Economics 172 Issues in African Economic Development Lecture 17 March 16, 2006
Feb 11, 2016
Economics 172Issues in African Economic Development
Lecture 17March 16, 2006
Economics 172 2
Outline:(1) Impacts of slavery on African economic development
(Nunn 2005)(2) Historical population density and political power in
Africa (Herbst 2000)
Economics 172 3
Long-run impacts of slavery in Africa
• Nunn (2005) compiled a new dataset on the country of origin of individuals sent to the New World in the Atlantic Ocean and Indian Ocean slave trades, using shipping records, slave ethnicity data
• He assigns people shipped from a particular port as originally coming from that country or its neighbors (e.g., people shipped from ports today in Ghana are assigned to either Ghana or Burkina Faso)
Economics 172 4
Map of Africa
Economics 172 5
Long-run impacts of slavery in Africa
• Nunn (2005) compiled a new dataset on the country of origin of individuals sent to the New World in the Atlantic Ocean and Indian Ocean slave trades, using shipping records, slave ethnicity data
• He assigns people shipped from a particular port as originally coming from that country or its neighbors (e.g., people shipped from ports today in Ghana are assigned to either Ghana or Burkina Faso)
• Although an improvement, there are many ways this could generate imperfect data
Economics 172 6
Numbers of slaves taken, by country
• Nunn constructs a measure of slavery exposure
Economics 172 7
Long-run impacts
• The main regression equation is:
• The Y variables here include long-run income levels (per capita), economic growth rates, political outcomes. Nunn finds consistently negative impacts of slavery exposure on later economic outcomes
Economics 172 8
Economics 172 9
Economics 172 10
Long-run impacts
• The magnitude of these negative effects is quite large: a 1 s.d. increase in slave exports increases annual per capita economic growth during 1960-2000 by 1.25%
• There are also adverse impacts on many other political and institutional outcomes (Table 12). How to interpret the true channels leading to poor economic outcomes?
Economics 172 11
Economics 172 12
Economics 172 13
Interpretation of Nunn’s results
• Countries most exposed to European slave trading today look much worse off than other African countries. Several of Africa’s success stories (e.g., Botswana) were untouched by the trade
Economics 172 14
Interpretation of Nunn’s results
• Countries most exposed to European slave trading today look much worse off than other African countries. Several of Africa’s success stories (e.g., Botswana) were untouched by the trade
• But it is unclear exactly what the cause of this is. There are many theoretically plausible mechanisms through which slavery could affect current outcomes
Economics 172 15
Interpretation of Nunn’s results
• Countries most exposed to European slave trading today look much worse off than other African countries. Several of Africa’s success stories (e.g., Botswana) were untouched by the trade
• But it is unclear exactly what the cause of this is. There are many theoretically plausible mechanisms through which slavery could affect current outcomes
• Omitted variables: were the areas with the weakest political institutions historically most preyed upon?
Economics 172 16
Outline:(1) Impacts of slavery on African economic development
(Nunn 2005)(2) Historical population density and political power in
Africa (Herbst 2000)
Economics 172 17
Population density and politics in Africa
• The basic idea: historically, land was abundant in Africa and population was low. The scarce resource was labor not land
Economics 172 18
Population density and politics in Africa
• The basic idea: historically, land was abundant in Africa and population was low. The scarce resource was labor not land
• Wars in Sub-Saharan Africa traditionally were over control of labor (the valuable scarce resource) rather than the control of land
• The result is that warfare and politics look very different historically in Africa than in Europe or Asia, with their much higher population densities
Economics 172 19
Table 1.1, 1990 population densities
Region Density in 1900 (people/km2)Japan 118.2Europe 62.9China 45.6South Asia 38.2Sub-Saharan Africa 4.4Latin America 3.7
Economics 172 20
Table 1.1, 1990 population densities
Region Density in 1900 (people/km2)Japan 118.2Europe 62.9China 45.6South Asia 38.2Sub-Saharan Africa 4.4Latin America 3.7
• Why was population density so low in Africa?
Economics 172 21
Table 1.1, 1990 population densities
Region Density in 1900 (people/km2)Japan 118.2Europe 62.9China 45.6South Asia 38.2Sub-Saharan Africa 4.4Latin America 3.7
• Why was population density so low in Africa?(i) Tropical disease; (ii) Low agricultural productivity;(iii) The slave trade
Economics 172 22
Population density and politics in Africa
• Low population density made it difficult to radiate political power over space
• Exception: the highlands of East Africa (e.g., Rwanda)
Economics 172 23
Population density and politics in Africa
• Low population density made it difficult to radiate political power over space
• Exception: the highlands of East Africa (e.g., Rwanda)
• This picture begins to change in the 18th and 19th century, with the importation of millions of guns as part of the Slave Trade
• Larger states emerge during this period – Sokoto Emirate in Nigeria, Zulu Empire in Southern Africa, Buganda in Uganda, Ashanti in Ghana. Other important pre-colonial states include Swahili-Omani Kingdom, Ethiopia, Liberia
Economics 172 24
The rise of European colonialism
• This process of political consolidation was short-circuited by European conquest in the late 1800s
• Why did Europeans decide to conquer Africa, after being content for hundreds of years with trade?
Economics 172 25
The rise of European colonialism
• This process of political consolidation was short-circuited by European conquest in the late 1800s
• Why did Europeans decide to conquer Africa, after being content for hundreds of years with trade?(1) The invention of quinine greatly reduced the threat of malaria for Europeans(2) The invention of the machine gun (the Maxim gun) greatly increased their relative military might
Economics 172 26
Whiteboard #1
Economics 172 27
Whiteboard #2
Economics 172 28
Whiteboard #3
Economics 172 29
Whiteboard #4
Economics 172 30
Whiteboard #5
Economics 172 31
Map of Africa