Top Banner
Econ 240 C Lecture 13
87

Econ 240 C

Mar 21, 2016

Download

Documents

Gavin

Econ 240 C. Lecture 13. Part I. CA Budget Crisis. CA Budget Crisis. What is Happening to UC? UC Budget from the state General Fund. UC Budget. Econ 240A Lab Four New data for Fiscal Year 2004-05 Governor’s Budget Summary 2004-05 released January 2004 http://www.dof.ca.gov/. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Econ 240 C

Econ 240 C

Lecture 13

Page 2: Econ 240 C

2

Part I. CA Budget Crisis

Page 3: Econ 240 C

3

CA Budget Crisis

What is Happening to UC?• UC Budget from the state General Fund

Page 4: Econ 240 C

4

UC Budget

Econ 240A Lab Four New data for Fiscal Year 2004-05 Governor’s Budget Summary 2004-05

• released January 2004• http://www.dof.ca.gov/

Page 5: Econ 240 C

UC Budget in $Millions, 1968-69 through 2004-05

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

Mill

ions

$

Page 6: Econ 240 C

6

CA Budget Crisis

What is happening to the CA economy?• CA personal income

Page 7: Econ 240 C

California Personal Income in Billions

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

Billi

ons

$

Page 8: Econ 240 C

California Personal Income in Billions

10

100

1000

10000

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

Billi

ons

$

Log Scale

Page 9: Econ 240 C

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

70 75 80 85 90 95 00

LNCAPY

Natural Logarithm of California Personal Income, 68-04

Page 10: Econ 240 C

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

70 75 80 85 90 95 00

DLNCAPY

Fractional Change in CA Personal Income, DLNCAPY

Page 11: Econ 240 C

11

CA Budget Crisis

How is UC faring relative to the CA economy?

Page 12: Econ 240 C

UC Budget Vs. California Personal Income, 68-69 through 04-05

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

CA Personal Income, $B

UC B

udge

t, $B

Page 13: Econ 240 C

13

CA Budget Crisis

What is happening to CA state Government?• General Fund Expenditures?

Page 14: Econ 240 C

California Government State General Fund Expenditures

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

$ M

illio

ns

Page 15: Econ 240 C

15

CA Budget Crisis

How is CA state government General Fund expenditure faring relative to the CA economy?

Page 16: Econ 240 C

CA Size of Govt. Vs. CA Economy, 68-89 through 04-05

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

CA Personal Income, $ B

CA G

en. F

und

Expe

nditu

res,

$ B

Page 17: Econ 240 C

17

Long Run Pattern Analysis

Make use of definitions: UCBudget = (UCBudget/CA Gen Fnd

Exp)*(CA Gen Fnd Exp/CA Pers Inc)* CA Pers Inc

UC Budget = UC Budget Share*Relative Size of CA Government*CA Pers Inc

Page 18: Econ 240 C

18What has happened to UC’s Share of CA General Fund

Expenditures? UC Budget Share = (UC Budget/CA Gen

Fnd Exp)

Page 19: Econ 240 C

UC's Share of the California General Fund Expenditure

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

Perc

ent

Page 20: Econ 240 C
Page 21: Econ 240 C

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

3

4

5

6

7

8

70 75 80 85 90 95 00

Residual Actual Fitted

UC's declining Budget Share ~ 0.1 % Per Year

Page 22: Econ 240 C

22

UC Budget Crisis

UC’s Budget Share goes down about one tenth of one per cent per year• will the legislature continue to lower UC’s

share? • Probably, since competing constituencies such

as prisons, health and K-12 will continue to lobby the legislature.

Page 23: Econ 240 C

23What has happened to the size of California Government Expenditure Relative to Personal Income? Relative Size of CA Government = (CA

Gen Fnd Exp/CA Pers Inc)

Page 24: Econ 240 C

The Size of California State Government Relative to the Economy

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

Perc

ent

Page 25: Econ 240 C

25

California Political History Proposition 13

• approximately 2/3 of CA voters passed Prop. 13 on June 6, 1978 reducing property tax and shifting fiscal responsibility from the local to state level

Gann Inititiative (Prop 4)• In November 1979, the Gann initiative was

passed by the voters, limits real per capita government expenditures

Page 26: Econ 240 C

26

CA Budget Crisis

Estimate of the relative size of the CA government: 6.00 %

Page 27: Econ 240 C

27CA Budget Crisis: Pattern Estimate of UC Budget UC Budget = UC Budget Share*Relative

Size of CA Government*CA Pers Inc Political trends estimate UC Budget = 0.035*.060*1266.4 $B =$

2.66 B estimate Governor’s proposal in January: $ 2.67 B

Page 28: Econ 240 C

28

Econometric Estimates of UCBUD

Linear trend Exponential trend Linear dependence on CAPY Constant elasticity of CAPY

Page 29: Econ 240 C

29

Econometric Estimates

Linear Trend Estimate UCBUDB(t) = a + b*t +e(t)

• about 3.0 B• Too optimistic

Page 30: Econ 240 C

UC Budget

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Fiscal year

$ B

illio

ns

Page 31: Econ 240 C

31

Econometric Estimates

Logarithmic (exponential trend) lnUCBUDB = a + b*t +e(t) simple exponential trend will over-estimate

UC Budget by far

Page 32: Econ 240 C

UC Budget

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Fiscal year

$ B

illio

ns

Page 33: Econ 240 C

33

Page 34: Econ 240 C

34

Econometric Estimate

Dependence of UC Budget on CA Personal Income

UCBUDB(t) = a + b*CAPY(t) + e(t) looks like a linear dependence on income

will overestimate the UC Budget for 2004-05

Page 35: Econ 240 C

UC Budget Vs. California Personal Income, 68-69 through 04-05

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

CA Personal Income, $B

UC B

udge

t, $B

Page 36: Econ 240 C

36

Econometric Estimates

How about a log-log relationship lnUCBUDB(t) = a + b*lnCAPY(t) + e(t) Estimated elasticity 0.855 autocorrelated residual fitted lnUCBUDB(2004-05) = 1.22342

• $3.40 B actual (Governor’s Proposal) = 0.98228

• $2.67B

Page 37: Econ 240 C

37

Page 38: Econ 240 C

38

Page 39: Econ 240 C

39

Page 40: Econ 240 C

40

Page 41: Econ 240 C

41

Econometric Estimates

Try a distributed lag Model of lnUCBUDB(t) on lnCAPY(t)• clearly lnUCBUDB(t) is trended (evolutionary)

so difference to get fractional changes in UC Budget

• likewise, need to difference the log of personal income

Page 42: Econ 240 C

42Identify dlnucbudb

Page 43: Econ 240 C

43

Page 44: Econ 240 C

44

Page 45: Econ 240 C

45Identify dlncapy

Page 46: Econ 240 C

46

Page 47: Econ 240 C

47

Page 48: Econ 240 C

48Estimate ARONE Model for dlncapy

Page 49: Econ 240 C

49This is a satisfactory model

Page 50: Econ 240 C

50Estimate ARONE Model for

dlncapy(t) Orthogonalize dlncapy and save residual need to do transform dlnucbudb dlnucbudb(t) = h(Z)*dlncapy(y) + resid(t) dlncapy(t) = 0.714*dlncapy(t-1) + N(t) [1 - 0.714Z]*dlnucbudb(t) = h(Z)* [1 -

0.714Z]*dlncapy(t) + [1 - 0.714Z]*resid(t) i.e. w(t) = h(Z)*N(t) + residw(t)

Page 51: Econ 240 C

51

Distributed Lag Model

Having saved resid as res[N(t)] from ARONE model for dlncapy

and having correspondingly transformed dlnucbud to w

cross-correlate w and res

Page 52: Econ 240 C

52

Page 53: Econ 240 C

53

Distributed lag model

There is contemporary correlation and maybe something at lag one

specify dlnucbud(t) = h0 *dlncapy(t) + h1

*dlncapy(t-1) + resid(t)

Page 54: Econ 240 C

54

Page 55: Econ 240 C

55

Page 56: Econ 240 C

56

Page 57: Econ 240 C

57Try an ARONE residual fo dlnucbudb

Page 58: Econ 240 C

58

Page 59: Econ 240 C

59

Page 60: Econ 240 C

60

Page 61: Econ 240 C

61

Try a dummy for 1992-93, the last recession, this is the once and for all decline in UCBudget mentioned by Granfield

There is too much autocorrelation in the residual from the regression of lnucbud(t) = a + b*lncapy(t) + e(t) to see the problem

Look at the same regression in differences

Page 62: Econ 240 C

62

Page 63: Econ 240 C

63

Page 64: Econ 240 C

64

Page 65: Econ 240 C

65

Page 66: Econ 240 C

66

Distributed lag Model

dlnucbud(t) = h0 *dlncapy(t) + h1

*dlncapy(t-1) + dummy (1992-93) + resid(t)

Page 67: Econ 240 C

67

Page 68: Econ 240 C

68

Page 69: Econ 240 C

69

Try an artwo residual instead of arone

Page 70: Econ 240 C

70

Page 71: Econ 240 C

71

Note the fitted tends to be higher than the residualFor the past three years suggesting UC is taking a bath

Page 72: Econ 240 C

72

Page 73: Econ 240 C

73Correlogram of the residuals: try an ar(1) or an ma(1)

Page 74: Econ 240 C

74

Page 75: Econ 240 C

75

Page 76: Econ 240 C

76Correlogram of the residuals

Page 77: Econ 240 C

77Fitted fractional change in UC Budget is –0.025 (-2.5%)versusGovernor’s proposal of -0.086 (-8.6%)

Page 78: Econ 240 C

78Conclusions Governors proposed cut in UC Budget of

8.6% is greater than expected from various Box-Jenkins models, controlling for income

The UC Budget growth path ratcheted down in the recession beginning July 1990

The UC Budget growth path looks like it is ratcheting down again in the recession beginning March 2001

Page 79: Econ 240 C

Logarithm of UC Budget: Changes in Growth Paths

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

68-69

70-71

72-73

74-75

76-77

78-79

80-81

82-83

84-85

86-87

88-89

90-91

92-93

94-95

96-97

98-99

00-01

02-03

04-05

Fiscal Year

lnuc

budb

Fitted through 91-92lnucbudb

Page 80: Econ 240 C

80

Try estimating the model in levels

Page 81: Econ 240 C

81

Page 82: Econ 240 C

82Correlogram of residuals: add an ARONE

Page 83: Econ 240 C

83

Page 84: Econ 240 C

84

Page 85: Econ 240 C

85Correlogram of the residuals

Page 86: Econ 240 C

86dlucbud c dlncapy(-1) dummy for 1992-93 dummy2for 2003-04 ma(7)

Page 87: Econ 240 C

87dlnucbud c dlncapy dummy for 1992-93 dummy2for 2003-04