Top Banner
Establishing Long Term Support for Eclipse Jochen Krause, EclipseSource Karsten Schmidt, SAP AG
25
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Establishing Long Term Support for Eclipse

Jochen Krause, EclipseSource

Karsten Schmidt, SAP AG

Page 2: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Introduction

Eclipse has always targeted commercial usage

But discrepancy between lifecycles

Early 2009: we triggeredthe discussion at Eclipse

Early 2010: Board of Directors Working Group

June 2010: Board approved proposal

Goal: have it up and running by end of 2011 Commercial approach: business

opportunities for the ecosystem

Page 3: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Eclipse is mainstream in many industries

Page 4: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Luckily we are not (yet) flying

Page 5: Econ 2011 2254_draft

But even systems engineering tools have a need for looong maintenance

Page 6: Econ 2011 2254_draft

We are also moving into thecomputing centers ...

Page 7: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Equinox, Riena, Virgo, Gemini, RAP, EclipseLink, ....

Page 8: Econ 2011 2254_draft

On the server you care about support

Page 9: Econ 2011 2254_draft

The Lifecycle Challenge

Major Eclipse release each year

– Two support releases in the following 9 months

No service releases beyond SR2

– Organizations requiring support beyond a year need to find a third party or do it themselves

Page 10: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Yawn – yet another support strategy for open source?

Page 11: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Eclipse long term support is different

Page 12: Econ 2011 2254_draft

We do it the Open Source Way!

No vendor lock-in

Source code is Open Source under EPL

All fixes are visible and available foreveryone – fix each bug only once!

Page 13: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Source Control and Versioning• Source code is Open Source under EPL• Anyone can find and download the patches• Optional branching for critical fixes

Build Infrastructure• Out-of-the-box build infrastructure also for old releases

Bugzilla• The same issue tracking as for the dev codeline

IP process, signing of archives• Generate the trust associated with the Eclipse brand by running the

IP process and by signing the archives• Binaries will only be available to participating companies

Central Infrastructure run by the Eclipse Foundation

Page 14: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Maintenance Committers

Today: Only Committers can check in source code

LTS: Concept of „Maintenance Committers“• ... are nominated by companies• ... do not have to be committers (but all

committers are maintenance committers)• ... may check in code into maintenance

codelines, not into dev codeline• But: each patch must be offered to the

committers to be included in the dev codeline

Page 15: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Most companies have committers in only a few projects

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Page 16: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Most companies have committers in only a few projects

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Company A Company B Company C Company D Company E

Page 17: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Most projects have committers from only a few companies

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Company A Company B Company C Company D Company E

Page 18: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Many commercial products use many projects ...

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Product X Product Y

Page 19: Econ 2011 2254_draft

... leading to many small support contracts

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Company A Company B Company C Company D Company E

Customer X Customer Y

Product X Product Y

Page 20: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Most companies offer support for only few releases back

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Cr -1

Cr - 2

Company A Company B Company C Company D Company E

Page 21: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Customers have support obligations for many years

Projects1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current release

Cr -1

Cr - 2

Cr - 3

...

Cr - many ?

Slide fromEclipseCon 2010

Page 22: Econ 2011 2254_draft

The Eclipse LTS Concept (1):System Integrators as „General Contractors“

Company A Company B Company C Company D Company E

Customer X Customer YCustomer W Customer Z

SI 1 SI 2

Page 23: Econ 2011 2254_draft

The Business Model

• Customer benefits– One contract partner, all customers share the costs– No vendor lock-in

• SIs benefits– Access to Open Source support infrastructure and Know-How– Bundling of the otherwise fragmented OSS support market

• Support companies: Get a shop-in-shop effect– Can get into business with their Know-How (committership)– Significantly lower infrastructure investments

• Eclipse Foundation– Additional revenue through fees for central infrastructure– Key differentiator compared to other OSS organizations

Page 24: Econ 2011 2254_draft

Outlook / Next Steps

• Eclipse Foundation has begun to collect input from potential customers, „General Contractors“, Companies offering project support

• Concept to be refined, based on the feedback• All input from YOU is highly appreciated• Plan: have the infrastructure up and running by end of

2011

A well-structured Long-Term Support infrastructure, based on Open Source principles, could become a key

differentiator for the Eclipse ecosystem!