Top Banner

of 28

Economic Study 1 Final

Apr 09, 2018

Download

Documents

jennabush
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    1/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    2/28

    2

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    3/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    4/28

    4

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    5/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    6/28

    6

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    7/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    8/28

    8

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    9/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    10/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    11/28

    HSR Alignments

    Altamont Railroad Project

    Potential Stations

    San Diego

    Escondido

    San Jose

    San Francisco

    Gilroy

    Bakersfield

    Fresno

    Merced

    Modesto

    Visalia/Tulare/Hanford

    University City

    Norwalk

    Burbank City of Industry

    Murrieta

    SFO Airport

    Redwood City/Palo Alto

    UC Riverside

    Ontario Airport

    SylmarPalmdale

    Irvine

    Anaheim

    Stockton

    LOS ANGELES

    Sacramento

    The Authority also anticipates operating15 HSR trains per day between UnionStation and Anaheim. Travel time willbe 20 minutes at an average speed of110 mph. Two proposed intermediatestops are anticipated at Norwalk/Santa FeSprings or Fullerton.

    Phase 2 of the planned system willinclude additional HSR lines betweenMerced and Sacramento and betweenUnion Station and San Diego. TheAuthority anticipates operating 46 trainsper day between Union Station and SanDiego, with a travel time of one hour and20 minutes. This section of the systemwill swing east through the Inland Empire,with numerous stops under consideration,including Ontario Airport.

    Figure 1. Proposed HSR Intercity Passenger Routes Serving Los Angeles

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    12/28

    12

    Los Angeles to: 220 mph

    San Francisco 7,171,500Sacramento 2,878,000

    San Diego 2,278,800TOTAL 12,328,300

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    13/28

    1

    Category Daily Percent of TotalTotal 14,100 Local < 100 Miles 10,300 73%Inter-Regional > 100 Miles 3,800 27%

    Commuters 6,600 47% Into Downtown 5,300

    From Downtown 1,300Business 1,600 11%

    So. California Residents 1,100

    Long Distance Travelers 500

    Entertainment Shopping 6,000 43%So. California Residents 4,500

    Long Distance Travelers 1,500

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    14/28

    14

    Measure Unit 220 mph2035 Employment Jobs 54,0562035 Output (Sales) $m per year $7,5192035 Value-Added (GRP) $m per year $4,3402035 Wages $m per year $2,977

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    15/28

    1

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    16/28

    16

    WISCONSIN

    Madison Milwaukee

    MINNESOTA

    Minneapolis-St. Paul

    Funded 110 mph HSR System

    Proposed 220 mph HSR System

    OHIO

    ILLINOIS

    IOWA

    MICHIGAN

    MISSOURI

    INDIANA

    Detroit

    St. Louis

    Toledo

    Ft. Wayne

    Springfield

    CHICAGO

    Normal

    Cincinnati

    Indianapolis

    Lafayette

    Pontiac

    Kalamazoo

    ClevelandCleveland

    Decatur

    Champaign

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    17/28

    1

    Chicago to: 110 mph 220 mphSt. Louis 1,106,600 2,093,700

    Minneapolis 1,960,500 3,796,000Detroit 1,877,700 3,710,500

    TOTAL 4,944,800 9,600,200

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    18/28

    18

    Measure Unit 110 mph 220 mph2035 Employment Jobs 18,374 42,200.02035 Output (Sales) $m per year $2,577.8 $6,087.32035 Value-Added (GRP) $m per year $1,489.7 $3,554.82035 Wages $m per year $1,033.0 $2,466.6

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    19/28

    1

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    20/28

    20

    Phase 2 - Tampa to Orlando

    Phase 2 Option 1 (I-95: Orlando to Miami)

    Phase 2 Option 2 (Turnpike: Orlando to Miami)

    Proposed Routes

    Possible Stations

    Jacksonville

    Ft. Myers

    Sarasota

    Fort LauderdaleNaples

    St. PetersburgBradenton

    Pensacola

    Gainesville

    Ocala

    Lakeland

    Daytona Beach

    West Palm Beach

    Fort Pierce

    Cocoa/Port CanaveralDisney

    Airport

    Tallahassee

    Tampa

    Miami

    Orlando

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    21/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    22/28

    22

    Measure Unit 168 / 186 mph 220 mph2035 Employment Jobs 19,935 27,453.02035 Output (Sales) $m per year $2,128.1 $2,942.42035 Value-Added (GRP) $m per year $1,230.7 $1,706.12035 Wages $m per year $ 833.5 $1,155.8

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    23/28

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    24/28

    24

    Buffalo

    Montreal

    Rochester

    Poughkeepsie

    New York City

    Boston

    Springfield

    ALBANYSyracuse

    Albany to: 79/90 mph 110 mph 220 mphBuffalo 280,800 329,500 623,400

    Montreal 156,000 167,900 324,000

    NYC 1,152,300 1,291,800 2,252,200

    Boston 270,000 315,300 589,300

    TOTAL 1,859,100 2,104,500 3,788,900

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    25/28

    2

    Measure Unit 79 / 90 mph 110 mph 220 mph2035 Employment Jobs 3,184 4,703 21,3612035 Output (Sales) $m per year $357.9 $534.4 $2,485.62035 Value-Added (GRP) $m per year $205.9 $308.4 $1,444.62035 Wages $m per year $158.7 $238.5 $1,118.2

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    26/28

    26

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    27/28

    2

  • 8/8/2019 Economic Study 1 Final

    28/28

    FSC

    CERTIFICA-

    TION