Top Banner
Economics 105: Statistics Any questions? No GH due Monday.
42

Economics 105: Statistics

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

Alaina

Economics 105: Statistics. Any questions? No GH due Monday. . Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity. The Central Issue. When you move from single to multiple group research the big concern is whether the groups are comparable . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Economics 105: Statistics

Economics 105: Statistics• Any questions?• No GH due Monday.

Page 2: Economics 105: Statistics

Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity

Page 3: Economics 105: Statistics

• When you move from single to multiple group research the big concern is whether the groups are comparable.

• Usually this has to do with how you assign units (e.g., persons) to the groups (or select them into groups).

• We call this issue selection or selection bias.

The Central Issue

Page 4: Economics 105: Statistics

Administerprogram

Measureoutcomes

Measurebaseline

Alternativeexplanations

Alternativeexplanations

X OOOO

Do not administerprogram

Measureoutcomes

Measurebaseline

The Multiple Group Case

Page 5: Economics 105: Statistics

• Diabetes education for adolescents

• Pre-post comparison group design

• Measures (O) are standardized tests of diabetes knowledge

Example

Page 6: Economics 105: Statistics

• Any other event that occurs between pretest and posttest that the groups experience differently.

• For example, kids in one group pick up more diabetes concepts because they watch a special show on Oprah related to diabetes.

X OOOO

Selection-History Threat

Page 7: Economics 105: Statistics

• Differential rates of normal growth between pretest and posttest for the groups.

• They are learning at different rates, even without program.

X OOOO

Selection-Maturation Threat

Page 8: Economics 105: Statistics

• Differential effect on the posttest of taking the pretest.

• The test may have “primed” the kids differently in each group or they may have learned differentially from the test, not the program.

X OOOO

Selection-Testing Threat

Page 9: Economics 105: Statistics

• Any differential change in the test used for each group from pretest and posttest

• For example, change due to different forms of test being given differentially to each group, not due to program

X OOOO

Selection-Instrumentation Threat

Page 10: Economics 105: Statistics

• Differential nonrandom dropout between pretest and posttest.

• For example, kids drop out of the study at different rates for each group.

• Differential attrition

X OOOO

Selection-Mortality Threat

Page 11: Economics 105: Statistics

• Different rates of regression to the mean because groups differ in extremity.

• For example, program kids are disproportionately lower scorers and consequently have greater regression to the mean.

X OOOO

Selection-Regression Threat

Page 12: Economics 105: Statistics

“Social Interaction” Threats to Internal Validity

Page 13: Economics 105: Statistics

• All are related to social pressures in the research context, which can lead to posttest differences that are not directly caused by the treatment itself.

• Most of these can be minimized by isolating the two groups from each other, but this leads to other problems (for example, hard to randomly assign and then isolate, or may reduce generalizability).

What Are “Social” Threats?

Page 14: Economics 105: Statistics

• Controls might learn about the treatment from treated people (for example, kids in the diabetes educational group and control group share the same hospital cafeteria and talk with one another).

Diffusion or Imitation of Treatment

Page 15: Economics 105: Statistics

• Administrators give a compensating treatment to controls.

• Researchers feel badly and give control group kids a video to watch pertaining to diabetes. Contaminates the study!

=

Compensatory Equalization of Treatment

Page 16: Economics 105: Statistics

• Controls compete to keep up with treatment group.

Compensatory Rivalry

Page 17: Economics 105: Statistics

• Controls "give up" or get discouraged

• Likely to exaggerate the posttest differences, making your program look more effective than it really is

Resentful Demoralization

Page 18: Economics 105: Statistics

What is a Clinical Trial?• “A prospective study comparing the effect and

value of intervention(s) against a control in human beings.”

• Prospective means “over time”; vs. retrospective• It is attempting to change the natural course of a

disease• It is NOT a study of people who are on drug X

versus people who are not

• http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/info/resources

Page 19: Economics 105: Statistics

Model of Two-Group Randomized Clinical Trial

Page 20: Economics 105: Statistics

What are the characteristics of a Clinical Trial?• Begins with a primary research question, and the trial

design flows from this question (constrained by practicalities)

• Everything must be exhaustively defined in advance (to prevent accusations of fishing for a positive finding)

• The hypothesis (“-es”)• Population to be studied• inclusion criteria• exclusion criteria• contraindications to therapy• indications to therapy• Treatment strategy (treatment, exact dosage, dosage

schedule, etc)• The outcome(s)

Page 21: Economics 105: Statistics

Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT)• Published in Journal of the American Medical AssociationJAMA 1982; 247: 1701 - 1714JAMA 1983; 250: 2814 – 2819• Up until about 25 years ago, the treatment of myocardial

infarction consisted of bed rest, alleviation of symptomatic pain, possible administration of early antiarrhythmics

• But a third of people who have a heart attack die from it ‘suddenly’

• In 1976, NIH sponsored a conference to discuss potential agents to be used in either a primary or secondary prevention setting to reduce sudden death, for which there was no treatment.

• The conference made an official recommendation to do a clinical trial.

Page 22: Economics 105: Statistics

Example: Job Corps• What is Job Corps? http://jobcorps.doleta.gov/

• January 5, 2006 Thursday Late Edition – Final

SECTION: Section C; Column 1; Business/Financial Desk; ECONOMIC SCENE; Pg. 3

HEADLINE: New (and Sometimes Conflicting) Data on the Value to Society of the Job Corps

BYLINE: By Alan B. Krueger.

Alan B. Krueger is the Bendheim professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University. His Web site is www.krueger.princeton.edu.

He delivered the 2005 Cornelson Lecture in the Department of Economics here at Davidson (that’s the big econ lecture each year).

Page 23: Economics 105: Statistics

Example: Job Corps• Quotations from “New (and Sometimes Conflicting) Data on the Value

to Society of the Job Corps” by Alan B. Krueger.

• Since 1993, Mathematica Policy Research Inc. has evaluated the performance of the Job Corps for the Department of Labor.

• Its evaluation is based on one of the most rigorous research designs ever used for a government program. From late 1994 to December 1995, some 9,409 applicants to the Job Corps were randomly selected to be admitted to the program and another 6,000 were randomly selected for a control group that was excluded from the Job Corps.

• Those admitted to the program had a lower crime rate, higher literacy scores and higher earnings than the control group.

Page 24: Economics 105: Statistics

RCT for Credit Card Offers

Source: Agarwal, et al. (2010), Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, 42 (4)

Page 25: Economics 105: Statistics

RCT for Education in India

Source: Banerjee, et al. (2007), Quarterly Journal of Economics

Page 26: Economics 105: Statistics

RCT for Education in India

Page 27: Economics 105: Statistics

RCT for the Effect of High Rewards on Performance

Source: Ariely, Gneezy, Loewenstein, and Mazar (2009), Review of Economic Studies

Page 28: Economics 105: Statistics

RCT for the Effect of High Rewards on Performance

Page 30: Economics 105: Statistics

Correlation vs. Regression• A scatter plot can be used to show the

relationship between two variables• Correlation analysis is used to measure

strength of the association (linear relationship) between two variables– Correlation is only concerned with strength of the

relationship – No causal effect is implied with correlation

Page 31: Economics 105: Statistics

Introduction to Regression Analysis• Regression analysis is used to:

– Predict the value of a dependent variable based on the value of at least one independent variable

– Explain the impact of changes in an independent variable on the dependent variable

• Dependent variable: the variable we wish to predict or explain ... outcome variable, Y.

• Independent variables: the variables used to explain variation in Y ... covariates, explanatory variables, r.h.s. vars, X-variables

Page 32: Economics 105: Statistics

Simple Linear Regression Model

• Only one independent variable, X• Relationship between X and Y is

described by a linear function• Changes in Y are assumed to be

caused by changes in X

Page 33: Economics 105: Statistics

Types of Relationships

Y

X

Y

X

Y

Y

X

X

Linear relationships Curvilinear relationships

Page 34: Economics 105: Statistics

Types of Relationships

Y

X

Y

X

Y

Y

X

X

Strong relationships Weak relationships

(continued)

Page 35: Economics 105: Statistics

Types of Relationships

Y

X

Y

X

No relationship

(continued)

Page 36: Economics 105: Statistics

Theoretical Linear Models• The basis of “causality” in models

– Time ordering– Co-variation– Non-spuriousness

• Examples– Fire Deaths = f (# of fire trucks at the scene)– Job Retention = f (current job satisfaction)– Income = f (education)

Page 37: Economics 105: Statistics

Deterministic Linear Models•Theoretical Model:– b0 and b1 are constant terms

• b0 is the intercept

• b1 is the slope

– Xi is a predictor of Yia

bb0

Xi

Yi

Page 38: Economics 105: Statistics

Linear component

Stochastic Simple Linear Population Regression Model

Population Y intercept

Population SlopeCoefficient

Population Random Error term

Outcome Variable

Explanatory Variable

Random Error component

Page 39: Economics 105: Statistics

(continued)

Pop Random Error for this Xi value

Y

X

Observed Value of Y for Xi

Xi

Pop Slope = β1

Pop Intercept = β0

εi

Stochastic Simple Linear Population Regression Model

Page 40: Economics 105: Statistics

The Multiple Regression Model

Idea: Examine the linear relationship between 1 dependent (Y) & 2 or more independent variables (Xi)

Multiple Regression Model with k Independent Variables:

Y-intercept Population slopes Random Error

• Endogenous explanatory variables

Page 41: Economics 105: Statistics

Modeling Exercise examples• What is the effect of your roommate’s SAT

scores on your grades? The effect of studying?

• Do police reduce crime?

• Does more education increase wages?

• What is the effect of school start time on academic achievement?

• Does movie violence increase violent crime?

Page 42: Economics 105: Statistics

Endogenous Explanatory Variable• Causes of endogenous explanatory variables

include …• Wrong functional form• Omitted variable bias … occurs if both the

1. Omitted variable theoretically determines Y2. Omitted variable is correlated with an included X

• Errors-in-variables (aka, measurement error)• Sample selection bias• Simultaneity bias (Y also determines X)