Top Banner
ECA - PFM PERFORMANCE AND REFORM PRIORITIES PEMPAL BCOP Presentation February 26, 2013 Ivor Beazley, Lead Public Sector Specialist, World Bank 1
18

ECA PFM Strategy - Pempal · 2018. 3. 28. · PFM Performance 3 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 e CPIA Q13: Quality of Budget &

Feb 03, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • ECA - PFM

    PERFORMANCE AND

    REFORM PRIORITIES PEMPAL BCOP Presentation

    February 26, 2013

    Ivor Beazley, Lead Public Sector Specialist, World Bank

    1

  • Objectives/Scope

    Present the conclusions of a World Bank review of PFM performance of ECA countries using available data:

    • World Bank CPIA Index

    • PEFA reports

    • Open Budget

    Identify regional PFM issues and challenges

    Suggested PFM reform priorities

    Comments and discussion

    2

  • PFM Performance

    3

    2.8

    3

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    CP

    IA S

    co

    re

    CPIA Q13: Quality of Budget & Financial Management

    AFR

    EAP

    ECA

    LAC

    MENA

    SAR

    Global

  • 4

    CPIA 16: Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption

    PFM peformance

  • PFM Dimensions by Income Level in ECA

    5

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Credibility of the budget

    Comprehensiveness and Transparency

    Policy-Based Budgeting

    Predictability and Control in Budget

    Execution

    Accounting, Recording and Reporting

    External Scrutiny and Audit

    Low Income

    Lower Middle Income

    Upper Middle Income

  • Budget Credibility

    6

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-1 Aggregateexpenditure out-turn compared tooriginal approved

    budget

    PI-2 Compositionof expenditure

    out-turn comparedto original

    approved budget

    PI-3 Aggregaterevenue out-turn

    compared tooriginal approved

    budget

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    Budget Credibility

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    PI-1 PI-2 PI-3

    Co

    un

    try S

    co

    res

    Further analysis

    A B C D

  • Policy-Based Budgeting

    7

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-11 Orderliness andparticipation in the

    annual budget process

    PI-12 Multi-yearperspective in fiscal

    planning, expenditurepolicy and budgeting

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    ECA Average Score

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    PI-12i PI-12ii PI-12iii PI-12ivC

    ou

    ntr

    y S

    co

    res

    Decomposing PI-12

    A B C D

    (i) Multi-year fiscal forecasts and functional allocations

    (ii) Scope and frequency of debt sustainability analysis

    (iii) Existence of sector strategies with multi-year costing of

    recurrent and investment expenditure

    (iv) Linkages between investment budgets and forward

    expenditure estimates

  • Internal Controls

    8

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-4 PI-17 PI-18 PI-20

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    Internal Controls

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    PI-20i PI-20ii PI-20iii

    Co

    un

    try S

    co

    res

    Further analysis

    A B C D

    PI-4 Stock and monitoring of expenditure payment arrears

    PI-17 Recording and management of cash balances, debt and

    guarantees

    PI-18 Effectiveness of payroll controls

    PI-20 Effectiveness of internal controls for non-salary

    expenditure

    (i) Effectiveness of expenditure commitment controls

    (ii) Comprehensiveness, relevance and understanding of

    other internal control rules/ procedures

    (iii) Degree of compliance with rules for processing and

    recording transactions

  • Procurement

    9

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-19 PI-19i PI-19ii PI-19iii

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    PI-19 Procurement

    (i) Evidence on the use of open competition for award of contracts that exceed the nationally established monetary threshold for small purchases

    (percentage of the number of contract awards that are above the threshold)

    (ii) Extent of justification for use of less competitive procurement methods

    (iii) Existence and operation of a procurement complaints mechanism

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    PI-19i PI-19ii PI-19iii

    Co

    un

    try S

    co

    res

    Further analysis

    A B C D

  • Internal Audit

    10

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-21 PI-21i PI-21ii PI-21iii

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    PI-19 Internal Audit

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    PI-21i PI-21ii PI-21iii

    Co

    un

    try S

    co

    res

    Further analysis

    A B C D(i) Coverage and quality of the internal audit function

    (ii) Frequency and distribution of reports

    (iii) Extent of management response to internal audit findings

  • Accounting, Recording and Reporting

    11

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-22 PI-24 PI-25

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    Accounting and Financial Reporting

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    PI-25i PI-25ii PI-25iii

    Co

    un

    try S

    co

    res

    Further analysis

    A B C D

    PI-22 Timeliness and regularity of accounts reconciliation

    PI-24 Quality and timeliness of in-year budget reports

    PI-25 Quality and timeliness of annual financial statements

    (i) Completeness of the financial statements

    (ii) Timeliness of submission of the financial statements

    (iii) Accounting standards used

  • External Scrutiny and Audit

    12

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    PI-26 PI-27 PI-28

    PE

    FA

    Sc

    ore

    (A

    =4,

    B=

    3,

    C=

    2, D

    =1)

    External Audit and Scrutiny

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    PI-28i PI-28ii PI-28iii

    Co

    un

    try S

    co

    res

    Further analysis

    A B C D

    PI-26 Scope, nature and follow-up of external audit

    PI-27 Legislative scrutiny of the annual budget law

    PI-28 Legislative scrutiny of external audit reports

    (i) Timeliness of examination of audit reports by the legislature (for

    reports received within the last three years)

    (ii) Extent of hearings on key findings undertaken by the legislature

    (iii) Issuance of recommended actions by the legislature and

    implementation by the executive

  • Fiscal Transparency

    13

    17

    20

    35

    39

    42

    47

    47

    48

    50

    52

    54

    55

    59

    61

    65

    67

    74

    74

    75

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Tajikistan

    Kyrgyz Republic

    Macedonia

    Serbia

    Azerbaijan

    Albania

    Romania

    Kazakhstan

    Turkey

    ECA Average

    Ukraine

    Georgia

    Poland

    Croatia

    Bulgaria

    Slovakia

    Russia

    Slovenia

    Czech Republic

    Open Budget Index 2012

    49.4 50.4 52.3 51.7

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    2006 2008 2010 2012

    ECA Average over time

  • Strategic challenges to ECA countries fiscal

    stability and future prosperity?

    • Slow projected growth

    • Need to invest in

    infrastructure and skills

    to boost competitiveness

    14

    Real GDP Growth

    o

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    USA EU15 Europeand

    CentralAsia

    East Asiaand Pacific

    Africa LatinAmerica

    MiddleEast and

    NorthAfrica

    South Asia

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

  • Fiscal imbalances and debt

    15

    External Debt (Public and Private)

  • Bad Demographics

    8 2

    2 0

    0 -3

    -5 -5

    -6 -6

    -7 -9

    -9 -10 -10 -10

    -10 -11

    -12 -12

    -12 -13 -13

    -15 -10 -5 0 5 10

    Tajikistan

    Turkmenistan

    Kyrgyz Republic

    Albania

    Armenia

    Serbia

    Moldova

    Macedonia

    Ukraine

    Russia

    Bulgaria

    Poland

    Share of Working Age Population

    Projected Change in Share of Working Age Population,

    2010-2050

    • Pressure on

    discretionary budget

    • Reform of entitlement

    programs to ensure

    sustainability

    • Rebalancing revenues

    (declining payroll tax)

    • Inter-generational

    equity issues

    16

  • Priorities for PFM Reform

    •Use of medium/longer term budgeting and fiscal rules

    •Management of debt and arrears (incl. municipal)

    •Governance of SOEs, and associated fiscal risks

    •Reform of entitlement programs to ensure sustainability

    •Broadening the tax base and improving collection

    Long term budget sustainability

    •Results orientation in budgeting (MTEF, PBB)

    • Investment in information management (IFMIS)

    • Improved evaluation and management of capital projects

    •Supporting new models of service delivery (incl. PPPs)

    •Reducing waste and corruption in public procurement

    Budget efficiency – doing more with less

    •Control of debt and arrears

    •Modernization of transfers and grants

    •Management of EU funds (structural, cohesion, climate change etc.)

    •Capacity building

    Strengthening PFM at sub-national level to

    support decentralization

    •Modernization of internal controls

    •Strengthening independent audit and oversight

    • Improving the quality and availability of budget information (citizen budget, IFMIS etc.)

    • Improving civic consultation and participation

    Increasing fiscal transparency and

    accountability

    17

  • COMMENTS-QUESTIONS?

    18