Econ 240 C Lecture 13
Mar 21, 2016
Econ 240 C
Lecture 13
2
Part I. CA Budget Crisis
3
CA Budget Crisis
What is Happening to UC?• UC Budget from the state General Fund
4
UC Budget
Econ 240A Lab Four New data for Fiscal Year 2004-05 Governor’s Budget Summary 2004-05
• released January 2004• http://www.dof.ca.gov/
UC Budget in $Millions, 1968-69 through 2004-05
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
Mill
ions
$
6
CA Budget Crisis
What is happening to the CA economy?• CA personal income
California Personal Income in Billions
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
Billi
ons
$
California Personal Income in Billions
10
100
1000
10000
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
Billi
ons
$
Log Scale
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
70 75 80 85 90 95 00
LNCAPY
Natural Logarithm of California Personal Income, 68-04
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
70 75 80 85 90 95 00
DLNCAPY
Fractional Change in CA Personal Income, DLNCAPY
11
CA Budget Crisis
How is UC faring relative to the CA economy?
UC Budget Vs. California Personal Income, 68-69 through 04-05
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
CA Personal Income, $B
UC B
udge
t, $B
13
CA Budget Crisis
What is happening to CA state Government?• General Fund Expenditures?
California Government State General Fund Expenditures
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
$ M
illio
ns
15
CA Budget Crisis
How is CA state government General Fund expenditure faring relative to the CA economy?
CA Size of Govt. Vs. CA Economy, 68-89 through 04-05
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
CA Personal Income, $ B
CA G
en. F
und
Expe
nditu
res,
$ B
17
Long Run Pattern Analysis
Make use of definitions: UCBudget = (UCBudget/CA Gen Fnd
Exp)*(CA Gen Fnd Exp/CA Pers Inc)* CA Pers Inc
UC Budget = UC Budget Share*Relative Size of CA Government*CA Pers Inc
18What has happened to UC’s Share of CA General Fund
Expenditures? UC Budget Share = (UC Budget/CA Gen
Fnd Exp)
UC's Share of the California General Fund Expenditure
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
Perc
ent
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
3
4
5
6
7
8
70 75 80 85 90 95 00
Residual Actual Fitted
UC's declining Budget Share ~ 0.1 % Per Year
22
UC Budget Crisis
UC’s Budget Share goes down about one tenth of one per cent per year• will the legislature continue to lower UC’s
share? • Probably, since competing constituencies such
as prisons, health and K-12 will continue to lobby the legislature.
23What has happened to the size of California Government Expenditure Relative to Personal Income? Relative Size of CA Government = (CA
Gen Fnd Exp/CA Pers Inc)
The Size of California State Government Relative to the Economy
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
Perc
ent
25
California Political History Proposition 13
• approximately 2/3 of CA voters passed Prop. 13 on June 6, 1978 reducing property tax and shifting fiscal responsibility from the local to state level
Gann Inititiative (Prop 4)• In November 1979, the Gann initiative was
passed by the voters, limits real per capita government expenditures
26
CA Budget Crisis
Estimate of the relative size of the CA government: 6.00 %
27CA Budget Crisis: Pattern Estimate of UC Budget UC Budget = UC Budget Share*Relative
Size of CA Government*CA Pers Inc Political trends estimate UC Budget = 0.035*.060*1266.4 $B =$
2.66 B estimate Governor’s proposal in January: $ 2.67 B
28
Econometric Estimates of UCBUD
Linear trend Exponential trend Linear dependence on CAPY Constant elasticity of CAPY
29
Econometric Estimates
Linear Trend Estimate UCBUDB(t) = a + b*t +e(t)
• about 3.0 B• Too optimistic
UC Budget
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Fiscal year
$ B
illio
ns
31
Econometric Estimates
Logarithmic (exponential trend) lnUCBUDB = a + b*t +e(t) simple exponential trend will over-estimate
UC Budget by far
UC Budget
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Fiscal year
$ B
illio
ns
33
34
Econometric Estimate
Dependence of UC Budget on CA Personal Income
UCBUDB(t) = a + b*CAPY(t) + e(t) looks like a linear dependence on income
will overestimate the UC Budget for 2004-05
UC Budget Vs. California Personal Income, 68-69 through 04-05
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
CA Personal Income, $B
UC B
udge
t, $B
36
Econometric Estimates
How about a log-log relationship lnUCBUDB(t) = a + b*lnCAPY(t) + e(t) Estimated elasticity 0.855 autocorrelated residual fitted lnUCBUDB(2004-05) = 1.22342
• $3.40 B actual (Governor’s Proposal) = 0.98228
• $2.67B
37
38
39
40
41
Econometric Estimates
Try a distributed lag Model of lnUCBUDB(t) on lnCAPY(t)• clearly lnUCBUDB(t) is trended (evolutionary)
so difference to get fractional changes in UC Budget
• likewise, need to difference the log of personal income
42Identify dlnucbudb
43
44
45Identify dlncapy
46
47
48Estimate ARONE Model for dlncapy
49This is a satisfactory model
50Estimate ARONE Model for
dlncapy(t) Orthogonalize dlncapy and save residual need to do transform dlnucbudb dlnucbudb(t) = h(Z)*dlncapy(y) + resid(t) dlncapy(t) = 0.714*dlncapy(t-1) + N(t) [1 - 0.714Z]*dlnucbudb(t) = h(Z)* [1 -
0.714Z]*dlncapy(t) + [1 - 0.714Z]*resid(t) i.e. w(t) = h(Z)*N(t) + residw(t)
51
Distributed Lag Model
Having saved resid as res[N(t)] from ARONE model for dlncapy
and having correspondingly transformed dlnucbud to w
cross-correlate w and res
52
53
Distributed lag model
There is contemporary correlation and maybe something at lag one
specify dlnucbud(t) = h0 *dlncapy(t) + h1
*dlncapy(t-1) + resid(t)
54
55
56
57Try an ARONE residual fo dlnucbudb
58
59
60
61
Try a dummy for 1992-93, the last recession, this is the once and for all decline in UCBudget mentioned by Granfield
There is too much autocorrelation in the residual from the regression of lnucbud(t) = a + b*lncapy(t) + e(t) to see the problem
Look at the same regression in differences
62
63
64
65
66
Distributed lag Model
dlnucbud(t) = h0 *dlncapy(t) + h1
*dlncapy(t-1) + dummy (1992-93) + resid(t)
67
68
69
Try an artwo residual instead of arone
70
71
Note the fitted tends to be higher than the residualFor the past three years suggesting UC is taking a bath
72
73Correlogram of the residuals: try an ar(1) or an ma(1)
74
75
76Correlogram of the residuals
77Fitted fractional change in UC Budget is –0.025 (-2.5%)versusGovernor’s proposal of -0.086 (-8.6%)
78Conclusions Governors proposed cut in UC Budget of
8.6% is greater than expected from various Box-Jenkins models, controlling for income
The UC Budget growth path ratcheted down in the recession beginning July 1990
The UC Budget growth path looks like it is ratcheting down again in the recession beginning March 2001
Logarithm of UC Budget: Changes in Growth Paths
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
68-69
70-71
72-73
74-75
76-77
78-79
80-81
82-83
84-85
86-87
88-89
90-91
92-93
94-95
96-97
98-99
00-01
02-03
04-05
Fiscal Year
lnuc
budb
Fitted through 91-92lnucbudb
80
Try estimating the model in levels
81
82Correlogram of residuals: add an ARONE
83
84
85Correlogram of the residuals
86dlucbud c dlncapy(-1) dummy for 1992-93 dummy2for 2003-04 ma(7)
87dlnucbud c dlncapy dummy for 1992-93 dummy2for 2003-04