Top Banner
Chris Baugh [email protected] ~ 757.715.0919 mobile ~ 215.923.4961 home ~ Philadelphia, PA Objective Bring a pragmatic and enthusiastic approach to the development, management and analysis of educational data. Professional Experience 2010 Current School District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Development Coordinator - Office of Accountability, Assessment & Performance Targets Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Maintain and monitor assessment programs, ensuring data quality in coordination with the Offices of Educational Technology and Information Technology and outside vendors and agencies, including counterparts in the Pennsylvania Department of Education, SchoolNet, CTB/McGraw-Hill and the Data Recognition Corporation, publishers of the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA). · Author reports on assessment performance, student achievement and other core accountability indicators, including analysis of Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for several audiences, such as central offices, schools, regions, state and local governments, media and general public. · Develop and maintain accountability and assessment technologies for use in data reporting, data processing, and data utilization; MS-SQL, Access, Excel, SPSS. · Provide staff leadership, professional development and expertise in support of district projects between multiple district offices as well as with outside agencies. Key Accomplishments · Developed PSSA Data Visualization system to improve accuracy of PSSA data reporting and enrich the analysis of multiple datasets by leveraging lightweight, industry- standard information technologies for use in the educational management environment. · Principle architect and project manager for the COMPSTAT reporting system, which allowed the Office of School Safety (OSS) to improve the accuracy of key school climate indices; reduced the amount of time spent on-task by OSS staff tasked with producing routine executive-level reports from several days to a matter of minutes. · Worked in partnership with the Superintendent's office and City of Philadelphia technical offices to develop the analytic systems used to identify schools for conversion to the Renaissance turn-around model using state, local and city datasets; the resulting report was presented to C-level staff for finalization and adoption. · Lead author and principle investigator for the district's response to allegations of testing irregularities that took place in the administration of the 2009 PSSA test; developed an analytical model that further refined existing data analysis from the testing vendor and produced actionable findings for future investigations into testing irregularity.
25
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Educ data specialist work samples

Chris Baugh [email protected] ~ 757.715.0919 mobile ~ 215.923.4961 home ~ Philadelphia, PA Objective

Bring a pragmatic and enthusiastic approach to the development, management and analysis of educational data.

Professional Experience

2010 – Current School District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Development Coordinator - Office of Accountability, Assessment & Performance Targets

Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Maintain and monitor assessment programs, ensuring data quality in coordination with the Offices of Educational Technology and Information Technology and outside vendors and agencies, including counterparts in the Pennsylvania Department of Education, SchoolNet, CTB/McGraw-Hill and the Data Recognition Corporation, publishers of the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA). · Author reports on assessment performance, student achievement and other core accountability indicators, including analysis of Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for several audiences, such as central offices, schools, regions, state and local governments, media and general public. · Develop and maintain accountability and assessment technologies for use in data reporting, data processing, and data utilization; MS-SQL, Access, Excel, SPSS. · Provide staff leadership, professional development and expertise in support of district projects between multiple district offices as well as with outside agencies.

Key Accomplishments · Developed PSSA Data Visualization system to improve accuracy of PSSA data reporting and enrich the analysis of multiple datasets by leveraging lightweight, industry-standard information technologies for use in the educational management environment. · Principle architect and project manager for the COMPSTAT reporting system, which allowed the Office of School Safety (OSS) to improve the accuracy of key school climate indices; reduced the amount of time spent on-task by OSS staff tasked with producing routine executive-level reports from several days to a matter of minutes. · Worked in partnership with the Superintendent's office and City of Philadelphia technical offices to develop the analytic systems used to identify schools for conversion to the Renaissance turn-around model using state, local and city datasets; the resulting report was presented to C-level staff for finalization and adoption. · Lead author and principle investigator for the district's response to allegations of testing irregularities that took place in the administration of the 2009 PSSA test; developed an analytical model that further refined existing data analysis from the testing vendor and produced actionable findings for future investigations into testing irregularity.

Page 2: Educ data specialist work samples

2008 – 2009 PA Dept. of Education/Delaware County Intermediate Unit, PA

Educational Technology Coordinator, School Improvement Project

Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Coordinate with School Improvement team to support technical efforts on the grant-funded Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) contract; to include developing data analysis resources and delivery of key data reports to multiple stakeholders. · Coordinate data sharing projects with PDE Bureau of Accountability and Assessment and PDE contractors, to include IU13-PVAAS team and SAS Business Analytics. · Design and maintain assessment reporting systems on NCLB data metrics; Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS). Key Accomplishments · Served as the technical representative on several state-level committees related to Accountability, Assessment, and Data Reporting. · Authored professional development and online training supports for the 1000+ school-teams using the Getting Results school improvement model; to include several on-demand training videos, dynamic data tools, and structured organization of communication & training materials. 2007 – 2008 Suffolk Public Schools, Suffolk, VA

Supervisor of Technology, Information Services & Systems

2000 - 2007 Suffolk Public Schools, Suffolk, VA

Technology Integrator, Information Services & Systems

Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Coordinate with departmental administrators to meet information services and support needs for 21 schools and 3 district offices; to include daily information services operations, student information systems, educational research, and strategic planning. · Administer accountability systems for local, state and federal reporting. · Develop and manage technical aspects of the local assessment systems, to include instrument development, assessment delivery, and performance reporting systems. · Supervise the Information Services technical team within the district Technology Center; responsible for coordinating tier 1 to 3 support and training for multiple systems involving 700+ staff and 15,000+ students. · Coordinate with administration in the design, analysis and delivery of student performance data to multiple stakeholders; to include executive summaries and the public. · Participate in strategic planning; projects include division-wide online assessment for NCLB accountability, reporting systems for data-driven decision making, payroll and human resources application automation, web-based teacher gradebooks, online student transcripts/course requests.

Page 3: Educ data specialist work samples

· Manage technology integration projects between district and vendors while reporting progress directly to Director of Technology and district executive team. Key Accomplishments · Created an online state-standards assessment system that encompassed measuring student achievement in real-time and reporting performance data for parents, teachers, principals and central office staff for the purpose of targeted remediation, instructional and curricular adjustment. The SOLO system (Standards Of Learning Online) reduced the district's assessment cycles from 1 semester to 1 week while improving the overall quality of the data and instructional decision-making. · Created a data warehouse that integrated district data from multiple sources into a single reporting suite. The result of blending student performance data and demographic data within the larger context of our organizational data systems (NCLB-funded programs, special education, transportation, guidance & safety office) gave administrators access to reporting that supported their decision-making and could be incorporated into single-year and multi-year studies. · Personally developed, implemented, trained and supported several core organizational intranet applications to replace time-consuming manual procedures. Noticeable gains in data accuracy were made with shorter processing time and improved accountability. Technical Skills

Enterprise-Level Information Systems: Student Information Systems (including eSchoolPlus, Pentamation, SASI, ACHIEVE), Online Gradebook-Report Card (including GradeSpeed), Employee Services Intranet Portal, Educational Data Reporting Systems (including SchoolNet), experience with Extract,Transform,Load (ETL) and Quality Assurance (QA) tasks

Training & Productivity Applications: Adobe Acrobat/InDesign, Camtasia, Elluminate

Data Management, Reporting & Analysis: MS-SQL Server, MS Access, SPSS, Cognos, Microsoft Sharepoint Services

Web Coding & Scripting: ASP/ADO, XML/AJAX (jquery), Javascript, CSS, Visual Basic for Applications

Infrastructure: MS Server 2008, Internet Information Server 6.0+, Active Directory

Education

1998 – 2000 Virginia Polytechnic Institute

M.A. Ed. Educational & Instructional Technology/Instructional System Design

Lead Database Developer/Graduate Research Assistant – Center for Assessment, Evaluation and Educational Programming (CAEEP)

1996 – 2000 Virginia Polytechnic Institute

M.A. English Literature and Language

1991 – 1995 Virginia Polytechnic Institute

B.A. Liberal Arts: English/History

Page 4: Educ data specialist work samples

Professional Awards

Awarded 2007 – Virginia Educational Technology Leader of the Year, Region II

Professional Presentations

2007 - Educational Technology Leadership Conference

2007 - Virginia School Boards Association

2006 - Virginia Association of School Business Officials

2005 - Virginia Society for Technology Education

2004 - National Center for Educational Statistics Management Information Systems

Conference

Page 5: Educ data specialist work samples

184 167

Math Reading Math Reading55.7% 57.3% 79.1% 60.9%

Percent Adv/Prof

NORTHEAST HS MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

Percent Adv/Prof

<-- Select Schools to Compare-->

55.7% 57.3%

79.1%

60.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Math Reading

Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient

NORTHEAST HS MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

Page 6: Educ data specialist work samples

196 167

Math Reading Math Reading38.5% 48.5% 79.1% 60.9%

Percent Adv/Prof

PAUL ROBESON HS FOR MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

Percent Adv/Prof

<-- Select Schools to Compare-->

38.5%

48.5%

79.1%

60.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Math Reading

Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient

PAUL ROBESON HS FOR MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

Page 7: Educ data specialist work samples

7 167

Math Reading Math Reading22.1% 17.7% 79.1% 60.9%

Percent Adv/Prof

ALCORN JAMES SCH MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

Percent Adv/Prof

<-- Select Schools to Compare-->

22.1% 17.7%

79.1%

60.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Math Reading

Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient

ALCORN JAMES SCH MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

Page 8: Educ data specialist work samples

% At/Above

Proficient

Increase/

Decrease

from Last

Year Result

% At/Above

Proficient

Increase/

Decrease

from Last

Year Result % Tested Result % Tested Result

2011 Goals:

Students Overall 70.0 14.5 R 78.6 1.5 P - - - -

White non-Hispanic - - - -

Black/African American non-Hispanic 68.0 12.2 R 78.1 0.2 P - - - -

Latino/Hispanic - - - -

Asian/Pacific Islander 85.7 28.0 P 92.9 8.3 P - - - -

Multi-racial/ethnic - - - -

IEP-Special Education 31.0 15.6 R 44.8 29.4 R - - - -

English Language Learners - - - -

Economically Disadvantaged 70.0 14.4 R 78.6 1.4 P - - - -

*Participation not calculated at this time

Legend

P Group met measure

R Group met target using Safe Harbor

O Group did not meet measure

95%

Select a school using the menu below

Joseph W. Catharine School Preliminary AYP Performance

Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model

or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in

determining a school's AYP Status

Reading Math

Academic Performance Participation*

Reading Math

72% 67% 95%

Page 9: Educ data specialist work samples

% At/Above

Proficient

Increase/

Decrease

from Last

Year Result

% At/Above

Proficient

Increase/

Decrease

from Last

Year Result % Tested Result % Tested Result

2011 Goals:

Students Overall 71.3 -0.8 O 82.5 -5.1 P - - - -

White non-Hispanic 70.8 -0.5 O 84.7 -2.8 P - - - -

Black/African American non-Hispanic 70.2 0.2 O 68.4 -11.6 O - - - -

Latino/Hispanic 70.5 1.3 O 78.7 -12.1 P - - - -

Asian/Pacific Islander 71.1 -13.7 O 86.8 -10.2 P - - - -

Multi-racial/ethnic - - - -

IEP-Special Education 29.8 -7.5 O 67.0 -9.4 O - - - -

English Language Learners 52.4 52.4 R 57.1 57.1 R - - - -

Economically Disadvantaged 67.3 -0.9 O 81.5 -2.6 P - - - -

*Participation not calculated at this time

Legend

P Group met measure

R Group met target using Safe Harbor

O Group did not meet measure

95%

Select a school using the menu below

Stephen Decatur School Preliminary AYP Performance

Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model

or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in

determining a school's AYP Status

Reading Math

Academic Performance Participation*

Reading Math

72% 67% 95%

Page 10: Educ data specialist work samples

% At/Above

Proficient

Increase/

Decrease

from Last

Year Result

% At/Above

Proficient

Increase/

Decrease

from Last

Year Result % Tested Result % Tested Result

2011 Goals:

Students Overall 72.7 14.9 P 82.0 13.9 P - - - -

White non-Hispanic - - - -

Black/African American non-Hispanic 69.7 10.7 R 80.9 15.9 P - - - -

Latino/Hispanic 88.0 38.0 P 92.0 21.2 P - - - -

Asian/Pacific Islander - - - -

Multi-racial/ethnic - - - -

IEP-Special Education 66.7 38.6 R 83.3 17.7 P - - - -

English Language Learners - - - -

Economically Disadvantaged 72.7 13.9 P 82.0 13.6 P - - - -

*Participation not calculated at this time

Legend

P Group met measure

R Group met target using Safe Harbor

O Group did not meet measure

95%

Select a school using the menu below

George W. Nebinger School Preliminary AYP Performance

Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model

or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in

determining a school's AYP Status

Reading Math

Academic Performance Participation*

Reading Math

72% 67% 95%

Page 11: Educ data specialist work samples

1 <--- Change Academic Division using the menu

Academic

Division School Name

Delegations

Sent

EH36E

Sent

Residency

Sent

Cases Sent

Total

Delegations

Received

EH36E

Received

Residency

Received

Cases Received

Total

Oct.2010 to

May 2011

Total Cases

AD 1 Audenried Shs 0 5 1 6 1 0 0 1 7

AD 1 Carroll Charles Sch 0 2 3 5 0 1 0 1 6

AD 1 Douglas Stephen A Sch 0 8 0 8 0 3 0 3 11

AD 1 Edison Hs - Fareira Skills 7 24 3 34 2 7 3 12 46

AD 1 Fels Samuel Hs 6 36 11 53 8 4 18 30 83

AD 1 Fitzsimons Thomas Academy 0 8 0 8 0 2 0 2 10

AD 1 Frankford Hs 2 53 2 57 3 6 4 13 70

AD 1 Franklin Benjamin Hs 2 15 1 18 1 4 0 5 23

AD 1 Furness Horace Hs 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 4

AD 1 George Washington Hs 2 4 1 7 1 4 2 7 14

AD 1 Germantown Hs 3 18 1 22 2 3 0 5 27

AD 1 Gratz Simon Hs 2 22 0 24 2 3 2 7 31

AD 1 John Bartram Hs 0 8 0 8 2 2 0 4 12

Total Cases 66 370 94 524 53 99 86 222 740

57 30

54 24

53 17

34 15

33 13

31 13

29 12

28 10

26 9

24 7

22 7

21 7

18 6

18 5

23 19

Rhodes E W Academy

Franklin Benjamin Hs

Gratz Simon Hs

Lamberton Robert Hs

Germantown Hs

Gratz Simon Hs

Germantown Hs

Kensington Intl Business Finance

George Washington Hs

Strawberry Mansion Hs

Olney Hs East-705

Sayre William L Ms

Olney Hs West-704

King Martin Luther Hs

Edison Hs - Fareira Skills

Sayre William L Ms

King Martin Luther Hs

Edison Hs - Fareira Skills

Overbrook Hs

Overbrook Hs

Olney Hs West-704

Frankford Hs

Strawberry Mansion Hs

Total Schools on Sending List Total Schools on Receiving List

ONISS - Reporting on Delegations, Residency and Extenuating Circumstances Requests 10/2010 - 5/2011

Ranked Schools Sending 4 or More Students Ranked Schools Receiving 4 or More Students

Frankford Hs

Lincoln Abraham Hs

Fels Samuel Hs

Lincoln Abraham Hs

Fels Samuel Hs

15%

63%

23%

Cases by Type

Delegation

EH36E

Residency

0

100

200

300

400

Sent Received

Delegation EH36E Residency

Page 12: Educ data specialist work samples

1 <--- Change Academic Division using the menu

Academic

Division School Name

Delegations

Sent

EH36E

Sent

Residency

Sent

Cases Sent

Total

Delegations

Received

EH36E

Received

Residency

Received

Cases Received

Total

Oct.2010 to

May 2011

Total Cases

AD 6 Allen Ethan Sch 1 15 4 20 2 1 5 8 28

AD 6 Brown Joseph H Sch 0 3 0 3 0 1 2 3 6

AD 6 Carnell Laura H Sch 2 16 10 28 1 2 7 10 38

AD 6 Comly Watson Sch 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2

AD 6 Creighton Thomas Sch 0 9 0 9 0 3 1 4 13

AD 6 Disston Hamilton Sch 1 9 16 26 0 3 10 13 39

AD 6 Edmunds Henry R Sch 2 16 15 33 2 5 0 8 41

AD 6 Fitzpatrick Aloysius 3 2 0 5 1 0 0 1 6

AD 6 Forrest Edwin Sch 0 4 3 7 0 1 2 3 10

AD 6 Frank Anne Sch 5 6 1 12 1 0 0 1 13

AD 6 Franklin Benjamin 0 4 3 7 0 4 3 7 14

AD 6 Greenberg Joseph Sch 0 1 7 8 0 3 2 5 13

AD 6 Hancock John Sch 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 4

Total Cases 28 161 187 368 23 78 100 186 548

37 31

33 14

31 13

28 12

26 11

22 10

22 9

20 8

12 8

12 8

12 7

12 6

10 5

10 4

24 14

Ziegler William H Sch

Hopkinson Francis Sch

Rhawnhurst Sch

Greenberg Joseph Sch

Creighton Thomas Sch

Frank Anne Sch

Sullivan James J Sch

Edmunds Henry R Sch

Juniata Park Academy

Franklin Benjamin

Webster John H Sch

Spruance Gilbert Sch

Allen Ethan Sch

Carnell Laura H Sch

Lawton Henry W Sch

Allen Ethan Sch

Lawton Henry W Sch

Carnell Laura H Sch

Disston Hamilton Sch

Disston Hamilton Sch

Sheridan Philip H Sc

Webster John H Sch

Mayfair Sch

Total Schools on Sending List Total Schools on Receiving List

ONISS - Reporting on Delegations, Residency and Extenuating Circumstances Requests 10/2010 - 5/2011

Ranked Schools Sending 4 or More Students Ranked Schools Receiving 4 or More Students

Juniata Park Academy

Edmunds Henry R Sch

Ziegler William H Sch

Spruance Gilbert Sch

Sheridan Philip H Sc

7%

42% 51%

Cases by Type

Delegation

EH36E

Residency

0

50

100

150

200

Sent Received

Delegation EH36E Residency

Page 13: Educ data specialist work samples

School <<< Select your School Here

Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data

Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% -

A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% -

A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% -

B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% -

B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% -

B.3 - - - - - - -

C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% -

C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - -

C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% -

D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% -

D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% -

D.3 - - - - 66% - -

D.4 - - - - - 85% -

E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% -

E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - -

E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% -

E.4 - - - - 63% 79% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

ReadingGrade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% -

A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% -

A.3 - - - - - - -

B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% -

B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% -

B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*

chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart

*Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

A.1

A.2

A.3

B.1

B.2

B.3

C.1

C.2

C.3D.1

D.2

D.3

D.4

E.1

E.2

E.3

E.4

Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math

6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math

Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown

Page 14: Educ data specialist work samples

School <<< Select your School Here

Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data

Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% -

A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% -

A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% -

B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% -

B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% -

B.3 - - - - - - -

C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% -

C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - -

C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% -

D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% -

D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% -

D.3 - - - - 66% - -

D.4 - - - - - 85% -

E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% -

E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - -

E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% -

E.4 - - - - 63% 79% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

ReadingGrade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% -

A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% -

A.3 - - - - - - -

B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% -

B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% -

B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*

chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart

*Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

A.1

A.2

A.3

B.1

B.2

B.3

C.1

C.2

C.3D.1

D.2

D.3

D.4

E.1

E.2

E.3

E.4

Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math

6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math

Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown

Page 15: Educ data specialist work samples

School <<< Select your School Here

Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data

Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% -

A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% -

A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% -

B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% -

B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% -

B.3 - - - - - - -

C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% -

C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - -

C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% -

D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% -

D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% -

D.3 - - - - 66% - -

D.4 - - - - - 85% -

E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% -

E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - -

E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% -

E.4 - - - - 63% 79% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

ReadingGrade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% -

A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% -

A.3 - - - - - - -

B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% -

B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% -

B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*

chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart

*Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

A.1

A.2

A.3

B.1

B.2

B.3

C.1

C.2

C.3D.1

D.2

D.3

D.4

E.1

E.2

E.3

E.4

Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math

6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math

Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown

Page 16: Educ data specialist work samples

School <<< Select your School Here

Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data

Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% -

A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% -

A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% -

B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% -

B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% -

B.3 - - - - - - -

C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% -

C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - -

C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% -

D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% -

D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% -

D.3 - - - - 66% - -

D.4 - - - - - 85% -

E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% -

E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - -

E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% -

E.4 - - - - 63% 79% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

ReadingGrade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11

A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% -

A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% -

A.3 - - - - - - -

B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% -

B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% -

B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% -

Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 -

Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*

chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart

*Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

A.1

A.2

A.3

B.1

B.2

B.3

C.1

C.2

C.3D.1

D.2

D.3

D.4

E.1

E.2

E.3

E.4

Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math

6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math

Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown

Page 17: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 18: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 19: Educ data specialist work samples

OSCAR Student Answer Sheet Building: 1892Test Geometry Quarterly Assessment #1

Student E____ B____ User ID 116975Instructor Jurisson Pd.5/6 Passcode 38

1 26 51 76

2 27 52 77

3 28 53 78

4 29 54 79

5 30 55 80

6 31 56 81

7 32 57 82

8 33 58 83

9 34 59 84

10 35 60 85

11 36 61 86

12 37 62 87

13 38 63 88

14 39 64 89

15 40 65 90

16 41 66 91

17 42 67 92

18 43 68 93

19 44 69 94

20 45 70 95

21 46 71 96

22 47 72 97

23 48 73 98

24 49 74 99

25 50 75 100

Page 20: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 21: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 22: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 23: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 24: Educ data specialist work samples
Page 25: Educ data specialist work samples

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2

Average Score:67% Pass Rate:47%

(Passing 97 / Tested 205) Cut Score: 70% or better

Test Instructor Bell Pass% Passing Total

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Jurisson 5/6 56 9 16

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Keaton 1/2 25 4 16

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Keaton 3/4 25 4 16

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Kileen 2 71 15 21

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Kileen 4/5 43 7 16

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Lorgen 2/3 18 4 22

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Lorgen 7/8 42 9 21

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Suggs 1 71 10 14

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Suggs 4 70 12 17

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Suggs 6/7 60 12 20

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Volante 1 50 8 16

Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Volante 4 30 3 10

Page 1 of 1OSCAR | School Performance Report

5/5/2009http://www.pasip.org/oscar/testanalyzer_solsummary_scoping_MLPie_DirectWrite.asp?TI...