Top Banner
EEO Case Update Don Names
28

EEO Case Update

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

Tola

EEO Case Update. Don Names. Transgender Status States Claim under Title VII. Day v. USPS , EEOC Appeal No. 0120122376 (2/19/13) EEOC reiterates its holding in Macy v. DOJ that claim of discrimination on basis of transgender status states a claim of gender discrimination. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: EEO Case Update

EEO Case UpdateDon Names

Page 2: EEO Case Update

Transgender Status States Claim under Title VII

Day v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120122376 (2/19/13)

EEOC reiterates its holding in Macy v. DOJ that claim of discrimination on basis of transgender status states a claim of gender discrimination.

Page 3: EEO Case Update

No HarassmentFeces Happens!

Hillyer v. Interior, EEOC Appeal No. 0120093623 (8/16/12).

Supervisor places feces on employee’s chair.

EEOC finds action “highly inappropriate,” but not due to protected status or prior EEO activity.

Page 4: EEO Case Update

Sex-Based Harassment

Leggett et al v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0720110039 (7/12/12)

Group of women were subjected to harassment on basis of sex by co-worker, resulting in total damages of $428,000.

Page 5: EEO Case Update

Class Complaint PrevailsGarcia v. DOJ (DEA), EEOC Appeal No. 0120122033 (6/7/13)

Class of female Special Agents found to be discriminated against in selection for foreign assignments.

Att’y fees top $1,000,000! Ka-ching!!

Page 6: EEO Case Update

Sanction on Appeal

Tsosie v. Interior (BIA), EEOC Appeal No. 0120081612 (8/31/12)

EEOC sanctions agency for failure to submit ROI on appeal, resulting in finding of hostile work environment on bases of sex and retaliation.

Page 7: EEO Case Update

Reasonable Accommodation DeniedBlocher v. VA, EEOC Appeal No. 0120111937 (1/31/13)

Agency assertion that supervisors may not telework not sufficient to support denial of request for accommodation.

Page 8: EEO Case Update

Agency Fails to Engage in Interactive Process

Underwood v. SSA, EEOC Appeal No. 0720120001 (1/18/13)

Agency fails to engage in interactive process after receiving medical report with diagnosis and request for accommodation.

Page 9: EEO Case Update

Failure to Reassign to Light Duty a Violation

Abeijon v. DHS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120080156 (8/8/12)

Agency denial of reassignment to light duty found unlawful when complainant could not perform essential functions of current job.

Page 10: EEO Case Update

Denial of Reasonable Accommodation

Pitts v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120130039 (3/13/13)

Denial of administrative leave for employee with kidney disease when restrooms were not working found to be unlawful.

Page 11: EEO Case Update

No Duty to Accommodate Employee’s Family Member

Davis v. Interior (BIA), EEOC Appeal No. 0120123517 (2/12/13)

Rehabilitation Act does not require accommodation for spouse of federal employee who was not a federal employee or applicant.

Page 12: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Spence v. NRC, EEOC Appeal No 0120093196 (9/13/12)

Agency award of $100,000 for delay of 2 years in providing reasonable accommodation of telework affirmed by EEOC.

Page 13: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Austin v. VA, EEOC Appeal No. 0120112574 (7/19/12)

EEOC awards $100,000 in damages for extreme emotional distress resulting from denial of reasonable accommodation.

Page 14: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Bennett v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121982 (4/19/13)

EEOC awards $2,500 for technical violation of confidentiality provisions of Rehabilitation Act (medical information improperly released).

Page 15: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Carter v. VA, EEOC Appeal No. 0120122266 (10/18/12)

$500 damages award for per se violation of anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII, taking into account agency actions and harm.

Page 16: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Zehe v. NASA, EEOC Appeal No 0120113282 (3/26/13)

“Outright denial” of telework as a reasonable accommodation deprives agency of “good faith” effort exception to damages award.

Page 17: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Rathore v. DOD (Defense Security Service), EEOC Appeal No. 0120114330 (2/14/13)

Agency’s failure to provide interpreter in 4 of 11 requests did not constitute “good faith” efforts to avoid damages.

Page 18: EEO Case Update

Compensatory Damages

Donahoe v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120185 (3/14/13)

EEOC awards $18,000 in damages for depression following discriminatory removal (Hispanic), but denies compensation for loss of home.

Page 19: EEO Case Update

No Improper Disclosure of Confidential Medical Info.

Debacker v. DOJ, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120307 (1/24/13)

Commission finds agency acted lawfully when EAP counselor notified security that complainant was suicidal and had access to firearm.

Page 20: EEO Case Update

No Improper Disclosure by EEO Investigator

Davis v. Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 0120102597 (6/21/12)

Release of description of disability (recovering alcoholic/addict) to co-worker witnesses during EEO investigation not a violation.

Page 21: EEO Case Update

Medical Files Taken Home Violate Confidentiality

Gray v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121846 (9/10/12)

Postmaster who kept complainant’s medical records in closet at home violated confidentiality provisions of Rehabilitation Act.

Page 22: EEO Case Update

Improper Disability-Related InquiryBozeman v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120923 (5/3/13)

Pre-employment inquiry by selecting official regarding complainant’s medical restrictions violates Rehabilitation Act.

Page 23: EEO Case Update

Improper Disability-Related InquiryUchtman v. USDA, EEOC Appeal No. 0120110532 (2/27/13)

Supervisor’s question as to what type of medication complainant was taking found to be unlawful under Rehabilitation Act.

Page 24: EEO Case Update

Fitness for Duty Exam

Sanders v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120130214 (4/3/13)

No violation of restrictions on disability related medical exams when complainant posed direct threat due to medical condition.

Page 25: EEO Case Update

Race Discrimination Found

Broomfield v. Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 0720110038 (3/26/13)

Police Officer at Denver Mint subjected to disparate treatment and hostile work environment due to his race (African American).

Page 26: EEO Case Update

Race-Based Harassment

Bryant v. Interior (Park Service), EEOC Appeal No. 0120091468 (8/31/12)

EEOC finds complainant subjected to racial harassment and agency was liable due to failure to take prompt and appropriate corrective action.

Page 27: EEO Case Update

Per Se Retaliation

King v. International Boundary and Water Commission, EEOC Appeal No. 0120112384 (3/19/13)

Supervisor informing co-workers of complaint reasonably likely to deter protected activity.

Page 28: EEO Case Update

That’s All Folks!

Questions?