EE Seattle Univ Report

8/3/2019 EE Seattle Univ Report

1/40

2009 acu ty & ta at s act onSurvey Results


2/40

15 Core Surve Dimensions Job Satisfaction/Support provides insight into the satisfaction with

job fit, autonomy and resources

Teaching Environment with a particular focus on faculty, thisdimension consists of statements that address the balance betweenteaching, research and service; the support for advising/mentoringstudents and reco nition for outstandin teachin

Career Development, Research & Scholarship provides insight

into the reported satisfaction with career/professional developmento ortunities and for facult su ort for research and clarit of the

tenure process

Compensation & Benefits captures information about the perceivedfairness of com ensation and the effectiveness of the benefits offered

Facilities & Security provides insight into the reported satisfactionwith physical workspace, overall campus appearance and confidence in


3/40

15 Core Surve Dimensions Policies, Resources & Efficiency assesses the perceived

effectiveness of various s stems olicies and infrastructure

Participation in College Governance captures information aboutthe perception of inclusion and cooperation as related to sharedovernance

Connection to Institution & Pride evaluates the sense of pride and

connection faculty/employees report regarding their affiliation with the

Supervisor/Department Chair Relationship provides insight intothe relationship faculty/employees report with their department chair or

Confidence in Senior Leadership measures the confidence facultyand employees report in the capabilities and credibility of senior

of the institution


4/40

15 Core Surve Dimensions

Faculty, Administration & Staff Relations provides insight into the,

perception of support, cooperation and

Internal Communications assesses the quality of internal,

interactivity

Collaboration measures the perceived cooperation and collegiality

Fairness measures confidence in fair and consistent treatment,especially regarding performance management and issues of

Respect & Appreciation provides insight into the degree to whichfaculty/employees feel respected and valued


5/40

Survey OverviewSurve Instrument

60 core belief statements focusing on workplace quality andmanagerial/organizational competencies

15 additional statements Faculty/Staff rate each statement using a five-point agreement scale

34 Item Benefit Satisfaction component 19 demographic questions

-

Methodology

- , Audit of institution policies, benefits, practices and demographics

Benchmarks

2008 Great Colleges - Best in Category Benchmark 1419 Faculty/Staff; Masters L Carnegie Class, Private, not-for-profit, Far Western States.

Peer Benchmark omp e rom st o peer nst tut ons e ne y eatt e n vers ty s ce o nst tut ona

Research.


6/40

.

other executive officers.

epartment re ers to your most mme ateworkgroup or team.

Supervisor/Department Chair refers to theindividual to whom you directly report.


7/40

Job CategoryRespondents

TotalNumber of

Faculty/StaffResponse Rate

Overall 850 1422 60%

m n s ra on

Faculty 357 716 49%

Professional Staff

Other Staff 215 336 68%


8/40

Guideline Score Description

,

65% - 74% Great

- a r - oo

45% - 54% Yellow Flag

< 45% Red Flag


9/40

Guideline Score Description

-

10% - 14% Fair

-

20% - 29% Red Flag


10/40


11/40

90%

100%

69%70%

80%

59%55% 55%

61%

55%

40%

50%

60%

20%

30%

0%

10%

Supervisor/Department Chair

Confidence inSenior Leadership

Faculty,Administration &

InternalCommunications

Collaboration Fairness Respect &Appreciation


12/40

ega ve

19% 19%18%

20%

14% 14%14%

16%

9%

12%

8%

10%

12%

7%

4%2%

4%

6%

0%Job

Satisfaction/Support

TeachingEnvironment

CareerDevelopment,Research &Scholarship

Compensation& Benefits

Facilities &Security

Policies,Resources &

Efficiency

Participation inCollege

Governance

Connection toInstitution &

Pride


13/40

ega ve

18%

20%

14%

18%

14%

16%

10%

11%12%

11%

10%8%

10%

12%

4%

6%

0%

2%

Supervisor/Department Chair

Relationship

Confidence inSenior Leadership

Faculty,Administration &Staff Relations

InternalCommunications

Collaboration Fairness Respect &Appreciation


14/40

66%men

62%women

0% 50% 100%


15/40

65%

70%

Asian (61)

African American (34)

64%

73%

Caucasian (551)

Two or more races (33)

56%

73%Pacific Islander 6

Hispanic/Latino (21)

58%Other (22)


16/40

42%

63%

My Supervisor/Manager (40)

Career Advancement (228)

55%Pay (129)

71%

78%I would not consider leaving (64)

Retirement (152)

59%Other (157)


17/40

BenefitSeattle

University(Positive %)

BenefitSeattle

University(Positive %)

Medical Insurance 82 Life Insurance 62

Dental Insurance 75

Voluntary Accidental Death &

Dismemberment Insurance 63

Vision Insurance 73 Short-Term Disability Benefits 62

Alternative Treatment Options 53 Long-Term Disability Benefits 61

Long-term Care 50mp oyee ass s ance rograms

(EAP) 52

Prescription Drug Plan 70 Post-retirement Medical Benefits 37


18/40

Job Satisfaction/ Su ortSeattle

Universit

Seattle

Universit

Peer

Benchmark

Bestin

Cate or

urvey a emen(Positive%) (Negative%) (Positive%)

(Medium)

(Positive%)

.

I

am

given

the

responsibility

and

freedom

to

do

my

job.

81 5 85 87

IamprovidedtheresourcesIneedtobeeffectiveinmyjob. 52 17 58 66

o a s ac on uppor : vera verage


19/40

Teachin Environment

Seattle Seattle Peer Bestin

SurveyStatement University(Positive%)

University

(Negative%)Benchmark

(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

, ,

thisinstitution.59 16 67 69

There

is

appropriate

recognition

of

innovative

and

high

ualit teachin .59 12 66 75

TeachingEnvironment:OverallAverage 59 14 66 72


20/40

Career Development, Research &Scholarship

SurveyStatement SeattleUniversity(Positive%)

Seattle

University

(Negative%)

Peer

Benchmark

(Positive%)

Best

in

Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Iamgiventheopportunitytodevelopmyskillsatthis

institution.62 11 75 78

I understandthenecessaryrequirementstoadvancemy

career.58 17 73 75

CareerDevelopment,Research&Scholarship:Overall60 14 74 76

Average


21/40

Com ensation & Benefits

SurveyStatementSeattle

University

(Positive%)

Seattle

University

(Negative%)

Peer

Benchmark

(Positive%)

Bestin

Category(Medium)

(Positive%)

Iampaidfairlyformywork. 40 30 51 57

Thisinstitutionsbenefitsmeetmyneeds. 71 9 68 78

Compensation&Benefits:OverallAverage 55 19 59 67


22/40

Facilities & Securit



University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Theoverallappearanceofthecampusispleasing. 91 1 62 93

The

institution

takes

reasonable

steps

to

provide

a

safe

and

secure environment for the cam us.88 2 90 92

Thefacilities(e.g.classrooms,offices,laboratories)

adequatelymeetmyneeds.48 20 88 77

Facilities&

Security:

Overall

Average 75 7 80 87


23/40

Policies Resources & Efficienc



University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Ourreviewprocessaccuratelymeasuresmyjobperformance. 53 21 57 60

Ourorientationprogrampreparesnewfaculty,

administration and staff to be effective.55 15 43 64

Ourrecognitionandawardsprogramsaremeaningfultome. 40 26 57 50

y z v u

promotionprocess.

66 12 73 75

Thisinstitutionactivelycontributestothecommunity 86 2 86 90


24/40

Policies, Resources & Efficiencypage 2

SurveyStatement SeattleUniversity SeattleUniversity PeerBenchmark BestinCategory(Medium)

Thisinstitutionplacessufficientemphasisonhavingdiverse

faculty,administration

and

staff.

80 4 65 76

Thisinstitutioniswellrun. 58 10 61 69

o c es, esources c ency: vera verage


25/40

Participation in College

overnanceSeattle Seattle Peer Bestin


University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

publicized.39 26 61 70

Facultyareappropriately involvedindecisionsrelatedtoteh

educationprogram(e.g.curriculumdevelopment, 58 12 72 77

evaluation).

Faculty,administrationandstaffaremeaningfully involvedin

institutionalplanning.43 19 54 67

ParticipationinCollegeGovernance:OverallAverage 46 19 62 71


26/40

Connection to Institution & PrideSurveyStatement SeattleUniversity SeattleUniversity PeerBenchmark BestinCategory(Medium)

(Positive%) (Negative%) (Positive%) (Positive%)

Iunderstandhowmyjobcontributestothis institutions

mission.88 2 89 92

Iamproudtobepartofthisinstitution. 82 2 80 88

Ifeelastrongsenseofloyaltytothisinstitution. 73 7 74 79

Thisinstitutionsculture isspecial somethingyoudontfind

justanywhere.71 8 65 74

Allthingsconsidered,thisisa greatplacetowork. 73 5 75 82

ConnectiontoInstitution&Pride:Overall Average 77 4 76 83


27/40

Supervisor/ Department Chair

e a ons pSeattle Seattle Peer Bestin


University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

clear.67 10 70 76

Ireceivefeedbackfrommysupervisor/departmentchair

that hel s me. 60 14 64 70

IbelievewhatIamtoldbymysupervisor/departmentchair. 72 7 77 79

y u v u y

institutionsvalues.

69 10 73 77

Mysupervisor/departmentchairisconsistentand fair. 70 12 73 77


28/40

Supervisor/ Department Chair

Relationship (page 2)


Seattle

University

(Negative%)

Peer

Benchmark

(Positive%)

Bestin

Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Mysupervisor/departmentchairactivelysolicitsmy

suggestionsandideas.67 14 72 76

Ihaveagoodrelationshipwithmysupervisor/department

chair.81 6 83 85

Supervisor/DepartmentChairRelationship:OverallAverage 69 10 73 77


29/40

Confidence in Senior LeadershiSeattle Seattle Peer Bestin


University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

institutionsfuture.53 15 57 69

Ourseniorleadershiphastheknowledge, skillsand

ex erience necessar for institutional success. 66 8 67 77

Seniorleadershipshowsagenuineinterestinthewellbeing

offaculty,administrationandstaff.60 15 61 69

u y u

matters.

54 14 51 64

Itrustseniorleadershipenoughtofollowthem,evenwhen I

disa ree with their decisions.61 12 68 71


30/40

Confidence in Senior Leadershippage

SurveyStatement SeattleUniversity SeattleUniversity PeerBenchmark BestinCategory(Medium)(Positive%) (Negative%) (Positive%) (Positive%)

Seniorleadershipregularlymodelsthisinstitutionsvalues. 66 9 64 77

IbelievewhatIamtoldbyseniorleadership. 56 10 60 70

ConfidenceinSeniorLeadership:OverallAverage 59 11 61 71


31/40

Faculty, Administration & Staff

e a onsSeattle Seattle Peer Bestin


University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)


Faculty,administrationandstaffworktogethertoensurethe

success of institution ro rams and initiatives. 63 6 67 75

Thereisregularandopencommunicationamongfaculty,

administrationandstaff.42 17 53 62

Faculty,

Administration

&

Staff

Relations:

Overall

average 55 12 60 68


32/40

Internal CommunicationsSeattle Seattle Peer Bestin


University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

.

clear.67 10 70 75

Ireceivefeedbackfrom mysupervisor/departmentchair

that hel s me. 60 14 64 68

WhenIofferanewidea,Ibelieveitwillbefullyconsidered. 57 14 66 67

u w y

somethingwithout

fear

of

harming

my

career.

61 17 66 68

Inmydepartment, wecommunicateopenlyaboutissuesthat

im act each others work.57 15 65 71


33/40

Internal Communications a e 2

Seattle SeattlePeer

Bestin


University

(Negative%) (Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

implemented.43 21 53 57

Seniorleadershipprovidesacleardirectionforthis

institutions future. 53 15 57 67

Seniorleadershipcommunicatesopenlyaboutimportant

matters.54 14 54 60

u ,w u u u y

toget

better

results.

51 11 51 61

InternalCommunications:OverallAverage 55 14 60 66


34/40

Collaboration


Seattle

University

(Negative%)

Peer

Benchmark

(Positive%)

Bestin

Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Wehaveopportunitiestocontributetoimportantdecisions

inmy

department.

64 14 71 75

Peopleinmydepartmentworkwelltogether. 65 9 72 74

Overall,my

department

is

agood

place

to

work.

77 6 81 84

Icancountonpeopletocooperateacrossdepartments. 48 12 58 61

institution.

50 17 53 61

Collaboration:OverallAverage 61 11 67 71


35/40

Fairness


Ican

speak

up

or

challenge

atraditional

way

of

doing

somethingwithoutfearofharmingmycareer.61 17 66 67

Promotionsinmydepartmentarebasedonapersonsability. 49 24 47 66

u w y .

Mysupervisor/ departmentchairisconsistentandfair. 70 12 64 77

Thisinstitutions

policies

and

practices

ensure

fair

treatment

forfaculty,administration andstaff.54 13 64 66

: v v


36/40

Respect & Appreciation


Iamregularlyrecognizedformycontributions. 54 19 57 60

SeniorLeadershipshowsagenuineinterestinthewellbeing


Atthis

institution,

people

are

supportive

of

their

colleagues

regardlessoftheirheritageorbackground.

Wecelebratesignificantmilestonesandimportant

accomplishmentsatthisinstitution.69 5 78 84

Thisinstitutions

policies

and

practices

five

me

the

flexibility

tomanagemypersonalandfamilylife.68 11 77 82

: v v


37/40

Additional Statements


Seattle

University

(Negative%)

Peer

Benchmark

(Positive%)

Bestin

Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Thisinstitutions

mission,

vision

and

values

guide

decision

makingintheuniversity.70 5 * *

Thisinstitutionsupportsthespiritualdevelopmentofits

faculty&staff.79 3 * *

Iam

encouraged to

maintain

ahealthy

balance

between

my

51 18 * *personallifeandprofessionallife.

Ihaveadequatetimeforscholarlypursuits. 35 37 * *

Therequirements

for

faculty

tenure

are

clear

to

me.

55 23 * *

Iamencouragedtoparticipateincommunityservice71 9 * *

activities.


38/40

Additional Statements (page 2)


Seattle

University

(Negative%)

Peer

Benchmark

((Positive%)

Bestin

Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Thisinstitutionfullysupports facultyeffortsdevotedto

advising/mentoring

students.

62 11 * *

Thereisafeelingofcollegialityinmydepartment. 66 12 * *

Mysupervisor/ departmentchairsupportsmyeffortsto

balancemy

work

and

personal

life.

70 10 * *

Myworkenvironmentisfairforeveryone. 57 17 * *

seniorleadership.

51 16 * *

Thisinstitutionsseniorleadershiprespectsthefaculty. 72 9 * *


39/40



University


(Positive%)Category

(Medium)

(Positive%)

Seniorleadershipkeepstheirpromises. 57 10 * *

IvaluetheJesuitCatholicdimensionofSeattleUniversitys

mission,vision

and

values.

86 2 * *

Iwouldrecommendworkingheretomyfamilyandfriends. 77 4 * *

Additional Statements:OverallAverage 63 12 * *


40/40

Overall Avera e

SurveyStatement SeattleUniversity SeattleUniversity PeerBenchmark BestinCategory(Medium)(Positive%) (Negative%) (Positive%) (Positive%)

AllCoreStatementsAverage: 62 12 66 72

EE Seattle Univ Report

Documents