 14 and 21 days. In order to measure it, 0.5 ml of culture medium was diluted with α-
MEM to 5 ml and an Olympus AU2700 analyzer (Olympus Life and Material Science Europa
GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used to determine total Ca2+ concentration based on reaction
between Ca2+ and o-cresolphthalein.
Proliferation assay
MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts were plated at 10.400 cells per cm2 surface area on different
forms of gypsum, PMMA and CP. In case of some CP cultures, 150 μl of 0.5 M CaCl2 was
added to 3 ml medium to achieve a final Ca2+ concentration of 25.5 mM. We used CellTiter-
Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega Co., Madison, WI, USA) to determining
the number of viable cells in cultures. At 4h, and 28h after plating, plates were centrifuged for
10 min at 1000 rpm to bring cells floating in the media to the bottom of the plate and medium
was discarded. A mixture 250 μl CellTiter-Glo® reagent and 250 μl α-MEM was added in
each cultures. Plates were shaken for 3 minutes and incubated at room temperature for 10
minutes. Luminescence intensity was directly proportional to ATP amount and number of
viable cells.
Determination of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity
Cell cultures were supplemented with osteogenic medium containing 10 mM β-
glycerol-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) and 25 μg/ml ascorbic acid
(Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) to ALP study. ALP activity was measured from
the culture media after 15 days of culture with p-nitrophenil-phosphate reaction using an
Olympus AU2700 analyzer as it is described in users manual. ALP activity was normalized to
protein quantity of samples measured by NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer
(NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) at 280 nm after digesting of attached cells
Page 6
4
using CellLyticTM cell lysis reagent (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA).
Gene expression study
MC3T3-E1 cells were plated with non-supplemented α-MEM and with medium
supplemented with 25 mM CaCl2 on plastic culture plate, on gypsum disc, as well as on
PMMA to determine the effect of Ca2+ concentration of 25.5 mM and the effect of gypsum
surface on gene expression profile. Total RNA was isolated from cell cultures of 15 days
using High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Manheim, Germany). RNA
quantity and quality were controlled by NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer at 260 nm.
Ten μl of total RNA (50 ng/μl) was incubated with 600 ng random hexamers for 8 min at
65°C. 200 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase, 100 nmol dNTP, 20 U RNazin and 4 μl m-MLV
5x buffer were added to reaction mixture (all reagents of reverse transcription were
purchased form Promega Co., Madison, WI, USA). Final volume of 20 μl of cDNA was
synthesized at 37°C under 60 min. cDNA was amplified by real-time PCR using TaqMan®
Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). Reaction volume was
20 μl containing 1 μl cDNA, 10 μl TaqMan® 2x Universal PCR Master Mix NoAmpErase
UNG, 1 μl predesigned and validated gene-specific TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay 20x
and 8 μl water. ABI Prism 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA,
USA) was used to amplify the 15 selected genes (Table 1.) from each sample in three parallel
runs on a 96-well optical reaction plate (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) with the
following protocol: 10 minutes denaturizing at 95 °C, and 50 cycles of 15 sec denaturizing at
95 °C, 1 min annealing and extension at 60 °C. Housekeeping gene of GAPDH was used as
internal control in reactions. Relative quantification studies were made from collected data
with 7500 System SDS software 1.3.
Page 7
5
Statistics
Final data are presented as the means of at least three independent measurements. Test
data were analyzed using the SPSS for Windows, release 13.0.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,
USA). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M.). Statistical analysis
was performed using unpaired Student’s t-test with a p value of 0.01 or less considered
significant.
Results
Ca2+ concentration in culture medium above gypsum
The mean value of Ca2+ concentration above gypsum discs and mineral gypsum slices
with and without cells was 25.48 ± 0.83 mM after 3 days of culture, and there was no
significant difference among different experimental setups.
Cell shape
Shape of MC3T3-E1 cells was different depending on various culture conditions as
shown on Figure 1. Cells were rather spindle-shaped on gypsum discs (A, B) compared to
culture plates where they were more cubical (F). MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts could not adhere to
mineral gypsum slices (C). This spindle-shaped morphological change could also be noted on
culture plates when medium was supplemented with Ca2+ to a final Ca2+ concentration of 25.5
mM (E). Degenerated and necrotic cells appeared in a high ratio on PMMA surface (D).
Cell viability assay
Page 8
6
Osteoblasts were viable on gypsum discs and they were able to proliferate on it with
an increased ratio compared to PMMA where cells were inhibited to grow. Growth rate of
MC3T3-E1 cells on gypsum discs were similar to plastic culture plates using medium
supplemented with 25 mM of CaCl2 (Figure 2.).
Alkaline phosphatase activity on gypsum
After 15 days of culture, alkaline phosphatase activity measured from supernatants
was significantly higher on gypsum discs and culture plates with Ca2+-supplemented medium
than on culture plates with normal Ca2+ and PMMA. SMAD3 expression in the different cell
cultures has changed with the same tendency (Figure 3.).
Effect of gypsum surface and high Ca2+ level on gene expression profile of MC3T3-E1
osteoblasts
Gene expression data were determined from cultures of 15 days and were normalized
to the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) of the same
culture. Relative expression of studied genes in different cultures is shown on Figure 4.
A different gene expression profile was observed with quantitative real-time PCR on
gypsum compared to culture plate with standard Ca2+. Relative expression of type II collagen
(COL2A1) was more than 130-fold higher (p<0.001) on gypsum surface. Expression of
fibronectin 1 (FN1), SMAD3 and SMAD6 have also significantly increased in cells cultured
on gypsum. Gene expression of type I collagen (COL1A1) was 12-fold increased (p<0.001)
on culture plate with standard Ca2+. Amount of gene specific mRNA of decorin (DCN) and
bone morphogenic protein 4 (BMP4) were decreased on gypsum. Bone sialoprotein (BSP),
osteocalcin (BGLAP) and calcium sensor (CASR) was not expressed in detectable amount on
gypsum disc.
Page 9
7
When Ca2+ concentration was increased in the standard medium to the extent of that
present in the medium above gypsum discs, an 80-fold increase in COL2A1 and a 20-fold
decrease in COL1A1 expression was seen in cultures with high Ca2+ level. SMAD6 and
SMAD3 expressions also significantly increased due to Ca2+ supplementation, similarly to
that seen in gypsum disc cultures. Amount of mRNA of DCN, BMP4 and BSP was decreased
in the presence of high Ca2+ level. CASR and BGLAP have been expressed in cells cultured
in standard α-MEM containing 1.8 mM Ca2+ but were not detectable in cultures with 25.5
mM extracellular Ca2+. The expression profile in osteoblasts cultured in high Ca2+ medium
was similar to that of cells grown above gypsum disc.
MC3T3-E1 cells on gypsum disc expressed a large amount of COL2A1 compared to
PMMA (51-fold difference, p<0.001), while expression of COL1A1 was 7-fold higher on
PMMA. FN1, SMAD6 and SMAD3 were also overexpressed on gypsum disc but expression
of BMP4 and DCN were significantly lower than on PMMA. CASR, BGLAP and BSP were
not expressed on gypsum disc while detectable amount of gene specific mRNA of these genes
was measured in cultures on PMMA. The expression profile in osteoblasts cultured on
PMMA was similar to that of cells grown in culture plates with standard calcium
concentration.
Discussion
In our study, we found that osteoblastic cells can proliferate on gypsum disc with a
significantly higher rate than on PMMA. Physical structure of gypsum appears to be
important for the proper adherence of osteoblasts to surface. Cells cannot attach to mineral
gypsum slices with perfect crystal structure that is not accessible for osteoblasts. However,
MC3T3-E1 cells can adhere to gypsum disc surface when it has been developed from Plaster
Page 10
8
of Paris (CaSO4-hemihydrate) by adding water. In this form of gypsum, a number of smaller
crystals are located side by side ensuring a large molecular surface that can be utilized by
cells for proliferation and matrix production. Cells are more spindle-shaped on gypsum likely
due to the large Ca2+ content of CaSO4-dihdyrate.
ALP activity is a marker of osteoblastic activity, i.e. bone turnover and bone
remodeling. Its level in serum increases during bone healing after fracture [9,10]. Bone cells
adhered to gypsum surface can be stained for alkaline phosphatase [11]. Winn et al. [12] have
reported a decrease in the proliferation ratio and ALP activity of osteoblasts cultured on
surgical grade calcium sulfate pellets. However, they found that ALP activity of these cultures
depends on culture conditions. ALP activity and mineralization of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast
cells are under the influence of extracellular Ca2+ [7,8], and it is likely to be related to the
expression of SMAD3 gene (a critical component of TGFβ signaling pathway) [13]. We have
found an increase in ALP activity in the presence of high Ca2+ in culture medium. In cultures
on gypsum disc and culture plate with Ca2+ supplementation, SMAD3 expression was also
higher than in cultures with standard Ca2+ concentration or on PMMA. This result suggests
that stimulatory effect of high extracellular Ca2+ on ALP activity is mediated, at least partly,
via SMAD3, a transcription factor known to participate in bone formation and healing [14].
In the presence of highly expressed SMAD3, transcription of late markers of
osteogenic differentiation, such as BGLAP and BSP, were decreased or undetectable. These
findings support the results of Sowa at al. [13] that SMAD3 stimulates ALP activity and
mineralization but inhibits osteocalcin expression in MC3T3-E1 cells. They also described
that TGF treatment or SMAD3 transfection affected the shape of osteoblastic cells. As we
have also found, cells are rather spindle shaped in cases of high SMAD3 expression. Changes
in the expression of SMAD6 shown in our experiments also corroborate the important role of
Page 11
9
TGFβ-signaling pathway in osteoblast differentiation. SMAD6 has been demonstrated to have
a role in the negative feedback loop of this process [15].
Our in-vitro results indicated that MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells differentiate in
distinct ways in different culture conditions used in this study. Gene expression of
extracellular matrix components has markedly changed depending on the different culture
surfaces. The expression profile above gypsum disc has changed to reflect repair processes in
bone. Probably high extracellular Ca2+ level has initiated these effects on different types of
collagen and other small matrix component gene expression since these changes could partly
be reproduced on plastic plates filled with high Ca2+ medium. Recent studies have described
that during bone repair processes an overexpression of COL2A1 and FN1 can be detected
[16,17], and newly formed healing bone can be characterized by the presence of COL2A1
expressed in active osteoblasts and not in chondrocytes [18]. FN1 can play a role in the
scarless wound healing of fractured bone [16]. DCN – like other proteoglycans in bone –
participates in collagen assembly and function but it also acts in embryogenesis and bone cell
differentiation [19]. The gene expression pattern observed above gypsum was identical in our
experiments.
Many authors have supposed that calcium sulfate dihydrate is a safe biodegradable
bone void filler [20,21]; its slow absorption give possibility to fibrovascular tissue ingrowth,
neovascularization [22], and new bone formation [23] in the defect. Walsh et al. [24] have
suggested the idea of an osteoinductive effect elicited by calcium sulfate that was based on
their finding of a high amount of TGF in bone void filled with calcium sulfate pellets. This
effect could be related to the local acidity caused by the dissolution of the pellets.
Page 12
10
Conclusion
Cells plated on gypsum disc express genes important in new bone formation with
different expression ratio compared to polymethylmethacrylate, generally used as a bone void
filler, suggesting that gypsum provides a more efficient environment for bone repair. Thus,
our results underline the former suggestion that gypsum is not only a “passive”
osteoconductive material but it might also has a potential to ostoinductivity due to its special
crystal structure and high calcium content, however further investigations – implantation
experiment in non-osseous tissues e.g. – are required to confirm it.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by grants from NKFP-1A/002/2004 and NKFP-1A/007/2004.
Page 13
References
[1] Peltier LF. The use of plaster of paris to fill defects in bone. Clin Orthop. 1961; 21:1-31.
[2] Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, Hartjen C, Watson JT, Kim PT. The use of a surgical
grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: Results of a multicenter trial. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 2001; (382):42-50.
[3] Borrelli J,Jr, Prickett WD, Ricci WM. Treatment of nonunions and osseous defects with
bone graft and calcium sulfate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (411):245-254.
[4] Chen WJ, Tsai TT, Chen LH, Niu CC, Lai PL, Fu TS, McCarthy K. The fusion rate of
calcium sulfate with local autograft bone compared with autologous iliac bone graft for
instrumented short-segment spinal fusion. Spine. 2005; 30(20):2293-2297.
[5] Silver IA, Murrills RJ, Etherington DJ. Microelectrode studies on the acid
microenvironment beneath adherent macrophages and osteoclasts. Exp Cell Res. 1988;
175(2):266-276.
[6] Yamaguchi T, Chattopadhyay N, Kifor O, Butters RR,Jr, Sugimoto T, Brown EM.
Mouse osteoblastic cell line (MC3T3-E1) expresses extracellular calcium (Ca2+)-sensing
receptor and its agonists stimulate chemotaxis and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. J
Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13(10):1530-1538.
[7] Yamauchi M, Yamaguchi T, Kaji H, Sugimoto T, Chihara K. Involvement of calcium-
sensing receptor in osteoblastic differentiation of mouse MC3T3-E1 cells. Am J Physiol
Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 288(3):E608-16.
[8] Nakade O, Takahashi K, Takuma T, Aoki T, Kaku T. Effect of extracellular calcium on
the gene expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -4 of normal human bone cells.
J Bone Miner Metab. 2001; 19(1):13-19.
* References
Page 14
[9] Obrant KJ, Ivaska KK, Gerdhem P, Alatalo SL, Pettersson K, Vaananen HK.
Biochemical markers of bone turnover are influenced by recently sustained fracture.
Bone. 2005; 36(5):786-792.
[10] Veitch SW, Findlay SC, Hamer AJ, Blumsohn A, Eastell R, Ingle BM. Changes in bone
mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17(3):364-
372.
[11] Sidqui M, Collin P, Vitte C, Forest N. Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of
isolated osteoclasts on calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Biomaterials. 1995; 16(17):1327-
1332.
[12] Winn SR, Hollinger JO. An osteogenic cell culture system to evaluate the
cytocompatibility of osteoset, a calcium sulfate bone void filler. Biomaterials. 2000;
21(23):2413-2425.
[13] Sowa H, Kaji H, Yamaguchi T, Sugimoto T, Chihara K. Smad3 promotes alkaline
phosphatase activity and mineralization of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner
Res. 2002; 17(7):1190-1199.
[14] Balooch G, Balooch M, Nalla RK, Schillin S, Filvaroff EH, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ,
Ritchie RO, Derynck R, Alliston T. TGF-beta regulates the mechanical properties and
composition of bone matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(52):18813-18818.
[15] Sugama R, Koike T, Imai Y, Nomura-Furuwatari C, Takaoka K. Bone morphogenetic
protein activities are enhanced by 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate through
suppression of Smad6 expression in osteoprogenitor cells. Bone. 2006; 38(2):206-214.
[16] Rundle CH, Wang H, Yu H, Chadwick RB, Davis EI, Wergedal JE, Lau KH, Mohan S,
Ryaby JT, Baylink DJ. Microarray analysis of gene expression during the inflammation
and endochondral bone formation stages of rat femur fracture repair. Bone. 2006;
38(4):521-529.
Page 15
[17] Heiner DE, Meyer MH, Frick SL, Kellam JF, Fiechtl J, Meyer RA,Jr. Gene expression
during fracture healing in rats comparing intramedullary fixation to plate fixation by
DNA microarray. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(1):27-38.
[18] Chiba S, Okada K, Lee K, Segre GV, Neer RM. Molecular analysis of defect healing in
rat diaphyseal bone. J Vet Med Sci. 2001; 63(6):603-608.
[19] Corsi A, Xu T, Chen XD, Boyde A, Liang J, Mankani M, Sommer B, Iozzo RV,
Eichstetter I, Robey PG, Bianco P, Young MF. Phenotypic effects of biglycan deficiency
are linked to collagen fibril abnormalities, are synergized by decorin deficiency, and
mimic ehlers-danlos-like changes in bone and other connective tissues. J Bone Miner
Res. 2002; 17(7):1180-1189.
[20] Coetzee AS. Regeneration of bone in the presence of calcium sulfate. Arch Otolaryngol.
1980; 106(7):405-409.
[21] Bucholz RW. Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat
Res. 2002; (395):44-52.
[22] Tay BK, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone
substitutes. mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;
30(4):615-623.
[23] Hadjipavlou AG, Simmons JW, Yang J, Nicodemus CL, Esch O, Simmons DJ. Plaster of
paris as an osteoconductive material for interbody vertebral fusion in mature sheep.
Spine. 2000; 25(1):10-5; discussion 16.
[24] Walsh WR, Morberg P, Yu Y,Yang JL, Haggard W, Sheath PC, Svehla M, Bruce WJ.
Response of a calcium sulfate bone graft substitute in a confined cancellous defect. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (406):228-236.
Page 16
Table 1. List of selected genes for gene expression study
Figure 1. Cell shape of MC3T3-E1 cells on different culture surfaces (cultures of 3 days,
standard hematoxilyn staining)
A. gypsum disc, 100x; B. gypsum disc, 600x; C. mineral gypsum slice, 40x; D.
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), 100x; E. culture plate with Ca2+ concentration of 25.5
mM, 100x; F. culture plate with Ca2+ level of 1.8 mM, 100x.
Figure 2. Changes of cell number in a 24 h incubation period on different surfaces
Proliferation ratio (PR) on gypsum disc (GYPS) /PR: 1.89 ± 0.091/ was significant higher
than on polymethylmetacrylate bone cement (PMMA) /PR: 0.914 ± 0.052/ and it is not
different to PR on culture plate when medium was supplemented with 25 mM Ca2+ (CP25)
/PR: 2.07 ± 0.060/ (p>0.05). PR was 2.38 ± 0.063 on culture plate without Ca2+
supplementation (data not shown). (*:p<0.01, **:p<0.001)
Figure 3. A. Alkaline phosphatase activity in culture medium above different culture surfaces
ALP activity on gypsum disc (GYPS) was 23.14 ± 4.55 U/g protein, and it was significantly
higher than ALP activity on culture plate (CP), but it was not significantly different from
ALP activity on culture plates when medium was supplemented with 25 mM Ca2+ (CP25)
/ALP: 30.07+-3.04/ (p>0.05). A significant 6-fold increase of ALP activity was detected
between cultures on gypsum disc and cell cultures on polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) /ALP:
4.08 ± 0.62 U/g protein/. This difference was also noted comparing cells on culture plate with
Ca2+-supplemented medium to cells on culture plate without Ca2+ supplementation (CP)
/ALP: 4.44±0.52/. (*:p<0.01, **:p<0.001)
B. Relative gene expression of SMAD3 on different culture surfaces after 15 days
Captions
Page 17
SMAD3 expression was 2.2-fold higher on gypsum disc (GYPS) surface than on
polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) and 2.6-fold higher than on culture plate (CP). On culture
plates, in case of 25 mM Ca2+ supplementation (CP25) SMAD3 expression increased 3-fold.
(*:p<0.01, **:p<0.001)
Figure 4. Changes of gene expression due to high extracellular Ca2+ and gypsum (see also
Figure 3/b.)
Cells were cultured on culture plate with standard -MEM (CP), on culture plate with -
MEM containing 25.5 mM Ca2+ (CP25), on gypsum disc (GYPS) and on
polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) for 15 days. Relative expression of selected genes
normalized to GAPDH of each sample are shown in cases where increase or decrease was
1.75-fold or more, and significant (*: p<0.01, **:p<0.001, †: studied gene was not expressed
in detectable amount in this culture)
Page 18
Table 1.
Assay IDGene
SymbolGene Name General function
Mm00455918_m1 BGN biglycanExtracellular matrix structural
protein
Mm00432087_m1 BMP4bone morphogenetic
protein 4
Signaling molecule / TGF-beta
superfamily
Mm00432109_m1 BMP8abone morphogenetic
protein 8a
Signaling molecule / TGF-beta
superfamily
Mm00801666_g1 COL1A1procollagen, type I,
alpha 1
Extracellular matrix structural
protein
Mm00483888_m1 COL1A2procollagen, type I,
alpha 2
Extracellular matrix structural
protein
Mm00491889_m1 COL2A1procollagen, type II,
alpha 1
Extracellular matrix structural
protein
Mm00514535_m1 DCN decorinExtracellular matrix structural
protein
Mm01256734_m1 FN1 fibronectin 1 Extracellular matrix linker protein
Mm99999915_g1 GAPDH
glyceraldehyde-3-
phosphate
dehydrogenase
Dehydrogenase, endogenous
control
Mm00439498_m1 MMP2matrix metalloproteinase
2Metalloprotease
Mm00489637_m1 SMAD3MAD homolog 3
(Drosophila)
Transcription factor / TGF-beta
superfamily
Mm00484738_m1 SMAD6MAD homolog 6
(Drosophila)
Transcription factor / TGF-beta
superfamily
Mm00443375_m1 CASR calcium sensing receptor G-protein coupled receptor
Mm01741771_g1 BGLAP
bone gamma-
carboxyglutamate
protein (osteocalcin)
Calcium ion binding protein
Mm00492555_m1 BSP bone sialoproteinExtracellular matrix structural
protein
Table
Page 19
Figure 1.
A B
C D
FE
100 m 25 m
100 m
100 m 100 m
40 m
Figure
Page 20
Figure 2.
Changes of cell number in 24h
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
CP25 GYPS PMMA
Fold
incr
ease
of c
ell n
umbe
r **
Changes of cell number in 24h
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
CP25 GYPS PMMA
Fold
incr
ease
of c
ell n
umbe
r **
Page 21
Figure 3.
A.
ALP activity in cultures of 15 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
***
*
ALP
act
ivity
incu
lture
med
ium
(U/g
pro
tein
)
ALP activity in cultures of 15 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
***
*
ALP activity in cultures of 15 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
***
*
ALP
act
ivity
incu
lture
med
ium
(U/g
pro
tein
)
B.
0
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
0,005
0,006
0,007
0,008
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
* ***
SMAD3 expression in cultures of 15 days
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
no
fge
ne
toam
oun
tof
GA
PD
H
0
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
0,005
0,006
0,007
0,008
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
* ***
SMAD3 expression in cultures of 15 days
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
no
fge
ne
toam
oun
tof
GA
PD
H
Page 22
Figure 4.
0
0,00003
0,00006
0,00009
0,00012
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA† †
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
BGLAP
0
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
†
Rel
ativ
eex
pre
ssio
nof
gen
e
BSP
0
0,0000015
0,000003
0,0000045
0,000006
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA† †
Rel
ativ
eex
pre
ssio
nof
gen
e
CASR
0
1
2
3
4
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
**
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
eCOL1A1
**
0
0,06
0,12
0,18
0,24
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
***
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
COL2A1
**
0
1,7
3,4
5,1
6,8
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
** **
Rel
ativ
eex
pres
sion
ofg
ene
FN1
*
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
*
*
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
DCN**
0
0,0025
0,005
0,0075
0,01
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
*
BMP4
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
*
0
0,0025
0,005
0,0075
0,01
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
** **
*
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
SMAD6**
0
0,00003
0,00006
0,00009
0,00012
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA† †
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
BGLAP
0
0,00003
0,00006
0,00009
0,00012
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA† †
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
BGLAP
0
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
†
Rel
ativ
eex
pre
ssio
nof
gen
e
BSP
0
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
****
†
Rel
ativ
eex
pre
ssio
nof
gen
e
BSP
0
0,0000015
0,000003
0,0000045
0,000006
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA† †
Rel
ativ
eex
pre
ssio
nof
gen
e
CASR
0
0,0000015
0,000003
0,0000045
0,000006
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA† †
Rel
ativ
eex
pre
ssio
nof
gen
e
CASR
0
1
2
3
4
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
**
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
eCOL1A1
**
0
1
2
3
4
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
**
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
eCOL1A1
****
0
0,06
0,12
0,18
0,24
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
***
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
COL2A1
**
0
0,06
0,12
0,18
0,24
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
***
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
COL2A1
0
0,06
0,12
0,18
0,24
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
******
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
COL2A1
****
0
1,7
3,4
5,1
6,8
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
** **
Rel
ativ
eex
pres
sion
ofg
ene
FN1
*
0
1,7
3,4
5,1
6,8
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**** ****
Rel
ativ
eex
pres
sion
ofg
ene
FN1
*
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
*
*
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
DCN**
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
*
**
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
DCN**
0
0,0025
0,005
0,0075
0,01
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
*
BMP4
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
*
0
0,0025
0,005
0,0075
0,01
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
**
*
BMP4
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
*
0
0,0025
0,005
0,0075
0,01
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
** **
*
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
SMAD6**
0
0,0025
0,005
0,0075
0,01
CP CP25 GYPS PMMA
** **
*
Rel
ativ
ee
xpre
ssio
nof
gen
e
SMAD6**