Economic Systems There are three main questions any economy has to answer: • What is to be produced? • How will it be produced? • Who will get what is produced? These three fundamental questions have to be answered by any economy, whether it is a highly developed economy, the poorest of countries, or a small group of people stranded on a desert island. To answer these questions, different economic systems have developed. These systems revolve around how people in those societies allocate scarce resources to satisfy competing wants and needs. In other words, an economic system attempts to find ways of solving the basic economic problem. To think about how this works, imagine you were stranded on a desert island with a group offriends. You each know that you have to find some way of surviving. You have a meeting and Identify the basic necessities needed to survive - food, water, clothing, shelter - and then put your minds to working out how you are going to provide for these needs. Stranded on a desert island - what sort of system would you set up to solve the economicproblem?You identify each person's particular talents and interests, and split up the tasks of providing for your needs by agreeing to exchange what you each produce. Some people in the group have an interest in fishing and agree to spend their time catching enough fish for all. Others have skills in design and technology and volunteer to build shelter and so on. The common agreement to exchange is crucial to survival. There might also have to be some way in which the rate of exchange will be managed. For example, the people go ing fishing pointed out that what they were doing was so essential to survival that they ought to be allowed to keep more of the fish they caught, whilst another group felt the fact that they collected water pointed
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
There are three main questions any economy has to answer:
• What is to be produced?
• How will it be produced?
• Who will get what is produced?
These three fundamental questions have to be answered by any economy, whether it is a highly
developed economy, the poorest of countries, or a small group of people stranded on a desert
island.
To answer these questions, different economic systems have developed. These systems revolve
around how people in those societies allocate scarce resources to satisfy competing wants and
needs. In other words, an economic system attempts to find ways of solving the basic economic
problem.
To think about how this works, imagine you were stranded on a desert island with a group of
friends. You each know that you have to find some way of surviving. You have a meeting and
Identify the basic necessities needed to survive - food, water, clothing, shelter - and then put
your minds to working out how you are going to provide for these needs.
Stranded on a desert island - what sort of system would you set up to solve the economic
problem?
You identify each person's particular talents and interests, and split up the tasks of providing for
your needs by agreeing to exchange what you each produce. Some people in the group have an
interest in fishing and agree to spend their time catching enough fish for all. Others have skills in
design and technology and volunteer to build shelter and so on.
The common agreement to exchange is crucial to survival. There might also have to be some way
in which the rate of exchange will be managed. For example, the people going fishing pointed out
that what they were doing was so essential to survival that they ought to be allowed to keepmore of the fish they caught, whilst another group felt the fact that they collected water pointed
Command, or Planned (referred to hereafter as planned) economies have been closely
associated with the so-called communist regimes in Russia and Eastern Europe that arose from
1917 onwards, finally collapsing in the late 1980s and early 1990s. We say 'so-called'
communist states because they were not the states that Marx and Engels would have
recognised; however, they did have some characteristics of that philosophy.
The main feature of this type of economic system is the way in which resources are allocated. In
a planned system, the three basic questions are answered through some form of central
planning. In the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), the state central planning
authority was called Gosplan. Its function was to identify what goods and services were needed
by the people, how these goods and services would be produced and how the state output
would be distributed.
It takes a considerable imagination to understand the complexity of such a task. Needless to
say, it involved huge numbers of people involved in the planning process - bureaucrats shuffling
paper and directing operations. In reality, it meant that factories, farms and so on were given
directions about what they should be producing. They were also given the resources that the
planners had worked out would be necessary for producing that output. Most factories and
farms were given output targets to reach; once produced, it might be the job of another body to
ensure that goods were distributed.
In return for the labour expended in producing this output, a wage was given. This wage,
however, bore no relation to the value of the output being produced. The wage was planned to
allow workers to be able to buy the things the planners had worked out they needed to live on.
To enable this to happen, prices were also set by the planning authorities.
In theory, everyone had enough to live on. Wage differentials were minimal - whether you were
a highly qualified university professor or a street cleaner, wages only varied by a small amount.
In the late 1980s to early 1990s, it was estimated that the average income in a city like Moscowwas between £18 and £38 per month. As such, the income distribution could be seen as being
very narrow, with few 'rich' and few 'poor'. Most people had a job if they wanted one, regardless
of the type of job; unemployment was therefore zero. Inflation did not exist as we know it
because of the system of price fixing and there were very few homeless people - the state
provided housing.
Housing estate outside Moscow, 1990. Homeless people were rare in Soviet Russia but the
quality of housing and of housing accommodation was not necessarily of the highest quality! To
understand this type of system, it is important to try to appreciate the political assumptions
underpinning it. There was an expectation that each person was not working for their own
• Many roads in the USSR and even in the capital, Moscow, suffered from potholes.
Gangs of workers would be tasked to go and repair these potholes; indeed, that is what
they did. They would arrive with a lorry full of tarmac, shovel some into the offending hole
and flatten it out with the back of their shovel. Job done and off they went. The next car
that came along very quickly dislodged the tarmac and Muscovites were back to square
one.
• Workers were told to go and decorate hotel rooms in a Moscow hotel. The woodwork,
including the windows, needed painting. That is what the workers did - they painted the
windows. There was no preparation of the woodwork, no masking of the windows, just
paint applied to the wood and most of the window as well! Still, the job had been
completed as requested.
• Four women all have jobs - their job is to sweep leaves and litter in a local park. They
are each given their allocated section to clean. They do this by sweeping the leaves and
litter from their section onto another section. It does not take much imagination to work
out the futility of this process, but it does mean that everyone has a job!
Some of these examples come from personal observation - as ridiculous as they might sound.
At the other extreme were examples of amazing achievements - the space programme for one,
but also the move from a backward, agrarian-based economy to one of the most powerful
nations on earth, all in the space of just 40 years. Additionally, the metro and public transport
systems in Moscow were to be envied - and at ridiculously low prices. Despite this, the
pressures of the inefficiencies in the system did mean that something had to change and with
the accession of Mikhail Gorbachev to the presidency in 1985, things changed very rapidly
indeed.
To inject the element of efficiency into the system, a whole culture change was necessary. The
acceptance of some form of profit motive as a means to improve the allocation of resources andimprove quality and efficiency, along with the abandonment of price fixing, was a key part of
the programme. When price fixing was removed, it was invariably followed by rapid inflation as
the pent-up demand and shortage of supply began to feed through into the system. For many
ordinary Russians, the move to a capitalist economy meant hardship, uncertainty and economic
collapse. Gone were the certainties of the old planned system.
Cuba - still ruled by Fidel Castro as a planned economy. Inefficiencies in the system, as well as
sanctions by the US, have not helped the country to develop as its potential might suggest.
Planned economies still exist in some parts of the world, most notably in Cuba and some states
in Africa. In most cases, these economies are high on political rhetoric about equality but low on
economic benefits to the population. It must be remembered that there are elements of a
planned system that have some benefit, notably in the provision of public goods. However, as
an economic system in answering the basic questions of the economic problem, it has been
found wanting.
The Market Economy
Pure market economies rarely exist but in theory, a market economy answers the three
questions that form the economic problem through a market system. The market system is
based on the demand and supply of products. Demand and supply determine prices and prices
act as signals to both producers (suppliers) and consumers (who create demand).
The market system relies on a number of factors to ensure that it works efficiently.
• The profit motive - the incentive for a reward for enterprise
• Good levels of information being available to both producers and consumers
• Price accurately reflecting the costs and benefits of consumption and production
• The ease with which resources can move to different uses
At the heart of the market system is the profit motive. Entrepreneurs (those who organise
resources into production) are stimulated to take risks and produce goods and services by the
prospect of seeing some return on their efforts. The extent to which they achieve this success is
dependent on identifying the level of demand for the good or service, as well as their ability to
manage production efficiently. If the costs of providing the good or service is less than the
revenue that they receive from selling those goods and services, they will make a profit. If they
can maximise revenue whilst reducing costs to a minimum, the level of profit they make will be
higher.
To maximise revenue and reduce costs, producers rely on high quality information to enable
them to access supplies at minimum cost, find ways of organising production in the most
efficient way and finding resources at minimum cost. Equally, consumers rely on information to
give them the guidance about what is available and what they are getting for their money.
To enable this to happen, price has a central role. It acts as a signal to both consumers and
producers. For consumers, it tells them whether what they are being asked to give up in terms
of money reflects the value or the level of satisfaction that will be gained from consumption. If I
buy a CD priced at £12.99 but do not like the music on it, I might decide that I was not getting
£12.99 worth of value - I could have used that £12.99 to better effect by buying something else
that would have given me more satisfaction.
For consumers, price tells them something about the relationship between the cost of production and the level of profit they are making. If prices are falling then this suggests
demand is also falling. As a result, the revenue being received from sales set against the cost of
supplying the good will narrow. There will come a point where that difference is so small that
the producer might decide that they would be better placed moving onto some other line of
production.
Price will only act as an accurate signal to consumers and producers if it properly reflects the
costs and benefits of production and consumption. This implies that prices will include all the
positive and negative externalities that are associated with production and consumption - in
many cases, this does not occur. When this happens, we get what is called market failure - an
inefficient allocation of resources.
If we assume that prices accurately reflect costs and benefits, decisions made by both producers
and consumers will lead to an efficient allocation of resources. This can only happen if resources
are able to move from one use to another. The ease with which resources can transfer from one
use to another is therefore important. How does this work?
Imagine a company that used to produce typewriters before computers and word processors
came along. Demand was high and prices, as a result, enabled the firm to make healthy profits.
As PCs and word processing software became more accessible, demand for typewriters starts to
fall. As demand falls, prices will also start to fall. The profit margins - the difference between
price and cost of production - start to narrow. The firm can continue but things are getting more
difficult. This process will continue and eventually it will be not worth the firm's while to
continue to produce typewriters. They start to look instead at moving into production of PCs