• 1 Edmund G, Brown Jr., STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY DIVISION HEADQUARTERS RESOURCES BUILDING, ROOM 1341 1416 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 District Offices: LOS ANGELES Junipero Serra Bldg., Rm. 1065 107 South Brood way 90012 W. Darwin Myers Contra Costa County Planning Department SACRAMENTO Resources Bldg., Rm. l lS 1416 Ninth: Street 95814 County Administration Building, Horth Wing P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 9lt553 Dear Mr. Myers: SAN FRANCISCO Ferry Building 94111 (lt15) 557-0li13 July 8, 1976 Governor A?-.242 Qi We are placing on open file the following report, reviewed and submitted for the City of Concord In compliance with the Alqulst- Prlolo Special Studies Zones Act: Report to James J, Campbell on geologic and seismic hazard Investigation for Concord self-service station, Concord; by Engeo, lne., June 11t, 1976. EWH/mkr cc: Gary Bonfiglio, City of Concord A-P fl le,__-- Sincerely yours, EARL \I, HART Office of the State Geologist RG lt62 CEG 935
32
Embed
Edmund G, Brown Jr., Qigmw.consrv.ca.gov/SHP/APSI_SiteInvestigationReports_OCR/APSI_0… · 14/06/1976 · • 1 edmund g, brown jr., state of california-the resources agency department
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
• 1
Edmund G, Brown Jr., STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY DIVISION HEADQUARTERS RESOURCES BUILDING, ROOM 1341
1416 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
District Offices: LOS ANGELES
Junipero Serra Bldg., Rm. 1065 107 South Brood way 90012
W. Darwin Myers Contra Costa County Planning Department
SACRAMENTO Resources Bldg., Rm. l lS 1416 Ninth: Street 95814
County Administration Building, Horth Wing P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 9lt553
Dear Mr. Myers:
SAN FRANCISCO
Ferry Building 94111
(lt15) 557-0li13
July 8, 1976
~~' Governor
A?-.242 Qi
We are placing on open file the following report, reviewed and submitted for the City of Concord In compliance with the AlqulstPrlolo Special Studies Zones Act:
Report to James J, Campbell on geologic and seismic hazard Investigation for Concord self-service station, Concord; by Engeo, lne., June 11t, 1976.
EWH/mkr
cc: Gary Bonfiglio, City of Concord A-P fl le,__--
Sincerely yours,
EARL \I, HART Office of the State Geologist RG lt62 CEG 935
Contra Costa County /IP-24-2
r 'I Planning Commission Members
Andrew H. Young Alamo ~Chairman
William L. Milano Pittsburg - Vice.Chairman Donald E. Anderson Moraga
Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planning Albert R. Compaglia Martinez
Phone: 372-2024
July 6, 1976
Mr. Gary Bonfiglio City of Concord Planning Department 1950 Parkside Drive Concord, California 911519
Dear Gary,
Richard J. Jeha El Sobrante Jack Stoddard Richmond William V. Walton 111 Pleasant Hill
Pursuant to your request I reviewed the geologic report submitted by the applicant for the proposed self-service gasoline station, southeast corner cif Market Street an<l Concord Avenue. The study area is a rectangular-shaped parcel with approximately 100 feet of frontage on the south side of Concord Avenue and 130 feet on the east side of Market Street.
The geologic report was prepared by ENGEO and titled "Concord Self-Service Station, Concord, California, Geologic and Seismic Hazards Investigation" (report dated June 14, 1976). The proposed new construction is to consist of a small cashier's booth and underground tanks for the storage of gasoline.
Adequacy of Geology Report
Pursuant to the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Act a geologic study was conducted on the site of a proposed self-service gasoline station (project area identified in Figure 7 of the ENGEO report). The study was performed under the supervision of a geologist registered in the State of California and the primary conclusion of the resulting report is that there is no evidence of an active fault trace passing through the site. The report goes on to indicate that available off-site surface information suggests that the main trace of the Concord fault passes approximately 180 feet northeast of the site (see Figure 4 of the ENGEO report). I have carefully reviewed the report as well as other pertinent mapping from nearby areas. The preponderance of evidence, particularly the on-site trenching done by the consultant support the conclusion that the site is free of evidence of active faulting.
There were anomalous features in the northeast portion of the trench. However, there was no evidence of shearing or definite indications of active faulting. Nevertheless, the consultant has recommended a setback and I concur with this recommendation. It is my opinion that the report satisfies the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Act.
, Gary Bonfiglio Page 2 July 6, 1976
•
Building Design Criteria
,
The geologic report recommends that due to the proximity of the site to the active Concord fault, the seismic design criteria should exceed code minimums (see page 15, recommendation 115 of the ENGEO report). I fully support this recommendation. The Building Inspection Department should review building plans in the light of this recommendation.
If you have any questions on the report or my comments, please contact me at 372-2031. I will submit a copy of the geologic report, along with this letter review to Mr. Earl W. Hart of the California Division of Mines and Geology.
WDM:jyl
cc: Robert Sharpe / Earl W. Hart v William Wigginton
•
Sincerely yours,
Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning
'\l\j ~ '1:!...~ W. Darwin Myers.~\. Planning Geologist RG 3164, EG 946
The p1;rDose of this study is to deterrr:ine the poten"':ial for surface
fa11l t rupture wit"'. in or in the negr vicinity of the Dronosed site.
This study is in accorde.nce with the Suggested Guidelines for Eval
ua+: ina: the Hazard of Surface Fa1Jl t ::tupture, Note No. 49, published
by the California Di vis ion of !lines and Geology (October 19 75, Re
ference 4). These '1;Uideline~ sua:irest thei procedures and report for
~at needed to co~ply with thJ Alauist-Prialo Studies Zone Act of
1972. This la1·r directed the State '.}eolo.o:ist to delineate special
studies zones for California. Within these zones are napped poten-
tlally active R.vid active geoloo:ic f8,Ult traces. ':'he proposed site
is located ;·1i thin such a zone enco'.l:nassing the :capped trqces of the
Concord Fault (Fig;ure 1).
Our ini ti8.l Pha,se consisted of locating the '.'learest !::8DPed Concord
?a1J.l t t"."ace e.nd associated seconc.ary or cranchino; fault traces in
the vici'.'lity of the site. :re have Rlso revie11ed the literature data
~ertaining to the recency of activity along the Concord Fault. In
crr"Jdi ti0n to rP,1_,.ie1·1ing; t:his oerti.nent li ::er8.ture, ~'le conducted field
o'c~Prv .. P.tio!'ls ot' cl.1.rb o.ffset g_nd other fai.1lt creep featu_res near th_e
site.
·T·he sec0·'.ld p"1qse of Ollr i:ivesti':!'a+:ioY: consisti?r1 of t':LP interpretation
of 0.e"'."i"<l nYioto"raphs to detect if faul t-relat"ed toooo;raphy, vegeta-
EN GEO INCORPORATED
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
N6-0740-B2
tional chg,,nrz:es, soil tonal co~~rP._sts nn<l lin~8.r features ( "linear.:!ents")
of Possible fault ori<Zi"l do exist- neqr the site.
Our third u>;ase included a 1°rnbs1J_rface explorqtion to Demit a detailed
8."ld direst observ"_+:ion of cont;in'lnusly exnosed geolo;:i;ic units xl'!ich
7lere then C9.".'efully loi:i;g:ed.
Ho geoohysical TI'ethods ·-;-ere used for this investigation because site
co"lditions were not favorable for their use due to existing facil-
ities and traffic.
B. Geologic Setting
To provide the background data and to follow guideline procedures,
Yle are giving the Geolo~ic Set tine; 1;rerbatiI!' fror:. the City of Co'.'."lcord
SeisTI'iC Safety Elei;:ent and other pertinent excerpts.
"Concord is loceted in an -".lluvial valley fo?T:ed by strear:'.s draining fro!I' the countains of the Diablo Ranire. Eastern Concord is dr1:1ined by the noTthwesterly flnwing 1-:t. Diablo Creek, while the western D1:1r+-. of the City is dr8.ined by Walnut Creek and its tributar.v, Pine Creek. fl. fourth stream, Galindo Creek, flows 'iestWEffd along the northeast side of Lin:e RVlo:e. These creeks have denosited several hundred feet of sediTr.ents on top of the bedrock to forl!' the valley floor, and firn hedrock at the surface is limited to the 'hillside areas of the i;aval Wea,.,ons Station on the flanks of Vt. Zion.
Bedrock Materials
The oldPst rocks in the Conco:rd p·-ea arA the Eesozic intrusives (diabase) and Cretaceous sedi~entary rocks which are found on the flarks of l''t. Zion. In the recent geologic past, these rocks have bePn i_.,,_-.;rol"red i~ ~a.ssi1,re IandslidinftS, and it is likely th8.t the area continues to be unsta'.Jle at the present ~ime. Lanrlslides ~rea~er than one ~ile wide
Yotln~er !'oc1<:s ~re friunrl on I..i!!!e RirJ..qe a.nd in thP, F:s.stern pH rt of Concord. ·These ::_'er-:- iar~r roc 1->'s 8.r~ ~:ren Of"in."1_!1."t-ly shales, cl9_ys+-o'!.es, p._ne!_ SP..Y1Ct:::-tor1es r;'i'"ith associ...R_ted volc9.ri.ics. Since +:heir forra 4 ion 35 to SO pi_] 1 io"1 Y 0 8.TS arco in ':ocene tire, they have been extensively fnlrled and f?ul~ed. As a r"sult, steeDl:V di"1)in"' beds 9re c 0 !!:I"on. Hillsirie aI'eas urcderl8.in b;r t~.~s~ roclcs, 1---:-~rt:ic11l.?.~lJr those of the T1:a.r~{eley :'or:nation, 8re hic;hly susceptil:ole +:o landsliding. Failure is of+:en due to the presence of interbedded bentonic ( shri nk-s1:ell) clay s ee.r.-.s.
quaternary Deposits
S<0veral types of Qua'::er;iary deposits: are found in Concord. including silty alluviat gravels, st;iff clays and bay mud. These d<0Dosits range in
1
thickness fr:om 150 feet in Clayton to over 300 feet in the northern part of Concord. Silty gra.Yel deposits occur over less than 10 percent of the City and are frequently fminc as lo>•, northwest-trending rid:,-es on the valley floor. Most of Concord is covered by stiff Rlluvi9l cle.ys which are locslly silty or sandy. Clean, saturated sand lavers, where p~·esent within 15 feet of the gro'.i"id mirface, ac-e a ootential liouef8.Ctio".l hazard, and are '--:nown to exist in tre •·re stern :oart of Concord. Subsurface infortration for the eastern part of Concord is very sparse, and liquefiable sand lenses are urobably present, pa.rticula.rly alono:- Ht. Diab lo Creek.
Korth of Mallard Reservoir, the predocinant unit is bay cud. Bay "'nd is dark organic clay, is usually saturated, and iray contain peat and sand layers. ".'he presence of wet sandy layers sives tbe c2.y mud a high lic_uefaction poten+:ial, and ~he loose nat,ire of the sediments I".?.kes them highly corpressibl<0 a.n1 of low bearing:; stren;z:th.
The Concorc Fault
The Concord f'aul t is ir-por'cant to the City because the dal"aQ'.e caused during sn earthQUa1{e is generally concentrated within JO riles of the fault trace. It has been studied in detail by ~he U. s. Geolo;z:ical Survey and recent geologic investio:-ations suo:-gest that it is a steeply di n:'>i!lg reverse fault with the eastern side rovi!lg upward.
EN GEO INCORPORATED
I I I I I I I I I I-I I I I I ·I
I
N6-074C-~2
Other Faults
170 ct.her fa1J1ts 1-·1i+-.b ~\n0rNn eEtrthou2 1-\e r-otP!lti8.l exist 1-ii":;hin the City of Concord. The hills to the northeast and to the south are cut by a ff'l!!ber of faults, including the Walker Canyon, tcedanos, Clayton, and Kirker Fass Faults, but none of these have 'been shown to 'be active."
C. Site Description and Conditions
The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of
Concord Avenue and Harket Street (Figure 2). It is recta.Ylgular in
shape with 110 feet on Conco:rjd Ave".lue and,,130 feet on Narket Street. 1, I
At the time we conducted our ',trenching, the site was soil covered.
The site vras previously occupied by a >:ras station that was rerroved
about one year Pgo (1975).
l'Iethods of Investio:atlon
Literature and 1''.ap Review
R. V. Sharp re'realed evidence for right-lateral displace!'lent on the
Concord Fault (Reference 12; Figure 3). Various areas exhibiting
creep features such as offset curbs, en-ecr.elon P"-·rement fractures,
dis tressed tree lines, etc., served to delineate the r:8.in trace and
a.ssocia ted secon"ary or nr.Rnch ino: traces. BPrloorar, Long & Associates
in an investio:Rtio"l revealed. evide"lce of fault offset in exploratory
trenchln;z conducted on February 13, 14, 1974, within the LehI"er Olds-
!"Obile property at the corner of Fira \.'is':a Terrace and Concord Boul-
evard (Reference 1; Fi~ire 1). The location of this evidence co
l incided with the Concord Fault TI8in trace revealed by Sharp's
I ENGEO INCORPORATED
I I I I I I I I I 1~
I I I I I I I I I
N6-C740-B2
slio:'1.!"ent of offset anr1 col!:r:ressirmal waruing cur'is JO to 40 feet
north of !-1ira ' . ."ista 'Ierrf'lCe along Concord Boulevard.
In a soil investio-ation co"lduct.ed by ENGEO north of Concord Avenue
-9.nd west of Freeway "Lil), three tr"!nches located the rr.ain segn:ent of
the Co"lcord !<'ault (Reference 7; ?i>i;Ure 8). This trace is about 200
feet northeast of She.rp's ciueried fault trace (Reference 12; Figure
J}. The projection of t'iis trace n-eet:s wi+-h Sh8.rp's well-documented
main trace of the CoYJcord Fa.11lt in the city of Concord.
The prese'1t investio;ation is1, concerned with a site wrich is located I
1·-rest of the main segrr.ent trace of the Concord Fault (Reference 12).
Thus, of so!l'e concern to us, was the proximity and or projections
of the rapned seconrlary faults associated with the main Concord seg-
T:ient (Reference 12; Figure J). Based on evidence of a small com-
nression of railroad siding obtained by Sharp, 1973, a srr.all secondary
fault Point B TCBY be present 240 feet southwest of the site.
Air Photo Interpretation
Black a"ld '•-'l-:ite stereo aArial photo<rraphs of the site and its e•prirons
were studied to deterr.cine any evidence for an active fault on the pro-
perty ( Re::'erence 10, 11; Fi«ure 5). The aerial _choto"'."raphs were flown
on October 8, 1952, at a scale of 1 inch to approxi!l'.ately 1,667 feet.
The traces of recently ".c':ive fcults cal". generally be recognized on
9_e,...iP.l 0hoto7.ra:-hs bv contrasts in "'ITe;r;e"!:ation and soil types a.cross "' -- . _. v ,
the fault anrl by topo;i:raphic feat;ures such as scarps, troughs, notches
ENGEO INCORPORATED
I I I I I I I I I I: I I I I I I I I I
N6-C740-B2
in hillsi,,es, us,rallel rida:es, of·0 set dr2inP.Q'.e crwnnels, sg.g nonds and
closed deuressiol'ls. Our ''t1Jdy of the bl9.c1' and white aeriB.l 0hoto-
granhs did show evide"lce of lineations southeast and nor':hwest of the
site, trendinz N JOO W. The date, consisted of sag ponds, a low scarp
and a sharp tonal difference along a lineament. Our air photostudies
did not reveal any fault-related features crossing the site.
The photos did, however, show a s:irall northwest trending rise or ridge
that could be interpreted as• a fB.ult-related structure. The trend of
I this !".ore western linear feature crosses .Frel"ont Street just south
i of Co:'lcord Avenue Hnd then disanpe'l.rS to the north.
Northw.,st of the site, aerial photogranhs ( 1972, Figure 8) show a
distinct tonal contrast coincidina; with the ll'.ain tr9.ce of the Concord
Fault (Reference 11).
Geologic Reconnaissance - Surface Observations
The area in the vicinity of the site was examined for evidence of
recent faulting and fault creep along the suspected Concord segment
and 'l.ssociated secondary faults of the Concord Fault Trace (Reference
12). Beisinning at the intersection of Sunset and 11ira Vista Terrace
and exte'lcling to the intersection of Salvio and ~'ira Vista Terrace,
the fault trace is shm•n by offset curbs. This tyoe of displaceirent
occurs in a line JO to 40 feet northeast and p<trallel to ri'ira Vist:a
Terrace.
A diffet'C>l1Ce in elevation which is 8. orooable low fault scarp coincides
EN GEO INCORrORATED
I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I
N6-0'?40-B2
1tiith the ~lli'..\n~e:'Lt nf c1J-rb offs-sts a.nd a line of distressed ~rees
south of Willow :p0ss 1.oad. Prior to its rel"oval, asphalt pavement
ir.. 8.n aban0on.~rl ~8.S st~tiori_ at the cornP.r of I'1!ira \Tista TerrA.ce and
'-"ill ow P0.ss RoRd exhibited en-echelon crR.ckin« also co inc id i>;g; with
tche project fault trg,ce (Fio:ure 2). In "<ddition, the S'U'!e crg,cking
is occurring in the pRrkin.o; lot of the King Auction Store at the
intersection of Salvio anr1 Broqclway Stre.,,ts and distress is occurring
in a convalescent hospital building: astride the f,;rnlt trace between
Harrison and Central Streets, (Darwin Myers, Contra Costa County Geol-i J
I
oi:tist, Personal Co'."!"'.unica.tion). A projec,tion of this fault would I
apnroximately trend north of the intersection of Fremont Street and
. . Concord Avenue (Figure 2).
A recheck of the inforrcation supplied by Darwin Myers, indeed, re,realed
en-echelon left stennin,;i; cracks in a zone 1 to 1~ feet wide. These
cracks "re about 1/10 to 1/4 of an inch in width and are .generally
6 to 12 inches lonR: orientec1 flbout 20 to 40 deo;rees to the trend of the
ranped main fault trace. ~he fractured zone is approximately 150 feet
long whose northern term.inns is qpnroxi!'ls.tely 30 to 50 feet froTI the
northwest pronerty line of the King Auction Store which is 14 years
old.
Our off-site survey also included an attecpt to 1) locate evidence of
the seconi:g,ry faults nearest the site and 2) obtain any additional
evidence for faultin., in the vicinity of the site.
Where the fault (Point A, Fi=re 4) crosses Harriso:'.1 Street, we were
ENGEO INCORPORATED
I I I I I. I I I I II I I I I I I I I
N6-o740-B2
unable to confirm the off~et curbs of Sharp's 1973 findings. In
fact, th~re is np cnrb a+: this tiP'P O!'l t~e no"t"t:h~'iest sid_e of Harrison
be;z:innin« gt Sutter and c,Ytendin;;i; lCO to 120 feet ci.lona: Harrison. The
rest o!~ tl:e Ctlrbin~ sho-:-is no 0ffs2ts. T..-Ie v1ere 1.J.nable to f'i!1.d any
cree:o related f"!atures where the fault (Point A, Figure 4) crosses
13roacway Street. There are sone left lateral curb offsets on the
southeastern side of California Street about 175 feet north of Broad-
way. In our opinion, these offsets are not related to fault creep
but probably to differential. settle:cent arid minor translational move-1
ment. The fault (Point B, Figure 4) as mapped is short and presumably
its location was based on the compression of the railroad siding.
He were unable to confirn this creep feature and a search along a
southeastern projection of lts trace did not reveal any features sug-
gestlve of creen.
The reconnaissance close to the site was unable to confirn Sharp's
small-ri;;i;ht lateral curb offset on Concord Avenue east of Market
Street (Figure J). There are ~any new patches of curb and sidewalk
from when the ><;as stat.ion and driveways were re'l'_o•red. A possible
sli<rht bow of the curbline could be seen at the northeast corner of
the site and further to the east. A building on Fre=ont about 50 feet
south of Concord Avenue showed si;:,;ns of stress in the form of crack-
lng in the foundation le8.din;;c in to the interior (Figure 2). Accord-
ing to the owner, the building is at least fourty years of age.
Aoproxicately 150 feet north of the intersection of Fre'l'ont Street
and Concord Ave!lue, a spring extqts which, according; to the owner.
(10) Pacific Resources, Inc., 1952, Aerial Photographs AV-104-04-11 and AV-104-c4-12.
(11) Real Estate Atlas of Contra Costa County, California, 1973.
(12) Sharp, R.V., 1973. "Map Showing; Recent Tectonic Movement on the Concord Fault, Contra Costa and Solano Counties, California", U.S. GeoloQ;ical Survey, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-505.
(13) Seed, H.B., and I.JV'. Idriss, Septel'lber, 1971, "Sin:olified Procedure for Evaluatina: Soil Liquefaction Potential", .Journal of the Soil }'echanics and ·Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SM9, ProceecUngs Paper 8371, :op. 1249 - 1273.
CRlifornia Division of Fines an~ Geolo~y, July, 1974
Cali for:'lia Cor!trR Costa Co.
:"'ault Loca+:ed in ~rencr._ ~y Be!'lo~ail:", Lnn_~ & Asqoei·~.t;:.s, 3-15-74
ENGE·o self-service station site Concord, California
I N CO R p O R AT E D 1-------,,-_,_.,,..sE:;..::r'=s i:,-,n,:.,:.c-,-.cH::::cA;::cZA=--.,.B..-D_z_o_:rn ____ ---t ~S~C~A-'-L_E~_1~"-=~2_c_·o_c_,_· ........ ~~JOB ENGINEEl=IS ANO GEOLOGISTS
CONSULTANTS IN THE APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES DATE June, 197 NO. IJ6-074C-B2
FIGURE NO.
1
2150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 PHONE (415) 548-8800
I I I I I I I I I
•• I I I I I I I I 1
CoY\cord Fault Trace
1) Offset Curb 2) Crack in Pavement
(PR Vi n;:i: rer' 01red) 3) ?Ernl t Scqrn 4) En-echelon'Left
Steppi~~ Fractures 5) Distress in Hoscital 6) Artesian Snrin~· 7) Crac'.-<:ino: in
Pou!lda t ion 8) Bmr i.n Curb Site Creep Features Veri fled by E'.~GEO
EN GEO
~--0 00 -------
'l:::J0 [)?6
Qolf-Q 0~~~c~ 9~a~1o~ Site Concord, California
SURFACE FAULT ?EATURES CONCORD FAULT
INCORPORATEDf------c-,,--___,~~-,.-~--c~~~ SCALE 1 "= 20 C'' JOB ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
CONSUL TAN TS JN THE APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES
i-:.-:~:.:;;....~~~~.,..,,...~--1
DATE uune, ~7 b NO. N6-074C-B2
FIGURE NO.
2
2150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE (415) 548-8800
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
EN GEO Self-Service st~ti~~ Site Concord, California
I NCO R p 0 RATED f--c_o:_,;c_o~::in~~ ~F-Au=T~':'--u~"'"'_:A_RF_,~1-9_7J_._u_._s_. _G _· s_:_. ----1
ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS CONSULTANTS IN THE APPLIED
EARTH SCIENCES N6-0740-B2
FIGURE NO.
J
2150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE {415) 548-8800
I I I I I I I I I
•• I I I I I I I I I
r~· . . ~ .. 1ENGEO Self-Service Station Site
CoYJcord, Ca·lifornia
SECONDARY FAl'LTS
ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SCALE 1 "= 2r. 0' JOB coNsuL TANTS 1N THE APPLIED DATE JiJ>"le 1 G NO F6-C?40-B2
EARTH SCIENCES ' ~ t ./ ' •
FIGURE NO.
4
lINCORPORATED
~150 SH . .\TTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE t415) 548-8800
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
EN GEO
Lineation - rise in topography inter?reted to be fs.ul t scarp or fault rel9ted
Self-Service Station Site Concord, California
AERIAL FHOTOG3APH 1952 INCORPORATED>--~~~~~~~~~~
SCALE 1" = 1 , 6 7" ~~,,--.,,,--~_,,...,"""~r-~-1J08 6 4 ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS CONSULTANTS IN THE APPLIED
EARTH SCIENCES DATE Ju"'le, 1970 NO. N -07 C-32
FIGURE NO.
5
2150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE (415) 548-8800
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Self-Service Station Site Concord, California
I N CO R p OR ATE O ~"-'~ r_c_"~~'° ?_o_o_s ~~"' ·~s_n_;::<_E-..qR_. E_D_" "'_" -~_D_L_T'_' _r'._AP __ -1
SCALE 1 "= 200.
EN GEO ENGINEERS ANO GEOLOGISTS - JQ8 CONSU1E.1~'i-~Sslt'ili::tE'i,?PLIEO DATE Jll_'._'18' 1976 NO. r·~6-C740-B2
FIGURE NO.
6
2150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE (415) 548-8800
11 " I ,. i
I I I I I I I I: I I I ,I
'• " f I I
r
SIT£
•
\'L ·--...l.---L- STA 1+53
25'
SETBACK NO BURIE GAS TANK NE OF TH t LINE
Self-Service Stq.tion Site Con.cord, C9-l1:'ornia EN GEO
I NC 0 R P 0 RATE D f-,,-___ _,,...,,..--n~.,..,.8~_::1r_c:_~ _Lo_c.--A'f._r_c;_; -~--
FIGURE NO.
7
ENGINEERS ANO GEOLOGISTS SCALE ' - JOB caNsULTANTs IN THE APPLIED NO r-.r6-0?4o-E,2
EARTH sc1ENcEs DATE June 19 6 · ~ 150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE (415) 548-8800
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Fault located iYL trench by ENGEO, 1974
Concord ?aul t - r:"1.ill ·J:r,,_ce
Aerial Photo 1972 'teal Esta.t" Atlas of Contra Costa Co.
EN GEO SRlf-Service Station Site Concord, California
:'JORT~3BN SE8!'/f3~JT CONCO:!OD FAULT
INCORPORATED~---___,.-:-:-:-~---r~~~~---i ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SCALE 1 "= 600' JOB N6-0740-32
CONSULTANTS IN THE APPLIED DA 6 NO EARTH sc1ENcEs TE June 19 7 ·
FIGURE NO.
8
2150 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 600, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 · PHONE (415) 548-8800