Top Banner
Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga May 2019 Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga Highlands County Sampled July 2016 to June 2017 Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection May 2019 DEP Laboratory, Biology Program 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 6515 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 www.floridadep.gov
96

Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga · 2019. 5. 23. · Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019 Page 5 of 96 mean chlorophyll a value of less than 20 μg/L. Annual

Feb 15, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Ecological Assessment of

    Lake Istokpoga

    Highlands County

    Sampled July 2016 to June 2017

    Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration

    Florida Department of Environmental Protection

    May 2019

    DEP Laboratory, Biology Program

    2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 6515

    Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

    www.floridadep.gov

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 2 of 96

    Contents

    Contents ..........................................................................................................................................2

    Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................3

    Overview ..........................................................................................................................................4

    Methods............................................................................................................................................7

    Results ..............................................................................................................................................7

    Discussion ........................................................................................................................................9

    Appendix A. Phytoplankton Wet Taxa ..........................................................................................35

    Appendix B. Phytoplankton DiatomTaxa ......................................................................................84

    List of Tables

    Table 1. Measured field parameters. ............................................................................................. 11

    Table 2. Laboratory analytical results. .......................................................................................... 15

    Table 3. Dominance of algal species. ........................................................................................... 25

    Table 4. Phytoplankton taxonomic variables. ............................................................................... 26

    Table 5. Dominant wet and diatom taxa. ...................................................................................... 31

    List of Figures

    Figure 1 Map of Lake Istokpoga in Highlands County, Florida ..................................................... 6

    Figure 2. Graph of water temperature. .......................................................................................... 13

    Figure 3. Graph of pH. .................................................................................................................. 13

    Figure 4. Graph of dissolved oxygen. ........................................................................................... 14

    Figure 5. Graph of specific conductance. ..................................................................................... 14

    Figure 6. Graph of color (true). ..................................................................................................... 19

    Figure 7. Graph of total organic carbon. ....................................................................................... 19

    Figure 8. Graph of total suspended solids. .................................................................................... 20

    Figure 9. Graph of turbidity. ......................................................................................................... 20

    Figure 10. Graph of ortho-phosphate. ........................................................................................... 21

    Figure 11. Graph of total phosphorus. .......................................................................................... 21

    Figure 12. Graph of total Kjeldahl nitrogen.................................................................................. 22

    Figure 13. Graph of ammonia. ...................................................................................................... 22

    Figure 14. Graph of nitrate-nitrite. ................................................................................................ 23

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 3 of 96

    Figure 15. Graph of chlorophyll a, corrected. ............................................................................... 23

    Figure 16. Phytoplankton density. ................................................................................................ 24

    Figure 17. Comparison of phytoplankton density to chlorophyll a, corrected. ............................ 24

    Figure 18. Box and whisker plot of the percent composition by algal group. .............................. 30

    Figure 19. Average monthly minimum and maximum precipitation for Highlands County........ 34

    Executive Summary

    Highlands County Board of County Commissioners (HCBCC), through the Lake Istokpoga

    Management Committee (LIMC), requested sampling and analytical assistance from the Florida

    Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for Lake Istokpoga due to reported public

    concerns over the health of the waterbody and the potential of harmful algal bloom formation.

    Working in collaboration, staff from the DEP’s South Regional Operations Center (SROC) and

    Highlands County Parks and Natural Resources (HCPNR) conducted monthly sampling events at

    six locations on the lake over the course of one year, July 2016 to June 2017. Field parameters,

    water samples, and algal samples were collected at each site and sent for analysis to the DEP

    Laboratory in Tallahassee, (DOH Accreditation E31780).

    Measured field parameters exhibited similar and/or expected patterns across all 6 locations and

    dates. Total suspended solids, turbidity, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and chlorophyll a tended to

    increase over the study period. Lake color decreased over the study however, measurements

    were greater than 43 PCU for all sampling dates. For lakes with color greater than 40 PCU, the

    annual geometric mean for total phosphorus is to be between the 0.05 and 0.16 mg/L, for total

    nitrogen is to be between 1.27 mg/L and 2.23 mg/L, and for chlorophyll a is to be less than 20

    µg/L, Chapter 62-302.531(2)(a)(2)(b)1., Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The majority of

    single sample nutrient values measured during this study fell within this range however, 67 of the

    72 single sample chlorophyll a were greater than 20 µg/L.

    Samples were collected to examine whether a bloom condition existed at the time of collection.

    Dominant or co-dominant species were present in only 12 of the 72 samples. For those 12

    samples, the taxa identified as dominant or co-dominant were Cylindrospermopsis rackiborskii,

    Planktolyngbya contorta, Planktolyngbya limnetica, and Microcystis aeruginosa. These are

    cyanobacteria species (blue-green algae) that have the potential to produce toxins however,

    cyanotoxins were not detected in the 16 samples analyzed. Although potential toxin producing

    species may have been present, laboratory results indicate that these species were not producing

    toxins at the time of collection.

    Additional samples were collected for phytoplankton species identification and enumeration.

    With few exceptions, blue-green algae comprised the majority of the phytoplankton samples,

    followed by green algae. Algal density varied between the collection dates but generally,

    increased over the time, similar to the pattern of increasing chlorophyll a. There was a positive

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 4 of 96

    relationship between increasing phytoplankton density and chlorophyll a. Although algal density

    increased over time, the phytoplankton community composition remained fairly consistent

    within and among sites, indicating little shift in relative proportions of major groups of algae

    over the study period.

    The analytical results suggest similar water quality and biological communities among the 6

    different locations within the lake, with possibly the exception of the Northeast site. The pattern

    of change in both measured field parameters and water quality data reflect the pattern of change

    in average monthly rainfall received in Highlands County. This suggests that Lake Istokpoga’s

    water quality and algal community is susceptible to, influenced by, and changes in response to

    weather-driven patterns.

    Overview

    DEP Surface Water Quality Standards, Chapter 62-302, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.),

    are designed to protect the designated uses of waters and exceedances of these standards are

    associated with interference with the designated use. DEP uses methods in Chapter 62-303,

    F.A.C. to evaluate the condition of a waterbody in relation to the water quality criteria, including

    whether adverse impacts to biological communities have occurred. Human stressors that may

    negatively impact the condition of a waterbody include increased inputs of nutrients, sediments

    and/or pesticides from watershed runoff, undesirable removal of native shoreline and/or upland

    buffer vegetation, and introduction of nuisance (generally exotic) plants and animals.

    For waterbodies with Class I, II, III and III Limited designations, surface water quality criteria

    prohibit the alteration of nutrient concentration “so as to cause an imbalance in natural

    populations of aquatic flora and fauna” (62-302.530(48)(b). The criteria also prohibits the

    presence of any “substances in concentrations which results in the dominance of nuisance

    species” 62-302.530(47) F.A.C.. A variety of field assessment methods and analytical parameters

    can be used in conjunction with one another to detect potential stressors and imbalances in the

    biological communities. For example, measuring the nutrient concentration in a waterbody may

    indicate the potential for excessive plant or algal growth. Measuring the concentration of the

    photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll a in a water sample, provides an estimate of algal biomass.

    Higher than expected chlorophyll a for a particular waterbody may indicate the presence of algal

    bloom conditions which may not only result in unwanted shading of aquatic plants but pose a

    human health risk if certain potential toxin producing species are present.

    Measuring the concentration of the photosynthetic pigment, chlorophyll a, in a water sample

    provides an estimate of algal biomass. For lakes, 62-302.531(2)(a)(2)(b)1., F.A.C. of the

    Numeric Interpretations of Narrative Nutrient Criteria describes the applicable interpretation of

    the narrative nutrient criteria in paragraph 62-302.530(48)(b), F.A.C. for chlorophyll a. In clear,

    low alkalinity lakes (color less than 40 PCU and alkalinity less than 20 mg/L CaCO3), a healthy

    system is expected to have a geometric mean chlorophyll a value of less than 6 μg/L. In clear,

    high alkalinity lakes (color less than 40 PCU and alkalinity greater than 20 µg/L CaCO3) or in

    colored lakes (color greater than 40 PCU), healthy systems are expected to have a geometric

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 5 of 96

    mean chlorophyll a value of less than 20 μg/L. Annual geometric mean chlorophyll a greater

    than these values may result in the waterbody being identified as impaired or not meeting water

    quality standards. Higher chlorophyll a indicates greater algal biomass and possibly the presence

    of bloom conditions.

    Lake Istokpoga is located approximately 7 miles northeast of Lake Placid, FL in Highlands

    County (Figure 1). Fed by Arbuckle Creek and Josephine Creek in the north, the lake discharges

    into the C41 canal to the south. Lake Istokpoga is part of the Kissimmee watershed and

    therefore, lies within the Peninsula Nutrient Watershed Region, 62-302.200(13)(e) F.A.C. The

    predominate land use surrounding the lake includes pastures, citrus groves, and residential

    dwelling. This lake has a Class III designated use defined as fish consumption; recreation,

    propagation and maintenance of a healthy, well-balanced population of fish and wildlife, 62-

    302.400 F.A.C.

    Using the methods of evaluation in Chapter 62-303, F.A.C., Lake Istokpoga is currently verified

    impaired for chlorophyll a, total phosphorous, and total nitrogen and was included on the

    verified list of impaired waters adopted June 27, 2017, https://floridadep.gov/dear/watershed-

    assessment-section/content/lists-impaired-waters-group-4-basins. Currently, a Total Maximum

    Daily Loads (TMDLs) is under development for the lake and is anticipated to be completed by

    2022. Additional information about this waterbody is available on DEP ArcGIS Online,

    http://fdep.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html.

    https://floridadep.gov/dear/watershed-assessment-section/content/lists-impaired-waters-group-4-basinshttps://floridadep.gov/dear/watershed-assessment-section/content/lists-impaired-waters-group-4-basinshttp://fdep.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 6 of 96

    Figure 1 Map of Lake Istokpoga in Highlands County, Florida

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 7 of 96

    Methods

    Working in collaboration, staff from the DEP’s South Regional Operations Center (SROC) and

    Highlands County Parks and Natural Resources (HCPNR) conducted monthly sampling events at

    six locations on the lake over the course of one year, July 2016 to June 2017. Water quality

    readings for temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and pH were conducted at

    each site using YSI multi-parameter meters. Direct surface grab samples were collected for

    ammonia, chlorophyll a, true color, turbidity, total suspended solids, total organic carbon, nitrate

    and nitrite, ortho-phosphate, total phosphorous, algal toxins, and algal species identification.

    Water samples were preserved and shipped for analysis to the DEP Laboratory in Tallahassee,

    (DOH Accreditation E31780). Due to staff turnover, the October 2016, January 2017, and April

    2017 quantitative water samples for algal identification were sent to and analyzed by Greenwater

    Labs, Inc..

    All field and laboratory methods followed DEP Standard Operating Procedures (see

    https://floridadep.gov/dear/quality-assurance/content/dep-sops and

    https://floridadep.gov/dear/florida-dep-laboratory/content/dep-laboratory-quality-assurance-

    manual-and-sops for details) and met DEP quality assurance/quality control standards (see

    https://floridadep.gov/dear/quality-assurance).

    All references to 62-302.530, F.A.C. are to the surface water quality criteria table with an

    effective date of 02/17/2016 and a notice identification number of 17115667.

    Results

    Measured field parameters for all 12 sampling dates at the 6 lake locations are presented in Table

    1. These parameters exhibited similar patterns across all 6 locations. As expected, water

    temperature was highest in the summer months and lowest in the winter months (Figure 2). In

    general, measured pH was lowest and less variable across most sites September through

    November 2016 (Figure 3). The greatest pH values were measured at most sites March through

    June 2017. Dissolved oxygen was recorded as either mg/L or percent saturation. Percent

    saturation was calculated to facilitate comparisons across sampling dates. Percent saturation was

    higher in the winter and spring months and lower during the summer and fall months (Figure 4).

    Specific conductance was only recorded for 6 of the 12 sampling dates. Specific conductance

    was slightly lower on the two sampling dates in 2016 than the 4 sampling dates in 2017 (Figure

    5).

    Analytical chemistry results are presented in Table 2. Graphs for each parameter are included to

    help visualize the relationships and patterns in the data. The Northeast site results tended to be

    different from other sites for certain sampling dates and parameters. Of note, is that the analytical

    results for samples collected at the Northeast site July through September or October 2016 and

    especially in June 2017, were greater for ammonia, color, total organic carbon, ortho-phosphate,

    and total phosphorus and lower for total suspended solids and turbidity than all the other values

    measured at that site and at the other 5 sites during the duration of the study. Also, of note, only

    https://floridadep.gov/dear/quality-assurance/content/dep-sopshttp://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/library/lab_sops.htmhttps://floridadep.gov/dear/florida-dep-laboratory/content/dep-laboratory-quality-assurance-manual-and-sopshttps://floridadep.gov/dear/florida-dep-laboratory/content/dep-laboratory-quality-assurance-manual-and-sopshttps://floridadep.gov/dear/quality-assurance

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 8 of 96

    1 of 72 samples for nitrate-nitrite had a detection greater than the laboratory practical

    quantitation limit (PQL). The result for this 1 sample, collected on November 29, 2016 at the

    Northwest site, was 10 times greater than the PQL. All laboratory analytical quality control

    associated with this sample was re-reviewed and confirmed passing and therefore, it is either an

    anomalous result compared to others in the study or there was possible contamination either in

    the field or prior to analysis.

    Lake color measurements were greater than 43 PCU for all sampling dates (Figure 6). Color and

    total organic carbon showed similar patterns (Figures 6 and 7, respectively). Although consistent

    in concentration relative to one another, values for color and total organic carbon were more

    variable between the 6 locations from July through October 2016. After, values converged and

    remained consistent between sites November 2016 through May 2017 and until the exception of

    the June 29, 2017 Northeast site sample. Total suspended solids and turbidity values were similar

    across sites from July through December 2016 then, steadily increased until May 2017. Both

    total suspended solids and turbidity decreased in the June 2017 samples (Figures 8 and 9,

    respectively).

    Ortho-phosphate and total phosphorus concentrations at the Northeast site were greater in the

    first few months and on the final month of the study than for all other samples collected (Figures

    10 and 11, respectively). Ortho-phosphate was detected in only 5 samples at the Northeast site

    and was either not detected (59 samples) or detected between the laboratory method detection

    limit (MDL) and PQL (8 samples) for all other samples collected during the study. Total

    phosphorus was detected at all sites and those values increased over time. With the exceptions of

    2 samples collected at Northeast site on August 2016 and June 2017, total phosphorus values

    ranged between 0.03 and 0.13 mg/L. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen values were lower in 2016 than

    2017 and, in 2017 increased over time (Figure 12). Ammonia and nitrate-nitrite values were low

    and consistent over the entire study period, with only 2 sample exceptions. Ammonia was

    detected below 0.011 mg/L except in the Northeast June 2017 sample and nitrate-nitrite values

    were all less than 0.009 mg/L except in the Northwest November 2016 sample (Figure 13 and

    14, respectively). Chlorophyll a is an indicator of algal biomass and is considered a potential

    response variable to nutrients. Chlorophyll a concentration, in a similar pattern to the total

    suspended solids and turbidity data, slowly increased over time (Figure 15). All but 5 of 72

    single sample values were greater than 20 µg/L.

    DEP taxonomists examined microscopically aliquots of water samples from each location and

    sampling date to determine if a dominant taxon or co-dominant taxa of algae were present at the

    time of collection. Dominance of one or few species may indicate the presence of an algal bloom

    condition in the waterbody. There was a mixed assemblage and no clear dominance of algal

    species in 60 of the 72 samples examined (Table 3). Dominance of one or two species in the

    samples was observed on only 4 collection dates, July 2016, October 2016, March 2017, and

    May 2017. A dominant species was never observed in the samples from the Northeast site. In

    July 2016 and October 2016, dominant and co-dominant species occurred in samples at each of

    the other 5 sites. For the 12 samples, the taxa identified as dominant or co-dominant were

    Cylindrospermopsis rackiborskii, Planktolyngbya contorta, Planktolyngbya limnetica, and

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 9 of 96

    Microcystis aeruginosa. These are cyanobacteria species (blue-green algae) that have the

    potential to produce toxins.

    Toxin analysis was performed if algal species that have the potential to produce toxins were

    observed during the microscopic examination of water samples collected to identify if a

    dominant algal species was present. Toxins were analyzed by HPLC/MS/MS for samples

    collected at all 6 sites for July and August 2016, the Southeast site for October 2016, and the

    South, Southeast, and West sites for June 2017. Microcystins and cylindrospermopsin were not

    detected in any of the analyzed samples. Anatoxin-a was analyzed in the June 2017 sample only

    and was not detected.

    A summary of the water samples collected for quantitative phytoplankton taxonomic analysis is

    provided in Table 4. Phytoplankton wet taxa and diatoms are identified separately. In the wet

    taxa analysis, soft algae are identified to the lowest practical level, and diatoms are identified

    only to order level (diatom). In the diatom analysis, diatoms are identified to the lowest practical

    level. Taxa lists are provided for the wet algae and diatoms in appendices A and B, respectively.

    Algal density is calculated as number of natural units/mL for phytoplankton samples. Algal

    density varied between the collection dates but generally, increased over the time, similar to the

    pattern of increasing chlorophyll a (Figure 17). The was a positive relationship between

    increasing phytoplankton density and chlorophyll a, corrected analytical results.

    Phytoplankton community composition is calculated to examine potential shifts in relative

    proportions of major groups of algae. With few exceptions, blue-green algae (cyanobacteria)

    comprised the majority of the phytoplankton samples, followed by green algae. Two exceptions

    were the Northeast July 2016 sample, which contained 44% diatoms and only 16% blue-greens,

    and the September 2016 sample, which contained 43% green and 40% blue-green algae. With

    the Northeast July 2016 data point removed, the percent of blue-green algae ranged from 41% to

    80% and averaged 63% of the sample community. Green algae comprised the next largest

    percent of the samples, ranging from 8% to 43% and averaging 22% of the sample community.

    The Northeast July 2016 sample also contained 28% Pyrrophytes, which then decreased to 7% in

    the sample collected the following month. In all following samples at this site and in all samples

    from the other 5 sites, Pyrrophytes comprised less than 0.7%. In the Northeast July 2016 sample,

    the percent of green algae across all sites was approximately half the percent green algae found

    in all other samples in the study. The dominant taxa identified in the quantitative samples are

    presented in Table 5.

    Discussion

    Measured field parameters exhibited similar and/or expected patterns across all 6 locations and

    dates although specific conductance was greater in 2017 than 2016. The analytical results

    suggest similar water quality and biological communities among the 6 different locations within

    the lake, with possibly the exception of the Northeast site. Measurements of lake color were

    greater than 43 PCU for all sampling dates. The majority of single sample nutrient values

    measured during this study fell within the range of annual geometric means identified for lakes

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 10 of 96

    with color greater than 40 PCU however, 67 of the 72 single sample chlorophyll a values were

    greater than the 20 µg/L threshold, 62-302.531(2)(a)(2)(b)1., F.A.C.

    Dominant or co-dominant species were present in only 12 of the 72 samples taken to examine

    whether a bloom condition existed at the time of collection. The cyanobacteria species (blue-

    green algae) identified in those samples, Cylindrospermopsis rackiborskii, Planktolyngbya

    contorta, Planktolyngbya limnetica, and Microcystis aeruginosa, have the potential to produce

    toxins however, cyanotoxins were not detected in the 16 samples analyzed. Although potential

    toxin producing species may have been present, laboratory results indicate that these species

    were not producing toxins at the time of collection. Although algal density increased over time,

    the phytoplankton community composition indicated no shifts in relative proportions of major

    groups of algae over the study period.

    The pattern of changes in both measured field parameters and water quality data, reflect the

    pattern of average monthly rainfall received in Highlands County. Precipitation data was

    retrieved for Highlands County from the Community Collaborative Rain, Hail & Snow Network

    (CoCoRaHS) Rainy Day’s Report, https://www.cocorahs.org/ViewData/RainyDaysReport.aspx.

    Both minimum and maximum precipitation were averaged by month for the period July 1, 2017

    to June 30, 2017 (Figure 18). Precipitation data recorded from the station located on the

    northeast shore of the lake, Sylvan Shores 8.5NE, # FL-HL-12, reflected the pattern in the

    monthly county data. Increases in total suspended solids, turbidity, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and

    chlorophyll a along with decreases in color and total organic carbon coincide with periods of low

    precipitation. This suggests that Lake Istokpoga’s water quality and algal community is

    susceptible to, influenced by, and changes in response to weather-driven patterns.

    https://www.cocorahs.org/ViewData/RainyDaysReport.aspx

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 11 of 96

    Table 1. Measured field parameters.

    Field parameters measured at 6 locations on Lake Istokpoga on 12 sampling dates. A dash (-) indicates sample/measurement was not collected. The c indicates a

    calculated value.

    Site Parameter Unit 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Temperature C 29.9 31.1 28.8 25.5 20.3 22.1 16.5 22.2 23.3 21.3 28.1 29.5

    Center pH SU 7.9 7.8 7.1 7.4 7.0 7.2 7.6 7.9 8.3 8.8 8.8 8.0

    Center Dissolved

    Oxygen %Sat 101.7 c 83.4 101.8 103.8 c 113.5 108.8 99.4 c 106.7 108.3 116.3 c 101.1 98.5

    Center Dissolved

    Oxygen mg/L 7.7 - - 8.5 - - 9.7 - - 10.3 - -

    Center Specific

    Conductance

    µmhos/

    cm 101 - - 104 - - 130 138 - 117 - 189.2

    Northeast Temperature C 29.8 30.8 29.4 25.4 20.3 22.0 16.6 22.6 24.1 21.3 28.4 29.2

    Northeast pH SU 6.5 6.7 6.6 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.5 7.9 8.1 8.1 8.0 6.7

    Northeast Dissolved

    Oxygen %Sat 75.2 c 66.9 74.2 96.3 c 116.4 110.1 93.4 c 100.3 103.9 110.6 c 83.3 46.1

    Northeast Dissolved

    Oxygen mg/L 5.7 - - 7.9 - - 9.1 - - 9.8 - -

    Northeast Specific

    Conductance

    µmhos/

    cm 110 - - 103 - - 133 140 - 199 - 162.6

    Northwest Temperature C 29.9 31.4 29.1 25.6 20.7 22.7 16.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 28.6 30.5

    Northwest pH SU 8.2 7.9 7.3 7.3 6.6 7.9 7.9 8.5 7.9 8.8 8.5 8.6

    Northwest Dissolved

    Oxygen %Sat 111.0 c 115.3 87.4 93.0 c 114.9 100.8 90.9 c 115.8 99.3 117.6 c 89.1 101.3

    Northwest Dissolved

    Oxygen mg/L 8.4 - - 7.6 - - 8.8 - - 10.1 - -

    Northwest Specific

    Conductance

    µmhos/

    cm 107 - - 104 - - 133 139 - 198 - 170.8

    South Temperature C 29.9 30.9 30.0 26.0 20.3 22.1 16.7 22.8 24.8 22.2 28.2 30.6

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 12 of 96

    Site Parameter Unit 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    South pH SU 8.2 7.4 7.1 7.7 6.8 7.2 7.6 8.1 8.5 8.7 7.8 8.7

    South Dissolved

    Oxygen %Sat 100.4 c 94.5 74.8 108.5 c 103.1 106.2 89.5 c 101.8 113.3 114.8 c 70.6 96.3

    South Specific

    Conductance

    µmhos/

    cm 116 - - 106 - - 127 134 - 116 - 160.3

    Southeast Temperature C 29.6 31.2 29.2 25.4 20.4 22.1 16.5 22.3 24.4 21.2 27.8 30.4

    Southeast pH SU 7.8 7.0 6.9 7.6 6.9 7.2 7.7 8.0 8.2 8.6 9.3 8.6

    Southeast Dissolved

    Oxygen %Sat 95.9 c 81.8 77.6 102.4 c 112.0 106.6 87.1 c 65.7 110.8 105.9 c 102.3 95.7

    Southeast Dissolved

    Oxygen mg/L 7.3 - - 8.4 - - 8.5 - - 9.4 - -

    Southeast Specific

    Conductance

    µmhos/

    cm 107 - - 106 - - 128 136 - 192 - 163.8

    West Temperature C 29.5 31.4 28.7 25.4 20.1 21.8 16.5 22.8 23.8 23.3 28.0 29.7

    West pH SU 8.4 8.3 7.4 7.4 6.9 7.5 8.6 8.4 9.1 9.3 8.2 9.2

    West Dissolved

    Oxygen %Sat 102.3 c 116.4 96.7 102.4 c 114.2 104.5 96.3 c 109.7 116.5 124.3 c 89.1 112.5

    West Dissolved

    Oxygen mg/L 7.8 - - 8.4 - - 9.4 - - 10.6 - -

    West Specific

    Conductance

    µmhos/

    cm 108 - - 105 - - 129 135 - 194 - 174.5

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 13 of 96

    Figure 2. Graph of water temperature.

    Figure 3. Graph of pH.

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    26

    28

    30

    32

    34

    °C

    Sample Date

    Temperature

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    SU

    Sample Date

    pH

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 14 of 96

    Figure 4. Graph of dissolved oxygen.

    Figure 5. Graph of specific conductance.

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    % s

    atura

    tion

    Sample Date

    Dissolved Oxygen

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    220

    µm

    hos/

    cm

    Sample Date

    Specific Conductance

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwes

    tSouth

    Southeast

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 15 of 96

    Table 2. Laboratory analytical results.

    Analytical results for 6 locations on Lake Istokpoga on 12 sampling dates. Data qualifiers are as follows: A - Value reported is the mean of two or more

    determinations; I - The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit; J – Estimated value; Q -

    Sample held beyond normal holding time; U - Material analyzed for but not detected; value reported is the method detection limit.

    Site Analyte Unit 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Total Ammonia mg/L 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.004 I 0.006 0.009 0.005 I 0.0078 0.004 I 0.004 I 0.007 0.008

    Center Chlorophyll a,

    Corrected µg/L 33 30 34 34 48 38 J 56 42 49 51 A 63 48

    Center Color (true) PCU 160 120 110 120 Q 130 160 88 75 A 65 67 58 88

    Center Total Kjeldahl

    Nitrogen mg/L 1.1 J 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.8

    Center Nitrate -Nitrite mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    Center Ortho-phosphate mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.008

    IQ

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.004 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    Center Total Organic

    Carbon mg/L 17 15 15 17 16 16 15 15 15 15 14 16

    Center Total

    Phosphorus mg/L 0.075 0.059 0.055 0.068 0.059 0.067 0.13 0.083 0.08 0.095 0.097 0.1

    Center Total Suspended

    Solids mg/L 13 I 9 I 9 I 8 I 12 6 I 24 20 24 I 24 I 42 I 17 I

    Center Turbidity NTU 6.9 4.3 A 4.6 5.9 Q 7.1 5.2 14 8.3 9 11 10 8.8

    Northeast Total Ammonia mg/L 0.009 0.005 0.006 0.004 I 0.005 0.008 0.005 I 0.006 0.004 I 0.004 I 0.006 0.06

    Northeast Chlorophyll a,

    Corrected µg/L 26 32 33 A 25 23 19 J 55 A 40 44 44 66 18

    Northeast Color (true) PCU 190 130 110 160 Q 190 190 91 74 65 67 57 320

    Northeast Total Kjeldahl

    Nitrogen mg/L 0.84 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.99 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 2.2 2 1.7

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 16 of 96

    Site Analyte Unit 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Nitrate -Nitrite mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.009 I

    0.004

    U 0.007 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.009 I

    Northeast Ortho-phosphate mg/L 0.016 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.05 Q 0.036 0.037 0.004 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.14

    Northeast Total Organic

    Carbon mg/L 19 15 15 19 19 18 15 14 15 14 14 27

    Northeast Total

    Phosphorus mg/L 0.07 0.066 0.055 0.1 0.26 0.092 0.12 0.072 0.075 0.092 0.12 0.24

    Northeast Total Suspended

    Solids mg/L 6 I 12 8 I 10 A 4 I 4 I 26 17 19 20 I 48 I 7 I

    Northeast Turbidity NTU 3.7 4.7 4.9 A 2.9 Q 2.6 2.9 15 7.5 7.4 9.4 A 15 3.5

    Northwest Total Ammonia mg/L 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.003 I 0.005 I 0.007 0.005 I 0.01 0.004 I 0.004 I 0.006 0.008

    Northwest Chlorophyll a,

    Corrected µg/L 29 46 49 45 34 34 J 54 26 AQ 63 54 72 6.4

    Northwest Color (true) PCU 170 110 100 130 Q 130 130 85 75 Q 65 68 57 51

    Northwest Total Kjeldahl

    Nitrogen mg/L 0.78 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.5 2 1.6 1.8

    Northwest Nitrate -Nitrite mg/L 0.004

    U 0.1

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.004 I 0.008 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    Northwest Ortho-phosphate mg/L 0.008 I 0.004 I 0.005 I 0.004

    UQ

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    UQ

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    Northwest Total Organic

    Carbon mg/L 18 15 15 15 16 16 15 14 15 15 14 13

    Northwest Total

    Phosphorus mg/L 0.075 0.062 0.058 0.058 0.056 0.05 0.082 0.074 0.086 0.1 0.098 0.078

    Northwest Total Suspended

    Solids mg/L 9 I 12 17 11 9 I 10 22 24 26 23 I 46 I 40 I

    Northwest Turbidity NTU 5.9 5.7 9.1 6.3 Q 5.8 6.4 12 8.8 AQ 10 12 12 9.4

    South Total Ammonia mg/L 0.009 0.006 0.006 0.004 I 0.006 0.008 0.004 I 0.007 0.005 I 0.004 I 0.008 0.007

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 17 of 96

    Site Analyte Unit 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    South Chlorophyll a,

    Corrected µg/L 42 34 40 38 40 14 J 16 54 43 45 60 51 A

    South Color (true) PCU 97 A 110 99 83 80 71 85 74 67 A 66 55 43

    South Total Kjeldahl

    Nitrogen mg/L 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.1

    South Nitrate -Nitrite mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.004 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    South Ortho-phosphate mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    South Total Organic

    Carbon mg/L 14 15 15 15 15 14 16 15 16 15 14 13

    South Total

    Phosphorus mg/L 0.086 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.03 0.053 0.1 0.079 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.084

    South Total Suspended

    Solids mg/L 16 11 12 15 I 17 6 I 29 20 21 I 21 I 44 I 40 I

    South Turbidity NTU 9.3 4.8 5.8 6.8 6.6 5.8 14 9.3 7.7 A 12 12 9.9

    Southeast Total Ammonia mg/L 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 I 0.006 0.009 0.005 0.006 0.005 I 0.004 I 0.009 0.008

    Southeast Chlorophyll a,

    Corrected µg/L 37 33 36 38 42 30 66 53 38 41 54 45

    Southeast Color (true) PCU 110 120 100 120 A 110 110 A 86 74 64 67 A 59 44

    Southeast Total Kjeldahl

    Nitrogen mg/L 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.8 2 1.5

    Southeast Nitrate -Nitrite mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.004 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    Southeast Ortho-phosphate mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    UQ

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.005 I

    0.004

    U 0.006 I

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    Southeast Total Organic

    Carbon mg/L 15 15 15 16 16 16 15 15 15 16 16 14

    Southeast Total

    Phosphorus mg/L 0.083 0.056 0.066 0.073 0.064 0.061 0.13 0.08 0.072 0.099 0.11 0.077

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 18 of 96

    Site Analyte Unit 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Southeast Total Suspended

    Solids mg/L 18 12 13 12 12 9 I 25 19 21 I 22 I 46 I 38 I

    Southeast Turbidity NTU 7.9 5 5.4 6.5 6.3 5.9 14 9.4 7.1 10 12 8.9 A

    West Total Ammonia mg/L 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.011 0.005 I 0.009 0.004 I 0.005 I 0.007 0.008

    West Chlorophyll a,

    Corrected µg/L 25 29 35 46 Q 53 38 AJ 50 60 Q 49 48 62 A 63

    West Color (true) PCU 140 120 110 A 100 Q 110 110 85 76 Q 66 69 56 65

    West Total Kjeldahl

    Nitrogen mg/L 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9

    West Nitrate -Nitrite mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    West Ortho-phosphate mg/L 0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    UQ

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U 0.004 I

    0.004

    UQ

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    0.004

    U

    West Total Organic

    Carbon mg/L 16 15 15 15 16 14 15 14 16 16 14 14

    West Total

    Phosphorus mg/L 0.067 0.055 0.061 0.072 0.055 0.055 0.11 0.085 0.083 0.1 0.1 0.096

    West Total Suspended

    Solids mg/L 12 13 12 13 I 12 10 I 29 35 24 I 22 I 48 I 38 I

    West Turbidity NTU 6.6 4.5 5.2 8.1 Q 6.5 A 6.2 13 9.9 Q 9.8 11 12 A 10

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 19 of 96

    Figure 6. Graph of color (true).

    Figure 7. Graph of total organic carbon.

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    PC

    U

    Sample Date

    Color (true)

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    mg C

    /L

    Sample Date

    Total Organic Carbon

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 20 of 96

    Figure 8. Graph of total suspended solids.

    Figure 9. Graph of turbidity.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    mg/L

    Sample Date

    Total Suspended Solids

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    NT

    U

    Sample Date

    Turbidity

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 21 of 96

    Figure 10. Graph of ortho-phosphate.

    Figure 11. Graph of total phosphorus.

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    mg/L

    Sample Date

    Ortho-phosphate

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    mg/L

    Sample Date

    Total Phosphorus

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 22 of 96

    Figure 12. Graph of total Kjeldahl nitrogen.

    Figure 13. Graph of ammonia.

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    mg/L

    Sample Date

    Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    mg/L

    Sample Date

    Ammonia

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 23 of 96

    Figure 14. Graph of nitrate-nitrite.

    Figure 15. Graph of chlorophyll a, corrected.

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    mg/L

    Sample Date

    Nitrate-nitrite

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    µg/L

    Sample Date

    Chlorophyll a, corrected

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 24 of 96

    Figure 16. Phytoplankton density.

    Figure 17. Comparison of phytoplankton density to chlorophyll a, corrected.

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,000

    80,000

    100,000

    120,000

    140,000

    160,000# u

    nit

    s/m

    L

    Sample Date

    Phytoplankton Density

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000

    Chlo

    rophyll

    a, co

    rrec

    ted (

    µg/L

    )

    Phytoplankton Sample Density (# algal units/mL)

    Comparison of Chlorophyll a to Phytoplankton Density

    Center

    Northeast

    Northwest

    South

    Southeast

    West

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 25 of 96

    Table 3. Dominance of algal species.

    The presence of dominant or co-dominant algal species in water samples collected at 6 locations on Lake Istokpoga on 12 sampling dates to determine if a bloom

    condition was affecting the waterbody at time of collection. The table contains the count of samples and sites for each result. Abbreviations used within the table

    are C-Central, NE-Northeast, NW-Northwest, SE-Southeast, S-South, W-West.

    Dominant Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-16

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    None; mixed assemblage 1-NE 6 6 1-NE 6 6 6 6 5 6 5 6

    Cylindrospermopsis rackiborskii. - - - - - - - - - - 1-W -

    Planktolyngbya contorta. 2-C,

    NW - - 1-C - - - - - - - -

    Planktolyngbya contorta and

    Microcystis aeruginosa.

    2-SE,

    W - - 1-SE - - - - - - - -

    Planktolyngbya contorta and

    Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii. 1-S - - 1-W - - - - - - - -

    Planktolyngbya contorta and

    Planktolyngbya limnetica. - - -

    2-NW,

    S - - - - 1-S - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 26 of 96

    Table 4. Phytoplankton taxonomic variables.

    Summary of phytoplankton in quantitative water samples collected at 6 locations on Lake Istokpoga on 12 sampling dates. The table contains the count of

    samples and sites for each result.

    Site Variable 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Number of Wet Taxa 34 37 45 47 39 47 36 33 30 42 30 50

    Center Number Wet Algal

    Units Identified

    303 305 307 366 301 303 336 306 306 319 313 301

    Center Algal Density

    (# units/mL)

    39,214 30,129 21,571 44,229 24,749 56,826 74,351 39,967 48,494 124,670 772,21 74,328

    Center Percent Dominant

    Wet Taxon

    42.74 15.85 10.27 23.4 12.56 21.13 40.72 12.2 12.92 41.28 12.5 13.01

    Center % Blue-green 63.37 65.9 48.86 51.9 53.49 66.67 68.75 62.42 71.24 74.92 74.76 68.44

    Center % Green 12.86 20.98 22.8 25.4 20.27 20.46 22.02 20.59 17.32 18.18 14.38 20.93

    Center % Yellow-green 0 0 0.33 0.8 0 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Center % Cryptophytes 0 0 0.33 0.7 0 0 0.31 0 0 0.31 0 0.33

    Center % Euglenophytes 0.33 0 0.65 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Center % Pyrrophytes 0.66 0 0.33 4.9 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 0.32

    Center % Diatoms 22.78 13.11 27.04 21.9 25.91 12.54 9.23 16.99 11.44 6.58 10.54 10.63

    Northeast Number of Wet Taxa 38 50 44 46 76 99 36 35 33 37 34 53

    Northeast Number Wet Algal

    Units Identified

    304 311 302 192 604 534 325 301 303 304 312 301

    Northeast Algal Density

    (# units/mL)

    3,158 4,800 7093 22,178 44,144 88,858 84,072 35,211 33,616 108,272 69,153 22,291

    Northeast Percent Dominant

    Wet Taxon

    47.09 10.89 17.06 22.75 7.47 11.28 38.54 11.6 12.69 36.39 14.29 11.31

    Northeast % Blue-green 15.77 43.09 51.66 55.2 41.39 67.42 62.15 55.81 68.65 78.29 60.26 62.79

    Northeast % Green 13.33 29.9 27.48 30.2 22.85 20.22 26.15 27.24 19.8 17.76 18.27 27.91

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 27 of 96

    Site Variable 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast % Yellow-green 0.32 0 0.33 0.1 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33 0 0

    Northeast % Cryptophytes 0 0.32 0.33 0.0 0.99 0.67 0.31 0 0 0.31 0 0.33

    Northeast % Euglenophytes 0.32 2.25 0.33 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Northeast % Pyrrophytes 26.73 7.07 3.31 1.0 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.32

    Northeast % Diatoms 43.54 17.36 16.56 13.5 35.76 11.99 11.38 16.94 11.55 3.62 21.47 8.97

    Northwest Number of Wet Taxa 25 40 45 47 38 47 41 41 40 39 32 44

    Northwest Number Wet Algal

    Units Identified

    303 305 304 262 303 314 308 302 310 355 318 304

    Northwest Algal Density

    (# units/mL)

    37,737 29,822 23,004 32,151 21,547 67,403 73,296 41,088 56,423 149,873 77,531 91,489

    Northwest Percent Dominant

    Wet Taxon

    50 15.13 8.43 22.27 14.15 19.09 38.14 15.51 10.75 44.38 16.8 15.07

    Northwest % Blue-green 52.14 65.9 53.62 52.3 50.17 52.87 70.13 55.63 63.23 77.18 58.49 71.71

    Northwest % Green 8.59 22.62 31.58 40.5 18.81 17.2 24.03 25.5 26.77 17.75 20.13 17.43

    Northwest % Yellow-green 0 0 0.33 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0

    Northwest % Cryptophytes 0 0 0.33 0.0 0.99 0 0.31 0 0 0.31 0 0.33

    Northwest % Euglenophytes 0 0.33 0.33 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Northwest % Pyrrophytes 0 0 0.33 0.3 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 0.32

    Northwest % Diatoms 39.27 11.15 14.14 6.1 30.03 29.94 5.84 18.87 10 4.79 21.38 10.53

    South Number of Wet Taxa 32 39 48 44 40 51 40 38 37 40 32 38

    South Number Wet Algal

    Units Identified

    303 306 301 344 308 300 342 312 301 332 305 298

    South Algal Density

    (# units/mL)

    37,308 53,752 20,385 70,356 28,699 63,603 131,672 40,339 33,975 140,199 55,130 73,286

    South Percent Dominant

    Wet Taxon

    42.74 16.41 11.37 25.84 12.35 23.26 39.61 17.18 10.8 43.25 14.23 12.45

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 28 of 96

    Site Variable 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    South % Blue-green 64.03 54.9 40.86 62.5 57.47 63 68.13 62.18 70.1 74.7 69.51 72.82

    South % Green 12.87 28.43 43.19 32.3 21.43 22 21.35 21.79 25.25 23.49 18.03 18.79

    South % Yellow-green 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0

    South % Cryptophytes 0 0.33 0 0.0 0.99 0.67 0.31 0 0 0 0 0.33

    South % Euglenophytes 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    South % Pyrrophytes 0.33 0 0.66 0.3 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 0.32

    South % Diatoms 22.77 16.34 15.28 4.4 21.1 14 9.94 16.03 4.65 1.81 12.46 8.39

    Southeast Number of Wet Taxa 21 40 48 47 45 39 31 33 40 39 37 37

    Southeast Number Wet Algal

    Units Identified

    303 311 309 377 312 301 315 305 309 317 303 304

    Southeast Algal Density

    (# units/mL)

    37,516 41,399 22,889 74,761 26,693 60,391 112,026 41,134 43,246 122,058 44,119 90,331

    Southeast Percent Dominant

    Wet Taxon

    48.39 13.72 10.91 24.36 12.39 37.32 40.82 18.11 12.5 40.06 16.93 15.5

    Southeast % Blue-green 79.53 60.13 53.72 63.4 51.92 77.41 68.57 61.97 65.37 77.92 51.82 64.47

    Southeast % Green 12.22 28.94 34.95 30.2 19.55 14.29 24.76 24.92 20.06 20.5 32.01 20.39

    Southeast % Yellow-green 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Southeast % Cryptophytes 0 0 0 0.0 0.32 0.67 0.31 0 0 0 0 0.33

    Southeast % Euglenophytes 0.33 0 0 0.4 0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Southeast % Pyrrophytes 0 0 0.32 3.9 0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 0.32

    Southeast % Diatoms 7.92 10.93 11 6.4 27.56 8.31 6.67 13.11 14.56 1.58 16.17 15.13

    West Number of Wet Taxa 25 39 45 53 37 36 30 34 69 38 31 41

    West Number Wet Algal

    Units Identified

    303 312 301 339 303 307 322 308 611 315 306 300

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 29 of 96

    Site Variable 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    West Algal Density

    (# units/mL)

    43,688 35,887 31,508 49,683 24,750 95,641 88,437 49,340 108,481 130,930 54,573 109,613

    West Percent Dominant

    Wet Taxon

    53.66 16.31 10.61 22.22 14.4 25.56 39.87 16 7.13 49.18 20.15 24.71

    West % Blue-green 73.27 68.91 55.48 53.1 58.75 74.59 71.74 50.97 78.23 80.32 68.3 69

    West % Green 7.92 21.47 25.58 36.9 23.76 11.73 22.98 21.75 18.17 16.19 17.65 18.67

    West % Yellow-green 0 0 0.33 0.1 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33 0 0

    West % Cryptophytes 0 0 0.33 0.1 0 0 0.31 0 0 0.31 0 0.33

    West % Euglenophytes 0 0 0.33 0.0 0 0 0 0.32 0 0 0 0

    West % Pyrrophytes 0 0 0.33 0.2 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 0.32

    West % Diatoms 18.81 9.62 18.6 10.0 17.49 13.36 5.28 26.95 3.6 3.49 14.05 12.33

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 30 of 96

    Figure 18. Box and whisker plot of the percent composition by algal group.

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 31 of 96

    Table 5. Dominant wet and diatom taxa.

    Dominant wet and diatom taxa in quantitative phytoplankton samples for 6 locations on Lake Istokpoga on 12 sampling dates.

    Date Variable Center Northeast Northwest Southeast South West

    2016-

    7-25

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Glenodinium sp. Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    2016-

    7-25

    Class Cyanophyceae Dinophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2016-

    8-23

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Dolichospermum

    circinale

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Snowella sp. Snowella sp. Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    2016-

    8-23

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2016-

    9-27

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Aphanizomenon

    flosaquae

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Dictyosphaerium

    pulchellum

    Dictyosphaerium

    pulchellum

    Snowella sp.

    2016-

    9-27

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2016-

    10-19

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    2016-

    10-19

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2016-

    11-29

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Aphanocapsa incerta Planktolyngbya

    limnetica

    Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    Snowella sp. Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    2016-

    11-29

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2016-

    12-27

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon sp.

    2016-

    12-27

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2017-

    1-30

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    2017-

    1-30

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 32 of 96

    Date Variable Center Northeast Northwest Southeast South West

    2017-

    2-28

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    2017-

    2-28

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2017-

    3-29

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Snowella sp. Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    Cyanodictyon sp. Cyanodictyon sp. Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    2017-

    3-29

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2017-

    4-11

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    2017-

    4-11

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2017-

    5-23

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    Merismopedia

    warmingiana

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    Dictyosphaerium

    pulchellum

    Snowella sp. Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    2017-

    5-23

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2017-

    6-29

    Dominant Wet

    Taxon Name

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Aphanothece sp. Planktolyngbya

    contorta

    Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    2017-

    6-29

    Class Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae Cyanophyceae

    2016-

    7-25

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Staurosirella pinnata Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    2016-

    8-23

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Staurosira

    construens

    Aulacoseira sp. Staurosira

    construens

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    2016-

    9-27

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira sp. Staurosira

    construens

    Aulacoseira sp. Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    2016-

    10-19

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Staurosira

    construens

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 33 of 96

    Date Variable Center Northeast Northwest Southeast South West

    2016-

    12-27

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Staurosira

    construens

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    2017-

    1-30

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Staurosira

    construens

    2016-

    11-29

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Aulacoseira

    granulata

    2017-

    2-28

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosirella pinnata Aulacoseira

    granulata

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    2017-

    3-29

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosirella pinnata

    2017-

    4-11

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Staurosirella pinnata Staurosirella pinnata Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    2017-

    5-23

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosirella pinnata Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    Staurosira

    construens

    2017-

    6-29

    Dominant

    Diatom Taxon

    Name

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Staurosira

    construens

    Fragilaria

    berolinensis

    Staurosira

    construens

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 34 of 96

    Figure 19. Average monthly minimum and maximum precipitation for Highlands County.

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    Aver

    age

    (inch

    es)

    Year-Month

    Monthly Precipitation

    Average of Min Average of Max

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 35 of 96

    Appendix A. Phytoplankton Wet Taxa

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Actinastrum hantzschii - - - - 1 1 - - - - - -

    Center Ankistrodesmus - - - - - 8 - - - 1 - -

    Center Ankistrodesmus falcatus 3 - 3 - 2 3 - - - - - -

    Center Ankistrodesmus

    fusiformis

    - - - - 2 - - - 3 - - -

    Center Aphanizomenon

    flosaquae

    2 6 5 - 4 1 - - 4 - - 1

    Center Aphanocapsa 54 - - - - 8 2 - - 14 - 6

    Center Aphanocapsa conferta - - - 7 - - 5 - - 5 - -

    Center Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    1 14 10 7 23 8 21 19 25 2 25 15

    Center Aphanocapsa elachista - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Aphanocapsa incerta - 10 1 - 28 11 - 18 18 - 11 4

    Center Aphanocapsa

    planctonica

    - - - 5 10 7 1 4 - 1 - -

    Center Aphanothece - 12 - 1 - 10 1 9 10 2 25 20

    Center Aphanothece clathrata - - - 12 4 - 14 - - 29 - 6

    Center Aphanothece smithii - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Bacillariophyta 69 40 83 80 78 38 29 52 35 21 33 32

    Center Centritractus

    belanophorus

    - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 36 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Chlamydomonas 1 2 3 - 4 3 - - - - 1 2

    Center Chlorella - - - - - - - - - - - 1

    Center Chlorophyceae - - - 30 - - 15 - - 20 - 5

    Center Chodatella subsalsa - - - - - - 2 - - - - 1

    Center Chroococcales - - - 31 - - - - - - - 4

    Center Chroococcus - - - 1 - 7 - - - - - 17

    Center Chroococcus dispersus - - 3 - 11 - 1 - - - - 7

    Center Chroococcus minimus - - - - - - 6 - - 3 - -

    Center Chroococcus minutus - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

    Center Chroomonas - - 1 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Closterium - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - -

    Center Closterium acutum linea - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Closterium acutum

    variabile

    - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Closterium gracile - - - - - - - - - - 1 -

    Center Coelastrum microporum - - - - - - - - - - - 1

    Center Coelastrum

    proboscideum

    - - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -

    Center Coenochloris fottii - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Cosmarium - 1 - - - - - - - 1 - 1

    Center Crucigenia apiculata - - - 1 2 - - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 37 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Crucigenia crucifera - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Center Crucigenia irregularis - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

    Center Crucigenia rectangularis - 1 4 - - - - 1 - - - 2

    Center Crucigenia tetrapedia - - 1 - - - - 1 - - - -

    Center Cryptophyceae - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Cyanodictyon - 8 7 - 9 - - 7 18 - 17 -

    Center Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    - - - 67 - 56 125 - - 123 - 35

    Center Cyanophyceae - - - 14 - 3 10 - - 10 - 1

    Center Cylindrospermopsis

    gangetica

    - 3 2 - - - - - - - - 7

    Center Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    2 11 8 6 - 14 12 31 25 8 35 17

    Center Cylindrospermum - - 1 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Dactylococcopsis

    acicularis

    - - - 16 - - - - - - - -

    Center Dictyosphaerium - - - - - - 4 - - - - -

    Center Dictyosphaerium

    ehrenbergianum

    3 - 5 - - - 1 - 7 - - -

    Center Dictyosphaerium

    pulchellum

    - 19 13 2 4 4 - 8 3 - 23 4

    Center Dictyosphaerium

    tetrachotomum

    - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 38 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Dolichospermum - - - - 1 - - - - - - -

    Center Dolichospermum

    circinale

    5 14 18 - 2 3 - 2 - - - 1

    Center Dolichospermum

    helicoideum

    - - 1 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Dolichospermum

    planctonicum

    2 1 - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Dolichospermum

    spiroides

    - 2 - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Elakatothrix gelatinosa 2 - 1 - - 2 - - - - - -

    Center Elakatothrix viridis - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Euastrum - 2 - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Glaucospira - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Center Glenodinium - - 1 - - - - - - - 1 -

    Center Gloeocystis - - - - - - - - - - - 4

    Center Goniochloris - - - 2 - - - - - - - -

    Center Kirchneriella - 1 6 - 4 1 - 6 4 1 - 3

    Center Kirchneriella contorta - - - - - 2 - - - - - -

    Center Kirchneriella lunaris

    irregularis

    - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

    Center Kirchneriella obesa - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

    Center Koliella - - - - 6 - - 8 - - - 1

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 39 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Koliella longiseta

    f.variabilis

    - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Lagerheimia - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Lepocinclis 1 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Merismopedia punctata - - - 1 - - - - - - - 1

    Center Merismopedia

    tenuissima

    1 5 5 1 - 4 5 2 10 10 4 -

    Center Merismopedia

    warmingiana

    2 15 19 - 7 15 - 7 24 - 27 10

    Center Micractinium pusillum - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Microcystis - - - 2 - - - - - 1 - 1

    Center Microcystis aeruginosa 1 - 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 2 -

    Center Microcystis wesenbergii 5 5 3 - - 1 - - 2 - 3 1

    Center Monoraphidium - 6 6 - 6 1 - 9 2 1 2 -

    Center Monoraphidium

    arcuatum

    - - - 3 1 4 1 - - 1 - 5

    Center Monoraphidium

    circinale

    - - - 4 - - 2 - - 1 - -

    Center Monoraphidium

    contortum

    - - - 1 - - - - - 2 - -

    Center Monoraphidium

    griffithii

    - - - - - - 10 - - 5 - -

    Center Monoraphidium

    irregulare

    - - - 8 - - 15 - - 3 - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 40 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Nephrochlamys rostrata - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Nostocales - - - 3 - - 1 - - 1 - -

    Center Oocystis - 4 2 - 3 2 - 3 3 1 2 7

    Center Oocystis parva - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Oocystis pusilla - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Pandorina morum - - 1 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Pediastrum - - - - - - - - - - - 1

    Center Pediastrum duplex 1 1 - - - - - 2 - - - -

    Center Pediastrum tetras - - 3 - 3 - 2 1 - - - 1

    Center Peridinium 2 - - - 1 - - - - - - -

    Center Phacus - - 2 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Planktolyngbya - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Planktolyngbya contorta 100 42 23 20 16 18 14 18 24 8 28 18

    Center Planktolyngbya lacustris 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Planktolyngbya

    limnetica

    6 18 12 4 16 23 5 30 19 18 28 12

    Center Pseudanabaena 2 - - - 1 3 4 2 1 - - 2

    Center Pseudanabaena

    acicularis

    1 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Pseudodidymocystis - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

    Center Pseudodidymocystis

    fina

    - - - 2 - - 3 - - 2 - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 41 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Quadrigula chodati - - - - 2 - - 1 2 - - -

    Center Quadrigula closteroides - - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - -

    Center Rhabdogloea 7 4 9 - 14 5 - 17 3 - 9 3

    Center Romeria - 2 2 - - 3 - 2 - - 2 6

    Center Romeria leopoliensis - - - 4 3 - 2 - - - - -

    Center Scenedesmus - - - 9 - 7 15 - - 9 - 8

    Center Scenedesmus abundans 4 7 6 2 - 2 1 - 5 1 2 4

    Center Scenedesmus

    acuminatus

    1 - - - - - - - 2 - 2 -

    Center Scenedesmus

    acutiformis

    - 5 - - - - - - 8 - 4 -

    Center Scenedesmus bicaudatus 1 - 1 - - 2 - 3 - - 1 1

    Center Scenedesmus bijuga 1 2 4 - 2 - - 1 - - - 1

    Center Scenedesmus brevispina - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Center Scenedesmus communis - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Center Scenedesmus dimorphus 5 - - - - 2 - - - - - 1

    Center Scenedesmus obliquus - - 4 - - - - - - - - -

    Center Scenedesmus opoliensis - - - - 4 - - - - - - -

    Center Scenedesmus perforatus - - 1 1 - 2 - - 1 - 1 -

    Center Scenedesmus

    quadricauda

    9 10 1 2 10 9 - 15 10 - 2 5

    Center Scenedesmus verrucosus - - - - - - - - 1 - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 42 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Schroederia judayi 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Schroederia setigera - - - - - - - - - - - 2

    Center Selenastrum - - - - - - - - 1 - - -

    Center Snowella - 22 16 - 10 1 - 21 35 - 17 -

    Center Snowella lacustris - - - 3 - - - - - 1 - 10

    Center Snowella litoralis - - - 1 - - 1 - - - - 1

    Center Spirulina - 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 -

    Center Staurastrum 3 1 - - 1 1 - - 1 - 3 1

    Center Staurodesmus - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Center Stichococcus - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Center Synechocystis - 6 - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Tetraedron - - - - - 1 - - - 2 - 1

    Center Tetraedron caudatum - - - - - - - 1 - 2 - -

    Center Tetraedron gracile 1 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Tetraedron minimum - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Center Tetraedron muticum - 1 - - - - - - - - - -

    Center Tetraedron trigonum

    gracile

    - - 2 - 2 - - - - - - -

    Center Tetrastrum

    heterocanthum

    1 - 3 - 1 - - - - - - -

    Center Treubaria

    triappendiculata

    - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 43 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Center Xanthophyceae - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Actinastrum hantzschii - - - 1 3 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Anabaena - - - - - - - - - - - 1

    Northeast Ankistrodesmus falcatus 2 - 2 - 1 3 - - - - - 4

    Northeast Ankistrodesmus

    fusiformis

    - 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1 3

    Northeast Aphanizomenon - - - - - - - - - - - 1

    Northeast Aphanizomenon

    flosaquae

    - 15 43 - 1 2 - 2 2 - - -

    Northeast Aphanocapsa - - - - - 2 3 - - 24 - 7

    Northeast Aphanocapsa conferta - - - 5 - - 3 - - 5 - -

    Northeast Aphanocapsa

    delicatissima

    - 10 3 1 20 9 2 29 34 1 13 13

    Northeast Aphanocapsa elachista - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Aphanocapsa incerta - 7 10 - 7 - - 11 22 - 7 2

    Northeast Aphanocapsa

    planctonica

    - - - 2 - 1 3 4 - 4 - -

    Northeast Aphanothece - 3 1 - - 7 - 3 10 1 10 15

    Northeast Aphanothece clathrata - - - 4 - 6 12 - - 35 - 12

    Northeast Aphanothece smithii - - - - - 1 3 - - - - -

    Northeast Bacillariophyta 132 54 50 25 108 64 37 51 35 10 67 27

    Northeast Botryococcus braunii 1 - - - - - - - - - 2 -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 44 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Centritractus

    belanophorus

    1 - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Chlamydomonas 1 7 11 - - - - - - - 1 1

    Northeast Chlorella - - 5 - - - - - - - - 5

    Northeast Chlorophyceae - - - 21 - - 27 - - 25 - 9

    Northeast Chodatella subsalsa - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Chroococcales - - - 27 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Chroococcus - - - 1 - 11 - - - - - 7

    Northeast Chroococcus dispersus - - - 1 3 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Chroococcus minimus - - - - - - 2 - - 2 - -

    Northeast Closterium 1 4 4 - - 1 - 1 - - - 1

    Northeast Closterium acutum linea - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Closterium gracile - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

    Northeast Coccomonas - - 7 - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Coccomonas orbicularis 1 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Coelastrum microporum - 3 - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Coelastrum

    proboscideum

    - - - - 2 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Coelastrum sphaericum - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

    Northeast Coelosphaerium - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Coenochloris fottii - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 45 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Cosmarium - - - - - - - - - 3 - 3

    Northeast Crucigenia apiculata - - - - 2 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Crucigenia irregularis - - - - 1 - - - 2 - - -

    Northeast Crucigenia rectangularis - - 1 - - - - - 5 - - 1

    Northeast Crucigenia tetrapedia - 7 - - - - - 3 - - - -

    Northeast Cryptomonas - 1 1 - - - - - - - - 1

    Northeast Cryptophyceae - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

    Northeast Cuspidothrix

    issatschenkoi

    - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Cyanodictyon - 8 2 - 5 - - 10 33 - 3 -

    Northeast Cyanodictyon

    imperfectum

    - - - 38 - 53 111 - - 107 - 31

    Northeast Cyanophyceae - - - 1 - 8 16 - - 17 - 4

    Northeast Cylindrospermopsis

    gangetica

    - - 2 - 1 - - - - - - 3

    Northeast Cylindrospermopsis

    raciborskii

    27 2 1 3 1 11 4 22 17 2 31 14

    Northeast Dactylococcopsis

    acicularis

    - - - 5 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Desmatractum indutum - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Diacanthos

    belenophorus

    2 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Dichotomococcus - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 46 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Dictyosphaerium - - - - - - 7 - - - - 2

    Northeast Dictyosphaerium

    ehrenbergianum

    2 - - - 2 1 - - 8 - 3 -

    Northeast Dictyosphaerium

    pulchellum

    - 15 10 1 9 6 2 11 7 - 23 2

    Northeast Dictyosphaerium

    tetrachotomum

    - - - 2 - - - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Dolichospermum - - - 1 - - - - - - - 1

    Northeast Dolichospermum

    circinale

    4 28 34 - - - - 2 - - - -

    Northeast Dolichospermum

    perturbatum

    - 1 - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Dolichospermum

    planctonicum

    1 2 - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Dolichospermum

    spiroides

    - 1 - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Elakatothrix gelatinosa - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 -

    Northeast Elakatothrix viridis - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Euastrum - - - - - - - - 1 - - 2

    Northeast Eudorina elegans 1 1 - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Glenodinium 81 18 8 - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Gloeocapsa - - - - - - - - - - - 2

    Northeast Gloeocystis - 2 - - - - - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 47 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Goniochloris - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Kirchneriella - 5 10 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 2 1

    Northeast Kirchneriella lunaris - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Kirchneriella lunaris

    irregularis

    - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Kirchneriella obesa - 3 - - - - - - 1 - - 1

    Northeast Koliella - 1 - - 7 1 - 14 - - - 1

    Northeast Koliella longiseta - - - - - 2 - - - - - -

    Northeast Lagerheimia - - - 1 - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Lagerheimia

    wratislaviensis

    - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Lepocinclis ovum 1 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Mallomonas - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Merismopedia punctata - - - - 2 1 - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Merismopedia

    tenuissima

    1 1 2 3 13 1 6 2 6 11 9 -

    Northeast Merismopedia

    warmingiana

    - 12 21 - 8 9 - 10 22 - 35 3

    Northeast Micractinium - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Micractinium pusillum - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Microcystis - - - - - - 2 - - 1 - 15

    Northeast Microcystis aeruginosa 1 8 3 - - - - 2 - - 5 -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 48 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Microcystis wesenbergii 1 - 2 - - 1 - - 5 - 3 3

    Northeast Monoraphidium - 7 6 - 3 4 - 3 2 1 3 -

    Northeast Monoraphidium

    arcuatum

    - - - 1 - - 3 - - - - 8

    Northeast Monoraphidium

    circinale

    - - - 5 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Monoraphidium

    contortum

    - - - 1 - - - - - 3 - -

    Northeast Monoraphidium

    griffithii

    - - - - - - 4 - - 2 - -

    Northeast Monoraphidium

    irregulare

    - - - 2 - - 9 - - 2 - -

    Northeast Monoraphidium

    komarkovae

    - - - - - - - - - - - 1

    Northeast Nephrocytium - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1

    Northeast Nostocales - - - 1 - - 2 - - - - -

    Northeast Oedogonium - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Oocystis - 10 1 - - - - 4 1 1 4 3

    Northeast Oocystis parva - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

    Northeast Ophiocytium capitatum

    longispinum

    - - 1 - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Oscillatoriales - - - - - - 2 - - - - -

    Northeast Pediastrum - - - - - - - - - - - 1

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 49 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Pediastrum boryanum - - - - - 2 - - - - - -

    Northeast Pediastrum duplex 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Pediastrum tetras 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - - - -

    Northeast Peridinium - 4 2 - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Phacus - 6 1 - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Planctonema

    lauterbornii

    - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Planktolyngbya contorta 2 9 6 12 9 14 17 12 29 12 30 17

    Northeast Planktolyngbya

    limnetica

    1 2 2 2 29 22 8 29 12 14 18 11

    Northeast Planktothrix agardhii 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Pseudanabaena 3 - 6 - 5 5 4 - - - - -

    Northeast Pseudanabaena

    mucicola

    - - - - - - - - - - - 10

    Northeast Pseudodidymocystis

    fina

    - - - - - - 2 - - - - -

    Northeast Quadrigula chodati - 3 - - 3 - - 5 1 - 1 -

    Northeast Quadrigula closteroides - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

    Northeast Radiocystis geminata - - - - 7 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Rhabdoderma - 2 - - - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Rhabdogloea 4 4 1 - 5 8 - 11 1 - 2 7

    Northeast Romeria - 2 3 - 2 2 - 3 - - 1 2

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 50 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Romeria leopoliensis - - - 1 - - 2 - - - - -

    Northeast Scenedesmus - - - 6 - 5 14 - - 7 - 14

    Northeast Scenedesmus abundans - 6 3 1 7 2 7 2 2 1 3 4

    Northeast Scenedesmus

    acuminatus

    2 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 - - -

    Northeast Scenedesmus

    acutiformis

    - 2 - - - - - 6 7 - 1 -

    Northeast Scenedesmus bicaudatus 3 - 1 - - 2 - 4 2 - 1 1

    Northeast Scenedesmus bijuga 1 2 7 - 2 1 - 3 - - - 1

    Northeast Scenedesmus

    brasiliensis

    1 - - - - 1 - - - - - -

    Northeast Scenedesmus dimorphus - - - - - 2 - 1 - - - -

    Northeast Scenedesmus obtusus - - - 1 - - - - - - - -

    Northeast Scenedesmus opoliensis - - - - 2 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Scenedesmus perforatus 3 - 1 1 5 - 4 - 3 - 1 -

    Northeast Scenedesmus

    quadricauda

    9 2 4 - 12 9 - 15 13 - 5 5

    Northeast Scenedesmus verrucosus - - - - - - - - 1 - 2 -

    Northeast Schroederia judayi 1 6 4 - 4 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Schroederia setigera - - - 1 1 - - - - - - -

    Northeast Selenastrum - - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -

    Northeast Selenastrum westii 1 - - - - - - - - - - -

  • Ecological Assessment of Lake Istokpoga – May 2019

    Page 51 of 96

    Site Taxon 2016-

    7-25

    2016-

    8-23

    2016-

    9-27

    2016-

    10-19

    2016-

    11-29

    2016-

    12-27

    2017-

    1-30

    2017-

    2-28

    2017-

    3-29

    2017-

    4-11

    2017-

    5-23

    2017-

    6-29

    Northeast Snowella - 9 14 - 6 - - 16 15 - 17 8

    Northeast Snowella