Top Banner
Education and the Social Web Promise or Peril? A Media-Historical Analysis N. Friesen & S. Lowe
27

Education and the social web promise or peril

May 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Norm Friesen

Facebook and other social media have been hailed as delivering the promise of a new socially engaged education learning and educational experiences for undergraduate, self-directed and other sectors. A theoretical and historical analysis of these media in the light of earlier media transformations however puts this into question. Specifically, the analysis provided here questions whether social media platforms satisfy a crucial component of learning – fostering the capacity for debate and disagreement. Using mMedia theorist Raymond William's analytical frame that emphasisesis on advertising in his analysis of the content and form of the medium, television, allows us towe weigh the structural conditions of dominant social networking sites as constraints for learning, using his critical analytical frame(?). Williams’ critique focuses on the structural characteristics of sequence, rhythm and flow of television as a cultural form. Our critique proposes information design, architecture and above all algorithm as similar structural characteristics that apply to social networks as a different but related cultural form. We shed new light on media influencing non-commercial television content (as Williams's terms sequence, rhythm and flow account for) by proposing that the operation of commerce in non-commercial Web 2.0 content can be correspondingly accounted for by informational design, architecture and algorithm. Illustrating the ongoing salience of media theory for researchstudying on-line learning, the article updates Williams work while leveraging it in a critical discussion of the suitability of some social media for education.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Education and the social web promise or peril

Education and the Social Web Promise or Peril? A Media-Historical AnalysisN. Friesen & S. Lowe

Page 2: Education and the social web promise or peril

Outline

• Definitions, caveats and limitations• Raymond Williams and the PLE• New Media Business Models• Customizing Audiences for Advertisers• Architecture/Algorithm of Conviviality

Page 3: Education and the social web promise or peril

Definitions, Caveats, etc.

• Focus on commercial social media; • Excludes Wikis as social/collaborative media • Excludes open source networking (e.g. Elgg,

Diaspora, Wordpress) • Focus on collaboration in education• Excludes the “cyberwarfare”

ongoing in North Africa

Page 4: Education and the social web promise or peril

Why is this important?• Facebook: 600 million users; integrated chat,

mail and video• ½ of Facebook users are students (2008)

• ½ of users are between the ages of 18 & 24 (2008)

• Facebook is: “student space – developmentally and generationally specific”

• “almost 60 percent of students who use social networking talk about education topics

• more than 50 percent talk specifically about schoolwork” (NSBA, 2007).

• Facebook as a threat to the Web itself

Page 5: Education and the social web promise or peril

The Personal Learning Environment

Page 6: Education and the social web promise or peril

Muñoz & Towner, 2009; Siemens, 2006

• “Facebook is a network that connects students with other students, indirectly creating a learning community – a vital component of student education.”

• “Facebook provides instructors opportunities and structures by which students can help and support one another by building their courses atop the community already established by the students themselves” (Muñoz & Towner, 2009)

• “knowing” itself is seen to be “defined by connections” making “learning primarily a network forming process” (Siemens, 2006)

Page 7: Education and the social web promise or peril

Raymond Williams• “Countless detailed studies of all kinds

of media are guided and informed by his careful and penetrating outlines of a theory of media as a form of cultural production.” (Lister et al, 2003)

• Flow: "the defining characteristic of broadcasting, simultaneously as a technology and as a cultural form" (Williams, 1975, p. 86, 93).

• Commercial TV: “an intrinsic setting of priorities: a partisan indication of real social sources.”

• “...to see international news brought courtesy of a toothpaste is not to see separable elements, but the shape of a dominant cultural form.”

Page 8: Education and the social web promise or peril

• The product that “the networks sell is the attention of audiences; their primary market is the advertisers themselves”

• The goal was to “assemble the largest and richest possible audiences, for whose attention advertisers will pay the highest rates” (Todd Gitlin, 1980)

• Viewers medium/form Advertisers

$

TV: How it worked?

Page 9: Education and the social web promise or peril

Google and Facebook: Business models

• Facebook made appx. US$500 million from advertising in 2009 (Ostrow, 2010)

• Facebook was estimated to earn US$1.5 billion from ads in 2010 (Kirkpatrick, 2010).

• Facebook’s market valuation as high as $50 billion

• Google: in 2009, it earned US$24 billion revenue, $6.5 billion profit from its advertising programs (economist 2010).

Page 10: Education and the social web promise or peril
Page 11: Education and the social web promise or peril

Facebook search

Page 12: Education and the social web promise or peril
Page 13: Education and the social web promise or peril

Querying a Relational Database

Page 14: Education and the social web promise or peril

FQL

• SELECT name FROM user WHERE uid = me()• parent, mother, father, sibling, child

sister, brother, son, daughter• significant_other_id, relationship_status,

political, current location, education_history• SELECT name, birthday, child, current location,

relationship FROM family WHERE uid ="6168308"• SELECT user_id, education_history,

relationship_status FROM like WHERE object_id="122706168308"

Page 15: Education and the social web promise or peril

Definition of Audiences as Products

• This is the real Facebook homepage for its its real customers, its privileged “premium users”

• Audience-products can be very precisely defined or targeted by advertisers for them to purchase

• Relationship stays the same; the terms involved defined much, much more precisely

• Viewers medium/form Advertisers $

Page 16: Education and the social web promise or peril

Raymond Williams... “commerical content”

The sponsorship of programmes [read: web and feed content] by advertisers has an effect beyond the separable announcement and recommendation of a brand name. It is, as a formula of communication, an intrinsic setting of priorities: a partisan indication of real social sources. ...to see international news brought courtesy of a toothpaste [today: Netflix or HP] is not to see separable elements, but the shape of a dominant cultural form. (p. 66)

Page 17: Education and the social web promise or peril

Raymond Williams... User-created content

The insertion of advertisements in unsponsored programmes [read: user content] is a different formula; it has had, as we shall see, extraordinary effects on television as a sequential experience, and has created quite new visual rhythms. Indeed it is possible to see television of this kind as a sequence in which the advertisements are integral rather than as a program interrupted by advertisements. (p. 66-67; emphasis added)

Page 18: Education and the social web promise or peril

BUT...

• the relationship between content and advertising is subtle and insidious

• It is made through sequence, rhythm and flow• So: Even though Facebook or Google, unlike

television, do not control content, the relationship is more nuanced

• informational design, architecture, and algorithm.

Page 19: Education and the social web promise or peril

Architecture of “Conviviality”• expansion of inter-

connections between users

• encourages the disclosure of concerns of favourable interest to those already in relation

• facilitates the expression of likes and invitations

• foregrounds every new friendship and connection

• than discretion and selectivity

• Articulating internal dissent and difference, articluating differences

• Expressing dislikes and disinclinations, and the reasons for them

• suppressing news of severance and deletion

Page 20: Education and the social web promise or peril

Algorithms of Conviviality• Registering an absence, observing an omission or being

faced with exclusion in general: these are avoided through myriad and careful design decisions: algorithms for selecting likely candidate friends, for identifying friends in need of further connections, and for featuring appropriate items “liked” by others.

• At the same time, any of these calculated processes of selection, identification and foregrounding also necessarily involves exclusion, suppression and elimination of other possibilities. However, these “negative” processes are relegated to the software behind the system, and are not readily accessible to users.

Page 21: Education and the social web promise or peril

What’s not to Like?

• Imagine if Facebook users could not only choose to "Like" Coca-Cola, but were also provided the option to "Dislike" the brand. Would Facebook become a more appealing place for brands to spend their marketing budgets and ad dollars ... or a less appealing one? Now imagine that websites could add "Dislike" buttons to their pages.

Page 22: Education and the social web promise or peril

Separation, Differentiation as important

• The benefits of this “distributed cognition” are tapped inside the classroom when students work collaboratively on problems or projects, learning from each others’ insights, and clarifying their own thinking through articulation and argument (Vye et al., 1998; quoted in Branson et al, 2000).

• constructivist models of collaborative knowledge building (e.g., Scardamalia and Bereiter, 2006)

• communitarian models of collaborative inquiry (e.g., Garrison, 2005).

Page 23: Education and the social web promise or peril

Knowledge construction vs “gossip”

e.g., Dewey; Garrison, Anderson, Rourke

e.g. Lefebvre, The Great Fear of 1789

Page 24: Education and the social web promise or peril

In Summary...

• The architecture, algorithm and design of Facebook and social networks reflects interests of advertisers, not users (or educators)

• What is in the interest of educators is differentiation and articulation vs. connection and conviviality, “liking” and audience-products

• There may be ways of that conviviality can help education, but these have yet to be considered re: social networking.

Page 25: Education and the social web promise or peril

Conclusion

“You are not Facebook’s customer. You are the product that they sell to their real customers — advertisers. Forget this at your peril” (Greenberg)“This simple reality underlies almost all considerations having to do with these tools, whether we’re talking about the persistence of online resources, the ownership of personal data, or whose interests will be served as these online environments continue to evolve. To use these tools is to reinforce, however indirectly, the ‘advertised life,’ the incursion of commoditization ever deeper into human thought and interaction.” (Lamb & Groom)

Page 26: Education and the social web promise or peril

Educational Television“Unable to bid for the skills and talents of commercial media specialists and masters of the communication process, educational television has [maintained a] dull system of [classroom] pedagogy handed down intact from Rabbinical times. It has been transmitted to viewers without any recognition that many ...find dogfood and soap commercials more attractive and stimulating.” (15, 16).

Page 27: Education and the social web promise or peril

• Mind arose out of existence, as an organ for keeping alive. In reflecting existence, however, it becomes at the same time something else. The existent negates itself as thought upon itself. Such negation is mind's element.