KLAIPĖDA UNIVERSITY STUDY MODULE PROGRAMME (SMP) Study module code (module) S 280 M 007 Accredited until 2014 09 01 Last updated Branch of science Progr. Reg. No. Course title Educational management (Coaching) Prerequisites Heterogeneity Management, Introduction to Andragogy Expected outcomes of the study module No. Learning outcomes Study methods Methods of student’s learning achievement evaluation 1 Will be able to understand the main principles and functions of educational management (coaching); to identify the main categories of educational management Debate, discussion, literature analysis, practical tasks, exercises, reflection of activity Reporting for practice work, presentation 2 Will be able to apply the techniques of educational management (coaching) in the field of adult education by creating favourable learning environment. Information search tasks, Simulation of real-life situations Reporting for practice work, Test 3 Will know peculiarities, methodology of categories of educational management (coaching) and will be able to apply some coaching techniques when solving various learning problems of the adult learners. Case analysis (case study), discussion, literature analysis, exercises Reporting for practice work, Test 4 Will be able to make innovative decisions when supporting the adult learners. Debate, exercises Case analysis, Reporting for practice work The main objective of the study module To develop abilities of the future andragogists by providing support for the adult learning persons who seek high-scoring learning, by supporting a learning person by developing his/her available internal powers and by creating a favourable learning environment.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
KLAIPĖDA UNIVERSITY
STUDY MODULE PROGRAMME (SMP)
Study module code
(module)
S 280 M 007 Accredited
until 2014 09 01
Last
updated Branch of
science Progr.
Reg.
No.
Course title
Educational management (Coaching)
Prerequisites
Heterogeneity Management, Introduction to Andragogy
Expected outcomes of the study module
No. Learning outcomes Study methods
Methods of
student’s learning achievement
evaluation
1
Will be able to understand the main principles and
functions of educational management (coaching); to identify the main categories of educational
management
Debate, discussion,
literature analysis, practical tasks, exercises,
reflection of activity
Reporting for
practice work,
presentation
2
Will be able to apply the techniques of educational
management (coaching) in the field of adult education by creating favourable learning
environment.
Information search tasks,
Simulation of real-life
situations
Reporting for practice work, Test
3
Will know peculiarities, methodology of
categories of educational management (coaching) and will be able to apply some coaching
techniques when solving various learning
problems of the adult learners.
Case analysis (case
study), discussion,
literature analysis, exercises
Reporting for
practice work, Test
4 Will be able to make innovative decisions when
supporting the adult learners. Debate, exercises
Case analysis, Reporting for
practice work
The main objective of the study module
To develop abilities of the future andragogists by providing support for the adult learning persons who seek
high-scoring learning, by supporting a learning person by developing his/her available internal powers and
by creating a favourable learning environment.
Summary
The study module consists of the following three parts: conception, areas, categories functions, theoretical aspects of the phenomenon of the educational management (coaching) are revealed in the first part. The
second part is intended for the analysis of possibilities of the andragogist who provides coaching services
and for various measures, methods, techniques and their application in the field of the adult education. The third part is intended for analysis of activity peculiarities of coach.
The purpose of the study module
Level of university studies Subject group (under the regulation of the study area) Subject level
Cycle Type
Second Master Special courses related to the field of study Going deep into
Study area or field according to the method of study funding
4. Architecture, education and training, study fields of physical sciences’ study area (except mathematics),
study fields of biomedical sciences’ study area (except sports, rehabilitation, nursing, medicine, veterinary medicine and odontology), study fields of technology sciences’ study area (except education of pilots),
trade, craft]: activity skills, ways, methods of coach, knowing how to use these methods (Pousa et
al., 2010).
Coaching role is to develop, expand, human potential that can be developed only by equally
distributing attention to all elements of the client who participates in coaching (physical, mental,
emotional).
Metidicity - in Greek language (Μĕτις / Mễtis) means caution and wisdom – metidicity. This
term is related with Metis - daughter of god Oceanus and Tethys. Metis was the first spouse of
Zeus. She persuaded Zeus into giving a potion to cause Kronos to vomit out Zeus' siblings. Metis
foisted on Kronos the drink by herself, and ordered to Titan to return children. As Metis wanted to
avoid close relationships with Zeus she often used to change her appearance, but Zeus got lucky and
impregnated her. Gaia (goddess of Earth) had predicted that she would bear a girl, but the next child
who would be born out of the relationships with Metis, would be a boy, who would remove Zeus
from the Olympus, just like Zeus removed his father Kronos. Zeus got scared and swallowed the
pregnant Metis - goddess of wisdom and Caution. That day when the baby was supposed to be born
Zeus had a headache. He asked Hephaestus to cleave his skull. The beautiful Pallas Athena leaped
from Zeus's head, and she inherited the wisdom from her mother. Even Metis had been swallowed
though she used to give wise advices to Zeus. In iconography sometimes Metis is represented as a
small creature hiding behind Zeus’s throne. It is often stated that Zeus swallowed Metis not only
because he was afraid to lose his power, but also because he wanted to pocket her wisdom, since
Metis was goddess of wisdom who knew more than all the gods and the mortality. Image of Metis
is ternary. On the one part, she is goddess of wisdom, on the other part, she is goddess of caution,
and basically she leaves an image of artfulness. Psychologists have borrowed from Metis an idea of
adaptation. Adaptation is treated as ability to adjust to the environment. A living creature is gifted
by nature with certain plasticity that allows adapting to the environmental changes, and herewith to
maintain spiritual balance.
Metidicity has become as a general term meaning the art to adjust a delicate situation
for one’s benefit. With future Metis is related hypothetically as a possibility conditioned by
coincidence. Her predictions are problematic, they only reveal, but do not indicate how to sneak out
of danger. Metis interferes in person’s life only when the heavenly world is still bubbling over,
boiling or when balance of forces of the heavenly world is disturbed at least for a short time. She
shows courage and power, and herewith a reasonable initiative, craftiness and wisdom.
Thought is power, energy however at the same time a subtle substance that acts in a
very remote area from physical world (Aivanhov, 1997).
Learning problem – [obstacle, difficulty, task] – 1. an objective question that occurred
in the cognitive process, of which decision has basic meaning for cognitive advancement; 2. an
objection that originated from consciousness that must be settled by the individual. Problems are
educational, scientific, practical, artistic, domestic, personal, etc. (Jovaiša, 2007, p. 233). Task of
learning as an objective new requirement in the consciousness of the learner becomes as a problem,
that sometimes may be solved easily, and sometimes more efforts are required. Personal problem is
considered to be an internal difficulty that may not be settled on one’s own efforts that is limiting
normal living, that encourages seeking for help (Jovaiša, 2007, p. 233). Difficulty is a state of
personality that prevents from adaptive and adequate behaviour and work, which is experienced as a
tiresome, troublesome, burden. Difficulties originate from innate weak ability to adapt of an
individual or from unfavourable environmental conditions. Pedagogists, andragogists, psychologists
help to overcome difficulties according to their competence, by considering the extent of the
difficulty. Difficulty becomes as a personal problem when there is a wish to get rid of it and to ease
internal state (Jovaiša, 2007, p. 279). Therefore it is possible to state that difficulty is not identical
to the learning problem that mostly depends on external factors and is quite of temporary nature.
Difficulty mostly depends on internal factors and requires bigger efforts in order to remove it.
Types of learning problems: problems of cognitive, psychomotoric, psychosocial,
affective - motivational nature (Jovaiša, 2007).
Sub consciousness is thinking of image character up to verbal thinking intended for
initiation, distribution and gestation of ideas supplemented by function of evaluation of emotional
type. Sub consciousness depending on the field of science may also be treated as initiative thinking
or simply as intuition. Human internal world - is thoughts suggested by consciousness in the sub
consciousness (made according to J. B. Watson (1913), I. Pavlov (1927), S. Freud (1960), M.
Polany (1967), C. Jung (1971), O. M. Aivanhov (1997), H. Simonas (2001), D. M. Wegner (2002),
R. Wilson (2002), B. Libet (1985, 2004), A. Meneghetti (2003, 2004), G. R. Henden (2004), R.
Winston (2005) et al.).
Potential: 1. scalar or vectorial function of space and time that defines vectorial field,
e.g. electricity, gravitation, velocity, force; 2. level of capacity, power, e.g. martial potential of some
country (Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, 2009). Human potential is individual’s current physical,
mental, emotional sources. Potential is not the same as personality since human potential first of all
is characterized by biological and not by psychological nature (Paul, 2004).
Rationality is a method by which mind takes measures. Rationality is not the mind, but
the technique, set of rules, which is based on evident factors and does not reject evidence itself
(Менегетти, 2002).
Reflection is the acquired ability of consciousness to concentrate and to understand
oneself as an object having his/her specific stability and specific meaning - able not just to cognize;
not just to know, but to know what one knows (Шарден, 1987).
NLP – neurolinguistic programming.
TA – transactional analysis.
All people deep inside have a big potential, many talents. Unfortunately, not everybody knows it. Probably it is a bigger joy to help other people to discover their spiritual riches and to help them to bring those hidden
riches into the day light than to discover those talents in yourself.
Foreword
More and more often it is possible to hear not only business organizations, managers
and employees speaking about coaching or coaching culture. University, school and adult education
are interested in it. This study book is intended for students of Andragogics master studies which go
deep into the study module of Educational management. However this book may be also useful for
students of other study modules and lecturers, andragogists practitioners.
Coaching originated from the juncture of three separate social areas - psychotherapy,
training and management, however it is important to notice that these sciences try to achieve quite
different goals and the goal of coaching, methods, techniques were created in their synthesis
(Malinauskas, 2009). Goal of psychotherapy is to remove client’s discomfort; goal of training is to
help for the sportsman who goes into training to actualize maximum possibilit ies when trying to
achieve for good results; goal of management is identification of goals and measures for achieving
goals of organization.
In the adult education in certain cases discomfort of learners also exists (learning
problems of cognitive, affective nature, unfulfilled professional, career expectations, difficult search
for personal, professional identity, problems of relationships with other persons, et al.), when adult
learners also have to mobilize all of their potentials when trying to achieve the best or good
learning results, and andragogists being next to the adult learners, may help when achieving them
(Agarwal et al., 2009). Thus coaching may be not only applied but it also should be applied in the
activity of every andragogist, in every institution of adult education.
There are many discussions about the way in which coaching helps when achieving
goals, to be more creative and more flexible, to free the potential and to find new spaces. However
in Lithuania coaching is quite widely used only as an instrument of management consequently it is
not that different from standard management. In order to increase efficiency of organization
heads/managers should have coaching instruments when applying them it would be possible to
improve process of communication both inside and outside the organization (Grant, Spence, 2010).
If there is a wish to develop abilities of application of coaching instruments, there are many courses
organized where students are introduced with coaching theory and methods, technique, these
students have possibility to acquire practical abilities of coaching area. However coaching and adult
education, application of coaching in the meaning of andragogist’s activity, by helping to solve
problems of various natures of the learning adults in Lithuania it is practically not analyzed area.
Meanwhile in foreign countries coaching has crossed the limits of sports, psychotherapy or
management. During the last twenty years hundreds of books about coaching have been published
in foreign countries, thousands of websites have been created in the internet and thousands of
people have started to practice this profession, not only thousands of managers, businessmen have
started to use coaching services, but also thousands of adult learners, andragogists, students,
lecturers, teachers, parents (Grant et al., 2009). Andragogists try to understand how knowledge,
abilities and skills of coaching area may e useful to each of them, especially in these times of rapid
changes, information, knowledge increase.
Currently in the available resources more than thousand published studies and
researches are calculated. Specialists of social sciences encourage to go deep into knowledge of this
area and to analyze principles of coaching activity. The first scientific publications on this subject
have appeared in Lithuania (Čibonis, 2007; Jatkauskienė et al., 2008; Mažutytė, 2009; Samulionytė,
Juknaitė, 2009; Židonienė, 2009 et al.). However little attention is given to the actions which occur
during the coaching process and how this process helps people. It should be useful to repeat once
again that in Lithuania there is no much research intended for application of coaching techniques in
the adult education and herewith in the activity of andragogist. Another important and unexplored
subject is to answer the question if coaching could provide and if it provides coaching services a
professional andragogist, though he/she does not have coaching certificate. This fact has supposed
the idea of educational management subject.
Coaching, as a phenomenon of social reality, first of all is based on humanism, i.e.
support for person who tries to solve personal or professional problem of activity (Richez, 2006).
Specific role of coaching is to develop, educate human potential that may be developed only by
equally giving attention to all elements of client who participates in coaching (physical, mental,
emotional). Human potential (current physical, mental, emotional sources) is not the same as
personality, since human potential firstly is characterized by biological and not by psychological
nature (Paul, 2004).
Book structure. The book consists of three parts according to the anticipated subjects
of the study module. A list of notions and abbreviations is introduced in the beginning. Each topic
has its own main question into which students are encouraged to answer at the end of the topic.
Many questions are presented in the topic for the group discussion. After each topic questions are
indicated which are intended for self-control. Tasks of independent work with descriptions of
performance of the task are presented in the appendix 1; Mid-test and its answers and final test and
its answers are presented in appendix 2; Strategy intended for group discussions in the appendix 3 is
used to help the students to facilitate becoming a master of art of discussion and to finally learn to
discuss; Exercises with instructions are presented in appendix 4; a real example of coaching session
is provided in appendix 5 according to which it is going to be easier to participate in coaching
exercises; allegoric stories intended for illustration of coaching use and problems solution, for better
understanding of coaching phenomenon are presented in appendix 6. At the end of the book you
will find list of literature and appendixes.
Crosswords and a puzzle intended for independent tasks are prepared by students of
Andragogics master studies of 1st course (2012) of KU TSI: Ieva, Žilinskienė, Darius Sidabras,
Jonas Liorancas. In opinion of these students and the author of the book when solving crosswords it
is easier to remember notions of coaching.
The allegoric stories have been collected and have been sent by Master of Andragogics
studies, Natalija Bagdonienė. These stories will help student’s to better substantiate, illustrate
coaching phenomenon and measures of activity of the andragogist who provides coaching services.
I am thankful for my students for their help when preparing this study book and
especially for suggestions, evaluations and expertise to which a corresponding attention was paid.
The author wishes you enjoyable reading and meaningful activity
It is suggested that coaching is not therapy, but some authors (Longin, 2006, Richez,
2006) note that coaching is used in the psychotherapy. However psychoanalyst, psychologist or
psychiatrist during sessions will always present to the client some recommendations (to read, to get
acquainted, to go in for sports, etc.), when pursuing therapeutically goals. Meanwhile a coach does
not do this. Coach and client concentrates on the current situation and focuses the prospective,
desired by the client, but not anticipated by the coach, situation.
Coaching is different from mentorship because a mentor, as an expert of his field, helps
and teaches a person who does not have professional experience, shares his experience, ideas,
knowledge with the latter. Consequently as they interact, a mentor is a dominating person, as if a
model of representative of the profession. Meanwhile activity of the coach is neither dominating,
nor preponderant. Nature of mentorship is even more different. It is suggested that mentorship is an
integral part of coaching seeking to reflect revelation and development of the meaning (work,
particular situation, professional life, etc.) (Guyon 2005). In such case a coach must figure out well
external factors of organization (market, fashion, social, technological, political changes, etc.).
Mentorship, when performing function of stabilizer, seeks for balance among
professional values, personal identity and the being performed activity. A mentor is a person who
has personal and professional experience that allows giving to the tutored colleague the certain
toeholds, and it requires from every mentor much true to life wisdom, experience, since to the
tutored person values and experience of all generations is conveyed. Mentorship preserves the
requirements of educational interaction - student/teacher, fulfils the peacemaker’s function and
especially in a chaotic situation. Discussion:
In opinion of some coaches (Turner et al., 2007; Amar, Angel, 2006; Lenhardt, Buratti, 2007 et al.), mentorship is a
part of integral coaching.
What could you say to these authors?
Coaching expands its practical activity by encompassing various areas. In the USA
another tendency occurs; in this country the mentioned above coaching forms are considered to be
as three separate coaching approaches. This tendency is also certified by the fact that in these latter
years many publications intended for educational management, technical coaching and mentorship,
have been published. It means that it is possible to expect that professions of all mentioned
activities will appear since currently practitioners of coaching often specialize according to its
separate forms and categories.
The coach and the client are equivalent persons. Discussion:
Why a coach is compared with a companion?
“M. Paula (2004) equates coaching specialist to a companion. A verb accompany (French - accompagner) means to
choose a companion. To accompany means to join someone else and to go in the same direction and time with another
person. We are going together, the companion does not have a priority right, he just accompanies.”
Accompaniment means direction, pursuit of aim, transition from one condition to
another. Consequently coaching dimensions are as follow (Richez, 2006): domination of the client,
priority rights; being together, interrelations; pursuing the goal together; transition from one
situation (state) to another; transience in time and space.
Thus, from the social approach coaching is an object of individuals’ agreement, limited
in time and intended for solving of a complicated social situation, for pursuing commonly set goals.
A proficient of coaching is not a magician who indicates what has to be done. Such
specialist applies methodologies, techniques which normally are based on questions on perspective,
decisions, are oriented towards the goal. It is proven that human thinking works in the form of
questions-answers. Therefore after conscious repeating of specialists’ questions we find the most
suitable answer by ourselves (Turner, 2006). Coach is only a tool helping person to work with
himself and to find decisions.
Differences between coaching and other areas are summarized and provided in Table 1: Table 1. Differences between coaching and other areas
Area Main differences
Psychotherapy Principle of psychotherapy - mostly work with the past and the cause is done, and coaching
is oriented towards the future.
Counselling The basis of counselling is advices. During the coaching session advices are not given,
personal opinion is not pressed on the client. This technique helps to person to discover his
goals, mostly related with values, by himself and to find the most suitable way towards
them. Coaching is a fight with advices. Since advices is an intervention into the course of
thinking of another person. Every person is unique and extraneous advice only limits that uniqueness.
Teaching Teaching provides knowledge for creation of effective model of life. Coaching is not based
neither on conveyance of knowledge, nor on conveyance of abilities. Vice versa: it
encourages using experience and the already accumulated knowledge. Essence of coaching
is to help to person to discover in himself and in others the sources required for activity:
knowledge, knowing, attitudes and abilities.
Mentorship In case of successful mentorship the client becomes similar to the mentor. According to
coaching principles, everyone by using his talents, available potential, creates his own way
of life, image, identity, and is capable of finding decisions which are the best for him.
Mentorship is a process, when successful specialist of the certain area (pedagogies or
andragogists) shares their experience and teaches to follow their example. It is expected
during the coaching for a person to find the most suitable way to success by himself.
Friendship Friendship is oriented towards intercommunion, support, meanwhile coaching is oriented
towards self-knowledge, problem solving, mobilisation and use of one’s own potential and not of friends.
Tutorship
Tutor means direction, pursuit of goal, transition from one professional condition to
another. In such case tutor is leader in the full sense of the word and client when following
the leader does not have a priority right. Meanwhile coaching means client’s and not tutor’s
(leader’s) domination, priority right. Coach does not share with the client experience,
knowledge, abilities, but is able to figure out client’s experience, knowledge, abilities, but
is able to figure out and to observe client to evaluate situation and obstacles which limit
client’s activity. At best tutorship or mentorship is only one of coaching categories.
Educational management
Educational management “borrows” the philosophy of coaching but does not pay attention
to the important aspect of coaching - dimension of exteriorization that makes up the added
value of coaching. One of coaching’s advantages is difference that is seen between
responsibility of capacity and responsibility of improvement. Undoubtedly in this case there
should be an issue of ethics addressed. Is it ethical when having management education to run courses of educational management? Where is their added value? Is there any
difference with regard to perspective of such courses or sessions?
The so called educational management - search for new method of management of which
goal is to build upon the current abilities of colleagues. However this search will not change
the necessity of the third person - external coach, who is able and capable to anticipate the
dimension of system of the connection - manager - subordinates. And this happens do to a
very simple reason: both and the manager and the subordinates would be involved into the
same activity too closely, consequently it is difficult to look in yourself with another (e.g.
external coach) eyes. In other words manager and subordinates ca not at the same time and
play basketball and look when basketball is played. Educational management, on the basis
of abilities of colleagues cannot serve coaching functions and especially function of his
mirror effect.
It is clear that coaching is a new form of help, intervention, and Lithuanian equivalent
may be provided by coaching professionals but it is stated that for the meantime any equivalent has
not settled, communities of linguists, scientists and coaches have not yet agreed on the term that
will be acceptable for all parties.
Coaching areas and categories. Variety of conceptions is reflected in coaching
practice. Coaching practice is extremely diverse, complex coaching is applied in areas of personal
improvement, situation analysis, evaluation of changes, systemic alteration and in other areas.
Maybe that is the reason why there is no general definition of coaching (and maybe it can not be
present?). It is a comparatively new activity rapidly developing not only in business organization,
among single persons, in educational institutions, etc., consequently is it difficult to describe it by
already known terms of previous activities, professions.
Areas of coaching application are various: behavioural improvement, career
projection, improvement of practical activity, development of personal internal powers, support
during strategic changes, etc. They may be divided into more detailed elements (Lenhardt et al.,
2007): career management and self-management - is the help to purify goals of career and to draw a
plan of actions; education of personal effectiveness; management of flow of knowledge and
information; self-education, adult education; time management; development of goals, where
coaching helps to find suitable ways towards the goal; development of interpersonal relationship’
business development where coaching helps to orient in labyrinths of this area and to purify the
necessary strategies; education of life balance is a unique area. It is useful when pursuing harmony
in various areas of life. Currently it is very popular. It is not difficult to explain. When a person puts
all of his efforts in order to achieve the set goals in one area, other ones often are neglected. For
example, person who gave all of his attention to financial well-being, few years later comes to his
senses and understands that he does not have friends, family, leisure time anymore. Coaching of life
balance helps to puzzle out what areas have been damaged the most and to find ways for alteration
of the situation.
Everyone who wants to improve results of his personal, professional activity when
working with coach may achieve more than he used to have, however these achievements of every
person will be different. Coaching will not help to each person alike. Even the clients of the same
coach will achieve different results and any specialist of this field will not be able to increase them
more than the person himself wants it.
Coach simply helps to purify that potential which resides inside us and to raise it above
our understanding. Namely that is achieved with coach’s help who in his activity builds on the
following main principles of coaching:
each person has unlimited potential;
each person believes that he is capable to do more;
each person deep inside him knows ways how to achieve more. Only it is necessary
by asking special questions to help him to find these ways.
According to the already mentioned areas of coaching (behavioural improvement, career
projecting, improvement of practical activity, development of personal internal powers, support
during the period of strategic changes, etc.) coaching categories are divided into – individual and
team (corporate) coaching (Devillard, 2001)4 and their various forms. Other authors (Lainé, 2005
5,
4 Devillard O. (2001). Coacher. Efficacité personnelle et performance collective. Paris: Dunod.
Turner, Hévin 20076) also single out the organizations’ coaching (strategic coaching). It should be
mentioned that the number of areas increases.
It is considered that coaching areas are divided not only for the clients’ sake, and
convenience, but also for the benefit of the coaches. Although, on the other hand, the abundance of
areas allows choosing for the client the particular coaching that corresponds client’s problem, but it
is necessary to make sure if the selected coach is capable of comprehending the problem.
Team coaching emphasizes both technical and humane cohesion in respect of goals of
the organization and activity of members of the team. Individual coaching is intended for decisions
making and for the development of personal improvement, identification of individual internal
obstacles and their control is emphasized. In case of behavioural improvement the best way of
pursuit of the set ambitious goal is being searched for. Although in both cases there is a goal to
reveal conditions for the success, however from another mentioned forms coaching is different by
its perspective since identification of obstacles and their control are not identical to the way of
achievement of the goal (Whitmore, 1998)7.
Coaching of different categories and forms is based on different methodologies.
Coaching of decisions making is applied in case of often or constant professional problems of
employees: unsatisfactory effectiveness of activities of employees, lack of communication with
others or unsatisfactory quality, poor management of stress or time, conflicts, not preparation to
hold another duties or to take another work place, etc. In this case method of psychology,
transactional analysis (TA), neurolinguistic programming (NLP), systematic analysis (SA) are
applied.
Such coaching is divided into several stages: diagnostics, development of perception
field, decision making and implementation. The coaching of decisions making is completed by the
solution of the behavioural problem or the complicated situation.
Coaching of education of personal (improvement) development (personal
effectiveness) more emphasizes the anticipated, desired situation than the acting person. Common
activity of the coach and the client is based on this form of coaching. Coaching of education of
improvement is pursuing to optimize conditions for success with the help of analysis of the
situation. The factors influencing the situation, possible obstructions, advantages and disadvantages
of the situation are analysed. The stages of such coaching are as follows: detailed plan of
preparation, implementation of the plan, determination of conditions for success, anticipation and
evaluation of obstacles and disturbances. Coaching of education of improvement is applied when
the client needs to prepare for important events (meeting, presentation of report, negotiations,
conference, appointment, presentation of strategy, etc.). This coaching’s form is closely related to
client’s style of management and efficiency, consequently the coach must possess diagnostic
abilities and knowledge of social psychology, communication, negotiations, systems analysis.
.
When summarizing it is possible to state that coaching conception is portmanteau,
since the phenomenon itself is analyzed and practiced in the crossing of various social sciences and
activity fields. Coaching is neither a measure, nor a technique, but only a specific personal or
professional situation (state). By using its technologies there is a goal to connect coaching’s
theoretical basis with practice. Coaching is beyond comparison more effective than that of advices,
lessons, persuasion or exchange in opinions. People who live and manage in coaching style believe
that each person has his unlimited potential; each person wants to be more successful as he is now;
5 Lainé S. (2005). Management de la Différence, Apprivoiser l‘interculturelle. Paris: Afnor. 6 Turner J., Hévin B. (2007). Manuel de coaching. Paris: InterEditions. 7 Whitmore J. (1998). Le Guide du coaching. Paris: Maxima.
each person knows how to become more successful - only it is necessary to help him/her to reveal
it; each interference (advice) impedes person to realize his potential. Consequently it is possible to
state that coaching is a world outlook and life style. However coaching encompasses not only the
above mentioned principles, but also various techniques which help persons to understand goals of
professional activity and personal life, to draw up an effective plan of actions, to achieve them, to
purify and to understand values of himself and other people.
Basically coaching everywhere and always is the same, is based on the same principles, simply the
person who uses services of coaching or coach gains different results. And it would be impossible to
achieve the same result since everyone is very different and our objectives are different.
1 task for independent work (see Appendix 1).
Self-control questions:
1. What were the separate social areas in which juncture the coaching occurred?
2. What is the main goal of coaching?
3. What are the differences between coaching, training and education?
4. Does the coach share experience, knowledge, abilities with the client?
5. Coaching is intervention of its type, in what areas it may be performed?
6. What are the main principles of coaching?
7. Why is the coaching conception portmanteau?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the subject - what kind of the coaching
conception is in the aspect of intersection of various social phenomena and areas?
1.1. Theoretical Aspects of Coaching. Searching for the Reconstructive Model. The main question of the subject is on what the main method of recognition of coach is
predicated?
It is considered that theoretical basics of coaching are in the process of formation at the moment.
Scientists are looking for the restorable model of coaching which would provide anticipated and
reliable results. Y. Richez (2006) states that the search for such model is hopeless since coaching
itself is considered as a three-dimensional (physical, emotional, mental), complex state of help.
Coaching – is the antithesis “I feel, therefore I think” for the Descartes thesis “I think, therefore
I am” (Damasio, 2001). If we agree with the assumption that the specific role of coaching is to
develop and expand human potential that may be developed only when there is an equal distribution
of attention for all three elements (physical, mental, emotional) then it is possible to state that
coaching - is a complex phenomenon. Human potential (available physical, mental, emotional
sources) is not the same as personality since human potential first of all is characterized by
biological and not by psychological nature. Therefore the breakthrough of person’s potential
sensually depends on the primary conditions.
Discussion: Is it true that internal human potential requires attention even for the smallest particulars and details, sensations?
“...I pity the people who look without seeing, listen without hearing, touch without feeling, eat without tasting, move
without physical awareness, inhale without awareness of odour. They are the mediocrities with their potential
sleeping” (Leonardo da Vinci).
One way out to make coaching as restorable, foreseen and reliable process is the removal of any
sensual element determining sensual dependence. Only later as H. Gardner (1997) indicates it is
possible to limit person’s bio-psychological variables, focusing attention on measurable and really
realizable aims of a person.
Therefore, the breakthrough of person’s potential sensually depends on primary conditions. One
way out to make coaching as restorable, foreseen and reliable process is the removal of any sensual
element determining sensual dependence. Only later as H. Gardner (1997) indicates it is possible to
limit person’s bio-psychological variables, focusing attention on measurable and really realizable
aims of a person.
Some authors (Delivré, 2002, Millman, 2008) support the idea of “situation’s potential” that
coach refers to when trying to help the client to understand the situation and to strengthen
effectiveness of help.
Coach is not a magician he can fully control neither the process nor the consequences. Instead
of equation: (plan) + (projection) + (circumstances) = friction / stress / psychological failure, the
coach uses the following equation: (plan) + (anticipation) + (circumstances) = success and lower
risk of psychological failure. Coach may only prognosticate the situation but he can not anticipate
all circumstances. He can prepare the client emotionally for every situation, help him make
decisions, but for this not only professional but also personal experience of the coach is required.
First of all the coach must understand the situation very well, want to experience it together with his
client. From this point coaching may be considered as a rather unsecured phenomenon, but although
this phenomenon is complex and sophisticated it is not complicated (Richez, 2006). Therefore the
coach gets closer to the form of restoration, recovery which would be adjusted to circumstances and
available person’s sources, potential of powers. Consequently the coach may not only foresee but
also to prevent from unfavourable circumstances using his personal characteristics and perception
of variables of environment.
The activities of each coach differ because of the applied coaching’s ways, methods, means,
even if all of them have completed the same courses, even if they work with the same clients since
the conditions will always be different and bio-psychological potential of coaches.
Another question of theoretical basis of coaching: is it possible to restore, to standardize, to
rationalize the method of recognition of the coach?
Discussion:
“If we relate the coach with the guide we must agree that in those days when there were not any break amplifiers,
GPRS connection, fog-lamps the only guide’s support and help was his bright knowing - methodicity (gr. Μ�τις),
rational, practical mind with three characteristic features: smartness, sharpness of the eye and insight of the mind.”
Why even nowadays any certificate cannot give and ensure possession or acquisition of these qualities since expression
of these features depends on various circumstances and situations?
Smart knowledge appears in any personal activity that requires the razzle-dazzle with hostile
powers, too powerful to control them directly, disregarding them that we could use them, not to
meet them face to face, with the help of unforeseen thing would pursue the anticipated goal (Fortin,
De Konik, 2006, p. 57).
Smart knowledge – coach’s way of recognition – is not of restorable nature but it is learnt. In order
the coaching was of restorable nature it is necessary that it was of limited duration, space, would be
characterized by a relatively calm emotional state, determined circumstances, measurable,
accessible, new tasks. However, the task is not a goal, a dream, a victim or a search, to which coach
would be able to respond. Consequently it is possible to speak about “logics of the thought” and not
about “logical thought” and referring to this at the same time to satisfy the imperatives of coach’s
professionalism and humanism of the activities.
Naturally, it is very important to introduce the theoretical basis of coaching but it is more important
not to wander to the labyrinths of descartism that R. A. Damasio (2001) respectfully but firmly
raised by transforming the famous thesis “I think, therefore I am” into antithesis “I feel, therefore I
think”. E. Morin (2004) stated that the purpose of theory is not to transform complexity into
simplicity, but to transform complexity into theory. Therefore it would be interesting for him to
know which part of complexity of coaching would be transformed into theory: coaching’s practice,
effectiveness, state, professionalism, process, interaction, methods, technique or something else.
Maybe most probably coaching’s goal should be transformed into theory – to help to develop and
emphasize the potential of human powers of the client. Y. Richez (2006) also states this.
The same author emphasized a three-dimensional (auto-, hetero-, eco-) educational factor of
coaching. H. Gardner (1993, 1997) substantiated a bio-psychological dimension of coaching.
Theoretical substantiation of coaching by Richez (2006) and H. Gardner (1997) limits itself only to
coaching’s reality, social, anthropological, cultural substantiation of phenomenon that refers to deep
structures of person’s intentions when integrating neuropsychological dimension (Damasio et al.,
2007). Discussion:
How do you understand this affirmation: “Theory is not a bearer of certainty, and this means that it may transform
into the dogma” (Gardner, 2001).
Definitely the difference between science and theory exists. Paradox of theory – rationalization,
standardization, normalization of coaching as actually existing phenomenon may become dogmatic,
whereas coaching itself is in the stage of constant evolution and dynamics. “Scientist must have
pragmatism and intuition” (Gardner, 2001). Here we encounter the paradox of science and scientist
(practitioners – thinkers) when referring to own senses a scientist might transform his intuition into
theory. “Not conceptualised intuition is an empty intuition but trying to ground everything
theoretically we risk changing everything into dead and inhuman ideology (Devillard, 2001).
Question:
What particular examples you know and may provide when illustrating this affirmation?
“None of the scientific services has not changed history, however big changes have been brought into it by several
scientists-volunteers who pursue their personal goals and are led by their intuition” (Gardner, 2001).
Coaching area of scientific researches. Coaching conception is portmanteau, consequently the
field of its scientific research is wide that expresses itself in the intersection of various social areas
of activity. The attention given by business and academic world for this area proves that coaching is
not just a passing fashion. Coaching area of object of scientific researches, although wide, but in
Lithuania has not been analyzed sufficiently. Coaching, such as we know, is about 20030 years old
(and in some places even less), however studies and researches of coaching have been started to be
performed in the beginning of last century. For example, a publication published in 1937 about the
fact when by using coaching, the more experienced leaders may help to new employees (Gorby,
1937), and an article published in 1938 about the fact when coaching may improve the curriculum
of sales employees (Bigelow, 1938) (quoted Grant, Spence, 2010). Meanwhile the first scientific
research (Gershman’s doctoral dissertation) on coaching was published in 1967, in it conditions that
should be implemented in order relationships of employee and his employer encouraged the better
activity of the employee were analyzed (Grant, Spence, 2010). Later appeared more exhaustive
researches intended for coaching, there was a search for its relationships with counselling
(Frohman, Kotter, 1977). There also should be mentioned researches of coaching of the ninth
decade of the twentieth century: Ponzo Z. (1980), who analyzed various roles performed by the
coach (sponsor and mentor); L. Tyson and H. Birnbrauer (1983) were one of the pioneers who tried
to substantiate coaching instruments and measures; E. M. Duffy (1984) analyzed in the dissertation
the feedback received during the coaching intervention; S. J. Stowell (1987) revealed links
between leadership and coaching in organization; C. D Orth., H. E. Wilkinson et al. (1987) again
substantiated various roles of the coach; A. D. Jr. Thompson (1987) was interested in educational
evaluation and individualization, when implementing coaching course intended for professional
managers. Therefore, it is possible to state that coaching is studied in many perspectives, however
the biggest attention is given for analysis of its efficiency in various areas. A question may occur
why science is interested in coaching? In a philosophical sense it would be thinking, subsistence
(Spence, Grant, 2007). Discussion:
Why is it stated that: “coaching first of all is a philosophy that is interested in questions of human subsistence and
potential (Spence, Grant, 2007)”?
Coach observes regularities, habits present in client’s life, speech, behaviour which encourages
or impedes new growth and new habits. Each person creates for himself behavioural models which
are substantiated by experiences from the past. Sometimes these models, which once were effective,
show wear, cease to be valid, but they are used anyway and the received results are resented.
Analysis and synthesis of values, beliefs, fortes and shortages, generation of new behavioural
alternatives and evaluation help to create new more powerful models (Gyllensten, Palmer, 2005).
For example, researches show that coaching reduces tension and stress and improves sense of well-
being in work (Gyllensten, Palmer, Farrants, 2005; Duijts, Kant, van den Brandt, Swaen, 2008),
coaching encourages bigger responsibility when pursuing for the set goals and better adaptability to
changes in the organization (Spence, Grant, 2007; Grant; Curtayne and Burton, 2009). And it is
achieved in such environment of organization where less directivity or policy of “hard hand
management” is present (Spence, Cavanagh, Grant, 2008). Coaching helps to consolidate the
In its case the coach wakes up client’s bio-psychological potential (many ways of thinking), he
pushes the client towards the activity that is required by the latter.
Coach becomes as a manager and supervisor in the moment of “liberation”, later
possible ways of activity are enlighten, but at the same time the client is warned and informed about
differences between previous, current and future way and available bio-psychological potential.
Although by nature coaching is a complex phenomenon, but it may be standardized,
and the thing that has been standardized may be certified.
2 task for independent work (see Appendix 1)
Self-control questions:
1. On which theories coaching are grounded?
2. Why the coach is unable to fully manage neither coaching process, nor consequences?
3. When and where the scientific researches of coaching area were started?
4. Are scientific researches of coaching necessary? If yes then where and for what purpose
they may be used?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the subject: on what the main way of coach
recognition is grounded?
1.2. Coaching Mechanism. Coaching Abilities when Solving Organizational and
Personal Problems
The main question of the theme is – how does coaching mechanism exist when removing
problems of organizational and personal nature?
It should be remembered that Y. Richez (2006) named coaching as a “complex but not
complicated” phenomenon, which complement is revealed by semantic, social-bio cognitive, vital,
intercultural categories (Jatkauskienė et al., 2008). Coaching complexicity is also explained by its
mechanism and systemic structural nature of coaching intervention.
Coaching mechanism. Coaching practice and mechanism are oriented to a situation, practice or
behaviour that is to be improved. Coaching’s objective is to overtake obstacles by overtaking
oneself. To overtake oneself means a wish to escape from the current situation, to return to own
convictions, values, attitudes, to risk despite restrictions of the everyday life, to experience new
thing that has never been experienced before. Coaching exists in the intersection of two spaces
(Figure 1):
Figure 1: Coaching space according to O. Devillard, 2001.
Coaching space is in the intersection of two factors influencing one another – in the situation of
resources possessed by the person (potential) and specific activities. The main mission of the coach
is adjustment of resources possessed by the client and specific situation when pursuing optimal
results of the activity.
Discussion:
1. In organization term “high potential” is also used when speaking about persons who have university degree
and high intellect, but what does it mean?
2. What is revealed by “low, little human potential” and how it is different from “high potential”?
The mission may be implemented in three ways: power to say, power to hear, and power to be
activated (stimulated).
Power (capability) to say is expressed like an occasion to state what was impossible to say
due to lack of time during conversation or due to the settled practice, relationships. Mostly
organisation is not the place for reflection even though the organisation would request this,
but reflection is disturbed by corporate interests, objective of productivity, profitability
determined by organization’s culture. Many things remain unexpressed by employees
because of the institutional reasons. Conversation will not only disclose policy of the
Specific
situation of
the activity
Potential
possessed
by the
person
(resources)
organization but also will help the members of the organization to understand themselves.
This is the goal of coaching – to strengthen practice of reflection of the organization.
Power (capability) to say is opposite to power to hear. We may say many things but not
always there is someone that will listen to us, will hear and understand. The coach creates a
favourable space for listening and understanding. Differences in image, age, social state,
duties, degree, experience of another person disturb listening and understanding. When
communicating with coach everything is different since the client and the coach, even
possessing the mentioned differences, are not related by links of dependence to the same
organization.
During coaching intervention special means and methods are used in order to activate the
clients, the internal powers possessed by them. Often people want to find the source of their
problems, to find out why it is so difficult to achieve the things they want. People want to
understand what they do in the wrong manner and why they feel the lack of their influence.
The answer is simple - people know their internal powers too little, and often they are afraid
of them, they are suppressed. But the truth is such that internal powers are just powers,
potential, and person whether is able to activate it and to use it or unable.
Consequently it is possible to state that coaching mechanism is grounded on: power to say,
power to hear, and power to be activated (stimulated). Discussion: In your opinion, what is more difficult for us - expressing of our opinion, or listening to it, or hearing? On what does it
depend?
What does this photo mean in the context of human intercommunion?
One of the problems which impede when pursuing for professional improvement, good
intercommunion, satisfaction in the being performed activity is the created negative system of
communication flourishing among the protagonists. Such subordinate and manager learn to
maintain personal or professional relationships which satisfy neither one side, nor the other, but
which are suitable for the nonce. All of this knocks back for organization: lower usefulness of the
employees; emotional wear and tear of manger and subordinate, loss of energy; degradation of
common microclimate; presence of conflicts (often) reducing productivity; for the usefully working
a work load increases since they must work instead of those who solve conflicts; conflict,
information crosses the limits of the organization and is harmful for its image.
Manager sometimes tries to change situation by first of all changing his own behaviour.
Then he tries to speak openly with the subordinate. However it is little effective because only the
manager may let himself speak openly about the recent conflict, the subordinate will not evaluate
manager’s behaviour, consequently it is only a one-way action that will not satisfy need of the
subordinate to acquire new competencies, to pursue for high-scoring. Solution: problems of few
people (common) must be solved when looking for common baselines. Both of them need coach
who, as the third party, would support, help, hear out, suggest looking for the solution together.
Systemic-structured nature of coaching intervention. Usually the process of coaching
intervention may be divided into several stages: diagnostics, situation analysis, creation of
scenario, organisation of implementation of scenario.
Intervention process differs depending on coaching area. Sometimes intervention is
directed to client’s behaviour or practice of professional activity, sometimes – to reflection when
pursuing for effective solution of the situation. However, process of intervention always maintains
the same stages. In any case coach’s activity refers to the client and interests of organisat ion, so
coach must provide absolute freedom and responsibility for his client when making any decision
since with help of intervention of the coach there is a goal only to improve personal and
professional activities.
Therefore, coaching is not the one-time means but a creative activity of activation
helping the client to change while new provisions and behaviour are forming, inviting to review
mental maps, world outlook of every person, conception and vision. External knowledge, provisions
are not imposed on the client, but he is activated to understand and to make decisions by himself.
Coaching abilities when solving problems of organizational and personal nature. According to
the law on entropy it is known that for each organism in a certain degree functions of activity may
disarray, problems of various natures may occur. We also know that immune system of life
organism fights with these disorders and try to maintain them minimal. In every group of activity
(also and in the adult learners’), in the organization there are many disarrays of organizational or
personal activity. They negatively affect results of activity, cause frustration, tension that reduces
productivity or high-scoring of persons. A group of learning adults is not an exception also for
which may help an andragogist by applying coaching techniques.
It is instituted that tension among group members is caused by three disturbances (kinks) of
activity (de Wilde, 2006) :
lack of recognition, evaluation of person and his activity;
lack of good intercommunion (anger, jealousy, open or closed conflicts, rumours,
mistrust, etc.);
absence of vision of final goals (organizations, teams, people).
These kinks of activity of organizations by M. de Wilde (2006) are named as triad of
organization or external triad (trinity). It should be mentioned that triad of organization or external
triad is closely related with kinks of personal activity which were named by the same author (de
Wilde, 2006) as individual or internal triad:
lack of recognition of one’s own needs, aspirations;
inadequacy of intentions and their expression (behavioural or verbal), that is noticed
by the surrounding people, inability to convey own aspirations, aims and desires, and
frustrations (disappointment);
lack of vigilance, when playing various psychological games and especially the
dramatic triangle.
Thus, it is possible to speak about twofold triad - organizational and individual.
Figure 2. Interaction of organizational and individual triad according to M. de Wild (2006)
It is possible to state the fact that work with organizational/external triad will be little
effective, if fundamental changes do not occur in the sphere of individual/internal triad. Discussion:
How should the coach know when it is necessary to direct his activity to external (corporate coaching), and when to
internal triad (individual coaching)?
Everything goes on that way as if a big gear (organization) stopped functioning well, if
its smaller wheels (employees of the organization) rejected to function. To apply collective
coaching when individual coaching is necessary is faulty as much as to try to adjust the clock,
irrespective of its broken parts. Thus, a certain methodology, technique is necessary in order to
transform the negative dynamics of triad into positive.
M. de Wild (2006) distinguishes the following elements of individual (internal) triad
and their interaction:
cognition/recognition of personal one’s own needs, aspirations. This means
cognition/recognition of one’s own deep powers, aspirations, talents, peculiarities,
abilities, capabilities. In other words - it is a reply to the famous phrase of Socrates,
graven on Delphi shrine “Know yourself”. Good self-knowledge gives self-confidence
and stability, at the same time it is like the main direction allowing finding of necessary
position, considering external events. A person who knows himself much less depends
on signs of external recognition. As recognition of one’s own needs, aspirations it is
possible to name ability to acknowledge one’s own particularity with its all darkest
sides, with all limitations. He will be able to communicate better with the surrounding
Recognition of
persona and his
activity
Organizational
(external) triad
Recognition/cognition of
aspirations
Individual
(internal) triad
Vigilance by
involving into
psychological
games
Quality of
intercommunion
Equivalence of
intentions and
expression
Visibility of
goals
people, he will be characterized with a smaller characteristic of tendency to
psychological games;
Discussion:
Will the person who has acknowledged to himself that he has negative characteristics tolerate more the shortages
of others?
equivalence of intention (purpose) and its expression (behavioural and verbal). All of
us have experienced, even though led by the best intentions, sometimes are unable to
express it in words and, not wanting to do it, we offend or displease another person. To
express oneself clearly is not that easy since it demands special vigilance in regard to
one’s own and listener’s ability to accept information. A particular proficiency is
required. Meanwhile an effective communication allows avoiding many cross-purposes,
frictions, creates relationships based on trust, positive dynamics, basis of synergy. Discussion:
If companions think that they understood each other, can they always mobilize their energy intended for creative
process or reflection? Do they always want it?
vigilance in respect of psychological games. It is horrible to think how wide various
psychological games are distributed in organizations. S. Karpman (2008) defines a
dramatic triangle that is present in organizations, where are discerned various
psychological roles played by various protagonists9, who were involved in the
psychological game. There are talks about roles of victim, pursuer, saver, their links, i.e.
conscious or unconscious manipulation, where the outcome was worsened
intercommunion, decreased energy. A number of such dramatic triangles were smaller if
people did not lose their vigilance and understood at once that they are about to be
involved into the game of which outcome are always negative. If we take a neutral
stance and encourage other protagonists to do the same then we will refuse of negative
energy intended for the game and at the same time we will be able to look for a way out
of the current situation acceptable to everyone. Discussion:
Is it always easy to not get involved in the psychological games? What would you suggest doing in order to avoid
this?
Elements of external triad (de Wilde, 2006):
recognition of person and his activity. All of us need recognition of personal and our
activity. This gives trust in one’s powers and own abilities, gives positive energy that
may be used for our reflection, creativity, improvement of the intercommunion and
other subjects. Consequently any organization has/would have to feed each its member,
as a certain sign of acknowledgment. Naturally, quantity of acknowledgment signs and
their rate alters depending on each characteristics of personal activities and beliefs,
provisions; Discussion:
Is it a positive or a negative sign of recognition: praise, adulation?
quality of intercommunion. We are social creatures, therefore we need communication
with the surrounding people. Organizational environment often is favourable to stressful
situations therefore there is enough of the intercommunion between very different
functional disarray of personalities. In such case organization tries to encourage
9 Protagonist [gr. prōtagōnistēs < prōtos — first + agōnistēs — actor], ancient Greek theatre — player of the most
important role (Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, 2010).
reciprocal understanding, to develop filed of reciprocal hearing and understanding and
to implement effective methods of communication. Here activity of team formation is
useful;
need for global, collective and individual visibility of goals (vision). Each person wants
to understand the meaning of his personal and professional life. Consequently
organization tries/will try to very clearly to set his goals, mission, vision, values for
each member of organization. Organization also will try to achieve for its global goals
to coincide with the goals of persons and members working in it. This coincidence will
be more clear if administration of the organization demonstrates with its behaviour the
declared values and provisions. A clear visibility of goals is the basis of the
organizational triad. Positive energy especially strongly reduces until finally melts after
it clashes with implementation of unclear or even contradictory goals. Discussion:
Why does the positive energy strongly reduces until it melts after clash with implementation of unclear or even
contradictory to each other goals?
If individual’s activity is not optimal it means that there is a disarrayed interaction with
the surrounding people and the whole external world. Individual sensually reacts to the disorder of
external functions. Even the slightest disorder of organizational nature may emotionally unsettle the
person and he will start acting inadequately, strangely, incorrectly, by thus more increasing the
disturbance of functions of the organization, by threatening to professional improvement of its own
and other employees. Also the following may be named: moral oppression or a syndrome of the
programmed failure. According to the data of the research performed in the USA (Campone,
2007), 42% of office employees work in such environment where are many conflicts, harassment
and bickers. In addition 27% of all workers of the USA are terrorized by their employers, they are
treated badly. Similar researches were performed in other countries. The results are similar. In
France M. F. Hirigoyen (2008) performed a research intended for identification of outcomes of
moral oppression. (Currently moral harassment is punished with deprivation of freedom or fine of
15 000 Euros).
Outcome of the moral harassment: in 24% of employees work quality and quantity reduced;
28% waste work time by trying to avoid moral oppression; 52% lose work time when imposing all
thoughts for fear regarding moral oppression; 50% think about changing the job; 26% of employees
are ill with chronic diseases; loss of high-scoring of organization is not identified.
Syndrome of the programmed failure: causes. Managers and coaches of all levels must know
how a manager may, even by not knowing it, destroy his, colleagues’ and organization’s effective
dynamics of activity. A case analysis was performed. It’s basis was a pre-programmed failure. Discussion:
Why in the example mentioned below a syndrome of pre-programmed failure is seen? What would you suggest
for the manager? For the employee?
Manager decided himself that the employee is not that useful like others. Consequently he was given less tasks of the
activity, they were easier than that of the others, only the control of the subordinate was enhanced. Thus manager for
such employee does not allow the possibility for even the smallest success or education of new competencies.
It is identified that a direct relationship between manager’s expectations and
subordinate’s usefulness. It is the Pygmalion’s effect, only the manager’s expectations may be both
positive and negative. Even if not that high-scoring employee (in manager’s opinion) reaches good
results, then it is considered to be as a coincidence. If after work hours the high-scoring employee
remains, mostly managers consider it as an expression of professionalism, and if less useful - as
incompetence (Farfel, 2002). Therefore anticipatory expectations of manager and the created filters
of monitoring of behaviour create a syndrome of programmed failure.
The mentioned syndrome has even more negative outcomes: subordinates conflict
with each other, because there is avoidance of communication with the manager due to
formation of possible negative tendencies; subordinates who work less usefully try to hide
problems and at the same time part of information; subordinates who work less usefully accept
the behaviour of retreat; if the intercommunion among subordinate and manager is tense and
negative, manager may break emotional relationships with the subordinate. When the
subordinate feels that he pays for the current situation with stress, spiritual discomfort, alteration
of productivity.
“The loser” subordinate also has his opinion about the manager. If the opinions are already
known (both to managers and to subordinates), then the subordinates after entering the group of
losers take the behaviour that guarantees failure: avoid communicating with manager; despise any
feedback; make a victim of themselves; transit to opposition (the only way to consolidate
themselves); seek for alliance with deputy manager/manager No. 2), and this step makes the
manager No. 1 irritated (Sherman, Freas, 2004).
Disarray of functions of organization causes stress for the individual, and he will start
working by activating more or less archaic10
mechanisms of defence: manipulation, aggression,
secret intentions, etc. Thus appears a negative dynamics that may cause disorder in activity of the
group or organization. Though is it possible to transfer a negative twofold triad into11
positive?
Each dynamics implicates energy. Scale of energy quality is wide: from a very positive
until very negative. If we agree with a postulate that work with internal/individual dynamics of triad
is necessary before work with organizational/external triad, then first of all it would be possible to
concentrate on individual triad and to transform its negative energy into positive.
It may be done by encouraging individual to assume responsibility and to “educate” his
needs, desires, etc., as a good father educates his children. After taking a corresponding distance of
one’s own thoughts, emotions, in respect of behaviour, as an adult would do when educating his
child - benevolently but without indulgence, person may take in his hands his destiny and well-
being. Thus mental human energy becomes positive and constructive. Consequently a person starts
to more optimally communicate with the surrounding people, to manage daily problems and at the
same time encourages occurrence of positive dynamics of organizational triad.
Positive dynamics of individual triad may be improved as follows:
support for a person when revealing, finding, one’s own needs and aspirations and by
accepting them. Organization has a possibility to implement a strategy of support when
improving personal effectiveness with particular actions: learning and coaching, which
may be initiated by members of the group. If that organization, where is a department of
development of human resources, it should take care of content and quality of services
of the learning and coaching;
support for persons when pursuing the more effective communication of members of
organization, for example, by clearly and in understandable manner formulating
applications or complaints. Many methods and techniques of this area exist (conflict
management, Marshall Rosenberg communication confident, P. de Taibi Kahler et al.);
support when educating vigilance regarding involvement into psychological games
(applied transactional analysis, neurolinguistic programming (NLP) or systemic access).
If in the level of individuals’ triad a positive dynamics starts to dominate, then
organization may expect success in the level of organizational triad as well.
When summing up it is possible to say that analysis of organizational and individual
triads and their interactions highlights the necessity of application of coaching mechanism, when
10 Archaic [gr. archaios], archaic, outdated (Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, 2010). 11 Dynamics [gr. dynamikos — power, powerful]:1. science, analyzing the relationship among mechanical movement of
system (faster, much slower than the speed of light) and external and internal powers which influence it; 2. variation,
expansion of some phenomenon; 3. music, the unity of sounds related with loudness creating the emotional tension of
music piece, emphasizing culmination, theme’s contrast; 4. alteration of intensity of flow of speech sounds
(Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, 2010).
first of all removing disorders of functions of individual triad. This is the basis of functionality of
the whole organization. Only after individuals assume their responsibility for the development of
their personal effectiveness, and after coordinating goals of the organization with aspirations of an
individual, when effectively managing the unpredicted problems, solving conflict situations and by
transforming their negative energy into positive that helps solving problems, only then it is possible
to find a compromise that is acceptable for each party not to involve into psychological problems,
to speak about the more efficient activity of the whole organization. Thus organization acquires
more possibilities for enhancement of its immune system and may become as a useful and a long-
lived system. Therefore, in the first place an individual is emphasized, and not a team or a strategic
coaching.
3 task for independent work (see Appendix 1)
Self-control questions:
1. On what the practice of coaching is oriented?
2. In what intersection of two one another influencing factors functions coaching mechanism?
3. What is the basis of coaching mechanism?
4. What kinks of activity cause tension among members of group, organization?
5. What does external organization triad mean in the context of coaching?
6. What does individual triad mean in the context of coaching?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the subject: how does coaching mechanism
exist when removing problems of organizational and personal nature?
1.3. Individual, Collective (Team) Coaching. Coaching and Organizational
Culture
The main question of the theme is – what are the similarities and differences of individual
and corporate (team) coaching what are the similarities and differences of individual and
corporate (team) coaching?
“One does not make a donkey drink if it isn't thirsty”
Spanish proverb
It was already mentioned that coaching is a complex and miscellaneous phenomenon.
It was emphasized that according to the coaching areas (behavioural development, career
projecting, improvement of practical activity, development of personal internal powers, support
during strategic changes, etc.) coaching categories are divided into – individual and team
(corporate), strategic coaching (Devillard, 2001). Each coaching category is divided into separate
forms of coaching:
individual coaching and its forms: technical coaching (education of person’s
development, coaching of decision making/problem solving, tutorship, mentorship,
educational management);
team coaching and its forms (team Building, team Development, coaching of system
activities etc.);
organizations’ coaching (strategic coaching), intended for organization’s managers of
various experiences. Discussion:
Why separate coaching categories and forms exist? What determines it?
According to the name itself, individual coaching is directed to single persons, and
corporate coaching – to collective of the activity (e.g. team, managers, technical personnel,
subdivision or group of learning adults). Individual and corporate coaching is characterized by
different structure. However both of them are oriented to the improvable situation, practice or
behaviour (Židonienė, 2009) .
Team coaching emphasizes both technical and human cohesion with regard to goals of
organization and activity of team members. Coaching of education of personal improvement
(personal efficiency) more emphasizes the anticipated, desirable situation than the acting person.
In order to ensure in the competence of the coach it is necessary to specify the principles
of his activity. A competent specialist has a required certificate, and his practice and methods are
different from that of counselling, observation or training. The mentioned areas of practice are
based on knowledge, learning. Coaching is based on “insight”, understanding, when pursuing for
approach with regard to the alteration analyzed by the situation (Turner, Hevin 2007). This
coaching peculiarity allows relating the separate elements into the unit for understanding when
transiting from one state into another. Coach helps client to understand the situation but he can not
do it instead of him. It is similar to birth during which doctor only helps to give birth for a woman
(Devillard, 2001). Discussion:
As it was already mentioned, coaching client, and not the coach takes a central place. Then why the coach is
necessary?
Client knows himself, situation and has enough competencies. If client agrees to
participate in coaching then that is only because he wants to feel better, to perceive better, to
acquire a different attitude with regard to complicated situation, and not in order to know something
more. After acquiring a different attitude to the situation client will find a way out of it more easily.
Coaching will let to the client to improve his competencies, style of activity, depending on the
possessed talent, internal potential.
In case of andragogists also may be applied both and individual, and team coaching. For
example, andragogists often complain of the adult learners by stating that they lack of initiative. In
such case coach may help andragogist by suggesting making a list of two parts. In one part
andragogist writes everything what he does, in the other - what he does not do. Coach asks adult
learners to do the same. After comparing the lists of andragogist and learners, it is possible to
identify if the andragogist does not take initiative from the learners, by performing the majority of
their functions and consequently he overworks in his job or he does not perform his main functions
as an andragogist. The coach is able to find out this during the first meeting. During the second
meeting, a coach will find out why andragogist does not allow for the learners to perform their
functions and will identify the reasons for such behaviour. According to researches (Richez, 2006),
andragogists take imitative and perform functions of learners since they are afraid that the learners
would not make mistakes that could have influence on prestige of organization, andragogist, on
social stability or growth, number of clients, etc. Even the best courses intended for delegation of
functions will never reveal to andragogist or to the learner his fears and their consequences with
regard to enterprise of activity. For such andragogist coaching not only gives more knowledge in
the field of delegation of functions, but also allows looking in the distrust in learners and at the
same time to enhance the efficiency of his activity.
Currently next to individual and collective categories of coaching (education of personal
development and decisions’ making) there is coaching of another form - technical coaching
First of all it is important to emphasize that this model is not hierarchical, but features of different
ways of learning are described in it. In some cases a superficial learning is totally acceptable - I
know only superficially how engine of my car works however I hope that knowledge of auto
mechanic is, if not thorough, deep at least. Also it is very important not to apply academic values
for this model. Thorough learning encompasses mysterious branches of philosophy, consular
characteristics and child’s insight. Discussion:
This statement needs your comments:
“In many cases superficial learning is similar to the dominating ways of learning since it is built on saving of
information and repetition. Though it does not prevent from deep and thorough learning, however, learning of such
nature limits possibilities for avoidance of superficiality”.
Superficial learning was totally sufficed in such society and in such work places where a
high level of dependence and obedience was present. If we believe that world gets more
complicated it means that dominating way of learning will have to change. Maybe the superficial
learning was totally suitable for a rather simple world where less option were present and more
political and economical dominance, however that kind of learning will not be sufficient in the
world where many various options are present and which is lacking in commonness of opinions. It
is possible that the worst feature of superficial learning is the fact that when learning superficially
the biggest attention is given to external motivation, obedience and dependence.
Meanwhile the deep learning gives ground for understanding, i.e. for the events which take
place when information of general nature becomes as personal knowledge which may be used at
any time in various contexts. Experience is understood through thinking, and motivation for
learning comes from the inside.
After choosing the deep learning it is possible to interpret, trust is gained through the
interdependent learning. Thorough learning is of totally different meaningful nature. When learning
superficially to systemically decide the correspondingly provided tasks are learnt. The deep learning
means that it is learnt to formulate, assess and apply many different solutions. When applying the
method of thorough learning, tasks and solutions are defined again. Thorough learning - is creation
of personal meaning that gives wisdom and stimulates creativity. Experience is formed intuitively.
Motivation to learn comes from moral incentives, and the result of thorough learning is ability and
wish to conflict with convention. Basis of such learning is interdependent thinking and solving of
tasks.
Learning of one-fold cycle is superficial. More often we concentrate on level “who?” than
on levels “how?” or “why?” Such learning is repetition. Basically those who choose deep learning
know how to create knowledge. They reflect on it, what and how is learnt. Thus deep learning os
learning of two-fold cycle that “takes place when the occurred errors are corrected by changing...
old norms, politics and goals” (Chris Argyris and Donald Schön, 1974, 67 p.). Learning of three-
fold cycle encompasses not only the levels “what?” and “how?”, but also the level “why?” When
learning thoroughly the understanding of the fact what makes us as the unique personalities
changes, therefore abilities to create valuable and meaningful for our life-style strategies are
developed.
Cycles of learning (loops) and professional improvement are closely correlated. With
reference to works of North American scientists Schön14
and Argyris, there is a suggestion to
discern four cycles of learning which may enable a professional to learn (Le Boterf, 2010):
Figure 3. Cycles of learning (loops) according to G. Le Boterf (2010)
This scheme explains four models of learning:
during the course of the first learning loop subject learns when limiting himself with
correction of his practice, when comparing the received results with the anticipated results:
he does not think about substantiation of his activity. Rules of the activity may be corrected,
but operational schemes which predicate practice, main principles, and theoretical basics are
maintained. He learns by approving the applied rules, he is ready to apply new or to correct
the existing rules of the activity. It is possible to learn the legerdemain or professional art
secrets: this first loop is the loop of ingenuity;
14 Argytis C., Schön D. Theory in practice: increasing Professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
INTENTION
AND GOALS
THEORIES OF
ACTIVITY,
PRINCIPLES,
REPRESENTATIO
NS
RULES OF THE
ACTIVITY
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE RESULTS
OPERATIONAL SCHEME
4 loop
3 loop
2 loop
1 loop
during the course of the second learning loop subject learns when contravening the
operational scheme and theoretical basics of his activity. Initial goals or intentions remain
unchanged, operational scheme remains basically the same, only corrected. Some stages of
the being applied activity may be changed, others may be added. Reasoning may be purified
or changed. Theoretical notions may be deepened or enriched;
during the course of the third learning loop subject learns by changing the operational
scheme and/or theoretical basics. He must learn to act in a totally different way with
reference to new knowledge, by reviewing the main principles, by changing representations
of certain situation, it may be necessary to change his intentions with regard to the being
pursued goals;
during the course of the fourth learning loop subject learns to learn. The three previous
loops of learning become as an object of learning. He learns to better use them, to get better
lessons of experience.
The given figure illustrates a method how the learning process makes the discursive and logical
loops work. If we remove the loops, there will not be any learning.
Question:
In which cycle of learning (loop) you would “put yourself” with regard to knowledge of theory of educational management and making oneself master of its practice?
Strategic coaching is help for managers of organization or for a team of managers or group,
irrespective of their record of service and possessed experience, as they seek to implement strategic
goals of organization. One of strategic goals of organization is development of professional
improvement of employees, education of their independence. Consequently in this case there is a
goal not to repeat some already known model of professional improvement, but to educate
independent of employees by looking differently into real situations of activity, employees’
efficiency, regularity, adaptability to constant changes of activity.
When summing up it is possible to state that pursuing for regularity when learning underlies
professional improvement and difference of experiences and professional experience. Experience
and professional improvement related with it is a construct of the things which have been
experienced. Person may remain for a long time in the same situation of activity and not to gain
experience, therefore not to improve. For gaining of experience time is obligatory but insufficient
condition. Duration originates from linear, unity sequence. Time of activity may not be turned back.
The loops must be reflected for the experiences to become as the experience, for we could improve.
And in this activity a coach, who knows strategic coaching well, could be helpful.
4 task for independent work (see Appendix 1)
Crossword
Self-control questions:
1. How do you understand the strategic coaching?
2. What is it basically used for?
3. Can it be team-oriented?
4. How specifically the activity of the coach can manifest itself in case of professional
improvement?
5. How professional improvement may be explained irrespective the fact for how long the
person works in the particular organization?
6. Do all employees improve and learn in similar methods? What determines it?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: what are the links between
sixteen types are widely used all over the world; Process Com (PC) – typology model of personal
features (six types: persevering, work addict, creator, dreamer, empathic, protester/rebel) etc. Discussion:
What studies or disciplines in university could give knowledge about the mentioned coaching techniques, means and
instruments?
The question is if a professional andragogist can, is able, is up to apply the mentioned
techniques and means in his activity. Professional andragogist providing coaching services should
have the following qualities:
First of all, he must be able to be ,,here and now”, i.e. available, easily found, what is of
high importance for adult learner;
He must be able to isolate himself from his thoughts and to listen attentively to adult
learner so that he could hear not only orally transferred information, but also read
between the lines, understand intonation, breathing, facial expression, sight and energy
prevailing in the coaching process (Agarwal, Angst, Magni, 2009);
He must be able to listen to adult learner using all sensors and intuition. Discussion: Why is it insufficient for andragogist to hear through „ears“ only?
Heard information becomes a foundation for questions increasing adult learners’
understanding about him and related micro and macro universal phenomena. In the
course of coaching the questions lead the adult learner to lose his piece of mind and
induce unusual and creative thinking, motivate to develop efficient solutions, find own
truths and answers. Silence fluctuating during the process is a feature of effective
coaching, because magic things take place in the silence… lurking personal powers
awake, fear disappears, courage and motivation appear, sight and body posture change
and face expands in a happy smile (Agarwal, Angst, Magni, 2009). But the best thing is
that this energy rush is long term.
It is thought that the following skills are important for andragogist who apply coaching in
adult education (Lenhardt et al., 2007):
Active listening to the deep, internal motivation of the client;
Positive assessment of others and yourself;
Conflict-solving ability;
Consideration of emotion while communicating with others;
Human change management;
Coaching technique management (e.g.: active listening, questioning, neuro-linguistic
When summing up the assumption that the andragogist although he does not have a
coach certificate, but is a professional in the field, he can supply coaching services for adult
learners cause this art is manageable, techniques learnt and the mission stimulates the proper fulfil
of helper function.
There are no skills or techniques of realisation of specific help for adult learners that
the andragogist would not be able to acquire, manage or improve. Most commonly people do not
think that most experience ever gained and skills acquired in the course of studies could be
„...moved to other fields of activity or other field operational situations by proper modification of
activity diagrams and professional representations“(Le Boterf, 2010, 73 p.). However, apparently
it is impossible even too imagine how the andragogist could render assistance not having any clear
and particular conception of learning problem (difficulty) (Jatkauskienė et al., 2011).
Self-control questions:
1. In what field of activity could the andragogist apply coaching?
2. Why an application of coaching in adult education is a paradox?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: is an andragogist able to
apply coaching in adult education?
2.1. Links Between Learning Problems and Areas of Coaching Application
The main question of the theme is – how are learning problems linked to coaching
application?
Learning problem – [obstacle, difficulty, task] – 1. an objective question that occurred
in the cognitive process, of which decision has basic meaning for cognitive advancement; 2. an
objection that originated from consciousness that must be settled by the individual. Problems are
educational, scientific, practical, artistic, domestic, personal, etc. (Jovaiša, 2007, p. 233). Task of
learning as an objective new requirement in the consciousness of the learner becomes as a problem,
that sometimes may be solved easily, and sometimes more efforts are required. Personal problem is
considered to be an internal difficulty that may not be settled on one’s own efforts that is limiting
normal living, that encourages seeking for help (Jovaiša, 2007, p. 233). Difficulty is a state of
personality that prevents from adaptive and adequate behaviour and work, which is experienced as a
tiresome, troublesome, burden. Difficulties originate from innate weak ability to adapt of an
individual or from unfavourable environmental conditions. Pedagogists, andragogists, psychologists
help to overcome difficulties according to their competence, by considering the extent of the
difficulty. Difficulty becomes as a personal problem when there is a wish to get rid of it and to ease
internal state (Jovaiša, 2007, p. 279). Therefore it is possible to state that difficulty is not identical
to the learning problem that mostly depends on external factors and is quite of temporary nature.
Difficulty mostly depends on internal factors and requires bigger efforts in order to remove it.
However in any case the cause of learning problems arising in adult learning and difficulties must
be identified and eliminated. Discussion:
Solution of what learning problem or difficulty requires more efforts according to Yours learning experience?
Give examples of how teachers or andragogists helped/did not help you to eliminate these problems.
From the concept of provided learning problems and difficulties it may be stated that
the learning problem from the aspect of adult educational institution and andragogist‘s activity is
any difficulty negatively influencing an individual in the course of learning. Nonetheless,
andragogists take some active preventive measures (orientation, learning programmes complying
with the needs of adult learners, creation, creation and implementation of didactical situations
emphasizing learning goals, provision of previously acquired skills required for course assimilation,
selection of methods, sources and mediums etc.), it should be noted that learning problems
constantly arise in learning process constantly provoking failure and even fall out of formal and
informal educational system.
The concept of learning problem/difficulty is linked to the variety of elements of
learning situation: learning person and his various human complexes, learning person and his
relationship with learning contents, lecturer, andragogist and his activity style, educational
institution and social – economic context (e.g.: payment for tuition, courses, going for courses,
accommodation issues etc.) Each mentioned element could be considered a problem/difficulty.
Therefore every effort might be made to determine the problem in real learning situation, only then
specific ways, means and methods of help could be envisaged.
Learning problems may be summarised as follows: cognitive, psychomotoric,
psychosocial, affective - motivational nature
Fig. 4. Classification of learning problems
The problems are mostly of cognitive nature. These problems are related to knowledge,
coding and collection of information, processing of information and knowledge etc. They could be
related to verbal or written language expression, perception, rhythm of learning, remembering,
management of complex real activity tasks, transition from theory to practical application, planning,
spatial vision, concept of task, learning and activity, equilibrium between global and local access.
Another type of learning problem is affective – motivational nature (panic, loss or lack of
motivation, „blocking“, impulsivity, denial of theoretical knowledge (negation, rejection), lack of
concern for learning contents etc. (a totality of processes that stop, orientate, block cognitive or
motor activity). It may be stated from experience that this type of problems (especially nervous
disturbances, even panic) is quite often. It is thought that the reason of such problems is earlier
negative experience from learning (e.g.: stress as a result of tests, examination, failures experienced
at secondary school). Learning problems of psychomotoric nature often take place in the course of
acquire specific professional skills or develop professional behaviour. There are psychosocial
learning problems related to psychological, social factors that determine personal reciprocity (lack
of self-confidence, lack of confidence in lecturers, andragogists, group members, social learning
obstacles, adaptation to group activity, relationship problems etc.). Therefore it may be stated that
problems of different nature arise in the course of learning situation in learner‘s everyday life.
Learning situation is a complex phenomenon where several variables may be distinguished:
attitudes and position of person analysing learning situation (e.g.: the psychologist will
focus his attention not to the learning problem, but to the person at first; in coaching –
the attention will be paid to the problem and future projection);
the reasons of learning problems are of multiple nature. There is an interrelation
between cognitive and affective – motivational learning problems (e.g.: if a task of
cognitive nature is not understood, confidence in self-competence of the learner
decreases);
Learning
problems
Cognitive nature
Affective -
motivational
nature
Psychomotoric
nature
Psychosocial
nature
incomprehension of the reasons of learning problems (e.g.: the learner fails to
comprehend the reason of learning problem therefore is not able to perform deep
analysis of the problem).
To ensure effective support to the learner, not only learning problems/difficulties are
defined and described, but also means for verification of learning problem/difficulty hypotheses
formulated in the course of analysis are envisaged, i.e. observed problem and its reasons are
specified (Jatkauskienė et al., 2011). Such means could include various conversations, analyses of
learning styles, analysis of self-effectiveness etc.
As it was already mentioned, all learning problems are interconnected and influence
each other, therefore to eliminate a problem or provide support, the andragogist should play
different roles (tutor, coaching expert, mentor) and manage different supporting means, categories
and techniques.
Fields of application of coaching in adult education may be modelled after analysis of
publication of various authors listed in references, and linkage of coaching subject to the
classification of learning problems and difficulties (fig. 5.):
Fig. 5. Fields of application of coaching in adult education
Cognitive improvement refers to getting new representations, knowledge, development
of new knowledge, new interpretations, management of learning process itself; social improvement
refers to development of professional identity of a person, improvement of behaviour, promotion of
independence from other people (including the coach); affective improvement refers to self-
confidence, training by own efforts; personal/professional improvement refers to realisation
personal and professional goals (Turner et al., 2007).
The field of cognitive improvement should be analysed in detail. Here the andragogist is
a lecturer providing coaching services could help adult learners to achieve their learning outcomes.
Fields of
application of
coaching in adult
education
Cognitive
improvement
Social improvement
Affective
improvement
Personal/professiona
l improvement
Fig. 6. Methods and possibilities of learning
Discussion:
What can andragogist do from the perspective of the learning pyramid:
5 p.c. only are learned during lectures and 90 p.c. while learning others? (source: NATIONAL Training Laboratories,
Bethel, Maine, 2011).
Most andragogists are familiar with B. Bloom‘s taxonomy which is very important for
examinations and different tests. Examination matrix is created based on it. However, R. Marzano‘s
taxonomy of educational objectives is not less important in the learning process. According to R.
Marzano‘s taxonomy cognitive levels are divided according to the control of processes of psychical
activity, not to the degree of complexity – i.e. how the processes control another processes. R.
Marzano‘s created system illustrates how a person decides starting a new task, explains processing
of information after such decision is taken: at first, so called human „Ego“ („Me“) system decides;
is it advisable and is it any use to start a new task (Marzano, 2005). It is a very important decision,
and any negative experience can negatively influence the decision. Only a good emotional mood,
positive attitude motivate to improve and overcome the obstacles. Then metacognitive system
envisaging task objectives and performance strategies is activated, and cognitive system starts
processing all appropriate task information (Marzano, 2005). All system levels apply learner‘s
collected knowledge of different fields. R. Marzano‘s taxonomy of educational objectives not only
shows the importance of knowledge, but also explains the importance of learner‘s motivation for
task completion. It is an activation of „Ego“ system, therefore the coach seeks for the most
interesting material and various work methods allowing for activation of the mentioned system. This statement needs your comments:
„Didactic strategies applying „Ego“ system increase the average value of achievement even 27 percent (Marzano,
2005). Therefore the andragogist should make an effort for the adult learner to perceive learning as an independent decision, not a pressure“
Learning others
90 p. c.
Practical application
75 p. c.
Discussion group
50 p. c.
Demonstration 30 p. c.
Audio and video material
20 p. c.
Reading
10 p. c.
Lectur
es
5
pro
c.
.„Ego“ system is activated when the learner unwillingly starts doing a task in case of
earlier failure with similar task, when his objective assessment shows lack of knowledge and
comprehension of the procedure. In this case the andragogists will motivate and ride at success the
learner by providing him with a set of instruments required for task completion.
Special technologies are applied in the course of andragogists coaching intervention
(e.g. conversation) – it is a totality of methods, relations between people, style of thinking and
techniques stimulating fulfilment of internal potential of personality, achievement of maximum
personal efficiency and life balance, providing clearer coaching technology – is a link between
coaching, andragogy theory and coach and client‘s practice. Coaching technologies is a wider
concept compared to coaching techniques. They help the learner to clarify objectives and find the
ways of realisation. It is also communication and education culture and even lifestyle. The most
important provision is to believe that „I“ and the people around have sufficient internal potential to
achieve more goals. According to experts (Devillard, 2001; Lenhardt et al., 2007), the future of
coaching depends on scientifically proven technologies.
All new subjects appear for reason. Coaching application in andragogist practice is not
an exception. Appearance of coaching some years ago was like a response to no longer effective
educational technologies. It may be stated by experience that earlier advices how to become a
successful student, learner, were a novelty. Nowadays, in the century of information, it is difficult to
surprise anyone. People have heard everything. However, we still try to accumulate more and more
knowledge. The trouble is that we do not put this knowledge into practice. Therefore coaching
reminds that exploitation of accumulated potential may help to implement objectives. Discussion:
„Knowledge is the key to success. Therefore like perpetual students we strive to gain as much as possible.
However, coaching experts say severe „stop“ and call not only to accumulate knowledge, but also finally start using it.
Coaching helps to achieve this. Coaching will not wash off traditional teaching from the ground surface. After all, good
results could not be achieved without valuable knowledge. However, an application of group coaching methods during courses or seminars showed that training has become more effective“ D. Čibonis, 2007.
The following activity elements could be distinguished in andragogists activity applying
different coaching techniques and methods (Amar, Angel, 2006):
determination and preservation of activity field (intervention);
definition of activity of andragogist who plays coach‘s role;
concentration to student‘s (client‘s) application for help;
ability to listen and ask;
conception of compatibility, conformity (verbal, paraverbal, nonverbal communication);
confidence in other person;
demonstration of positive acceptance signs;
adaptation to cognitive student‘s (client‘s) style.
All listed activity elements will be explained in complete detail in the sections below.
When summing up it can be stated that although the coaching applied in adult
education is based on the main principles and mechanism of coaching activity, there is a certain
difference: andragogist may be not a certified psychologist or certified coaching expert. He helps
adult learners driven by mission, andragogist‘s deontological codex and competencies.
6 task for independent work (see Appendix 1)
Self-control questions:
1. Is it possible to combine learning problem with difficulty?
2. What are the natures of learning problems?
3. What are adult educational fields where the coaching could be applied?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: how are learning problems
linked to coaching application?
2.2. Determination and Preservation of Activity Field (Intervention) of the
Andragogist who Plays Coaching Specialist’s Role The main question of the theme is – why is it important to define the limits of activity field of
the andragogist providing coaching services?
Concept of the field. Sociological vision of P. Bourdieu allows analysing the society applying
interaction of „fields“, because „society – is more or less a totality of autonomous social fields“
(Bourdieu, 1994).
The theory of fields is based on the statement that social peace is a point of
progressive differentiation process. Society attempts to reveal the universe, divide the fields as a
product (result) of social work division. Such division unlike technical work division covers the
whole social life because in the course of such differentiation process various religious, economic,
legal, political, social and other functions are segregated. Discussion:
What does the following statement implies in the context of coaching?: „The field could be understood as a market where characters behave as players (Bonnewitz, 2002“.
From the analytical viewpoint the field could be defined as a network or configuration
of objective relationship between taken positions. These positions are objectively determined by the
conditions of existence that specify certain requirements for representatives, characters and
institutions. P. Bourdieu named such phenomenon „universal law on field“. Comprehension of the
concept is possible by comparison. The truth of the matter is that the field could be understood as a
market with manufacturers and consumers. The manufacturers who dispose of special capital are in
conflict with each other. The reason of such conflict is a form of disposed capital that ensures
predominant position in the field. Herewith the capital becomes a tool or objective. The structure of
field in the modern history demonstrates power relationship between the players. Thus, the field is a
space of opposing powers.
For better explanation of behaviour of social players in the field P. Bourdieu continues
with game analogy (Bourdieu, Wacquant, 1992). Discussion:
What are the main players in coaching and what are the game rules in intervention of the coach?
The strategy of a player depends on the volume, structure of capital, aim of the game
(accumulate, preserve capital) taking into account the rules of game. The aim for individuals of
predominant positions is to preserve capital; the players can try to find different ways to change the
rules of game, for example, discrediting the value of opponent’s capital. Here the case is
devaluation strategy often used by not dominant individuals.
Concerning the specialities of each field, the fact that each of them has individual
history and rate. Therefore the fields are autonomous and independent. However, to separate the
fields is very complicated because of lack of clearly defined limits. Moreover, they influence each
other; the position of social player in specific field depends on their position in social space.
Determination and preservation of activity field of the andragogist providing coaching
services is important because it helps to understand and define the limits of fields of andragogist
and adult learner as well as their roles. The intervention to not agreed field is impossible (Lenhardt,
2002). After investigation of the activity of coaches it has been found that their activity field covers
not only direct work with clients, but also organisational work and determination of need for
support/help. The most important centre line here is determination of client’s needs and then –
creation and development of effective help strategies.
The following questions must be answered to determine and preserve activity
(intervention) field: who was left beyond the limits? How could it be understood that the activity
(intervention) happens inside specific field? Adhere to the deontological rules of coaches? How to
remind the learner about activity field in case he tries to overstep defined boundaries?
Coach’s (andragogist’s) activity field – concern of negotiation and agreement. Personal
and professional improvement, project of improvement (not the whole activity, work, family, love...
of the learner) defines limits of the field. Activity field implicates clear determination of roles of
coach (andragogist) and learner (not friend- friend…). Activity field is justified on personal request
of the learner (therefore is not imposed). Andragogist should clearly declare that the intervention
take place inside specific field: virtual (e-mail, telephone, support), real: (by saying „we are here
to… „). In any case the andragogist explains and applies five coaching deontological rules (Turner
et al., 2007):
Aim of coaching – support at improvement;
Absolute confidentiality;
Respect for person, his values and choice;
Control of behaviour;
No assessment of behaviour (or at the end of intervention only upon authorization or
request of the learner). Discussion:
Reminding about activity field, return of client to the field not always satisfy the client. What challenges does the
andragogist meet?
Reminding about activity field, return of adult learner to the field may be performed
with the help of the following questions: Could you, please, remind me the goal of our meeting?
Why do you ask me? What do you expect from me? How can I help you? What do you think is the
interrelation between our meeting and your current question? I realize that this is a problem for you,
but it has nothing to do in our case. We will be able to get back later if you wish (Amar, Angel,
2006). Reminding about activity field, return to it may displease the learner, but the andragogist
cannot allow violation of limits. The andragogist should define the limits between his personal and
professional field, separate his personality from task and say „no“ to the request without rejection of
applicant. If the applicant does not stop, say: „I understand your need, but cannot respond at the
moment“ (Lenhardt, 2002).
Activity element of the andragogist providing coaching services – determination and
preservation of intervention field – is compulsory for every coaching application area.
Self-control questions:
1. How would you explain the concept of field according to P. Bourdieu?
2. How do you understand coaching activity (intervention) field?
3. What could be the limits of this field?
4. Could the reminding about activity field, return to it, not satisfy the client? Why?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme – why is it important to define
the limits of activity field of the andragogist providing coaching services?
2.3. Setting of Goals The main question of the theme is – how to set appropriate coaching goals?
Goal setting theories. People will work, act, learn, and improve hardly if they believe to get
a reward. It is Vroom’s Expectancy Theory (1964). According to the theory, people are interested to
behave in a way they would achieve desired goals. How person comprehends, interprets analysed
situation is determined by his thinking (cognitive powers). Vroom’s Expectancy Theory is focused
on personal expectations that his behaviour will allow to achieve desired goal, which is of different
significance (valence) and may assist in achieving second level (further) expectations
(instrumentality). In addition, the expectation goes along with certain belief of achievement
(expectation). Thus, the expectations of individual (valence, instrumentality) are psychologically
related and elicit internal powers (motivation), and „economy“ person chooses the level of activity
performance that meets his interests to the maximum. There is no motivation, if activity goals have
negative valence, no achievement of other level expectations, and the person does not believe in
fulfilment of his expectations in activity.
Another is goal setting theory (Locke, 1968). The main principles of the theory are as
follows:
Complicated goals determine better activity implementation than easy goals;
Specified goals determine better activity implementation than general goals;
Feedback information about activity implementation is necessary to get a benefit
from complicated specified goals.
It is claimed (Locke, 1968), there must be interrelation between specific task and activity goal;
so that the person gets motivation when he understands the activity goal and task relation to it. The
person must “find“ the goals himself, therefore he becomes responsible for goal realisation. Goal
setting for the andragogist providing coaching services is a compulsory element for every coaching
application area. It helps to find answers to two topical questions relevant for parties (both for
andragogist and learner) (Miller et al., 2004):
How to realise that learner’s request for help is realistic and what to do if he thinks it is
impossible to satisfy his request?
How to foresee appropriate coaching goals?
If there is no real request for help, someone may think that the learner considers
coaching unnecessary or forced. The request should often be reworded to make it real. If the learner
does not agree with the new request, it means he does not need any help. In case of paradoxical
request („I have a problem, have tried everything, nothing helps...“), the confinement of person on
victim position must be destroyed, and attention should be focused on stimulation of motivation.
After solution for the first question is developed pass to the second question – what is
the goal of the client (adult learner)? A particular measurable goal must be specified and realisation
data indicated. It is necessary to record the goal and data – in other words, to leave written sign
(proof). Pay attention, the client (adult learner), not coach (andragogist), must formulate the goal
(Turner, 2006).
Prior to considering possible strategies of work with client’s goals, type of goals in the
framework of coaching should be considered:
goals as essential objectives;
goals as a new (other) behaviour;
goals as events or new situations.
Apparently, professional coach should select different work strategies for each category
of goals. From the other hand, it is assumed that despite activity strategies, the client must at fist
evaluate the significance of his goal and how it answers his values in all cases. What does he get
from? Who does he become? How does it change him? It can be stated that the goal becomes
achievable when it corresponds to fundamental client’s believes and values. Then the client
becomes more motivated, more powerful for generation of ideas, discovers more creative and non-
traditional ways of goal achievement.
If the client will realize the significance of the goal he achieves, sense and benefits of
achievement, he will enable himself to taking risk and responsibility for action – go towards his
goal.
Despite the client’s goal is expressed in the course of coaching, it is no use to define it
and rush to find the ways of achievement. First of all, the person must clearly understand the
significance of his goal and its contribution to self-development. One gets the impression that we
somehow "control" client’s goals. Definitely not. For some reason I believe that people who want to
develop as soon as they realize their goal, analyse it and “examine” from all sides, become able to
act (Misiukonis T. 2012. Asmeninio ugdymo praktika. Vilnius: Vaga).
So coaching should be oriented not to some steps or actions, but to help the client to
understand himself, to see the wider context of his existence. It contradicts often mechanical and
superficial coaching models. If the coach will fall to “chase” client’s goals, rush “helping” to
implement, he may face the following risks (Misiukonis, 2012)15
:
clients may indicate superficial „false“ goals for the reason to please the coach and not to
interrupt coaching conversations. Every client wishes to be a good client;
clients may indicate too easily achievable goals. In this case really necessary changes will
not be discussed;
clients may indicate unclear goal priorities. All the energy will be focused on the analysis of
irrelevant goals, and the essential goals will be left not discussed.
Questions to clarify the illustration, realise client’s goals: what will you achieve by
realisation of the goal? What does the goal gives you? How is the goal linked to your values? Who
will you become (what will happen) after realisation? What will you understand after achievement?
What do you want to reach by this desire? What do you want to prove? What is the sense of your
goal for yourself? What greater subject does the goal constitute?
One psychology study (Oettingen, Mayer, 2002)16
has proved that that those too much
positive in regard to their goals (work, partner, examination, health) showed lower results in
achieving their goals than those who seem to be more pessimistic in the perspective of their goals.
Essential conclusion according to research authors indicates that people less positive in regard to
their perspectives analyse their abilities considering their own experience and justify their
expectations by the same experience. While too positive people support their expectation not by
experience, but by future visions, thus making a mistake. Moreover this study raises indirect
perspectives that a positive attitude to the problem solving only may draw our attention away from
objective obstacles to be sooner or later overcome. Research results showed that those who doubted
their abilities felt more obligated to achieve their goals. In addition, these people felt more drastic,
even aggressive and fast in making first steps. The researchers anticipate that such doubting method
is more effective for strong self-confident and motivated people able to objectively assess both
positive and negative perspectives.
Some coaches recommend imagining (visualisation) of the achievable goal.
We often do so ourselves asking questions: how does look like our goal?, How will I fill
myself after achievement? etc. However, the same process visualisation is missing. How does the
way I’ll go along towards my goal look like? Who will I meet on the way? What transitional
stations shall I pass? – these are the questions oriented to the process, not to the goal.
Pham and Taylor (1999) studied the influence of visualisation of the goal and the
process on the final result. It has been found that students who paid more attention to visualisation
of how they read and study (process) were involved in more intensive learning and got better
evaluation for performed tasks (goal). The researchers observed two main reasons determining that
the process visualisation was more effective than imagination of the final result. The first reason is
that the process visualisation leads to better concentration on intermediate tasks. The second reason
is because of the process visualisation the level of concern regarding possible unsuccessful
decreases. The stress during goal achievement could be a very strong demotivating factor. The
15 Misiukonis T. 2012. Asmeninio ugdymo praktika. Vilnius: Vaga. 16 Oettingen G., Mayer D. 2002. The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 83(5), Nov 2002, 1198-1212.
researchers provide an effective practical advice – pay most attention to planning how to reach the
goal. They recommend choosing step-by-step approach and directing much attention to the
completion of current tasks.
GROW method and goal setting. GROW method is often used for goal setting. The
conception and stages of the method are provided in the table below:
Table 4. Meanings of stages of GROW model
G
Goal
This is the end point, where the client wants to be. The goal has to be defined in such a way
that it is very clear to the client when they have achieved it.
R
Reality
The Current Reality is where the client is now. What are the issues, the challenges, how far are
they away from their goal?
O
Obstacles or
There will be Obstacles stopping the client getting from where they are now to where they
want to go. If there were no Obstacles the client would already have reached their goal.
Options Once Obstacles have been identified, the client needs to find ways of dealing with them if they
are to make progress.
W
Way Forward The Options then need to be converted into action steps which will take the client to their goal.
GROW method stages:
G – Establish the Goal
Goal setting stage has the highest impact on the overall GROW model process. Thanks to it
we decide on real actions. However, we have to think responsibly before defining the goals, because
it is quite complicated. Foreign literature often refers to the SMART goal setting method. It states
that the goal must be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-defined. Andriekienė,
Anužienė (2006) mention that the goal must be formulated and expressed in such a way that it could
be monitored and evaluated; the goal must be personified. The goal is not the things you should do
for any reason. The goal is not necessarily the majority seek.
In addition to the above-mentioned criteria, good goals must motivate and encourage
achieving them. Motivating goals are even better, because their achievement is enjoyment of the
process and emerging challenges. It sometimes happens to forget about achievement of something
important while enjoying the process, and finally, when you do not expect, the achieved goal
discovers his master.
It happens that people think about changes and get worried about their goals. Sometimes
they experience the first failure trying to reach perfect future and lose motivation, because the
dream did not come true. It is worth remembering the research of D. Goleman17
concerning the
brain influence on feelings. According to him, it is necessary to activate the left frontal lobe cortex,
because then the brain gives you a hope when you imagine the joy of goal achievement. The idea
becomes a great impulsion to ignore difficulties. Conversely, if delve into the present without
thinking about ideal life, you activate your right brain lobe letting in pessimistic thoughts that
weaken the motivation and impede success.
Questions on how to choose and develop effective, individual, and not forced environmental
goals are provided in table 5. Question formulation objective is provided next to each question.
17 Goleman D., Boyatzys R., McKee A. (2007). Lyderystė. Kaip vadovauti pasitelkiant emocinį intelektą. Kaunas:
Smaltijos leidykla
Understanding question goal is actual for better understanding of the direction and reason of
development of GROW goal stage. In addition, it provides clearer structure and benefits of
conversation management in coaching others.
Table 5. Questions contributing to development of a goal
Questions Question objective
Do I feel inspired when thinking of my goal? The best goal is the one encouraging feeling happy or smiling just
thinking of it.
Is my goal of manageable size and not so huge to
win power over me?
Setting too high goal is a self-programming to failure. If you think
that your goal is too high, try to create a sub goal, which can be
achieved within a few weeks.
Is my goal is higher than my competency?
All goals not only depend on us to some extent. However,
believing in goal accessibility, one can expect that his efforts will help to achieve it.
Did I specifically define my goal? Verbs “to identify”, “develop”, are less clear than the verbs “buy”
or “register”.
Is my goal measurable? Whether the goal is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and
time-defined.
Is my goal formulated in a positive way? It is more effective to focus on what you want than what you do not
want.
Is there a clearly defined reachable moment
when I will know that I succeed in achieving the
goal?
It is important to know that clearly defined moment when the goal
has been achieved. The moment of some goals is obvious (e.g. the
phrase “Yes, I agree” spoken during wedding ceremony), otherwise
it has to be created (e.g., “I’ll travel by airplane” when a trip is
planned).
Whether the goal is more what I want than what
I feel “I should” do? The goal works best when the person desires to achieve it.
Do I know what I lose if fail to achieve my goal? Understanding of potential losses if failed to achieve the goal can
be very motivating.
Have I considered what I lose if manage to
achieve my goal?
When changing we always loose something, therefore it is
important to understand what you will lose if you reach your goal.
What are the potential risks of achieving this goal?
There are risks associated with goal achievement. The best way is to know what the possible risks are. Then you can get ready for
them in advance.
Is this a real goal I want to reach, whether I am
keen on that it remained my dream?
Is your goal something you really want from your life? Are you
ready for success?
Do I really asked myself about what I want, or I
did not think over something?
We make decisions to the best advantage at the second attempt,
because we are influenced by the fear not to achieve what we really
want.
Whether the goal does not contradict my other
goals or objectives?
Think about how much time, money and other resources can you
spend to reach the goal. It is also worth to consider other goals that
may be donated for the goal.
Table 6. Examples of goal identification Concise examples Elaborated examples
Improve efficiency of business. To get 10 thousands Litas net profit by the end of April 2010.
Learn French. Be able to speak French and understand discussion at a business meeting on 15 May in Paris.
Emigrate to Sweden.
To find a favourite work with annual wages of 100 thousands Euro,
accommodation to live the way a like, and to become a legal resident
of Sweden by the end of September.
R – Define the Current Reality
The second stage of the GROW method is an identification of reality. If the goal is our final
stop, so the reality is where we are now. This stage aims to accurately understand the situation and
its vision. The main task is not to analyse, solve or draw conclusions, but understand the essence of
problem and determine how far we are from our goal.
The dangers at this stage lies in that we can be engaged in the network of opinions,
persuasions, obstacles or thoughts before the reality is identified. You should understand and learn
more about the problem, be able to make better decisions and choices yourself at this stage; do not
respond to the influence of surrounding persons. According to L. Pečkaitis18
, board member of
„North European Coaching Association“, in his article “In fact, each of us is an individual with his
own authentic experience, perception of reality, it is only in ourselves we can find the answers to
our questions”.
This stage should also cover all the resources that can be used for gaol achievement, even
those that does not seem useful at first glance. In addition to the most important resources, such as
equipment or money, it is worth to mention the skills, contacts, achievements and enthusiasm.
Contribution of the surrounding people that is also considered a resource should be assessed: getting
useful information or borrowing necessary tools.
Table 7. Questions contributing to identification of reality
Questions Question objective
Is my reality expressed in the same terms as the
goal?
It is important to distinguish reality from realia. Assessment of real
situation should be as objective as possible and as much as possible
without strangers’ opinion.
What are the steps I have to do to reach my goal? If you know the steps you need to take to achieve the goal, the steps
you have already done identify reality for you.
How many things have I already done? It gives valuable facts.
Did I include facts and figures? Facts and figures are the best way to express reality.
Did I include assumptions? Such questions as “how, what, when, where” are used to stay closer to facts.
How many times have I tried to achieve the goal? Inclusion of information about previous attempts to achieve this goal
and feelings – is factual information.
What happened to my previous attempts to
achieve a goal?
It is useful information that now could become success - again it is
necessary to maintain objectiveness. The phrase “I always have my
favourite chocolate at home” provides more evidence than “I have no
self-control”.
How did I behave when I experienced a failure? If you know that you are apt to punish yourself in case of failure, you
should carefully plan your actions.
Are there any opinions and beliefs in my reality? Describe the facts and avoid strong judgements.
Did I include my feelings about the current
situation? It is important to know how you feel in the current situation.
Did I include information on obstacles? Pay attention to the information about obstacles, but do not include
them in this stage.
Does my reality strongly support my factual
position, rather than hopes and fears? Do not include information that is impossible to verify.
What skills and abilities helpful in goal
achievement do I have? Accessible resources.
What kind of inter-related information or
knowledge do I have? Resources covering information and knowledge.
Do I have any skills that I could use from other areas of life?
Resources covering skills.
Did I manage to do something like this before? Past actions to achieve similar goals can help to prepare for the
“I know a number of recruitment consultants” “I personally know three recruitment consultants. I can call them and
ask for help. I know four more consultants, but they do not know me“
“I'm overweight” “My weigh is 80 kg and it is 10 kg of recommended weight”
“I do not think I will find a job ever again” “I have been looking for a job for six months, and I had only two
interviews with employers during that time”
O – Define the Obstacles
The obstacles standing on the way of goal achievement are clarified, but the ways to
overcome are not analysed at the stage. It is important to identify all the obstacles as accurately as
possible and not to get lost in labyrinths of decisions or persuasions. One may identify the obstacles
himself or involve help of others. The obstacle can affect physical environment or lack of resources.
Perhaps, identification of many obstacles may lead to fear of making next steps; therefore
the adequacy of obstacles must be assessed. Some of the obstacles are fake obstacles.
Let's analyse the following phrase “I am too old”. This abstract expression could stop us
when we will consider it relevant and accept that it can really stop us. To overcome a certain
obstacle becomes easy if we reformulate emphasizing exactness and avoiding emotions (e.g.:
“you're not too old”). In the development of the example you should consider that you are let's say
55 years, you have valuable experience to share. Some managers feel uncomfortable because their
subordinates are their parents’ age. The following note can be emphasised: age can make job search
more complicated. Finding a job is becoming more difficult, but still possible.
Table 9. Questions contributing to clarification of obstacles
Questions Question objective
What stops me reach the goal? The obstacle is what hinders achievement of the goal.
How do I know that exactly these things prevent
my ability to reach the goal?
Sometimes what we perceive as an obstacle, not what is really
stopping us. The obstacles can be identified by the following three
criteria:
Important problem
No ways to escape the problem
It is not clear how it impedes achieving the goal.
What else can stop me (solving complex
problems, there are usually a lot more obstacles)?
It is important to keep asking this question until you feel that you
found all of the real obstacles.
Obstacle – Me
How do I have to change personally to reach my
goal?
Usually, there are personal obstacles that hinder achievement of the
goal.
What stops me to change? This question gives more information about what is a real obstacle.
How much self-confidence do I have to achieve
the goal?
It is important to know real cause of lack of self-confidence,
affecting goal achievement.
What are the possible risks or dangers I will
encounter, if I refuse to achieve the goal?
Not clarified dangers and their decisions in our minds will be
unclear, vague and triggering fears. It is much easier to plan
overcoming the risks when you know them.
Are the dangers real, or is it just an excuse for
being inactive? It is very important to be honest with yourself in terms of risk reality.
Do I do anything, directly or indirectly, in order to
keep the situation? This issue explains our role keeping beside the obstacle.
Do I have any expectations of how to achieve this
goal?
Such expectations as “have to” manage the situation can create
additional obstacles.
Do I process the current situation or the past one? Sometimes we do not see the current situation we deal with, because we remember the ones happened in the past.
Obstacle – others
Do other people are a part of the obstacle? How
exactly do they stop me?
An attitude or behaviour of other people often makes it harder to
achieve the goal.
What prevents others from cooperation with me? It is important to understand the reason why other people do not
cooperate.
What is the consistency of reasons of non-
cooperation?
Sometimes we think we know the reason, but it is not a real reason.
You may need to check it.
Obstacle - environment
Do I have the right physical environment to
achieve the goal?
Simple things such as bad organisation of environment can be an
obstacle.
What do I need to change in the environment in
order to reach the goal?
Finding out the things to be changed is mainly realisation of
changing.
What else? This question encourages thinking continentally.
Obstacle - resources
What resources do I need, but do not have by
now?
It may be time, money, support or knowledge. It is important to
consider carefully.
What skills and abilities do I need to achieve my
goal?
Sometimes the goal requires particular skills or abilities, which we do
not have at the moment.
Table 9. Examples of identification of obstacles
Concise examples Elaborated examples
“My work planning is hopeless”
“I cannot solve and classify received messages lying on my table for
three months already. Also is became difficult to find wanted object
on the table”
“I’m not motivated”
“I often stay in bed up to 10 hours in the morning in order not to
prolong the time before lunch, I’m watching TV. If I have to do
something important, I wait until the very last minute“
O – Explore the options to overcome the Obstacles
When all the obstacles are identified, it is necessary to make a list of possible problem
solutions and get closer to the goal. Some of the solutions are fulfilled when many of the obstacles
are overcome at the same time, others – can quickly lead to a dead end. It is advisable not to reject
ideas too quickly just because they look distant or create additional obstacles. Sometimes these
additional obstacles may be very useful.
It is relevant to use all possible sources that come to your mind, not to limit seeking of
information in traditional sources only at this stage of the method implementation. According to
suggestion of B. Griffiths, a great way to force you to think from a different perspective is to
imagine how other (different race, gender, ethnicity or religion) person would do. He recommends
considering the possibility of asking famous people for advice. What would Gandhi, Churchill, or
Donald Trump advice? You can ask anyone, whether he is alive or not, real or fictional. And it does
not matter that you really do not know what answer they will give you (it is a guess), the aim is to
look from new viewpoint.
In order to find the ways to deal with obstacles it is recommended to adapt the questions
below or their parts to each identified obstacle (by necessity).
Table 10. Questions contributing to finding possible options to overcome the obstacles Questions Question objective
What would be my first step to overcome this
obstacle? The first step is often all you need.
What is the simplest solution? Sometimes the simplest solutions are the best solutions.
Enlargement of mind
If I did not face an obstacle how would I behave? These questions help to free the mind and make solutions more
creative . If I had a magic wand what would I do to
overcome the obstacle?
What is the perfect solution?
Lack of resources
How can I create what I need? Often the resources are available, but we do not recognize them until
clearly asking ourselves about the issue.
Who could lend me what I need? This question helps to create options when other people can help us.
How else could I get this? Could I offer
something in return?
Mostly the options are related to cooperation not to payment for
service.
Who I can give me an information or knowledge I
need?
Very often there are people who could help us if we would dare to
ask them.
How do I acquire the skills that I need? Good actual question.
How can I find a free time which I need? This question is not valuable if you are sure you do not have the time
you need.
Efforts and challenges
Have I ever solved something similar in the past?
What did I do then?
We could remember the skills and knowledge used to solve past
situations and apply them to the current situation.
What have I already done to come closer to the
goal?
Often there are some factors that resolve in the process. If we are
able to recognize them we can use them, or even more to achieve
with them.
Are there any experienced and tested ways of how
I could overcome the obstacles? How could I find
this out?
Our mind often focuses on one way of solving the problem. This
question stimulates us to consider other ways to overcome the
obstacles.
Involvement of others
Is there anyone else who could overcome this
obstacle? How would he do it?
We can use the information about how other people would deal with
this situation, which quite complicated for us. Creation of new opportunities is performed without asking or directly involving other
people to the process, but thinking about such alternatives.
Are there any other people who would be willing
to help me? Many people are apt to “act alone” not involving external assistance.
What mistakes made by others did I notice? How
can I avoid these mistakes?
This question leads to think one step ahead and avoid potential
obstacles.
Me
What does really motivate me? If really motivating solutions are created, it is more likely they will
be implemented.
What will I gain by changing approach? Sometimes we limit ourselves by thinking about our chosen options
of solutions.
What would I do if I were more drastic and less
drastic? Decisiveness helps to create more potential options.
What would be a real risk that I would be willing
to accept?
It can be very interesting and motivated to cooperate with the risk in
order to avoid it.
What would be the real danger which I do not like
to happen?
The knowledge of the decisions we do not want to accept is also very
useful.
How could I change my reaction to a situation or a person to get a different result?
Since we usually are a part of the problem, changing our responses may be very helpful in developing options of solutions.
What rules do I refer to? Am I sure if they are
right?
It may be the rules created by ourselves, other people or institutions.
It is necessary to make sure they are real and truthful.
How could I deal with this obstacle applying
other unusual approach?
Thinking about how to change our normal thinking pattern may
distinguish other options.
Quantity and quality
Do I have enough options to move forward? When options are set, you should check whether it is now possible to
push the other identified obstacles.
Do I have to solve this obstacle to the end, or I
can just avoid negative consequences? It is not always necessary to solve the problem to the end. Another
way providing enough of what we want may occur. What would be the partial/ temporary solution
that would be relevant at the moment?
Table 11. Examples of overcoming the obstacles Concise examples Elaborated examples
“I could ask for help some people” “I could ask Jonas or Antanas to explain me how the program
operates”
„I will try to behave other way” “Next time when Antanas will be persuading me to overwork I will
be ready to suggest alternatives instead of acceptance of the advice”
“I will move to projects during the nearest few
weeks”
“I will draw personal motivation plan with certain stages and reward
for implementation of each stage in order to finish the project
delayed for quite a long time. I will ask Jonas and Antanas to meet
me every week for help”
“I will overcome financial difficulties” “I will review all the last financial difficulties, define what have I
done to solve these difficulties and apply these principles once again“
W – Establish the Will
The last stage of the GROW model is to determine the plan of future actions. This stage is
different because we used to choose sequences of actions and combinations of options to reach the
goal at the earlier stages, and here actions must be specific with established date and clearly
demonstrating how to get to the goal.
Sometimes you may need to explore actions before making your final decision. You can re-
use the GROW model to overcome new obstacle and improve your plan. If the plan is detailed, it
will become a consistent diagram of achieving intermediate goals or measures.
Each of the solutions is adapted following questions or parts.
The questions below or their parts are applied for each selected solution option.
Table 12. Questions contributing to creation of a plan of future actions
Questions Question objective
What is the first step I should do?
It is important to convert solution methods into actions. These actions
must be fulfilled during one to three weeks. In case it is difficult to
make actions to be implemented during this period of time it is worth
trying to split and implement faster.
How could I anticipate the second step I should
do? The first step often defines the second one.
Do I need:
Establish a contact?
Acquire new skills?
Acquire knowledge?
Take actions to change the template?
Take actions to remind myself the goal
and process?
Do something that requires a physical
power?
Finish something?
Ask anyone?
Propose something?
These items are the list of control actions.
What is the last step I should do? How could I
achieve my goal moving in backward direction from the last step to the first one?
It sometimes possible to move backwards from the last step to the first one in case you know the last possible step.
Comprehensiveness
Are my further actions realistic? If you do not feel that the actions are realistic it will be difficult to
accept obligations.
Did I consider all possibilities that may be useful? It is important to be sure that all the options have been considered.
What would be drastic and ambitious actions? Drastic actions can often push forward fasten than common ones.
What would be creative activity? Discovering creative activity may often turn established models
upside down.
How could I take actions solving my major
problem?
Pushing forward when solving particularly complicated problem
gives much energy.
Have I considered the ways to maintain
motivation?
Loss of motivation is a frequent reason of failing to reach the goal for
the majority. Therefore it is necessary to plan how to maintain the
motivation.
Support
Who will be willing to give me support? How and
when could I get this support? Support is the main factor for goal achievement. Be sure, you will
have enough support. Where is the first place I would turn to for help?
Where is the last place I would turn to for help? Sometimes the people whom we do not ask to help could give us
significant support.
Consequences
Who will be affected by my actions at most? Do I
need to notify them?
Thoughts about activity through consequences may enhance success
possibilities.
How should I manage with undesirable response
from other people?
Self-confidence is enhanced when knowing how to deal with
undesirable responses.
Obligations
(Evaluate according to 1 to 10 scale where 10 is
“completely sure”), To what extent am I sure that
I will complete all actions? (If lower than 10) Do
I have to check the task and time to get more
confidence?
To be honest with yourself regarding the readiness to act allows
enhance obligations level by plan.
Do I have anything that would help me to accomplish the steps? If yes, how could I get it?
It is an inspection of the last efforts that may disappoint. What will you then do with them?
Completion
What is the certain date for each step of actions? All the further actions must be dated.
Are my further actions specified, measurable,
achievable, relevant, and time-defined? The same criteria used for goal setting are invoked.
Am I sure that my further actions will allow
achieving my general goal? This question reminds the direction for actions.
How will I celebrate my achievement? The celebration of achievement is a very powerful motivating factor!
Table 13. Example of identification of further actions
Concise examples Elaborated examples
“I will ask Marius to give me a break” “I will speak to Marius and ask him to give me five day unpaid leave
by Tuesday”
“Improve French” “I will register for evening classes of French to get spoken language
fundamentals within three months”.
“Call a few people and ask for help” “I will call Edvard, Joana and Laura next week to ask if they are
ready to introduce me to the director“
Summary. The GROW method is not only a tool for achievement of goals, but also a
problem-solving tool. It is relevant to solving both business and personal problems. It works
anywhere you need to achieve goals or overcome obstacles standing on the way. The GROW model
can be applied in solving own problems and problems of other people, as well as in group work
where the members share common goal or problem.
Japanese Kaizen method. Every coach or andragogist playing his role and making an effort to help
others to clarify, define and achieve their goals can apply various techniques. It depends on their
creativity, ability to choose the most appropriate way of their intervention echoing client’s need for
help in its best way.
Japanese Kaizen method or principle is applied in personal or professional improvement.
KAI: change ZEN: for the better
Kaizen principle – continuous improvement
Kaizen basis – a tiny but everyday change
These interrelated pictograms mean continuous (everyday) improvement. Kaizen may
mean and continuous changes for the better till the second stage of improvement. Kaizen peculiarity
– it may be used by anyone. Kaizen is based on not drastic, but every day, tiny and continuous
changes towards continuous improvement. It is a contrary to western conception of brutal reform,
when everything is left and “started from nothing”. According to Kaizen conception, nothing should
be left and nothing should be started from nothing, but one should search how to improve various
activity processes (organization or individual) where and to what extent it is possible applying 5 S
principle:
SEIKETSU (Standardizing);
SEISO (Cleaning);
SEITON (Ordering/Arrangement);
SEIRI (Sorting)
SHITSUKE (Disciplining).
Kaizen may be applied in everyday people’s activity, learning, production, company,
institution, family etc.. To improve personally and professionally Kaizen suggests an original style
of management based on “healthy mind” logics. Kaizen is first of all a philosophy requiring
continuous development as a compulsory transmission to progress. Kaizen may change the life of
an individual in revolutionary and positive way.
Why is Kaizen method effective? All the changes even positive changes raise concerns.
Human brains seem to be programmed to stand against changes. In case of fear, concerns it suggests
the only alternative: run away or fight, resist. In Kaizen method human brains are as if fooled
because very small changes are not very noticeable, therefore an automatic programme “Danger,
changes!” does not work.
“Japanese Kaizen method is characterized by small actions leading to achievement of big goals,
because human being does not lose the courage to change” (Bill Marchesin).
Everyday small actions and initiative do not require big efforts from a person, but such
activity may last month by month. Man day by day sees small but stable outcomes leading to the
established goal. The main Kaizen rules:
1. Ask yourself a lot of questions about the problem. Confine yourself from fears while analysing
the problem. Stimulate your creativity in order to solve the problem.
2. Establish the goal and split it into small elements.
3. All the time, even in case of threatening crisis, solve small problems achieving your final goal.
Examples of application of Kaizen method:
1. You are dreaming of writing a 360 pages book. Yes...but how to do it? How to write such a big book? According to
Kaizen method, you should write one page per day, and it is completely possible.
2. You decided always to keep your working place tidy. To begin with try to put on pencil caps every day after work.
Do it to form a habit. Then every time try to orderly put all you writing after the work. When is become a habit, move
over to documents on your working table. First of all, sort some of the documents, then a file, then another etc. You will
be surprised by order in your office after some months.
And now say how and in what area do you personally could apply KAIZEN?
When summarizing it is possible to state that after andragogists have acquired coaching
knowledge, skills, abilities and various coaching techniques, they have the opportunity to apply
coaching in their activity as a major support/help tool for adult learners.
Self-control questions:
1. What risk could the coaching specialist face, if he would “chase” client’s goals, hurry
“helping” the client to achieve his goals?
2. How to explain the concept of goal visualisation?
3. What should a man do in case he does not have volatile fantasy and is asked to visualise
(imagine) his goal during coaching?
4. Why did the author decide to draw this picture? What is off screen?
5. Have you ever applied GROW methodology in practice? If so, please provide a specific
example.
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: how to set
appropriate coaching goals?
PRACTICAL TASKS 1 (see Appendix 4):
2.4. Ability to Listen to and ask Questions The main question of the theme is – what are the main abilities of coach and how are they
expressed?
The main ability of coach – ability to listen. Very often certain communication obstructions –
“viruses” make it difficult to listen, but there are means of destruction of communication “viruses”:
Table 14. Elimination of communication obstructions with the help of questions
“Virus” Symptoms “Virus” destruction mean - questions
Inaccurate facts
Unclear, not definite actions,
What exactly do you want to tell me? Who? What /How?
Where?, When? Who with? With whose help?
story, context
Interpretations of said
words
Assumptions,
suspicions,
hypotheses, conclusions,
generalizations
Causality: how X depends on Y ? Who did say (prove) you
that?
Equivalence: X is one thing, and Y - another. How does X prove Y ?
Thought analysis : What did you refer to saying so….? How do
you know exactly?
Critical assessment
It is good, it is bad,
it is important, and
it is likely that,
unlikely that…
What was your statement based on?
Doubtful norms, rules
Must, do not must,
ought to, do not
ought to…
What does stop us? What would have happened, if we behaved
like that? (Determination of doubtful reason).
What would have happened, if we did not do so?
Generalizations
Always, never,
nobody, all are the
same...
Always? Never? All?
Request to provide opposite example
Explanatory conversation and focused listening – active processes of
communication. They require participation, response and sociability. Sometime there is a need to
participate in conversation because the main method of coaching is a conversation, sometimes to
listen.
The aim of explanatory conversation as a specific coaching method – to express in
words the activity performed by man. Therefore this conversation is interesting in order it gives the
individual a possibility to reveal thing he does not notice, see or perceive. The conversations help
the client to retrieve self-confidence, reveal his internal powers and resources he did not know about
before. The explanatory conversation is based on P. Vermerscho papers (2003). For example, well
performed activity task is verbally transmitted during the conversation. Activity concept is not
limited to only material actions, but also covers thinking. Discussion:
What do you say when you do not understand what others say to you? What do you do when you want the speaker to
rephrase? How do you understand that you perceived the information the way the speaker wanted you to perceive?
What do you do when you want the speaker to confirm your perceiving is right?
The coach tries to help the client to understand his simplified knowledge, skills during the
explanatory conversation, and it may be a secret key to professional improvement and application
of practical learning situation. The understanding comes with words, speaking, expressing
simplified knowledge. This is the aim of the explanatory conversation. It is possible to learn the
techniques of conversation, but some difficulties may occur:
To explain your activity in simple words is not so easy how it might seem. Here a new
statement and approach are necessary. Formulation of new statement, approach is not an
easy thing, therefore the main function of the coaching specialist is to help the client at this
stage;
To receive simplified information is not so easy how it is told about procedural knowledge.
The subject has procedural knowledge, the fact is proven by practical activity, but this
knowledge is not conceptualised, not expressed (not verbalize), therefore it can be stated
that it is beyond our mind. This knowledge is indirectly proven by client’s statement “I
knew, but could not say it”;
The help offered by tutors, mentors seeking to conceptualise procedural knowledge is often
ineffective compared to applied direct conversation methods. However, the coach must
know the methods of indirect conversation.
The explanatory conversation is not a conversation of the highest level. It has
distinctive objectives, techniques and their systemic structural access. Thus, the explanatory
conversation allows verbalising (saying): specific action, the thing that has been done for sure;
perceive action elements, comprehend the contents of non-effective/effective action; enhance
thinking efficiency of acting subject; enhance autonomy level of the subject.
Summarizing the ideas of many coaches in practice, it may be stated that very often
client do not really know what they know. Therefore they think they are not competent because they
have not ever analysed nor their experience, nor ways of activity. The whole process of explanatory
conversation is divided into the following stages:
• I can, I know;
• this is this;
• proof;
• return;
• learning.
The coach avoid “why?” questions during the explanatory conversation, because such
questions enforce the client to find reasons, and the aim of conversation is to reveal to the client the
things he does not see, recognize, perceive. General questions, questions with several possible
answers or requiring providing an attitude are also avoided.
Sometimes all you need during the conversation is to listen.
Discussion:
How do you know that anyone is actively listening to you? What do you do when you are listening actively? How does
look like actively listening person?
A very important thing is listener’s optimism. Optimistically-minded listening people
help to orient thoughts from self-compassion to more important and beautiful things as well as to
find the way out when it seems all the doors got closed (Mažutytė, 2009). The same author
distinguishes several types of active listening: optimistic, patient, sequential, good-natured,
sensitive etc. It is natural that at the worse moment of life we do forget how brave, happy, resistant
we are, thus, what a success to have listener-optimist at such moments of life. Maybe the majority
notices how difficult is it to get rid of personal thought and mood during the conversation with other
people. Many people instead of focused listening once in their life thought about the answer and
how would they felt in such situation, or he (she) is talking a “trash”. It is necessary to listen to
other person attentively trying to forget about yourself and your opinion. Even in conversation with
closest relatives we do not express our true feelings. We always keep something quiet, leave
unexpressed thoughts between words, that we do not dare to say or do not know how to say. The
coach must try to hear the unsaid, because the majority like to communicate with people who can
openly say: “I know your feelings, desires and dreams”.
Patience determines the ability to listen during conversation. There is no true listening
without the patience and no conversation without the listening. We often really do not have time to
listen to somebody. However, in such cases we should be open-hearted and not to lie saying we
have time to speak and even want to.
Patient listening during conversation means that: conversation partner is allowed to say
and he will not be interrupted by “I know what you want to say”; you are allowed to speak after two
or three seconds of silence (Masalskienė, 2008). Big and often poorly assessed danger aims at
selection of what we want to hear to be happy and what conforms to listener’s opinion.
Firstly, the sequential listening is an focused listening even when heard statements are
not pleasing and do not correspond to listener’s opinion; the listener must think about the things he
have heard, not to prepare his speech in his mind; actually to track the thought of conversation
partner and try as soon as possible to understand the structure of the language and goals; to
comprehend not only the spoken words, but also secondary features, posture, gesticulation, gesture,
voice timbre and speaking rate what helps to create general impression (Mažutytė, 2009). Discussion:
Why do not we listen to sometimes? What could be the internal reasons of not listening? External reasons of not
listening? Are there listening styles? Is the influence of status and gender to listening expressed?
We usually got used to listen with criticism and analyse in order to, for example, pay
conversation partner’s attention to unclearly formulated questions or to dishonourable
argumentation. In the course of good-natured listening: I am not only listening what is said, but also
understand what my conversation partner has in his mind in fact; I am simply listening without
trying to make fast and early decisions and conclusions; I try to feel into matters and understand the
causes of concern (Mažutytė, 2009).
Sensitive listening is a type of listening when we give signals (acceptance signs) to
conversation partner and express involvement in his statements and internal readiness to “accept”
them. Those conversation partners who feel constrained, in particular, are very grateful for the
friendly smile, affirmative nodding or other verbal encouragement such as: your experience will
help me to assess situation; I did not consider the problem from the aspect; could you please give an
example of your statement from everyday job? If we feel that it is obviously difficult for our
conversation partner to discuss any subject, in appropriate circumstances, we may directly ask:
would you like to take an occasion to talk about your concerns? I perfectly understand that you find
it difficult to talk about your problems now and here.
Some authors (Lenhardt, 2002; Grant, Spence, 2010 et al.) distinguish the following
strategies of listening: willingness to active listening; observance of listening objective; distinctions
of the information.
The following technique for development of active listening skills is suggested (Amar,
Angel, 2006):
clarify. Ask if something is not clear. This will give you more information and allow
demonstrating your interest and concern. “Tell me about it”. “Can you give examples?”
Some people are afraid of questions, so please be gentle, give support. Be careful with
“why” questions. Instead of “Why do you want to take coaching courses?” ask “Do you
want to learn something special?”
generalize things you heard from a person to check if you understood correctly.
hear the feelings. Let the person feel that you hear emotional content.
look deeper. What does the person feel, but do not say?
be empathetic “If I experienced that, I would feel certainly sad”.
learn to be determined. Politely but insistently defend your persuasions.
express your thoughts and feelings, express needs and desires.
There is no moment without connection during the conversation. Even when we listen
to (or sometimes do not listen) we consciously or more often unconsciously regularly influence our
conversation partner (Amar, Angel, 2006).
Self-control questions:
1. What makes the communication difficult in terms of focused listening?
2. What are the main features of explanatory conversation, main coach?
3. What are the strategies of active listening?
4. How could be the listening improved?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: what are the main abilities of
the coach and how are they expressed?
2.5. Conversation Management and Question Formulation Technique
The main question of the theme is – how to formulate appropriate questions in
coaching?
Managing the conversation the impact of question is decisive (Grant et al., 2009).
When asking you always to wait for answer and find out the essence of matter at the same time.
Questions stimulate provision of information, expression of attitude, whether to be against or
explain certain nuances. However, we know from our experience that questions can have another
impact under certain circumstances. The questions often invoke certain, but not always predictable,
reaction. For example, unreflective questions could disturb, provoke or even hurt the conversation
partner. There are questions extending conversation topic and sharply interrupting it. Questions may
help to satisfy curiosity, compromise the conversation partner or express true sympathy and trust
(Duijts et al., 2008). If the questions remain unanswered or partly answered in the course of
conversation, often the reason is not unwillingness of partner, but unclear formulation of the
question.
Types of questions (Agarwal et al., 2009):
Multiple meaning and complex questions are characterized by clear “deterrence” feature.
Usually short and clear answers are given to short and clear questions.
Not only answers, but also questions are the result of thinking. Often the questions trigger
hardly defined disagreeable feeling of general nature that shortly and easily transmits to our
tone, speech rhythm, manner, loudness etc. Breathing, frequent, slow, normal, changes in breathing
are also powerful indicators of nonverbal information.
microbehaviour indicators: includes facial expression elements, movements of
muscles (lower jaw, blinking, gathering of brows); position of lips (slightly opened, bitten lip);
grimace; colour of under lip, tonus, size, face colour (appeared spots of different colour, redness,
pallor).
Application of calibration technique is beneficial because it provides a lot of information
in the area of nonverbal communication, thus, helping to understand and notice some changes of
indicators in the course of conversation. Another information collection technique is applied in the
course of verbal communication.
Meta-model of information collection. Communication is an exchange of information. However,
the language is not only the source of misunderstanding of communication, but also of
interpretation or even confusion. Thoughts must be clearly expressed in order to understand
conversation partner and to be understood.
Bandler and Grinder have created a method designed for language accuracy called meta-
model of language. The latter helps to collect information about peculiarities of verbal
communication with the help of questions. This method is used in cases when an attempt to avoid
misunderstanding in communication is made. The model is provided in the form of tables according
to three categories (generalization, omission/emission, distortion (misrepresentation). Examples and
questions of each category are provided in meta-model. These examples and questions can be
modelled in every case taking into account certain situation, because of different meaning
depending on the situation.
Table 15. Generalization
Linguistic term Examples Questions Preferred effect
General quantifiers Everything, always, never,
nobody, everyone.
Nothing is wrong, everything
is not so
Nobody works here
To repeat the term making
and accent: everything?
Nobody works? Does really
nobody work? Is it true, all
that nobody works?
To explicate the
generalization.
To find opposite examples.
Usual sense
Rules
Provisions
So there you go.....
Such behaviour is bad
Such behaviour is honest
Is it Your opinion?
Who does state so?
What is the case of
application? What is the object of
application?
How do You know it?
To recover meaning,
Origin of rules and
provisions
Modals
1.in terms of necessity
2.in terms of
possibility
Ought to...
I need...
It is impossible...
I cannot do something
What if...?
What stops You?
And if You would try?
To find out and reveal
results, reasons,
consequences or obstacles
3.In terms of
normalization
A process transformed into suspended
(“dead”) matter
Here the communication is
bad.
Why is it bad?
In regard to whom is it bad?
From whose viewpoint is it bad?
To reveal process specific
features, clarify the object
Table 16. Omission/emission
Linguistic term Examples Questions Preferred effect
Simple omission/emission I do not agree
I am not satisfied
With whom? With what? In
what?
To find what is omitted
(e.g.: complement)
Omission of content
references
I don’t care
It doesn't matter.
I don’t know
About what exactly?
What doesn’t matter?
What exactly?
To recover references of
contents (reveal the subject
or complement)
Omission of comparison
element
It is better to leave
He is better
This is more expensive
Than what?
Than who?
Than what?
Compared to whom?
To find comparison
elements and recover
Not specific verbs He begged me
I used his advice
He won
How?
How?
How exactly?
To clarify verbs
Distortion
(misrepresentation)
Reason-result (x determines
y)
He makes me upset
He discourages me (If x,
than y)
Why does he make you
upset?
How exactly does he
discourage You?
Who discourages you to say so?
To ruin reason-result.
To find opposite example
Complex equivalence (x
proves y)
He never greets me, he
hates me
Why does the fact of not
greeting You prove that he
hates You?
If she smiled, would she be
satisfied?
Have You ever blamed and
thereby hated someone?
To recover equivalence.
To find opposite example
Reading thoughts (subject
thinks he is able to do it)
I know what he wanted to
say
He does so, because... He doesn’t like me
Where do You know from?
Why do you state so?
Who discourages you to say so?
To find and recover the
origin of information
NLP may be applied for anticipation of goals. NLP provides five goal anticipation and
formulation criteria.
1. The goal must be formulated in positive mood. The first question to establish the goal must
be “What do you want? Wish?”. The answer gives a possibility to check if the goal is
positively formulated. Actually, some people answer “I do not want x subject any more” and
so speak about the thing they do not want and not about they wish or want. Therefore, it is
very important to express the goal by positive statement, because our brains do not have
negative representation. Negation exists in speech only. If it is said “Do not think about red
sports car”, the first imagination will be exactly the red sports car.
2. Specific context. It is essential to determine certain context of goals. A question “What do
you really want? Wish?” is formulated for the reason. If we aim at holidays, we must exactly
know the context: where will we spend our holidays, when, in hat season, how much time,
who with? Thus, in order to explore the certain specific context, it would be valuable to
formulate questions of different nature contributing to concretize the goal. Non-specific goal
makes the person confused.
3. Realisation of goals must be controlled. The following questions are actual: “How will you
know (understand) that you reached your goal?” or “What will be your facts of goal
achievement?”. In terms of sensory the same questions would sound like this: “What will
you say, hear, feel at that moment?”.
4. The goal must be realistic. It is essential that the goal belonged to a person. The person must
decide to achieve the goal. Often people express their wishes, desires as if they were their
goal. “I want surrounding people to treat me kindly”. It is only positive purpose or intention,
but what can the person do himself in order to achieve the goal – that is the question that
needs immediate answer. Instead of asking surrounding people for kind treatment, it would
be beneficial to formulate the following goal: “I want to maintain good relations with
surrounding people”.
5. Ecological goal. Ecology is a part of environmental science. NLP distinguishes internal and
external environment. Internal ecology aims at professional, family, social environment of a
person. Internal ecology aims at different personal values, beliefs, provisions, attitudes,
criteria, feelings etc. Discussion:
What does “human ecology” mean today in terms of communication?
The questions ”what will happen, when the goal is achieved?” will force the person to thing
about change consequences, realisations, envisaged goal. The consequences may be very positive;
in this case personal motivation to achieve the goal is intensified. However, negative consequences
are not excluded. Such consequences must be thought over a priori, because they may have negative
influence on the person who achieves the goal.
NLP positive features and weaknesses. First of all, NLP involves effective methods,
technique, but not a territory. NLP today is applied both in personal and professional development.
In the area of personal development NLP allows the person developing his personal sources,
improving and changing himself. Most people decide to learn NLP in order to personally develop.
In professional area NLP methods are applied in sport (training, team formation, efficiency
achievement etc.). NLP methods are also applied in pedagogy and andragogy. Here they help to
develop abilities for learning. NLP technique is applied in therapy, consulting, advising etc.
NLP in the area of Continuing Vocational Education (CVE) is the first tool for training at
workplace. Discussion:
There is/there is no sales or management NLP, specific methods van be applied is sales or management area? There
is/there is no continuous professional development NLP, there are NLP tools applied to workers CVE? NLP is/is not an
additional or specific worker learning tool in CVE learning?
Specific NLP tools, approaches, methods are applied in adult education together with usual
tools and methods. Therefore, more effective competence change could be achieved by virtue of
application of NLP tools in worker learning.
One of NLP critics aims at the possibility to influence or manipulate people by the means of
NLP tools. Actually, the greatest communication paradox is that it is impossible for people not to
communicate. It is impossible not to influence other person in the course of communication. What
is said is intended for conversation partner in order to transmit information, but at the same time an
intention is made to impact the partner. Thus, one can stimulate partner’s anger, hate or vice versa –
provoke or don’t provoke partner’s interest. The question does not decide if we do influence other
person during conversation, but to analyse how to positively influence other people using NLP
tools? NLP distinguishes the terms “manipulation” from “management”. One is accompanied or
invited towards defined goal, while all manipulators are hiding their goals. Certainly, manipulator
could learn NLP tools and methods.
NLP weakness. NLP tools and methods seem to be too simple. Therefore, an illusion that
beginner knows everything may appear. Actually, to manage NLP tools and methods in an
advantageous and effective way, the provisions on new (preferred) behaviour must be changed.
Discussion with an author:
“World perception map of every person influences his life and abilities to achieve success in certain area a lot. John
Grinder and Richard Bandler, in their studies of people who reached great results, selected and systemized personal
features contributing to achievement of desired goals. By creating some sort of world perception map of surrogate
genius. It takes a very long time and accordingly is costly trying to change the traditional ways of human self-
consciousness (psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, life experience). Therefore, NLP creators watching the most effective
psychotherapists and hypnosis specialists have selected the most efficient methods and created the techniques of
destruction of self-consciousness confinement and consciousness “reprogramming” (changing the map) applying it to
easily reprogram their clients into genius” (V. Masalskis)
Your comments and arguments.
To summarize it can be stated that the most significant change is often the change of
our attitude, but not the changes of external world. Our usual perception of the world may be
changed at once. Thus, the aim of neurolinguistic programming is not a change of people and their
minds, but to help them to understand why they are the way they are. Such understanding is equated
with a consolation prize, therefore changes according to S.F. Duijts et al. (2008) are based on
propulsion.
Self-control questions:
1. Why NLP in communication would be considered not only as a technique, but also as a
specific attitude?
2. What is the thesis “Everyone says and does, what they think and feel” doubtful, quite in
some cases?
3. What is the necessity of synchronization of verbal, paraverbal and nonverbal
communication?
4. What does “calibration” in terms of NLP mean?
5. Where and when can the andragogist apply NLP technique and tools?
TASKS 3 - GAMES “Mafia” (see Appendix 4)
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: how is NLP understood and
when is it applied?
2.7. Demonstration of Positive Recognition Signs The main question of the theme is: is it necessary to say or demonstrate the person if you
agree with him? Is it necessary to say what is good? bad? How to say these things?
Signs of acceptance. E. Berne used English term “strake” meaning stroke, petting and
stubbornness. So called acceptance signs constitute the object of transactional analysis (TA).
Transaction is verbal (wordy) or behavioural (nonverbal) interaction between two people or
transaction is a unit of communication. Transactional analysis constitutes a part of social
psychology. In 1970, TA was developed by E. Berne. During the last decades the theory has
expanded: it is applied in psychotherapy, education, covers interrelations, management, personality,
his relations and behaviour.
E. Berne’s theory and practice was focused on communication pathology determined by
psychological games. The author provided general principles of transactional analysis, revealed the
mechanics of faulty “games” leading to emotional damage of personality in his book published in
Lithuanian19
. According to E. Berne, human games are models of ritual transaction or interpersonal
behaviour that could be a reference to hidden feelings or emotions. Thus, transactionists along with
psychoanalytics in the course of game analysis return to past events, pay mush attention to the
structure of personality, however, their reference point – interpersonal relations (Gailienė, 1998).
Transactional analysis opened new opportunities to experience the person interacting with others. E.
Berne and his followers unambiguously state that for the person it is essential to be noticed,
19 Berne E. 2008. Žaidimai, kuriuos žaidžia žmonės: žmogiškųjų santykių psichologija.
“stroked”, recognized. Exchange of signs of recognition, strokes, creates the transaction. The person
receiving recognition signs – stimulations (by words, or information given by actions, gesture,
mimics or sight), at best loose emotional balance. In other cases, it could be reason for sufferings,
psychological disorders (Almonaitienė, 2004). It is possible to analyse communication as exchanges
of certain type, when we transmit information from one to another, and treat the transaction itself as
communication unit (Karpman, 2008). Discussion:
The acceptance (recognition) sign can be positive, negative, behavioural, objective or personal. What are these
recognition signs?:
I like/do not like your report.
I like/do not like the way you eat.
I like/do not like your voice tone.
I like/do not like your clothes
A person wishes to be noticed, recognized by others. Positive recognition signs are
expressed not only in words, but also by smiling, applause etc., negative – by cold glance,
disapproval, critics, knit eyebrows etc. However, negative recognition signs are better than lack of
any signs.
Structuring time in communication refers to the intensity of acceptance signs in terms
of time (Longin, 2006). The person feels uncomfortable in silence, i.e. during non-structural
moment of time. The need to plan the time expresses the need of person to avoid boredom. E.
Berne described 6 time structuring elements (transactions). They were classified according to
quantitative/qualitative features in terms of acceptance signs, from the weakest to the strongest
(Longin, 2006):
withdrawal: the person escapes physically or psychologically;
ritual: common, standardized encoded social relationship (e.g.: greeting style). Rituals
are the most secure form of transaction based on stereotype communication formed by
culture. There is no need to exchange big amounts of information between participating
people in such transaction; Task:
Provide certain examples of transactions from funeral and wedding rituals.
leisure: characterize the conversation according to stereotype characters (e.g.: talkee
talkee, business conversation). It is not binding and half ritual communication. It is
communication between people with similar hobby (e.g.: golf, pocker). Such
communication makes it possible to structure the time and avoid incidents that might
cause to much emotions; Discussion:
Try to establish the transaction between you and fellow-traveller in the airplane flying to USA (in terms of structuring
time). What recognition signs did you used? What recognition signs did you receive?
activity: refers to elements with objectives: to do something, take actions. Transactions
with other people are not necessary during activity structuring time (e.g.: preparations
for examinations, project preparation etc.). Sometimes people take actions in order to
avoid transaction. In other words, important for people acceptance signs are often
received and sent in activity when specking about professional activity or professional
recognition etc., Discussion:
What acceptance sign can be watched during lectures in teacher-student transaction?
What type of acceptance can be watched?
What is the type of most often transaction?
games: make possible exchange of intensive, but negative recognition signs. Game is a
tricky transaction. During the game people are wittingly or instinctively using hidden
schemes to achieve hidden goal. Games have their rules, players, predictable end. It is
an exchange of hidden transactions aimed at verification of solution of life scenario.
Game gives certain benefits, but usually causes negative emotions to all the players.
One person starts the game choosing the role in a dramatic triangle. Then different roles
appear in the triangle: victim, persecutor and rescuer;
intimacy: corresponds to open communication based on trust, respect and acceptance of
other person; gives possibility to exchange positive recognition signs of high quality
and intensity. However, sometimes intimacy transaction may be dangerous. These
transactions not structures in terms of time are usually avoided and changed to
structured and secure one;
As it was mentioned, the recognition signs can be positive and negative intended to products
(services) and person (Berne, 2006). Positive recognition signs make the communication and trust
between people stronger (table 17).
Table17
Acceptance signs and interaction according E. Berną (Karpman, 2008) Acceptance signs Communication Trust
Personal (positive) ++ +++
Behavioural (positive) +++ +
Behavioural (negative) ++ -
Personal (negative) - - - - -
Lack of acceptance signs - -
Recognition is important for every individual. According to the concept of recognition
signs or economics, the person distinguishes negative and positive signs much better, but not
recognition signs in the totality (Longin, 2006). If the person felt negative signs in the past then he
feels them stronger being adult. Therefore, the person may not notice positive recognition signs.
The economics of recognition signs requires abilities to send, receiver, ask for, reject
and provide for yourself. These abilities change individually. There are two limiting notions for
recognition signs: “not enough for everyone” (oneness, rareness) and “only some people will
receive them” (control) (Karpman, 2008).
The technique of transactional analysis (TA). The main TA technique both for
individuals and groups applied in coaching aims at the analysis of life scenario – change of
childhood solutions, decisive scenario and acceptance of new solutions (Agarwal et al., 2009). Life
scenario is a subliminal plan created by a child when making decisions, conclusions that seemed to
be secure in childhood and do not meet the reality today; all it happens under perennial influence
(Karpman, 2008). Thus, in case of stressful situation the person ignores all possible ways of
solution and instinctively chooses the common way of realisation of life scenario. The final aim of
the TA technique in coaching is to achieve clients’ autonomy. TA is a theory of personality and
communication based on interaction by transactions: Parent, Child, Adult. TA states that there are
three separately acting parts in human psychics: parent, child and adult (Karpman, 2008):
Child (Ch)- appears when person is born. Child perceives the world through games. He
ensured the emotional connection with the environment. Child can be happy, he knows
how to love.
Parent (P) – is created by surrounding people. He accumulates instructions given by
more experienced person. He can be angry.
Adult (A) – logically thinking being. He does not have any emotions.
“Child” needs his mother to be together since birth. Mother ensures his safety. When
the child is able to walk he gets into a world full of dangers. The system of logical thinking
(“adult”) develops since birth. However, during the first year of life the person have not
accumulated enough of experience and ability to think logically for he could care about himself. He
is dependable on advices of elder experienced people. A “parent” appears, who accumulates the
instructions from other parents and tutors.
Life positions. Child acquires self-confidence and confidence in others. This confidence
will become a basis for life scenario selecting the most favourite main life positions from the
following ones (Downey, 2008):
I’m OK – You’re OK (+ +): ideal relation according to TA;
I’m OK – You’re not OK (+ -): anger, disgust;
I’m not OK – You’re OK (- +): humiliation;
I’m not OK – You’re not OK (- -): withdrawal, denial position.
Graphical representation is provided below:
Table 18. OK-ness (according to M. Downey, 2008)
I’m not OK –
You’re OK Passive (- +)
Submissive coaching specialist:
Subjective intentions to improve self-respect
I’m OK –
You’re OK Normal (+ +)
Categorical
Emotional coaching specialist: His is successful, because is reliable, positive, has
objective intentions.
I’m not OK –
You’re not OK Do not moving forward
Passive-aggressive (- -)
Hopeless coaching specialist:
Doubts of coaching success and possible benefit for client.
I’m OK –
You’re not OK Criticizing (+ -)
Aggressive
Directing coaching specialist:
Subjective intention to manipulate the client.
Emotionally intelligent coaching specialist applies a combination of skills, “healthy”
statements “I’m OK-You’re OK”, self-conception and conception of others as well as competence
in order to make improvement and development of coached people easier (Karpman, 2008). The
coach must put all efforts to positively concentrate on coached person applying attitude,
understanding and skills to support the person.
When “adult” accumulates sufficient amount of information and experience, he might
could assume charge of management, but “parent” sometimes returns (Berne, 2006). It may happen
in critical situation, when “adult” does not know what to do. When a person is active; a parent often
categorizing statements may be heard in his speech, for example: “nobody is allowed to do
something”. In other situations “child” is revealed in “adult”. Child could use the following words:
“I’ll go. What shall be shall be”. TA states that during communication between two people, they are
influence by one of the three components. In addition, the person addressed a certain component of
the partner. Different people relations consist in communication between “parent”, “child” or
“adult” of one person and “parent”, “child” or “adult” of another person (Berne, 2006). Such
relations are marked by the first letter of the personality component P, C, A. If one person addresses
another to invite to play (not exactly infant games), then child addressed child (C-C). “Parent”
abuses his “child” (P-C). Parent addresses parent to get approval when criticizing something (P-P).
Business communication - both “adults” (A-A). “Child” admits to “parent” he committed a crime
(C-P).
TA allows understanding what happens here and now in the interpersonal relations (two
or group of people) (Berne, 2006). TA gives the possibility to understand problems of interrelation
and nature of intervention in order to resolute these problems. TA states that conflicts arise when
not appropriate side of person answers a question or the answer is given to wrong side of person.
Personal state (Parent, Child, Adult) does not depend on age. The state explains
different psychological games, happening exchange of words (typical), which constantly repeat
psychological games that always have bad end.
According to E. Berno statement – great life guides, directions are determined in
childhood and assume a form of life scenario (Berne, 2006). Good mental health is determined by:
consciousness (mind), spontaneity and intimacy, because the fullness of personality consists of
emotions, thoughts and corresponding behaviour: Parent (P) state – correspond to thoughts,
emotions, behaviour, which the person has formed imitating his parents or other tutors, teachers;
Adult (A) – correspond to hear and now emotions, thoughts and behaviour; Child (C) – correspond
to thoughts, emotions, behaviour that could be refreshed from childhood. Question:
What is the role of player in certain situation in the example below?
Sentence with money:
Client is a representative of law order and at the same time he conducts very profitable financial
operations. Is successful in investment seeking better benefits. Manipulates with big amounts of money
(X role?);
The same client is dreaming about making great donation for the benefit of society like his father did (X
role?);
He technically neatly steals a gum and other sundries from a shop the way he did it in childhood (X
role?).
Forms of transaction. Transaction can be simple and crossed (Berne, 2006):
Simple complementary transaction, when 2 people address each other being in the
same state.
1 example:
a) – Did you manage to prepare the report?
– Yes, I’m about to send it by e-mail (A-A);
b) – Would you like to cinema after this meeting?
– With pleasure, I can’t work anymore, what movie will we watch? (C-C);
c) – You were to tide the room (P-C);
– Stop making my life a burden, I’ll arrange it (C-P).
This way of communication is stable, although words change.
Crossed transaction. Communication changes if transactions cross when addressing
other person who is in different “I” state.
2 example:
b) – Did you manage to prepare the report? (A-A);
c) – Stop making my life a burden, I’ll prepare it (C-P);
d) – How to prepare the report on time? (A-A)
e) – Write by hand, secretary will print it (P-C).
This transaction raises communication problems.
3 example:
a) – Have you finally arranged you documents? (P-C);
b) – Look, I’m arranging them right now (A-A).
This transaction changes the balance of protagonists (main players).
double (ulterior) transactions. In case of such transaction the conversation is
performed on social level, and other transactions – on psychological, unexpressed
level:
4 example:
a) – I need you to stay in the office with me this evening (A-A) (body language shows clear
sexual intention).
b) – Sure. Answer, smile, wink testify that child (C) accepts ulterior motive.
Games. One of time structuring element – psychological games must be discussed in
detail. Psychological games (in Lithuanian they are sometimes called adult games) are time
structuring element prior to intimacy element. This element is characterized by plenty of negative
recognition signs. Therefore it can be considered an opposite to the intimacy. It is a network of
double transactions that ends with drama, always predictable, but always surprising. There are not
only destructive, but also constructive games (not many of them): discussion of various leisure
topics, support, help or care, even with selfish motives, but useful for both players. Most other
games has clear destructive nature.
St. Karpman in 1968 suggested a matrix of all psychological games: drama triangle:
Victim – Rescuer – Persecutor (Lenhardt, 2002). This matrix (see figure 5) may be applied in
coaching in order to solve manipulation problems. However, one must know how to discover the
drama triangle? How to avoid it? How to quit it?
Fig. 7. Drama triangle (Karpman, 2008)
The triangle reflects the power and implicates three different, but closely related roles
(Karpman, 2008):
persecutor (guardian): aggressor, assaulter. Persecutor may be a person, event
or situation. Although it is generally accepted that the persecutor is a negative
role, but in organization he might be a real innovator, initiator, new activity
inspirator etc.
victim: role player experiencing persecutor aggression. This role is also not
preferable, but in organization a victim can take advantage of imbalanced
power equilibrium and start positive changing or reform.
rescuer: defender, prince charming. From the first sight it is a positive role, but
often the role makes the dynamics of the entire drama triangle much stronger.
Without rescuer everything would be solved faster.
Task:
Provide an example for each specified case:
Possible players of drama triangle organizations: colleague – me – administration; colleague –
colleague – me; restructurisation – me – administration; discharge – me – labour exchange; problem
situation – client – coach.
There must be not necessarily three players in the drama triangle. There might be two of
them exchanging their roles without comprehension. For example, when the player accuses others
and plays persecutor role: “if it were not for you, I would be.....”, when conditions for realisation of
his desires are created, it turns out that it is too late. The player becomes a victim from a persecutor.
Persecutor Victim
Rescuer
The coach must, first of all, know the problematic situation of the drama triangle in
order to interrupt unpromising game. Coaches (Cruellas, 2003; Devillard, 2001 et al.) rest on the
statement that behavioural change of any of the protagonists will force and influence other players,
their behaviour and lead to the end of the game.
Five stages to leave the drama triangle (Cruellas, 2003; Devillard, 2001 et al.):
1) To begin with, the player is tired of the game. According to TA (- +), therefore thinks
the game should end. Escape is possible, but it would not solve the problem.
2) To withdraw and assess current role and situation of each player. Role exchange is
possible.
3) Activity strategy is studied according to the possibilities, abilities, form of humour etc.
of the player. Searching for positive intentions in other players’ behaviour, interactions,
used metaphors etc.
4) The player clearly provides situation analysis for himself. Submits it to other players in
order to create a neutral communication. Key points of agreement are envisaged, other
players are thanked for constructive communication in order to solve the problem and
standardize communication.
5) It is verified if all the players feel well after agreement. Attempts are made to realise
newly made “modus Vivendi”20
.
After some practice this process becomes easily implementable, natural.
Games – are certain behavioural and communication forms with hidden motives. Every
player strives for benefit or advantage, positive recognition signs. During the games all
encouraging factors are in subconscious mind, the players do not realize they are playing a game
with its own rules, pre-known players, predictable results. Some games become a very important
part of our lives, i.e. become a game of life that all one will ever end. Andragogist with TA
knowledge would be able to help adult learners to solve similar problems.
Self-control questions:
1. What is the input of E. Bern into TA development?
2. What are the acceptance signs and how are they expressed?
3. How to explain the sense of transaction?
4. Why do adults indulge in different games?
5. What games did you watch or play?
6. How did you quit the game?
7. What were the consequences of the game?
8. What did you learn from your or others’ game?
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: is it necessary to say or
demonstrate the person if you agree with him? Is it necessary to say what is good? bad? How to
say these things?
COACHING SESSION TASKS 4 (see Appendix 4).
2.8. Adaptation to Cognitive Style21
The main question of the theme is – what must the andragogist providing coaching services
and seeking to adapt to learner’s cognitive style know?
Cognitive style is a widely accepted as a significant, predicting individual behaviour factor
(Brigham et al., 200722
). More than two last decades the scientists and practitioners are especially
20 modus vivendi [lot. Way of living]: 1. In international law — short-term international agreement, concluded for the
purpose of impossibility to conclude permanent agreement; 2. Format of co-existence, relationship (Tarptautinių žodžių
žodynas, 2010). 21 Extend the topic if students have not attended bachelor studies subject “Heterogeneity management”.
interested in the impact of personal cognitive style on learning, problem solving, decision making,
organization functioning (Hodgkinson, 200323
). Some of the studies of this area may be mentioned:
cognitive style is essential for personal behaviour, influencing solution making (Emsley et al.,
200624
), problem solving (Brigham et al., 200725
; Chan, 199626
), learning (López-Mesa, Thompson,
200627
), communication (Armstrong, 200428
), group processes (Buffinton et al., 200229
) and
creativity (Gelade, 200230
; Houtz et al., 200331
; Fagan, 200432
; Gallivan, 200333
).
Irrespective of specific method or theory the term cognitive style is usually related to common
preferable method (Cools, Van den Broeck, 200734
). Cognitive style has certain characteristics: (1)
it is a dimension that may be evaluated using psychometric techniques; (2) it is time-stable and does
not depend on mental abilities (intelligence); (3) has two directions (functioning in two directions)
and (4) may be differently valuable, i.e., the style characterises different, but not better thinking
processes.
Question to discuss:
1. Is there a “label sticking” risk speaking about learners group members if the cognitive style of a person is time-
stable?
2. Do not we take the opportunities of person to become involved in other activity, experience and improve at the
same time by referring the person to a certain cognitive style?
Two cognitive style concepts are distinguished in scientific research field: the first conception
characterises the cognitive style based on specific, various methods of activity and their typology.
Cognitive styles are discussed because the way of activity becomes an object of personal choice;
however, the concept of cognitive style here is not narrowed to activity method, tactics or strategy.
Therefore when speaking about cognitive styles not only favourite or chosen activity methods are
emphasized, but also the person himself, who may be characterized in various contexts of learning
or other activity. The second conception of cognitive style is based on the unique method of
combination of different activity dimensions by each person, seeking for effective learning activity.
22 Brigham K. H., De Castro J. O., Shepherd D. A. 2007. A Person-Organization Fit Model of Owner-Managers’
Cognitive Style and Organizational Demands // Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. Vol. 31, No. 1. 23 Hodgkinson G. P. 2003. The Interface of Cognitive and Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology // Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 76. 24 Emsley D., Nevicky B., Harrison G. 2006. Effect of Cognitive Style and Professional Development on the Initiation
of Radical and Non- Radical Management Accounting Innovations // Accounting & Finance. Vol. 46, No. 2. 25 Brigham K. H., De Castro J. O., Shepherd D. A. 2007. A Person-Organization Fit Model of Owner-Managers’
Cognitive Style and Organizational Demands // Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. Vol. 31, No. 1. 26 Chan D. 1996. Cognitive Misfit of Problem- Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person – Fit // Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 68, No. 3. 27 López-Mesa B., Thompson G. 2006. On the Significance of Cognitive Style and the Selection of Appropriate Design
Methods // Journal of Engineering Design. Vol. 17, No. 4. 28 Armstrong S. J. 2004. The Impact of Supervisors sors’ Cognitive Styles on the Quality of Research Supervision in
Management Education // British Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 74, No. 4. 29 Buffinton K., Jablokow K., Martin K. 2002. Project Team Dynamics and Cognitive Style// Engineering Management
Journal. Vol. 14, No. 3. 30 Gelade G. A. 2002. Creative Style, Personality, and Artistic Endeavor // Genetic, Social & Ge neral Psychology Monographs. Vol. 128, No. 3. 31 Houtz J. C., Selby E., Esquivel G. B., Okoye R. A., Peters K. M., Treffinger D. J. 2003. Styles and Personal Type //
Creativity Research Journal. Vol. 15, No. 4. 32 Fagan M. H. 2004. The Influence of Creative Style and Climate on Software Development Team Creativity: An
Exporatory Study // Journal of Computer Information Systems. Vol. 44, No. 3. 33 Gallivan M. J. 2003. The Influence of Software Developers’ Creative Style on their Attitudes and Assimilation of a
Software Process Innovation // Information and Management. Vol. 40, No. 5. 34 Cools E., Van den Broeck H. 2007. Development and Validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator // Journal of
Psychology. Vol. 141, No. 4.
Therefore, in this case not activity methods, dimensions are emphasized, but the person himself. If
the number of activity dimensions of the person is limited, risk of “label sticking” of the only style
arises.
What does the below provided extract reveal?:
“Because you have asked me, John, my dearest friend in Christ, how you should study to amass the treasure of
knowledge, such is the advice I give to you. You should choose to enter not immediately into the ocean depths, but
rather through small streams, for one should reach more difficult matters by going through the easier ones first. This is,
therefore, my admonition and your instruction. I bid you be slow to speak and slow to approach the chat-room.
Embrace purity of conscience. Do not fail to have time for prayer. You should frequently choose your own room if you wish to be led into the wine cellar. Present yourself as amiable to all. Do not look for deep, hidden meanings in the
deeds of others. To no one should you show yourself to be too familiar, because too much familiarity gives birth to
contempt and provides from its eagerness the raw material for backsliding. You should in no way involve yourself
concerning the words and deeds of worldly people. Above all else you should flee from common conversation. You
should not fail to imitate the steps of the saints and all good people. You should not consider the source from which you
hear something, but whatever good is spoken, commit it to memory. Those things that you read and hear, make sure
that you understand them. Make yourself certain about doubtful matters, and make it your business to shelve in the
bookcase of your mind whatever you can, as if desiring to fill a vase. Do not seek the matters that are above you.
Following those well-known paths you will bring forth and produce, as long as you have life, branches and fruits useful
in the vineyard of the Lord of Hosts. If you eagerly follow these points, you will be able to attain that which you are
striving after“.
Ignoti Auctoris. De mondo studendi. Corpus Thomisticum, textum.
XIII cent. Unknown author. Translation from lot. by Gintautas Vyšniauskas
Researchers analysed cognitive styles in coherence with various personality aspects, such as
personal features, abilities (Pounds, Bailey, 200135
), cognitive strategies (López-Mesa, Thompson,
200636
).
There are different ways of application of cognitive styles: in the context of task execution,
internal communication, carrier planning, consulting, team formation, conflict management,
heterogeneity management, learning and education (Cools, Van den Broeck, 200737
).
The authors who analysed the cognitive style emphasize that andragogists should almost
refuse “classical” opinions, according to which the cognitive style allows only classifying learning
group members according to their favourite and better managed learning method (Chevrier et al.,
2000)38
. Understanding of the concept of cognitive style in terms of andragogist’s activity could
serve not only for “label sticking”, but also for real help initiating self-analysis, forming beliefs,
provisions and values, initiating dialogue about whom we are and whom could become.
Repeating the expressed thoughts that “learning is an individual especially difficult
phenomenon which forces the interaction of dozen of factors related not only to learner personal
features, but also to understanding of learning context” (Romainville, 1999, p.111)39
, it may be
added that one of the main activity areas of the andragogist providing coaching services is support
/help for adult learners in understanding of their personal role in learning context. However, it
should be mentioned, what else is very important: the way the andragogist understands the learning
35 Pounds J., Bailey L. L. 2001. Cognitive Style and Learning: Performance of Adaptors and Innovators in a Novel
López-Mesa B., Thompson G. 2006. On the Significance of Cognitive Style and the Selection of Appropriate Design
Methods // Journal of Engineering Design. Vol. 17, No. 4. 37 Cools E., Van den Broeck H. 2007. Development and Validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator // Journal of
Psychology. Vol. 141, No. 4. 38 Chevrier J., Fortin G., Théberge M., LeBlanc R. 2000. La construction du style d‘apprentissage. Dans l‘Education et
Francophonie, Volume XXVIII (1), Québec:ACELF. 39 Romainville A. 1993. Savoir parler de ses méthodes. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
context of adult learners. Provision of activity reflection possibility for yourself and learners based
on cognitive style approaches is considered really essential factor of qualitative andragogist activity.
Determining and analysing favourite methods of cognitive activity of learners, the andragogist
should not forget to involve the learner (learners) (Honey, Mumford, 1995)40
.
To identify the style of learners, the andragogist may ask: what words might better
characterize individual style, what inspires learners to learn or solve their activity problems, and
what frightens, what can the andragogist do to ease learning process?
D. Kolbas specified that learning process has two dimensions: how new information,
knowledge etc. is perceived and how it is treated. Some people perceive by feelings, based on their
own specific experience (SE), others – by thinking over, analysing or systemizing – abstract
conceptualization (AC); how we treat what we perceive or how we transform and assimilate new
knowledge and information. Therefore, some people assimilate it (new knowledge and information)
through active activity and experimenting (AE), others – watch and think over the experience (TE).
L. Rieben (2000)41
emphasized “epistemological jump” of scientists, trying to understand and
explain the development process of cognitive style. Selection of learning styles or methods for
adults may be explained based on and limited to personal acquired features, genetics or
environmentally determined stable needs. However, it is possible to perform further analysis, what
was done by a group of scientists from Quebeck universities. They (Chevrier et al., 2000)42
raised a
hypothesis based on transactional approach: cognitive style is characterized not so much by
acquired or personal features, but by interaction with people important for the person from
childhood (e.g.: parents, teachers). The totality of activity significances created by a child and play
of interaction determine the selection and development of specific cognitive methods and styles and
rejection of other methods and styles. For example, encouragement of parents not to trust others
may form closed child method, closeness, resistance to novelties. Therefore, such person even being
adult will not like active experimenting. And it may impede improving cognitive activity,
developing different cognitive methods and styles.
To return to application of coaching techniques in the activity of andragogist, it is worth
to emphasize NLP once again, because it may help to adapt to cognitive style of a person. As it was
mentioned before talking about the previous topic, fundamental NLP element is that person
experiences not the real world as it is. Person uses carefully filtering internal mind maps, thus
creating the internal image of the external world. Mind map of every person is only a partial
subjective representation of external world. World map of a person is formed by interpretation of
information received from 5 sensory channels. Later the information is “coded” applying language
and words. Mind maps are only subjective interpretation, and the interpretation is not accurate.
Filtering system being a part of human mind map determines the spectrum of choices for person.
Everyone understands and treats the reality differently, because it depends on different person filters
(neurobiological, social, cultural and personal, through which the information about reality reaches
our minds (fig. 8.).
Discussion with author:
“Talking about objective and subjective reality, I think that objective reality is complicated and gives us so much
information that human mind is not and will not be ever able to fix and feel “all” the things happening around us” (V.
Masalskis).
Your comments and arguments.
40 Honey P., Mumford A. 1992. The manual of learning Styles. Maidenhead, Berkshire: PeterHoney Pub., Ardingly
House. 41 Rieben L. 2000. A quelles conditions la notion des styles d’apprentissage peut-elle devenir heuristique pour le champ
de l’éducation ? dans Education et Francophonie, Volume XXVIII (1). Québec :ACELF. 42 Chevrier J., Fortan G., LeBlanc M. 2000. Dialogue sur le sens et la place du style d’apprentissage en éducation.
Education et Francophonie, Volume XXVIII (1). Québec : ACLE., p.4.
Mechanisms of processing of information about reality are universal (general) for every
individual: selection, processing, generalization of data. So subjective reality treatment appears, and
representations are created based on these treatment. Discussion: One of mental perception process or representation, definitions, sounds like this: “perception is a one-piece reflection of
subjects, situations and events appearing as a result of impact of ultimate physical irritants on receptor surface of
sensory organs” [Psychology. Vocabulary. Red. А. V. Petrovskis, М. G. Jaroševskis. М.: Politizdat, 1990, p. 66.].
Perception models two perception functions – sensory and intuition. The above provided definition emphasizes sensory
component, i.e. subjective pole of the scale. And how are ideas perceived?
Usually the idea in psychology is treated as generalized form of reality. Is it possible to
perceive not a concrete-sensory image, but at once abstract directly without word-logic thinking, i.e.
idea? “If we answer positively, – and we do so, because we accept intuitive-irrational perception as
a fact, – we accept the idea to be individual existence, although together with material carrier” 43
.
So, different cognitive styles are distinguished according to the way we perceive and treat
reality. The most difficult is to change inborn psychological attributes, such as learning method,
dominating brain functions, temperament. Depending on them some adults give first place to
listening and speaking during learning, others – to visual information, third – to practical activity
etc. (Anužienė, 2006).
As it was mentioned, there are a lot of different classifications of cognitive styles (e.g.:
according to Kolb, Harrison, Bramson et al.). However special tests are necessary to identify them.
43 Гуленко В.В. 1993. Типологическая целостность социона. Образование соционических типов по базису Юнга
– Киев, 02.04. // СМиПЛ, 1996, № 5.
Reality
Ne
uro
logi
cal
Soci
o-c
ult
ura
l
Pe
rso
nal
Sele
ctio
n
Inte
rpre
tati
on
Sum
mar
iza
tio
n
F i l t ers
General all data processing
mechanisms
PERSONAL
REALITY
REPRESENTATIONS(past, current and future realities)
PERCEPTION
But these test may be not acceptable for everyone44
. The styles are recognised easily according to
the following classification and dominating owner’s expressions:
Optic (visual) – “I see well”, “It is clear”, “From my point of view”. Representatives of
this learning style like reading. They choose reading as a method of receiving
information instead of listening (for example, they would rather read a newspaper than
listen to the news on radio). Their answers to test questions are better when they see text,
not only hear. These people like individual learning method.
Sound (audio) – “I say myself”, “My internal voice says so”, “It sounds right”. Those
who prefer this learning style remember not only the things they have heard, but also all
the circumstances related: who and when said, told, explained. These people would
rather listen to the news than read in newspaper.
Speech-based learning style. “I say you”. Representative of this learning style like read
aloud, retell the text even if for a wall. They nicely check their knowledge by telling and
explaining to others. These people work in group with pleasure.
Activity-based learning style (kinaesthetic). “I understand that .... very well”. Activity
improves the efficiency of all learning styles for sure, because it generalizes, systemizes
thoughts and learning material. There are learners, “confessors” of the style, who make
schemes, pictures, use certain conventional signs to represent heard or read information.
There are people, who memorise the material after application in practice: transforming
in own way, imagining, creating scenarios in their minds or simply moving or walking at
that moment etc.
Thus, both children and adults perceive and manage information in three ways: visual,
sound and kinaesthetic. The first have good visual memory, characterize the scenes, objects and
faces seen several years ago. People with visual perception of information like visually represented
information: using pictures, schemes, photos, posters, highlighting essential words. Such learners
often speak quickly, in elevated tone, use many gestures, draw schemes in the air. Their working
table is kept in order not to bother the field of vision. Style of using senses. It is proved that learning
with involvement of activity, movement is very actual and effective and therefore the learners must
not only hear or see information, but also touch and feel it (Anužienė, 2006). A number of people
(Amar, Angel, 2006) distinguish a neutral learning style. In case of neutral style it might be stated
that the learner avoids giving his opinion and prefers staying uninvolved or is not very much
interested in the context and object of learning (Anužienė, 2006).
In order to adapt to the dominating cognitive style of the learner, andragogist is
recommended to:
Listen attentively to learner’s word (especially, verbs and expressions)
Determine dominating expressions.
It is difficult to specify exact number of existing cognitive styles, because there are a
huge number of different classifications. The andragogist, who wants to achieve better results, must
make it possible to work with certain task applying different methods – only then the learners will
reveal their skills to the extent possible.
The andragogist might be able to recognize individual differences. Gender, cultural
layer, place of birth, occupation, education, types of personality, cognition method – only some of
the factors contributing to different cognitive styles. If we will recognize and respect the
differences, we will reduce the probability of misunderstanding, conflicts or umbrage. Lots of
things depend on temperament. For example, extraverts may monopolize conversations, take
initiative and talk wild. Introverts, who think at first and then say, may think that extraverts are
impolite and annoying. Extravert consider introverts being doubtful loners. It would be beneficial
44 Some tests on determination of cognitive style and their interpretation are provided in the course of aandragogy study
subject “Heterogeneity management”.
for both to understand the differences of each other and accordingly correct conversation style. In
this case andragogist may help providing coaching services or who have taught learners to perform
some of his functions.
To summarize, not only andragogist’s objective to adapt to learner’s cognitive style
should be emphasized, but also it would be valuable to pay attention affective dimension of the
cognitive style during determination and analysis of cognitive style. Learners’ affective reactions
appear as an inseparable reality of cognitive style. There are both positive and negative affective
reactions. It depends on if the learner accepts, likes the learning context, if the context conforms to
his beliefs, provisions, values and etc. The conformity of the context is a very important factor
during organization of group learning activity. It is a very important factor influencing learning
motivation and results. The significance on affective dimension of cognitive style should be
accordingly assessed by the andragogist and should be not pushed to the end of his activity
priorities, because the affective dimension of cognitive style allows successful coordination of two
subjects relevant for every learner: recognition and feelings, emotions, values and attitudes.
Self-control questions:
1. What are the main characteristics of cognitive style?
2. What are the dominating cognitive styles expressed in your group?
3. What must andragogist do in case he doesn’t have psychometric tests dedicated for
determination of cognitive style, but want to help the learner?
7 task for individual work (see Appendix 1)
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: what must the andragogist
providing coaching services and seeking to adapt to learner’s cognitive style know?
3. Activity Peculiarities and Competence of Coach, Abilities Required for the
Activity The main question of the theme is – what abilities does competent coaching specialist
require?
Although it is not the best way to begin with discussion of whom the coach is not,
because we do not think using negative images, but let’s try. So, coaching specialist is not a
psychotherapist or consultant, he is not an advisor or mentor, not a teacher, although he is somehow
similar to all mentioned people.
The coach considers his client an equal partner. Both of them determine goal,
environment, desirable results of coaching, but the client is responsible for his personal goals. From
this point of view the client is an owner of coach content.
Coaching specialist is an expert in coaching process and responsible person for
coaching environment at the same time. His function is expressed in partnership. Coaching
specialist is obliged to understand the peculiarities of the activity of his client, but he is not a
profession expert. If the coach will ask his client appropriate questions, the last will find answers
himself.
Functions of the coach:
To reveal and find out together with the client what would they like to do, what
measurements and time-defined goals they want to achieve after conclusion of fixed-term
coaching agreement;
To help the client to establish his motives, strategies, competences;
To discuss with the client all possible goal achievement methods;
To inform the client about goal achievement consequences unfavourable for the client;
To help the client to create his own strategy and methods of solution of personal problem;
To warn the client if coaching is not effective. In such case the agreement must be
terminated.
Professional coaching specialist must often analyse and assess the efficiency and performance
of coaching process.
International Coach Federation has distinguished eleven competences required for the activity
of coaches:
1. Setting the foundation:
1.1. meeting ethical guidelines and professional standards;
1.2. establishing the coaching agreement: to understand what is necessary and agree
with new client about the methods of coaching procedure and communication.
2. Co-creating the relationship:
2.1. establishing trust and intimacy with the client;
2.2. create open, flexible and calming communication atmosphere.
3. Communicating effectively:
3.1. listen to the client attentively, understand the things he says or does not say and
help him to express his thoughts;
3.2. ask the client questions allowing collection of missing information;
3.3. use direct and indirect communication methods.
4. Facilitating Learning and Results:
4.1. be able to integrate, precisely assess various information sources and provide the
client suggestions that would help to achieve envisaged goals.
4.2. together with the client envisage coaching success criteria and constantly revise
them, envisage everyday situations, actions that would help to reach results;
4.3. plan and envisage goals;
4.4. be able to focus attention to what is actual for the client leaving him a
responsibility for his actions.
8 task for individual work (in writing) (see Appendix 1)
Y. Richez (2006) states that today coaching is not a perfect phenomenon, however, it
will extend in future decade. He suggests professional development of coaching specialists based on
his researches and interdisciplinary approach to coaching. The main recommendations for
professional development:
Whereas there is no formal training of coaches in Lithuania, coach’s learning achievements
acquired in non-formal and spontaneous learning environment should be assessed and
accepted. A committee consisting of representatives of different disciplines and culture;
Assess coach’s experience based on methodology focused on practice theorization,
perception of interaction applying individual/environment model and application of the
model, symbolic recovery of meaning;
Assess coach’s personal creation (methods, model, questionnaire etc.) taking into account
acquired experience and education;
Assess the spread of personal creation, coach’s participation in conferences, seminars,
discussions etc.;
Assess coach’s publications (if any).
IFOD University (France) suggests training of professional coaching specialists. Head
of Deontology Committee of the university, the first university president, member of the French
Coaches Association O. Devillard (2001) states that coaching is an intervention process that aims at
development of internal potential (power) elements of a person or a whole group, related to talent,
style and synergy despite influencing them difficulties. Coaching is a method for client to reveal,
test and develop not reveals and not used power elements. The truth is that coach not so much helps
to resolute problems as facilitates personal development in terms of perspective.
If we define coaching as an intervention process, we give it a shade of specific activity
designed to ensure personal development at the same time. Coaching specialist becomes a
companion or partner in personal development. It may be compared to personal sport coach, but in
professional or personal activity area (Le Deuff, 2002) with the main mission to help the client
clearly set his goals, envisage realisation strategy and be around the client.
The most privileged coaching tool is conversation. Many coaches communicate with
their clients through telephone or e-mail. To open dialogue is very important when coaching
specialist using different questionnaires, communication tasks, asking his client appropriate
questions at right time is trying to induce the client to his side and destroy non-confidence defence
activity. The coach tries to identify client’s powers and weaknesses, perform valuation and
revaluation of values as well as evoke all hidden powers of personal and professional development
(Gori, Coz, 2006, p. 73).
In the course of coaching session the client has to perform certain theory (e.g.: clarify
envisaged goals, create new strategy for goal achievement etc.) or practical (e.g.: to develop new
attitude to colleagues, do not crack nuts between dinner and supper etc.) tasks.
Coaching is a young practice requiring various scientific approaches. Terms
“coaching” and “coach” in foreign countries are not translated.
The status of coaching specialist today is not clear, but demand for coaching increases.
Statistics states that from 2000 till 2003 the number of ICF members increased from 1500 to 6000.
According to the Federation statement there were more than 20 000 coaching specialists till 2005,
who have ICF certificates and make a practice of coaching all over the world (three fourths of them
in USA).
Most of psychotherapists believe that coach has no right to overstep psychotherapy
boundaries, although they had necessary training. In fact coaching has no therapeutic objectives,
however, some coaches apply their methods systematically, helping their patients to experience
long and hard treatment period easier (e.g.: cancer, AIDS therapy) or forming new behaviour or
new way of life required for health.
After analysis of the results of scientific researches performed by USA scientists
(Vale, Jelinek, 2003; Jaarsma, Van der Wal; 2004; White More Melkus, 2004) it may be assumed
that coaching methods may be applied along with therapy methods (Lainé, 2000).
In 1997, 181 women with breast cancer were coached. Coaching helped to maintain
better relations with relatives during depressive period of treatment and recovery.
The second research was performed in participation of 792 patients with heart and
vascular diseases. The research aimed at helping to decrease cholesterol amount in blood applying
coaching – the goal was achieved.
1050 patients with heart and vascular diseases participated during the following
research. The research aimed at justification of efficiency of applied coaching. A conclusion was
made in 2005 – coaching application together with therapy helps the patients decrease the risk of
heart and vascular diseases.
The following research was performed in 2004. 53 women with type II diabetes
participated. The research aimed at coaching application in order to help the patients to understand
and “manage” diabetes. The research revealed that after five educational, behavioural changes,
emotional state coaching sessions, women began better “manage” their disease, desperation
decreased, treatment satisfaction increased.
Coaching specialist is often considered expert of changes, therefore it is very
important for him to know his client’s situation today and his desired situation for tomorrow. Only
then it is possible to envisage fastest and the most effective approaches and methods to change.
Diagnostic and prognostic activity functions of coaching specialist do not envisage elimination of
client’s problem basically, so he does no miracles. But he helps the client to achieve envisaged,
certain and easy-to- measure goal.
Check if you are able to answer the main question of the theme: what abilities does competent
coaching specialist require?
3.1. Deontological Code of Coach
9 task for individual work (see Appendix 1)
Deontology [deon (originated from deontos) + ↗...logy]: 1. the branch of ethics
dealing with duty commitment (Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, 2009).
Ethics and position of coaching specialist towards the client is revealed in the main
competences. Deontology code elements may be as well observed. The main competences of
coaching specialists according to ICF standards are as follows:
A. Setting the foundation
1. Meeting ethical guidelines and professional standards
2. Establishing the coaching agreement
B. Co-creating the relationship
3. Establishing trust and intimacy with the client
4. Full-rate attention in the course of coaching
C. Communicating effectively
5. Active listening
6. Perfect listening skills
7. Direct, open communication
D. Facilitating Learning and Results
8. Creating awareness
9. Designing actions
10. Planning and goal setting
11. Managing process and accountability
A. Setting the foundation
1. Meeting ethical guidelines and professional standards – understanding of coaching
ethics and standards and ability to apply them properly in all coaching situations.
a) Understands and demonstrates competence in ICF behavioural standards (see the list)
b) Understands and adheres to all ICF ethics guidelines (see the list)
c) Is able to clearly name the difference between coaching, consulting, psychotherapy and other
assistance offering professions
d) If needed and knew when needed refers the client to other professional taking into account
available resources.
2. Establishing the coaching agreement – ability to understand what is required in
certain coaching interaction and agree with potential or new client on coaching process and
relationship.
a) Understands and effectively discusses with the client coaching relationship guidelines and
certain parameters (e.g.: logistics, pay, graphic, if required, other personal involvement)
b) Agrees on what will be acceptable and not during coaching, what will be suggested and not,
also on the responsibilities of coach and client. Determines if the selected coaching method
fully complies with potential client’s needs
B. Co-creating the relationship
3. Establishing trust and intimacy with the client – ability to create secure supporting
environment empowering mutual respect and trust.
a) Shows sincere interest in prosperity and future of the client
b) Always demonstrates personal honesty, probity and sincerity
c) Seeks for clear agreements and keeps his words
d) Shows respect to client’s feelings, learning habits and personality
e) Persistently supports and stimulates new behaviour and actions, including those with risk and
fear of being unsuccessful
f) Asks the client permit if during the session sensitive new zones are touched
4. Full-rate attention in the course of coaching – ability to fully understand and create open, flexible
and self-confident spontaneous relation with the client.
a) Demonstrates interest and flexibility during coaching, “dances with client at the current
moment”
b) Considers his intuition and trusts his internal voice – “listens to his internal voice”
c) Is open for strangeness and not afraid of risk
d) Sees a lot of methods of cooperation with the client and chooses the most effective of them
e) Effectively applies humour for creation of easy and energetic atmosphere
f) Safely changes attitude perspective and performs actions, experimenting with new
opportunities
g) Demonstrates stability in case of strong emotions, is able to recover and evade client’s
emotions
C. Communicating effectively
5. Active listening – ability focus attention on what the client says and does not say in
order to understand the meaning of said things and encourage self-expression.
a) Adapts to the client and his order not forcing the client to adapt to coach’s agenda
b) Listens to client’s bothers, goals, values and beliefs about what is possible or impossible
c) Distinguishes the meaning of words, voice tone and body language
d) In order to ensure clarity and understanding generalizes, paraphrases, repeats and reflects what
Read the text and distinguish at least five statements that would integrate all the above
provided coaching definitions to one concept:
C. Higy-Lang, C. Gellman (2000): “Coaching is a help process for professionals or group of
professionals in the area of their professional activity. Coaching focuses on the person
seeking to maintain optimal efficiency level, better recognition of himself and others and
environment. Coaching helps to reveal personal intellect, organizational and creative
powers. At the same time, coaching helps to manage contacts with others based on
psychological or interrelation peculiarities”.
D. Millman (1997): “Internal power athletes only become their masters, because the divide
self-development efforts equally for all development elements (physical, mental, emotional).
So perfect equilibrium of all elements is obtained”.
F. Délivré (2002): “Coaching is an entire gamma of conversations with yourself and the
third person (coaching specialist). The objective of such conversation is to agree with you
and envisage and achieve the goals both in personal and professional area”.
C. Colona (2007): “The mission of coaching is to help to become continuous change master,
eat change paradigm and based on it sort out our life. Coaching specialist – a satellite of the
client seeking for greater competence, responsibility and self-confidence”.
J. Y. Arrivé, I. Frings-Juton (2004): “Organizational coaching is common coach and client
work during set period for the reason of development of professional and managerial
abilities depending on existing purely technical competence. The client is suggested a
gamma of methods, tools helping to solve a problem, adapt to professional situation,
develop self-efficiency and autonomy in the course of coaching”.
P. Longin (2006): “To be a coaching specialist is, first of all, good knowledge of yourself
and others and possession of required abilities”.
V. Lenhardt, L. Buratti (2006): “Coaching is at the same time a help and joined creation
process of client and coach. During the intervention, coaching specialist becomes a satellite
for client’s professional and personal activity. Coaching objective is to provide conditions
for the client enabling him to find not simultaneous solution, but the way of problem solving
leading to global and perspective personal development”.
M. Paul (2004): “Coaching – past failures cancellation. It is specific human position and
role”.
2 Individual work task
Read the text and mark all the facts proving coaching significance and all the
cases when coaching is criticized. Continue doing so throughout the course. Make three
groups at the end of the course and prepare poster presentation: “Vision of coaching
advantages and disadvantages”
Facts and critics. In cooperation with partners from France, we have the opportunity to observe the
development of coaching in the country for already a decade. We were acquainted with the
opposition, criticism, observed various manifestations. It should be noted that coaching in France
has its own nomenclature.
2004, VII university in Paris in two years trained 600 certified coaching specialists.
2006, 130 mil. Euro – annual turnover of coaching in Paris region. From 3000 – 4000
professionals only annual turnover of some hundreds reached 100 000 Euro. Most of them
earn approximately 25 000 Euro per year, therefore also practice another activities –
learning or consulting (Darres, according to the data of 2007).
AFNOR45
has accepted coaching specialist ISO competency norms. Every coach as if
is looking for better activity ways, certificates of higher level in order to satisfy and calm his clients,
opposition, organizations, future coaching specialists, public opinion and prove the value of
coaching. However, coaching has enough paradoxes, mixes of theories specified by coaching critics
(Gori, Le Coz, 2006)46
. The last consider coaching a humanistic psychology neoliberal modification
dedicated “to help us, adult adolescents, do not resist the course of life, say “yes” to everything
what must happen” (Gori, Le Coz, 2006, p. 23)47
.
3 Individual work task
Continue the above provided list of reasons of loss of workers efficiency based on the analysis of scientific
literature. Justify your opinion in writing.
The reasons of loss of worker efficiency in case of triads:
unfaithfulness to organization;
complaints (written);
negative provisions;
weak responsibility (energy);
lack of self-confidence;
insensibility to some nonverbal communication signs;
desire to know everything;
disrespect of the agenda of the head;
tendency to politicise;
work too much (Farfel, 2002).
4 Individual work task
Solve crosswords and brain-teaser prepared by
YOUR COLLEGUES in order to better memorize and
understand coaching phenomenon.
Correctly solved crosswords and brain-teaser will
be taken into account during assessment of final test.
CROSSWORD PREPARED BY DARIUS SIDABRAS, Ist YEAR MASTER’S STUDENT,
(2012)
45 AFNOR (Association française de Normalisation) – French National Organization for Standardization. 46 Gori R., Le Coz P. (2006). L‘empire des coachs. Une nouvelle forme du contrôle social. Alain Michel 47 Ibid, p. 23.
9
1 15
19 2
7 12 14
18 3 13
17
4
11 5
16
6 10
20
8
1. The main function of andragogist in adult education. (helper)
2. Efficient, giving the best or required results. (effective)
3. Shortened form of coaching specialist in spoken language, loanword. (coach)
4. The main role of coaching is to develop human…………. (potential)
5. Image misrepresentation because of different transverse enlargement of its parts. (distortion)
6. End of the famous phrase of R. Descartes ,”I think, therefore I…………” (am)
7. Integral part of coaching. (mentoring)
8. Information exchange. (communication)
9. Type of communication. (nonverbal)
10. Area of influence of coaching. (behaviour)
11. Learning style based on personal activity. (kinaesthetic)
12. A technique applied in organizations in order to make worker personal development more effective. (coaching)
13. Not pleasant, tensioned emotional state. (frustration)
14. Wordy or behavioural interaction between two people. (transaction)
15. Inverse relationship - …………… (feedback)
16. ……………effect. (butterfly)
17. Interaction between people with exchange of thoughts and emotions. (communication)
18. Most often raised learning problem. (cognitive)
19. It is required for moving, creation, activity. (energy)
20. The originator of coaching is….. (Socrates)
ANSWERS TO THE CROSSWORD
9
1 H E L P E R 15
E 19 E N E R G I J A 2 E F F E C T I V E Y
7 E 12 14 Š
18 M R K T Y 3 C O A C H B A 13 F R U S T R A C I J A
O N A U A 17
G 4 P O T E N C I A L Č N B
N O I 11 K I N E S T E T I N I S 5 D I S T O R T I O N N N A N
T Y I G K 16 D R U G I O
Y 6 E S U 10 E L G S E N A C R
V T 20 S I A
I Ė S J V
N 8 K O M U N I K A C I J A I
I K M
O R A
A S
T
A
S
CROSSWORD PREPARED BY IEVA ŽILINSKIENĖ, Ist YEAR ANDRAGOGY MASTER’S STUDENT,
(2012)
1 One of the areas of application of coaching.
2 The fifth logic level of adaptation to the environment.
3 The main ability of coaching specialist.
4 Type of transaction.
5 Structural part of individual and team coaching.
6 One of the meanings of “to coach”.
7 “Un cocher” in English.
8 Stage of coaching intervention process.
9 Who did distinguish the registers of coaching as a complex phenomenon?
10 “You can take the horse to the water, but you can't make it drink” – whose proverb is it?
11 Biological encoding.
12 Stage of explanatory conversation process.
13 Time structuring element.
14 To understand verbal and nonverbal answers of a person or a group and exactly identify what they feel and think at that moment.
To know different distinctive features of cognitive style, to hear out learners words (especially
verbs and expressions), establish dominating expressions.
APPENDIX 3 STRATEGY OF DISCUSSIONS
Students who do not dare to be involved to discussions have different reasons for that:
some of them do not trust their opinion, feel uncomfortable offering their opinion, maybe, some
have bad recollections from similar past experience and are afraid it will repeat again. Others,
maybe, do not know how to enter discussions and are afraid of new unknown not clear language,
vocabulary, expressions etc. This often happens to adults, especially when they have low self-
assessment and self-confidence. Discussion strategy is a perfect basis to start discussions,
especially with groups that have little or do not have any experience. This strategy helps to enter
into discussions, debates more actively, and at the same time enhances the possibility of acquisition
of positive experience that becomes a motivating factor for further involvement to and participation
in the process of studies and individual learning.
Advices:
Prior to starting discussions, an attention to the check-list of competences for discussion
realisation should be paid; read it thoroughly. You must follow it in the course of entire
discussion, therefore be sure that everything is clear and understandable (see the check0list
below).
How do you know that somebody is actively listening to? What do you do when you listen
to actively? How do such people look? What do you say, when you don’t understand what is
said?
What do you do when you want the speaker to repeat the same thing in other words? How
do you know that you have understood the way the speaker wanted you to understand? What
do you do when you want the speaker to confirm your correct understanding?
Sometimes people agree with each other and sometimes not. Sometimes they strongly
disagree; or disagree regarding some points. In any case it is very important to know what
other people think about outspoken thoughts and opinions. Examples of “constructive
answers” are provided not to “hang up’ the discussion and develop it in order student, not
lecturers, could enter into the discussion.
Before proceeding to other topic, the previous must be discussed and summarized,
conclusions made.
131
When different expressions, opinions are heard out, it is usually difficult to understand if
“speaker adheres to the initial opinion, or the opinion has changed”. Therefore it is worth to
check opinions once again and then generalize and present starting with “We adhere to the
opinion that”
The beginning could also be the following: “In our opinion....”; “After consideration of all
ideas and alternatives we came to a conclusion that ....”
Discussion participant should use the “check-list” during discussions.
If you have heard that someone is expressing his opinion in some of the ways and uses the
methods of active listening and etc., you should put a √ next to corresponding line in the
“check-list”.
Ask the speaker to control his expressions and speech in the same way.
At the end of discussion ask the participants to go through the “check-list” once again and
complement it more than it was said during discussions.
Finally spend 5 - 10 minutes to think over, how the group felt during discussions, if the list
helped to enter into discussions, if they would use it again in similar discussion.
Introduction with all explanations and discussion of examples may take up to 30 minutes. If
it is still unclear for participants what they are expected to do, additional time may be given
to discussion of competences. It is necessary during the first session to provide sufficient
attention to discussion of the “check-list”.
COMPETENCE CHECK-LIST FOR EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION IN DISCUSSIONS
FORM OF ASSESSMENT AND SUPERVISION OF OURSELVES/COLLEAGUES
ACTIVE LISTENING
I’m actively listening to speakers and “filtering” their expressions in my mind (demonstrates
nonverbal response).
I generalize the main ideas in my mind.
I note the relevant things, ideas that seem to me to be valuable, write down raised questions,
am ready to participate in the discussion.
CHECK OF UNDERSTANDING
I ask for explicitation if necessary: “Could you explain, please?”
I ask for examples or confirmation of my thoughts if necessary: “Could you provide
examples, please?; Is such example appropriate?“
I paraphrase speakers ideas in order to check if I understood correctly: “In other words, …; I
understood that…; From what has been said I understood that …; do you think about…?”
CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE
I express partial acceptance/opposition: “I partly agree/disagree with your idea...; I do not
agree with your idea that...”
I emphasize what has been said: “I would like to emphasize that…”
I add my opinion to what has been said: “I would like to add….”
I express an opinion, beliefs and decisions: “I believe/I do not believe that it is appropriate
…”
ARGUMENTATIVE POSITION
I express my support/lack of support: “I agree/disagree with…”;
I summarize my ideas: “Based on the statements made, I conclude that ...” “Considering all
any ideas, I conclude that…”
132
The “check-list” is required to ensure “common language” for everyone during debates. It is a
reminder of basic rules; they should be useful in any “civilized discussion”.
The “check-list” is justified by determination of what makes the discussion more meaningful,
how to conclude it, make conclusions; example can help those who are a little “confused” at the
beginning of discussion.
APPENDIX 4
PRACTICAL TASKS TASK 1:
1. Find your personal goal and its realization stages according to the provided
GROW model.
2. Work in groups, where one will perform the role of coaching specialist (will
help to clarify the goal), and others – of clients.
3. You may exchange roles if you want to.
4. Prepare a report on performed roles and present it during the next lecture.
5. Specify what obstacles did you encounter, what was good, what failed to do
during the task, what should be done in order to perform the role of
coaching specialist in better way.
CONVERSATION TASK 2
1. Get into groups of three people and make coaching conversation on chosen topic
according to below provided roles.
2. Discuss the conversation with members of the group and lecturer.
3. You may read below provided appendix 5 with coaching EXAMPLE before the
conversation.
I role:
Aim of the conversation – speak and then point out ideas of the conversation.
Do I feel that I was listened to and heard, understood?
Do I feel certain of the man who asked me if I felt positive recognition signs (sympathy,
warmth, attention, sincerity, interest and respect) and if I felt the antipathy from them?
Did I feel that I could express my ideas freely unaffrighted by criticism, questioning,
inquiry, assignment to any stereotype, interpretations having nothing to do with me and my
practice
Did I feel that during the conversation I got help by rewording question, explaining to me
what was unclear?
II role:
Aim of the conversation – manage the time, ask questions, paraphrase statements, stimulate the
conversation.
What basic ideas and thoughts of conversation did I understand?
What was my impression towards the conversation?
Could I feel myself during the conversation and communicate without any obstacles?
Were my emotions towards this person positive (respect, sympathy, attention, sincerity)?
Did I allow the speaker to be himself?
Haven’t I fallen to temptation – to give advice, assess, accelerate reaction, listen to my
interpretations?
Do I feel I helped him?
How many times did I use paraphrase and what kind of paraphrase?
133
III role:
Aim of the conversation – to listen and point out what is happening.
The main idea of the
client/speaker
Behaviour of coaching
specialist
(+ -)
Nonverbal expression
A – assessment
I – interpretation
S – support
L – listening
S – solution proposal, search of
solution
R – rewording
P1 – understanding of other
person
Facial expression
Body movements
Mimics
Did you have possibility to distinguish conversation stages from what you have noticed?
What did you understand about the essence of the conversation (e.g.: education)?
About the person?
About the technique of the conversation?
TASK 3 – GAME “Mafia”48
Rules of psychological game
1. At the beginning of the game everyone receives a card with indicated participant’s role.
Roles are not known to other players until a certain moment of the game.
2. The following roles are distinguished: “Goodies” (Common citizens, Detective, Doctor).
“Baddies” (Mafia family members, Mafia boss)
3. There is a do-or-die war between “goodies” and “baddies” in a town.
4. The game ends when one of confronting sides is fully removed.
48 The author of the game, Dmitriy Davidov, was born in 1965. After he left secondary school he was accepted to
psychology studies at Lomonosov Moscow State University. He created the game in spring 1988. This event was
related to preparation of course paper. There is a rumour that the paper was prepared on request of KGB. The
appearance of the game was inspired by popular those days criminal serial “La piovra”, the story of fearless Commissar
Cattani. “Wink murder” game of the middle of XX century in Europe is deemed to be the prototype ‘Mafia” game.
However, there was a role of the only murder to be identified in the mentioned game. The game by Dmitriy Davidov is
well wider. The game became popular very fast. Soon the game was played in hostels of the university during evenings
and other students meetings. In summer, students were going to different camps so that spreading the game among a
huge number of higher educational institutions of the Soviet Union. When Dmitriy Davidov left his studied he started teaching student from Eastern Europe in the same Moscow University. It is not a surprise, that the game became
popular in Eastern Europe too. In early 1990s Dmitriy Davidov moved to USA. Nowadays he lives in Boston and
teaches in Harvard University. Thus, the game spread all over the world. In 1998 Kaliningrad Higher School, where
officers for Russian internal affair system were trained, the game was included to the programme of psychological
training. In Chine “Mafia” game is applied to treat gambling addictives. In Japan it is included to the jury training
program. “Mafia” belongs to 50 best games of all times. A huge advantage of the game is that it perfectly unites
entertainment, passion and possibility to effectively improve communication skills. The game may be played by two
players. The maximum number of players may reach 20 and more people. One game session depending on the number
of participants and experience may last from 0.5 to 2 hours (G. Masalskis, 2010).
134
Game progress
1. All players sit around a table in order to see each other better.
2. The Moderator: “Night”.
3. All players close their eyes.
4. The Moderator: the members of mafia wake up, open their eyes and pick a victim.
5. The victim is silently gestured to indicate mafia target to the moderator.
6. The Moderator: Mafia close their eyes again.
7. The Detective wakes up.
8. The Detective opens his eyes and point to player to show the moderator assumed mafia
member.
9. The Moderator indicates the target’s innocence or guilt by using gestures such as nodding or
head shaking.
10. The Moderator: The Detective goes asleep.
11. The Doctor wakes up.
12. The Doctor “rescues” the victim. If the player he chooses was selected by the mafia as the
victim, the Doctor saves his life.
13. The Moderator: The Doctor goes asleep. The day breaks.
14. All are “awake” (open their eyes).
15. If the victim was not rescued by the Doctor, the Moderator names the victim of the night and
asks the victim to leave the cycle.
16. Now the citizens must find out who is the “mafia” in the cycle. The mafia wishing to divert
suspicion, of cause, also actively participates in the search. Mafia members take action by
asking different questions and sharing their reasoning.
17. The behaviour, reactions and responses to questions of the participants is watched.
18. The players give the names of suspects to the Moderator.
19. The Moderator writes down the names of “suspects” on a blackboard.
20. The suspects have a right to speak out and defend themselves.
21. The game proceeds with voting. The suspect who gets more votes is convicted and defence
dropped out from the cycle. The suspect reveals his real role.
22. After the judgement the Moderator continues the game saying that it is getting dark and
night is setting in…
23. New game cycle begins. The game lasts until a clear victory of “goodies” or “baddies”.
Analysis and discussion of the advice
Spontaneously arising situation during the game are a good ground not only for expression of good
communication skills of the participants. It is a chance to assess our strong and developed sides.
Whereas game session cycle is repeated several times during the class, a good opportunity appears
to “work” with improvable competences. Leading examples of behavioural situations and most
appropriate components to try to adapt to yourself may be found while watching the actions of
colleagues.
Foresights are shared, various treatment strategies are analyzed, personal experiences are expressed,
conclusions and generalizations are drawn during discussion. The way of effective transfer of the
experience acquired in the course of classes into the daily life and professional activity work is
discussed.
COACHING SESSION TASK 4
1. Get into groups of three people and make coaching SESSION on chosen topic
according to available roles (client, coaching specialist, observer (records coaching
progress) applying TA technique.
135
2. Prepare a report on the session and discuss the session with members of the group
and lecturer.
3. Indicate problems and advantages revealed in the course of the session (in the
report).
4. Provide problem elimination suggestions (in the report).
5. You may read below provided appendix 5 with coaching EXAMPLE once again
before the conversation and use it as a basis during the session.
6. Duration of the session – 30 min.
7. Record coaching session on voice recorder or film.
8. Demonstrate to the group the most successful and failed part of the session. Provide
comments on what should be improved in Your and colleagues activity.
APPENDIX 5
PRACTICAL EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION OF COACHING TECHNIQUES (TA –
TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS)
E. Bern eight coaching stages (questioning, specification, confrontation, explication,